Next Article in Journal
Physical Properties and Biofunctionalities of Bioactive Root Canal Sealers In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Triplet Energy Transfer Mechanism of Ternary Organic Hybrid Thin Films of PFO/MEH-PPV/CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots
Previous Article in Journal
Introducing the Novel Mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian Lineshape in the Analysis of the Raman Signal of Biochar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gold Nanoparticle Self-Aggregation on Surface with 1,6-Hexanedithiol Functionalization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/nano10091749
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing

by
Mohsin Ali Badshah
1,*,
Na Yoon Koh
2,
Abdul Wasy Zia
3,
Naseem Abbas
4,
Zahra Zahra
5 and
Muhammad Wajid Saleem
6
1
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
2
Plamica Labs, Batten Hall, 125 Western Ave, Allston, MA 02163, USA
3
Institute of Structural Health Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
4
School of Mechanical Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
5
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
6
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(9), 1749; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091749
Submission received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 27 August 2020 / Accepted: 31 August 2020 / Published: 3 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanophotonics and Its Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) is a unique phenomenon of surface plasmons, where light interacts with the metallic nanostructures and produces electromagnetic fields to enhance the sensitivity of fluorescence-based detection. In particular, this enhancement in sensing capacity is of importance to many research areas, including medical diagnostics, forensic science, and biotechnology. The article covers the basic mechanism of MEF and recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures fabrication for efficient fluorescence signal enhancement that are critically reviewed. The implications of current fluorescence-based technologies for biosensors are summarized, which are in practice to detect different analytes relevant to food control, medical diagnostics, and forensic science. Furthermore, characteristics of existing fabrication methods have been compared on the basis of their resolution, design flexibility, and throughput. The future projections emphasize exploring the potential of non-conventional materials and hybrid fabrication techniques to further enhance the sensitivity of MEF-based biosensors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanostructures were investigated extensively over the past two decades due to numerous characteristics associated with unique phenomena that happen at the nano-size scale [1,2,3]. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) is one of the distinctive phenomena of nanostructures, where light produces strong oscillations of electrons when it interacts with the surfaces or structures of dimensions lower than its wavelength [4]. This unique phenomenon further involves localizing the light within the sub-wavelengths by breaking the light diffraction limit corresponding to dimensional features, which produces a strong localized electromagnetic (EM) field.
Metals have a proven history as materials for fabricating plasmonic nanostructures/nanoparticles with remarkable properties, including enhancement in photothermal/photocatalytic activity, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) [5,6]. Among said applications, enhancement in MEF is an area of particular interest due to its wide-range usability in photonics, medical diagnostics, and nanobiotechnology [7,8,9]. Variations in the type of materials, composition, and geometric design of nanostructures significantly affect the photodegradation resistance, fluorescence intensity, and fluorophores photostability [10,11].
Coinage metals like silver (Ag), gold (Au), and copper (Cu) are common materials used for MEF applications due to their desired characteristics, i.e., high reflection, electron conductivity, suitability, and biocompatibility [10,12,13]. However, many other materials such as aluminium (Al), palladium (Pd), and platinum (Pt), as listed in Table 1, were also investigated over the past decades to enhance MEF [14,15]. Table 1 enlists the plasmonic features and chemical reactivity of each material and refers to relevant investigations for detailed study. Ag and Au are materials widely reported for MEF-based applications due to their broad working range of wavelengths (visible (VIS) to near-infrared (NIR)) and high quality (Q) factor [10,16]. The Q-factor represents the strength of the surface plasmons generated over the material surface, which is a driving factor for enhancing the electromagnetic field and the MEF factor [16]. Therefore, the Q-factor is an essential criterion to determine the potential of a specific material used for MEF applications. Other materials, i.e., Pd and Pt, exhibit the spectral properties in the visible region with low Q-factor and high surface plasmon damping, thus their usability is limited due to their low MEF factor [14,15,16,17].
In addition to the materials and compositions, the MEF characteristics (i.e., intensity and electrons oscillation) critically depend on the shape and size of the nanostructures [7,10,20]. The size of the nanostructures governs the scattering and absorption ratios, active surface plasmon (SP) mode, the peak position of the plasmon mode, and localization of the plasmons [21]. Previous investigations [22] showed that the variations in size of the nanostructures can boost the MEF enhancement factor (MEF-EF). MEF-EF is defined as the ratio of fluorescence intensity between nanostructured and conventional glass substrates, measured at the same wavelength and under the same experimental conditions. The shape of the nanostructures is another critical parameter for describing the plasmonic characteristics [20]. Different shapes of nanostructures such as nanowires [10], spheres [13], rods [19,22,23], cubes [24,25], triangles [26,27], and crescent-like structures [28], were developed with multiple methods to tune the spectral properties, i.e., to boost the efficiency and MEF-EF [9,29,30].
Understanding and controlling the fluorescence properties in certain types of materials, as well as the materials’ nanostructures design and their optimization resulted in substantial improvement in many areas, from optoelectronics to biological sensing [9,21,29,30,31]. This article briefly describes metal enhanced fluorescence, its fundamental mechanism, and critically reviews the manufacturing methods to fabricate plasmonic nanostructures to enhance the MEF characteristics. Although many reviews have been published on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing, this review focuses on morphology-dependent plasmonic nanostructures with MEF biocompatible platforms, in order to consolidate knowledge in its category.

2. Metal Enhanced Fluorescence

2.1. When Metal Enhanced Fluorescence Occur?

MEF is also known as plasmon-enhanced fluorescence or surface-enhanced fluorescence. It was first reported in the 1970s [32], and later adopted as a sensing technology, which was recognized in recent years due to the emergence of plasmonic nanostructures [9,33]. Various theoretical and experimental approaches have been published recently on MEF [30,34]. It is perceived that MEF occurs when fluorophores are excited near the metal surface at a distance ranging from 5 to 90 nm [34,35,36]. However, the fluorophores are quenched due to direct contact or being within the proximity (<5 nm) of the metallic surface. Thus, the interplay between the fluorophores distance and quenching effects either dominates or overwhelms the MEF enhancement factor [22,34]. Metallic nanostructures can enhance the fluorescence intensity to a scale of several hundred. However, there are inconsistent reports regarding the actual distance that delivers the maximum enhancement.
Similarly, numerous mechanisms of fluorescence enhancement have been reported; however, the precise mechanism is still debatable because of the complexity of the interactions between the metallic surface and the fluorophores. MEF is a complex phenomenon involving surface plasmon (SP) and the near optical field, which leads to enhancement in fluorescence intensity and photostability, but degrades the analyte life-span [37,38,39].

2.2. Metal Enhanced Fluorescence Mechanism

Considering the electromagnetic interactions, enhancement of MEF occurs due to several factors such as: (1) the localized surface plasmon effect, (2) the plasmon effect due to non-radiative interactions, and (3) the intrinsic lifetime [40,41]. As a first factor, the metallic structures or particles generate the LSPR effect, which strengthens the localized electromagnetic field, as shown in Figure 1a [8,42]. When incident light interacts with the metallic structures, it produces localized surface plasmon oscillations, which generate a highly concentrated electromagnetic field effect around the structures. This field-effect modifies the absorption characteristics of localized fluorophores by increasing their physical size [43,44], which results in enhanced fluorescence intensity due to their coupling with the nano-particles or -structures [45]. It is well-known that the geometry of the nanostructures is crucial in determining the MEF-EF. The fluorescence emission intensity from fluorophores increases under resonance condition due to the enhanced field effect at the edges and corners of the nanostructures, which enhances the MEF-EF [22,23,36,46].
As a second factor, non-radiative interaction mediates the SP coupling effect, as shown in Figure 1b [36,47]. This phenomenon results in excitation enhancement due to spectral overlap between the SP and fluorophores absorption band near or over the surface of the metallic nanostructures [40,41]. This overlap determines the dominant factor to be either Forster resonance energy transfer or the Purcell effect, and further, how this factor leads to quenching or fluorescence enhancement [48,49,50]. At the optimal distance, the fluorescence intensity is increased due to energy transfer between the SP and the fluorophores; this energy transfer is known as Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). FRET is also known as a process of electron transfer through molecules [51,52]. Consensus is in place among researchers that the optimal distance between the metallic surface and fluorophores is critically important [34,35,36]. Recent theoretical and experimental studies have shown that non-radiative energy transfer not only depends on the EM field strength, but also on the spectral properties (i.e., absorption, scattering, emission) overlap, which leads to efficient fluorescence enhancement [37,47,48]. It is deduced that the fluorescence enhancement achieved within ~10 nm to metallic nanostructures surfaces, can be explained through FRET. The enhancement achieved through larger separations (10–50 nm) elucidates on the basis of the Purcell effect, which justifies the enhancement on the basis of controlled modification of the coupling between the light and matter [8,34,49]. The excitation enhancement is maximized using the metallic structures, which absorb light rather than scattering it, and with a concentrated electromagnetic field confined in narrow gaps or sharp edges of the metallic nanostructures, as shown in Figure 1d,e [50,53]. A few nanometers change in the geometry of the metallic structures significantly affect the excitation enhancement, which facilitates the development of MEF-based sensors with high sensitivity.
For the third factor of an intrinsic lifetime, the fluorophores and metallic nanostructures stay in close vicinity to each other. Therefore, the excited fluorophores couple together with the SP band of metallic nanostructures, generating new MEF decay pathways for energy transfer. The said phenomena facilitate the non-radiative energy transfer from the metallic nanostructures to fluorophores, allowing the fluorophores to excite and transmit energy to the far-field as radiative transfer, thus enhancing the fluorescence intensity (Figure 1c) [54,55]. The radiative rate of energy transfer from fluorophores can be modified by fine-tuning the metallic structures, which further decreases the fluorophore’s lifetime, due to the enhanced rate of radiative decay. In general, these coupling interactions correspond to the spectral overlap between SP and the emission band of the fluorophores. Therefore, quenching or a fluorescence emissions enhancement is possible depending upon the separation distance between fluorophores and metallic structures [47,53,54]. It is reported that if fluorophores are within a few nanometers of the metallic surface, the emissions will be quenched [44]. However, SP can still re-radiate the sufficient amount of quenched energy, which enhances the emission intensity [56,57]. However, this effect is minimized in the near-field region due to higher-order SP oscillations, which do not allow fluorophores to re-radiate; thus, the overall emission is quenched [56,57,58]. At larger distances where the Purcell effect dominates, it leads to an enhancement in the radiative rate rather than the free space. Whereas, if the SP scatters more than absorption, then it will lead to fluorophores emissions enhancements [50,53]. It is difficult to achieve a pure emissions or excitations enhancement because of the wider SP scattering and absorption lines relative to fluorophores and a limited Stoke’s shift of dye. Therefore, a balance is required to present the overall enhancement effect. In general, quenching dominates at a few nanometers scale, which evolves into a too large enhancement (10–1000X) at the range of 10 to 50 nm separation. Thereafter, there is a turn to normal fluorescence emissions as the distance between the nanostructures further increases [59,60,61].
The size of the nanostructures affects the SP spectral properties, i.e., absorption and scattering cross-sections. The SP absorption is dominant for nanostructures smaller than 20 nm, whereas, scattering dominates for larger dimensions and increases with the increase in the size of the structures. This behavior is defined as “ratio of scattering to absorption”, which is size-dependent and independent of the nanostructures aspect ratio [62]. Spectral properties are greatly affected by the shape of the nanostructures [63]. For example, anisotropic morphologies, i.e., nanorods, nanotriangles, and cubes reported for enhancement of the LSPR effect [64,65]. However, their performance is reported as: highest sensitivity for nanorods, followed by nano triangles, and then nanospheres [62]. The selection of the shape depends on the creation of “hot spot” regions, where the electromagnetic field is enhanced due to the localized SP effect, which concurrently enhances the fluorescence intensity.

2.3. Metal Enhanced Fluorescence from Plasmonic Nanostructures

2.3.1. Conventional Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence

Since flat glass slides coated with metallic island films has demonstrated [66] MEF, MEF has had exceptional growth in biosensing, biotechnology, and bioimaging applications [9,67,68]. Metallic island films were commonly grown for fabricating MEF nanostructured surfaces due to their intrinsic characteristic of supporting the SPs in the visible (VIS) and near-infrared regions [12,21]. In addition to the conventional metallic island films, colloidal nanoparticles were used extensively over the years for MEF applications, including for cellular imaging or paper-based MEF substrates for one-time usage [69,70]. To achieve significant MEF enhancement, researchers fabricated different nanostructured surfaces, including nanotriangles, fractals, and cube-like structures using various materials [71,72,73]. In each case, the resulting nanostructures showed significantly higher enhancement than the planar island films.

2.3.2. Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence

The recent developments in nanostructure fabrication for MEF applications over the past 10 years have evolved for broadening the spectral range due to the need for MEF-based analyses. These analyses required a substantial overlap between the plasmon absorption band of the plasmonic nanostructures and the fluorescence excitation band of the fluorophores. Nanostructures have the potential to tune the spectral properties at a specific wavelength; most of the recent developments focus on tuning the plasmon absorption band over a broad spectral range (VIS to NIR) by utilizing different materials with different structural geometry and shapes, and by maintaining an optimal distance [64,74,75].
In this section, the recent developments in plasmonic nanostructures for enhancing the MEF factor are described, with details in further subsections. These sections highlight the different shapes and geometries of plasmonic nanostructures and their optimal enhancement. All the quantitative and deduced data have been adopted from the referred publications, with proper citations.

Metal Enhanced Fluorescence from Nano-Particles and Nanoclusters Fabricated by Chemical Synthesis Methods

Since the first attempt was taken to produce a MEF sensing platform using the Ag core–shell and silica core–shell particles [76], there has been an increasing demand to achieve an ideal MEF substrate for a better understanding of the MEF phenomenon with solution-based suspension methods. A summary of such structures with the MEF-EF is given in Table 2. It is reported that the MEF enhancement forms the metallic nanoparticles that critically depend on shape, interparticle distance, dielectric constant, and physical dimensions [7,57,77]. For metallic nanostructures/nanoparticles, the surface plasmon polarization (SPP) cannot exit, while the whole excitation happens because of strong LSPR. Hence, in nanoparticles- or nanocluster-based sensors, LSPR is used to enhance fluorescence by enhancing the fluorophores excitations or emissions [44,53]. In the case of enhanced excitations, the SP band overlaps with the fluorophores absorption band [78], and the separation distance should be minimized between the metal nanoparticles and the fluorophores [44,53]. In case of enhanced emissions, the SP band overlap with the fluorophores’ emissions band [59,60,61], and the separation distance should be maintained at around 10 to 30 nm [53]. Controlling these factors can significantly enhance the MEF performance for specific applications due to an enhanced electric field generated at the edges of the fabricated nanoparticles. Many researchers have performed studies to improve the MEF-EF by controlling the above-stated factors, especially the relationship between orientation and distance of fluorophores from the metallic surfaces [77,79,80]. Due to the coupling effect between the SPR band of the metallic nano-particles array surfaces and the fluorophores emissions, the fluorescence intensity from the nano-particles arrays was influenced by the distribution of the nanoparticles [81]. The metallic nanoparticles or clusters fabrication onto the substrate often generates randomly distributed “hotspots”, which help to attain a high fluorescence signal [60,82,83,84,85]. However, these structures have limited ability to achieve a high and uniform enhancement factor over a large area. Nanospheres, as depicted in Figure 2, fabricated by chemically synthesized silica spheres with thermally deposited Cu, show significant enhancement due to the tuning of LSPR modes [13]. It was found that the fluorophores’ quenching effect was enhanced at the longer wavelengths near the metallic surface, however with the fine-tuning of the nanostructures, the LSPR mode overcomes the quenching effect, and target molecules achieve an enhancement factor 89.2-fold compared with the reference substrate [13].
Recently, newly developed surfaces with anisotropic morphologies have gained more attention than the sphere-like morphologies due to their sharper pinnacles or vertices, which leads to the generation of stronger LSPR and local electromagnetic field effects [64,86,87]. In addition, these anisotropic structures also provide an opportunity to tune the wavelength over a wide range, from visible to near-infrared (NIR) [65]. For example, AuNRs, Ag, and AuNCs have rod-shaped, triangular-shaped, and nano-crescent structures, respectively. These structural features are used for tuning the LSPR characteristics over a wide range of wavelengths from visible to NIR, including the transparent biological window by adjusting the aspect ratio [28,88,89,90]. Therefore, anisotropic structures have great potential to be applied for constructing a highly sensitive MEF system for biological sensing.
Peng et al. [88] recently reported fluorescence enhancement from nanorod structures. Two DNAs were immobilized through their 5′ ends onto the edges of the nanorods, making the bond of Au-S, followed by the complementary target DNA immobilization, which was labeled with cyanine-5 (Cy5) as shown in Figure 3. The presence of nanorods demonstrated a large fluorescence enhancement when compared with a reference substrate without nanorods. This enhancement was attributed to the dual amplification phenomena. Firstly, there is an end-to-end coupling, which helps to tune and achieve an excellent spectral overlap at 660 nm between the LSPR band of AuNRs and Cy5 fluorophores; this further provides the opportunity for fluorescence enhancement due to a “hotspot” region, which typically occurs at the corners. Secondly, the DNA strand displacement helps to overcome quenching. Nanorods conjugated with fluorophores have also been reported as dual-modal nanoprobes for MEF and SERS enhancement [84]. Despite this, the dual-modal performance of nanorods structures was reported with an MEF-EF of only 2.2. There could be two possibilities for the lower MEF-EF, either: (1) inactive spectral overlapping of the plasmon and fluorophores absorption band, as the LSPR band generated at 510 nm, or (2) the growth of specific fluorophores dimeric species on the surface of the nanorods.
Table
Table 2. Summary of various nanostructures and nanoparticles fabricated via chemical synthesis methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
Table 2. Summary of various nanostructures and nanoparticles fabricated via chemical synthesis methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
MaterialConfiguration of StructuresStructures Feature Size (nm)Wavelength λ (nm)FluorophoreEFYearRef.
AuNanocompositeDia: 20 nm375 nmAmantadine hydrochloride1.42018[91]
AuNanorodsDia: 17 nm
Length: 43 nm		532/785 nmRhodamine B2.22012[84]
AuNanoshellsDia: 200 nm760 nmRhodamine 6102.42011[92]
AuNanoparticleDia: 33 nm450 nmPPQ-Zn2+-PPQ32019[41]
Ag@SiO2@PMOsNanocubesDia: 50 nm465 nmCu2+32016[93]
Ag2D nanoparticle arraysDia: 20 nm532 nmRhodamine 6G32012[94]
Ag@SiO2-AuNanoclustersDia: 50 nm610 nmAuNCs3.22019[95]
Au@SiO2-NH2@AuNanoclustersDia: 99 nm610 nmAuNCs3.72018[60]
AuNanorods-753 nmCy74.362020[96]
AuNanobipyramids-751 nmCy75.632020[96]
AgColloidal nanoparticlesDia: 123 nm560 nmRhodamine 70072019[97]
AgNanowires on templatePores Dia: 200 nm550 nmRhodamine B7.52018[98]
Ag3D nanoparticle arraysDia: 20 nm532 nmRhodamine 6G8.52012[94]
Au@SiO2Core-shell nanoparticlesDia: 89.7642 nmAlexa92020[99]
Ag/Au@SilcaNanoclustersDia: 37 nm
Thickness: 13 nm		635 nmCy59.42010[100]
CuNCsNanoclustersDia: 40–50 nm574 nmCS-GSH-CuNCs102020[101]
Ag@SiO2NanoparticleDia: 90 nm370 nmAu25122017[102]
AgNanoshellsDia: 5 nm420 nmRhodamine 123202010[103]
Ag/AuNanoclusterDia: 25 nm548 nmCy5352010[82]
AuNanorodsDia: 13 nm635 nmCy5402010[85]
Ag@SiO2Core-shell nanoparticlesDia: 89.7642 nmAlexa702020[99]
CuNanospheresDia: 462 nm650 nmPorphyrin892013[13]
AgNanoshellsDia: 50–80 nm514.5 nmRhodamine B942012[83]
AuNanorodsDia: 18.1760 nmstreptavidin-CW8001002018[104]
AuNanoclusterDia: 20 nm365 nmEu3+-EUTC1002014[105]
Ag@AuNaprisms-532 nmIr-Zne1102017[89]

Metal Enhanced Fluorescence from Non-Periodic Nanostructures Fabricated by Deposition Methods

This section describes another category of MEF nanostructures which have been significantly practiced over the past decade due to their inherent characteristics of time-efficient, economical, and large-area fabrication with the ability to tune the spectral properties [17,22,23]. MEF enhancement critically depends on the morphology of the nanostructures. Compared to other types of structures, deposition methods enable control over size, porosity, and importantly, the shape of the nanostructures, by manipulating the operating parameters, such as evaporation time, deposition rate, and incident angle [17,106,107]. Using the deposition methods, various functional coinage metals, i.e., Cu, Ag, Au, and Al, were used as building blocks to construct the numerous structures for enhancing the MEF-EF as summarized in Table 3. Anisotropic thin-film nanorods-like structures were fabricated by oblique angle deposition (OAD), to improve the MEF enhancement factor. Ju et al. [108] and Dhruv et al. [109] fabricated slanted nanorod structures by OAD and they studied the suitability of the structures for MEF applications. Ji et al. [106] fabricated zigzag structures, as shown in Figure 4a, by employing OAD, and reported a 28-fold EF for Alexa 488 detection with a 0.01 pM detection limit. Although anisotropic nanorods made with other methods were previously reported [85,89], Ji’s work has put forward a pathway for deposition experts in fabricating the MEF-based biosensor using deposition methods. The plasmonic response from such structures can be tuned by controlling the size of nanostructures, which helps to overlap the SP characteristics with the excitation of fluorophores. Recently, Badshah et al. [22] fabricated vertical nanorod structures, as shown in Figure 4b, by using glancing angle deposition (GLAD) and studied their feasibility for MEF applications. It was reported that increasing the length of the vertical nanorod structures changes the morphology of the nanorod structures. They also reported a 200-fold MEF-EF on the nanostructured surface (diameter: 120 nm, and length: 500 nm) using Cy5 fluorophores, compared to a reference substrate [22]. The researchers believed that the “illuminating-rod effect”, due to the enhanced electromagnetic field and the LSPR effect, might be the main contributor for enhancing the MEF-EF, along with the separation distance (20–30 nm) between the nanostructured surface and the DNA-conjugated fluorophores [22,80]. It was also found that the controlled porosity, diameter, and length of the nanostructures contribute significantly to enhance the MEF enhancement factor [22,109].
Although significant MEF performance is reported from all these fabricated structures, it is not possible to predict the performance of the structures precisely through theoretical modeling. The validity of these nanostructures needs additional experimental investigations to show exceptional enhancement in MEF and structural optimization, which is not a systematic approach to tune the spectral properties.

Metal Enhanced Fluorescence from Periodical Nanostructures Fabricated by Lithography Methods

Modern lithography is a powerful tool to fabricate periodic metallic nanostructures that can be tailored for efficient MEF studies to understand the underlying MEF concept. Irrespective of the type of structure, lithographic methods have the advantage of fabricating periodic structures, which can be utilized to map or predict the MEF performance with efficient process control [18,26,50]. A summary of such periodic structures with their MEF-EF is arranged in Table 4. The nano-prisms or nanotriangles fabricated by e-beam lithography has demonstrated a 33-fold MEF enhancement by controlling the feature size [18]. Levene et al. [116] reported on the fluorescence-based detection of single-molecule DNA in low volumes (10−18–10−21 L) inside a zero-mode waveguide (ZMW) consisting of holes array structures fabricated by e-beam lithography. This arrangement enables them to be adopted as a commercially available platform (Pacific Biosciences) for single-molecule DNA detection with real-time sequencing [117]. Although ZMWs fluorescence-based platforms gained recognition, the standard platform has the potential to be improved by robust optimization. Al is a known plasmonic material with low electromagnetic field enhancement; different structure shapes in conjunction with other plasmonic materials (Au or Ag) can further enhance the electromagnetic field and fluorescence. Recently, Paolo et al. [118] have reported the bi-metallic (Au–Al) nano-slots structures with improved sensitivity. It was reported that the bi-metallic nano-slots structures enhanced the fluorescence by 30-fold compared with the standard ZMW platform. In a similar study, researchers have fabricated bowtie nanoantenna structures by e-beam lithography and reported [50] 1340-fold MEF-EF with low quantum yield of N,N1-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1,6,11,16-tetra-[4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenoxy] quaterrylene-3,4:13,14-bis(dicarboximide) (TPQDI) dye. A similar MEF enhancement was reported [119] with an EF of 1100-fold using the nanoantenna-in-box platform fabricated by focused ion beam milling (FIB). In spite of the promising results, the widespread implications of the e-beam lithography process are limited because of the difficulty in producing the nanostructures over a large area.
Nanoimprinting has the advantage of producing periodic structures over a large area, with homogeneity. Recently, a plasmonic nano-lens array, as shown in Figure 5a was fabricated by nanoimprinting. The developed structures demonstrated a 128-fold MEF-EF for a biomolecule streptavidin conjugated with Cy5, by controlling the inter-lens spacing [30]. Recently, ZnO-nanorods structures with an Au layer were reported to have an EF of ~300-fold [120]. It was deduced that the optimized geometry of the ZnO structures enhanced the electromagnetic field. At the same time, the Au layer above the nanorods helps to reduce the absorption and results in enhanced emission [120]. “Disk-coupled dots-on-pillar antenna array” (D2PA) structures, as shown in Figure 5b, reported from the Stephen chou group at Princeton University, have demonstrated 2970-fold [121] and 7400-fold [122] MEF-EF for detection of immunoassays of Protein A and Immunoglobulin G (IgG), respectively. The team has also reported 4 × 106-fold promising enhancement with a single fluorophore located in the proximity of the “hotspot” region [122]. The fluorescence enhancement occurred due to the generation of a highly confined electromagnetic field induced by the SP, localized within the “hot-spots”, which results in enhanced excitation of fluorophores and therefore increases the fluorophores radiative decay rate, which further enhanced the fluorescence.
Table
Table 4. Summary of various nanostructures fabricated via various lithography methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
Table 4. Summary of various nanostructures fabricated via various lithography methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
MaterialConfiguration of StructuresStructures Feature Size (nm)Wavelength λ (nm)FluorophoreEFYearRef.
AgNano trianglesDia: 300 nm525 nmAlexa 4887.82013[26]
AgConcentric gratingsWidth: 200 nm
Height: 65 nm		635 nmAlexa 647102011[123]
AgNano gratingsPitch: 300 nm532 nmRhodamine 6G142011[124]
Al2O3@AgNano gratingsDia: 142 nm
Height: 67 nm		400 nmRhodamine 6G142016[125]
AgNanodotsDia: 100 nm
Height: 30 nm		 560 nmCy3152011[126]
AuNanocylindersDia: 100 nm
Height: 35 nm		580 nmCdSe/ZnS core shells262006[18]
AgNano gratingsPitch: 375 nm532 nmRhodamine 6G302011[124]
AuNanoprismsWidth: 100 nm
Height: 35 nm		580 nmCdSe/ZnS core shells332006[18]
AuNanogapsHeight: 60 nm
Pitch: 400 nm		670 nmCy547.42014[127]
AgNano trianglesDia: 500 nm780 nmAlexa 790832013[26]
AgNano gratingsHeight: 44 nm
Pitch: 400 nm		530/550 nmRhodamine 6G1162015[128]
Ag3D nanodomesDia: 250 nm
Height: 100 nm
Pitch: 500 nm		635 nmstreptavidin-Cy51282018[30]
Ag3D nano gratingsHeight: 30 nm
Pitch: 480 nm		632.8 nmCy51702017[129]
ZnONanorodsDia: 230 nm
Height: 1.5 µm
Pitch: 390 nm		532 nmRhodamine 6G3002019[120]
Au@SiO2NanopilllarDia: 100 nm
Pitch: 200 nm		800 nmIRDye-800cw-labelled goat antihuman IgG9102019[130]
AunanoantennaDia: 76 nm
Height: 50 nm		633 nmAlexa 64711002013[119]
Aubowtie nanoantenna-780/820 nmTPQDI13402009[50]
AuD2PA nanoantennaDia: 100 nm
Height: 65 nm
Pitch: 200 nm		785 nmICG, IgG2970, 74002012, 2012[121,122]
In summary, the fluorophores coupling with the extreme EM fields of the LSPs can enhance the intensity of fluorescence emission up to several orders of magnitude. The “hotspot” region demonstrated the highest MEF enhancements, with a single fluorophore. Several researchers have reported >103 MEF-EF for various nanostructure configurations with a combination of fluorophores with low quantum yield [121,122].

2.4. Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensors Applications

Over the decades, an increasing number of studies have reported implementing MEF-based sensing with pre-established technologies, i.e., fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence microarray scanners, microplate readers, or with new devices developed for fluorescence signal amplification. Combining the plasmonic nanostructures with immunoassays or microarrays offers the unique advantages of detectability, and introduces a wide range of fluorescence-based applications with a large variety of commercially available analytes, as summarized in Table 5. Various detection analytes, including biomarkers, pathogens, and toxins, have been reported in the literature with new detection methodologies and enhanced detection limits to provide a valuable tool for early diagnosis [131,132], point-of-care (POC) diagnosis [133,134], and forensic applications [122,135]. Metallic nanoparticles with a silica spacer and a silica core were reported for quantitative detection of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with high sensitivity [133]. The detection antibody was attached to a 50 nm Ag particle labeled with RuBpy dye to monitor the fluorescence intensity associated with the binding event. The reported detection time was 30 min for the binding event with a detection limit of 0.20 ng/mL [133]. In another study, the metallic vertical nanorods were used for the quantitative detection of human semen and vaginal fluids [135]. The sensor chip with Ag-nanorod structures was spotted with the semenogelin-2 antibody and anti-17 beta-estradiol antibody and blocked with 15% dry milk and 85% 1× PBS solution. For detection, the daylight-conjugated protein sample was incubated and reacted with the antibodies and washed after 1-h incubation. The sensor chip provides a semen and vaginal fluid detection limit as low as 0.06 µg/mL and 0.005 µg/mL, respectively [135]. In similar studies, a sensor chip was developed for detecting the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) proteins [134] and swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viruses (S-OIV) [131] using the LSPs fluorescence method. The detection limits of 0.1 pg/mL for the SARS-CoV N protein [134], and 13.9 pg/mL for S-OIV [131] have been documented.
Immunoassay’s fluorescence detects the target analytes in the buffer solution by selective capturing of the biomarker with tags immobilized over the sensor surfaces. Zhou et al. [122] have reported the D2PA nanoantenna structures and a molecular spacer to enhance fluorescence intensity of protein A immunoassay and human IgG. The detection limit of 0.3 fM (1 × 10−7 nM) was reported with a detection time of 1 h. In another study, Zhang et al. [130] have reported on the EBOV immunoassay sensor for the detection of EBOLA virus using 3D plasmonic nanoantenna arrays. The detection limit of ≈220 fg/mL, which was ≈240,000-fold higher than the existing FDA recommended EBOV-rapid-immunoassay.
In the current scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid and real-time detection is desirous. Ganguli et al. [136] reported a fluorescence-based sensing platform with a detection limit of 50 RNA copies/µL in the viral transport medium solution, and 5000 RNA copies/µL in the nasal solution. The rapid detection has been demonstrated within 40 min, which makes fluorescence-based detection a viable solution for mass-testing in the current situation.
Table
Table 5. Overview of metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensors for the detection of various analytes, with information on detection limit, detection time, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
Table 5. Overview of metal enhanced fluorescence-based biosensors for the detection of various analytes, with information on detection limit, detection time, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
Detection AnalyteDetection TimeLimit of DetectionYearRef.
Mouse IgG antigen-0.25 µg/mL2015[132]
Human Semen60 min0.06 µg/mL2018[135]
Human Vaginal Fluid60 min0.005 µg/mL2018[135]
Human immunoglobulins60 min0.0008 µg/mL2019[137]
FITC-labeled YebF protein from Escherichia coli-17.2 ng/mL2020[138]
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)30 min0.20 ng/mL2017[133]
S-OIV-13.9 pg/mL2010[131]
17-β-estradiolReal-time1 pg/mL2017[139]
SARS-CoV-1 pg/mL2009[134]
Kidney injury molecule-1-500 fg/mL2018[104]
Ebola virus10 s220 fg/mL2019[130]
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-0.5 fg/mL2018[104]
DNA-oligonucleotides-2.5 × 104 nM2015[36]
CD4-mRNA expression60 mints125 nM2019[140]
GlucoseReal-time50 nM2015[141]
Intracellular Adenosine triphosphate-35 nM2020[96]
Lysozyme in Human SerumReal-Time1.6 nM2020[101]
Human Immunoglobulin G-10 nM2014[79]
Carbohydrate-lectin5 s0.87 nM2015[111]
DNA aptamer20 min0.33 nM2015[142]
Acetylcholinesterase-0.01 nM2018[143]
Streptavidin10 min0.05 nM2011[144]
Hairpin ssDNA30 min10 pM2017[80]
miRNA-21-Bladder cancer-related biomarker in Urine120 min26.3 fM2019[145]
Human NOGGIN25 µs1.5 × 10−3 nM2018[146]
Alexa 488 labelled oligonucleotide-1 × 10−5 nM2016[106]
Human IgG60 min1 × 10−7 nM2012[122]

2.5. Summary and Future Outlook

The continuous exploration of MEF underlying principles and multiple fabrication approaches has increased the success factor in plasmonic nanostructures research. During the past decades, various nanostructures based MEF platforms have been developed and applied in the field of biotechnology and life sciences. These have added the extra features of incident light confinement, spectral properties tunability, enhanced electromagnetic field, and improved signal-to-noise ratio to MEF platforms due to their geometries. This article critically reviews the fabrication methods, material selection, and dimensional features of nanostructures, which can significantly enhance the EF and sensing accuracy. It has been observed that each fabrication method exhibits significant MEF performance due to morphological-specific features. For example, metallic core-shell nanoparticles fabricated by chemical synthesis methods [97,100] have demonstrated enhancements beyond the MEF standard approach through controlling the cavity, which concentrates the electromagnetic field [13]. Similarly, the localization of the electromagnetic field increases with an increase in the length of nanostructures when fabricated with deposition methods [23,109].
Despite the continuous enhancement in the MEF factor, significant challenges still need to be resolved in order to achieve widespread usability of MEF-based technology, and to reach its full potential. One of the potential research domains is to predict the effect of the dielectric medium and nanostructures geometry on the MEF performance. Maxwell’s equation-based numerical simulations have the potential to evaluate the structure-based performance. However, due to the complexity of its nature, there is a need for accurate and straightforward methods to predict and optimize structural performance. Dipole–dipole coupling methods could be another option, but they have not yet been fully explored for MEF-based applications. Another research domain is the fabrication of large-area MEF substrates with uniform structural features, i.e., size, shape, and distribution with control, precision, and repeatability at the nanoscale resolution, to govern spectral properties. When designing the nanostructures, a combination of appropriate material selection and state-of-art fabrication methods is desired. A brief comparison of fabrication methods in terms of resolution, design flexibility, and throughput is illustrated in Figure 6.
Another potential research domain is the development of new fabrication technologies to develop nanostructures with high throughput, ultrahigh resolution, and design flexibility in an economical way. Chemical synthesis and deposition methods presently provide marginal accuracy with high throughput for nanostructures fabrication, while lithography methods are expensive to apply for large-area applications. Therefore, new fabrication approaches, combining the existing techniques, are required to fabricate highly sensitive biosensors for widespread MEF-based applications. Nanoimprinting lithography (NIL) is notable among other reported methods due to its potential for controlling the nano-feature size with high throughput and high resolution [122]; it was adapted to achieve an enhancement factor on the order of > 103. Such a giant MEF enhancement has made the fabricated platform capable of detecting 0.3 fM (1 × 10−7 nM) human IgG. Recently, Zang et al. [130] reported on 3D nanoantenna structures fabricated by combining advanced nanoimprinting and deposition methods with precise dimensional control, for detecting the EBOLA virus with improved sensitivity of 240,000-fold compared to the FDA-recommended EBOV immunoassay sensor. The advancement has paved the way for future developments required for early diagnostics of diseases. Recently, SARC-CoV-2 genome RNA detection was demonstrated for real-time-point of diagnostics using the fluorescence-based portable platform with a detection limit of 5000 RNA copies/µL. However, further developments are required to accelerate rapid and real-time detections. These developments would collectively improve the fabrication of highly sensitive and portable platforms, which will help to stimulate future developments for real-time diagnostics of SARC-CoV-2 by providing a substitute for the laboratory-based test.

Author Contributions

M.A.B.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, supervision, writing—original draft. N.Y.K.: investigation, data curation. A.W.Z.: investigation, data curation, writing—original draft. N.A.: investigation, resources, writing—original draft. Z.Z.: investigation, data curation. M.W.S.: data curation, methodology. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Collin Brown for English language editing support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ekimov, A.I.; Efros, A.L.; Onushchenko, A.A. Quantum size effect in semiconductor microcrystals. Solid State Commun. 1985, 56, 921–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gittleman, J.I.; Abeles, B.; Bozowski, S. Superparamsgnetism and relaxation effects in granular Ni-SiO2, and Ni-Al2O3 films. Phys. Rev. B 1974, 9, 3891–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maier, S.A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2007; ISBN 0387331506. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mayer, K.M.; Hafner, J.H. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3828–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kumar, A.; Kim, S.; Nam, J.M. Plasmonically Engineered Nanoprobes for Biomedical Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14509–14525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Reiner, A.T.; Fossati, S.; Dostalek, J. Biosensor platform for parallel surface plasmon-enhanced epifluorescence and surface plasmon resonance detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, J.-E.; Kim, J.; Nam, J.-M. Emerging plasmonic nanostructures for controlling and enhancing photoluminescence. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4696–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, M.; Cushing, S.K.; Wu, N. Plasmon-enhanced optical sensors: A review. Analyst 2015, 140, 386–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Darvill, D.; Centeno, A.; Xie, F. Plasmonic fluorescence enhancement by metal nanostructures: Shaping the future of bionanotechnology. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 15709–15726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Strobbia, P.; Languirand, E.; Cullum, B.M. Recent advances in plasmonic nanostructures for sensing: A review. Opt. Eng. 2015, 54, 100902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Petryayeva, E.; Krull, U.J. Localized surface plasmon resonance: Nanostructures, bioassays and biosensing—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 706, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, H.; Peng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Z.Y. Plasmon-enhanced light–matter interactions and applications. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sugawa, K.; Tamura, T.; Tahara, H.; Yamaguchi, D.; Akiyama, T.; Otsuki, J.; Kusaka, Y.; Fukuda, N.; Ushijima, H. Metal-enhanced fluorescence platforms based on plasmonic ordered copper arrays: Wavelength dependence of quenching and enhancement effects. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9997–10010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tittl, A.; Mai, P.; Taubert, R.; Dregely, D.; Liu, N.; Giessen, H. Palladium-based plasmonic perfect absorber in the visible wavelength range and its application to hydrogen sensing. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4366–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Langhammer, C.; Yuan, Z.; Zorić, I.; Kasemo, B. Plasmonic properties of supported Pt and Pd nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Le Ru, E.C.; Etchegoin, P.G. Introduction to Plasmons and Plasmonics. In Principles of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 121–183. [Google Scholar]
  17. Karabchevsky, A. Publisher’s Note: Microspot sensing based on surface-enhanced fluorescence from nanosculptured thin films. J. Nanophotonics 2012, 6, 060105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pompa, P.P.; Martiradonna, L.; Della Torre, A.; Della Sala, F.; Manna, L.; de Vittorio, M.; Calabi, F.; Cinagolani, R.; Rinaldi, R. Metal-enhanced fluorescence of colloidal nanocrystals with nanoscale control. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Shao, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, J. Gold nanorods and their plasmonic properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2679–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chung, T.; Lee, S.Y.; Song, E.Y.; Chun, H.; Lee, B. Plasmonic nanostructures for nano-scale bio-sensing. Sensors 2011, 11, 10907–10929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rycenga, M.; Cobley, C.M.; Zeng, J.; Li, W.; Moran, C.H.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, D.; Xia, Y. Controlling the synthesis and assembly of silver nanostructures for plasmonic applications. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3669–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Badshah, M.A.; Ju, J.; Lu, X.; Abbas, N.; Kim, S. min Enhancing the sensitivity of DNA microarrays by metal-enhanced fluorescence using vertical nanorod structures. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2018, 274, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Badshah, M.A.; Lu, X.; Ju, J.; Kim, S. Silver nanorod structures for metal enhanced fluorescence. In Proceedings of the Nanoengineering: Fabrication, Properties, Optics, and Devices XIII, San Diego, CA, USA, 30–31 August 2016; Volume 9927, p. 992715. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sherry, L.J.; Chang, S.H.; Schatz, G.C.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Wiley, B.J.; Xia, Y. Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy of single silver nanocubes. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2034–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tavakkoli Yaraki, M.; Daqiqeh Rezaei, S.; Tan, Y.N. Simulation guided design of silver nanostructures for plasmon-enhanced fluorescence, singlet oxygen generation and SERS applications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 5673–5687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xie, F.; Pang, J.S.; Centeno, A.; Ryan, M.P.; Riley, D.J.; Alford, N.M. Nanoscale control of Ag nanostructures for plasmonic fluorescence enhancement of near-infrared dyes. Nano Res. 2013, 6, 496–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, G.; Lewandowska, M. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence provided by silver nanoprisms for sensitive detection of sulfide. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2019, 292, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bukasov, R.; Ali, T.A.; Nordlander, P.; Shumaker-Parry, J.S. Probing the Plasmonic Near-Field of Gold Nanocrescent Antennas. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6639–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Badshah, M.A.; Dong, L.; Li, J.; Kim, S.M.; Lu, M. A programmable nanoreplica molding for the fabrication of nanophotonic devices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Badshah, M.A.; Kim, J.; Jang, H.; Kim, S.M. Fabrication of highly packed plasmonic nanolens array using polymer nanoimprinted nanodots for an enhanced fluorescence substrate. Polymers 2018, 10, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Suzuki, M. Practical applications of thin films nanostructured by shadowing growth. J. Nanophotonics 2013, 7, 073598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Drexhage, K.H. Influence of a dielectric interface on fluorescence decay time. J. Lumin. 1970, 1–2, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bauch, M.; Toma, K.; Toma, M.; Zhang, Q.; Dostalek, J. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence Biosensors: A Review. Plasmonics 2014, 9, 781–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Liaw, J.W.; Tsai, H.Y.; Huang, C.H. Size-Dependent Surface Enhanced Fluorescence of Gold Nanorod: Enhancement or Quenching. Plasmonics 2012, 7, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ray, K.; Badugu, R.; Lakowicz, J.R. Distance-dependent metal-enhanced fluorescence from Langmuir-Blodgett monolayers of Alkyl-NBD derivatives on silver island films. Langmuir 2006, 22, 8374–8378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Puchkova, A.; Vietz, C.; Pibiri, E.; Wünsch, B.; Sanz Paz, M.; Acuna, G.P.; Tinnefeld, P. DNA Origami Nanoantennas with over 5000-fold Fluorescence Enhancement and Single-Molecule Detection at 25 μm. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8354–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lakowicz, J.R.; Ray, K.; Chowdhury, M.; Szmacinski, H.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Nowaczyk, K. Plasmon-controlled fluorescence: A new paradigm in fluorescence spectroscopy. Analyst 2008, 133, 1308–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Geddes, C.D. Metal-enhanced fluorescence. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 19537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karolin, J.O.; Geddes, C.D. Reduced lifetimes are directly correlated with excitation irradiance in metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF). J. Fluoresc. 2012, 22, 1659–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, J.F.; Li, C.Y.; Aroca, R.F. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3962–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pawar, S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Nag, A. Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence Study in Aqueous Medium by Coupling Gold Nanoparticles and Fluorophores Using a Bilayer Vesicle Platform. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 5983–5990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jeong, Y.; Kook, Y.M.; Lee, K.; Koh, W.G. Metal enhanced fluorescence (MEF) for biosensors: General approaches and a review of recent developments. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 111, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hlaing, M.; Gebear-Eigzabher, B.; Roa, A.; Marcano, A.; Radu, D.; Lai, C.Y. Absorption and scattering cross-section extinction values of silver nanoparticles. Opt. Mater. 2016, 58, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Knoblauch, R.; Geddes, C.D. Review of Advances in Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence. In Reviews in Plasmonics 2017; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 253–283. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Mali, B.L.; Geddes, C.D. Metal-enhanced fluorescence exciplex emission. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 85, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zenin, V.A.; Andryieuski, A.; Malureanu, R.; Radko, I.P.; Volkov, V.S.; Gramotnev, D.K.; Lavrinenko, A.V.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Boosting Local Field Enhancement by on-Chip Nanofocusing and Impedance-Matched Plasmonic Antennas. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8148–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Aslan, K.; Leonenko, Z.; Lakowicz, J.R.; Geddes, C.D. Annealed silver-island films for applications in metal-enhanced fluorescence: Interpretation in terms of radiating plasmons. J. Fluoresc. 2005, 15, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Abadeer, N.S.; Brennan, M.R.; Wilson, W.L.; Murphy, C.J. Distance and plasmon wavelength dependent fluorescence of molecules bound to silica-coated gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8392–8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mishra, H.; Zhang, Y.; Geddes, C.D. Metal enhanced fluorescence of the fluorescent brightening agent Tinopal-CBX near silver island film. Dye. Pigment. 2011, 91, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kinkhabwala, A.; Yu, Z.; Fan, S.; Avlasevich, Y.; Müllen, K.; Moerner, W.E. Large single-molecule fluorescence enhancements produced by a bowtie nanoantenna. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 654–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Govorov, A.; Hernández Martínez, P.L.; Demir, H.V. Förster-Type Nonradiative Energy Transfer Models. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jones, G.A.; Bradshaw, D.S. Resonance energy transfer: From fundamental theory to recent applications. Front. Phys. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Khurgin, J.B.; Sun, G. Enhancement of optical properties of nanoscaled objects by metal nanoparticles. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2009, 26, B83–B95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lakowicz, J.R.; Shen, Y.; D’Auria, S.; Malicka, J.; Fang, J.; Gryczynski, Z.; Gryczynski, I. Radiative decay engineering: 2. Effects of silver island films on fluorescence intensity, lifetimes, and resonance energy transfer. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 301, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lakowicz, J.R.; Malicka, J.; Gryczynski, I.; Gryczynski, Z.; Geddes, C.D. Radiative decay engineering: The role of photonic mode density in biotechnology. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2003, 36, R240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Anger, P.; Bharadwaj, P.; Novotny, L. Enhancement and quenching of single-molecule fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 113002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Bharadwaj, P.; Novotny, L. Spectral dependence of single molecule fluorescence enhancement. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 14266–14274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Vietz, C.; Lalkens, B.; Acuna, G.P.; Tinnefeld, P. Synergistic Combination of Unquenching and Plasmonic Fluorescence Enhancement in Fluorogenic Nucleic Acid Hybridization Probes. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 6496–6500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kang, K.A.; Wang, J.; Jasinski, J.B.; Achilefu, S. Fluorescence Manipulation by Gold Nanoparticles: From Complete Quenching to Extensive Enhancement. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Qin, H.; Ma, D.; Du, J. Distance dependent fluorescence quenching and enhancement of gold nanoclusters by gold nanoparticles. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 189, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, Y.; Munechika, K.; Ginger, D.S. Dependence of fluorescence intensity on the spectral overlap between fluorophores and plasmon resonant single silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 690–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jain, P.K.; Lee, K.S.; El-Sayed, I.H.; El-Sayed, M.A. Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: Applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 7238–7248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Liz-Marzán, L.M. Tailoring surface plasmons through the morphology and assembly of metal nanoparticles. Langmuir 2006, 22, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shabaninezhad, M.; Ramakrishna, G. Theoretical investigation of size, shape, and aspect ratio effect on the LSPR sensitivity of hollow-gold nanoshells. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 144116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Jin, R.; Cao, Y.C.; Hao, E.; Métraux, G.S.; Schatz, G.C.; Mirkin, C.A. Controlling anisotropic nanoparticle growth through plasmon excitation. Nature 2003, 425, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Glass, A.M.; Liao, P.F.; Bergman, J.G.; Olson, D.H. Interaction of metal particles with adsorbed dye molecules: Absorption and luminescence. Opt. Lett. 1980, 5, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Deng, W.; Goldys, E.M. Plasmonic approach to enhanced fluorescence for applications in biotechnology and the life sciences. Langmuir 2012, 28, 10152–10163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Szmacinski, H.; Toshchakov, V.; Piao, W.; Lakowicz, J.R. Imaging of Protein Secretion from a Single Cell Using Plasmonic Substrates. Bionanoscience 2013, 3, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Zhang, Y.; Aslan, K.; Previte, M.J.R.; Geddes, C.D. Metal-enhanced fluorescence from paper substrates: Modified spectral properties of dyes for potential high-throughput surface analysis and assays and as an anti-counterfeiting technology. Dye. Pigment. 2008, 77, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cui, Q.; He, F.; Li, L.; Möhwald, H. Controllable metal-enhanced fluorescence in organized films and colloidal system. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 207, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jung, D.W.; Kim, J.M.; Yun, H.J.; Yi, G.R.; Cho, J.Y.; Jung, H.; Lee, G.; Chae, W.S.; Nam, K.M. Understanding metal-enhanced fluorescence and structural properties in Au@Ag core-shell nanocubes. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 29232–29237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fayyaz, S.; Tabatabaei, M.; Hou, R.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Surface-enhanced fluorescence: Mapping individual hot spots in silica-protected 2D gold nanotriangle arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 11665–11670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Geddes, C.D.; Parfenov, A.; Roll, D.; Gryczynski, I.; Malicka, J.; Lakowicz, J.R. Silver Fractal-like Structures for Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence: Enhanced Fluorescence Intensities and Increased Probe Photostabilities. J. Fluoresc. 2003, 13, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Waxenegger, J.; Trügler, A.; Hohenester, U. Plasmonics simulations with the MNPBEM toolbox: Consideration of substrates and layer structures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015, 193, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Knoblauch, R.; Ben Hamo, H.; Marks, R.; Geddes, C.D. Spectral Distortions in Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence: Experimental Evidence for Ultra-Fast and Slow Transitions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 4723–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Asian, K.; Lakowicz, J.R.; Szmacinski, H.; Geddes, C.D. Metal-enhanced fluorescence solution-based sensing platform. J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 677–679. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Feng, A.L.; You, M.L.; Tian, L.; Singamaneni, S.; Liu, M.; Duan, Z.; Lu, T.J.; Xu, F.; Lin, M. Distance-dependent plasmon-enhanced fluorescence of upconversion nanoparticles using polyelectrolyte multilayers as tunable spacers. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Khatua, S.; Paulo, P.M.R.; Yuan, H.; Gupta, A.; Zijlstra, P.; Orrit, M. Resonant plasmonic enhancement of single-molecule fluorescence by individual gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4440–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Jang, E.; Son, K.J.; Koh, W.G. Metal-enhanced fluorescence using silver nanoparticles-embedded polyelectrolyte multilayer films for microarray-based immunoassays. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mei, Z.; Tang, L. Surface-Plasmon-Coupled Fluorescence Enhancement Based on Ordered Gold Nanorod Array Biochip for Ultrasensitive DNA Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, B.; Lu, N.; Qi, D.; Ma, R.; Wu, Q.; Hao, J.; Liu, X.; Mu, Y.; Reboud, V.; Kehagias, N.; et al. Tuning the Intensity of Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence by Engineering Silver Nanoparticle Arrays. Small 2010, 6, 1038–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Touahir, L.; Galopin, E.; Boukherroub, R.; Gouget-Laemmel, A.C.; Chazalviel, J.N.; Ozanam, F.; Szunerits, S. Localized surface plasmon-enhanced fluorescence spectroscopy for highly-sensitive real-time detection of DNA hybridization. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2579–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Guerrero, A.R.; Zhang, Y.; Aroca, R.F. Experimental confirmation of local field enhancement determining far-field measurements with shell-isolated silver nanoparticles. Small 2012, 8, 2964–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gabudean, A.M.; Focsan, M.; Astilean, S. Gold nanorods performing as dual-modal nanoprobes via metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 12240–12249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lakowicz, J.R. Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence from single fluorophores end-linked to gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5540–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Tserkezis, C.; Mortensen, N.A.; Wubs, M. How nonlocal damping reduces plasmon-enhanced fluorescence in ultranarrow gaps. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 85413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Sugawa, K.; Takeshima, N.; Uchida, K.; Tahara, H.; Jin, S.; Tsunenari, N.; Akiyama, T.; Kusaka, Y.; Fukuda, N.; Ushijima, H.; et al. Photocurrent enhancement of porphyrin molecules over a wide-wavelength region based on combined use of silver nanoprisms with different aspect ratios. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 11439–11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Peng, M.; Sun, F.; Na, N.; Ouyang, J. Target-Triggered Assembly of Nanogap Antennas to Enhance the Fluorescence of Single Molecules and Their Application in MicroRNA Detection. Small 2020, 16, 2000460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huang, P.H.; Hong, C.P.; Zhu, J.F.; Chen, T.T.; Chan, C.T.; Ko, Y.C.; Lin, T.L.; Pan, Z.B.; Sun, N.K.; Wang, Y.C.; et al. Ag@Au nanoprism-metal organic framework-based paper for extending the glucose sensing range in human serum and urine. Dalt. Trans. 2017, 46, 6985–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Luan, J.; Seth, A.; Gupta, R.; Wang, Z.; Rathi, P.; Cao, S.; Gholami Derami, H.; Tang, R.; Xu, B.; Achilefu, S.; et al. Ultrabright fluorescent nanoscale labels for the femtomolar detection of analytes with standard bioassays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 4, 518–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Yang, N.; Xia, J.; Li, L. Preparation of fluorescent nanocomposites based on gold nanoclusters self-assembly. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 548, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zaiba, S.; Lerouge, F.; Gabudean, A.M.; Focsan, M.; Lermé, J.; Gallavardin, T.; Maury, O.; Andraud, C.; Parola, S.; Baldeck, P.L. Transparent plasmonic nanocontainers protect organic fluorophores against photobleaching. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2043–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sun, B.; Wang, C.; Han, S.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L. Metal-enhanced fluorescence-based multilayer core-shell Ag-nanocube@SiO2@PMOs nanocomposite sensor for Cu2+ detection. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 61109–61118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dong, J.; Qu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Liu, G.; Yan, X.; Zheng, H. Surface enhanced fluorescence on three dimensional silver nanostructure substrate. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 093101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, D.D.; Zheng, B.; Song, C.Y.; Lin, Y.; Pang, D.W.; Tang, H.W. Metal-enhanced fluorescence of gold nanoclusters as a sensing platform for multi-component detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2019, 282, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zheng, M.; Kang, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, C.; Zheng, B.; Tang, H. Detection of ATP from “fluorescence” to “enhanced fluorescence” based on metal-enhanced fluorescence triggered by aptamer nanoswitch. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2020, 319, 128263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lee, D.; Lee, J.; Song, J.; Jen, M.; Pang, Y. Homogeneous silver colloidal substrates optimal for metal-enhanced fluorescence. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 11599–11607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Song, M.; Zhou, X.; He, X.; Cao, H.; Liu, J.; Qiu, H.; Jin, Z. Distance dependent fluorescence enhancement of silver nanowires deposited on AAO. Opt. Mater. 2018, 83, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sun, S.; Rasskazov, I.L.; Carney, P.S.; Zhang, T.; Moroz, A. Critical Role of Shell in Enhanced Fluorescence of Metal–Dielectric Core–Shell Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 13365–13373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Renier, A.; Mangeat, T.; Benalia, H.; Elie-Caille, C.; Pieralli, C.; Wacogne, B. Gold/silica thin film for biosensors applications: Metal enhanced fluorescence. Laser Phys. 2010, 20, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, S.; Huang, Z.; Jia, Q. Electrostatically confined in-situ preparation of stable glutathione-capped copper nanoclusters for fluorescence detection of lysozyme. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2020, 319, 128305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kim, J.K.; Jang, D.J. Metal-enhanced fluorescence of gold nanoclusters adsorbed onto Ag@SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 6037–6046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, J.; Fu, Y.; Jiang, F.; Lakowicz, J.R. Metal nanoshell-capsule for light-driven release of a small molecule. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 7653–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Luan, J.; Morrissey, J.J.; Wang, Z.; Derami, H.G.; Liu, K.K.; Cao, S.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, C.; Kharasch, E.D.; Naik, R.R.; et al. Add-on plasmonic patch as a universal fluorescence enhancer. Light Sci. Appl. 2018, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yang, X.; Zhu, S.; Dou, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Luo, Y.; Feng, Y. Novel and remarkable enhanced-fluorescence system based on gold nanoclusters for detection of tetracycline. Talanta 2014, 122, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ji, X.; Xiao, C.; Lau, W.F.; Li, J.; Fu, J. Metal enhanced fluorescence improved protein and DNA detection by zigzag Ag nanorod arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 82, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. He, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhao, Y. Oblique angle deposition and its applications in plasmonics. Front. Phys. 2014, 9, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ju, J.; Byeon, E.; Han, Y.A.; Kim, S.M. Fabrication of a substrate for Ag-nanorod metal-enhanced fluorescence using the oblique angle deposition process. Micro Nano Lett. 2013, 8, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Singh, D.P.; Kumar, S.; Singh, J.P. Morphology dependent surface enhanced fluorescence study on silver nanorod arrays fabricated by glancing angle deposition. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 31341–31346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, T.; Costan, J.; Centeno, A.; Pang, J.S.; Darvill, D.; Ryan, M.P.; Xie, F. Broadband enhanced fluorescence using zinc-oxide nanoflower arrays. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 2656–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, J.; Moraillon, A.; Siriwardena, A.; Boukherroub, R.; Ozanam, F.; Gouget-Laemmel, A.C.; Szunerits, S. Carbohydrate Microarray for the Detection of Glycan-Protein Interactions Using Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3721–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Karabchevsky, A.; Patzig, C.; Rauschenbach, B.; Abdulhalim, I. Microspot Surface Enhanced Fluorescence from Sculptured Thin Films for Control of Antibody Immobilization. In Proceedings of the Nanostructured Thin Films IV, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–25 August 2011; Martín-Palma, R.J., Jen, Y.-J., Mackay, T.G., Eds.; SPIE: Washinton, DC, USA, 2011; Volume 8104, p. 81040L. [Google Scholar]
  113. Xu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gartia, M.R.; Jiang, J.; Liu, G.L. Surface plasmon enhanced broadband spectrophotometry on black silver substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 241904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Loya, M.C.; Brammer, K.S.; Choi, C.; Chen, L.H.; Jin, S. Plasma-induced nanopillars on bare metal coronary stent surface for enhanced endothelialization. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6, 4589–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xiao, C.; Cao, Z.; Deng, J.; Huang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Fu, J.; Yobas, L. Microfluidic-Based Metal Enhanced Fluorescence for Capillary Electrophoresis by Ag Nanorod Arrays. Available online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-4484/25/22/225502 (accessed on 28 July 2020).
  116. Levene, H.J.; Korlach, J.; Turner, S.W.; Foquet, M.; Craighead, H.G.; Webb, W.W. Zero-mode waveguides for single-molecule analysis at high concentrations. Science 2003, 299, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Eid, J.; Fehr, A.; Gray, J.; Luong, K.; Lyle, J.; Otto, G.; Peluso, P.; Rank, D.; Baybayan, P.; Bettman, B.; et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 2009, 323, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ponzellini, P.; Zambrana-Puyalto, X.; Maccaferri, N.; Lanzanò, L.; De Angelis, F.; Garoli, D. Plasmonic zero mode waveguide for highly confined and enhanced fluorescence emission. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 17362–17369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Punj, D.; Mivelle, M.; Moparthi, S.B.; Van Zanten, T.S.; Rigneault, H.; Van Hulst, N.F.; García-Parajó, M.F.; Wenger, J. A plasmonic “antenna-in-box” platform for enhanced single-molecule analysis at micromolar concentrations. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Du, B.; Tang, C.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, H.; Yu, D.; Yu, M.; Balram, K.C.; Gersen, H.; Yang, B.; Cao, W.; et al. Diameter-optimized high-order waveguide nanorods for fluorescence enhancement applied in ultrasensitive bioassays. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 14322–14329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Zhang, W.; Ding, F.; Li, W.D.; Wang, Y.; Hu, J.; Chou, S.Y. Giant and uniform fluorescence enhancement over large areas using plasmonic nanodots in 3D resonant cavity nanoantenna by nanoimprinting. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 225301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhou, L.; Ding, F.; Chen, H.; Ding, W.; Zhang, W.; Chou, S.Y. Enhancement of immunoassay’s fluorescence and detection sensitivity using three-dimensional plasmonic nano-antenna-dots array. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4489–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Aouani, H.; Mahboub, O.; Bonod, N.; Devaux, E.; Popov, E.; Rigneault, H.; Ebbesen, T.W.; Wenger, J. Bright unidirectional fluorescence emission of molecules in a nanoaperture with plasmonic corrugations. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jiang, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Weng, H.; Gao, B.R.; Hao, Y.W.; Jin, Y.; Chen, Q.D.; Sun, H.B. Surface plasmon enhanced fluorescence of dye molecules on metal grating films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 12636–12642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pale, V.; Kauppinen, C.; Selin, J.; Sopanen, M.; Tittonen, I. Fluorescence-enhancing plasmonic silver nanostructures using azopolymer lithography. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48129–48136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yoo, H.W.; Jung, J.M.; Lee, S.K.; Jung, H.T. The fabrication of highly ordered silver nanodot patterns by platinum assisted nanoimprint lithography. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 095304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wood, A.; Grant, S.; Basuray, S.; Pathak, A.; Bok, S.; Mathai, C.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Gangopadhyay, S. Enhanced Fluorescence Through the Incorporation of Nanocones/Gaps into a Plasmonic Gratings Sensor Platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Valencia, Spain, 2–5 November 2014; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1479–1482. [Google Scholar]
  128. Wood, A.J.; Chen, B.; Pathan, S.; Bok, S.; Mathai, C.J.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Grant, S.A.; Gangopadhyay, S. Influence of silver grain size, roughness, and profile on the extraordinary fluorescence enhancement capabilities of grating coupled surface plasmon resonance. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 78534–78544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tawa, K.; Nakayama, T.; Kintaka, K. Optimal structure of a plasmonic chip for sensitive bio-detection with the grating-coupled surface plasmon-field enhanced fluorescence (GC-SPF). Materials 2017, 10, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zang, F.; Su, Z.; Zhou, L.; Konduru, K.; Kaplan, G.; Chou, S.Y. Ultrasensitive Ebola Virus Antigen Sensing via 3D Nanoantenna Arrays. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Chang, Y.F.; Wang, S.F.; Huang, J.C.; Su, L.C.; Yao, L.; Li, Y.C.; Wu, S.C.; Chen, Y.M.A.; Hsieh, J.P.; Chou, C. Detection of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viruses using a localized surface plasmon coupled fluorescence fiber-optic biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 1068–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Oubaha, M.; Gorin, A.; McDonagh, C.; Duffy, B.; Copperwhite, R. Development of a multianalyte optical sol-gel biosensor for medical diagnostic. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Deng, Y.-L.; Xu, D.-D.; Pang, D.-W.; Tang, H.-W. Target-triggered signal turn-on detection of prostate specific antigen based on metal-enhanced fluorescence of Ag@SiO2@SiO2-RuBpy composite nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 065501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Huang, J.C.; Chang, Y.F.; Chen, K.H.; Su, L.C.; Lee, C.W.; Chen, C.C.; Chen, Y.M.A.; Chou, C. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in human serum using a localized surface plasmon coupled fluorescence fiber-optic biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 25, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Abbas, N.; Lu, X.; Badshah, M.A.; In, J.B.; Heo, W.I.; Park, K.Y.; Lee, M.-K.; Kim, C.H.; Kang, P.; Chang, W.-J.; et al. Development of a Protein Microarray Chip with Enhanced Fluorescence for Identification of Semen and Vaginal Fluid. Sensors 2018, 18, 3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Ganguli, A.; Mostafa, A.; Berger, J.; Aydin, M.; Sun, F.; Valera, E.; Cunningham, B.T.; King, W.P.; Bashir, R. Rapid Isothermal Amplification and Portable Detection System for SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Della Ventura, B.; Gelzo, M.; Battista, E.; Alabastri, A.; Schirato, A.; Castaldo, G.; Corso, G.; Gentile, F.; Velotta, R. Biosensor for Point-of-Care Analysis of Immunoglobulins in Urine by Metal Enhanced Fluorescence from Gold Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 3753–3762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lucas, E.; Knoblauch, R.; Combs-Bosse, M.; Broedel, S.E.; Geddes, C.D. Low-concentration trypsin detection from a metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) platform: Towards the development of ultra-sensitive and rapid detection of proteolytic enzymes. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 228, 117739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lee, W.I.; Shrivastava, S.; Duy, L.T.; Yeong Kim, B.; Son, Y.M.; Lee, N.E. A smartphone imaging-based label-free and dual-wavelength fluorescent biosensor with high sensitivity and accuracy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Narasimhan, V.; Siddique, R.H.; Hoffmann, M.; Kumar, S.; Choo, H. Enhanced broadband fluorescence detection of nucleic acids using multipolar gap-plasmons on biomimetic Au metasurfaces. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 13750–13757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Jang, E.; Kim, M.; Koh, W.-G. Ag@SiO2-entrapped hydrogel microarray: A new platform for a metal-enhanced fluorescence-based protein assay. Analyst 2015, 140, 3375–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Pang, Y.; Rong, Z.; Xiao, R.; Wang, S. “Turn on” and label-free core−shell Ag@SiO2 nanoparticles-based metal-enhanced fluorescent (MEF) aptasensor for Hg2+. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Kim, M.; Kwon, J.E.; Lee, K.; Koh, W.-G. Signal-amplifying nanoparticle/hydrogel hybrid microarray biosensor for metal-enhanced fluorescence detection of organophosphorus compounds. Biofabrication 2018, 10, 35002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Tawa, K.; Yokota, Y.; Kintaka, K.; Nishii, J.; Nakaoki, T. An application of a plasmonic chip with enhanced fluorescence to a simple biosensor with extended dynamic range. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, Q.; Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, R.; Yuan, Q. Highly Sensitive Detection of Bladder Cancer-Related miRNA in Urine Using Time-Gated Luminescent Biochip. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2124–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Hawa, G.; Sonnleitner, L.; Missbichler, A.; Prinz, A.; Bauer, G.; Mauracher, C. Single step, direct fluorescence immunoassays based on metal enhanced fluorescence (MEF-FIA) applicable as micro plate-, array-, multiplexing- or point of care-format. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 549, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g001 550
Figure 1. Metal enhanced fluorescence mechanism: (a) the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect on metallic structures, (b) the plasmon coupling effect due to non-radiative interactions, modified from [47], (c) the intrinsic radiative decay effect, modified from [47], (d) fluorescence enhancement as a function of the bowtie structures gap size (adapted with permission from [50]), and (e) fluorescence enhancement (emissions, absorption, and total enhancement) as a function of the structure radius (adapted with permission from [53], Copyright 2009, Optical Society of America).
Figure 1. Metal enhanced fluorescence mechanism: (a) the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect on metallic structures, (b) the plasmon coupling effect due to non-radiative interactions, modified from [47], (c) the intrinsic radiative decay effect, modified from [47], (d) fluorescence enhancement as a function of the bowtie structures gap size (adapted with permission from [50]), and (e) fluorescence enhancement (emissions, absorption, and total enhancement) as a function of the structure radius (adapted with permission from [53], Copyright 2009, Optical Society of America).
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g001
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g002 550
Figure 2. An ordered copper (Cu) nanosphere array along with the MEF enhancement factor (adapted with permission from Reference [13]).
Figure 2. An ordered copper (Cu) nanosphere array along with the MEF enhancement factor (adapted with permission from Reference [13]).
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g002
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g003 550
Figure 3. An illustration of the plasmon coupling and MEF enhancement due to end-to-end coupling and the distance effect (adapted with permission from Reference [88]).
Figure 3. An illustration of the plasmon coupling and MEF enhancement due to end-to-end coupling and the distance effect (adapted with permission from Reference [88]).
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g003
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g004 550
Figure 4. Examples of the MEF substrate fabricated by deposition methods: (a) a zigzag nanorods MEF array, and (b) a vertical nanorods MEF array. Adapted with permission from references [22,106].
Figure 4. Examples of the MEF substrate fabricated by deposition methods: (a) a zigzag nanorods MEF array, and (b) a vertical nanorods MEF array. Adapted with permission from references [22,106].
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g004
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g005 550
Figure 5. Examples of MEF substrate fabricated by nanoimprint lithography: (a) a plasmonic nano-lens array, and (b) a disk-coupled dots-on-pillar antenna-array (D2PA) for MEF. Adapted with permission from references [30,122].
Figure 5. Examples of MEF substrate fabricated by nanoimprint lithography: (a) a plasmonic nano-lens array, and (b) a disk-coupled dots-on-pillar antenna-array (D2PA) for MEF. Adapted with permission from references [30,122].
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g005
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g006 550
Figure 6. A qualitative comparison of characteristics belonging to different methods for fabricating the nanostructures.
Figure 6. A qualitative comparison of characteristics belonging to different methods for fabricating the nanostructures.
Nanomaterials 10 01749 g006
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of various metals used for metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) applications.
Table 1. Characteristics of various metals used for metal-enhanced fluorescence (MEF) applications.
MetalsPlasmonic CharacteristicsChemical ReactivityReference
UVVISNIRIBQ Factor
Silver (Ag) -- HighBiocompatible; easily oxidized[12]
Copper (Cu) -
<600 nm		LowEasily oxidized[13,16]
Gold (Au) ---
<500 nm		HighBiocompatible; Stable[18,19]
Aluminium (Al)-- LowStable after surface passivation[17]
Palladium (Pd) - LowStable[14,15]
Platinum (Pt) - LowStable[15]
UV: ultraviolet; VIS: visible, NIR: near-infrared; IB: inter-band; Q factor: quality factor.
Table
Table 3. Summary of various nanostructures fabricated via various deposition methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
Table 3. Summary of various nanostructures fabricated via various deposition methods with different shapes and geometries, and their experimentally determined enhancement factor (EF), with feature size, excitation wavelengths, used fluorophores, and publication information such as year and reference, for further reading.
MaterialConfiguration of StructuresStructures Feature Size (nm)Wavelength λ (nm)FluorophoreEFYearRef.
CuStructured thin-film nanorodsHeight: 550 nm590 nmRhodamine 123022012[17]
AuStructured thin-film nanorodsDia: 40 nm
Height: 285 nm		590 nmRhodamine 1233.92012[17]
ZnoVertical nanorodsDia: 83.2 nm
Height: 170 nm		645 nmAlexa Fluor 6475.72015[110]
AuNanorodsDia: 30 nm
Height: 13 nm		650 nmAlexa 647102015[111]
AgStructured thin-film nanorodsDia: 75 nm
Height: 400 nm		590 nmRhodamine 123202011[112]
AgSlanted nanorodsHeight: 1000 nm635 nmCy5232013[108]
AgStructured thin-film nanorodsDia: 75 nm
Height: 400 nm		590 nmRhodamine 123232012[17]
ZnOFlower shape nanorodsDia: 718.5 nm
Height: 200 nm		515 nmAlexa Fluor 532252015[110]
AgZigzag nanorodsHeight: 2000 nm525 nmAlexa 488282016[106]
AgNanoconeDiabase: 180 nm
Height: 500 nm		528 nmRhodamine 6G302011[113]
AgSlanted nanorodsLength: 635 nm555 nmRhodamine 6G322015[109]
AlStructured thin-film nanorodsDia: 30 nm
Height: 1000 nm		590 nmRhodamine 123372012[17]
ZnoFlower shape nanorodsDia: 718.5 nm
Height: 200 nm		645 nmAlexa Fluor 647452015[110]
AgStructured thin-film nanorodsDia: 75 nm
Height: 400 nm		590 nmRhodamine 123712012[17]
AgSlanted nanorodsDia: 220 nm
Height: 3000 nm		-Bovine aortic endothelial cell-2010[114]
AgVertical nanorods structuresDia: 120 nm
Height: 500 nm		635 nmCy52002018[22]
AgnanorodsDia: 89 nm
Height: 3000 nm		520 nmfluorescein-5-isothiocyanate4942014[115]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Badshah, M.A.; Koh, N.Y.; Zia, A.W.; Abbas, N.; Zahra, Z.; Saleem, M.W. Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091749

AMA Style

Badshah MA, Koh NY, Zia AW, Abbas N, Zahra Z, Saleem MW. Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(9):1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Badshah, Mohsin Ali, Na Yoon Koh, Abdul Wasy Zia, Naseem Abbas, Zahra Zahra, and Muhammad Wajid Saleem. 2020. "Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing" Nanomaterials 10, no. 9: 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091749

APA Style

Badshah, M. A., Koh, N. Y., Zia, A. W., Abbas, N., Zahra, Z., & Saleem, M. W. (2020). Recent Developments in Plasmonic Nanostructures for Metal Enhanced Fluorescence-Based Biosensing. Nanomaterials, 10(9), 1749. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop