Next Article in Journal
USV Collision Avoidance Decision-Making Based on the Improved PPO Algorithm in Restricted Waters
Previous Article in Journal
An Analytical Study on the Performance and Feasibility of Converting a Combined Gas or Gas Propulsion System to a Combined Gas Turbine–Electric and Steam System for a Type 22 Frigate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Complete Mitogenomes of Deep-Sea Eels Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica and a New Record of H. bathybius from the East Mariana Basin, Western Pacific Ocean

1
Marine Biotechnology & Bioresource Research Department, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (KIOST), Busan 49111, Republic of Korea
2
Climate Change and Environmental Biology Research Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(8), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081427
Submission received: 19 June 2024 / Revised: 25 July 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 18 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abundance and Diversity of the Sea Fish Community)

Abstract

:
In this study, using Illumina sequencing, we sequenced first the complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of two deep-sea eels, Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica, collected from the East Mariana Basin in the Western Pacific Ocean. The complete length of the H. bathybius and S. parasitica mitogenomes were 16,696 and 16,687 bp, respectively, each containing 37 genes (13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, and 2 ribosomal RNA genes). To enhance the accuracy of the identification of H. bathybius and S. parasitica, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of multiple deep-sea eels based on the mitochondrial DNA gene (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI]) using the maximum likelihood method. Our phylogenetic tree analysis confirmed that the specimens collected in this study are congeneric species of H. bathybius and S. parasitica reported in previous studies. Based on these results, we report the first complete mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica and a new record for the two species in the East Mariana Basin.

1. Introduction

Deep-sea species occupy a relatively large portion of global ecosystems, but their diversity and distribution are not well studied owing to the challenges imposed by the harsh conditions of deep-sea environments (>200 m depth) [1,2]. Fortunately, despite the extreme challenges involved in sampling methods [3,4,5], several studies have been conducted in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans to characterize and document deep-sea organism habitats and diversity over the past decade. Notably, a few new species have been identified and shown to have extensive spatial distributions [6,7,8,9].
As with all species, the correct identification of known and/or new species of fish is important for biodiversity assessments in deep-sea ecosystems [10]. Morphological analysis, which is a widely used basic tool for characterizing and identifying species [11], may not be adequate in every case, especially considering the morphological diversity of fish and changes during ontogeny [12,13,14]. DNA barcoding has emerged as a useful taxonomic tool for the rapid and reliable identification of unknown specimens through phylogeny reconstruction [15,16,17]. In addition, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be used as a DNA-based marker in population genetic diversity and conservation studies [18]. In particular, the mtDNA marker gene (mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI]) has been extensively used to identify marine species [19,20,21,22]. Notably, mtDNA genes have recently been used to identify deep-sea fish, including eel species (e.g., Bassozetus sp., Synaphobranchus affinis, and Synaphobranchus brevidorsalis) [23,24,25,26]. Therefore, mtDNA genes can be used as genetic markers for the accurate species identification of deep-sea eels. However, little information is available on the complete mitogenome of deep-sea eels in the Western Pacific Ocean.
In this study, the complete mitogenomes of Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica collected from the East Mariana Basin are documented for the first time. Further, to confirm the identification, we conducted a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the COI gene sequences of a number of deep-sea eel species. Overall, this study provides molecular information for further evolutionary ecology research associated with the population distribution of deep-sea eels in the Western Pacific Ocean.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection, Genomic DNA Extraction, and Sequencing

Recognizing the existing knowledge gap in biodiversity in the western Pacific region, the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) has initiated a program to acquire marine bioresources from this region. During an oceanographic cruise onboard the RV ISABU (Supplementary Figure S1A) of the KIOST to the Western Pacific Ocean in May 2021 (Supplementary Figure S1B and Supplementary Table S1), H. bathybius and S. parasitica were collected in a fishing bait trap (Supplementary Figure S2), each from a different depth. Supplementary Figure S3 presents the images of H. bathybius and S. parasitica.
All animal experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the Guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Experimental Committee and approved by the KIOST.
The fish tissue samples were preserved at −20 °C until DNA isolation. Genomic DNA was extracted from the muscle using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of the isolated DNA were analyzed and measured at 230, 260, and 280 nm using a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform at the National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The complete mitogenomes of the two deep-sea eel specimens were assembled and annotated using MitoZ [27]. The circular maps of the mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica were drawn by the GeSeq tool (https://chlorobox.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/geseq.html (accessed on 10 June 2024) [28].

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

To construct a molecular phylogenetic tree, a total of 24 mtDNA COI sequences from the eel family Synaphobranchidae (genus: Simenchelys, llyophis, Histiobranchus, Dysomma, Dysommina, Diastobrachus, and Synaphobranchus) were downloaded from the GenBank (Supplementary Table S2). The nucleotide sequences of the individual mtDNA COI genes were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm in the MEGA software (ver. 11.0.1; Centre for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, AZ, USA). To establish the best-fit substitution model for phylogenetic analysis, the model with the lowest Bayesian information criterion and Akaike information criterion scores was estimated using a maximum likelihood analysis. According to the model test results, maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses were performed with the LG + G + I model using the MEGA software. Support for nodes was calculated using 1000 bootstrap replicates.

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, the complete mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica were sequenced and deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: PP726018 and PP726019, respectively). The sequence lengths of the complete mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica were 16,696 base pairs (bp) and 16,687 bp, respectively. The complete mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica each encoded a set of 37 genes (13 protein-coding genes [PCGs], 22 tRNA genes, and two rRNA genes) (Table 1 and Table 2 as well as Figure 1). The complete mitogenome of H. bathybius had a nucleotide composition of A (31.9%), C (26.5%), G (16.5%), and T (25.1%). The overall base composition of S. parasitica was A (31.2%), C (25.9%), G (17.0%), and T (26.0%). Notably, the differences among species may be related to the mitogenome base composition. For example, the A + T and G + C contents of 13 PCGs in the complete mitogenome of H. bathybius were 56.8% and 43.2%, respectively, whereas the contents of all sequences in the complete mitogenome were 57.0% and 43.0%, respectively. In the case of S. parasitica, the A + T and G + C contents of 13 PCGs in the complete mitogenome were 56.9% and 43.1%, respectively, whereas those in all sequences were 42.9% and 57.1%, respectively. Additionally, in H. bathybius, most of the PCGs (12 of 13 genes) were initiated with the start codon ATG, whereas COX1 had the start codon GTG. Eleven PCGs terminated with TAA/TAG, whereas COX2 and ND4 exhibited an incomplete termination codon T. In S. parasitica, most of the PCGs (12 of 13 genes) were initiated with the start codon ATG, whereas COX1 had the start codon GTG. Eleven PCGs terminated with TAA/TAG, whereas COX2 and ND4 exhibited an incomplete termination codon T. In addition, a previous study determined the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of S. parasitica (accession number: AP010849) [16]. The complete mitochondrial genome of S. parasitica contained 13 PCGs, 22 transfer RNAs, two rRNA genes, and a control region (D loop). The overall base composition of the mitogenome was A 31.8%, C 25.4%, G 16.5%, and T 21 26.3%, which is similar but slightly different from that of S. parasitica used in this study, showing compositional differences. Therefore, we suggest that H. bathybius and S. parasitica exhibit species- and region-specific differences in the complete mitogenomes of deep-sea eels.
A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the mtDNA COI gene (Figure 2). H. bathybius and S. parasitica from the Western Pacific Ocean showed distinctive genetic differences based on their mtDNA COI sequences. In particular, a molecular phylogenetic tree analysis of the mtDNA COI gene revealed that the collected specimens, presumed to be H. bathybius and S. parasitica, were congeneric with H. bathybius (bootstrap value of 100%) and S. parasitica (bootstrap value of 98%). Collectively, our results, including phylogenetic analyses based on mtDNA COI, confirm that the two deep-sea eel species collected in the East Mariana Basin were H. bathybius and S. parasitica. In a previous study, the identification of deep-sea eels (e.g., Bassozetus sp., Synaphobranchus affinis, and S. brevidorsalis) in the East Mariana Basin was described based on DNA barcoding [25,26]. Therefore, our findings suggest that mtDNA-based markers are useful for the rapid and accurate species identification of eels collected from the East Mariana Basin.
Histiobranchus [29] belongs to the family Synaphobranchidae and currently includes four valid species: H. australis [30], H. infernalis [29], H. bathybius [31], and H. bruuni [32]. To date, H. bathybius has only been reported in the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans [27]. Prior to the present study, there were no records of H. bathybius from the Western Pacific Ocean or any documentation of its complete mitogenome.
The snubnosed eel Simenchelys parasitica [33], belonging to the family Synaphobranchidae and the subfamily Simenchelyinae, is a species of the small deep-sea eels, which are classified under a single genus [33]. To date, S. parasiticus has been recorded in the Atlantic Ocean [33,34,35,36,37], southern Africa [38], the Western Pacific Ocean [39,40,41], and the central North Pacific Ocean [42]. Collectively, our results suggest that H. bathybius and S. parasitica could inhabit and cover a vast range throughout the Western Pacific Ocean. In addition, the complete mitogenomes of H. bathybius and S. parasitica will be important for further study on the genetic conservation, evolutionary diversity, and distribution of species abundance of deep-sea fishes in the Western Pacific Ocean. However, morphological analyses of H. bathybius and S. parasitica are required to confirm the accuracy of species identification.
In summary, we determined, for the first time, the complete mitogenome sequences of H. bathybius and S. parasitica collected from the East Mariana Basin in the Western Pacific Ocean. In addition, the mtDNA COI gene was sufficient to distinguish between H. bathybius and S. parasitica, showing the utility of mtDNA-based phylogeny for quickly identifying deep-sea eels.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jmse12081427/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft, J.H.; investigation, H.-J.K., B.-J.K., J.-Y.H. and C.H.N.; project administration, funding acquisition, Y.-U.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the High Seas Bioresources Program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science &Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (KIMST-20210646).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experiments were conducted in compliance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Experimental Committee of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), which approved the experimental protocol.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available via the data repository of the KIOST. Requests for material should be made to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the High Seas Bioresources Program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science &Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (KIMST-20210646). Finally, we thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ramirez-Llodra, E.; Brandt, A.; Danovaro, R.; Mol, B.D.; Escobar, E.; German, C.R.; Levin, L.A.; Arbizu, P.M.; Menot, L.; Buhl-Mortensen, P.; et al. Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem. Biogeosciences 2010, 7, 2851–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rex, M.A. Community structure in the deep-sea Benthos. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1981, 12, 331–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elphick, C.S. How you count counts: The importance of methods research in applied ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Farnsworth, E.J.; Chu, M.; Kress, W.J.; Neill, A.K.; Best, J.H.; Pickering, J.; Stevenson, R.D.; Courtney, G.W.; VanDyk, J.K.; Ellison, A.M. Next-Generation Field Guides. Bioscience 2013, 63, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Austen, G.E.; Bindemann, M.; Griffiths, R.A.; Roberts, D.L. Species identification by experts and non-experts: Comparing images from field guides. Sci. Rep. 2016, 20, 33634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Danovaro, R.; Company, J.B.; Corinaldesi, C.D.; Onghia, G.; Galil, B.; Gambi, C.; Gooday, A.J.; Lampadariou, N.; Luna, G.M.; Morigi, C.; et al. Deep-sea biodiversity in the mediterranean sea: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Costello, M.J.; Chaudhary, C. Marine biodiversity, biogeography, deep-sea gradients, and conservation. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R511–R527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blake, J.A.; Maciolek, N.J. New species and records of Heterospio (Annelida, Longosomatidae) from continental shelf, slope and abyssal depths of the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean and adjacent seas. Zootaxa 2023, 5260, 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Glover, A.G.; Higgs, N.D.; Horton, T. World Register of Deep-Sea Species (WoRDSS). 2023. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/deepsea (accessed on 12 November 2021).
  10. Wiens, J.; Parra-Olea, G.; García-París, M.; Wake, D. Phylogenetic history explains elevational biodiversity patterns in tropical salamanders. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Strauss, R.E.; Bond, C.E. Taxonomic methods: Morphology. In Methods for Fish Biology; Schreck, C.B., Moyle, P.B., Eds.; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1990; pp. 109–140. [Google Scholar]
  12. Matarese, A.C.; Spies, I.B.; Busby, M.S.; Orr, J.W. Early larvae of Zesticelus profundorum (family Cottidae) identified using DNA barcoding. Ichthyol. Res. 2011, 58, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Triantafyllidis, A.; Bobori, D.; Koliamitra, C.; Gbandi, E.; Mpanti, M.; Petriki, O.; Karaiskou, N. DNA barcoding analysis of fish species diversity in four north Greek lakes. Mitochondrial DNA 2011, 22, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, J.B.; Hanner, R. DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2011, 39, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; de Waard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Inoue, J.G.; Miya, M.; Miller, M.J.; Sado, T.; Hanel, R.; Hatooka, K.; Aoyama, J.; Minegishi, Y.; Nishida, M.; Tsukamoto, K. Deep-ocean origin of the freshwater eels. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miya, M.; Takeshima, H.; Endo, H.; Ishiguro, N.B.; Inoue, J.G.; Mukai, T.; Satoh, T.P.; Yamaguchi, M.; Kawaguchi, A.; Mabuchi, K.; et al. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: A new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2003, 26, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Timm, J.; Figiel, M.; Kochzius, M. Contrasting patterns in species boundaries and evolution of anemone fishes (Amphiprioninae, Pomacentridae) in the centre of marine biodiversity. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2008, 49, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santos, S.; Schneider, H.; Sampaio, I. Genetic differentiation of Macrodon ancylodon (Sciaenidae, Perciformes) populations in Atlantic coastal waters of South America as revealed by mtDNA analysis. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2003, 26, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vinson, C.; Grazielle, G.; Schneider, H.; Sampaio, I. Sciaenidae fish of the Caeté river estuary, Northern Brazil: Mitochondrial DNA suggests explosive radiation for the Western Atlantic assemblage. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 27, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. An, H.-S.; Jee, Y.-J.; Min, K.-S.; Kim, B.-L.; Han, S.-J. Phylogenetic analysis of six pacific abalone (Haiotidae) based on DNA sequences of 16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I mitochondrial genes. Mar. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Teramura, A.; Koeda, K.; Senou, H.; Ho, H.C.; Kikuchi, K.; Hirase, S. DNA barcoding of deep-sea fishes from the northwestern Pacific Ocean: A resource for identifying hidden genetic diversity in deep-sea fishes. Authorea 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, H.-J.; Han, J.; Kim, B.-J.; Lee, K.-W.; Hyeong, K.; Choi, Y.-U. New records of two deep-sea eels collected from the Western Pacific Ocean based on COI and 16S rRNA genes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 5795–5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Han, J.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, B.-J.; Hyeong, K.; Noh, C.; Choi, Y.-U. New record of the Grey Cutthroat, Synaphobranchus affinis (Anguilliformes: Synaphobranchidae) from the East Mariana Basin, Western Pacific Ocean. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, J.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, K.-W.; Choi, Y.-U. Complete mitochondrial DNA genomes of deep-sea eels Synaphobranchus brevidorsalis and S. affinis and new record of S. brevidorsalis from the East Mariana Basin. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meng, G.; Li, Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, S. MitoZ: A toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tillich, M.; Lehwark, P.; Pellizzer, T.; Ulbricht-Jones, E.S.; Fischer, A.; Bock, R.; Greiner, S. GeSeq—Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W6–W11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gill, T.N. Diagnosis of new genera and species of deep-sea fish-like vertebrates. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1883, 6, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Regan, C.T. The antarctic fishes of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1913, 49, 229–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Günther, A. Preliminary notes on new fishes collected in Japan during the expedition of H.M.S. Challenger. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1877, 20, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Castle, P.H.J. Deep-sea eels. Family Synaphobranchidae. Galathea Rep. 1964, 7, 24–42. [Google Scholar]
  33. Goode, G.B.; Bean, T.H. A catalogue of the fishes of Essex County, Massachusetts, including the fauna of Massachusetts Bay and the contiguous deep waters. Bull. Essex Inst. 1879, 11, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  34. Goode, G.B.; Bean, T.H. Oceanic ichthyology. Smithson. Contrib. Knowl. 1896, 981, 1–553. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zugrayer, E. Poissons provenant des cam-pagnes du yacht “Princesse-Alice”. Result. Camp. Sci. Prince Albert I 1910, 35, 1. [Google Scholar]
  36. Roule, L. Poissons provenant des cam-pagnes du yacht “Princesse-Alice” (1891–1903) et du yacht “Hirondelle II” (1914). Result. Camp. Sci. Prince Albert I 1919, 52, 1. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fowler, H.W. The marine fishes of West Africa. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1936, 70, 1–605. [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, J.L.B. The Sea Fishes of Southern Africa; Central News Agency, Ltd.: Johannesburg, South Africa, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tanaka, S. Notes on some Japanese Fishes, with Descriptions of Fourteen New Species; Imperial University: Tokyo, Japan, 1908; Volume 23, pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jordan, D.S.; Thomson, W.F. Record of the fishes obtained in Japan in 1911. Mem. Carneg. Mus. 1914, 6, 205–231. [Google Scholar]
  41. Castle, P.H.J. Deep-Water Eels from Cook Strait, New Zealand; Zoology Publications from Victoria University of Wellington: Wellington, New Zealand, 1961; Volume 27, pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  42. Solomon-Raju, N.; Rosenblatt, R.H. New record of the parasitic eel, Simenchelys parasiticus from the central north Pacific with notes on its metamorphic form. Copeia 1971, 1971, 312–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Organization of the mitogenome of two deep-sea eel specimens. (A) H. bathybius and (B) S. parasitica. The inner ring shows the GC content in the mitogenome.
Figure 1. Organization of the mitogenome of two deep-sea eel specimens. (A) H. bathybius and (B) S. parasitica. The inner ring shows the GC content in the mitogenome.
Jmse 12 01427 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the mtCO1 gene sequences. Bassozetus compressus and Bassozetus glutionsus (Ophidiidae eel family) were used as the outgroup.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the mtCO1 gene sequences. Bassozetus compressus and Bassozetus glutionsus (Ophidiidae eel family) were used as the outgroup.
Jmse 12 01427 g002
Table 1. H. bathybius mitogenome organization.
Table 1. H. bathybius mitogenome organization.
GeneLocationLength (bp)StrandStart CodonStop CodonIntergenic Region *
tRNA-Phe1–7070+ -
s-rRNA71–1024954+ 0
tRNA-Val1025–109470+ 0
l-rRNA1133–28081676+ −62
tRNA-Leu2809–288375+ 0
ND12884–3852969+ATGTAA0
tRNA-Ile3862–393170+ 9
tRNA-Gln3931–400171 −1
tRNA-Met4001–406969+ −1
ND24070–51161047+ATGTAG0
tRNA-Trp5115–518470+ −2
tRNA-Ala5187–525569 2
tRNA-Asn5257–532973 1
tRNA-Cys5367–543165 37
tRNA-Tyr5432–550271 0
COX15504–70781575+GTGTAA1
tRNA-Ser7087–715771 8
tRNA-Asp7163–723270+ 5
COX27239–7929691+ATGT--6
tRNA-Lys7930–800475+ 0
ATP88006–8173168+ATGTAA1
ATP68164–8847684+ATGTAA−10
COX38847–9632786+ATGTAA−1
tRNA-Gly9632–970372+ −1
ND39704–10,054351+ATGTAG0
tRNA-Arg10,053–10,12270+ 0
ND4L10,123–10,419297+ATGTAA−2
ND410,413–11,7931381+ATGT--0
tRNA-His11,794–11,86269+ 0
tRNA-Ser11,863–11,93169+ 0
tRNA-Leu11,932–12,00473+ 0
ND512,005–13,8461842+ATGTAA0
ND613,843–14,364522ATGTAG−4
tRNA-Glu14,365–14,43369 0
CYTB14,438–15,5771140+ATGTAG6
tRNA-Thr15,580–15,65273+ 4
tRNA-Pro15,658–15,72770 5
* Negative intergenic nucleotides indicate overlapping sequences between adjacent genes.
Table 2. S. parasitica mitogenome organization.
Table 2. S. parasitica mitogenome organization.
GeneLocationLength (bp)StrandStart CodonStop CodonIntergenic Region *
tRNA-Phe1–7070+ -
s-rRNA71–1023953+ 0
tRNA-Val1024–109370+ 0
l-rRNA1094–28061713+ 0
tRNA-Leu2807–288175+ 0
ND12882–3850969+ATGTAA0
tRNA-Ile3860–392869+ 9
tRNA-Gln3928–399871 −1
tRNA-Met3998–406669+ −1
ND24067–51131047+ATGTAG0
tRNA-Trp5112–518372+ −2
tRNA-Ala5186–525469 2
tRNA-Asn5256–532873 1
tRNA-Cys5366–543065 37
tRNA-Tyr5431–550171 0
COX15503–70771575+GTGTAA1
tRNA-Ser7086–715671 8
tRNA-Asp7162–723170+ 5
COX27238–7928691+ATGT--5
tRNA-Lys7929–800375+ 6
ATP88005–8172168+ATGTAA0
ATP68163–8846684+ATGTAA1
COX38846–9631786+ATGTAA−10
tRNA-Gly9631–970272+ −1
ND39703–10,053351+ATGTAG−1
tRNA-Arg10,052–10,12170+ 0
ND4L10,122–10,418297+ATGTAA−2
ND410,412–11,7921381+ATGT--0
tRNA-His11,793–11,86169+ −7
tRNA-Ser11,862–11,93069+ 0
tRNA-Leu11,931–12,00373+ 0
ND512,004–13,8451842+ATGTAA0
ND613,842–14,363522ATGTAA0
tRNA-Glu14,364–14,43269 −4
CYTB14,437–15,5761140+ATGTAG0
tRNA-Thr15,579–15,65173+ 4
tRNA-Pro15,656–15,72570 2
* Negative intergenic nucleotides indicate overlapping sequences between adjacent genes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, J.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, B.-J.; Hyeon, J.-Y.; Noh, C.H.; Choi, Y.-U. Complete Mitogenomes of Deep-Sea Eels Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica and a New Record of H. bathybius from the East Mariana Basin, Western Pacific Ocean. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081427

AMA Style

Han J, Kim H-J, Kim B-J, Hyeon J-Y, Noh CH, Choi Y-U. Complete Mitogenomes of Deep-Sea Eels Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica and a New Record of H. bathybius from the East Mariana Basin, Western Pacific Ocean. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(8):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Jeonghoon, Han-Jun Kim, Byung-Jik Kim, Ji-Yeon Hyeon, Choong Hwan Noh, and Young-Ung Choi. 2024. "Complete Mitogenomes of Deep-Sea Eels Histiobranchus bathybius and Simenchelys parasitica and a New Record of H. bathybius from the East Mariana Basin, Western Pacific Ocean" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 8: 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop