Next Article in Journal
How Thermal Aging Affects Ignition and Combustion Properties of Reactive Al/CuO Nanolaminates: A Joint Theoretical/Experimental Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Performance of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2: Surface-Structure Dependence and Silver-Deposition Effect
Previous Article in Journal
EMI Shielding of the Hydrophobic, Flexible, Lightweight Carbonless Nano-Plate Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
A β-cyclodextrin Modified Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Au Co-Catalyst for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis

1
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
2
Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University), Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
3
College of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(10), 2088; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102088
Submission received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 20 October 2020 / Published: 21 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano‐Photocatalytic Materials: Possibilities and Challenges)

Abstract

:
The urban environment is facing serious problems caused by automobile exhaust pollution, which has led to a great impact on human health and climate, and aroused widespread concern of the government and the public. Nano titanium dioxide (TiO2), as a photocatalyst, can be activated by ultraviolet irradiation and then form a strong REDOX potential on the surface of the nano TiO2 particles. The REDOX potential can degrade the automobile exhaust, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and hydrocarbons (HC). In this paper, a photocatalytic environmentally friendly pervious concrete (PEFPC) was manufactured by spraying nano TiO2 on the surface of it and the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC was researched. The nano TiO2 particle size, TiO2 dosage, TiO2 spraying amount, and dispersant dosage were selected as factors to investigate the efficiency of photocatalytic degradation of automobile exhaust by PEFPC. Moreover, the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) was used to evaluate the distribution of nano TiO2 on the surface of the pervious concrete, the distribution area of nano TiO2 was obtained through Image-Pro Plus, and the area ratio of nano TiO2 to the surface of the pervious concrete was calculated. The results showed that the recommended nano TiO2 particle size is 25 nm. The optimum TiO2 dosage was 10% and the optimum dispersant dosage was 5.0%. The photocatalytic performance of PEFPC was best when the TiO2 spraying amount was 333.3 g/m2. The change in the photocatalytic ratio of HC and NOx is consistent with the distribution area of nano TiO2 on the surface of the pervious concrete. In addition, the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC under two light sources (ultraviolet light and sunlight) was compared. The results indicated that both light sources were able to stimulate the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC. The research provided a reference for the evaluation of automobile exhaust removal performance of PEFPC.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, global urbanization and development of the automotive industry have caused many environmental problems while promoting rapid social development [1,2]. Urban air pollution, as the most serious one, has had a great impact on urban environment and human health [3]. Automobile exhaust caused by the increasing number of motor vehicles in the city is the main source of urban air pollution. The main components of automobile exhaust are nitrogen oxides (NOx) and hydrocarbons (HC). Sustainability development, especially environmental sustainability development, has become a key issue of social development and aroused widespread concern of the government and the public [4]. Automobile exhaust leads to air pollution throughout the world. There are many emission reduction methods, such as the encouragement of carpooling and public transportation, but automobile exhaust pollution is still a serious problem all over the world [5].
Nano titanium dioxide (TiO2), characterized by low toxicity, strong optical absorption, and redox ability, and is promising in photocatalytic degradation of automobile exhaust [6,7]. Moreover, nano TiO2 has a wide band gap of about 3.2 eV and has significant performance in the ultraviolet light region [8], and automobile exhaust photocatalytic products are harmless to the urban environment [9,10,11]. In recent years, the rapid development of TiO2 photocatalytic technology has prompted the application of photocatalytic pavement materials to improve urban air quality [12,13]. Nano TiO2 is the most extensively used photocatalyst due to its low cost and high chemical stability [14,15]. Pervious concrete is considered to be an environmentally friendly pavement material, which has many environmental benefits, such as improving water quality and reducing soil pollution. The use of pervious concrete meets the requirements of sustainable social development [16]. The incorporation of nano TiO2 into pervious concrete pavement materials imparts photocatalytic performance to pervious concrete [17,18,19]; automobile exhaust nearby pervious concrete pavement can be converted to water and salt under ultraviolet light irradiation and subsequently the salt will be washed away by the rain [20,21].
Nano TiO2 exists in three different crystalline forms: anatase, rutile, and brookite [22]. Anatase TiO2 has an indirect bandgap while rutile has a direct bandgap. The ability of indirect bandgap to inhibit the recombination of the electron and hole is better than that of direct bandgap, which results in anatase TiO2, which is better than rutile TiO2 in photocatalytic activity [23]. It is difficult to produce brookite TiO2 in the laboratory due to its intermediate phase in the anatase to brookite to rutile [24]. Under ultraviolet irradiation, electrons in the valence band are activated and transferred into the conduction band, leaving relatively stable holes on the surface of the valence band, thus forming electron–hole pairs. The electron and hole are captured by imperfection and dangling bond of nano TiO2 and diffuse to the surface of nano TiO2, forming a strong REDOX potential and degrading automobile exhaust into harmless substances. For various reasons, anatase TiO2 is the preferred photocatalyst due to its strong photocatalytic activity, simple preparation and the absence of toxicity [18,23].
In recent years, many experiments have been performed under different experimental conditions in order to evaluate the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 and promote the application of photocatalytic pavement materials. Some scholars have studied the effects of substrate materials on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2. Xu et al. [25] studied the effect of recycled aggregate on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete. The results showed that the recycled aggregate coated with nano TiO2 significantly improved the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete. Chen et al. [13] used recycled glass to replace sand in preparing the concrete; the effects of glass color, aggregate size, and curing age on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete were investigated. The significant improvement of photocatalytic performance was obtained due to the use of recycled glass in the concrete. Guo et al. [12] evaluated the effects of white cement and ground granulated blast furnace slag on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete. The results showed that the use of white cement and ground granulated blast furnace slag had a positive effect on photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete. Some scholars have studied the effect of environmental factors on photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2. Guo et al. [26] compared the effects of different NO flow rates, initial NO concentrations, ultraviolet light intensities, and relative humidity conditions on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete. Ballari et al. [18] studied the effects of initial NOx concentration, reactor height, and flow rate on the photocatalytic performance of nano TiO2 concrete and proposed the corresponding kinetic model. However, research about the photocatalytic degradation of HC is not enough, and even fewer studies were reported on the effect of dispersion of TiO2 on photocatalytic performance.
In this study, in allusion to the problem of excessive automobile exhaust, the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC was evaluated. The TiO2 particle size, TiO2 dosage, TiO2 spraying amount and dispersant dosage were selected as effect factors and the experiment of photocatalytic performance of PEFPC was conducted, and the distribution of nano TiO2 on the surface of PEFPC was evaluated by the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Moreover, the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC under two light sources (ultraviolet light and sunlight) was compared and the application of PEFPC was evaluated. The research outline of the study is shown in Figure 1.

2. Photocatalytic Degradation Mechanism

Ultraviolet light irradiates the surface of nano TiO2, and the photons in the ultraviolet light are captured by nano TiO2. The photons with an energy equal to or greater than the band gap can activate the electrons in the valence band of nano TiO2. The activated electrons jump into the conduction band, thus resulting in the generation of holes in the valence band. The electron–hole pairs may rapidly recombine and release energy, or are captured by the surface of nano TiO2 to form a REDOX potential. The electrons and holes have strong reducibility and strong oxidability, respectively. The holes react with water to form strong oxidizing hydroxyl radicals. The electrons react with oxygen to form superoxide anions, which have strong REDOX properties. NOx is oxidized to nitrate by hydroxyl radicals and superoxide anions. HC is oxidized and reduced to water and carbon dioxide by hydroxyl radicals and superoxide anions [27,28]. It is the basis condition for photocatalytic reaction that nano TiO2 molecules capture a sufficient number and energy of photons. The number of captured photons is related to the contact area of nano TiO2 molecules and ultraviolet light. The contact area was affected by TiO2 particle size, TiO2 dosage, TiO2 spraying amount, and dispersant dosage. The energy of photons is related to the intensity of ultraviolet light. In this study, the effects of contact area of nano TiO2 molecules and ultraviolet light and the intensity of ultraviolet light on the photocatalytic degradation HC and NOx were investigated.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

In all experiments, Type P.O Portland cement (Changchun, China) with strength grade of 42.5 MPa was selected as the cementitious materials. The chemical composition of cement is shown Table 1. The natural aggregate with particle of 4.75–9.5 mm was used as coarse aggregate to prepare pervious concrete. The water reducer used was liquid polycarboxylic acid series superplasticizer with effective content of 22% and water-reducing ratio of 25%. An anatase nano TiO2 obtained from Chengdu Oenris Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) was used as photocatalyst. The particle size of the TiO2 is 10 nm (5–15 nm), 25 nm (20–30 nm), and 50 nm, and its purity is 99%. The sodium hexametaphosphate ((NaPO3)6) obtained from Chengdu Oenris Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) was used as dispersant. The sodium hexametaphosphate is analytically reagent and its purity is 65–70%.
The VDW (Van der Waals’ force) and coulomb force exist in between nano TiO2 particles, which leads to the particles absorbing and aggregating with each other, thus losing the dispersion stability of the particles in the suspension. The aggregated nano TiO2 particles are shown in Figure 2a. Sodium hexametaphosphate can form a stable complex with nano TiO2 molecules. The complex increases the Zeta potential on the surface of the nano TiO2 particles and leads to the increase in the repulsive force between nano TiO2 particles, thus improving the dispersion stability of nano TiO2 particles in the suspension [29]; the nano TiO2 particles after adding dispersant are shown in Figure 2b.

3.2. Preparation of the Photocatalytic Environmentally Friendly Pervious Concrete

The volumetric method was used for the mixture design of pervious concrete according to the Chinese national standard CJJ/T135-2009 [30]. Based on the previous research conducted by our group [31,32], pervious concrete with optimal mixing ratio was used as substrate materials in this paper, the permeability and effective porosity reached above 3.90 mm/s and 14%, respectively, and the compressive strength was 24 MPa. Moreover, pervious concrete specimens were made using the cement paste encapsulating aggregate method and rodding method. The water–binder ratio and porosity were 0.30 and 15%, respectively. The amount of water reducer was 0.5% of the mass of cement. The specimen size was 300 × 300 × 50 mm. All the specimens were demolded after 24 h and placed in standard-cured room with a relative humidity of 95% and a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C for 28 days. Nano TiO2 and sodium hexametaphosphate were dispersed into water to prepare TiO2 coating, and then the TiO2 coating was sprayed on the surface of pervious concrete and tested after natural air drying for 24 h. The dispersant dosage is the mass percentage of nano TiO2. The mixing ratio of photocatalytic coating is shown in Table 2.

3.3. Determination of Light Intensity

Nano TiO2 can be motivated to produce electrons and holes under ultraviolet irradiation. An ultraviolet lamp was used as the experimental light source and the ultraviolet wavelength is 285–297 nm. 17 measurement points on the surface of the specimen were chosen, which are shown in Figure 3a. The ultraviolet lamp and specimen were placed in the middle of the reactor. The ultraviolet irradiance meter was used to measure the ultraviolet irradiation intensity of the measured points at different ultraviolet lamp heights. Just as shown in Figure 3b,c, the ultraviolet lamp was placed directly above the specimen and the distance between the ultraviolet lamp and the center of the specimen was 135 mm, 180 mm, 225 mm, and 270 mm, respectively. The average ultraviolet irradiation intensity at different ultraviolet lamp heights was calculated and the results are shown in Table 3. The ultraviolet irradiation intensity on the hour of the summer solstice was measured, which is shown in Figure 3d. The average ultraviolet irradiation intensity of the day was calculated, and the result is shown in Table 3.

3.4. Photocatalytic Degradation Experiment

The experimental device consisted of three parts: automobile exhaust analysis device, reactor, and automobile exhaust source, as shown in Figure 4a–c. The reactor was completely sealed and had a good air tightness. The size of reactor is 450 × 450 × 500 mm. MQW-50A tail gas analyzer obtained from Zhejiang University Mingquan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) was used to analyze the automobile exhaust components. The measurement range of NOx and HC was 0–5000 ppm and 0–10,000 ppm respectively and the relative measurement error was 4% and 3%, respectively. Both NOx and HC had a resolution of 1 ppm. The experimental procedures are as follows: (1) put the specimen into the bottom middle position of the reactor and adjust the height of the ultraviolet lamp as shown in Figure 4b; (2) connect the automobile exhaust source to the reactor with a rubber hose as shown in Figure 4c; (3) add automobile exhaust into the reactor and turn on the automobile exhaust analysis device for real-time monitoring until the initial concentrations of NOx and HC are reached; (4) cover the reactor with a shading cloth to prevent interference with natural light and then turn on the ultraviolet lamp for the test as shown in Figure 4d. All experiments were performed at ambient temperature and one atmosphere. The concentrations of NOx and HC in the actual traffic jam section are about 15 ppm and 35 ppm, respectively. Therefore, the initial concentrations of NOx and HC in this experiment were set as 80 ppm and 160 ppm, respectively. The reaction time was 60 min, and the NOx and HC concentrations in the reactor were tested every 10 min. The photocatalytic degradation ratios of NOx and HC on the surface of PEFPC are calculated as Equation (1). The photocatalytic degradation rates of NOx and HC on the surface of PEFPC are calculated as Equation (2).
D = G i n t i a l G f i n a l G i n t i a l × 100 %
F = G i n t i a l N G f i n a l N T
where D is the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx and HC (%); Gintial is the initial concentration of NOx and HC (ppm); Gfinal is the final concentration of NOx and HC (ppm); F is the photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx and HC (ppm/min); GintialN is the initial concentration of NOx and HC in the Nth ten minutes (ppm); GfinalN is the final concentration of NOx and HC in the Nth ten min (ppm); T is the reaction time and T = 10 min.

3.5. ESEM

The efficiency of photocatalytic automobile exhaust degradation is related to the contact area of nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light. In this paper, the ESEM was adopted to obtain the microscopic characterization of nano TiO2. 17 points (shown in Figure 5a) on the surface of pervious concrete sample were selected as sampling points, and among them, 3 evenly selected measuring points were chosen for taking pictures. The samples were air-dried and gilded, and it should be noted that the observation surface of the concrete sample should not be damaged during the processing of the sample. The processed sample is shown in Figure 5b.
The processed sample was put into the ESEM observation room, the ESEM equipment is shown in Figure 6a, the sample on the worktable was leveled by silicon wafers or other dry materials to avoid errors caused during imaging. The picture taken by ESEM is shown in Figure 6b.
The Image-Pro Plus (Rockville, MD, USA) was used to process the picture and extract the area value of nano TiO2 in the picture, and the area ratio of nano TiO2 area to the measuring point area was calculated and the average value of 51 measuring points were adopted to characterize the contact area of nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light. The specific calculation is shown in Equation (3).
A r e a   R a t i o = 1 51 A r e a T A r e a m p 51
where Area Ratio is the average value of 51 measuring points to characterize the ratio of nano TiO2 area to the pervious concrete substrate materials; AreaT is the nano TiO2 area of the measuring point; Areamp is the area of measuring point.

4. Results

4.1. The Reaction Conditions for Photocatalytic Degradation

The experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx by PEFPC and plain pervious concrete (PPC) with different light sources are shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the PPC cannot significantly photocatalytic degrade HC and NOx, and only a small amount of HC and NOx were consumed by PEFPC and PPC with dark conditions, while the PEFPC can significantly photocatalytically degrade HC and NOx under the ultraviolet light irradiation condition. It can be concluded that photocatalyst and ultraviolet irradiation are the basic conditions for photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx. Figure 7 shows that the PEFPC can significantly photocatalytically degrade HC and NOx under the sunlight irradiation condition. It indicates that sunlight can stimulate the activity of nano TiO2 on the surface of PEFPC and meet the basic requirements of photocatalytic reaction.

4.2. Effect of Light Source on Photocatalytic Degradation

Ultraviolet irradiation is needed as an elementary condition for the photocatalytic degradation reaction. In this section, the effects of different light sources on photocatalytic degradation of automobile exhaust of PEFPC was studied. The selected light sources are ultraviolet height 135 mm, ultraviolet height 180 mm, ultraviolet height 225 mm, ultraviolet height 270 mm, sunlight, and darkness. The experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC are shown in Figure 8. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC increases when the ultraviolet irradiation intensity increases from 31.8 μW/cm2 to 105.1 μW/cm2. The photocatalytic degradation ratio and rate of HC under ultraviolet light irradiation with a lamp height of 135 mm are similar to that under sunlight irradiation. The photocatalytic degradation ratios and rates of HC of ultraviolet height 180 mm, ultraviolet height 225 mm, and ultraviolet height 270 mm are lower than that of ultraviolet height 135 mm and sunlight.
The experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of NOx are shown in Figure 9. It can be seen that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx increases with the increasing in ultraviolet light irradiation intensity. The photocatalytic degradation ratio and rate of NOx under ultraviolet light irradiation with a lamp height of 135 mm are similar to that under sunlight irradiation. The photocatalytic degradation ratios and rates of NOx of ultraviolet lamp 180 mm, ultraviolet lamp 225 mm, and ultraviolet lamp 270 mm are lower than that of ultraviolet lamp 135 mm and sunlight. The experimental height of ultraviolet lamp in the following experiment is selected as 135 mm for the reason that the experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx under ultraviolet light irradiation with a lamp height of 135 mm is similar to that under sunlight irradiation.

4.3. Effect of TiO2 Particle Size on Photocatalytic Degradation

The experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC by PEFPC with different TiO2 particle sizes are shown in Figure 10. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of 25 nm TiO2 on degrading HC is better than that of 10 nm and 50 nm. The photocatalytic degradation rate of 25 nm TiO2 is higher in the first 30 min and lower in the last 30 min than that of 10 nm and 50 nm, but overall, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of 25 nm is higher than that of 10 nm and 50 nm.
Figure 11 shows the experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of NOx by PEFPC with different TiO2 particle sizes. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of 25 nm TiO2 on degrading NOx is the best, followed by 10 nm and 50 nm. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of PEFPC with three particle sizes reaches over 40% after 60 min. In addition, the average photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx of 25 nm TiO2 is 0.77 ppm/min, 10 nm TiO2 is 0.64 ppm/min and 50 nm TiO2 is 0.59 ppm/min.

4.4. Effect of TiO2 Dosage on Photocatalytic Degradation

The effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of HC is shown in Figure 12. It is found that the TiO2 dosage has a great impact on the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC. When the TiO2 dosage is larger than 10%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC is better. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC increases with the increase of TiO2 dosage (3–10%). When the TiO2 dosage is 10–20%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC changes little, which means that the 10% TiO2 is enough and it can be used as the critical value for photocatalytic degradation of HC. When the TiO2 dosage is 10%, the photocatalytic degradation rate of HC decreases with the increase of reaction time, it indicates that the reaction of photocatalytic degradation of HC mainly occurs in the first 30 min.
Figure 13 shows the effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of NOx. It can be seen that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx is the highest at 10% TiO2 dosage and the photocatalytic degradation ratio reaches 59% at 60 min. When the TiO2 dosage is 15% and 20%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx is similar to that of 10%. The photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx with different TiO2 dosages is relatively stable. When the TiO2 dosage is 10%, the average photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx is highest, and the average rate is 0.77 ppm/min. It is observed that the photocatalytic degradation of automobile exhaust with 10% TiO2 dosage is optimal.

4.5. Effect of TiO2 Spraying Amount on Photocatalytic Degradation

Figure 14 shows the effects of different TiO2 spraying amounts on photocatalytic degradation of HC. Figure 14a shows that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC of PEFPC with 30 g, 40 g, and 50 g TiO2 spraying amounts is the best. Figure 14b shows that the photocatalytic degradation rate of HC in the first 30 min is higher than that in the last 30 min, it indicates that the photocatalytic activity of nano TiO2 on the surface of PEFPC gradually decreases with the increase of reaction time. The reaction of photocatalytic degradation of HC mainly occurs in the first 30 min.
Figure 15 shows the effects of different TiO2 spraying amounts on photocatalytic degradation of NOx. The results show that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of the specimen with 30 g TiO2 spraying amount is the best. It is worth noting that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx of PEFPC increases with the increase of TiO2 spraying amounts, when the TiO2 spraying amounts is greater than 30 g, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx of PEFPC slightly decrease. In addition, comparing the reaction process of photocatalytic degradation of NOx with that of HC, the photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx is higher than that of HC, which means that photocatalytic degradation of NOx by nano TiO2 is more effective than that of HC. Based on the experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx, the optimal TiO2 spraying amount is 30 g (333.3 g/m2).

4.6. Effect of Dispersant Dosage on Photocatalytic Degradation

Figure 16 shows the experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC by different dispersant dosages. The results show that dispersant has a positive effect on photocatalytic degradation of HC. However, excessive dispersant dosage (7.5–10.0%) has a negative effect on photocatalytic degradation of HC. Figure 16a shows that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC increases first and then decreases with the increase of dispersant dosage. Figure 16b shows that the photocatalytic degradation rate of HC gradually decreases with the increase of reaction time. The main stage of degradation of HC occurs in the first 30 min.
Figure 17 shows the effects of different dispersant dosages on photocatalytic degradation of NOx. The results show that dispersant has a great effect on photocatalytic degradation of NOx. It can be observed that the photocatalytic degradation ratio of NOx increases first with the increasing in dispersant dosage (0–5.0%) and then decreases with the increase of dispersant dosage (5.0–10.0%). The photocatalytic degradation rate of NOx is relatively stable, which is different to the degradation of HC. Nano TiO2 keeps good photocatalytic activity throughout the whole experiment. According to the experimental results of photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx, the optimal dispersant dosage is 5.0%.

5. Discussion

5.1. TiO2 Particle Size

The experiment results of photocatalytic degradation reaction and the ESEM by different TiO2 particle size are shown in Figure 18. When the photocatalytic degradation reaction is carried out for 60 min, the degradation ratio of HC and NOx first increases and then decreases with the increasing in particle size, while the area ratio gradually decreases as the increasing in particle size. The increase in the area ratio means that the contact area of nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light increases, which has a positive effect on the photocatalytic reaction. However, when the TiO2 particle size is less than 25 nm, the degradation ratio of HC and NOx increases as the area ratio decreases, which is related to the band gap of nano TiO2. When the particle size of nano TiO2 is less than 10 nm, the band gap becomes larger, it indicates that the stronger photon energy is needed to activate electrons, which has a negative effect on the photocatalytic reaction [33].

5.2. TiO2 Dosage

Figure 19 shows that the experiment results of photocatalytic degradation reaction and the ESEM by different TiO2 dosage. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC and NOx at 60 min increases as the nano TiO2 dosage increases; while the nano TiO2 dosage is 15%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio occurs slight decrease. However, overall, when the nano TiO2 dosage is greater than 10%, the photocatalytic degradation ratio changes little. The area ratio has the same trend as the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC and NOx. It indicates that increasing the nano TiO2 dosage has a positive effect on improving the contact area of nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light. However, excessive nano TiO2 particles, namely the nano TiO2 dosage is greater than 10%, absorb and aggregate with each other due to the VDW and coulomb force exist in the nano TiO2 particles, which results the contact area change little. Therefore, it has little effect on the photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx.

5.3. TiO2 Spraying Amount

The experiment results of photocatalytic degradation reaction and the ESEM by different TiO2 spraying amount are shown in Figure 20. The photocatalytic degradation ratios of HC and NOx at the end of photocatalytic degradation reaction increase first and then decrease with the increase of nano TiO2 spraying amount. The area ratio has the similar trend as the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC and NOx. It indicates that increasing the TiO2 spraying amount has a positive effect on improving the contact area of nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light. However, the excessive TiO2 spraying amount, namely the TiO2 spraying amount is greater than 30 g, leads to the nano TiO2 particles absorbing and aggregating with each other and spraying film affects the nano TiO2 particles absorb ultraviolet light, which results the contact area changes little or even slightly decreases. Therefore, it has slight negative effect on the photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx.

5.4. Dispersant Dosage

Figure 21 shows that the experiment results of photocatalytic degradation reaction and the ESEM by different dispersant dosage. When the photocatalytic degradation reaction lasts for 60 min, the photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC and NOx first increases and then decreases with the increasing in dispersant dosage. The area ratio first increases and then decreases with the increasing in dispersant dosage. The change trend of area ratio is similar to the trend of photocatalytic degradation ratio of HC and NOx. Adding dispersant has a positive effect on the dispersion stability of nano TiO2 in the TiO2 coating, therefore increasing the area ratio of TiO2. However, excessive dispersant affects the dispersion stability of nano TiO2. When the dispersant dosage reaches 10%, the dispersion stability of nano TiO2 is worse than that of coating without dispersant, which has a negative effect on the photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx.

6. Conclusions

The photocatalytic performance of PEFPC sprayed with TiO2 was prepared and studied in the lab. The effects of light source, TiO2 particle size, TiO2 dosage, TiO2 spraying amount, and dispersant dosage on the photocatalytic degradation were analyzed. Moreover, the distribution of nano TiO2 was evaluated by the ESEM. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • Ultraviolet irradiation is needed as an elementary condition for the photocatalytic degradation reaction. The photocatalytic degradation ratio of automobile exhaust increases with the increase of ultraviolet irradiation intensity. The PEFPC can effectively degrade automobile exhaust and significantly improve urban air quality.
  • The recommend nano TiO2 particle size is 25 nm. The most ideal TiO2 dosage and dispersant dosage are 10% and 5.0%, respectively. The optimal TiO2 spraying amount is 333.3 g/m2.
  • The photocatalytic degradation of HC and NOx is different. The photocatalytic degradation of HC can be divided into two stages: rapid stage in the first 30 min and slow stage in the last 30 min. The photocatalytic degradation of NOx is relatively stable.
  • The change in the photocatalytic ratio of PEFPC is consistent with the distribution area of nano TiO2 on the surface of the substrate materials. The contact area between nano TiO2 and ultraviolet light is a key factor affecting the photocatalytic performance of PEFPC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L.; methodology, W.L., G.L. and X.L.; formal analysis, W.L. and X.L.; investigation, W.L. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (20180201026SF).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions and comments on improving the quality of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shu, Y.J.; Ji, J.; Xu, Y.; Deng, J.G.; Huang, H.B.; He, M.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Wu, M.Y.; Liu, S.W.; Liu, S.L.; et al. Promotional role of Mn doping on catalytic oxidation of VOCs over mesoporous TiO2 under vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 220, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, H.B.; Lu, H.X.; Zhan, Y.J.; Liu, G.Y.; Feng, Q.Y.; Huang, H.L.; Mu, M.Y.; Ye, X.G. VUV photo-oxidation of gaseous benzene combined with ozone-assisted catalytic oxidation: Effect on transition metal catalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ângelo, J.; Andrade, L.; Madeira, L.M.; Mendes, A. An overview of photocatalysis phenomena applied to NOx abatement. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 522–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Čuček, L.; Klemeš, J.J.; Kravanja, Z. A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 34, 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shen, S.H.; Burton, M.; Jobson, B.; Haselbach, L. Pervious concrete with titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst compound for a greener urban road environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nada, A.A.; Rouby, W.M.A.E.; Bekheet, M.F.; Antuch, M.; Weber, M.; Miele, P.; Viter, R.; Roualdes, S.; Millet, P.; Bechelany, M. Highly textured boron/nitrogen co-doped TiO2 with honeycomb structure showing enhanced visible-light photoelectrocatalytic activity. Appl. Sure Sci. 2020, 505, 144419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nada, A.A.; Bekheet, M.F.; Viter, R.; Roualdes, S.; Bechelany, M. BN/GdxTi(1-x)O(4-x)/2 nanofibers for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 251, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koca, M.; Kudas, Z.; Ekinci, D.; Aydoğan, S. Performance improvement of n-TiO2/p-Si heterojunction by forming of n-TiO2/polyphenylene/p-Si anisotype sandwich heterojunction. Mat. Sci. ESEMicon. Proc. 2020, 121, 105436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bianchi, C.L.; Gatto, S.; Piroal, C.; Naldoni, A.; Michele, A.D.; Gerrato, G.; Crocellà, V.; Capucci, V. Photocatalytic degradation of acetone, acetaldehyde and toluene in gas-phase: Comparison between nano and micro-sized TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 146, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fu, P.F.; Zhang, P.Y.; Li, J. Photocatalytic degradation of low concentration formaldehyde and simultaneous elimination of ozone by-product using palladium modified TiO2 films under UV 254+185nm irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 105, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jo, W.K.; Kim, J.T. Application of visible-light photocatalysis with nitrogen-doped or unmodified titanium dioxide for control of indoor-level volatile organic compounds. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, M.Z.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NO removal of concrete surface layers intermixed with TiO2. Build. Environ. 2013, 70, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, J.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide modified concrete materials– Influence of utilizing recycled glass cullets as aggregates. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 3436–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, H.M.; Xie, D.; Chen, Q.; You, C.F. Kinetic modeling for the deactivation of TiO2 during the photocatalytic removal of low concentration SO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shayegan, Z.; Lee, C.S.; Haghighat, F. TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of volatile organic compounds in gas phase –A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 2408–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yahia, A.; Kabagire, K.D. New approach to proportion pervious concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 62, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, W.G.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.S.; Cao, L.; Ye, J.Y. Preparation of titanium dioxide nano particle modified photocatalytic self-cleaning concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 762–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ballari, M.M.; Hunger, M.; Husken, G.; Brouwers, H.J.H. NOx photocatalytic degradation employing concrete pavement containing titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 95, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ballari, M.M.; Yu, Q.L.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Experimental study of the NO and NO2 degradation by photocatalytically active concrete. Catal. Today 2011, 161, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Henderson, M.A. A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2011, 66, 185–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, M.Z.; Ling, T.C.; Poon, C.S. Nano-TiO2-based architectural mortar for NO removal and bacteria inactivation: Influence of coating and weathering conditions. Cement Concrete Comp. 2013, 36, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nolam, N.T.; Seery, M.K.; Pillai, S.C. Spectroscopic Investigation of the Anatase-to-Rutile Transformation of Sol-Gel-Synthesized TiO2 Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 16151–16157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fischer, K.; Gawel, A.; Rosen, D.; Krause, M.; Latif, A.A.; Griebel, J.; Prager, A.; Schulze, A. Low-Temperature Synthesis of Anatase/Rutile/Brookite TiO2 Nanoparticles on a Polymer Membrane for Photocatalysis. Catalysts 2017, 7, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Monai, M.; Montini, T.; Fornasiero, P. Brookite: Nothing New under the Sun ? Catalysts 2017, 7, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xu, Y.D.; Chen, W.; Jin, R.Y.; Shen, J.S.; Smallbone, K.; Yan, C.Y.; Hu, L. Experimental investigation of photocatalytic effects of concrete in air purification adopting entire concrete waste reuse model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 353, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, M.Z.; Ling, T.C.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NOx degradation of concrete surface layers intermixed and spray-coated with nano-TiO2: Influence of experimental factors. Cement. Concr. Comp. 2017, 83, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dalton, J.S.; Janes, P.A.; Jones, N.G.; Nicholson, J.A.; Hallam, K.R.; Allen, G.C. Photocatalytic oxidation of NOx gases using TiO2: A surface spectroscopic approach. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, J.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic construction and building materials: From fundamentals to applications. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 1899–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Y.; Zhao, J.Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, K. Preparation and freezing behavior of TiO2 nanoparticle suspensions. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15597–15602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Specifications for Pervious Concrete Pavement; Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2009. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, H.B.; Luo, G.B.; Wei, H.B.; Yu, H. Strength, permeability, and freeze-thaw durability of pervious concrete with different aggregate sizes, porosities, and water-binder ratios. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, H.B.; Luo, G.B.; Gong, Y.F.; Wei, H.B. Mechanical properties, permeability, and freeze–thaw resistance of pervious concrete modified by waste crumb rubbers. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kmat, P.V. Photochemistry on Nonreactive and Reactive (ESEMiconductor) Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 267–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research outline.
Figure 1. Research outline.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g001
Figure 2. Nano titanium dioxide (TiO2): (a) before adding dispersant; (b) after adding dispersant.
Figure 2. Nano titanium dioxide (TiO2): (a) before adding dispersant; (b) after adding dispersant.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g002
Figure 3. Ultraviolet irradiation intensity experiment of ultraviolet lamp and sunlight: (a) measuring point diagram; (b) test diagram; (c) ultraviolet intensity test; (d) sunlight intensity test.
Figure 3. Ultraviolet irradiation intensity experiment of ultraviolet lamp and sunlight: (a) measuring point diagram; (b) test diagram; (c) ultraviolet intensity test; (d) sunlight intensity test.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g003
Figure 4. The apparatus of photocatalytic degradation experiment: (a) automobile exhaust analysis device; (b) reactor; (c) test device; (d) test process.
Figure 4. The apparatus of photocatalytic degradation experiment: (a) automobile exhaust analysis device; (b) reactor; (c) test device; (d) test process.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g004
Figure 5. The sampling diagram and processed samples: (a) schematic diagram; (b) processed samples.
Figure 5. The sampling diagram and processed samples: (a) schematic diagram; (b) processed samples.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g005
Figure 6. The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) equipment and sample microscopic picture: (a) ESEM equipment; (b) sample microscopic picture.
Figure 6. The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) equipment and sample microscopic picture: (a) ESEM equipment; (b) sample microscopic picture.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g006
Figure 7. Effect of photocatalyst and light source on photocatalytic degradation of hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx): (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation ratio.
Figure 7. Effect of photocatalyst and light source on photocatalytic degradation of hydrocarbons (HC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx): (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation ratio.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g007
Figure 8. Effect of light source on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Figure 8. Effect of light source on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g008
Figure 9. Effect of light source on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Figure 9. Effect of light source on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g009
Figure 10. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Figure 10. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g010
Figure 11. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Figure 11. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g011
Figure 12. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Figure 12. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g012
Figure 13. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Figure 13. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g013
Figure 14. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Figure 14. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g014
Figure 15. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Figure 15. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g015
Figure 16. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Figure 16. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation of HC: (a) HC degradation ratio; (b) HC degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g016
Figure 17. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Figure 17. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation of NOx: (a) NOx degradation ratio; (b) NOx degradation rate.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g017
Figure 18. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Figure 18. Effect of TiO2 particle size on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g018
Figure 19. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Figure 19. Effect of TiO2 dosage on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g019
Figure 20. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Figure 20. Effect of TiO2 spraying amount on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g020
Figure 21. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Figure 21. Effect of dispersant dosage on photocatalytic degradation and area ratio: (a) HC; (b) NOx.
Nanomaterials 10 02088 g021
Table 1. The chemical composition of cement.
Table 1. The chemical composition of cement.
MaterialChemical Composition (%)
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3
Cement22.605.604.3062.701.702.50
Table 2. Mixing ratio of photocatalytic coating.
Table 2. Mixing ratio of photocatalytic coating.
Mix IDTiO2 Particle Size (nm)TiO2 Dosage (%)TiO2 (g)TiO2 Spraying Amount 1 (g/m2)TiO2 Spraying Amount (g)Dispersant Dosage
(%)
Dispersant (g)
PZ110103.0333.3305.00.150
PZ225103.0333.3305.00.150
PZ350103.0333.3305.00.150
D12530.9333.3305.00.045
D22551.5333.3305.00.075
D325103.0333.3305.00.150
D425154.5333.3305.00.225
D525206.0333.3305.00.300
SD125101.0111.1105.00.050
SD225102.0222.2205.00.100
SD325103.0333.3305.00.150
SD425104.0444.4405.00.200
SD525105.0555.5505.00.250
DD125103.0333.3300 0
DD225103.0333.3302.50.075
DD325103.0333.3305.00.150
DD425103.0333.3307.50.225
DD525103.0333.33010.00.300
LR125103.0333.3305.00.150
LR225103.0333.3305.00.150
LR325103.0333.3305.00.150
LR425103.0333.3305.00.150
Null333.330
1 the surface of area of pervious concrete is 0.09 m2, PZ refers to the TiO2 particle size, D refers to the TiO2 dosage, SD refers to the TiO2 spraying amount, DD refers to the dispersant dosage, LR refers to the light source. Null refers to control group.
Table 3. Ultraviolet irradiation intensity of ultraviolet lamp and sunlight.
Table 3. Ultraviolet irradiation intensity of ultraviolet lamp and sunlight.
Light SourceUV Height 135 mmUV Height 180 mmUV Height 225 mmUV Height 270 mmSunlight
Ultraviolet irradiation intensity (μW/cm2)105.148.431.819.1104.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, G.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Lyu, X. Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102088

AMA Style

Luo G, Liu H, Li W, Lyu X. Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(10):2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Guobao, Hanbing Liu, Wenjun Li, and Xiang Lyu. 2020. "Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis" Nanomaterials 10, no. 10: 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102088

APA Style

Luo, G., Liu, H., Li, W., & Lyu, X. (2020). Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials, 10(10), 2088. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop