Flaws and Drawbacks in Present Regulation and the Need to Take Action and Support the Renewable Energies Policies in Italy
Four Reasons to Support the Extension of Licenses for Exploitation of Natural Gas
- The principal is that the extraction activities are important in terms of employment levels, as well as for the royalties that public administrations, at various levels, get from oil companies thanks to their activity on the national territory.Among the concessions that will come to an end in the comingyears, many have already requested an extension under the old legislation, and will get it. Some of them have not asked for an extension due to a closure of their activities. It has been estimated that around 26% of natural gas production, and 9% ofoil production, will be closed progressively between 2017 and 2027.At the date when the drilling activity on the presently productive deposits will come to anend, around 2020, it has been calculated that 3500 workers or more will have been madeunemployed. Some reports talk of about 10,000 workers in total, but someof them will be employed in other activities. Therefore, these unemployed workers will cost the community as much as 105 million euro/year, in addition to costs for formation and re-employment, or for pension costs.If the Italian government and majority of representatives would have taken action to reduce the high costs of the national debt interests, a new cost due to unemployed workers would have been better accepted. Then, a new tax will have been raised to pay this additional cost to the community. The present economy balance is still not sustainable.
- It is not easy to make an estimate of money loss for the community (taxation ofthe oil activities, royalties). Nomisma, a research study organization, with the participation of banks and Italian industries, has calculated an overall economic gain from the hydrocarbon extraction sector of about one billion euro/year in the period 2000–2010. A victory of the “Yes” vote at the referendumwill translate in a loss of about 170 million euro/year.
- It has been reported thatsome negative impacts on the environment (chemical pollution) will be caused by random monitoring activity made by ISPRA Institute. However, where platforms on sites are already exhausted, no pollution is present, and the marine parks around the area are enriched in fishes (nursery), since fishing boats need to stay at a distance of 1 km from the platforms. Therefore, no harm is foreseen to the marine life. Where drilling operations are still present, a possibility for pollution is envisaged as a potential risk, but contingency plans are in force for a containment of the chemicals. Around the drilling platforms, mussel fishing is abundant: mussels have grown in the areaduring their life cycle due to the spatial residence on the site.Healthy mussels at these sights are larger than thoseatany other aquaculture site.
- Finally, since the oil released from oil ships presents a much higher threat to the seas, the vote for “No extension to drilling licenses” will result in an increase in transport of oil and natural gas by sea, which willincrease imports to sustain the demand for fossil fuels in the immediate period.Environmental protection agencies should take into consideration the competitiveness of Italy’sneighbor states, such as Croatia. In 2016, their Ministry for Economy approved new rules for the exploitation of Adriatic sea deposits of fossil fuels. Ten licenses are operative for drilling activities offshore. The plan has attracted six oil companies, Marathon Oil, OMV, ENI, MedOilGas and INA, for an extension of 15 areas. Licenses for exploration are valid for 5 years. Croatia hopesthat Adriatic sea fossil fuels will bring revenues of2.5 billion dollars in the next five years.Therefore, we will not be able to control the environment of the coasts, since neighbor states are so flexible in releasing licenses for exploitation of fossil fuels by offshore drilling.
Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ministry of Economic Development Directorate-General for Mineral and Energy Resources. DGRME Annual Report 2015. Available online: http://unmig.mise.gov.it/unmig/stat/ra2015/eng/ra2015eng.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2016).
- Poltronieri, P.; D’Urso, O.F. Biotransformation of agricultural waste and byproducts. In The Food, Feed, Fibre, Fuel (4F) Economy; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
© 2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mezzolla, V. Flaws and Drawbacks in Present Regulation and the Need to Take Action and Support the Renewable Energies Policies in Italy. Challenges 2016, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe7010010
Mezzolla V. Flaws and Drawbacks in Present Regulation and the Need to Take Action and Support the Renewable Energies Policies in Italy. Challenges. 2016; 7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe7010010
Chicago/Turabian StyleMezzolla, Valeria. 2016. "Flaws and Drawbacks in Present Regulation and the Need to Take Action and Support the Renewable Energies Policies in Italy" Challenges 7, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe7010010
APA StyleMezzolla, V. (2016). Flaws and Drawbacks in Present Regulation and the Need to Take Action and Support the Renewable Energies Policies in Italy. Challenges, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe7010010