Next Article in Journal
Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Castor Oil-Based Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) with Active Agent 1,10-Phenanthroline for Aqueous Pb2+ Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Proof of a Transformation Product Trap Effect with a Membrane Photocatalytic Process for VOC Removal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zinc–Tin Oxide Film as an Earth-Abundant Material and Its Versatile Applications to Electronic and Energy Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbon-Based Transducers for Solid-Contact Calcium Ion-Selective Electrodes: Mesopore and Nitrogen-Doping Effects

Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Sensing Materials & Devices, Center for Advanced Analytical Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(9), 903; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090903
Submission received: 13 August 2022 / Revised: 7 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 19 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensing Membranes)

Abstract

:
Solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs) exhibit great potential in the detection of routine and portable ions which rely on solid-contact (SC) materials for the transduction of ions to electron signals. Carbon-based materials are state-of-the-art SC transducers due to their high electrical double-layer (EDL) capacitance and hydrophobicity. However, researchers have long searched for ways to enhance the interfacial capacitance in order to improve the potential stability. Herein, three representative carbon-based SC materials including nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon (NMC), reduced graphene oxide (RGO), and carbon nanotubes (CNT) were compared. The results disclose that the NMC has the highest EDL capacitance owing to its mesopore structure and N-doping while maintaining high hydrophobicity so that no obvious water-layer effect was observed. The Ca2+-SC-ISEs based on the SC of NMC exhibited high potential stability compared with RGO and CNT. This work offers a guideline for the development of carbon-material-based SC-ISEs through mesoporous and N-doping engineering to improve the interfacial capacitance. The developed NMC-based solid-contact Ca2+-SC-ISE exhibited a Nernstian slope of 26.3 ± 3.1 mV dec−1 ranging from 10 μM to 0.1 M with a detection limit of 3.2 μM. Finally, a practical application using NMC-based SC-ISEs was demonstrated through Ca2+ ion analysis in mineral water and soil leaching solutions.

1. Introduction

Ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) act as a type of classic electrochemical sensor that enable the detection and analyses of over 60 ions [1,2,3,4]. However, traditional liquid-contact ISEs have encountered difficulties in miniaturization and instrumentation [5,6]. To overcome this challenge and satisfy practical requirements, solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs) have been proposed, which extend the application to ion detection in complex environments, for example, marine salts [7,8,9,10], human biofluids [11,12,13], and even biomolecules [14,15,16].
Advances in SC-ISEs stem from the development of state-of-the-art SC materials [17], which involves the two core issues of interfacial capacitance and hydrophobicity [18]. The need for reasonable consideration of capacitance and hydrophobicity was expounded upon in our previous report [19]. In principle, a high interfacial capacitance reduces the effect of ion flux and thus achieves the purpose of stabilizing the potential. Currently, a variety of SC materials have been developed, including conductive polymers (CPs) [20,21,22,23,24], carbon-based materials [17,18], transition metal oxides [25] or sulfides [26], redox couples [27,28,29,30,31] and noble-metal nanoparticles [32,33,34,35]. Among these, CPs bear a large redox capacitance but face interference from water layer and gas effects [36]. Attempts at overcoming this issue have included adjusting the thickness of the CPs [37] and designing hydrophobic CPs [38,39]. Noble metals have a relatively high application value. Carbon-based materials are the most widely used SC materials due to their high electrical double-layer (EDL) capacitance and hydrophobicity. For example, heteroatomic doping and pore-creating engineering present effective procedures for improving the EDL capacitance of carbon materials, particularly in the field of energy storage [40]. A few typical carbon materials, for example, porous carbon [41,42,43,44,45], graphene [46,47,48,49,50], carbon nanotube [51,52,53,54,55] have been used as SC materials in SC-ISEs. However, there remains a lack of guidelines in the field of SC-ISEs with regard to improving the interfacial capacitance for carbon-based SC materials.
In this work, three representative carbon materials were chosen for the Ca2+-SC-ISEs including nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon materials (NMC), reduced graphene oxide materials (RGO) and carbon nanotube materials (CNT). The results demonstrate that the NMC bear the highest capacitance due to mesoporous and N-doping effects. The SC-ISEs based on the SC of NMC showed no obvious water-layer effect and exhibited potential stability compared with RGO and CNT. Finally, the Ca2+ ion present in mineral water and soil-leaching solutions was detected for a proof-of-concept practical application.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Sodium tetrakis [3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] borate (NaTFPB), 2-nitrophenyl octyl ether (NPOE), high-molecular-weight poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC), tetrahydrofuran (THF), calcium ionophore IV, 4-aminoantipyrine, perfluorinated resin solution (Nafion 1100 W-5 wt%) and ethyl alcohol (anhydrous) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Silica was purchased from Cabot. N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and iron nitrate were obtained from Macklin. All aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (>18.2 MΩ cm).
The original soil samples were collected from five different locations near Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center. The collected 10 g soil samples were mixed with 70 mL ultrapure water and ultrasonicated for 1 h. The resulting mixture was centrifuged (10 min at 10,000 rpm) to collect the solution. Finally, the obtained solution was stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator for use. In addition, five different brands of mineral water were randomly purchased from the market for testing.

2.2. Synthesis of Materials

Chemically reduced graphene oxide (RGO) was synthesized via hydrothermal treatment of dialysis-purified graphene oxide (GO) at 160 °C for 3 h, followed by filtration and then freeze-dried under vacuum to obtain the samples. Graphene oxide (GO) was synthesized by the generally used oxidation of graphite. Carbon nanotubes (CNT) were obtained from XFNANO (Nanjing, China). The nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon materials (NMC) were prepared using a silica template method. Briefly, 0.5 g of silica was first dispersed in water by ultrasonication. Next, 0.5 g of 4-aminoantipyrine was added into the silica solution for mixing. After that, 0.5 g of iron nitrate as the polymerization inducer was added and ultrasonicated for around 3 h. The mixture solution was dried in an oven at 85 °C overnight. The powder was placed under heat treatment at 800 °C for 3 h under an Ar atmosphere. Finally, the product was etched in the HF solution to remove iron particles and silica to form the NMC.

2.3. Material Characterizations

Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) models were applied to extract the specific surface area and pore-size distribution data, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Phenom Nano SEM (Phenom Scientific, Tykyo, Japan) at 10 KV and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM-2100F TEM (JEOL, Tykyo, Japan) at 200 KV were carried out to analyze the morphology of three carbon materials. Contact angle tests were conducted using a contact angle apparatus (Zhijia Equipment, Shenzhen, China). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed via Smartlab9K (Rigaku, Tykyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα as the X-ray source. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were gathered by Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi through Al Kα ray at 1486.6 eV (Waltham, MA, USA). Raman spectra were measured by a HORIBA LabRAM HR 800 with an excitation wavelength of 514 nm (HORIBA, Paris, France). The Ion Chromatography (IC) tests were performed using CIC-D120 (Qingdao Shenghan, Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China).

2.4. Electrode Pretreatment

Glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) with a diameter of 5 mm were polished with 0.3 μm alumina powder and ultrasonically washed in water and ethanol (95%), respectively, and dried by N2 flow. The NMC, RGO and CNT solutions contain 10 mg of the sample, 250 μL of Nafion, and 750 μL of ethyl alcohol (NMP instead of RGO), which were sonicated for several hours to ensure complete dispersion. Then, the solution was drop-casted on GCE and dried at 60 °C with 1 mg cm−2 of mass loading.
The Ca2+-ISM cocktail was prepared using 3 mL THF with 117.72 mg of PVC (32.7 wt%), 235.44 mg of NPOE (65.4 wt%), 4.68 mg Calcium ionophore IV (1.3 wt%), and 2.16 mg KTPFB (0.6 wt%). Then, 50 μL of the cocktail was cast on the carbon-material based SC layer and dried at room temperature for 3 h.

2.5. Electrochemical Measurements

Cyclic voltammetry was tested in potential range from 0.1 to 0.6 V at a scan rate of 5 mV/s. Charge–discharge test with a current density of 0.25 A/g was performed in 0.1 M CaCl2 to evaluate the capacitance of NMC, RGO and CNT. Constant-current chronopotentiometry was performed for evaluation of the capacitance of corresponding SC-ISEs with an applied constant current of ±1 nA for 100 s in 0.1 M CaCl2. The above tests were conducted via a CHI660E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai CHI Apparatus Corporation, Shanghai, China) three-electrode system and Gamry reference 600 plus electrochemical workstation (Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA). The working electrodes are the GCE and the auxiliary electrode is a Pt wire. The reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) that is connected to a salt bridge filled with 1 M LiAc.
For the potential response test, Ca2+-SC-ISEs were conditioned in 10−4 M CaCl2 overnight, then conditioned in 10−7 M CaCl2 for 3 h. The electromotive force (EMF) between the indicator and reference electrode was recorded in the target-ion solutions with concentrations ranging from 10−7 M to 10−1 M. Before the water-layer tests, the SC-ISEs were conditioned overnight in 0.1 M CaCl2. The water-layer tests were performed in 0.1 M CaCl2 for 2 h, followed by 0.1 M MgCl2 for 3 h, and finally 0.1 M CaCl2 for 12 h. The ion selectivity coefficients were measured via the separate solution method. In total, five mineral water and five soil-leaching solutions were tested by SC-ISEs and IC. The above potentiometric tests were performed using EMF 6 (Lawson Lab, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Structure Comparison for NMC, RGO and CNT

Figure 1a exhibits the basic structures of the SC-ISEs presenting a typical sandwich model including the solid contact for ion-to-electron signal transduction and ISM for ion recognition. As mentioned, the potential stability of SC-ISEs depends on the properties of the SC layer. In this work, three representative carbon-based SC materials, i.e., nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon materials (NMC), reduced graphene oxide materials (RGO), and carbon nanotube materials (CNT) were proposed as the transduction layers of SC-ISEs (Figure 1b). The morphologies of the three carbon-based SC materials were examined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 1b–d). The NMC reveals an irregular and disorder structure, which forms a local porous characteristic. It is expected that the RGO and CNT show thin 2D planar and nanotubular structures, respectively. Further XRD patterns disclose the crystal structures of the three materials. The CNT exhibits sharp diffraction patterns, suggesting a well-defined crystal structure. The RGO shows a relatively broad diffraction peak at 2θ = 23.8°, which indicates the presence of carbon defects (Figure 1e). The NMC discloses the weakest crystal characteristic with a broad diffraction peak pattern and low intensity. This characteristic confirms the disordered structure of the NMC.
The specific surface areas of NMC, RGO and CNT were determined by the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm (Figure 1f). NMC exhibits type I (H1) hysteresis loops of porous materials. The narrow and relatively uniform pore distribution discloses a typical mesoporous structure [56]. The H2 hysteresis loops appear in the RGO materials, which indicates more complex pore structures usually referred to as ink bottle pores. The volume of adsorbed gas increased at a relatively lower pressure, which demonstrates the existence of micropores. It is observed that CNT belongs to a typical physical adsorption disclosing the near-II adsorption isotherm with H3-type hysteresis loops [57]. The number of adsorbed molecules increase less with increasing gas pressure, which proves that the CNT is a porous solid with fine pores [58]. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) results further show that the NMC has a specific surface area of 675.6 m2 g−1, much higher than RGO (240.9 m2 g−1) and CNT (158.5 m2 g−1). Additionally, it can also be seen that the NMC bears an advantage from the comparison of porosity test results (NMC of 0.84 cm3 g−1 > RGO of 0.26 cm3 g−1 ≈ CNT of 0.28 cm3 g−1). The pore diameter distribution is shown in Figure 1g. RGO and CNT are mainly composed of micropores with pore sizes of around 5 nm. However, the NMC is dominated by mesopores with sizes ranging from 10–30 nm. The mesoporous structure is favorable for ion transport, resulting in an improvement in efficiency of ion-to-electron transduction.
The microstructures are further examined via transmission electron microscopy (TEM). An abundance of mesopores are observed for the NMC (Figure 2a), which is consistent with the BET results (Figure 1g). RGO and CNT exhibit well-defined planar and tubular morphologies. The Raman spectra further examine their defects (Figure 2d). Typical D and G bands are observed between 1000–2000 cm–1. It is found that the ratios of the Raman intensity between the D band and G bands (ID/IG) follow the order, NMC (ID/IG = 1.19) < CNT (ID/IG = 1.34) < RGO (ID/IG = 1.35), which proves that the NMC has relatively less defects compared with RGO and CNT. It should be noted herein that pores are not synonymous with defects. The perfect structure is the graphitic sp2 carbon while the exhibited defect represents a breakdown of the carbon structure at the atomic level, for example, heteroatomic doping. This will be illustrated by the following XPS results. The carbon defect demonstrated could affect the hydrophobicity. Less defects generally offer higher hydrophobicity. As shown in Figure 2g, the water-contact angles follow the order: NMC (127.3°) > CNT (118.1°) > RGO (107.0°). This result corresponds well with the Raman tests and confirm a relatively complete structure for the NMC. The hydrophobicity is a crucial parameter for the water-layer effect, which will be discussed in the next section.
The capacitance is affected by both porous structure and element doping for the carbon materials. In addition, the above discussed carbon defects have strong effects on the hydrophobicity. Therefore, XPS was used to further analyze the chemical bond information. The XPS spectra of the C 1s show two main doublets corresponding to sp2 and sp3 carbon bonds, respectively (Figure 2e). The typical oxygen-containing groups were observed in all three materials. However, the RGO showed the highest oxygen content, followed by CNT, and NMC. The less hydrophilic the oxygen-containing functional groups, the stronger the hydrophobicity [15]. This result is consistent with the contact angles. In addition, C-N groups appeared in both NMC and RGO. The N element in RGO originated from the precursor of GO since the HNO3 was used for the oxidation of graphite. Further N 1s spectra are shown in Figure 2f. The N 1s spectrum of NMC can be deconvoluted into four configurations, which are derived for pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, graphitic N, and N-oxides, respectively. However, the RGO shows a dominated pyridinic N configuration while no N element is observed in the CNT. Since nitrogen contains one more electron than carbon, local electron-rich sites are expected to appear as nitrogen atoms in the carbon matrix [59]. For example, pyridinic N and pyrrolic N contribute one and two p-electrons to the carbon matrix, respectively, thus pyridinic N and pyrrolic N increase the specific capacitance [59], which will be confirmed in conjunction with the capacitance test in the following section. Overall, the above results prove that NMC has the highest specific surface area with mesoporous structure and abundant N-doping, which would be beneficial to improving the EDL capacitance and ion-to-electron transduction.

3.2. Capacitance Evaluation

Following the discussion of the structure and composition for the three carbon-based SC materials, their capacitances will be examined in this section. Figure 3a exhibits the ion response mechanisms for the EDL capacitance-type SC-ISEs. Three phase boundaries of GC/SC, SC/ISM, and ISM/aqueous solution (ISM/aq) interfaces are composed. The EMF equates the sum of potentials at these three interfaces. The potential at the GC/SC interface is close to zero since most EDL capacitance-based SC materials have high electrical conductivity (electric contact) (Figure 3b). The potential at the ISM/aq interface is determined by the Nernstian equation, which depends on the activity of target ions. Therefore, the potential stability for EDL-capacitance-type SC-ISEs strongly relies on the potential variation at the SC/ISM interface. However, this interfacial potential could not be defined because there is no charge transfer reaction. It can only determine the potential variation, which is represented by Δ E I S M S C =∆Q/C, where ∆Q is the passed charge and C is the EDL capacitance. Therefore, capacitance is a decisive factor in maintaining the potential stability of SC-ISEs. For this purpose, the capacitance of three SC materials were examined in detail.
Figure 3 shows the CVs of three types of SC materials in aqueous (0.1 M CaCl2). It can be clearly observed that the NMC has the largest current density, much higher than RGO and CNT, indicating a higher capacitance. It should be noted that the mass loading is the same for the three carbon-based SC materials (1 mg cm–2). Galvanostatic charge–discharge tests were used to further evaluate their specific capacitance at a current density of 0.25 A g–1 (Figure 3d). Obviously, the charge–discharge time of NMC is longer than that of RGO and CNT, which demonstrates that NMC can store more charge. The specific capacitance (Cs) is calculated by the equation: Cs = I × Δt/ΔV, where I is the applied current density (0.25 A g–1); Δt is the average time for the charge and discharge, and ΔV is the potential window. The calculated Cs follows the order: NMC (106.6 F g−1) > RGO (37.7 F g−1) > CNT (13.1 F g−1). It is found that the capacitance of NMC is much higher than that of RGO and CNT.
After evaluation of the capacitance of SC materials, the capacitance of fabricated Ca2+-SC-ISEs were further evaluated through chronopotentiometry under the application of a current at ±1 mA (Figure 3e). The SC-ISEs were prepared by coating the SC-modified GCE with Ca2+-ISM (see experimental section for details). The specific capacitance was determined: NMC (1.461 F g−1) > CNT (0.204 F g−1) ≈ RGO (0.197 F g−1). The NMC-based Ca2+-SC-ISE again demonstrates the highest capacitance. The results for specific capacitance and hydrophobicity are summarized in Figure 3f. The NMC shows the highest capacitance and strongest hydrophobicity. Based on the above analysis, the mesoporous structure and N-doping are beneficial to increasing the capacitance thus allowing inhibition of the polarization effect of the external current on the electrode.

3.3. Analytical Performances

After evaluating capacitance, the potentiometric responses of the Ca2+-SC-ISEs based on three SC materials were further examined (Figure 4a,b). The sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) for NMC-based, RGO-based and CNT-based Ca2+-SC-ISEs were determined as 26.3 ± 3.1 mV dec−1/10−5.5 M, 26.5 ± 4.9 mV dec−1/10−5.6 M, and 27.4 ± 6.8 mV dec−1/10−5.6 M, respectively. Three types of Ca2+-SC-ISEs exhibit nearly Nernstian responses. There are little differences in the sensitivity and LOD because the primary response is mainly dependent on the ISM.
The formation of water layer at the SC/ISM interface cause potential drifts and even leads to the failure of ISM. Water-layer tests were conducted through the separation solution method (Figure 4c). It is found that the RGO-based Ca2+-SC-ISE and CNT-based Ca2+-SC-ISE show obvious potential drifts in the second stage (solution was changed from 0.1 M CaCl2 to 0.1 M MgCl2) and the third stage (back to 0.1 M CaCl2). However, the potential of NMC-based Ca2+-SC-ISE keeps stable in the three stages, which indicates no water layer existed. According to the above discussion, CNT and RGO exhibit insufficient capacitance and hydrophobicity. Therefore, both exhibit similar water-layer results. NMC has good capacitance and hydrophobicity, thus avoiding the water-layer effect. The above results suggest that the effects of capacitance and hydrophobicity should be reasonably considered in the development of SC materials. Figure 4d demonstrates a long-term potential stability. The potential drifts over 7 days were 66.9 ± 14.5 μV h−1 (NMC), 189.8 ± 3.4 μV h−1 (RGO) and 160.3 ± 31.9 μV h−1 (CNT), respectively. These results confirm the superiority of NMC as an ion-to-electron transducer layer, which stems from the high capacitance and hydrophobicity. Compared with other studies for the detection of Ca2+, the NMC-based SC-ISEs have comparable sensitivity, detection limit and stability (Table S1). Significantly, the NMC has relatively excellent stability in carbon-based SC-ISEs, which may provide guidance for the preparation of carbon-based SC-ISEs.

3.4. Calcium Detection in Real Samples

The calcium ion is an essential element that affects the natural circulation and metabolism in the human body [60]. Determination of the calcium ion plays an important role in the clinical diagnosis of various diseases such as fractures and hypercalcemia. Moreover, calcium ions also play an important structural role in the cell wall and membrane as counter-cations of inorganic and organic anions. Additionally, calcium deficiency or calcium excess will lead to a costly dysregulation in horticulture. Therefore, calcium detection has great social value and scientific significance [61,62].
In this work, a proof-of-concept application of Ca2+ ion analysis in mineral water and soil-leaching solutions was demonstrated by using NMC-based SC-ISEs. The above results demonstrate the NMC-based Ca2+-SC-ISE shows better analytical performances, and the selectivity was first examined by using the separation solution method. The potentials in target Ca2+ ions and interfering ions were separately measured (Figure 5a). Apparently, the sensor shows the highest potential for Ca2+, indicating good selectivity. Corresponding selectivity coefficients (log Kij) were further calculated via the equation l o g K i , j p o t = ( E j E i ) Z i F 2.303 R T + l o g a i a j z i / z j (where Ei and Ej are the potentials in the target and interfering ions, respectively). The results are presented in Figure 5b. It is found that the log Kij values toward interfering ions are all less than –3, which confirms that the sensor can be used for the detection of actual samples. Moreover, the Ca2+ concentration in five kinds of mineral waters and soil-leaching solutions was tested with the prepared sensors. Each sample was assessed by three individual Ca2+-SC-ISEs. The detected results were compared with IC, and the results are shown in Figure 5c,d. As can be seen, the two measurement results are basically consistent, proving that the ion-selective electrode can be used for practical sample analysis. In short, the fabricated sensors can quickly and accurately detect Ca2+ levels in drinking water and soil solutions. In the future, these promising SC-ISEs can be combined with electronic integration technology and internet-based software to build an ion-monitoring platform.

4. Conclusions

Three representative carbon-based SC materials including NMC, RGO, and CNT and the effect on the performances of Ca2+-SC-ISEs were examined in detail. It was demonstrated that the interfacial capacitance can be improved effectively via mesoporous and N-doping engineering. The mesopore structure allows rapid diffusion of ions and an increased specific surface area. Therefore, NMC with both high capacitance and hydrophobicity results in the effective inhibition of water-layer formation. The potentiometric Ca2+ sensors fabricated based on NMC show a Nernstian slope, excellent reproducibility and good potential stability. The prepared SC-ISEs were used for the ion analysis of mineral water and soil-leaching solution. This work demonstrates mesoporous and element-doping engineering as an effective strategy to enhance the interfacial capacitance and further improve the potential stability of SC-ISEs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes12090903/s1, Table S1: Comparison of the potentiometric performance of the NMC-based SC-ISEs with the reported Ca2+-SC-ISEs. References [26,61,62,63,64,65] have been cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z.; methodology, Y.Z.; validation, Y.Z., Y.T. and R.L.; formal analysis, Y.Z., S.G., T.H., J.X., H.L. and X.X.; resources, Y.B. and Y.M.; software, Y.Z., Y.M. and Y.B.; investigation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and Y.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., S.G. and L.Z.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, L.Z. and L.N.; project administration, L.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21974031 and U2006208), Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (2019B010933001) and the Science and Technology Research Project of Guangzhou (202102020787, 202102020622 and 202201000002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Potentiometric ion sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent advances in solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: Functional materials, transduction mechanisms, and development trends. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4405–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zdrachek, E.; Bakker, E. Potentiometric Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 72–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cheong, Y.H.; Ge, L.; Lisak, G. Highly reproducible solid contact ion selective electrodes: Emerging opportunities for potentiometry-A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1162, 338304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anastasova-Ivanova, S.; Mattinen, U.; Radu, A.; Bobacka, J.; Lewenstam, A.; Migdalski, J.; Danielewskic, M.; Diamond, D. Development of miniature all-solid-state potentiometric sensing system. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2010, 146, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jaramillo, E.A.; Noell, A.C. Development of Miniature Solid Contact Ion Selective Electrodes for in situ Instrumentation. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 1896–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Athavale, R.; Kokorite, I.; Dinkel, C.; Bakker, E.; Wehrli, B.; Crespo, G.A.; Brand, A. In Situ Ammonium Profiling Using Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes in Eutrophic Lakes. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11990–11997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Crespo, G.A. Recent Advances in Ion-selective membrane electrodes for in situ environmental water analysis. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 245, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G.A. All-solid-state potentiometric sensors: A new wave for in situ aquatic research. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 10, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qi, L.; Liang, R.; Jiang, T.; Qin, W. Anti-fouling polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 150, 116572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. van de Velde, L.; d’Angremont, E.; Olthuis, W. Solid contact potassium selective electrodes for biomedical applications—A review. Talanta 2016, 160, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parrilla, M.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G.A. Wearable potentiometric ion sensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lyu, Y.; Gan, S.; Bao, Y.; Zhong, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Yang, G.; Niu, L. Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes: Response Mechanisms, Transducer Materials and Wearable Sensors. Membranes 2020, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Duezguen, A.; Maroto, A.; Mairal, T.; O’Sullivan, C.; Rius, F.X. Solid-contact potentiometric aptasensor based on aptamer functionalized carbon nanotubes for the direct determination of proteins. Analyst 2010, 135, 1037–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ding, J.; Qin, W. Recent advances in potentiometric biosensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 124, 115803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lv, E.; Li, Y.; Ding, J.; Qin, W. Magnetic-Field-Driven Extraction of Bioreceptors into Polymeric Membranes for Label-Free Potentiometric Biosensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2609–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, M.-R.; Li, X.-G. Highly sensing and transducing materials for potentiometric ion sensors with versatile applicability. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 125, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, J.; Stein, A.; Buehlmann, P. Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 76, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Zhong, L.; Gan, S.; Tang, Y.; Qiu, S.; Lyu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Niu, L. Defective vs high-quality graphene for solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: Effects of capacitance and hydrophobicity. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 129, 107091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bobacka, J. Potential stability of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes using conducting polymers as ion-to-electron transducers. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4932–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Potentiometric ion sensors based on conducting polymers. Electroanalysis 2003, 15, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bobacka, J. Conducting polymer-based solid-state ion-selective electrodes. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vanamo, U.; Bobacka, J. Electrochemical control of the standard potential of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes having a conducting polymer as ion-to-electron transducer. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 122, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bahro, C.; Goswami, S.; Gernhart, S.; Koley, D. Calibration-free Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrode Based on a Polarized PEDOT/PEDOT-S-Doped Copolymer as Back Contact. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 8302–8308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zeng, X.; Qin, W. A solid-contact potassium-selective electrode with MoO2 microspheres as ion-to-electron transducer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 982, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Qin, W. All-Solid-State Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Electrodes Based on NiCo(2)S(4)as a Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 3574–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, M.; Gan, S.; Cai, B.; Li, F.; Ma, W.; Han, D.; Niu, L. Effective Solid Contact for Ion-Selective Electrodes: Tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate (TB-) Anions Doped Nanocluster Films. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3480–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zou, X.U.; Cheong, J.H.; Taitt, B.J.; Buehlmann, P. Solid Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes with a Well-Controlled Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Buffer Layer. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9350–9355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zou, X.U.; Zhen, X.V.; Cheong, J.H.; Buehlmann, P. Calibration-Free Ionophore-Based Ion-Selective Electrodes With a Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Couple-Based Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 8687–8692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jaworska, E.; Naitana, M.L.; Stelmach, E.; Pomarico, G.; Wojciechowski, M.; Bulska, E.; Maksymiuk, K.; Paolesse, R.; Michalska, A. Introducing Cobalt(II) Porphyrin/Cobalt(III) Corrole Containing Transducers for Improved Potential Reproducibility and Performance of All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 7107–7114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhen, X.V.; Rousseau, C.R.; Buhlmann, P. Redox Buffer Capacity of Ion-Selective Electrode Solid Contacts Doped with Organometallic Complexes. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 11000–11007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jaworska, E.; Wojcik, M.; Kisiel, A.; Mieczkowski, J.; Michalska, A. Gold nanoparticles solid contact for ion-selective electrodes of highly stable potential readings. Talanta 2011, 85, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Paczosa-Bator, B.; Cabaj, L.; Piech, R.; Skupien, K. Potentiometric Sensors with Carbon Black Supporting Platinum Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10255–10261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.; Yin, T.; Qin, W. An effective solid contact for an all-solid-state polymeric membrane Cd2+-selective electrode: Three-dimensional porous graphene-mesoporous platinum nanoparticle composite. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2017, 239, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Criscuolo, F.; Taurino, I.; Stradolini, F.; Carrara, S.; De Micheli, G. Highly-stable Li+ ion-selective electrodes based on noble metal nanostructured layers as solid-contacts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1027, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vazquez, M.; Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Influence of oxygen and carbon dioxide on the electrochemical stability of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) used as ion-to-electron transducer in all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2002, 82, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guzinski, M.; Jarvis, J.M.; Perez, F.; Pendley, B.D.; Lindner, E.; De Marco, R.; Crespo, G.A.; Acres, R.G.; Walker, R.; Bishop, J. PEDOT(PSS) as Solid Contact for Ion-Selective Electrodes: The Influence of the PEDOT(PSS) Film Thickness on the Equilibration Times. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3508–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guzinski, M.; Jarvis, J.M.; D’Orazio, P.; Izadyar, A.; Pendley, B.D.; Lindner, E. Solid-Contact pH Sensor without CO2 Interference with a Superhydrophobic PEDOT-C-14 as Solid Contact: The Ultimate “Water Layer” Test. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 8468–8475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, N.; Papp, S.; Lindfors, T.; Hofler, L.; Latonen, R.-M.; Gyurcsanyi, R.E. Pre-Polarized Hydrophobic Conducting Polymer Solid-Contact Ion Selective Electrodes with Improved Potential Reproducibility. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2598–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar, S.; Saeed, G.; Zhu, L.; Hui, K.N.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. 0D to 3D carbon-based networks combined with pseudocapacitive electrode material for high energy density supercapacitor: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lai, C.-Z.; Fierke, M.A.; Stein, A.; Buehlmann, P. Ion-selective electrodes with three-dimensionally ordered macroporous carbon as the solid contact. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 4621–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lai, C.-Z.; Joyer, M.M.; Fierke, M.A.; Petkovich, N.D.; Stein, A.; Buhlmann, P. Subnanomolar detection limit application of ion-selective electrodes with three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) carbon solid contacts. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2009, 13, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fierke, M.A.; Lai, C.-Z.; Buhlmann, P.; Stein, A. Effects of Architecture and Surface Chemistry of Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Carbon Solid Contacts on Performance of Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ye, J.; Li, F.; Gan, S.; Jiang, Y.; An, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, L. Using sp(2)-C dominant porous carbon sub-micrometer spheres as solid transducers in ion-selective electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 50, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, T.; Yin, B.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Pang, H.; Song, J.; Wu, S. Porous carbon-based robust, durable, and flexible electrochemical device for K+ detection in sweat. Analyst 2022, 147, 1144–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ying, Y. Development of an all-solid-state potassium ion-selective electrode using graphene as the solid-contact transducer. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 1529–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hernandez, R.; Riu, J.; Bobacka, J.; Valles, C.; Jimenez, P.; Benito, A.M.; Maser, W.K.; Xavier Rius, F. Reduced Graphene Oxide Films as Solid Transducers in Potentiometric All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 22570–22578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, F.; Ye, J.; Zhou, M.; Gan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Han, D.; Niu, L. All-solid-state potassium-selective electrode using graphene as the solid contact. Analyst 2012, 137, 618–623. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Ying, Y.; Wu, J. Application of Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide on Screen-Printed Ion-Selective Electrode. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3473–3479. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yeung, K.K.; Li, J.; Huang, T.; Hosseini, I.I.; Al Mahdi, R.; Alam, M.M.; Sun, H.; Mahshid, S.; Yang, J.; Ye, T.T.; et al. Utilizing Gradient Porous Graphene Substrate as the Solid-Contact Layer To Enhance Wearable Electrochemical Sweat Sensor Sensitivity. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 6647–6654. [Google Scholar]
  51. Crespo, G.A.; Macho, S.; Xavier Rius, F. Ion-selective electrodes using carbon nanotubes as ion-to-electron transducers. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Crespo, G.A.; Macho, S.; Bobacka, J.; Rius, F.X. Transduction Mechanism of Carbon Nanotubes in Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xavier Rius-Ruiz, F.; Crespo, G.A.; Bejarano-Nosas, D.; Blondeau, P.; Riu, J.; Xavier Rius, F. Potentiometric Strip Cell Based on Carbon Nanotubes as Transducer Layer: Toward Low-Cost Decentralized Measurements. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 8810–8815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yuan, D.; Anthis, A.H.C.; Afshar, M.G.; Pankratova, N.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G.A.; Bakker, E. All-Solid-State Potentiometric Sensors with a Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Inner Transducing Layer for Anion Detection in Environmental Samples. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 8640–8645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Roy, S.; David-Pur, M.; Hanein, Y. Carbon Nanotube-Based Ion Selective Sensors for Wearable Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35169–35177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Thommes, M. Physical Adsorption Characterization of Nanoporous Materials. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2010, 82, 1059–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abidin, A.F.Z.; Loh, K.S.; Wong, W.Y.; Mohamad, A.B.; Puspasari, I. Effect of carbon precursor and initial pH on cobalt-doped carbon xerogel for oxygen reduction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 11047–11055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cha, J.H.; Shin, G.J.; Kang, M.J.; Lee, H.I.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.J. A study on the effect of electron acceptor-donor interactions on the mechanical and interfacial properties of carbon black/natural rubber composites. Compos. Pt. B-Eng. 2018, 136, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, H.; Yang, D.; Lau, A.; Ma, T.; Lin, H.; Jia, B. Hybridized Graphene for Supercapacitors: Beyond the Limitation of Pure Graphene. Small 2021, 17, 2007311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Park, C.; Yoon, H.; Abu Zahed, M.; Zhang, S.; Yoon, S.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.; Park, J. A Highly Stable and Flexible Ca2+ Ion-Selective Sensor Based on Treated PEDOT:PSS Transducing Laser. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 11213–11221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hernandez, R.; Riu, J.; Rius, F.X. Determination of calcium ion in sap using carbon nanotube-based ion-selective electrodes. Analyst 2010, 135, 1979–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shao, Y.Z.; Yao, Y.; Jiang, C.M.; Zhao, F.N.; Liu, X.X.; Ying, Y.B.; Ping, J.F. Two-dimensional MXene nanosheets (types Ti3C2Tx and Ti2CTx) as new ion-to-electron transducers in solid-contact calcium ion-selective electrodes. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jiang, C.M.; Yao, Y.; Cai, Y.L.; Ping, J.F. All-solid-state potentiometric sensor using single-walled carbon nanohorns as transducer. Sens. Actuator B-Chem. 2019, 283, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zeng, X.Z.; Qin, W. A solid-contact Ca2+-selective electrode based on an inorganic redox buffer of Ag@AgCl/1-tetradecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride as ion-to-electron transducer. Talanta 2020, 209, 120570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kou, L.J.; Fu, M.L.; Liang, R.N. Solid-contact Ca2+-selective electrodes based on two-dimensional black phosphorus as ion-to-electron transducers. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 43905–43908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Carbon-based solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs). (a) A schematic illustration of SC-ISEs based on SC materials of NMC, RGO and CNT. (bd) SEM images of NMC, RGO and CNT. (e) XRD patterns for NMC, RGO and CNT. (f) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (g) Pore-size distributions of NMC, RGO and CNT.
Figure 1. Carbon-based solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (SC-ISEs). (a) A schematic illustration of SC-ISEs based on SC materials of NMC, RGO and CNT. (bd) SEM images of NMC, RGO and CNT. (e) XRD patterns for NMC, RGO and CNT. (f) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (g) Pore-size distributions of NMC, RGO and CNT.
Membranes 12 00903 g001
Figure 2. Structure comparison between NMC, RGO, CNT. (ac) TEM images of NMC, RGO and CNT. (d) Raman spectra for NMC, RGO and CNT. (e-f) XPS spectra in the regions of (e) C 1s and (f) N 1s spectra for NMC, RGO and CNT. (g) Contact angles for NMC, RGO and CNT.
Figure 2. Structure comparison between NMC, RGO, CNT. (ac) TEM images of NMC, RGO and CNT. (d) Raman spectra for NMC, RGO and CNT. (e-f) XPS spectra in the regions of (e) C 1s and (f) N 1s spectra for NMC, RGO and CNT. (g) Contact angles for NMC, RGO and CNT.
Membranes 12 00903 g002
Figure 3. Capacitance evaluation. (a) Electric-double-layer (EDL) capacitance-based SC-ISEs which contain three phase boundaries including GC/SC, SC/ISM, and ISM/aq interfaces and (b) the corresponding phase interfacial potentials. (c) Cyclic voltammetry curves for SC materials (NMC, RGO, CNT) in 0.1 M CaCl2. (d) Corresponding charge–discharge tests of SC materials under a current density of 0.25 A g−1. (e) Chronopotentiometry tests for the corresponding Ca2+-SC-ISEs based on NMC, RGO and CNT SC materials. (f) Summary of the capacitances of the SC materials and SC-ISEs and correlation with hydrophobicity (contact angles). The error bars for the SC-ISEs chronopotentiometry tests were calculated using three individual electrodes.
Figure 3. Capacitance evaluation. (a) Electric-double-layer (EDL) capacitance-based SC-ISEs which contain three phase boundaries including GC/SC, SC/ISM, and ISM/aq interfaces and (b) the corresponding phase interfacial potentials. (c) Cyclic voltammetry curves for SC materials (NMC, RGO, CNT) in 0.1 M CaCl2. (d) Corresponding charge–discharge tests of SC materials under a current density of 0.25 A g−1. (e) Chronopotentiometry tests for the corresponding Ca2+-SC-ISEs based on NMC, RGO and CNT SC materials. (f) Summary of the capacitances of the SC materials and SC-ISEs and correlation with hydrophobicity (contact angles). The error bars for the SC-ISEs chronopotentiometry tests were calculated using three individual electrodes.
Membranes 12 00903 g003
Figure 4. Performance comparison of NMC-, RGO- and CNT-based Ca2+-SC-ISEs. (a) Potential response measurements through increasing the concentration of Ca2+ in the solution. (b) Linear calibration curves of Ca2+ responses. (c) Water-layer tests. (d) Long-term stability monitoring for 7 days. The potential drifts were calculated according to the potential differences between the maximal and minimal potentials during the whole test time. The error bars reflect the results of three individual measurements.
Figure 4. Performance comparison of NMC-, RGO- and CNT-based Ca2+-SC-ISEs. (a) Potential response measurements through increasing the concentration of Ca2+ in the solution. (b) Linear calibration curves of Ca2+ responses. (c) Water-layer tests. (d) Long-term stability monitoring for 7 days. The potential drifts were calculated according to the potential differences between the maximal and minimal potentials during the whole test time. The error bars reflect the results of three individual measurements.
Membranes 12 00903 g004
Figure 5. Calcium detection in real samples. (a) Potential measurements at a concentration of 0.1 M for other interfering ions (Na+, K+, NH4+, Mg2+) and target ion (Ca2+) by three individual measurements which are presented in different colors. (b) Selectivity coefficients obtained via the separation solution method. (c) Calcium-ion detection in mineral water and (d) soil-leaching solutions via the SC-ISEs and Ion Chromatography (IC).
Figure 5. Calcium detection in real samples. (a) Potential measurements at a concentration of 0.1 M for other interfering ions (Na+, K+, NH4+, Mg2+) and target ion (Ca2+) by three individual measurements which are presented in different colors. (b) Selectivity coefficients obtained via the separation solution method. (c) Calcium-ion detection in mineral water and (d) soil-leaching solutions via the SC-ISEs and Ion Chromatography (IC).
Membranes 12 00903 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Liang, R.; Zhong, L.; Xu, J.; Lu, H.; Xu, X.; Han, T.; Bao, Y.; Ma, Y.; et al. Carbon-Based Transducers for Solid-Contact Calcium Ion-Selective Electrodes: Mesopore and Nitrogen-Doping Effects. Membranes 2022, 12, 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090903

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Tang Y, Liang R, Zhong L, Xu J, Lu H, Xu X, Han T, Bao Y, Ma Y, et al. Carbon-Based Transducers for Solid-Contact Calcium Ion-Selective Electrodes: Mesopore and Nitrogen-Doping Effects. Membranes. 2022; 12(9):903. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yirong, Yitian Tang, Rongfeng Liang, Lijie Zhong, Jiexian Xu, Huici Lu, Xiaofeng Xu, Tingting Han, Yu Bao, Yingming Ma, and et al. 2022. "Carbon-Based Transducers for Solid-Contact Calcium Ion-Selective Electrodes: Mesopore and Nitrogen-Doping Effects" Membranes 12, no. 9: 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090903

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Tang, Y., Liang, R., Zhong, L., Xu, J., Lu, H., Xu, X., Han, T., Bao, Y., Ma, Y., Gan, S., & Niu, L. (2022). Carbon-Based Transducers for Solid-Contact Calcium Ion-Selective Electrodes: Mesopore and Nitrogen-Doping Effects. Membranes, 12(9), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12090903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop