Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Conductivity Stability of Electrolytic Membranes of Scandia Stabilized Zirconia Co-Doped with Ytterbia
Previous Article in Journal
An Electrochemistry and Computational Study at an Electrified Liquid–Liquid Interface for Studying Beta-Amyloid Aggregation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrophoretic Deposition and Characterization of Thin-Film Membranes Li7La3Zr2O12
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/membranes13060585
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Magnetron Sputtered Single-Layer SDC and Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolytes

by
Andrey Solovyev
1,*,
Anna Shipilova
1,2 and
Egor Smolyanskiy
3
1
Institute of High Current Electronics SB RAS, 634055 Tomsk, Russia
2
Department of Physics, National Research Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
3
School of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(6), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13060585
Submission received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 1 June 2023 / Accepted: 3 June 2023 / Published: 5 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fabrication, Characterization and Application of Organic/Inorganic Film Membranes and Advanced Materials (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Samarium-doped ceria (SDC) is considered as an alternative electrolyte material for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) because its conductivity is higher than that of commonly used yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ). The paper compares the properties of anode-supported SOFCs with magnetron sputtered single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC thin-film electrolyte, with the YSZ blocking layer 0.5, 1, and 1.5 μm thick. The thickness of the upper and lower SDC layers of the multilayer electrolyte are constant and amount to 3 and 1 μm, respectively. The thickness of single-layer SDC electrolyte is 5.5 μm. The SOFC performance is studied by measuring current–voltage characteristics and impedance spectra in the range of 500–800 °C. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy are used to investigate the structure of the deposited electrolyte and other fuel cell layers. SOFCs with the single-layer SDC electrolyte show the best performance at 650 °C. At this temperature, open circuit voltage and maximum power density are 0.8 V and 651 mW/cm2, respectively. The formation of the SDC electrolyte with the YSZ blocking layer improves the open circuit voltage up to 1.1 V and increases the maximum power density at the temperatures over 600 °C. It is shown that the optimal thickness of the YSZ blocking layer is 1 µm. The fuel cell with the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte, with the layer thicknesses of 3/1/1 µm, has the maximum power density of 2263 and 1132 mW/cm2 at 800 and 650 °C, respectively.

1. Introduction

In recent years, research related to lowering the operating temperature of solid oxide fuel cells has become very popular. Development of intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFC) induces a number of advantages. Such conditions widen opportunities for choosing materials to manufacture IT-SOFCs, improving their durability and increasing attractiveness to consumers [1]. However, the lower operating temperature causes many problems. The main problems are associated with growing ohmic and polarization resistances of the fuel cell. The increase in the area-specific resistance (ASR) of fuel cells is conditioned by thermal activation properties of components [2,3]. Application of mixed ionic–electronic conducting materials as the cathode leads to an acceleration of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and improvement in the fuel cell performance [4,5,6,7]. As for the electrolyte, its thickness must be as thin as possible. Also, materials with high ionic conductivity are preferably used for the electrolyte to increase the SOFCs’ efficiency [3,8,9,10].
Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) is a commonly used electrolyte material. It demonstrates good ionic conductivity at high (above 800 °C) temperature and high ionic transference number in both oxidizing and reducing atmospheres. The YSZ use in IT-SOFCs is, however, difficult in the operating temperature range of 600 to 800 °C, since YSZ ionic conductivity drastically lowers with decreasing operating temperature. Such conditions require alternative thin-film electrolytes which have higher oxygen-ionic conductivity than YSZ. Candidates for such solid electrolytes include cerium oxide (CeO2) doped with rare earth or alkaline elements. According to [11], Gd2O3 and Sm2O3 are most-often used as dopant impurities. GDC and SDC show the highest ionic conductivity among cerium-based oxides due to relatively equal ionic radii of dopants Sm3+, Gd3+, and Ce4+ [12,13]. However, doped ceria has one drawback associated with its oxidation–reduction instability. In a hydrogen atmosphere, at high (above 650 °C) operating temperatures, cerium partially reduces, viz., Ce (IV) → Ce (III), which leads to the appearance of mixed ionic–electronic conduction. As a result, the open circuit voltage (OCV) of the fuel cell reduces, and the increased electronic conductivity can lead to the short-circuit problem in the SOFC [14].
Different approaches are used to improve the stability of doped CeO2 in a reducing atmosphere and further enhance its conductivity. The focus of recent research is, for example, on triple-doped ceria-based materials such as Ce1−x(La1/3Sm1/3Gd1/3)xO2−δ (LSG) [15,16], Ce0.8Sm0.12Pr0.08O2−δ [17], Ce0.8Nd0.18Ca0.02O1.89 [18], and Ce0.83Dy0.14Ca0.03O1.90 [19]. GDC co-doped with rare earth elements (CeO2–8Gd2O3–2Eu2O3 (Eu–GDC) and CeO2–8Gd2O3–2Nd2O3 (Nd–GDC)) are synthesized and studied in [20]. Such multicomponent compositions are characterized by an enhanced total ionic conductivity compared to the ionic conductivity of single-doped ceria materials. The literature shows detailed studies of the microstructure, phase composition, and conductivity of these materials. However, these compositions are rather complex and require detailed study of their stability and efficiency, including their application as electrolyte in a real device, namely, an SOFC.
Mishima et al. [21] showed that the formation of a YSZ- and SDC-containing composite electrolyte improved the SOFC output voltage. The OCV of the fuel cell with biphasic electrolyte was significantly higher (~1.1 V) than that of the SDC electrolyte (0.89 V). Incorporation of the SDC grains into the YSZ matrix proved to be effective for reducing the overall internal resistance of the cell. Raghvendra and Singh [22] demonstrated a significant decrease in the electrode polarization when adding the SDC phase into the YSZ electrolyte, and the electrical conductivity of YSZ–SDC was higher when compared with YSZ electrolyte at 400–700 °C. Thus, after the formation of binary composite electrolytes, the SOFC performance could be expected to be higher than in SOFCs with single SDC or YSZ electrolytes.
One more approach to increase the doped CeO2 stability in a reducing atmosphere was described in [23,24,25,26], which demonstrated the application of a thin YSZ blocking layer between anodes and CeO2-based electrolyte. Eguchi et al. [27] found that OCV of the fuel cell with YSZ-coated SDC approached the theoretical OCV value of the fuel cell with YSZ electrolyte. The maximum power density of fuel cell with YSZ-coated SDC electrolyte was 320 mW/cm2 at 800 °C, which is more than two times higher than that (120 mW/cm2) for the SOFC with the single-layer YSZ electrolyte at the same temperature.
The high ionic conductivity and low reactivity with electrode materials of CeO2-based electrolytes [28] create a promising approach for electrolyte fabrication in the form of a multilayer thin-film structure. For example, the application of ZrO2-based thin-film electrolyte has been performed between two layers of doped CeO2, viz., GDC/ScSZ/GDC [29] or GDC/YSZ/GDC [26,30]. Remarkable power densities of 2580 mW/cm2 at 800 °C and 2100 mW/cm2 at 650 °C were obtained in [26,30] for SOFCs with the GDC/YSZ/GDC thin-film electrolyte. This multilayer structure based on YSZ and SDC electrolytes has not been implemented until the present day. Considering such striking aspects of ceria-based oxides as their low reactivity with the cathode materials on the one hand and promoting activity for the anodic reaction of nickel on the other [27], we believe that an electrolyte structure similar to SDC/YSZ/SDC can be effective to improve the fuel cell performance.
According to Liang et al. [31], thin-film electrolytes can be successfully fabricated by spin coating, dip coating, atomic layer deposition, and magnetron sputtering. Several publications [32,33] focus on the fabrication of GDC thin films by the magnetron sputtering method. There is, however, no information in the literature about magnetron sputtering of SDC thin films. Only Yoo [34] has fabricated Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 thin films using the high-frequency magnetron sputtering method, at 0.10 to 0.15 µm/h deposition rate. Single SOFCs with an SDC electrolyte 1 or 2 µm thick displayed 0.85 V OCV at 700 °C, although there were no measurement results of current–voltage characteristics in his work. SOFCs with the bilayer ScSZ/SDC (with layer thicknesses of 1.2/1.5 µm) electrolyte demonstrated OCV and power density values of 1.02 V and 360 mW/cm2 at 600 °C, respectively.
SOFCs with 1 µm thick SDC electrolyte, prepared in [35] by modified sol–gel route, were characterized by 0.83 OCV at 500 °C and maximum power densities of 59.6, 121.9, and 133.8 mW/cm2 at 500, 600, and 700 °C, respectively. Yoo et al. [36] fabricated an SDC electrolyte 30 µm thick by using suspension plasma spray for tubular SOFCs with metal base. Those SOFCs had 0.88 OCV and 165 mW/cm2 power density at 0.6 V and 600 °C. Ding et al. [37] fabricated SDC films by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The conductivity of films was 0.015 S/cm at 600 °C, which was almost 3 times higher than sol–gel-prepared films [38]. It was also noted that the film formation temperature when using PLD (600–700 °C) was considerably lower than the formation temperature when using spray coating (1300 °C) [39], electrophoretic deposition (1400 °C) [40], screen-printing [41], and others. Thus, a significant advantage of PLD is a much lower process temperature, which allows for avoidance of the potential chemical reactions at the electrolyte–electrode interface at high operating temperatures of fuel cells.
The literature review shows the absence of works in the area of SDC deposition by reactive magnetron sputtering of Ce–Sm metal targets, even though this technique provides high deposition rates as compared to high-frequency magnetron sputtering of oxide targets and is more suitable for industrial applications.
The aim of this work is to investigate the structure and properties of the SDC thin-film electrolyte deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. The latter is also used to create the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte structure to improve the OCV and efficiency of the SOFC. The microstructure and phase composition of the SDC electrolyte are studied by also using synchrotron radiation. The cell performance is investigated by current–voltage (I–U) curves and using impedance spectroscopy. The performance of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes is compared and discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. SDC and YSZ Layer Deposition

SDC (Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ) and YSZ ((ZrO2)0.92:Y2O3)0.08) electrolytes were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering of Ce–Sm (80/20 at.%) and Zr–Y (85/15 at.%) metal targets produced by Advanced Ceramic Esoterica Store (Beijing, China) and Girmet (Moscow, Russia), respectively. NiO/YSZ anodes (Kceracell Co., Chungcheongnam-Do, Republic of Korea) of diameter 20 mm and 0.7 mm thick were used as substrates. Prior to the coating deposition, the substrates were cleaned ultrasonically in isopropyl alcohol and then two times in deionized water. Afterwards, substrates were placed on a holder with a resistive heater. The vacuum chamber was evacuated to a residual pressure of 6 × 10−5 Torr, and substrates were heated up to 300 °C, which was kept during the deposition process. After that, argon was fed into the chamber at a rate of 110 sccm, and substrates were cleaned with an ion source with closed electron drift at 1.5 kV and 25–30 mA for 10 min. Then, oxygen was fed into the chamber, and the resulting Ar–O2 atmosphere was used for the electrolyte deposition.
This deposition process is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. During the process, the substrate holder was turned to the respective magnetron such that the substrate and target were parallel to each other and situated at a distance of 75 mm from each other. The multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte was sputtered in one technological cycle without vacuum loss in the chamber.
The SDC electrolyte was deposited at a process pressure of 8 × 10−3 torr. The gas flow rates were 100 and 50 sccm for argon and oxygen, respectively. The discharge power was constant and amounted to 0.5 kW. The deposition rate was 1 µm/h. The oxygen flow rate for the YSZ layer deposition was reduced to 40 sccm. At the discharge power of 0.5 kW, the deposition rate was 0.5 µm/h.
Magnetron sputtering systems were supplied by the pulsed power supply APEL-M-12DU-symmetric (Applied Electronics, Tomsk, Russia), generating 50 kHz frequency asymmetric bipolar rectangular pulses.

2.2. Preparation of Single Fuel Cells

Screen-printing was used to create a two-layer cathode on half-cells comprising the anode with single- or multilayer electrolytes for electrochemical testing. The La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–Ce0.9Gd0.1O2 (LSCF–GDC, 50:50 wt.%) paste (CERA-FC Co., Geumsan, Korea) was used to create the cathode functional layer. Two layers of the LSCF–GDC paste were applied to the electrolyte surface. Each layer was dried at 100 °C for 5 min, and then they were sintered at 1050 °C for 2 h. Prior to electrochemical testing, the cathode contact layer made of the La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 (LSC) paste (CERA-FC Co., Geumsan, Republic of Korea) was printed on the LSCF–GDC cathode functional layer. The LSC cathode contact layer was sintered in situ during the fuel cell testing at 800 °C. The cathode area was 1 cm2.

2.3. Investigation of Single Fuel Cells

The anode-supported fuel cell electrical characterization was provided by a ProboStatTM system (NorECs, Oslo, Norway) in the temperature range of 500–700 °C for the fuel cell with the SDC electrolyte, and 500–800 °C for the fuel cell with the SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte. The fuel cell placed in the test station was heated up to 800 °C for 2.5 h, kept at this temperature for 1 h, and then the current–voltage and impedance characteristics were measured. Glass sealing was used to separate gas spaces. Working gases were dry hydrogen and air consumed at 18 and 300 mL/min flow rates, respectively, for the single-layer SDC electrolyte, and at 105 and 400 mL/min flow rates for the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte. Pt wires and Ag mesh were used for current collection from the anode and cathode. I–U characteristics and impedance spectra were measured by a P-150S potentiostat/galvanostat and a Z-500P impedancemeter (Elins, Moscow, Russia). The impedance was measured in the frequency range of 0.1–5 × 105 Hz, and AC signal of 5 mV in amplitude was obtained under open circuit conditions.
An Apreo 2S Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to study the electrolyte microstructure and thickness measurements.
The phase composition of electrolytes was investigated on a Shimadzu XRD-6000 Diffractometer (Kyoto, Japan) using Cu-Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The analysis of the phase composition, coherent scattering regions, and microstresses (∆d/d) was performed using PDF4+ databases and PowderCell 2.4.
In addition to the conventional X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, synchrotron radiation (SR) was used to study the phase composition of the SDC electrolyte. The XRD analysis was conducted for the SR beam of the VEPP-3 storage ring, in Siberian Synchrotron and Terahertz Radiation Centre of the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia. SDC electrolyte was heated from 30 to 1300 °C at a heating rate of 15 °C/min. The operating wavelength was 0.172 nm. The diffraction angle was recalculated to the angle at 0.1541 nm wavelength (Cu-Kα radiation) for comparing the obtained results with those measured by a commercial X-ray diffraction apparatus.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fuel Cell with the Single-Layer SDC Electrolyte

Figure 2 shows cross-sectional SEM images of the magnetron sputtered SDC electrolyte obtained on the anode support after deposition and subsequent annealing at 1000 °C in air. It is known that high-temperature annealing provides the growth in crystallinity of magnetron sputtered YSZ and GDC layers [42,43]. The 5 µm thick electrolyte has good adhesion to the substrate. One can see that after 1000 °C annealing, the coating microstructure does not change.
Figure 3 presents XRD patterns of SDC layers 5 µm thick after the deposition and annealing at 900, 1000, and 1100 °C in air. The results of the XRD analysis are given in Table 1. The as-deposited SDC layer has the cubic crystal structure of fluorite with the space group Fm-3m (225) (the PDF file number 75-0158) and (111) preferred crystallographic orientation. The (111) and (222) peaks shift toward lower 2θ angles as compared to reference values. This indicates the presence of compressive stresses in the film. After annealing, the peak positions shift toward large angles, which indicates reduced residual stresses. After 900 °C annealing, the peak (331) is observed. When the annealing temperature rises, the lattice parameter reduces, the size of coherent scattering region (CSR) increases, and microstresses (∆d/d) decrease.
In addition to the conventional XRD analysis, SR radiation was used to study the phase composition of the SDC layer during the process of heating it to 1300 °C. According to Figure 4a, the as-deposited layer shows (111) and (220) peaks within the angular range of 2θ = 27–54°. The peak (200), matching 2θ = 32.9°, is not detected. The peaks widen and shift towards the low-angle region that, along with the absence of the peak (200), indicates a disordered structure or compressive stresses. Weak reflections are detected for the NiO/YSZ substrate.
A series of synchrotron X-ray diffraction (SXRD) patterns of the SDC layer is presented in Figure 4b as the intensity projection on the diffraction angle–time plane. These patterns are obtained during heating to 1300 °C in air and subsequent cooling down to room temperature. One can see that, during the heating process, the SDC reflections stop shifting to the left at ~770 °C due to thermal expansion, and their position is almost constant until 1300 °C. At the same time, the peak width narrows and the intensity grows. This is due to defect annealing of the electrolyte structure formed in non-equilibrium conditions and the structure saturation with oxygen from air.
After heating and cooling to room temperature, the peak position matches stoichiometric material, i.e., Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9. As presented in Figure 4a, the peak width reduces by about two times and, concurrently, the peak intensity increases by two times; thus, the total intensity does not change.

3.2. Fuel Cell with Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolyte

The SEM image in Figure 5a shows the microstructure of the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte with the layer thicknesses of 3, 1, and 1 µm. This image is obtained after the cell testing in the mode, which combines signals of secondary and backscattered electrons in the ratio 50:50. This imaging mode allows detection of the phase contrast and details of the coating morphology in one image. As can be seen in Figure 5a, the electrolyte has a dense structure and good adhesion, both between electrolyte layers and to the anode. The YSZ blocking layer is dense, without defects such as pores, cracks, and delamination. The formation of this dense defect-free structure is the important condition for blocking the electrolyte electronic conductivity. The XRD pattern in Figure 5b shows the presence of SDC and YSZ phases with cubic crystal structure in the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte.

3.3. Single Fuel Cell Testing

OCV temperature dependences for SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes are presented in Figure 6. OCV of the SOFC with the single-layer electrolyte (5.5 µm thick) does not surpass 0.85 V at 500 °C and gradually lowers to 0.77 V as operating temperature increases up to 700 °C. For comparison, this figure shows OCV values of SOFCs with the single-layer SDC electrolyte having thicknesses of 0.5 µm [35], 10 µm [44], and 400 µm [45]. OCV depends not only on temperature, but also thickness of the SDC electrolyte, although OCV of anode-supported fuel cells with the electrolyte having 0.5 to 10 µm thickness does not strongly depend on the thickness. However, the use of electrolyte-supported fuel cells with electrolyte thickness spanning several hundred micrometers provides 0.9 to 0.94 OCV. An explanation for the dependence of OCV on the thickness of the SDC electrolyte may be the smaller number of defects in the thicker electrolyte which pass through the entire thickness of the electrolyte. This leads to a higher gas impermeability in thick electrolytes. It may also be that the partial oxygen pressure distribution inside the electrolyte depends on its thickness. Nevertheless, OCV of the SOFC with the magnetron sputtered SDC electrolyte indicates very low gas permeation through the electrolyte layer, which is in good agreement with cross-sectional SEM observation of the electrolyte.
The addition of the YSZ thin blocking layer to the electrolyte structure leads to a significant OCV growth. Testing of cells with the YSZ blocking layer 0.5, 1, and 1.5 µm thick shows that, over the whole temperature range (500–800 °C), OCV of fuel cells with the multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte exceeds 1 V. The highest OCV is observed for fuel cells with blocking layers 1 and 1.5 µm thick. In the range of 500–700 °C, OCV of these cells exceeds 1.1 V, i.e., close to theoretical. These data prove that the addition of the YSZ thin blocking layer in the SDC electrolyte effectively blocks the leakage current, which causes the OCV drop at high temperatures. The use of YSZ blocking layer less than 0.5 µm thick does not provide an effective blocking of the leakage current.
Table 2 presents the performance of fuel cells with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes with different thickness of the YSZ blocking layer. Figure 7 shows I–U and current–power (I–P) curves of fuel cells with single-layer SDC electrolyte and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes with the YSZ blocking layer 1 μm thick. The highest power density (651 mW/cm2) for the SOFC with the single-layer SDC electrolyte was obtained at 650 °C (Figure 7a). With the temperature decrease, the cell power density reduces due to the lower ionic conductivity of the electrolyte and higher activation losses on electrodes. The temperature growth up to 700 °C also causes the power reduction, which is probably associated with the higher electronic conductivity of the SDC electrolyte. This is also evidenced by a decrease in the OCV of this cell. The power density also strongly depends on the hydrogen flow rate; its maximum values are observed at a rate of 18 mL/min. When the latter is higher, the power density decreases due to the growth in the electronic conductivity of the electrolyte and the OCV reduction.
As expected, the addition of the YSZ blocking layer to the SDC electrolyte leads to the SOFC power growth (Figure 7b). In this case, the highest power density is observed at much higher (105 mL/min) hydrogen flow rate, which indicates a decrease in the electronic conductivity in the electrolyte. Compared to the single-layer SDC electrolyte, the most significant performance improvement is observed at temperatures higher than 650 °C. At 600 °C and lower, the SOFC performance with single- and multilayer electrolytes does not differ. Among SOFCs with the multilayer electrolyte, the best properties are obtained for the SOFC with the YSZ blocking layer 1 µm thick. Its power density is 1438 mW/cm2 at 700 °C, i.e., 2 times higher than for the SOFC with the single-layer SDC electrolyte. The highest (2263 mW/cm2) power density is detected at 800 °C.
The area-specific resistances (ASR) calculated by the I–U curve slope at 700, 600, and 500 °C are, respectively, 0.163, 0.252, and 0.814 mΩ·cm2 for the SOFC with the SDC electrolyte, and 0.172, 0.275, and 0.838 mΩ·cm2 for the SOFC with the SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte, i.e., ASR values are almost the same. This means that the addition of the YSZ blocking layer 1 µm thick to the SDC electrolyte does not lead to a significant growth in the SOFC ohmic resistance. The similar behavior is described in [27] for the fuel cell with the thick SDC electrolyte coated by 2 µm thick YSZ film. However, the thickness growth of the YSZ blocking layer up to 1.5 µm (see Table 2) leads to faster performance degradation of the SOFC with decreasing temperature. This is particularly observed at temperatures below 650 °C, when the contribution of the ohmic resistance of the YSZ layer becomes more notable.
The impedance analysis is conducted to determine the contribution of the YSZ layer to ohmic (Rohm) and polarization (Rpol) resistances. Figure 8 presents impedance spectra of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolytes. The values of Rohm are summarized in Table 3 for all fuel cells, as obtained from the impedance plots.
The SOFC ohmic resistance, as related to the resistance in the electrolyte, electrode, and their interface, is determined by the spectrum intercept with Re(Z) axis in the high-frequency region. Since SOFCs differ by the electrolyte composition only, Rohm variation is attributed to the change in the electrolyte resistance. As can be seen from Table 3, the lowest Rohm at low (<600 °C) temperatures belongs to the single-layer SDC electrolyte. At higher temperatures, the Rohm of the cell with SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte becomes slightly smaller than that of a cell with a single layer electrolyte. In the latter, the thickness growth of the YSZ layer increases the ohmic resistance at any operating temperature.
The polarization resistance is determined for the SOFC with the SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte as a difference between intercepts with Re(Z) axis at low and high frequencies (see Table 4). This resistance is associated with activation and concentration losses in the fuel cell. Activation losses arise during the charge transfer from electronic and ionic conductors; this is also termed as charge transfer losses. Activation losses are typical for cathodes. These are attributed to the slow ORR kinetics, which involves the breakage of high-strength bonds in oxygen molecules [46]. Concentration losses occur when reacting molecules are consumed at a faster rate or when products are not quickly removed from reaction sites.
According to Table 4, Rpol of both SOFCs grows with decreasing operating temperature, because the catalytic activity of electrodes is reduced. Rpol of the SOFC with the SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte is higher than with the single-layer electrolyte. This is because the electronic conductivity is absent and the fuel humidity in the SOFC with the multilayer electrolyte is low. For the latter, we hypothesize dependences of the impedance spectra on air and hydrogen flow rates at 600 and 750 °C and the OCV (see Figure 9). The air flow rate of 200 to 600 mL/min has no effect on the impedance spectra. As for the hydrogen flow rate, it significantly affects the SOFC polarization resistance. The impedance spectra are approximated by high- and low-frequency arcs. The high-frequency arc size does not depend on the hydrogen flow rate. In contrast, the low-frequency arc becomes larger when the hydrogen flow rate increases from 30 to 105 mL/min, in particular at 750 °C.
In Figure 9, one can see the increase in the total polarization resistance with increasing hydrogen flow rate, while the high-frequency intercept remains reasonably constant within the experimental error. This indicates that the ohmic resistance remains unchanged, as expected. It is known that the low-frequency arc observed at 0.1 to 1 Hz is attributed to the mass transfer resistance on the anode [47]. At low frequencies, the contribution from transport phenomena to the impedance dominates over contributions from other phenomena.
The total electrode polarization usually decreases as the hydrogen partial pressure grows [47,48,49]. In our case, the situation is reversed, which is explained by the use of dry hydrogen and the test station design, in which the anode gas chamber is not sealed and is, thus, directly connected with air outside the furnace. Therefore, at low rates of the dry hydrogen flow, the partial pressure of water in the chamber is rather high. When the flow rate of dry hydrogen grows, moisture in the chamber decreases, thereby causing the size growth of the low-frequency arc and, consequently, the electrode total polarization. The same dependence was observed by Leonide et al. [50] for the polarization resistance and partial pressure of water vapor (pH2O) in the fuel gas. The impedance spectra measured at different pH2O values were analyzed by the distribution of relaxation times approach. At higher pH2O, they observed intensified low-frequency (0.1 to 1 Hz) processes caused by diffusion losses on the anode substrate.

4. Conclusions

The possibility of using magnetron sputtering was demonstrated for a successful fabrication of the thin film SDC electrolyte for IT-SOFCs. Magnetron sputtering provided the formation of the defect-free electrolyte, presenting a cubic phase and having good adhesion to the substrate. The OCV of the fuel cell with the SDC electrolyte 5.5 μm thick was about 0.8 V in the temperature range of 500 to 650 °C, which was then decreased to 0.77 V at 700 °C. The highest SOFC performance was observed at 650 °C, when its OCV and power density were 0.805 V and 651 mW/cm2, respectively. The SDC ability to reduce and, thus, promote the low OCV made its application ineffective as a thin-film electrolyte. The YSZ blocking layer incorporated into the electrolyte structure improved OCV and power density of fuel cells. It was shown that the presence of the blocking layer did not lead to ohmic resistance growth, and its optimal thickness was about 1 µm. At 650 °C, the SOFC with the SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte demonstrated 1.1 V and 1132 mW/cm2, i.e., 1.5 times higher than the values manifested by the SOFC with the single-layer electrolyte. The highest performance was observed for the fuel cell with the multilayer electrolyte at 800 °C; its OCV and power density were, respectively, 1.06 V and 2263 mW/cm2.
Despite the promising findings presented in this paper, further research is needed to test the long-term stability of multilayer electrolytes and their resistance to redox tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. (Andrey Solovyev); investigation, E.S. and A.S. (Anna Shipilova); writing—original draft preparation, A.S. (Anna Shipilova); writing—review and editing, A.S. (Andrey Solovyev). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project No. 075-15-2021-1348, event No. 2.1.2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Nanotekh Regional Core Facility Centre of the Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science SB RAS (Tomsk, Russia) for SEM investigations and Tomsk Materials Science Core Facility Centre TSU (Tomsk, Russia) for conducting the XRD analysis. The authors wish to thank Burmistrov I. N., a senior scientist from the Institute of Solid State Physics RAS (Moscow District, Russia), for his help in analyzing impedance spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tu, H.Y.; Takeda, Y.; Imanishi, N.; Yamamoto, O. Ln0.4Sr0.6Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd) for the electrode in solid oxide fuel cells. Solid. State Ion. 1999, 117, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wright, J.; Virkar, A.V. Conductivity of porous Sm2O3-doped CeO2 as a function of temperature and oxygen partial pressure. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wachsman, E.D.; Lee, K.T. Lowering the temperature of solid oxide fuel cells. Science 2011, 334, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Januschewsky, J.; Ahrens, M.; Opitz, A.; Kubel, F.; Fleig, J. Optimized La0.6Sr0.4CoO3−δ thin-film electrodes with extremely fast oxygen-reduction kinetics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3151–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Leng, Y.; Chan, S.H.; Liu, Q. Development of LSCF–GDC composite cathodes for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells with thin film GDC electrolyte. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 3808–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Cai, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Long, W. Improved thermal expansion and electrochemical performance of La0.4Sr0.6Co0.9Sb0.1O3−δ-Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 composite cathode for IT-SOFCs. Solid. State Sci. 2019, 91, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pikalova, E.; Bogdanovich, N.; Ermakova, L.; Kolchugin, A.; Khrustov, A.; Farlenkov, A. Methods to increase electrochemical activity of lanthanum nickelate-ferrite electrodes for intermediate and low temperature SOFCs. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 35923–35937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hong, S.; Lee, D.; Lim, Y.; Bae, J.; Kim, Y.B. Yttria-stabilized zirconia thin films with restrained columnar grains for oxygen ion conducting electrolytes. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 16703–16709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.; Worrell, W.L.; Park, S.; Vohs, J.M.; Gorte, R.J. Fabrication and performance of thin-film YSZ solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A864–A868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Solovyev, A.A.; Lebedynskiy, A.M.; Shipilova, A.V.; Ionov, I.V.; Smolyanskiy, E.A.; Lauk, A.L.; Maslov, A.S. Scale-up of solid oxide fuel cells with magnetron sputtered electrolyte. Fuel Cells 2017, 17, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andersson, D.A.; Simak, S.I.; Skorodumova, N.V.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Johansson, B. Optimisation of ionic conductivity in doped ceria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3518–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Steele, B.C.H. Appraisal of Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2 electrolytes for IT-SOFC operation at 500 °C. Solid. State Ion. 2000, 129, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Steele, B.C.H.; Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel cell technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pikalova, E.Y.; Kalinina, E.G. Solid oxide fuel cells based on ceramic membranes with mixed conductivity: Improving efficiency. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 703–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venkataramana, K.; Madhuri, C.; Reddy, C.V. Triple-doped ceria–carbonate (Ce0.82La0.06Sm0.06Gd0.06O2−δ-(Li–Na)2CO3) nanocomposite solid electrolyte materials for LT–SOFC applications. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 27584–27594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Madhuri, C.; Venkataramana, K.; Shanker, J.; Reddy, C.V. Effect of La3+, Pr3+, and Sm3+ triple-doping on structural, electrical, and thermal properties of ceria solid electrolytes for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 849, 1566361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiaomin, L.I.N.; Qiuyue, L.; Lili, Z.H.U.; Xiaomei, L.I.U. Synthesis and characterization of Ce0.8Sm0.2−xPrxO2−δ (x  =  0.02–0.08) solid electrolyte materials. J. Rare Earths 2015, 33, 411–416. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu, Y.-C.; Chien, C.-H.; Xu, G. Conductivity and microstructure analysis of ceria materials doped with multiple elements. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, s747–s757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tanwar, K.; Jaiswal, N.; Kumar, D.; Parkash, O. Synthesis & characterization of Dy and Ca Co-doped ceria based solid electrolytes for IT-SOFCs. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 684, 683–690. [Google Scholar]
  20. Babu, A.S.; Bauri, R.; Reddy, G.S. Processing and conduction behavior of nano-crystalline Gd-doped and rare earth co-doped ceria electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mishima, Y.; Mitsuyasu, H.; Ohtaki, M.; Eguchi, K. Solid oxide fuel cell with composite electrolyte consisting of samaria doped ceria and yttria-stabilized zirconia. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raghvendra, P.; Singh, P. Electrical conductivity of YSZ-SDC composite solid electrolyte synthesized via glycine-nitrate method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11692–11698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mukai, T.; Tsukui, S.; Yoshida, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Hatayama, R.; Adachi, M.; Ishibashi, H.; Kakehi, Y.; Satoh, K.; Kusaka, T.; et al. Fabrication of Y2O3-doped zirconia/gadolinia-doped ceria bilayer electrolyte thin film SOFC cells of SOFCs by single-pulsed laser deposition processing. J. Fuel. Cell. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 0610061–0610066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Park, T.; Lee, Y.H.; Cho, G.Y.; Ji, S.; Park, J.; Chang, I.; Cha, S.W. Effect of the thickness of sputtered gadolinia-doped ceria as a cathodic interlayer in solid oxide fuel cells. Thin. Solid. Film. 2015, 584, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fan, Z.; An, J.; Iancu, A.; Prinz, F.B. Thickness effects of yttria-doped ceria interlayers on solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2012, 218, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Solovyev, A.A.; Rabotkin, S.V.; Kuterbekov, K.A.; Koketay, T.A.; Nurkenov, S.A.; Opakhai, S.; Shipilova, A.V.; Ionov, I.V.; Eliseeva, G.M. Comparison of sputter-deposited single and multilayer electrolytes based on gadolinia-doped ceria and yttria-stabilized zirconia for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eguchi, K.; Setoguchi, T.; Inoue, T.; Arai, H. Electrical properties of ceria-based oxides and their application to solid oxide fuel cells. Solid. State Ion. 1992, 52, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Inaba, H.; Tagawa, H. Ceria-based solid electrolytes. Solid. State Ion. 1996, 83, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suzuki, T.; Hasan, Z.; Funahashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Fujishiro, Y.; Awano, M. Fabrication and characterization of microtubular SOFCs with multilayered electrolyte. Electrochem. Solid. State Lett. 2008, 11, B87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noh, H.S.; Hong, J.; Kim, H.; Yoon, K.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, B.K.; Son, J.W. Sandwiched ultra-thin yttria-stabilized zirconia layer to effectively and reliably block reduction of thin-film gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 123, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liang, F.; Yang, J.R.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, Z.; He, J.C.; Yuan, Q.; Wu, J.; Liu, P.; Zhong, Z.; et al. A review of thin film electrolytes fabricated by physical vapor deposition for solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 36926–36952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coppola, N.; Polverino, P.; Carapella, G.; Sacco, C.; Galdi, A.; Ubaldini, A.; Vaiano, V.; Montinaro, D.; Maritato, L.; Pianese, C. Structural and electrical characterization of sputter-deposited Gd0.1Ce0.9O2−δ thin buffer layers at the Y-stabilized zirconia electrolyte interface for IT-solid oxide cells. Catalysts 2018, 8, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jordan, N.; Assenmacher, W.; Uhlenbruck, S.; Haanappel, V.A.C.; Buchkremer, H.P.; Stöver, D.; Mader, W. Ce0.8Gd0.2O2−δ protecting layers manufactured by physical vapor deposition for IT-SOFC. Solid. State Ion. 2008, 179, 919–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yoo, Y. Fabrication and characterization of thin film electrolytes deposited by RF magnetron sputtering for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2006, 160, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, H.; Ding, C.; Sato, K.; Tsutai, Y.; Hashida, T. Low-temperature anode-supported SOFC with ultra-thin ceria-based electrolytes prepared by modified sol-gel route. J. Solid. Mech. Mater. Eng. 2010, 4, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Yoo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Deng, X.; Singh, D.; Legoux, J.-G. Metal supported tubular solid oxide fuel cells fabricated by suspension plasma spray and suspension high velocity oxy-fuel spray. J. Power Sources 2012, 215, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ding, X.F.; Shen, J.Y.; Gao, X.J.; Wang, J. Enhanced electrochemical properties of Sm0.2Ce0.8O1.9 film for SOFC electrolyte fabricated by pulsed laser deposition. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 1294–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, W.; Shuk, P.; Greenblatt, M. Properties of sol-gel prepared Ce1−xSmxO2−x/2 solid electrolytes. Solid. State Ion. 1997, 100, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matsuda, M.; Hosomia, T.; Murata, K.; Fukui, T.; Miyake, M. Fabrication of bilayered YSZ/SDC electrolyte film by electrophoretic deposition for reduced-temperature operating anode-supported SOFC. J. Power Sources 2007, 165, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, C.S.; Lin, H.F.; Sato, K.; Tsutai, Y.; Ohtaki, H. Preparation of doped ceria electrolyte films for SOFCs by spray coating method. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2009, 30, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, L.J.; Huang, X.Q.; Zhu, R.B.; Lu, Z.; Sun, W.W. Optimization on technical parameters for fabrication of SDC film by screen-printing used as electrolyte in IT-SOFC. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2008, 69, 2019–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sochugov, N.S.; Soloviev, A.A.; Shipilova, A.V.; Rabotkin, S.V.; Rotshtein, V.P.; Sigfusson, I.T. The effect of pulsed electron beam pretreatment of magnetron sputtered ZrO2:Y2O3 films on the performance of IT-SOFC. Solid. State Ion. 2013, 231, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bouleau, L.; Coton, N.; Coquoz, P.; Ihringer, R.; Billard, A.; Briois, P. GDC buffer layer synthesized by reactive magnetron sputtering: Effect of total pressure and thickness on SOFC performances. Crystals 2020, 10, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, X.; Robertson, M.; Deĉes-Petit, C.; Qu, W.; Kesler, O.; Maric, R.; Ghosh, D. Internal shorting and fuel loss of a low temperature solid oxide fuel cell with SDC electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2007, 164, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xia, C.; Rauch, W.L.; Chen, F.; Liu, M. Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3 cathodes for low-temperature SOFCs. Solid. State Ion. 2002, 149, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Mahato, N.; Banerjee, A.; Gupta, A.; Omar, S.; Balani, K. Progress in material selection for solid oxide fuel cell technology: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 72, 141–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. DiGiuseppe, G.; Sun, L. On the identification of impedance spectroscopy processes of an SOFC under different hydrogen concentrations. J. Fuel Cell. Sci. Technol. 2012, 9, 051004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nakajima, H.; Kitahara, T.; Konomi, T. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis of an anode-supported microtubular solid oxide fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, B1686–B1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shi, Y.; Cai, N.; Li, C.; Bao, C.; Croiset, E.; Qian, J.; Hu, Q.; Wang, S. Simulation of electrochemical impedance spectra of solid oxide fuel cells using transient physical models. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, B270–B280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Leonide, A.; Apel, Y.; Ivers-Tiffée, E. SOFC Modeling and parameter identification by means of impedance spectroscopy. ECS Trans. 2009, 19, 81–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 13 00585 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of SDC and YSZ layer deposition by magnetron sputtering.
Figure 1. Schematic of SDC and YSZ layer deposition by magnetron sputtering.
Membranes 13 00585 g001
Membranes 13 00585 g002 550
Figure 2. Cross-sectional SEM images of magnetron sputtered single-layer SDC electrolyte on the anode support: (a)—as-deposited, (b)—after 1000 °C annealing.
Figure 2. Cross-sectional SEM images of magnetron sputtered single-layer SDC electrolyte on the anode support: (a)—as-deposited, (b)—after 1000 °C annealing.
Membranes 13 00585 g002
Membranes 13 00585 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of single-layer SDC electrolyte annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of single-layer SDC electrolyte annealed at different temperatures.
Membranes 13 00585 g003
Membranes 13 00585 g004 550
Figure 4. XRD patterns of SDC electrolyte on NiO/YSZ substrate: (a)—before and after 1300 °C annealing, (b)—during heating to 1300 °C and cooling to room temperature.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of SDC electrolyte on NiO/YSZ substrate: (a)—before and after 1300 °C annealing, (b)—during heating to 1300 °C and cooling to room temperature.
Membranes 13 00585 g004
Membranes 13 00585 g005 550
Figure 5. Cross-sectional SEM image (a) and XRD pattern (b) of multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional SEM image (a) and XRD pattern (b) of multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte.
Membranes 13 00585 g005
Membranes 13 00585 g006 550
Figure 6. Temperature dependences of OCV of SOFCs with single-layer SDC electrolyte, reproduced from [35,44,45], and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte with different thickness of YSZ layer.
Figure 6. Temperature dependences of OCV of SOFCs with single-layer SDC electrolyte, reproduced from [35,44,45], and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolyte with different thickness of YSZ layer.
Membranes 13 00585 g006
Membranes 13 00585 g007 550
Figure 7. I–U and I–P curves of SOFCs with single-layer SDC (a) and multilayer SDC/YSZ(1 μm)/SDC (b) electrolytes.
Figure 7. I–U and I–P curves of SOFCs with single-layer SDC (a) and multilayer SDC/YSZ(1 μm)/SDC (b) electrolytes.
Membranes 13 00585 g007
Membranes 13 00585 g008 550
Figure 8. Impedance plots of SOFCs with single-layer SDC (a) and multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC (b) electrolytes. Inserts show the high-frequency region.
Figure 8. Impedance plots of SOFCs with single-layer SDC (a) and multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC (b) electrolytes. Inserts show the high-frequency region.
Membranes 13 00585 g008
Membranes 13 00585 g009 550
Figure 9. Impedance plots of SOFC with multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte measured at 600 °C (a) and 750 °C (b) at OCV and different hydrogen flow rates.
Figure 9. Impedance plots of SOFC with multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolyte measured at 600 °C (a) and 750 °C (b) at OCV and different hydrogen flow rates.
Membranes 13 00585 g009
Table
Table 1. Phase composition and structural parameters of SDC electrolyte.
Table 1. Phase composition and structural parameters of SDC electrolyte.
SDC FilmsPhasesPhase Content, vol.%Lattice Parameters, ǺCSR 1 Size, nm∆d/d × 10–3
As-deposited(Ce0.8Sm0.2)O1.9100a = 5.4495391.1
Annealed at 900 °C(Ce0.8Sm0.2)O1.9100a = 5.43751290.3
Annealed at 1000 °C(Ce0.8Sm0.2)O1.9100a = 5.43091890.2
Annealed at 1100 °C(Ce0.8Sm0.2)O1.9100a = 5.4348920.3
1 CSR size and ∆d/d are calculated for peaks (111) and (222), respectively.
Table
Table 2. Maximum power density of fuel cells with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Table 2. Maximum power density of fuel cells with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Electrolyte StructuresPower Density (mW/cm–2)
800 °C750 °C700 °C650 °C600 °C550 °C500 °C
SDC (5.5 μm)--558651604405208
SDC/YSZ (0.5 μm)/SDC1650152313571080782469213
SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC2263181814381132794445201
SDC/YSZ (1.5 μm)/SDC191214501190935611340143
Table
Table 3. Ohmic resistance of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Table 3. Ohmic resistance of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Electrolyte StructureOhmic Resistance (Ω·cm2)
800 °C750 °C700 °C650 °C600 °C550 °C500 °C
SDC (5.5 μm)--0.040.050.080.120.22
SDC/YSZ (0.5 μm)/SDC0.0160.0170.030.040.070.120.23
SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC0.0170.020.030.040.070.140.29
SDC/YSZ (1.5 μm)/SDC0.0180.020.030.050.10.190.39
Table
Table 4. Polarization resistance of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Table 4. Polarization resistance of SOFCs with single-layer SDC and multilayer SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC electrolytes at different temperatures.
Electrolyte StructurePolarization Resistance (Ω·cm2)
800 °C750 °C700 °C650 °C600 °C550 °C500 °C
SDC (5.5 μm)--0.080.10.230.611.6
SDC/YSZ (1 μm)/SDC0.260.330.410.581.012.87.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solovyev, A.; Shipilova, A.; Smolyanskiy, E. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Magnetron Sputtered Single-Layer SDC and Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolytes. Membranes 2023, 13, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13060585

AMA Style

Solovyev A, Shipilova A, Smolyanskiy E. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Magnetron Sputtered Single-Layer SDC and Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolytes. Membranes. 2023; 13(6):585. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13060585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solovyev, Andrey, Anna Shipilova, and Egor Smolyanskiy. 2023. "Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Magnetron Sputtered Single-Layer SDC and Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolytes" Membranes 13, no. 6: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13060585

APA Style

Solovyev, A., Shipilova, A., & Smolyanskiy, E. (2023). Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Magnetron Sputtered Single-Layer SDC and Multilayer SDC/YSZ/SDC Electrolytes. Membranes, 13(6), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13060585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop