Mathematical and Computer Modeling as a Novel Approach for the Accelerated Development of New Inhalation and Intranasal Drug Delivery Systems

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The content of review article nicely presented.  However a good review article should comprise of Figures and Tables. More heading should be added. 

My recommendation is to includes more Figures and Tables. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

see file attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors submit a review paper on "Modeling as a Novel Approach for Accelerated Development of New Drug Delivery Systems for Treating Socially
Significant Diseases".

Review papers contribute to the literature as the significant studies are compiled, summarized, and critically evaluated and their impact is analysed. In the submitted paper, the authors list existing papers in the literature, well known CFD methods are summarized. However, there are no real results or conclusions from the literature. What were the findings in the included studies? Why they are important? Also, tables or figures can explain the findings better. Otherwise, the papers in the submitted review can be found using Google search. Therefore, the contribution of the submitted study remains unclear.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have revised the manuscript as per the reviewer suggestion. 

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have improved their paper that is now suitable for publication

No particular issue found

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors revise the submitted paper sufficiently. It can be accepted as a publication.

Sufficient