Next Article in Journal
Fostering Community Ownership for Sustainable Social Innovations in Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Eco-Systemic Flourishing: Expanding the Meta-Framework for 21st-Century Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental Humanities South: Decolonizing Nature in Highland Asia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unseen Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in This Global Health Crisis

by
Madeline E. Graham
1,*,
Brenda A. Wilson
1,2,*,
Davendra Ramkumar
1,
Holly Rosencranz
1 and
Japhia Ramkumar
1,*
1
Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 506 Matthews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
2
Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 505 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Challenges 2025, 16(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16020022
Submission received: 29 October 2024 / Revised: 14 April 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 21 April 2025

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent global health threat with many anthropogenic drivers outside of healthcare. The impacts of modern agriculture on human health are manifold, from the food systems and dietary patterns they support to the less apparent effects of environmental stresses and biodiversity loss in ecosystems. Intensive practices, such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, induce abiotic stresses that deplete biodiversity and drive AMR in soil and aquatic microbiomes. The overuse of antibiotics in livestock production is another major driver of AMR. Changes in weather patterns due to climate change have the potential to exacerbate these issues as warmer and wetter weather increases the potential for bacterial infection. While practices exist to address healthcare-associated drivers, the impact of agriculture and environmental destruction are not widely appreciated in healthcare and biomedical sciences. It is imperative that healthcare professionals and public health experts understand these connections to properly address the emergent issue of AMR. This review aims to summarize the current data on important agricultural and environmental drivers of AMR for educational purposes, to fill gaps in knowledge, and to improve current practices and stimulate further research.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), namely the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria, is one of the most pressing global health challenges. The rise of AMR in bacteria is of particular concern due to the rapid rate at which they develop resistance [1]. AMR currently causes substantial morbidity and mortality with a recent Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study estimating that 1.14 million deaths were caused directly by resistant bacteria and 4.71 million associated with AMR in 2021 [2]. This study projects that AMR will become a leading cause of mortality, directly causing an estimated 1.91 million deaths and contributing to 8.22 million deaths, by 2050 if current trends in the spread and acquisition of AMR continue [2]. The contributions of antimicrobial use, chiefly antibiotic use, in healthcare settings to AMR are widely appreciated and are the main focus of initiatives to address AMR [3]. The widespread use and misuse of antibiotics clinically exerts selective pressures on the bacterial pathogens they aim to treat and induce resistance [4,5]. The cumulative acquisition of resistance to many antibiotics, resulting in the emergence of so-called “superbugs”, may lead us to a “post-antibiotic era” in which we have limited tools to fight bacterial infections. Nosocomial infections associated with AMR have increased markedly since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, though measures to combat the spread are in place [6].
While initiatives to promote antibiotic stewardship and more judicious use of antibiotics have been implemented in many healthcare settings, these programs do not address other powerful anthropogenic drivers of AMR, such as modern intensive crop and animal agriculture, and global climate change [3,7]. A 2023 study determined that roughly 8% of Escherichia coli strains responsible for causing urinary tract infections in a U.S. population came from livestock and their meat, providing clear evidence that bacteria with acquired AMR from agricultural sources can readily infect people, even distant consumers [8]. Recognition of the contributions of agriculture to the development and spread of AMR through a One Health lens that appreciates the interconnectedness between environmental, animal, and human health [9] is crucial to our success in managing it. It is imperative that healthcare professionals and public health experts understand the environmental and food-related sources of AMR as a consequence of industrial agricultural practices. Medical professionals must understand the key contributors of AMR coming from outside of healthcare settings so that they may appropriately address the growing public health threat AMR poses. Furthermore, veterinarians, public health officials, and policy makers must have a harmonized understanding of the factors driving AMR so that we may develop comprehensive strategies to address it.
In this narrative review, we describe how industrial agricultural practices deplete biodiversity and contribute to the rise of AMR. We discuss how climate change may further accelerate AMR and compromise the productivity of our food systems. We discuss the state of human and veterinary medical education on the topics of antimicrobial stewardship and AMR. Additionally, we present here an example of a medical curriculum that explores the role of food systems as determinants of human health and explores factors in modern industrial agriculture that contribute to AMR. As AMR is a true One Health issue, it will require a concerted effort to promote harmonized education across medical and health fields and transdisciplinary approaches to properly address it. We hope that this review will provide a primer on important drivers of AMR outside of healthcare to help supplement medical education.

2. Background

2.1. The Study of AMR and Importance of Education

The appraisal of factors contributing to AMR and proposed initiatives to address it have historically been siloed to different isolated fields with limited communication or collaboration. The study of AMR has been compartmentalized to the fields of veterinary medicine, microbiology, pharmacology, and public health [3,10]. There has been very little cross communication, with each field working independently. This has led to many fragmented strategies that incompletely address the sources and factors influencing AMR [11]. More recent policy encourages a more holistic One Health approach to work toward more comprehensive measures to address AMR [12,13]. There is growing recognition of AMR as a planetary health issue and increasing research on the influence of environmental factors, including climate change, on its spread from sources [14,15]. The World Health Organization (WHO) acknowledges that agriculture and the widespread use of antibiotics in livestock is a major contributor to AMR. They have formed a quadripartite joint committee with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the UN Environment Program, and the World Organization for Animal Health to appraise the contributions of agriculture and veterinary medicine on AMR [16]. While agriculture is understood to be a major driver of AMR by the WHO and other presiding public health organizations, education about these issues at the level of healthcare and veterinary medical professionals is still lacking.
As prescribers of antibiotics, it is imperative that human and veterinary medical providers are educated on AMR and how their practices contribute to key sources of AMR. The Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (PACCARB) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a report in June 2021 recommending increased efforts to educate human and animal health professionals, as well as the general public, about agricultural sources of AMR in an effort to combat the growing problem [17]. Undergraduate medical education is a particularly important time where future physicians learn the basic sciences, begin to develop clinical reasoning, and form attitudes around different practices. Thus, early education on the various sources of AMR and physicians’ roles in addressing and combating it could have profound impacts on the future generation of physicians.
To date, medical curricula on the emergence of AMR and the practice of antibiotic stewardship in medical training programs are very limited, with few offered during undergraduate medical education [18,19]. Instruction on AMR and antibiotic stewardship is mostly limited to fellowship training in Infectious Diseases, which further perpetuates AMR and antibiotic stewardship as a siloed issue to be addressed by a single medical specialty [18,19,20]. Among these programs, few discuss the origins of resistant bacteria outside of healthcare [21,22]. Similarly, antimicrobial stewardship training and education on the sources and scale of AMR is lacking in veterinary education. A 2021 European study revealed that only 25% of senior veterinary students polled across 30 countries were familiar with the guidelines for antibiotic use [23]. A 2024 survey of veterinary schools in the U.S. and Caribbean revealed that only 50% of programs polled had an antimicrobial stewardship committee and only two programs offered activities on AMR and antimicrobial stewardship [24]. Human and veterinary medical providers must collaborate at the frontline of AMR to ensure a comprehensive approach to combat it.
One course that aims to bridge these gaps in knowledge in undergraduate medical education is Microbiomes Matter: The Path to Regenerative Systems of Farm, Food and Health in the Age of Climate Change, which is offered at the Carle Illinois College of Medicine at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign [25]. This truly multidisciplinary course explores agriculture and its myriad large-scale effects on the environment, underscoring its role as a key contributor to AMR.

2.2. Industrial Agricultural Practices and Their Impact on the Environment

Modern industrial agricultural practices, which form the basis of food systems in many wealthy countries, are a leading contributor to loss of global biodiversity and are a major threat to planetary and human health [26]. Large-scale industrial agricultural systems rely on intensive practices to maximize the production of crops and include the use of chemical inputs, such as fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, the development and planting of genetically-modified disease-resistant plants, large-scale monocropping, intensive tillage of the soils with minimal fallow periods, and large concentrated animal husbandry and feeding operations [27,28]. The rapid expansion of industrial agriculture globally in the past 50 years has destroyed natural vegetation, displaced wildlife, and dramatically reduced insect populations [29]. While the more apparent effects of this loss, such as the destruction of native habitats and endangerment of animal species are appreciated, many unseen perturbations at the level of microbial communities pose emergent threats to human health [30,31]. These threats include depletion of the ecosystems that support the health and productivity of soils and instead enable the spread of drug-resistant bacteria that threaten the health of plants, animals, and humans [16,32].

2.3. Soil Microbiota: The Unseen Ecosystems

Soil is a vast reservoir of microbiota, containing abundant microbial biomass composed of upwards of 50,000 species [33,34]. Generally, bacteria and fungi comprise the majority of soil microbiota [35], and are important members of the ecosystem [36]. Soil microbiota play many important roles in nutrient cycling, shaping the quality of soils, and directly influence the health and productivity of plants through coevolutionary relationships [34,37]. The diversity of soil microbiota determines the metabolic capacity to cycle nutrients, provides functional redundancy, and strengthens resilience of soils to changes in the environment [38]. Thus, the health of soils and their microbiomes is crucial to the health of plants and the sustainability of our food systems.
Soil microbes have evolved mechanisms that enable them to adapt to their environments and resist various stresses, including exposure to antimicrobial agents from competing organisms and anthropogenic activity [5,39]. Microbes can acquire AMR through autogenetic mutation or the acquisition of genes. Bacteria have mechanisms that allow for the rapid exchange of genes, including antibiotic resistance genes (ARG), via horizontal gene transfer of mobile genetic elements, enabling AMR to spread rapidly through soil and other environmental and host organism microbiomes [40,41,42]. The practices used in modern industrial agriculture are recognized as potent drivers of AMR [43,44]. The intensive management of soils through tillage and use of chemical inputs, such as inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and manure from animals treated with antibiotics, alter the makeup of soil microbiomes and provide strong pressures that select for resistance traits, accelerating the spread of AMR, as depicted in Figure 1 [7,34,45]. Further, the reduction in soil microbiome diversity caused by intensive agricultural practices [46,47] may permit resistant and pathogenic microbes to proliferate and spread due to lack of competition for resources [7,48].

2.4. Industrial Livestock Production

Industrial animal production is a major contributor to the rise of AMR. The high demand for animal protein in western diets motivates intensive agriculture of feed crops and practices to support high density animal farming, such as concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Historically, these practices have included the use of antibiotics to prevent and treat infections in livestock, which spread readily in crowded and confined operations, and to promote faster growth [49]. The doses of antibiotics used are often sub-bactericidal and subinhibitory, the chronic application of which favors emergence of resistant microbial strains over more sensitive ones [50]. After recent increases in their use following restrictions on the use of antibiotics in feed in 2017 in the United States (U.S.), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued regulations that ended over-the-counter access of medically important antibiotics in 2023 [51]. Medically important antibiotics are defined as classes of antibiotics that are used therapeutically in human medicine [52]. The new regulations require veterinarian authorization for the administration of antibiotics in livestock for food production [53]. Prior to these restrictions, farmers could readily purchase a wide array of antibiotics of many medically important classes over the counter, including macrolides, sulfonamides, cephalosporins, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and others with very little oversight of their use [49]. While this will hopefully curb some of the pressures inducing AMR in animal agriculture in the U.S., the pervasive use of medically important antibiotics in agriculture remains a global issue and is expected to increase with rising demands for animal protein to feed growing populations [54,55].
In the following review, we explore the mechanisms through which intensive agriculture and livestock production contribute to AMR and discuss global climate change as a driver of AMR. We highlight the effects of chemical pesticides used in intensive agriculture on AMR in pathogenic bacteria, as depicted in Figure 1. We also consider other effects of current industrial food systems on human health.

3. Review of Current Sources and Drivers of AMR in the Environment

3.1. Influence of Industrial Crop Production on Soil Microbial Diversity and AMR

Synthetic fertilizers, insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides that are used widely around the world to support industrial crop production harm biodiversity at multiple levels and drive AMR in soil microbes. Worldwide, nearly 300 million tons of pesticides are used in agriculture [56]. In addition to their adverse effects on human, animal, and plant health, these chemicals are disruptive to the microbial communities present in soils [57,58]. Chemical pesticides induce AMR and the acquisition of ARGs to medically important antibiotics. Pesticides promote many mechanisms of AMR, including efflux pump activation, membrane pore closure, and the induction of gene mutation. They also promote the transfer of AMRs via conjugation by increasing membrane permeability and increasing the proportion of mobile gene elements (Figure 1) [59]. Exposure to typical application levels of the commonly used herbicide, dicamba (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) was associated with enhanced tolerance of the bacterial pathogens Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli to the medically important antibiotics chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline. It also enhanced tolerance to ampicillin in S. enterica Typhimurium [60]. The popular herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) induced tolerance to kanamycin in both S. enterica Typhimurium and E. coli [60]. Further, the loss of soil microbial diversity brought on by intensive tillage and chemical inputs may create niches for multidrug-resistant bacteria, or “superbugs”, to proliferate [48,61].
The microbial composition of healthy soils influences our health by shaping the nutrients present in the foods grown in them, which in turn influence our own microbiomes. There is a growing body of evidence that we and the microbiota that inhabit our gut, which we rely on heavily for numerous physiological processes, have evolved with the microbiota in our environment, including many that are found in soils [30,62]. Conventional industrial farming methods are associated with decreased microbial diversity [45,46,63], which may influence the composition of our own gut microbiomes and the quality of the food we eat. Emerging evidence indicates that foods from industrial agricultural practices lack nutritive value compared to foods grown with organic or regenerative agricultural practices, which do not rely as heavily on chemical inputs and support soil health [64,65,66]. Through social and economic factors, industrialized food systems support Western diets high in ultra-processed foods that are high in saturated fats and sugar and lacking micronutrients and fiber [67], which contribute to gut dysbiosis and the rise of non-communicable chronic diseases [25]. Our current food systems that were intended to provide abundant nutrition and promote good health are yielding foods with suboptimal nutritional value, while contributing to health risks, such as gut microbial dysbiosis and AMR.

3.2. Influence of Conventional Livestock Production on AMR

Globally, about 99,000 tons of antibiotics were used in animal agriculture in 2020 and that quantity is expected to increase [55]. Regions with particularly high quantities of antibiotics used relative to total animal weight include China, Brazil, India, the U.S., and Australia. In terms of intensity, the highest users of antibiotics were concentrated in Asia, with China, India, and Thailand accounting for 67% of global hotspots [55]. Outside of Asia, regions with high intensity of antimicrobials included northern Italy, northern Germany, central Poland, the Midwest of the U.S., and Brazil [55]. The adoption of Western diets as countries industrialize has increased the demand for animal protein [68] and consequently increased the scale of animal agriculture and related antibiotic use [54].
Antibiotics have been used in the production of animal foods for the past 80 years. They were initially used to treat and control infections, but over time were less discriminately used as food and water additives for prophylaxis and growth promotion in livestock production and to preserve seafood [69]. Due to concerns about AMR, the U.S. and European Union established regulations to curb the use of antibiotics in agriculture with varying success. The U.S. trails behind the European Union in its efforts to curb antibiotic use in livestock production. A study tracking the trajectory of antibiotic use in agriculture found that the top livestock producing countries in the European Union decreased the intensity of antibiotic use by greater than 50% in the past decade in the wake of policy that focused on prevention of disease through enhanced surveillance and other efforts to promote the health of animals [70]. From 2016 to 2020, including the period after the restriction of the use of medically important antibiotics as feed additives, the U.S. showed reductions in antibiotic use in chickens by 49% but increases in use in cattle by 5.3%, swine by 12.1%, and turkeys by 11.6% [70]. The 2023 US FDA policy ending the over-the-counter sale and requirement of veterinary oversight for medically important antibiotics is an important step toward improving the judicious use of antibiotics in agriculture. Nations that recently adopted industrial livestock production practices continue to perpetuate these issues around indiscriminate antibiotic use in agriculture and are predicted to increase their use with growing populations and higher demands for animal products [54,55]. Livestock production will continue to contribute to AMR on a global scale without concerted international policy.
Even the use of antibiotics that are not directly specified for use in human medicine is a major contributor to the rise of AMR. Historically, the widespread use of tylosin, a macrolide antibiotic as a growth promoter and prophylactic in livestock has driven the emergence of AMR in multiple animal hosts [5,71]. The brief use of avoparcin, an analogue of the medically important antibiotic vancomycin, as a growth promoter in Europe led to the emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, particularly Enterococcus faecium in animals, humans and the environment [5]. This was particularly worrisome, as vancomycin is used as a drug of last resort against multidrug-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, both of which are common hospital-acquired pathogens. Farmers in China used colistin, polymyxin E, as a feed additive for prophylaxis for nearly three decades prior to the ban of its use in 2017 [72]. Colistin is used sparingly in human medicine due to its adverse effects and is reserved as a last resort option to treat highly resistant Gram-negative infections with Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii [5]. The widespread use of colistin as a feed additive has led to the rise of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1, which is plasmid-mediated and readily transmissible via horizontal gene transfer [73]. Disturbingly, this gene has been observed in clinical E. coli isolates, termed MCRPEC, and is attributed to zoonotic transmission [73,74]. The continued persistence of MCRPEC in humans is attributed in part to the continued use of colistin as a feed additive in low- and middle-income countries, including Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria, despite bans (Figure 2) [74].
Animal derived food products, such as dairy, meat, and eggs, have been demonstrated to carry zoonotic pathogens and associated ARGs [8,75,76,77]. Thus, transmission of zoonotic pathogens with acquired ARGs from plant foods contaminated with animal wastes and animal foods is a growing concern as depicted in Figure 3.
The widespread use of antibiotics in livestock poses consequences for the management and traditional use of their wastes. Manures from conventional livestock agriculture are used as fertilizers for crops around the world and hold promise as a more sustainable source of nutrients compared to industrially-produced synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions [78,79]. While manures present a good alternative, the high loads of ARGs driven by widespread antibiotic use pose potential hazards (Figure 2). A study from Spain found that manure slurries from local swine farms contained high levels of tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones and moderate levels of sulfonamides. See Table 1 for a summary of medically important antibiotics used in animal agriculture. The bacteria in these swine slurries had high loads of class 1 integron-integrase, a type of mobile genetic element that is associated with the acquisition of ARGs [80], as well as ARGs that confer resistance to tetracyclines, sulfonamides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams [81]. The ARGs that provide resistance to sulfonamides and tetracyclines transferred to crops grown using swine manure fertilizer and were detected in the edible parts of radishes and lettuces [81]. The study demonstrates the potential for transmission of ARGs from agricultural settings to human microbiomes through plant foods (Figure 3).
The antibiotic residues present in these manure fertilizers have the potential to influence soil microbes as well. Antibiotic residues can remain active in soils long after they are introduced, with many medically important antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin and several other fluoroquinolones, persisting for nearly two months. Other relevant antibiotics with the potential to remain in soils include the macrolide erythromycin, the lincosamide clindamycin, the sulfonamide sulfamethazine, and the tetracyclines oxytetracycline and tetracycline [82]. These antibiotics can induce changes in the bacterial composition of soils and lead to the acquisition and spread of ARGs [15], potentially giving rise to dominant multidrug-resistant bacteria [48]. Contamination of land with antibiotic-treated animal wastes and transfer of ARGs to other microbiomes poses another source of AMR in modern industrial agriculture.
Metal additives in animal feed further drive AMR, especially when administered with other antibiotics. The use of zinc, copper, and other metal ions as growth promoting additives in animal feed contributes to the acquisition of metal resistance genes, which may facilitate the co-selection of ARGs [83]. A study evaluated the ARG profiles of bacteria in manure from Chinese swine farms and found ARGs conferring resistance to tetracyclines and macrolides as well as multidrug resistance genes encoding efflux pumps. They found that these ARGs were associated with the levels of metals in the manure, with zinc concentration strongly associated with multidrug resistance genes and chromium associated with the class 1 integron-integrase, intI1 [83]. They observed that intI1 and the ARG tetW, which confers resistance to tetracyclines, were highly associated with metal resistance genes in bacteria from agricultural soils fertilized with the swine manure. ARGs against tetracyclines and macrolides as well as fluoroquinolones were found in sediments in ponds where the treated manure slurry was disposed [83]. This highlights the potential interactions between antibiotics and other anthropogenic changes to soil, such as metal contamination in driving AMR, and the importance of more careful agricultural wastewater management in mitigating spread.

3.3. Effects of Global Climate Change on AMR and Food Systems

Global climate change is projected to exacerbate the development and spread of AMR through multiple mechanisms. Rising temperatures increase the rate of bacterial proliferation and increase the risk of infection, as seen in rising incidence of infection in summer months [84,85]. In addition to the rising temperatures, climate change increases the occurrence of extreme weather events with heavy precipitation and subsequent flooding, which increases waterborne transmission of bacteria and their ARGs [86]. Increases in extreme weather events, including droughts and flooding, undermine the productivity of our agricultural systems [87]. Not surprisingly, the warmer and wetter ambient conditions and increased flooding due to climate change create a breeding ground for drug-resistant bacteria, spreading AMR [88,89,90] and increasing the likelihood of infection while compromising our food systems, collectively spelling disaster (Figure 4).
The escalation in unpredictable weather patterns and rising global temperatures due to global climate change have the potential to exacerbate the already mounting issue of AMR. Increasing temperatures promote the growth of bacteria and increase the risk of certain infections [91,92]. A meta-analysis by Chua and colleagues revealed that each 1 °C increase in average temperature was associated with increased incidence of enteric infection with a 5% increased risk of salmonellosis, 7% for shigellosis, 2% for campylobacteriosis, 5% for cholera, 4% for E. coli enteritis, and 15% for typhoid [93]. The mechanisms by which bacteria develop temperature resistance and AMR are related and support observations that acquisition of AMR and rising temperatures due to global climate change are intimately linked [44,94]. Proposed mechanisms by which increasing temperatures contribute to AMR include increased horizontal gene transfer, increased mutation rates, in addition to changes in the spread of bacteria and ARGs through waterways [44,95]. Hotter temperatures are associated with increased incidence of infection by resistant bacteria. A Chinese study demonstrated that every 1 °C increase in ambient temperature was associated with a 4.7% increase in detection of third generation cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae and a 10.7% increase in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in patient populations across 31 provinces [90]. A separate Chinese study found similar associations of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae with a 14% increase with every 1 °C increase in annual temperature as well as a 6% increase in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa [89]. These findings are particularly concerning due to current reliance on carbapenems as a last resort antibiotic to treat resistant infections. A study examining the effect of geographical variation in temperature on AMR found that a 10 °C increase in temperature across regions was associated with increases in AMR in E. coli by 4.2%, K. pneumoniae by 2.2%, and Staphylococcus aureus by 2.7% in the U.S. [88]. These findings demonstrate that, in addition to the direct effects of heat on human health, AMR poses a substantial public health threat.
The rising incidence of extreme weather events, such as heavy precipitation from hurricanes and related runoff and flooding, increases the potential for waterborne transmission of pathogens and spread of ARGs in addition to other devastating effects on affected populations [96,97]. The flood waters from tropical storms are known to permit the waterborne spread of bacteria from numerous sources, including sewer systems. A U.S. study found that exposure to tropical storm flood waters was associated with a 48% increase in Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infections 1 week after and a 42% increase in Legionella pneumophila infections 2 weeks after tropical storms [97]. A study demonstrated that the flooding after Hurricane Harvey in Texas, U.S. increased levels of ARGs conferring resistance to beta-lactams and higher loads of human fecal origin bacteria, including E. coli, Enterococcus spp., and Salmonella spp. in coastal sediments, and that elevated loads remained for several months [98]. Flooding following the storm also affected urban soils, causing transient increases in the ARGs tet(E) and blaCMY-2 and intl1, conferring resistance to tetracyclines, beta-lactams, and class 1 integron-integrase, respectively [99]. The potential for extreme precipitation events to provide opportunities for the mingling and dispersal of bacteria and ARGs in runoff from agricultural fields and waste streams is deeply concerning and could have disastrous effects if not addressed.
The effects of climate change have also influenced the growth of many marine pathogens, such as Vibrio spp. Changes in precipitation patterns and heatwaves alter the salinity, temperature and other properties of marine environments that facilitate bacterial proliferation and the spread of infection [100]. A study that examined the metagenomes of pathogens in the Florida Gulf Coast following Hurricane Ian and a subsequent spike in cases of Vibrio spp. infection found numerous ARGs and mobile genetic elements in Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus [101]. Thus, mitigation of climate change effects must be an important part of the effort to curb the spread of AMR.
Global climate change threatens the productivity of agricultural systems for food production, particularly large monocropping operations. Extremes in weather, particularly heat and drought, threaten the productivity of agricultural operations globally, especially in the developing world and Global South [102]. However, no nation is immune to the effects of climate change indefinitely and industrialized nations experience substantial decreases in productivity with extreme weather [103,104]. Climate change is projected to affect the growing seasons and productivity of major crops, including wheat, maize, rice, and soybean, with a mean projected decrease of 11% without adaptation of appropriate agricultural methods in the next 25 years [105]. Extreme precipitation events and flooding resulting from climate change has led to large crop losses and drastic projected reductions in arable land suitable for growing healthy crops [106]. With the global population projected to grow to 9.8 billion in that time [107], it will be very important to adapt agricultural methods to be more sustainable and tolerant to the effects of climate change. Further expansion of agricultural lands and intensification of practices with increased inputs could provide a temporary boost to productivity, but are ultimately disastrous to already threatened biodiversity and are not sustainable [108].
Expansion of agricultural lands and increased intensification of the practices used not only harm biodiversity but also have the potential to increase the rate and scale of AMR through the mechanisms presented herein [44]. This in concert with other anthropogenic drivers of AMR, including healthcare-associated antimicrobial use and the pollution of environments by wastewater, would lead to an untenable crisis (Figure 5).

4. Future Directions

We offer solution-oriented alternatives to address the current AMR crisis. These include alternative agricultural practices that do not harm biodiversity and do not rely as heavily on chemical inputs, and regulation and policy to improve antimicrobial stewardship and minimize the impacts on environments. Solutions to this crisis must include a multidisciplinary approach involving diverse stakeholders.
At the minimum, efforts to reduce the use of chemical fertilizer and pesticide inputs in crop production and antibiotic use in livestock production are essential to mitigate the spread of AMR. More comprehensive solutions to these challenges require a departure from intensive agricultural practices with its high use of chemical inputs and monoculture cropping. Alternative practices, such as regenerative and organic agricultural practices, do not rely as heavily on chemical inputs and thus do not exert the same pressures driving the emergence and spread of AMR. Studies have demonstrated that organic agricultural practices are associated with lower abundance of ARGs [109,110]. Alternatives to the current large-scale monocropping systems include agroforestry, which is the intentional planting of trees within crop fields, and intercropping, which is the practice of introducing multiple crops or plants in the same field. Agricultural practices, such as agroforestry that establish permaculture with biodiversity, offer more resilience to the effects of climate change by creating wind and temperature-buffered microclimates, as well as more robust root structures that can better tolerate drought and are less dependent on chemical inputs long term [111].
Other plants introduced into the crop field can provide natural pest suppression through natural repellants or as trap plants. For example, the intercropping of oil seeds and cereals with legumes protects the legumes from pathogenic fungi and nematodes [112]. The above ground biodiversity in these systems promote diversity of soil microbiota in part due to the diversity of root systems, plant litters, and microclimates present in agroforestry schemes [113]. These systems have a greater capacity to sequester carbon from the atmosphere and help remediate high atmospheric greenhouse gas levels [114]. Livestock can also be integrated in these farming operations in the practice of silvopasture, which is the management of woodland pasture and forage lands for animals, with mutual benefits to biodiversity and animal health in part by avoiding the crowding and concentrated accumulation of animal wastes that occur in CAFOs (Figure 6) [115]. A shift away from antimicrobials towards other strategies, including vaccination and improved hygiene for livestock disease management, would help reduce the impact of animal agriculture on AMR. In the meantime, waste and wastewater from livestock operations could be managed more carefully to avoid environmental contamination. In addition, research on the transmission of ARGs to commensal enteric bacteria in livestock and environmental microbiota could help identify targets to mitigate the further spread of AMR. Thus, agricultural systems based on biodiverse permaculture offer better sustainability and resilience in the age of climate change and offer the potential to reduce greenhouse gas concentrations while curbing the use of AMR-driving chemical inputs.
Other sources of antibiotic residue contamination in the environment include human wastewater treatment and industrial waste from pharmaceutical factories. The WHO issued a guidance on wastewater and solid waste management from antibiotic manufacturing [116]. They propose guidelines for the management of solid wastes and wastewater, describe technologies to remove antibiotic residues, and outline potential regulatory mechanisms to ensure compliance. Municipal wastewater treatment plants do not effectively remove antibiotics [117]. Enhanced surveillance of antibiotic residues in industrial, municipal, and hospital sewer wastewater will be important to mitigate the further pollution of the environment and spread of ARGs in environmental microbiota. Retrofitting industrial and sewer wastewater systems with systems to more effectively remove antibiotic residues, such as advanced reverse osmosis technology and ozonation, will be crucial next steps in reducing AMR [118].
In addition to curbing resistance to our existing repertoire of antibiotics, we must expand the efforts to develop new antimicrobials. With mounting resistance to existing antimicrobials and limited efforts to curb the perpetuation of AMR, an expanded antimicrobial toolkit is essential. Wilson and Ho discuss avenues for new drug development, including bacterial genome sequencing to identify potential new targets and the use of bacteriophages, viruses that infect and can kill bacteria, as alternative therapeutic agents [5]. Drug discovery is a costly enterprise and industry interest relies on an immediately favorable market to drive profits. Wilson and Ho propose strategies to provide financial incentives to stimulate and maintain industry participation in the typically unprofitable antibiotic market [5]. They suggest that a combination of upfront financial support for drug discovery, known as push incentives, with measures that promise continued revenue, called pull incentives, would be best to draw industry interest in entering the antibiotic market. These incentives could come from government subscription contracts to support industry partners in novel antimicrobial drug development as has been proposed by the U.S. Pioneering Antimicrobial Subscriptions to End Upsurging Resistance (PASTEUR) Act [5]. International policy that incentivizes the development of new antimicrobials with a combination of push and pull incentives could help stimulate new antimicrobial discovery and development. Patent buyouts, monetary awards, or extension of market exclusivity agreements for other drugs that the company has developed would support antibiotic discovery through development and testing [5]. Judicious use of new antibiotics and alternative methods of prevention and treatment of infections will be necessary to avoid rapid AMR to these new antimicrobials.
AMR is a true planetary health issue and will require a One Health approach in education and policy to effect adequate change. Future efforts to combat AMR and ensure the sustainability of food systems should include interprofessional collaboration and education between a wide range of human and animal medical professionals, agricultural scientists, farmers, and public health officials. Specific One Health curricula on the role of food systems and planetary health as determinants of human health should be implemented in undergraduate medical education worldwide (Figure 7). Existing undergraduate medical curricula on antimicrobial stewardship should be expanded to include education on the specific patterns of AMR induced by agricultural, industrial, and medical activity. The continued assessment and management of healthcare-associated drivers of AMR is crucial, particularly in terms of their interaction with other sources. Policy should promote expanded antimicrobial stewardship education in undergraduate medical education and throughout veterinary and community health education. There should be more emphasis in medical training on the role of physicians as educators of their patients and communities on the proper use and disposal of antibiotics. Healthcare-associated environmental contamination could be mitigated with improved wastewater treatment methods that can more effectively remove antibiotics and other pharmaceuticals from residential and hospital waste streams. Early education on these issues and programs to foster leadership could help inspire future physician leaders to advocate and create policy to limit agricultural contributions to AMR and promote sustainable and judicious practices for food production and infection management.

5. Conclusions

Industrial agriculture has created an outsized and unsustainable system of food and industrial crop and animal production. The practices of monocropping, intensive soil management, and overuse of chemical inputs have simultaneously depleted the microbial biodiversity of soils and thereby have compromised the productivity of land and reduced the quality of the food crops it can support. These practices have also hastened the acquisition of ARGs, which now poses another emergent health threat. Taken together, these unintended consequences of extractive agriculture simultaneously deplete the diversity of soil microbiota and select for antimicrobial resistance, creating niches for these “superbugs” to flourish. The overall outcome threatens the viability of our food production systems and the efficacy of our already compromised tools to fight infection. The future of human health depends on the sustainability and resilience of our food systems to climate change as well as our efforts to combat antibiotic resistance. It is imperative that current and future healthcare providers understand the impacts of AMR drivers within and outside of healthcare so that we may effectively treat and manage the spread of resistant pathogens. Similarly, other stakeholders in other sectors need to have a comprehensive understanding of AMR beyond their area of expertise. There are solutions to this crisis, including regenerative agriculture, wastewater management, antimicrobial drug development and regulation, which require the efforts of a multidisciplinary team. The collaboration between different industries and concerted efforts toward a common goal will provide the best chance to chart a pathway towards a sustainable future for human and planetary health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.G., B.A.W. and J.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.G.; writing—review and editing, M.E.G., B.A.W., J.R., D.R. and H.R.; visualization, M.E.G., B.A.W. and J.R.; supervision—J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was not supported by any funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mancuso, G.; Midiri, A.; Gerace, E.; Biondo, C. Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Naghavi, M.; Vollset, S.E.; Ikuta, K.S.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Gray, A.P.; Wool, E.E.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Mestrovic, T.; Smith, G.; Han, C.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2013; 2021: A systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mudenda, S.; Daka, V.; Matafwali, S.K. World Health Organization AWaRe framework for antibiotic stewardship: Where are we now and where do we need to go? An expert viewpoint. Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol. 2023, 3, e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Frieri, M.; Kumar, K.; Boutin, A. Antibiotic resistance. J. Infect. Public Health 2017, 10, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wilson, B.A.; Ho, B.T. Revenge of the Microbes, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  6. CDC. Antimicrobial Resistance Threats in the United States, 2021–2022 [Fact Sheet]; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  7. Goryluk-Salmonowicz, A.; Popowska, M. Factors promoting and limiting antimicrobial resistance in the environment—Existing knowledge gaps. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 992268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, C.M.; Aziz, M.; Park, D.E.; Wu, Z.; Stegger, M.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Schmidlin, K.; Johnson, T.J.; Koch, B.J. Using source-associated mobile genetic elements to identify zoonotic extraintestinal E. coli infections. One Health 2023, 16, 100518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adisasmito, W.B.; Almuhairi, S.; Behravesh, C.B.; Bilivogui, P.; Bukachi, S.A.; Casas, N.; Cediel Becerra, N.; Charron, D.F.; Chaudhary, A.; Ciacci Zanella, J.R.; et al. One Health: A new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rogers Van Katwyk, S.; Hoffman, S.J.; Mendelson, M.; Taljaard, M.; Grimshaw, J.M. Strengthening the science of addressing antimicrobial resistance: A framework for planning, conducting and disseminating antimicrobial resistance intervention research. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2020, 18, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Calvo-Villamañán, A.; San Millán, Á.; Carrilero, L. Tackling AMR from a multidisciplinary perspective: A primer from education and psychology. Int. Microbiol. 2023, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Laxminarayan, R.; Van Boeckel, T.; Frost, I.; Kariuki, S.; Khan, E.A.; Limmathurotsakul, D.; Larsson, D.G.J.; Levy-Hara, G.; Mendelson, M.; Outterson, K.; et al. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years later. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, e51–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. CDC. About Antimicrobial Resistance Investments & Action; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cole, J.; Eskdale, A.; Paul, J.D. Tackling AMR: A Call for a(n Even) More Integrated and Transdisciplinary Approach between Planetary Health and Earth Scientists. Challenges 2022, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Larsson, D.G.J.; Flach, C.-F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. WHO. Antimicrobial Resistance [Fact Sheet]; Wold Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  17. Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Advancing Interprofessional Education and Practice to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance; The Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, Ed.; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, R.; Degnan, K.O.; Luther, V.P.; Szymczak, J.E.; Goren, E.N.; Logan, A.; Shnekendorf, R.; Hamilton, K.W. Development of a Multifaceted Antimicrobial Stewardship Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Education: The Antibiotic Stewardship, Safety, Utilization, Resistance, and Evaluation (ASSURE) Elective. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hayes, J.F. Fighting Back against Antimicrobial Resistance with Comprehensive Policy and Education: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Augie, B.M.; Miot, J.; van Zyl, R.L.; McInerney, P.A. Educational antimicrobial stewardship programs in medical schools: A scoping review. JBI Evid. Synth. 2021, 19, 2906–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luther, V.P.; Ohl, C.A.; Hicks, L.A. Antimicrobial Stewardship Education for Medical Students. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luther, V.P.; Ohl, C. Get Smart About Antibiotics: An Antibiotic Stewardship Curriculum; Wake Forest University School of Medicine: Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Espinosa-Gongora, C.; Jessen, L.R.; Dyar, O.J.; Bousquet-Melou, A.; González-Zorn, B.; Pulcini, C.; Re, G.; Schwarz, S.; Timofte, D.; Toutain, P.L.; et al. Towards a Better and Harmonized Education in Antimicrobial Stewardship in European Veterinary Curricula. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Granick, J.L.; Fellman, C.L.; DeStefano, I.M.; Diaz-Campos, D.; Janovyak, E.; Beaudoin, A.L.; Bollig, E.R. A survey of US and Caribbean veterinary schools reveals strengths and opportunities in antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control activities. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2024, 262, 1485–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goldman, M.; Vaidyam, A.; Parupalli, S.; Rosencranz, H.; Ramkumar, D.; Ramkumar, J. Food Systems and Planetary Health Nexus Elective: A Novel Approach to A Medical Education Imperative for the 21st Century. Challenges 2024, 15, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cozim-Melges, F.; Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Veen, G.F.; Oggiano, P.; Bianchi, F.J.; Van Der Putten, W.H.; Van Zanten, H.H. Farming practices to enhance biodiversity across biomes: A systematic review. NPJ Biodivers. 2024, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Struik, P.C.; Kuyper, T.W. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: The richer shade of green. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 37, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, B.B.; Chappell, M.J.; Vandermeer, J.; Smith, G.; Quintero, E.; Bezner-Kerr, R.; Griffith, D.M.; Ketcham, S.; Latta, S.C.; McMichael, P. Effects of industrial agriculture on climate change and the mitigation potential of small-scale agro-ecological farms. Cabi Rev. 2011, 6, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raven, P.H.; Wagner, D.L. Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2002548117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blum, W.E.H.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Keiblinger, K.M. Does Soil Contribute to the Human Gut Microbiome? Microorganisms 2019, 7, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miller, S.A.; Ferreira, J.P.; LeJeune, J.T. Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Plant Agriculture: A One Health Perspective. Agriculture 2022, 12, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, T.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Liu, K. Cropping systems in agriculture and their impact on soil health—A review. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: Disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Banerjee, S.; van der Heijden, M.G.A. Soil microbiomes and one health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 6–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bar-On, Y.M.; Phillips, R.; Milo, R. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6506–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hayat, R.; Ali, S.; Amara, U.; Khalid, R.; Ahmed, I. Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: A review. Ann. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 579–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lyu, D.; Msimbira, L.A.; Nazari, M.; Antar, M.; Pagé, A.; Shah, A.; Monjezi, N.; Zajonc, J.; Tanney, C.A.S.; Backer, R.; et al. The Coevolution of Plants and Microbes Underpins Sustainable Agriculture. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiao, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Chen, W.; Lu, Y. Dominant role of abundant rather than rare bacterial taxa in maintaining agro-soil microbiomes under environmental disturbances. Chemosphere 2019, 235, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Riesenfeld, C.S.; Goodman, R.M.; Handelsman, J. Uncultured soil bacteria are a reservoir of new antibiotic resistance genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Springael, D.; Top, E.M. Horizontal gene transfer and microbial adaptation to xenobiotics: New types of mobile genetic elements and lessons from ecological studies. TRENDS Microbiol. 2004, 12, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cerqueira, F.; Matamoros, V.; Bayona, J.M.; Berendonk, T.U.; Elsinga, G.; Hornstra, L.M.; Piña, B. Antibiotic resistance gene distribution in agricultural fields and crops. A soil-to-food analysis. Environ. Res. 2019, 177, 108608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Despotovic, M.; de Nies, L.; Busi, S.B.; Wilmes, P. Reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance in the context of One Health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 73, 102291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kaviani Rad, A.; Astaykina, A.; Streletskii, R.; Afsharyzad, Y.; Etesami, H.; Zarei, M.; Balasundram, S.K. An Overview of Antibiotic Resistance and Abiotic Stresses Affecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Agricultural Soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kelbrick, M.; Hesse, E.; O’Brien, S. Cultivating antimicrobial resistance: How intensive agriculture ploughs the way for antibiotic resistance. Microbiology 2023, 169, 001384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Y.; Song, D.; Liang, S.; Dang, P.; Qin, X.; Liao, Y.; Siddique, K.H.M. Effect of no-tillage on soil bacterial and fungal community diversity: A meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 204, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsiafouli, M.A.; Thébault, E.; Sgardelis, S.P.; de Ruiter, P.C.; van der Putten, W.H.; Birkhofer, K.; Hemerik, L.; de Vries, F.T.; Bardgett, R.D.; Brady, M.V.; et al. Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 2015, 21, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barros-Rodríguez, A.; Rangseekaew, P.; Lasudee, K.; Pathom-Aree, W.; Manzanera, M. Impacts of Agriculture on the Environment and Soil Microbial Biodiversity. Plants 2021, 10, 2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Klümper, U.; Gionchetta, G.; Catão, E.; Bellanger, X.; Dielacher, I.; Elena, A.X.; Fang, P.; Galazka, S.; Goryluk-Salmonowicz, A.; Kneis, D.; et al. Environmental microbiome diversity and stability is a barrier to antimicrobial resistance gene accumulation. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Patel, S.J.; Wellington, M.; Shah, R.M.; Ferreira, M.J. Antibiotic Stewardship in Food-producing Animals: Challenges, Progress, and Opportunities. Clin. Ther. 2020, 42, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mann, A.; Nehra, K.; Rana, J.S.; Dahiya, T. Antibiotic resistance in agriculture: Perspectives on upcoming strategies to overcome upsurge in resistance. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. US Food and Drug Administration (Ed.) FDA Releases Annual Summary Report on Antimicrobials Sold or Distributed in 2022 for Use in Food-Producing Animals; US FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  52. World Health Organization (Ed.) WHO’s List of Medically Important Antimicrobials: A Risk Management Tool for Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance Due to Non-Human Use; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  53. US Food and Drug Administration (Ed.) FDA Announces Transition of Over-the-Counter Medically Important Antimicrobials for Animals to Prescription Status; U.S. Food & Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  54. Manyi-Loh, C.; Mamphweli, S.; Meyer, E.; Okoh, A. Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and Its Consequential Resistance in Environmental Sources: Potential Public Health Implications. Molecules 2018, 23, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mulchandani, R.; Wang, Y.; Gilbert, M.; Van Boeckel, T.P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food-producing animals: 2020 to 2030. PLoS Glob. Public Health 2023, 3, e0001305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sharma, A.; Shukla, A.; Attri, K.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Suttee, A.; Singh, G.; Barnwal, R.P.; Singla, N. Global trends in pesticides: A looming threat and viable alternatives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Onwona-Kwakye, M.; Plants-Paris, K.; Keita, K.; Lee, J.; Brink, P.; Hogarh, J.N.; Darkoh, C. Pesticides Decrease Bacterial Diversity and Abundance of Irrigated Rice Fields. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Walder, F.; Schmid, M.W.; Riedo, J.; Valzano-Held, A.Y.; Banerjee, S.; Büchi, L.; Bucheli, T.D.; van der Heijden, M.G.A. Soil microbiome signatures are associated with pesticide residues in arable landscapes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 174, 108830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qiu, D.; Ke, M.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Lu, T.; Sun, L.; Qian, H. Response of microbial antibiotic resistance to pesticides: An emerging health threat. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 850, 158057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kurenbach, B.; Marjoshi, D.; Amábile-Cuevas, C.F.; Ferguson, G.C.; Godsoe, W.; Gibson, P.; Heinemann, J.A. Sublethal exposure to commercial formulations of the herbicides dicamba, 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and glyphosate cause changes in antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. mBio 2015, 6, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Chen, Q.-L.; An, X.-L.; Zheng, B.-X.; Gillings, M.; Peñuelas, J.; Cui, L.; Su, J.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-G. Loss of soil microbial diversity exacerbates spread of antibiotic resistance. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2019, 1, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Roslund, M.I.; Laitinen, O.H.; Sinkkonen, A. Scoping review on soil microbiome and gut health—Are soil microorganisms missing from the planetary health plate? People Nat. 2024, 6, 1078–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peltoniemi, K.; Velmala, S.; Fritze, H.; Lemola, R.; Pennanen, T. Long-term impacts of organic and conventional farming on the soil microbiome in boreal arable soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2021, 104, 103314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fess, T.L.; Benedito, V.A. Organic versus conventional cropping sustainability: A comparative system analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Montgomery, D.R.; Biklé, A.; Archuleta, R.; Brown, P.; Jordan, J. Soil health and nutrient density: Preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ramkumar, D.; Marty, A.; Ramkumar, J.; Rosencranz, H.; Vedantham, R.; Goldman, M.; Meyer, E.; Steinmetz, J.; Weckle, A.; Bloedorn, K.; et al. Food for thought: Making the case for food produced via regenerative agriculture in the battle against non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs). One Health 2024, 18, 100734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vandevijvere, S.; Pedroni, C.; De Ridder, K.; Castetbon, K. The Cost of Diets According to Their Caloric Share of Ultraprocessed and Minimally Processed Foods in Belgium. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Azzam, A. Is the world converging to a ‘Western diet’? Public Health Nutr. 2021, 24, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kirchhelle, C. Pharming animals: A global history of antibiotics in food production (1935–2017). Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wallinga, D.; Smit, L.A.M.; Davis, M.F.; Casey, J.A.; Nachman, K.E. A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2022, 9, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cazer, C.L.; Eldermire, E.R.B.; Lhermie, G.; Murray, S.A.; Scott, H.M.; Gröhn, Y.T. The effect of tylosin on antimicrobial resistance in beef cattle enteric bacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 176, 104934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Tian, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Clinical Impact of Colistin Banning in Food Animal on mcr-1-Positive Enterobacteriaceae in Patients From Beijing, China, 2009–2019: A Long-Term Longitudinal Observational Study. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 826624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, R.; van Dorp, L.; Shaw, L.P.; Bradley, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Jin, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Rieux, A.; et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Umair, M.; Hassan, B.; Farzana, R.; Ali, Q.; Sands, K.; Mathias, J.; Afegbua, S.; Haque, M.N.; Walsh, T.R.; Mohsin, M. International manufacturing and trade in colistin, its implications in colistin resistance and One Health global policies: A microbiological, economic, and anthropological study. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e264–e276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fenollar, A.; Doménech, E.; Ferrús, M.A.; Jiménez-Belenguer, A. Risk Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria Isolated from Backyard, Organic, and Regular Commercial Eggs. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. de Alcântara Rodrigues, I.; Ferrari, R.G.; Panzenhagen, P.H.N.; Mano, S.B.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Chapter Four—Antimicrobial resistance genes in bacteria from animal-based foods. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Gadd, G.M., Sariaslani, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; Volume 112, pp. 143–183. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hassani, S.; Moosavy, M.-H.; Gharajalar, S.N.; Khatibi, S.A.; Hajibemani, A.; Barabadi, Z. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic foodborne bacteria isolated from bovine milk. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Menegat, S.; Ledo, A.; Tirado, R. Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Prado, J.; Ribeiro, H.; Alvarenga, P.; Fangueiro, D. A step towards the production of manure-based fertilizers: Disclosing the effects of animal species and slurry treatment on their nutrients content and availability. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 337, 130369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gillings, M.R.; Gaze, W.H.; Pruden, A.; Smalla, K.; Tiedje, J.M.; Zhu, Y.-G. Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1269–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sanz, C.; Casado, M.; Navarro-Martin, L.; Cañameras, N.; Carazo, N.; Matamoros, V.; Bayona, J.M.; Piña, B. Implications of the use of organic fertilizers for antibiotic resistance gene distribution in agricultural soils and fresh food products. A plot-scale study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 815, 151973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cycoń, M.; Mrozik, A.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. Antibiotics in the Soil Environment-Degradation and Their Impact on Microbial Activity and Diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Peng, S.; Zheng, H.; Herrero-Fresno, A.; Olsen, J.E.; Dalsgaard, A.; Ding, Z. Co-occurrence of antimicrobial and metal resistance genes in pig feces and agricultural fields fertilized with slurry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Blot, K.; Hammami, N.; Blot, S.; Vogelaers, D.; Lambert, M.-L. Seasonal variation of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: A national cohort study. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2022, 43, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kito, Y.; Kuwabara, K.; Ono, K.; Kato, K.; Yokoi, T.; Horiguchi, K.; Kato, K.; Hirose, M.; Ohara, T.; Goto, K.; et al. Seasonal variation in the prevalence of Gram-negative bacilli in sputum and urine specimens from outpatients and inpatients. Fujita Med. J. 2022, 8, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. van der Wiel, K.; Bintanja, R. Contribution of climatic changes in mean and variability to monthly temperature and precipitation extremes. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kumar, L.; Chhogyel, N.; Gopalakrishnan, T.; Hasan, M.K.; Jayasinghe, S.L.; Kariyawasam, C.S.; Kogo, B.K.; Ratnayake, S. Chapter 4—Climate change and future of agri-food production. In Future Foods; Bhat, R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 49–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. MacFadden, D.R.; McGough, S.F.; Fisman, D.; Santillana, M.; Brownstein, J.S. Antibiotic resistance increases with local temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, W.; Liu, C.; Ho, H.C.; Shi, L.; Zeng, Y.; Yang, X.; Huang, Q.; Pei, Y.; Huang, C.; Yang, L. Association between antibiotic resistance and increasing ambient temperature in China: An ecological study with nationwide panel data. Lancet Reg. Health–West. Pac. 2023, 30, 100628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zeng, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, M.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Yang, X.; Xia, H.; Yang, S.; Yang, L. The association between ambient temperature and antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae in China: A difference-in-differences analysis. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1158762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Guerra, C.A.; Cano-Díaz, C.; Egidi, E.; Wang, J.-T.; Eisenhauer, N.; Singh, B.K.; Maestre, F.T. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale. Nat. Clim. Change 2020, 10, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Semenza, J.C.; Ko, A.I. Waterborne Diseases That Are Sensitive to Climate Variability and Climate Change. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 389, 2175–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chua, P.L.C.; Ng, C.F.S.; Tobias, A.; Seposo, X.T.; Hashizume, M. Associations between ambient temperature and enteric infections by pathogen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2022, 6, e202–e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cruz-Loya, M.; Tekin, E.; Kang, T.M.; Cardona, N.; Lozano-Huntelman, N.; Rodriguez-Verdugo, A.; Savage, V.M.; Yeh, P.J. Antibiotics Shift the Temperature Response Curve of Escherichia coli Growth. mSystems 2021, 6, e0022821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Burnham, J.P. Climate change and antibiotic resistance: A deadly combination. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, 2049936121991374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ebi, K.L.; Vanos, J.; Baldwin, J.W.; Bell, J.E.; Hondula, D.M.; Errett, N.A.; Hayes, K.; Reid, C.E.; Saha, S.; Spector, J.; et al. Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Population Health and Health System Implications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2021, 42, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lynch, V.D.; Shaman, J. Waterborne Infectious Diseases Associated with Exposure to Tropical Cyclonic Storms, United States, 1996–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023, 29, 1548–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yang, S.-H.; Chen, C.-H.; Chu, K.-H. Fecal indicators, pathogens, antibiotic resistance genes, and ecotoxicity in Galveston Bay after Hurricane Harvey. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 124953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pérez-Valdespino, A.; Pircher, R.; Pérez-Domínguez, C.Y.; Mendoza-Sanchez, I. Impact of flooding on urban soils: Changes in antibiotic resistance and bacterial community after Hurricane Harvey. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 142643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mora, C.; McKenzie, T.; Gaw, I.M.; Dean, J.M.; von Hammerstein, H.; Knudson, T.A.; Setter, R.O.; Smith, C.Z.; Webster, K.M.; Patz, J.A.; et al. Over half of known human pathogenic diseases can be aggravated by climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang 2022, 12, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Brumfield Kyle, D.; Usmani, M.; Santiago, S.; Singh, K.; Gangwar, M.; Hasan Nur, A.; Netherland, M.; Deliz, K.; Angelini, C.; Beatty Norman, L.; et al. Genomic diversity of Vibrio spp. and metagenomic analysis of pathogens in Florida Gulf coastal waters following Hurricane Ian. mBio 2023, 14, e01476-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ngcamu, B.S. Climate change effects on vulnerable populations in the Global South: A systematic review. Nat. Hazards 2023, 118, 977–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schmitt, J.; Offermann, F.; Söder, M.; Frühauf, C.; Finger, R. Extreme weather events cause significant crop yield losses at the farm level in German agriculture. Food Policy 2022, 112, 102359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. IPCC. Food, Fibre, and Other Ecosystem Products. In Climate Change 2022—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 713–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hasegawa, T.; Wakatsuki, H.; Ju, H.; Vyas, S.; Nelson, G.C.; Farrell, A.; Deryng, D.; Meza, F.; Makowski, D. A global dataset for the projected impacts of climate change on four major crops. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, H.-C.; Hsiao, Y.-H.; Chang, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-M.; Lin, L.-Y. Agriculture Adaptation Options for Flood Impacts under Climate Change—A Simulation Analysis in the Dajia River Basin. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. UN. World Population Prospects 2022; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Ed.; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ortiz, A.M.D.; Outhwaite, C.L.; Dalin, C.; Newbold, T. A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: Research and policy priorities. One Earth 2021, 4, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bassitta, R.; Nottensteiner, A.; Bauer, J.; Straubinger, R.K.; Hölzel, C.S. Spread of antimicrobial resistance genes via pig manure from organic and conventional farms in the presence or absence of antibiotic use. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 2457–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ager, E.O.; Carvalho, T.; Silva, E.M.; Ricke, S.C.; Hite, J.L. Global trends in antimicrobial resistance on organic and conventional farms. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Quandt, A.; Neufeldt, H.; Gorman, K. Climate change adaptation through agroforestry: Opportunities and gaps. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2023, 60, 101244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Huss, C.P.; Holmes, K.D.; Blubaugh, C.K. Benefits and Risks of Intercropping for Crop Resilience and Pest Management. J. Econ. Entomol. 2022, 115, 1350–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Beule, L.; Vaupel, A.; Moran-Rodas, V.E. Abundance, Diversity, and Function of Soil Microorganisms in Temperate Alley-Cropping Agroforestry Systems: A Review. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ghale, B.; Mitra, E.; Sodhi, H.S.; Verma, A.K.; Kumar, S. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems and Its Potential in Climate Change Mitigation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Amorim, H.C.S.; Ashworth, A.J.; O’Brien, P.L.; Thomas, A.L.; Runkle, B.R.K.; Philipp, D. Temperate silvopastures provide greater ecosystem services than conventional pasture systems. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. WHO. Guidance on wastewater and solid waste management for manufacturing of antibiotics. In UN Environment Program; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wang, K.; Zhuang, T.; Su, Z.; Chi, M.; Wang, H. Antibiotic residues in wastewaters from sewage treatment plants and pharmaceutical industries: Occurrence, removal and environmental impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 788, 147811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. de Ilurdoz, M.S.; Sadhwani, J.J.; Reboso, J.V. Antibiotic removal processes from water & wastewater for the protection of the aquatic environment—A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 45, 102474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in soil microbiota. Chemical inputs, including pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, exert stresses on bacteria, alter the composition of the bacterial community, and select for resistance to other antimicrobials, including those used in medicine. Animal manures contain resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that further alter the soil microbiome. ARGs can spread through the bacterial community via horizontal gene transfer. Figure generated using BioRender.com. (biorender.com. accessed on 10 April 2025).
Figure 1. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in soil microbiota. Chemical inputs, including pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, exert stresses on bacteria, alter the composition of the bacterial community, and select for resistance to other antimicrobials, including those used in medicine. Animal manures contain resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that further alter the soil microbiome. ARGs can spread through the bacterial community via horizontal gene transfer. Figure generated using BioRender.com. (biorender.com. accessed on 10 April 2025).
Challenges 16 00022 g001
Figure 2. Alteration of animal microbiota by antimicrobial drugs and spread into the environment and food via use of manures as fertilizers. Antimicrobial drugs exert selective pressures that drive antimicrobial resistance in animal microbiota, leading to the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). These resistant bacteria, antibiotic residues, and ARGs persist in manures, which are then used as fertilizers. These can then alter soil microbiota and spread throughout waterways via runoff. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Alteration of animal microbiota by antimicrobial drugs and spread into the environment and food via use of manures as fertilizers. Antimicrobial drugs exert selective pressures that drive antimicrobial resistance in animal microbiota, leading to the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). These resistant bacteria, antibiotic residues, and ARGs persist in manures, which are then used as fertilizers. These can then alter soil microbiota and spread throughout waterways via runoff. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Challenges 16 00022 g002
Figure 3. Transmission of resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from livestock to humans through plant and animal foods. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Figure 3. Transmission of resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from livestock to humans through plant and animal foods. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Challenges 16 00022 g003
Figure 4. Effects of global climate change on agricultural production and antimicrobial resistance. High temperatures and altered weather patterns change growing seasons and harm yields, particularly monoculture crops. Heavy precipitation events cause flooding, which compromises agricultural production. Flooding and higher temperatures facilitate the spread of resistant bacteria and their genes through waterways and promote their proliferation. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Figure 4. Effects of global climate change on agricultural production and antimicrobial resistance. High temperatures and altered weather patterns change growing seasons and harm yields, particularly monoculture crops. Heavy precipitation events cause flooding, which compromises agricultural production. Flooding and higher temperatures facilitate the spread of resistant bacteria and their genes through waterways and promote their proliferation. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Challenges 16 00022 g004
Figure 5. A scheme depicting major anthropogenic drivers of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and acquisition of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in agriculture and healthcare. The scheme illustrates routes of transmission through food and the environment. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Figure 5. A scheme depicting major anthropogenic drivers of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and acquisition of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in agriculture and healthcare. The scheme illustrates routes of transmission through food and the environment. Figure generated using BioRender.com.
Challenges 16 00022 g005
Figure 6. Regenerative agricultural practices introduce biodiversity through polyculture and do not rely on chemical and antimicrobial inputs and thus do not exert the same pressures driving antimicrobial resistance. Planting of permaculture, groundcover, and trees in the practice of agroforestry enhances biodiversity while providing enhanced resilience to extreme weather and pests. These practices promote soil health and do not involve extensive tillage of soils. Incorporation of livestock in agroforestry in the practice of silvopasture reduces the need for antimicrobials and the accumulation of animal wastes. These forms of agriculture collectively improve the health of soils. Image generated using BioRender.com. (BioRender: Scientific Image and Illustration Software) (https://www.biorender.com/ accessed on 10 April 2025).
Figure 6. Regenerative agricultural practices introduce biodiversity through polyculture and do not rely on chemical and antimicrobial inputs and thus do not exert the same pressures driving antimicrobial resistance. Planting of permaculture, groundcover, and trees in the practice of agroforestry enhances biodiversity while providing enhanced resilience to extreme weather and pests. These practices promote soil health and do not involve extensive tillage of soils. Incorporation of livestock in agroforestry in the practice of silvopasture reduces the need for antimicrobials and the accumulation of animal wastes. These forms of agriculture collectively improve the health of soils. Image generated using BioRender.com. (BioRender: Scientific Image and Illustration Software) (https://www.biorender.com/ accessed on 10 April 2025).
Challenges 16 00022 g006
Figure 7. Solutions to antimicrobial resistance require efforts and communication among multiple stakeholders worldwide. Images generated using BioRender.com. (BioRender: Scientific Image and Illustration Software) (https://www.biorender.com/ accessed on 10 April 2025).
Figure 7. Solutions to antimicrobial resistance require efforts and communication among multiple stakeholders worldwide. Images generated using BioRender.com. (BioRender: Scientific Image and Illustration Software) (https://www.biorender.com/ accessed on 10 April 2025).
Challenges 16 00022 g007
Table 1. Antibiotics used in livestock production and their corresponding antibiotic classes used therapeutically in human medicine. Adapted from Revenge of the Microbes [5].
Table 1. Antibiotics used in livestock production and their corresponding antibiotic classes used therapeutically in human medicine. Adapted from Revenge of the Microbes [5].
Antibiotic Used in LivestockMedically Important Antibiotics That It Selects for Resistance toUse in Human Medicine
TylosinMacrolidesPostsurgical infections, sexually transmitted infections, bacterial upper respiratory infections, bacterial pneumonia
Quinupristin/dalfopristin combination therapyMultidrug-resistant bacterial infections, postsurgical infection, systemic bacterial infections
OxytetracyclineTetracyclinesBacterial pneumonia, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Lyme disease, intracellular bacterial infections
SulfamethazineSulfonamidesUrinary tract infections, otitis media, used in combination with trimethoprim and as monotherapy
EnrofloxacinFluoroquinolonesUrinary tract infections, bacterial enteric infections, sexually transmitted infections, bacterial pneumonia
AvoparcinVancomycinPostsurgical infections, systemic bacterial infections, bacterial pneumonia, bacterial endocarditis
ColistinColistin, polymyxin EMultidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, bacterial pneumonia, bacterial meningitis
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graham, M.E.; Wilson, B.A.; Ramkumar, D.; Rosencranz, H.; Ramkumar, J. Unseen Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in This Global Health Crisis. Challenges 2025, 16, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16020022

AMA Style

Graham ME, Wilson BA, Ramkumar D, Rosencranz H, Ramkumar J. Unseen Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in This Global Health Crisis. Challenges. 2025; 16(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16020022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graham, Madeline E., Brenda A. Wilson, Davendra Ramkumar, Holly Rosencranz, and Japhia Ramkumar. 2025. "Unseen Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in This Global Health Crisis" Challenges 16, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16020022

APA Style

Graham, M. E., Wilson, B. A., Ramkumar, D., Rosencranz, H., & Ramkumar, J. (2025). Unseen Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance: The Role of Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in This Global Health Crisis. Challenges, 16(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe16020022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop