Next Article in Journal
Regional Scale Risk-Informed Land-Use Planning Using Probabilistic Coastline Recession Modelling and Economical Optimisation: East Coast of Sri Lanka
Next Article in Special Issue
Ice Forecasting in the Next-Generation Great Lakes Operational Forecast System (GLOFS)
Previous Article in Journal
Iterative Frequency-Domain Response of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines with Parametric Drag
Previous Article in Special Issue
Baroclinic Effect on Modeling Deep Flow in Brown Passage, BC, Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrodynamic Zone of Influence Due to a Floating Structure in a Fjordal Estuary—Hood Canal Bridge Impact Assessment

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6(4), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040119
Submission received: 17 September 2018 / Revised: 6 October 2018 / Accepted: 10 October 2018 / Published: 15 October 2018

Abstract

Floating structures such as barges and ships affect near-field hydrodynamics and create a zone of influence (ZOI). Extent of the ZOI is of particular interest due to potential obstruction to and impact on out-migrating juvenile fish. Here, we present an assessment of ZOI from Hood Canal (Floating) Bridge, located within the 110-km-long fjord-like Hood Canal sub-basin in the Salish Sea, Washington. A field data collection program allowed near-field validation of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of Hood Canal with the floating bridge section embedded. The results confirm that Hood Canal Bridge, with a draft of 4.6 m covering ~85% of the width of Hood Canal, obstructs the brackish outflow surface layer. This induces increased local mixing near the bridge, causes pooling of water (up-current) during ebb and flood, and results in shadow/sheltering of water (down-current). The change in ambient currents, salinity, and temperature is highest at the bridge location and reduces to background levels with distance from the bridge. The ZOI extends ~20 m below the surface and varies from 2–3 km for currents, from 2–4 km for salinity, and from 2–5 km for temperature before the deviations with the bridge drop to <10% relative to simulated background conditions without the bridge present.
Keywords: Hood Canal; floating bridge; Salish Sea; hydrodynamics; Finite-Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM); circulation; anthropogenic impact; zone of influence; Salish Sea model Hood Canal; floating bridge; Salish Sea; hydrodynamics; Finite-Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM); circulation; anthropogenic impact; zone of influence; Salish Sea model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khangaonkar, T.; Nugraha, A.; Wang, T. Hydrodynamic Zone of Influence Due to a Floating Structure in a Fjordal Estuary—Hood Canal Bridge Impact Assessment. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040119

AMA Style

Khangaonkar T, Nugraha A, Wang T. Hydrodynamic Zone of Influence Due to a Floating Structure in a Fjordal Estuary—Hood Canal Bridge Impact Assessment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2018; 6(4):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khangaonkar, Tarang, Adi Nugraha, and Taiping Wang. 2018. "Hydrodynamic Zone of Influence Due to a Floating Structure in a Fjordal Estuary—Hood Canal Bridge Impact Assessment" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 6, no. 4: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040119

APA Style

Khangaonkar, T., Nugraha, A., & Wang, T. (2018). Hydrodynamic Zone of Influence Due to a Floating Structure in a Fjordal Estuary—Hood Canal Bridge Impact Assessment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 6(4), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop