Next Article in Journal
Polymer–Ceramic Composite Membranes for Water Removal in Membrane Reactors
Next Article in Special Issue
The Functional Significance of Hydrophobic Residue Distribution in Bacterial Beta-Barrel Transmembrane Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced BDNF Actions Following Acute Hypoxia Facilitate HIF-1α-Dependent Upregulation of Cav3-T-Type Ca2+ Channels in Rat Cardiomyocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid Production and Purification of Dye-Loaded Liposomes by Electrodialysis-Driven Depletion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances about the Roles of Membranes in Cotton Fiber Development

1
Biotechnology Research Center, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Crop Quality Improvement of Ministry of Agriculture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(7), 471; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070471
Submission received: 30 May 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 24 June 2021 / Published: 25 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Membranes in Life Sciences)

Abstract

:
Cotton fiber is an extremely elongated single cell derived from the ovule epidermis and is an ideal model for studying cell development. The plasma membrane is tremendously expanded and accompanied by the coordination of various physiological and biochemical activities on the membrane, one of the three major systems of a eukaryotic cell. This review compiles the recent progress and advances for the roles of the membrane in cotton fiber development: the functions of membrane lipids, especially the fatty acids, sphingolipids, and phytosterols; membrane channels, including aquaporins, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, vacuolar invertase, and plasmodesmata; and the regulation mechanism of membrane proteins, such as membrane binding enzymes, annexins, and receptor-like kinases.

1. Introduction

Cotton (G. hirsutum L.) is the world’s most important natural fiber for the textile industry and a mainstays of the global economy [1]. This single-celled fiber, formed by polar elongation and the secondary cell wall (SCW) thickening of the ovule epidermal cell, makes it an ideal material for studying cell elongation and SCW deposition [2,3]. Cell development passes through four stages: initiation, elongation, secondary wall synthesis, and mature dehydration. The initiation, elongation, and SCW deposition periods determine the length, strength and fineness of the fiber [4], which requires the coordination of cell wall yield properties, turgor pressure, lipid biosynthesis, and cell wall components and proteins [1].
The plasma membrane (PM) surrounding each cell serves as an active communication interface between the cell, neighboring cells, and eventually the whole organism [5]. The membrane a remarkably complex organization of lipids and proteins [6]. The lipids consist of phospholipids, sphingolipids and sterols, of which the phospholipids are the main components of the lipid bilayer [7,8], while sphingolipids and sterols are enriched in microdomains in the PM, also called membrane lipid raft [9], and their predominant role is to maintain its structural integrity. Recently, they have been thought to act as signaling molecules in several processes including programmed cell death (PCD) [10,11] and responses to biotic and abiotic stress [9]. Proteins embedded in the membrane lipid bilayer (ion channels) are essential tunnels and dynamic regulators of ion flux across membranes. The function of ion channels in regulating osmotic pressure, growth, signaling, movement, and nutrient acquisition has been fully reviewed by [12]. Plasmodesmata (PDs) are tight membrane contact sites and channels that extend through the cell wall to establish both membrane and cytosolic continuity and serve as conduits for the transport of proteins, small RNAs, hormones, and metabolites during development and defense signaling. They also play essential roles in controlling cell-to-cell connectivity [13].
Plant PM-resident receptors recognize exogenous and endogenous signals, and then trigger proper responses to ensure a balanced modulation of development and stress adaptation [14,15]. Heterotrimeric G-proteins have crucial roles in regulating signaling pathways that are essential for growth and development [16]. The Rop guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) of small GTP-binding superfamily proteins regulate cell expansion through cortical actin/microtubule dynamics [17]. The cell walls provide support and protection and determine both plant morphology and mechanical characteristics. The PM-localized cellulose synthase (CESA) complex contains essential enzymes for cellulose synthesis, which, together with proteins and other biomolecules, make up the cell walls [18,19].
Over the past two decades, many advances have been made concerning the roles of membrane functions in cotton fiber development. In this review, we summarize this research from three aspects: the functions of membrane lipids in cotton fiber growth, the roles of membrane channels in cotton fiber development, and the regulation mechanism of membrane proteins in fiber development.

2. The Functions of Membrane Lipids in Cotton Fiber Development

Fatty acids and lipids, which are essential constituents of all plant cells, not only provide structural integrity and energy for various metabolic processes but also function as signal transduction mediators [20]. Transcriptome analysis revealed that, during fiber cell elongation, lipid metabolism pathways are significantly up-regulated [21]. Cold stress is related to membrane structure; however, the relationship between cold stress and fiber needs to be strongly confirmed, but the formation of unsaturated fatty acids under cold stress could maintain the specific membrane structure required for fiber elongation [22]. Fiber cells contain significantly higher amounts of phosphatidylinositol (PI) with PI 34:3 being the most predominant species. The fatty acid desaturases, PI synthase, and PI kinase encoded genes (Δ15GhFAD, PIS, and PIK) were preferentially expressed in fibers. The application of linolenic acid (C18:3), soybean L-a-PI, and phosphatidylinositol monophosphate in cultured cotton ovules significantly promoted fiber growth, whereas a treatment with a liver PI lacking the C18:3 moiety, linoleic acid, and phosphatidylinositol monophosphate was completely ineffective. Moreover, suppression of Δ15GhFAD, GhPIS, and GhPIK resulted in significantly short-fibered phenotypes [23]. These evidence provide the basis for in-depth studies on the roles of PM-lipids in mediating cotton fiber growth.
The lipid raft is a microregion in the membrane lipid bilayer composed mainly of sphingolipids, sterols and proteins, and is an important part of the regulatory center of the membrane [5]. Sphingolipids are complex soluble fats that are found in all animals, plants, fungi and in few prokaryotes and viruses. The sphingolipid molecule has three main components: a long chain base (LCB), a long chain fatty acids (LCFA) or a very long chain fatty acid (VLCFA), and a polar head group. Sphingolipids play important roles in signaling pathways and many cellular processes, such as membrane protein targeting [24,25]. Fumonisin B1 (FB1) is produced by Fusarium moniliforme, which has a structure very similar to that of sphinganine (Sph) and acts as a specific inhibitor of ceramide synthase (CS) [26]. Wang et al., reported that FB1 severely blocked fiber cell elongation in cultured cotton ovules. Sphingolipidomic results of FB1 treated ovules showed that 95 sphingolipids were altered after FB1 treatment, of which 29 were significantly increased, while 33 were significantly decreased. Proteomic analysis found 633 upregulated and 672 downregulated proteins after FB1 treatment, and most of the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were involved in processes related to phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis. Additionally, FB1 significantly suppressed the expression of plasmodesma callose-binding protein 3-like [27]. Exogenous application of saturated very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs; C20:0 to C30:0) to ovules in in vitro cultures significantly promoted cotton fiber cell elongation, whereas those treated with VLCFA biosynthesis inhibitor, acetochlor (2-chloro-N-[ethoxymethyl]N-[2-ethyl-6-methyl-phenyl]-acetamide; ACE) abolished fiber growth. This inhibition was overcome by adding lignoceric acid (C24:0), which induced a rapid and significant increase in ACO (for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase) transcript levels, resulting in substantial ethylene production and indicating that VLCFAs may act upstream of ethylene to promote fiber cell elongation [28]. These results indicated that sphingolipids have important roles in fiber elongation.
Plant sterols, also known as phytosterols, are an important component of membranes and a precursor of brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis. Sterols has been reported to play essential roles in cell elongation, microtubule cell development and arrangement, cellulose synthesis, and cell wall formation [29]. GhDET2, which encodes the steroid 5α-reductase, was highly expressed during the fiber initiation and rapid fiber elongation stages. Suppression of GhDET2 inhibited both expressions, while seed coat-specific expression of GhDET2 increased fiber number and length. These results indicated that the GhDET2 gene plays an important role in the initiation and rapid elongation of cotton fibers [30]. The highest expression of the sterol C-24 methyltransferase gene, GhSMT2-1, was found at 10 DPA (days past anthesis), which was consistent with the period when the fiber cells had the highest elongation rate, and a high sterol content was found at the rapid fiber elongation stage. This showed that GhSMT2-1 is important for fiber elongation [31]. The decrease or increase in the ratio of phytosterol/sitosterol was related to the promotion or inhibition of fiber elongation, respectively. Compared with wild-type TM-1, the expression of genes related to plant sterol biosynthesis was downregulated in the short fibers of the super-short fiber mutant Li-1. These results indicated that sterols are important for the development of cotton fiber cells, especially in the elongation of cotton fibers [32]. Niu et al. found that GhSMT2-1 overexpression led to changes in phytosterol content and the campesterol to sitosterol ratio. At the rapid elongation stage, total phytosterol and sitosterol content increased while campesterol content was decreased in transgenic fibers when compared to control fibers. Accordingly, the ratio of campesterol to sitosterol declined strikingly. Simultaneously, the transgenic fibers were shorter and thicker than control fibers. Exogenous application of sitosterol or campesterol separately in vitro inhibited control fiber cell elongation in a cotton ovule culture system. In addition, campesterol treatment partially rescued transgenic fiber elongation. There might be a specific ratio of campesterol to sitosterol in different developmental stages of cotton fibers, in which GhSMT2-1 plays an important role [33].
The molecular function of sterols in cellulose biosynthesis was well reviewed by Schrick et al. The function of the cellulose synthase complex requires a specific lipid environment, which may be provided by the lipid raft, a sphingolipid- and sterol-rich microdomain [34]. It was observed that the lipid raft coexists with other membrane fluid domains [5], so its activity was used to estimate membrane properties. In the fiber cell development, lipid raft activity exhibited a low–high–low change in regularity during fiber cell development, but the pattern was disrupted in the short-lint fiber Ligon lintless-1 (Li1) mutant, suggesting that membrane lipid order and lipid raft activity are closely linked to cell development [35].

3. The Role of Membrane Channels in Cotton Fiber Development

Cell expansion is a major component of plant cell development and organ growth. As a unidirectional cell expansion process, cotton fiber elongation is a result of the complex interplay between cell turgor and cell wall extensibility [36,37]. Aquaporins (AQPs) are membrane channels that facilitate the transport of water and small neutral molecules across biological membranes that belong to a highly conserved group of proteins called intrinsic proteins. AQPs play crucial roles in plant–water relations and cell turgor pressure maintenance and are required for growth and development and responses to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses [38,39]. By measuring levels of mRNA and protein accumulation and enzyme activity, it was possible to analyze the expression of components involved in turgor regulation: plasma membrane proton-translocating ATPase, vacuole-ATPase, proton-translocating pyrophosphatase (PPase), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, and major intrinsic proteins. All but the PPase were highly accumulated during peak expansion (12–15 DPA), and then declined with the onset of secondary cell wall synthesis. The PPase was constitutively expressed through all development stages. Additionally, the activity of the two proton-translocating-ATPases peaked at 15 DPA, whereas PPase peaked at 20 DPA. These cues suggested that the turgor-related genes were regulated at the transcriptional and posttranslational levels through fiber development [36].
The plant aquaporins were divided into 5 subfamilies: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIP), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIP), NOD26-like intrinsic proteins (NIP), small basic intrinsic proteins (SIP), and the recently discovered X intrinsic proteins (XIP). There were 71 aquaporin genes in upland cotton (G. hirsutum), and 28, 23, 12, 7, and 1 of them belonged to the 5 subfamilies, respectively [40]. Two cotton PIP/TIP encoding genes, GhPIP1-2 and GhcTIP1, were predominantly expressed during fiber elongation, with the highest expression levels in 5 DPA fibers, implying that they might support the rapid influx of water into vacuoles during fiber cell expansion [41]. PIPs usually form hetero-oligomers to perform their functions. For cotton PIP2 groups, GhPIP2;3 interacted with GhPIP2;4 and GhPIP2;6, but GhPIP2;6 did not interact with GhPIP2;4. Co-expression of GhPIP2;3/2;4 or GhPIP2;3/2;6 resulted in an increased oocyte permeability coefficient. Overexpression of GhPIP2 genes in yeast induced longitudinal growth, whereas down-regulation of GhPIP2 genes in cotton markedly hindered fiber elongation. That is to say, GhPIP2 proteins selectively form hetero-oligomers to regulate their activities to meet the requirements for fiber elongation [42].
The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters serves to translocate a broad range of substances across biological membranes powered by ATP hydrolysis [43]. GhWBC1, a cotton ABC transporter, was highly expressed in developing fiber cells and peaked in rapidly expanding fibers from 5 to 9 DPA. The overexpression of GhWBC1 in Arabidopsis exhibited short siliques, implying that GhWBC1 might have participated in cotton fiber elongation [44].
Vacuolar invertase (VIN) has long been known to be important for cell expansion [45]. Its activity during rapid elongation stage was approximately 4-6-fold of that in leaves, stems, and roots, and its activity in a genotype with faster fiber elongation was significantly higher than that in a slow-elongating genotype, implying that VIN plays a pivotal role in cotton fiber elongation. The expression of GhVIN1 was closely matched by VIN activity and the fiber elongation rate. Ectopic expression of GhVIN1 could complement the short-root phenotype of a VIN T-DNA mutant in Arabidopsis. Moreover, up- and downregulation of GhVIN1 resulted in an increase or decrease in elongation, respectively [46,47]. Suppression of GhVIN1 led to a fiberless phenotype in a dosage-dependent manner by regulating hexose signaling and the transcription of several MYB transcription factors and auxin signaling components required for fiber initiation [48]. This demonstrated the essential role of VIN in early fiber elongation.
Plasmodesmata (PD) are intercellular pores connecting most plant cells and controlling the entry and exit of molecules at cell boundaries [49]. The fiber PD were initially permeable at 0–9 DPA, closed at 10 DPA, and re-opened at 16 DPA. The expression of sucrose and K+ transporter genes were consistent with the transient closure of the PD and maximally in the 10 DPA fibers. Consequently, the osmotic and turgor potentials were elevated during this period, indicating that elongation was achieved largely by cell wall loosening and terminated by increased wall rigidity and loss of higher turgor [37]. Moreover, the PD closure positively correlated with fiber length among three tetraploid genotypes and two diploid progenitors. Additionally, the callose deposition and degradation at the fiber base correlated with the timing of PDs closure and reopening, respectively. The expression of the fiber-specific β-1,3-glucanase gene, GhGluc1, coincided with this pattern during fiber elongation, and was high in the short fiber genotype and weak in the intermediate- and long-fiber genotypes [50]; that is, the duration of the PD closure correlated positively with the final fiber length, which supports the idea that PD closure may be required for fibers to achieve extended elongation. Delayed expression of Sus in the seed-coat epidermis that correlates temporally and spatially with the initiation of fiber cells was observed in a lintless mutant fls. In addition, no closure of PD was visible during the entire elongation period of short fibres from this mutant, indicating that the short-fiber cell phenotype of the fls mutant correlated with the delayed or insufficient expression of Sus in a subset of seed-coat epidermal cells and their inability to close PD [51]. Suppressing the expression of the sterol carrier protein gene, GhSCP2D led to reduced sterol content and closed PD at 5 through 25 DPA. The abnormally closing of PD in GhSCP2D suppression lines was due to reduced expression of the PD-targeting β-1,3-glucanase GhPdBG3-2A/D. In addition, suppressing GhSCP2D upregulated a cohort of SUT and SWEET sucrose transporter genes in fiber cells [52]. This evidence indicated that PDs indeed play vital roles in fiber cell development.

4. The Regulation Mechanism of Membrane Proteins in Cotton Fiber Development

PM serves as the site of attachment of most enzymes, about 80% of which are membrane binding such as the cellulose synthase complex is located in the plasma membrane [35]. Sucrose synthase (SuSy) has always been considered to be a cytoplasmic enzyme, and in the development of cotton fiber, at least half of SuSy is tightly associated with the PM, which might channel carbon directly from sucrose to glucan implying that SuSy might have some role in cell wall synthesis [53]. Immunolocalization results showed that SuSy is localized in a proximal exoplasmic zone near cortical microtubules and PM, and the callose (β-1,3-glucan) was co-distributed with SuSy within this zone [54]. Expression analyses suggested that most SuSy genes had development-dependent expression profiles [55]. The SusC isoform of SuSy has been reported to be expressed at high levels during secondary cell wall synthesis [56]. Through transforming cotton with SuSy suppression constructs, Ruan et al. showed that the suppression of SuSy in the maternal seed tissue repressed fiber development, while suppression in the endosperm and embryo inhibited embryo development and seed size [57]. The expression of GhSusA1 was significantly enhanced in GA-overproducing transgenic fibers and was induced by the exogenous application of bioactive GA in cultured fibers [58]. The suppression of GhSusA1 led to reduced fiber quality, boll size, and seed weight, while the overexpression of this gene increased fiber length and strength [59]. In addition, the overexpression of a potato SuSy and a synthetic SuSy gene also improved cotton fiber quality [60,61]. Therefore, PM-associated SuSy are important for cotton fiber development, and could be used for improving fiber products.
SCW deposition is crucial for cotton fiber strength and fineness and a large amount of cellulose biosynthesis is mainly carried out to promote cell wall thickening [62]. Cellulose is synthesized by the PM-associated cellulose synthase complex (CSC) [63]. The cellulose synthase gene superfamily includes the cellulose synthase (Ces) and cellulose synthase-like (Csl) families. There were 228 Ces/Csl genes from four Gossypium species (G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii). Transcriptome analysis revealed that CesA genes were more highly expressed in tetraploids than in diploids, whereas Csl expression levels exhibited the opposite trend [64]. In addition, 18 GhCesA genes were located near the region of 74 quantitative trait loci associated with fiber quality [65]. The expression of GhCesA4 was significantly upregulated at the SCW synthesis stage, and GhCesA4 is important for cellulose biosynthesis during cotton fiber development [66]. GhCesA2 was preferentially expressed during the cellulose biosynthesis stage of fiber development, and was highly expressed in one near-isogenic line (NIL) with higher fiber bundle strength, implying that GhCesA2 was related to fiber strength [67]. Phylogenetic and gene co-expression analysis revealed that GhCesA1, GhCesA2, GhCesA7, and GhCesA8 were mainly in charge of SCW biosynthesis, whereas GhCesA3, GhCesA5, GhCesA6, GhCesA9, and GhCesA10 were involved in primary cell wall formation [68]. Overexpression of the GhCSLD3 gene enhanced primary cell wall synthesis, resulting in restored cell elongation and cell wall integrity. It then partially rescued the growth defect of the atcesa6 mutant during early vegetative growth [69]. These cues implied that the differential expression profile of genes associated with SCW cellulose biosynthesis was associated with cotton fiber properties. Recently, Zhang et al. resolved the structure of GhCesA7. Its homotrimer showed a C3 symmetrical assembly, and each protomer contained seven transmembrane helices (TMs), which formed a channel that facilitated the release of newly synthesized glucans. The cytoplasmic glycosyltransferase (GT) domain of GhCesA7 protruded from the membrane to form a catalytic pocket towards the TM pore that facilitated microfibril formation [70].
Cotton fiber annexins bind to the membranes in a Ca2+-dependent manner, and modulate the activity or localization of callose synthase [71]. AnxGb6 was specifically expressed in elongating cotton fibers, and its expression correlated with cotton fiber length, especially the fiber elongation rate. Overexpression of AnxGb6 in Arabidopsis enhanced root elongation without increasing the root cell number [72]. AnnGh3, AnnGh4, and AnnGh5 were preferentially expressed in rapidly elongating fibers. Ectopic expression of AnnGh3 in Arabidopsis resulted in a significant increase in trichome density and length of leaves [73]. AnxGb5/6 and their interacted proteins generated a protein macroraft in the cell membrane that was probably a stabilizing scaffold for Actin1 organization [74]. These results suggested that annexins may link Ca2+ signaling and actin assembling to the membrane to regulate fiber cell elongation.
As mentioned above, receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like proteins (RLPs) on the PM are essential for mediating cell-to-cell and cell-to-environment communication, and then to regulate the balance between growth and immunity. Dynamic transcriptome analysis of the short fiber mutant Li1 showed that common, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were involved in the responses to auxin- and receptor kinase-related pathways for fibers bearing ovules at 3 and 8 DPA [75]. RNA sequencing of 15 and 20 DAP fiber cells from cotton lines MD52ne and MD90ne indicated that receptor-like kinases are potential candidate genes responsible for superior fiber strength in MD52ne [76]. Expression of genome-wide cotton LRR-RLK genes were involved in stress defense and diverse developmental processes, including fiber development [77]. The cotton genome has 29 wall-associated kinases (WAK), most of which are highly expressed in fibers and ovules [78]. GhRLK1 is mainly expressed at the SCW synthesis period of fiber cells, and GhRLK1 has dual specificity both as a serine/threonine kinase and a tyrosine kinase [79]. All these transcriptome and expression profile implied that RLKs and RLPs might play important roles in fiber development; however, the detailed mechanisms underlying their functions need further study.
Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins (FLAs), a subclass of arabinogalactan proteins, are important for many processes of plant development or adaptation [80]. Huang et al. isolated 19 GhFLA cotton genes and showed that GhFLA1/2/4 were predominantly expressed in 10 DPA fibers, and GhFLA6/14/15/18 accumulated at relatively high levels [81]. A cotton GPI-anchored lipid transport protein, GhLTPG1, was abundantly expressed in elongating the fibers and the outer integument of the ovules. The knockdown of GhLTPG1 leads to significantly reduced fiber length, and was due to decreased polar lipid content and repression of fiber elongation-related genes [82]. Phospholipase D (PLD), catalyzes the hydrolysis of phospholipids to produce PA and free polar head groups, and plays diverse roles in plant growth and development [83]. The GhPLDα1 gene was expressed in various cotton tissues with the highest level in fibers at 20 DPA. The enzyme activity of GhPLDα1 correlated with H2O2 content and was related to secondary cell wall thickening [84]. The yield and quality of cotton fibers were also significantly affected by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [85], and PM NADPH oxidases (NOXs), also called respiratory burst oxidase homologues (Rbohs), have been shown to be significant sources. There were 13, 13, 26 and 19 Rbohs in G. arboretum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, and G. barbadense, respectively. Most of these GhRbohs were highly expressed in flowers. A few of them were preferentially and specifically expressed during ovule growth and fiber formation, which might be important for fiber development [86]. The GhCPK1 gene that encodes a PM-localized calcium dependent protein kinase, was primarily expressed in the elongating fiber and might be involved in calcium signaling associated with fiber elongation [87]. Taken together, many of the genes that encodes PM proteins were preferentially expressed in fibers. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying their functions in fiber development need further study.

5. Conclusions

Cotton fiber is a highly polarized and elongated single cell, which makes it an ideal model for the study of PM development. Research on cotton fiber development will help us understand the functions of PM in plants. Recently, great progress has been made in cotton fiber development as many important genes have been identified and functionally characterized. The related Genes/Proteins/Reagents and their roles in fiber development are listed in Table 1. However, the regulatory molecular network of fiber cell development is largely unclear. As one of the three major cell systems, the membrane is integral to the regulation of cell growth and development. The major components of the membrane lipid raft (sphingolipids, and sterols), the PM channels, PDs, and PM-resident proteins had all been reported to be involved in cotton fiber elongation or SCW deposition. Further study on the membrane may focus on its role in signal perception and transmission (such as hormone and environmental signaling), protein sorting and transportation, the formation of primary and secondary walls, and cellulose synthesis.
Based on the variety of membrane components, it can be speculated that the function and regulatory mechanism of the membrane system in fiber development are complex. Advances in membrane study could promote research into cotton fiber, and progress in the study of microregions or lipid rafts and advancements in membrane research will shed light on our study. Recently, lipid rafts (lipid microdomains) were considered to be the functional domains of membranes, so lipid raft activity in cotton fiber cells should be given more attention. Additionally, modifying the factors associated with the membrane might disturb the vegetative and reproductive growth of the cotton plant, which is a serious concern because transgenic plants do not produce seed or fiber. Fiber-specific promoters and inducible promoters may reduce the side effects on plant growth, which is conducive to the study of gene function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.X., Q.C., and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.X.; writing—review and editing, M.L.; funding acquisition, L.H.; summarizing the table. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571722 and 31971984).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

SCWsecondary cell wall
PMplasma membrane
PCDprogrammed cell death
PDsPlasmodesmata
CESAcellulose synthase
PIphosphatidylinositol
FADfatty acid desaturase
PISphosphatidylinositol synthase
PIKphosphatidylinositol kinase
LCBlong chain base
LCFAlong chain fatty acid
FB1fumonisin B1
Sphsphinganine
CSceramide synthase
DEPdifferentially expressed protein
VLCFAsvery-long-chain fatty acids
ACE2-chloro-N-[ethoxymethyl]N-[2-ethyl-6-methyl-phenyl]-acetamide
ACO1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase
BRbrassinosteroid
DPAdays past anthesis
AQPaquaporin
PPasepyrophosphatase
PIPplasma membrane intrinsic protein
TIPtonoplast intrinsic protein
NIPNOD26-like intrinsic protein
SIPsmall basic intrinsic protein
XIPX intrinsic protein
ABCATP-binding cassette
VINvacuolar invertase
SuSysucrose synthase
GAgibberellin acid
CSCcellulose synthase complex
Cescellulose synthase
Cslcellulose synthase-like
NILnear-isogenic line
TMstransmembrane helices
GTglycosyltransferase
RLKreceptor-like kinase
RLPreceptor-like protein
DEGdifferentially expressed gene
WAKwall-associated kinase
FLAfasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein
GPIglycosylphosphatidylinositol
PLDPhospholipase D
ROSreactive oxygen species
NOXsNADPH oxidases
Rbohsrespiratory burst oxidase homologues

References

  1. Huang, G.; Huang, J.-Q.; Chen, X.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-X. Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in Cotton Research. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 437–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qin, Y.-M.; Zhu, Y.-X. How cotton fibers elongate: a tale of linear cell-growth mode. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, H.J.; Triplett, B.A. Cotton Fiber Growth in Planta and in Vitro. Models for Plant Cell Elongation and Cell Wall Biogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1361–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haigler, C.H.; Ebetancur, L.; Stiff, M.R.; Tuttle, J.R. Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Malinsky, J.; Opekarová, M.; Grossmann, G.; Tanner, W. Membrane Microdomains, Rafts, and Detergent-Resistant Membranes in Plants and Fungi. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 501–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Breslow, D.; Weissman, J.S. Membranes in Balance: Mechanisms of Sphingolipid Homeostasis. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Orešič, M. Informatics and computational strategies for the study of lipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2011, 1811, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shevchenko, A.; Simons, K. Lipidomics: coming to grips with lipid diversity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cacas, J.-L.; Buré, C.; Grosjean, K.; Gerbeau-Pissot, P.; Lherminier, J.; Rombouts, Y.; Maes, E.; Bossard, C.; Gronnier, J.; Furt, F.; et al. Revisiting Plant Plasma Membrane Lipids in Tobacco: A Focus on Sphingolipids. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shi, L.; Bielawski, J.; Mu, J.; Dong, H.; Teng, C.; Zhang, J.; Yang, X.; Tomishige, N.; Hanada, K.; Hannun, Y.A.; et al. Erratum: Involvement of sphingoid bases in mediating reactive oxygen intermediate production and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zienkiewicz, A.; Gömann, J.; König, S.; Herrfurth, C.; Liu, Y.; Meldau, D.; Feussner, I. Disruption of Arabidopsis neutral ceramidases 1 and 2 results in specific sphingolipid imbalances triggering different phytohormone-dependent plant cell death programmes. New Phytol. 2019, 226, 170–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pantoja, O. Recent Advances in the Physiology of Ion Channels in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 463–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tilsner, J.; Nicolas, W.; Rosado, A.; Bayer, E.M. Staying Tight: Plasmodesmal Membrane Contact Sites and the Control of Cell-to-Cell Connectivity in Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 337–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, D.; Wang, G.; Zhou, J.-M. Receptor Kinases in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: More Than Pattern Recognition. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 618–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Manhães, A.M.E.D.A.; Ortiz-Morea, F.A.; He, P.; Shan, L. Plant plasma membrane-resident receptors: Surveillance for infections and coordination for growth and development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ofoe, R. Signal transduction by plant heterotrimeric G-protein. Plant Biol. 2021, 23, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nielsen, E. The Small GTPase Superfamily in Plants: A Conserved Regulatory Module with Novel Functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 247–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Anderson, C.T.; Kieber, J.J. Dynamic Construction, Perception, and Remodeling of Plant Cell Walls. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 39–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Hoffmann, N.; King, S.; Samuels, A.L.; McFarlane, H.E. Subcellular coordination of plant cell wall synthesis. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 933–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lim, G.-H.; Singhal, R.; Kachroo, A.; Kachroo, P. Fatty acid– and lipid-mediated signaling in plant defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 505–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gou, J.-Y.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, S.-P.; Hu, W.-L.; Chen, X.-Y. Gene expression and metabolite profiles of cotton fiber during cell elongation and secondary cell wall synthesis. Cell Res. 2007, 17, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kargiotidou, A.; Deli, D.; Galanopoulou, D.; Tsaftaris, A.; Farmaki, T. Low temperature and light regulate delta 12 fatty acid desaturases (FAD2) at a transcriptional level in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2043–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, G.-J.; Xiao, G.-H.; Liu, N.-J.; Liu, D.; Chen, P.-S.; Qin, Y.-M.; Zhu, Y.-X. Targeted Lipidomics Studies Reveal that Linolenic Acid Promotes Cotton Fiber Elongation by Activating Phosphatidylinositol and Phosphatidylinositol Monophosphate Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. E Markham, J.; Lynch, D.V.; Napier, J.; Dunn, T.M.; Cahoon, E.B. Plant sphingolipids: function follows form. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luttgeharm, K.D.; Kimberlin, A.N.; Cahoon, E.B. Plant Sphingolipid Metabolism and Function. Prokaryotic Cytoskelet. 2016, 86, 249–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luttgeharm, K.D.; Cahoon, E.B.; Markham, J.E. Substrate specificity, kinetic properties and inhibition by fumonisin B1 of ceramide synthase isoforms from Arabidopsis. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, Y.; Luo, M. Fumonisin B1-Induced Changes in Cotton Fiber Elongation Revealed by Sphingolipidomics and Proteomics. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, Y.-M.; Hu, C.-Y.; Pang, Y.; Kastaniotis, A.; Hiltunen, J.K.; Zhu, Y.-X. Saturated Very-Long-Chain Fatty Acids Promote Cotton Fiber and Arabidopsis Cell Elongation by Activating Ethylene Biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3692–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Benveniste, P. Biosynthesis and Accumulation of Sterols. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 429–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, M.; Xiao, Y.; Li, X.; Lu, X.; Deng, W.; Li, D.; Hou, L.; Hu, M.; Li, Y.; Pei, Y. GhDET2, a steroid 5α-reductase, plays an important role in cotton fiber cell initiation and elongation. Plant J. 2007, 51, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, M.; Tan, K.; Xiao, Z.; Hu, M.; Liao, P.; Chen, K. Cloning and expression of two sterol C-24 methyltransferase genes from upland cotton (Gossypium hirsuturm L.). J. Genet. Genom. 2008, 35, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deng, S.; Wei, T.; Tan, K.; Hu, M.; Li, F.; Zhai, Y.; Ye, S.; Xiao, Y.; Hou, L.; Pei, Y.; et al. Phytosterol content and the campesterol:sitosterol ratio influence cotton fiber development: role of phytosterols in cell elongation. Sci. China Life Sci. 2016, 59, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Niu, Q.; Tan, K.; Zang, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, K.; Hu, M.; Luo, M. Modification of phytosterol composition influences cotton fiber cell elongation and secondary cell wall deposition. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schrick, K.; DeBolt, S.; Bulone, V. Deciphering the Molecular Functions of Sterols in Cellulose Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Xu, F.; Suo, X.; Li, F.; Bao, C.; He, S.; Huang, L.; Luo, M. Membrane lipid raft organization during cotton fiber development. J. Cotton Res. 2020, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Smart, L.B.; Vojdani, F.; Maeshima, M.; Wilkins, T.A. Genes Involved in Osmoregulation during Turgor-Driven Cell Expansion of Developing Cotton Fibers Are Differentially Regulated1. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 1539–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ruan, Y.-L.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Furbank, R.T. The Control of Single-Celled Cotton Fiber Elongation by Developmentally Reversible Gating of Plasmodesmata and Coordinated Expression of Sucrose and K+ Transporters and Expansin. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Li, G.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B.; Tian, S. Roles of Aquaporins in Plant-Pathogen Interaction. Plants 2020, 9, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, F.; Sun, L.; Hao, F. Versatile Roles of Aquaporins in Plant Growth and Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, W.; E Scheffler, B.; Bauer, P.J.; Campbell, B.T. Identification of the family of aquaporin genes and their expression in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, D.; Tu, L.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, X. Characterization and expression of plasma and tonoplast membrane aquaporins in elongating cotton fibers. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, D.-D.; Ruan, X.-M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.-J.; Wang, X.-L.; Li, X.-B. Cotton plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2s (PIP2s) selectively interact to regulate their water channel activities and are required for fibre development. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lefèvre, F.; Boutry, M. Towards identification of the substrates of ATP-binding cassette transporters. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 18–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Zhu, Y.-Q.; Xu, K.-X.; Luo, B.; Wang, J.-W.; Chen, X.-Y. An ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter GhWBC1 from Elongating Cotton Fibers. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ruan, Y.-L.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Li, G.-J.; Boyer, J.S. Sugar Input, Metabolism, and Signaling Mediated by Invertase: Roles in Development, Yield Potential, and Response to Drought and Heat. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, L.; Li, X.-R.; Lian, H.; Ni, D.-A.; He, Y.-K.; Chen, X.; Ruan, Y.-L. Evidence That High Activity of Vacuolar Invertase Is Required for Cotton Fiber and Arabidopsis Root Elongation through Osmotic Dependent and Independent Pathways, respectively. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, L.; Ruan, Y.-L. Unraveling mechanisms of cell expansion linking solute transport, metabolism, plasmodesmtal gating and cell wall dynamics. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 1561–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, L.; Cook, A.; Patrick, J.W.; Chen, X.; Ruan, Y.-L. Silencing the vacuolar invertase geneGhVIN1blocks cotton fiber initiation from the ovule epidermis, probably by suppressing a cohort of regulatory genes via sugar signaling. Plant J. 2014, 78, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oelmüller, R. Threat at One End of the Plant: What Travels to Inform the Other Parts? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ruan, Y.-L.; Xu, S.-M.; White, R.; Furbank, R. Genotypic and Developmental Evidence for the Role of Plasmodesmatal Regulation in Cotton Fiber Elongation Mediated by Callose Turnover. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 4104–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ruan, Y.-L.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Furbank, R.T.; Chourey, P.S. The delayed initiation and slow elongation of fuzz-like short fibre cells in relation to altered patterns of sucrose synthase expression and plasmodesmata gating in a lintless mutant of cotton. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Zhou, N.; Wang, F.; Guan, X.; Fang, L.; Shang, X.; Guo, W.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, T. Suppressing a Putative Sterol Carrier Gene Reduces Plasmodesmal Permeability and Activates Sucrose Transporter Genes during Cotton Fiber Elongation. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 2027–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Amor, Y.; Haigler, C.; Johnson, S.; Wainscott, M.; Delmer, D.P. A membrane-associated form of sucrose synthase and its potential role in synthesis of cellulose and callose in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 9353–9357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Salnikov, V.V.; Grimson, M.J.; Seagull, R.W.; Haigler, C. Localization of sucrose synthase and callose in freeze-substituted secondary-wall-stage cotton fibers. Protoplasma 2003, 221, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zou, C.; Lu, C.; Shang, H.; Jing, X.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Song, G. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Sus Gene Family in Cotton. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brill, E.; van Thournout, M.; White, R.G.; Llewellyn, D.; Campbell, P.M.; Engelen, S.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Arioli, T.; Furbank, R.T. A Novel Isoform of Sucrose Synthase Is Targeted to the Cell Wall during Secondary Cell Wall Synthesis in Cotton Fiber. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ruan, Y.-L.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Furbank, R. Suppression of Sucrose Synthase Gene Expression Represses Cotton Fiber Cell Initiation, Elongation, and Seed Development. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 952–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bai, W.-Q.; Xiao, Y.-H.; Zhao, J.; Song, S.-Q.; Hu, L.; Zeng, J.-Y.; Li, X.-B.; Hou, L.; Luo, M.; Li, D.-M.; et al. Gibberellin Overproduction Promotes Sucrose Synthase Expression and Secondary Cell Wall Deposition in Cotton Fibers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jiang, Y.; Guo, W.; Zhu, H.; Ruan, Y.-L.; Zhang, T. Overexpression of GhSusA1 increases plant biomass and improves cotton fiber yield and quality. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 10, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Xu, S.-M.; Brill, E.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Furbank, R.; Ruan, Y.-L. Overexpression of a Potato Sucrose Synthase Gene in Cotton Accelerates Leaf Expansion, Reduces Seed Abortion, and Enhances Fiber Production. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Ahmed, M.; Iqbal, A.; Latif, A.; Din, S.U.; Sarwar, M.B.; Wang, X.; Rao, A.Q.; Husnain, T.; Shahid, A.A. Overexpression of a Sucrose Synthase Gene Indirectly Improves Cotton Fiber Quality Through Sucrose Cleavage. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 476251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Singh, B.; Cheek, H.D.; Haigler, C.H. A synthetic auxin (NAA) suppresses secondary wall cellulose synthesis and enhances elongation in cultured cotton fiber. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Somerville, C.; Coburn, P.S.; Pillar, C.M.; Jett, B.D.; Haas, W.; Gilmore, M.S. Toward a Systems Approach to Understanding Plant Cell Walls. Science 2004, 306, 2206–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zou, X.; Zhen, Z.; Ge, Q.; Fan, S.; Liu, A.; Gong, W.; Li, J.; Gong, J.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the evolution and expression patterns of the cellulose synthase gene superfamily in Gossypium species. Gene 2018, 646, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, J.; Han, Z.; Chi, J.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Xing, C.; Song, M.; Wu, J.; et al. The cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family in four Gossypium species: phylogenetics, sequence variation and gene expression in relation to fiber quality in Upland cotton. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, H.J.; Murai, N.; Fang, D.; Triplett, B.A. Functional analysis of Gossypium hirsutum cellulose synthase catalytic subunit 4 promoter in transgenic Arabidopsis and cotton tissues. Plant Sci. 2011, 180, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kim, H.J.; Triplett, B.A.; Zhang, H.-B.; Lee, M.-K.; Hinchliffe, D.J.; Li, P.; Fang, D. Cloning and characterization of homeologous cellulose synthase catalytic subunit 2 genes from allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Gene 2012, 494, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, A.; Xia, T.; Xu, W.; Chen, T.; Li, X.; Fan, J.; Wang, R.; Feng, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; et al. An integrative analysis of four CESA isoforms specific for fiber cellulose production between Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense. Planta 2013, 237, 1585–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hu, H.; Zhang, R.; Tang, Y.; Peng, C.; Wu, L.; Feng, S.; Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Du, X.; Peng, L. Cotton CSLD3 restores cell elongation and cell wall integrity mainly by enhancing primary cellulose production in the Arabidopsis cesa6 mutant. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 101, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, X.; Xue, Y.; Guan, Z.; Zhou, C.; Nie, Y.; Men, S.; Wang, Q.; Shen, C.; Zhang, D.; Jin, S.; et al. Structural insights into homotrimeric assembly of cellulose synthase CesA7 from Gossypium hirsutum. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Andrawis, A.; Solomon, M.; Delmer, D.P. Cotton fiber annexins: a potential role in the regulation of callose synthase. Plant J. 1993, 3, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zuo, K. A Cotton Annexin Protein AnxGb6 Regulates Fiber Elongation through Its Interaction with Actin 1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Li, B.; Li, D.-D.; Zhang, J.; Xia, H.; Wang, X.-L.; Li, Y.; Li, X.-B. Cotton Ann G h3 Encoding an Annexin Protein is Preferentially Expressed in Fibers and Promotes Initiation and Elongation of Leaf Trichomes in Transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 902–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, Y.; Deng, T.; Zuo, K. Cotton annexin proteins participate in the establishment of fiber cell elongation scaffold. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e25601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Liang, W.; Fang, L.; Xiang, D.; Hu, Y.; Feng, H.; Chang, L.; Zhang, T. Transcriptome Analysis of Short Fiber Mutant Ligon lintless-1 (Li1) Reveals Critical Genes and Key Pathways in Cotton Fiber Elongation and Leaf Development. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Islam, S.; Zeng, L.; Thyssen, G.N.; Delhom, C.D.; Kim, H.J.; Li, P.; Fang, D.D. Mapping by sequencing in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) line MD52ne identified candidate genes for fiber strength and its related quality attributes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 1071–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, R.; Wang, S.; Ma, D.; Liu, C. Genome-Wide Analysis of LRR-RLK Gene Family in Four Gossypium Species and Expression Analysis during Cotton Development and Stress Responses. Genes 2018, 9, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Dou, L.; Li, Z.; Shen, Q.; Shi, H.; Li, H.; Wang, W.; Zou, C.; Shang, H.; Li, H.; Xiao, G. Genome-wide characterization of the WAK gene family and expression analysis under plant hormone treatment in cotton. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Li, Y.-L.; Sun, J.; Xia, G.-X. Cloning and characterization of a gene for an LRR receptor-like protein kinase associated with cotton fiber development. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2005, 273, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Seifert, G.J.; Roberts, K. The Biology of Arabinogalactan Proteins. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huang, G.-Q.; Xu, W.-L.; Gong, S.-Y.; Li, B.; Wang, X.-L.; Xu, D.; Li, X.-B. Characterization of 19 novel cottonFLAgenes and their expression profiling in fiber development and in response to phytohormones and salt stress. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 134, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Deng, T.; Yao, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Xue, H.; Zuo, K. GhLTPG1, a cotton GPI-anchored lipid transfer protein, regulates the transport of phosphatidylinositol monophosphates and cotton fiber elongation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Canonne, J.; Froidure-Nicolas, S.; Rivas, S. Phospholipases in action during plant defense signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Tang, K.; Liu, J.-Y. Molecular characterization of GhPLDα1 and its relationship with secondary cell wall thickening in cotton fibers. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2016, 49, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Allen, R.D. Opportunities for Engineering Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Cotton Plants. In Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 65, pp. 127–160. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang, G.; Yue, C.; Lu, T.; Sun, L.; Hao, F. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of NADPH oxidase genes in response to ABA and abiotic stresses, and in fibre formation in Gossypium. Peer J 2020, 8, e8404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Huang, Q.-S.; Wang, H.-Y.; Gao, P.; Wang, G.-Y.; Xia, G.-X. Cloning and characterization of a calcium dependent protein kinase gene associated with cotton fiber development. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1869–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The functions of membrane-related genes in cotton fiber development.
Table 1. The functions of membrane-related genes in cotton fiber development.
CategoryGene/Protein/ReagentExpression ProfileFunctionReferences
PM lipidsphosphatidylinositol promote fiber growth[23]
Δ15GhFAD, GhPIS, and GhPIKpreferentially in fibersuppression result in significantly short fiber[23]
FB1 severely block fiber elongation[27]
VLCFAs act upstream of ethylene to promote fiber cell elongation[28]
GhDET2the initiation stage and rapid elongation stage of fiberpromote fiber number and length[30]
GhSMT2-1the rapid elongation stage of fiberoverexpression result in short and thick fiber[31,33]
PM channelsproton-translocating ATPase, vacuole-ATPase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, and major intrinsic proteinthe period of peak expansion of fiberinvolved in turgor regulation[36]
PPaseconstitutively expressed in fiber
GhPIP1-2 and GhcTIP1predominantly expressed during cotton fiber elongationsupporting the rapid influx of water into vacuoles[41]
cotton PIP2 groups down-regulation lead to markedly hindered fiber elongation[42]
GhWBC1highly expressed in developing fiber cellsoverexpression result in short siliques in Arabidopsis[44]
GhVIN1the rapid elongation stage of fiberpromote fiber number and length[46,47,48]
sucrose and K+ transporterconsistent with the transient closure of the PDsrelated to the osmotic and turgor potentials of fibers[37]
GhGluc1high in the short fiber genotypes and weak in the long fiber genotypesrelated to PDs closure[50]
Susconsistent with the transient closure of the PDsrelated to the short fiber cell phenotype of fls mutant[51]
GhSCP2D reduces plasmodesmal permeability and activates sucrose transporter genes[52]
PM proteinsSuSydevelopment-dependent expression profiles in cotton fibercell wall synthesis[54,55,56,57,58]
GhSusA1, potato SuSyimprove cotton fiber quality[59,60,61,62]
GhCesA4SCW synthesis stagecellulose biosynthesis during cotton fiber development[66]
GhCesA2[67]
GhCesA1, GhCesA2, GhCesA7, and GhCesA8 SCW biosynthesis[68,70]
GhCesA3, GhCesA5, GhCesA6, GhCesA9, and GhCesA10 primary cell wall formation
GhCSLD3 primary cell wall synthesis[69]
AnxGb6elongating cotton fibers [72]
AnnGh3, AnnGh4, and AnnGh5preferentially expressed in rapidly elongating fibers [73]
AnxGb5/6 stabilized scaffold for Actin1 organization[74]
WAKhighly expressed in cotton fibers and ovules [78]
GhRLK1SCW synthesis stage [79]
GhFLA1/2/4predominantly expressed in 10 DPA fibers [81]
GhFLA6/14/15/18accumulated at relatively high levels in cotton fibers
GhLTPG1elongating cotton fibers and outer integument of the ovulesknockdown result in reduction in fiber length[82]
GhPLDα1highest level in fibers at 20 DPArelated to secondary cell wall thickening[84]
GhRbohsflowers, some expressed in ovules and fibers [86]
GhCPK1the elongating fiberthe calcium signaling associated with fiber elongation[87]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, F.; Chen, Q.; Huang, L.; Luo, M. Advances about the Roles of Membranes in Cotton Fiber Development. Membranes 2021, 11, 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070471

AMA Style

Xu F, Chen Q, Huang L, Luo M. Advances about the Roles of Membranes in Cotton Fiber Development. Membranes. 2021; 11(7):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Fan, Qian Chen, Li Huang, and Ming Luo. 2021. "Advances about the Roles of Membranes in Cotton Fiber Development" Membranes 11, no. 7: 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070471

APA Style

Xu, F., Chen, Q., Huang, L., & Luo, M. (2021). Advances about the Roles of Membranes in Cotton Fiber Development. Membranes, 11(7), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11070471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop