Next Article in Journal
ShipNetSim: An Open-Source Simulator for Real-Time Energy Consumption and Emission Analysis in Large-Scale Maritime Networks
Previous Article in Journal
The Integration of a Medium-Resolution Underwater Radioactivity System in the COSYNA Observing System at Helgoland Island, Germany
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Non-Linearities in Humpback Whale Song Units
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance

by
Frank McQuarrie, Jr.
1,2,
C. Brock Woodson
1 and
Catherine R. Edwards
2,*
1
College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
2
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Savannah, GA 31411, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(3), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517
Submission received: 3 February 2025 / Revised: 1 March 2025 / Accepted: 5 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Marine Bioacoustics)

Abstract

Acoustic telemetry is a tool for tracking animals, but transmitted signals from tagged animals are not always detected. Detection efficiency declines with increasing background noise, which can have both abiotic and biotic sources. The abiotic noise present in reef environments (waves, bubbles, etc.) is primarily low-frequency, but snapping shrimp create high-frequency noise that can interfere with transmission detections. Prior work in shallow coastal reefs correlated winds with less high-frequency background noise, and hypothesized that it was due to a balance of biotic and/or abiotic factors: shrimp may be less active during high wind events, and sound attenuation at the surface increases with wave height. To test this hypothesis, passive acoustic recordings from a live-bottom reef are used to quantify snapping shrimp snap rate. Snap rate was strongly correlated with temperature, and warmer environments appeared to be challenging for acoustic telemetry. However, the majority of synoptic variability in noise is shown to be driven by abiotic attenuation. Wind speed has little to no effect on snapping shrimp behavior, but has a significant inverse correlation with high-frequency noise levels due to surface attenuation of high-frequency noise, and therefore a positive effect on detection efficiency, pointing to primarily abiotic forcing behind noise variability and resulting telemetry success. This research gives context to previously collected detection data and can be leveraged to help plan future acoustic arrays in shallow, complex, and/or noisy environments, potentially predicting changes in detection range.
Keywords: transmission interference; bioacoustics; surface bubble attenuation; snapping shrimp transmission interference; bioacoustics; surface bubble attenuation; snapping shrimp

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McQuarrie, F., Jr.; Woodson, C.B.; Edwards, C.R. A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517

AMA Style

McQuarrie F Jr., Woodson CB, Edwards CR. A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(3):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517

Chicago/Turabian Style

McQuarrie, Frank, Jr., C. Brock Woodson, and Catherine R. Edwards. 2025. "A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 3: 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517

APA Style

McQuarrie, F., Jr., Woodson, C. B., & Edwards, C. R. (2025). A Reef’s High-Frequency Soundscape and the Effect on Telemetry Efforts: A Biotic and Abiotic Balance. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop