Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Host Cell Impurity Effects on the Performance of Sterile Filtration Processes for Therapeutic Viruses
Previous Article in Journal
Wearable Crop Sensor Based on Nano-Graphene Oxide for Noninvasive Real-Time Monitoring of Plant Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrodialysis Can Lower the Environmental Impact of Hemodialysis
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Literature Review of Modelling and Experimental Studies of Water Treatment by Adsorption Processes on Nanomaterials

Membranes 2022, 12(4), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040360
by Qusai Ibrahim, Leo Creedon and Salem Gharbia *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Membranes 2022, 12(4), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12040360
Submission received: 2 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 18 March 2022 / Published: 24 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Filtration for Water Reclamation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A literature review of modelling and experimental studies of water treatment by adsorption processes on nanomaterials

Reviewer’s comments:

This work presents a critical review of the latest experimental and simulation methods on wastewater treatment by adsorption on nanomaterials for the removal of pollutants such as bacteria and heavy metals. The review includes the wastewater treatment processes that were carried out using membranes and nanoparticles. But the manuscript lacks explanation regarding major techniques/processes and characterization analysis for wastewater treatment. Not ample explanation regarding the treatment of dyes, pesticides, bacteria, heavy metals have been given. Moreover, the manuscript lacks coherence in writing of paragraphs, has repetition of lines and lacks some major figures.

Here are some major suggestions

  1. The introduction section should incorporate some more insights into the development of adsorption enhanced photocatalysts based systems/membranes for wastewater treatment
  2. The whole review is restricted to some particular nanomaterials for the synthesis of adsorbents/membranes like GO, MoS2, TiO2, and CNTs only. The authors need to explain the majority of metal oxides-based nanocomposites (binary, ternary, quaternary), polymers, and other supports and adsorbents/photocatalysts being used as membranes for wastewater treatment
  3. The authors need to provide a schematic diagram for the nanomaterials being used for the synthesis of membranes as adsorbents/photocatalysts to give an overall outline of review
  4. Authors need to explain the nature and synthesis methods of nanomembranes in text too with a schematic diagram. For a review, a mere single paragraph explanation on this wide topic is not enough. The authors need to explain this in detail
  5. In the topic 2.2 nanomaterials, the paragraph should explain the nature of nanomaterials like semiconductor metal-oxides-based composites, heterojunctions formation, doping, support materials. Besides, their properties explanation like bandgap that makes them suitable for adsorption and photocatalysis should also be present in detail
  6. Wastewater treatment is a multi-dimensional topic that encompasses the removal of dyes, pesticides, heavy metals and bacteria. Authors should explain recent previously published reports regarding adsorbent/photocatalysts membranes
  7. The authors need to add a figure explaining a detailed mechanism of adsorption and removal of pollutants by carbon/zeolite-based nanomembranes
  8. In the photocatalysis section, authors need to explain Fenton, photo Fenton, heterogeneous photocatalysis, ozonolysis processes
  9. Authors should also add 1-2 comprehensive pages regarding the essential characterization techniques for evaluating the synthesis of adsorbents/nanomaterials
  10. In Fig.3 authors need to explain the oxidation-reduction processes being carried out in visible light catalysis
  11. In paragraph 3.2, authors should start explaining with nature of metal oxide semi-conductor materials, their nature as binary and ternary compounds
  12. Tables 3,4, 5, and 6 should be more comprehensive with model pollutants, morphology, removal efficiencies, light sources, etc.
  13. The authors have not explained the kinetic modeling of adsorption/photocatalysis. Authors need to explain the various kinetic models of adsorption and photocatalysis
  14. The conclusion should be more coherent and precise

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper “A literature review of modelling and experimental studies of water treatment by adsorption processes on nanomaterials”  is interesting  but need a lot of work to streamline and improve the present content.

This is a paper for a renowned journal; I wonder why authors are calling it a chapter many times (as if it was prepared for a chapter earlier)

Abstract shall contain the most significant findings of this article to readers,

Why it is precisely indicating “removal of pollutants such as bacteria and heavy metals” in abstract, it should not be that specific in abstract when we are presenting for wastewater in title

Kindly explain -Line 40-41 In other cases, when the consumption of surface water sources is very high, such as rivers and lakes, the  decrease in water levels leads to an increase in the concentration of minerals and pollutants [7].

Figure 1 is not required

Correct the citation of chemical formula - molybdenum disulphide  (MoS2), TiO2, and various other throughout manuscript

Fig.3 quality very poor

Line 135-136, kindly correct statement “Therefore, the adsorption process is one of the most important water filtration processes”

Why the authors want to talk about adsorption from line 135 onwards, when the topic follows the next heading

More detail about the fabrication and characterization of the nanocomposite materials experimentally and by simulation are given in Chapter 2. ?????? define chapter (why this term)

Similarly line 494

Number of language errors line 253

 It would be good to add a column in the last of table 1 for the type of pollutant treatment used?

Illustrations must be very selective and informative of high significance 

Conclusions section is long and shall be concise information as a short summary of the manuscript for the most significant findings

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This review article is interesting, but the literature is not well analyzed. Advanced modeling via physical models of adsorption process should be detailed in the revised version. Please see these references (please note that is not necessary to use these references to improve this review, the important point is to add new part of physical models application).

New physicochemical interpretations for the adsorption of food dyes on chitosan films using statistical physics treatment. Food Chemistry.


Novel insights into the adsorption mechanism of methylene blue onto organo-bentonite: Adsorption isotherms modeling and molecular simulation, Journal of Molecular Liquids

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The author has incorporated most of the changes and the document can be accepted after improvement in English language.

Reviewer 3 Report

Accept

Back to TopTop