Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of SDS-Modified Pt/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposite Catalysts and Electrochemical Performance for Ethanol Oxidation
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in Laser Drilling of Structural Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Growth Study of Hierarchical Pore SSZ-13 Molecular Sieves with Improved CO2 Adsorption Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Properties of the Densely Packed Ultra-Long Ni Nanowires Encapsulated in Alumina Membrane
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Effect of Doping ZrO2 Ceramics with MgO to Increase the Resistance to Polymorphic Transformations under the Action of Irradiation

by
Alisher E. Kurakhmedov
1,
Mahambet Alin
2,
Adilet M. Temir
1,2,
Igor A. Ivanov
1,2,
Yeugeniy V. Bikhert
1,
Yerulan O. Ungarbayev
1,
Maxim V. Zdorovets
1,2,3 and
Artem L. Kozlovskiy
1,4,*
1
Laboratory of Solid State Physics, The Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
2
Engineering Profile Laboratory, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan 010008, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Intelligent Information Technologies, Ural Federal University, 620075 Yekaterinburg, Russia
4
Institute of Geology and Oil and Gas Business, Satbayev University, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(12), 3172; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123172
Submission received: 6 November 2021 / Revised: 19 November 2021 / Accepted: 21 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Ceramics in Modern Materials Science)

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of doping ZrO2 ceramics with MgO on radiation swelling and polymorphic transformations, as a result of irradiation with heavy ions. Interest in these types of materials is due to the great prospects for their use as structural materials for new-generation reactors. The study established the dependences of the phase composition formation and changes in the structural parameters following a change in the concentration of MgO. It has been established that the main mechanism for changing the structural properties of ceramics is the displacement of the cubic c-ZrO2 phase by the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 substitution phase, which leads to an increase in the stability of ceramic properties to irradiation. It has been determined that an increase in MgO concentration leads to the formation of an impurity phase Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 due to the type of substitution, resulting in changes to the structural parameters of ceramics. During studies of changes in the strength properties of irradiated ceramics, it was found that the formation of a phase in the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 structure leads to an increase in the resistance to cracking and embrittlement of the surface layers of ceramics.

1. Introduction

In light of the latest world trends in energy development, increasing attention is paid to nuclear and atomic energy in view of their potential use not only as a basis for energy production but also—in the case of nuclear reactors—hydrogen production [1,2,3]. In this regard, research into new types of structural materials for the high-temperature nuclear reactors of a new generation deserve special attention. The most important requirements for new types of structural materials for Gen IV reactors include high melting points, thermal conductivity, resistance to radiation damage, etc. [4,5,6]. According to the shortlist for the EUROfusion project, alternatives to traditional steels and alloys that meet all of the above requirements are ceramic materials based on oxides (ZrO2, BeO, MgO) [7,8,9,10], nitrides (AlN, Si3N4) [11,12,13], and carbides (SiC, TaC) [14,15]. Among the various types of ceramics, oxide ceramics ZrO2, BeO have recently been recognized. With a small value of the thermal neutron capture cross section, good corrosion and degradation resistance, as well as excellent strength and hardness indicators, there are broad prospects for their use as the structural materials of a new generation [16,17,18,19,20].
Interest in ZrO2 ceramics is also due to the fact that, when used as materials for fuel assemblies (FAs), ceramics create an additional protective barrier for oxygen and hydrogen penetration from the coolant, thereby reducing the rate of FA degradation. However, a number of studies show that in ZrO2 ceramics, under the action of irradiation with heavy ions of Kr, Xe at high irradiation fluences, polymorphic transformations of the t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 type occur, caused by the processes of radiation damage [21,22,23]. Such transformations can have a negative impact on resistance to degradation, hydrogen absorption, and swelling of ceramics as a result of long-term operation. The mechanisms of polymorphic transformations are primarily associated with local thermal effects arising from the interaction of ions with the irradiated material, and the subsequent transformation of the ion’s kinetic energy into thermal energy. As a result of such interactions, nonequilibrium regions appear in the structure, leading to phase transformations. Moreover, as shown in [21,22], the degree of polymorphic transformation depends largely on the energy and types of ion with which the interaction occurs.
One way to increase resistance to the polymorphic transformations of oxide and nitride ceramics is to introduce various stabilizers into their structure, which, due to their properties, can interfere with these processes [24,25]. The most common stabilizing additives are Y2O3, MgO and Al2O3, which, when added in small amounts, lead to significant changes in the properties of ceramics [26,27,28,29,30].
Based on the above, the aim of this work is to study the effect of MgO addition at concentrations of 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mol.% during sintering of ZrO2 ceramics on the increase in resistance to polymorphic transformations t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 under the action of irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

The samples for the study were ZrO2 ceramics doped with MgO. Preparation of the samples consisted of weighing the initial powders of ZrO2 and MgO in specified molar ratios and grinding them in a planetary mill for 1 h at a grinding speed of 400 rpm. After grinding, the samples were sintered at a temperature of 1100 °C for 5 h and then pressed into tablets with a diameter of 5 mm and a thickness of 200 μm.
The concentrations of the MgO dopant were 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mol.%; these values were chosen with a view to studying the effect of additives on changes in structural and strength properties. Micron-sized ZrO2 and MgO powders manufactured by Sigma Aldrich (Sigma Ltd., Saint Louis, MO, USA) were used as starting reagents; the chemical purity was 99.95%.
Assessment of the resistance of samples to radiation damage was carried out by irradiating them with heavy Xe22+ ions with an energy of 230 MeV and fluences of 1012–1015 ion/cm2. Irradiation was carried out at room temperature, with the ion flux at 109 ion/cm2*s, and the beam current was 100 nA. The ion type and energy values were chosen with a view to simulating radiation damage, comparable to the damage arising from irradiation with uranium fission fragments in reactor tests. The values for irradiation fluences were chosen with a view to simulating defects, both in the case of single defects and in the overlap of defect regions formed by the passage of ions in the ceramic material. According to the calculated data, the energy losses of incident Xe22+ ions are dE/dxelectron = 24,700 keV/μm, dE/dxnuclear = 86.5 keV/μm, and the ion path length is more than 14 μm.
The study of the kinetics of polymorphic transformations as a result of irradiation and subsequent changes in structural parameters was carried out using data obtained from X-ray diffraction. The data acquisition was carried out on a D8 Advance ECO X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Mannheim, Germany). Diffraction patterns were recorded using Cu-kα X-rays with a wavelength of 1.54 Å, with the Bragg–Brentano geometry in the angular range of 2θ = 25–75°, and a step of 0.03°. The crystal lattice parameters were determined and refined using the DiffracEVA v. 4.2 program code (Bruker, Mannheim, Germany), which is based on refinement of the parameters of the full-profile analysis methods.
To determine the phase composition, the PDF-2(2016) database was used. The phase ratio was determined using the formula V admixture = R I phase I admixture   +   R I p h a s e , where Iphase and Iadmixture are the intensities of the reflections of the dominant and impurity phases, and R = 1.45 is the structural parameter [31].
Structural deformation was evaluated by comparing changes in crystal lattice parameters depending on the types of external effects.
The swelling of the crystal structure was established by determining the value of ΔV/V—the change in the volume of the crystal lattice depending on the types of external effects.
Determination of strength properties was carried out by evaluating changes in the hardness of the ceramics before and after irradiation, as well as by calculating the degree of softening and degradation of the near-surface layer, depending on the irradiation fluence. The hardness was determined by an indentation method using a Vickers diamond pyramid at an indenter load of 500 N. The destruction degree was determined by calculating the ratio of hardness readings in the initial and irradiated states.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the results of X-ray analysis of the samples under study, depending on the concentration of the dopant after thermal sintering. An initial sample without the addition of the dopant MgO, milled under the same conditions and subjected to thermal annealing, was chosen as a reference sample. According to the full-profile analysis data, in the initial state, the samples are a mixture of two phases, tetragonal (t-ZrO2) and cubic (c-ZrO2), the content of which is t-ZrO2/c-ZrO2~85/15. This phase composition is due to the conditions for obtaining ceramics and is a result of mechanochemical treatment and subsequent thermal sintering. The addition of the MgO dopant at a concentration of 0.05 mol.% does not lead to the formation of new reflections, which indicates the absence of phase transformation processes and the formation of substitution or interstitial phases. However, in the case of an increase in concentration to 0.10 mol.% and higher, the general broadening of the main reflections can be described by three sets of functions, with maxima related to the t-ZrO2 and c-ZrO2 phases, and maxima characteristic of the cubic substitutional phase of Zr0.9Mg0.1O2. Evaluation of the contributions of these phases to the composition of ceramics showed that the content of this phase is 3–5%, while partially replacing the c-ZrO2 phase. The formation of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase with an increase in dopant concentration is due to the substitution of magnesium atoms with zirconium atoms, followed by the formation of a cubic lattice. Thus, from the obtained X-ray phase analysis data, it can be concluded that when the dopant MgO is added with a concentration of more than 0.10 mol.%, under the selected synthesis conditions, a stable substitution phase is formed with a subsequent increase in its content. However, when analyzing the diffraction pattern of a sample with an MgO dopant content of 0.15 mol.%, it was found that an increase in the content of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase leads to a strong deformation of the peaks, which is characteristic of distortions of interplanar spacings and distortion of the crystal lattice.
Figure 2 shows the results of changes in the crystal lattice parameters depending on the concentration of the MgO dopant. According to the data obtained, an increase in dopant concentration from 0.05 to 0.10 mol.% leads to a decrease in crystal lattice parameters. This behavior of changes in parameters can be caused by partial substitution of a Zr atom with Mg atoms, which leads to a decrease in the cell size, as well as the formation of an impurity substitution phase. At the same time, the change in the lattice parameter c is more pronounced than the lattice parameter a. However, an increase in the MgO concentration to 0.15 mol.% leads to an increase in the crystal lattice parameters; this may be associated with an increase in the contribution of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase, which leads to deformation of the structure.
Analysis of the dependences Δa/a and Δc/c presented in Figure 2b reflect the deformation of compression or expansion of the lattice, depending on external factors. As seen in the data obtained, a change in the phase composition leads to an ordering of the crystal lattice and a decrease in tensile strain. However, an increase in the contribution of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase at a dopant concentration of 0.15 mol.% leads to the appearance of additional distortions of the structure, which negatively affects the changes in the crystal lattice.
One of the features of ZrO2 ceramics in the tetragonal phase is its instability as a result of external influences associated with the occurrence of thermal heating or deformation of the structure. This instability is expressed in a polymorphic transformation of the t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 type, accompanied by changes in the strength and structural properties of ceramics. As shown in [21,22], one of the mechanisms of polymorphic transformations is the thermal effect, arising from the transition of incident ions’ kinetic energy into thermal energy, as a result of energy loss along their trajectory in the material. At the same time, there is an increase in the irradiation fluence, followed by an increase in the effect of overlapping defect regions, which arise as a result of the overlapping trajectories of ions in the material; this leads to an increase in the thermal effect, which causes the transformation of the t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 structure. The result of this enhancement was the complete transformation t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2, with a subsequent deterioration in the structural and strength properties of ceramics. Moreover, as shown in [21,22], there is a direct dependence of the degree of polymorphic transformations not only on the irradiation fluence but also on the types of ion and their energy.
One method of controlling this effect in oxide ceramics is the use of dopants, the main role of which is to stabilize the structure and inhibit the mechanisms of polymorphic transformations. The basis of the braking mechanisms is the assumption that the introduction of a dopant with the subsequent substitution of zirconium atoms in the lattice nodes, as well as the formation of substitution phases, can lead to the creation of additional barriers and drains of defects.
Figure 3 below shows the results of changes in the phase composition of the studied ceramics depending on the irradiation fluence, as well as the concentration of the dopant in the structure. In the case of initial, undoped ceramics, the dynamics of changes in the phase composition as a result of polymorphic transformations t-ZrO2 → c-ZrO2 are in good agreement with the results of studies performed on commercial ceramics [21,22]. In this case, the main process of polymorphic transformations, followed by the dominance of the c-ZrO2 phase, occurs at an irradiation fluence above 1013 ion/cm2; this is typical for the appearance of overlapping defect regions and, consequently, an increase in distorting stresses, as well as the thermal effect during irradiation.
In the case of doped ceramics, the effect of polymorphic transformation as a result of irradiation is less pronounced. Thus, at a dopant concentration of 0.05 mol.%, an increase in the irradiation fluence above 1013 ion/cm2 leads to an increase in the contribution of the c-ZrO2 phase, but the t-ZrO2 phase remains dominant. The formation of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase in the ceramic structure, as seen in Figure 3c, leads to a decrease in the mechanism of polymorphic transformations and an insignificant decrease in the t-ZrO2 phase. It should be noted that at an irradiation fluence of 1014–1015 ion/cm2, there is an insignificant increase in the contribution of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase, which inhibits polymorphic transformation of the t-ZrO2  c-ZrO2 type.
At the same time, the presence of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase in the initial composition with a content of more than 5% leads to the destabilization of the ceramic structure and the acceleration of the process of polymorphic transformations at high irradiation fluences.
The change in structural parameters as a result of phase polymorphic transformations is primarily associated with the deformational nature of the distortions, as well as swelling of the crystal structure. The results of assessing the degree of swelling, as well as the effect of doping on swelling resistance, are shown in Figure 4. As seen in the data presented, the greatest swelling of the crystal structure is observed in the case of undoped ceramics and at the maximum irradiation fluence is more than 7.5%. This behavior of the crystal lattice is primarily due to structural distortions resulting from polymorphic transformations, as well as the accumulation of radiation damage as a result of irradiation. Doping of ceramics leads to a more than twofold decrease in the degree of swelling at a dopant concentration of 0.05 mol.%, decreasing by a further 2.7–3.7% when the impurity phase Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 is formed in the structure, which reduces the degree of polymorphic transformations.
One of the important indicators of resistance to external influences—in particular, irradiation with heavy ions and subsequent accumulation of radiation damage—is the preservation of the strength properties of oxide ceramics. This is because the mechanical properties are very sensitive to radiation defects [32,33]. In this case, the presence in the structure of various point defects, dislocations and interstitial defects can serve as additional obstacles to the accumulation and agglomeration of radiation-induced defects in the structure, leading to softening of the surface layer of ceramics. Unlike nitride ceramics or spinel-type ceramics, ZrO2 ceramics are highly resistant to amorphization as a result of irradiation, which leads to fewer changes in strength properties. In this case, the formation of an impurity substitutional phase in the structure, which leads to a decrease in the degree of polymorphic transformations, as well as to a decrease in the degree of swelling of the crystal lattice, can also have a positive effect on the resistance to softening of the damaged layers of ceramics.
Figure 5 shows the results of changing the strength characteristics—in particular, the hardness and degradation degree—depending on irradiation fluence. According to the data obtained, doping leads to an increase in hardness of the initial samples by 1.1–2.4%, depending on the MgO concentration. This increase is due to a change in the structural parameters and an increase in the density of ceramics.
For irradiated samples without doping, the change in hardness values can be divided into two stages, characterized by a different degree of degradation and a decrease in hardness. The first stage is typical for irradiation fluences of 1012–1014 ion/cm2, for which the decrease in hardness values can be described by a linear dependence. As shown in the data presented, in the case of undoped ceramics, for which the degree of polymorphic transformations is maximum at an irradiation fluence of 1013 ion/cm2, a sharp decrease in strength is observed. Furthermore, there is an increase in the damaged layer softening degree above 15%, with an increase in irradiation fluence observed. At the same time, an increase in the irradiation fluence up to 1015 ion/cm2 leads to a sharp deterioration in hardness indicators, and the degradation degree is more than 23%.
The addition of a dopant and the subsequent formation of the Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase, which leads to a decrease in the degree of polymorphic transformations, results in a lower softening degree and an increase in resistance to hardness degradation. At the same time, for irradiation fluences of 1012–1013 ion/cm2, the decrease in hardness is no more than 3–4%. An increase in irradiation fluence to 1014–1015 ion/cm2 leads to an increase in disordering degree to 12–15%, while for the original undoped ceramics, the maximum disordering degree for this fluence was more than 20%.
Figure 6 shows the results of morphological studies of ceramics after irradiation with the maximum irradiation fluence, to determine the degradation degree of the near-surface layer.
As seen in the data presented, an increase in the dopant concentration leads to an enlargement of grains and an increase in the homogeneity degree of their sizes. At the same time, in the case of the initial samples irradiated with a fluence of 1015 ion/cm2, delamination and the formation of microcracks and pores are observed in the near-surface layer; this indicates a high concentration of overstresses and deformations, leading to cracking and a decrease in the strength and crack resistance of ceramics. In turn, doping leads to an increase in stability, as well as a decrease in microcracks. It should be noted that at a dopant concentration of 0.10 mol.%, the formation of microcracks and pores is not observed in the near-surface layer, which indicates a high resistance of ceramics to irradiation and degradation.
In general, it can be noted that, according to the data obtained, the doping of ZrO2 ceramics with MgO at a concentration of 0.05–0.10 mol.% leads to an increase in radiation resistance due to the formation of a substitution phase. The presence of this phase leads not only to an increase in radiation resistance, but also to the formation of defect regions in the structure. As is known, in the case of irradiation with heavy ions or neutron radiation, the main factor affecting the decrease in strength properties are point defects, the concentration of which increases with the radiation dose. At the same time, one of the factors for restraining the decrease in strength properties is the use of various dopants [34,35], which make it possible to reduce the rate of migration of point defects along the structure by changing the dislocation density or additional grain boundaries.

4. Conclusions

As a result of this study, it was found that the formation of Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 impurity phase in the structure of ZrO2 ceramics leads not only to a decrease in the degree of polymorphic transformations but also to an increase in resistance to radiation damage and a decrease in strength properties.
During determination of the most effective dopant concentration, it was found that the addition of MgO with a content of 0.10 mol.% is the most optimal concentration, leading to the formation of Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase, the content of which does not exceed 3–4%. At the same time, an increase in Zr0.9Mg0.1O2 phase in the structure of the initial ceramics leads to the appearance of additional distortions and tensile stresses in the crystal lattice, which have a negative effect on the change in the structure as a result of accumulation of radiation defects.
The results obtained indicate that the addition of MgO in concentrations of 0.05–0.10 mol.% significantly increases the resistance of ZrO2 ceramics to radiation damage and subsequent polymorphic transformations, thereby increasing the stability and radiation resistance of ceramics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.K., M.V.Z. and A.E.K.; methodology, Y.V.B., M.A.; software, A.L.K.; validation, Y.O.U., A.L.K., M.A.; formal analysis, A.E.K., A.M.T., I.A.I.; investigation, A.E.K., A.M.T., I.A.I.; resources, A.L.K., M.V.Z.; data curation, Y.O.U.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.K., M.V.Z.; writing—review and editing, A.L.K., M.V.Z.; visualization, A.L.K.; supervision, A.L.K.; project administration, A.L.K.; funding acquisition, M.V.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (No. AP09259476).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, H.; Wu, L. Forecasting the non-renewable energy consumption by an adjacent accumulation grey model. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 124113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ding, S.; Tao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y. Forecasting nuclear energy consumption in China and America: An optimized structure-adaptative grey model. Energy 2022, 239, 121928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vo, D.H.; Vo, A.T.; Ho, C.M.; Nguyen, H.M. The role of renewable energy, alternative and nuclear energy in mitigating carbon emissions in the CPTPP countries. Renew. Energy 2020, 161, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ingersoll, D.T.; Carelli, M.D. (Eds.) Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors; Woodhead Publishing: Soston, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lobach, K.V.; Kuprin, O.S.; Sayenko, S.Y.; Voyevodin, V.M.; Kolodiy, I.V. Research and Development of Novel Materials for Accident Tolerant Fuel Cladding of Nuclear Reactors. East Eur. J. Phys. 2020, 4, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kadyrzhanov, K.K.; Tinishbaeva, K.; Uglov, V.V. Investigation of the effect of exposure to heavy Xe22+ ions on the mechanical properties of carbide ceramics. Eurasian Phys. Tech. J. 2020, 17, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khafizov, M.; Pakarinen, J.; He, L.; Hurley, D.H. Impact of irradiation induced dislocation loops on thermal conductivity in ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 7533–7542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trukhanov, A.V.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Ryskulov, A.E.; Uglov, V.V.; Kislitsin, S.B.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Tishkevich, D.I. Control of structural parameters and thermal conductivity of BeO ceramics using heavy ion irradiation and post-radiation annealing. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15412–15416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Averback, R.S.; Ehrhart, P.; Popov, A.I.; Sambeek, A.V. Defects in ion implanted and electron irradiated MgO and Al2O3. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 1995, 136, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kotomin, E.A.; Kuzovkov, V.N.; Popov, A.I.; Vila, R. Kinetics of F center annealing and colloid formation in Al2O3. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2016, 374, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khafizov, M.; Pakarinen, J.; He, L.; Hurley, D.H. Study of the radiation disordering mechanisms of AlN ceramic structure as a result of helium swelling. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 21658–21669. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ahmad, S.A.; Husnain, G.; Ajmal, M.; Song, P. Irradiation with phosphorus ions modifies the structure and tunable band-gap of a hexagonal AlN thin film. Appl. Phys. A 2021, 127, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gnesin, G.G. Development of nonoxide ceramics based on silicon carbide and nitride. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 1996, 34, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Talmy, I.G.; Zaykoski, J.A.; Opeka, M.M. Synthesis, processing and properties of TaC–TaB2–C ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2253–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, X.; Hilmas, G.E.; Fahrenholtz, W.G. Densification and mechanical properties of TaC-based ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 501, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, K.; He, R.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, R.; Pei, Y.; Fang, D. Fabrication and mechanical properties of lightweight ZrO2 ceramic corrugated core sandwich panels. Mater. Des. 2014, 64, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Altunal, V.; Guckan, V.; Ozdemir, A.; Kurt, K.; Ekicibil, A.; Yegingil, Z. Investigation of luminescence properties of BeO ceramics doped with metals for medical dosimetry. Opt. Mater. 2020, 108, 110436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ionescu, E.; Linck, C.; Fasel, C.; Müller, M.; Kleebe, H.J.; Riedel, R. Polymer-derived SiOC/ZrO2 ceramic nanocomposites with excellent high-temperature stability. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, Z.; Zeng, X.M.; Liu, Q.; Lai, A.; Amini, S.; Miserez, A.; Gan, C.L. Size effects and shape memory properties in ZrO2 ceramic micro-and nano-pillars. Scr. Mater. 2015, 101, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, T.; Chai, J.; Niu, L.; Li, S.; Wang, Z. Irradiation response of Al2O3-ZrO2 ceramic composite under He ion irradiation. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 2883–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ivanov, I.A.; Alin, M.; Koloberdin, M.V.; Sapar, A.; Kurakhmedov, A.E.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Uglov, V.V. Effect of irradiation with heavy Xe22+ ions with energies of 165–230 MeV on change in optical characteristics of ZrO2 ceramic. Opt. Mater. 2021, 120, 111479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alin, M.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Uglov, V.V. Comprehensive study of changes in the optical, structural and strength properties of ZrO2 ceramics as a result of phase transformations caused by irradiation with heavy ions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 17810–17821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alin, M.; Kozlovskiy, A.L. Study of structural changes in ZrO2 ceramics irradiated with heavy ions of Kr15+ with an energy of 147 MeV. Phys. Sci. Technol. 2020, 7, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zu, Y.; Chen, G.; Fu, X.; Luo, K.; Wang, C.; Song, S.; Zhou, W. Effects of liquid phases on densification of TiO2-doped Al2O3–ZrO2 composite ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 3989–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, W.; Li, Y. High-temperature electrical properties of polycrystalline MgO-doped ZrO2. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 113, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sarkar, D.; Mohapatra, D.; Ray, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Adak, S.; Mitra, N. Synthesis and characterization of sol–gel derived ZrO2 doped Al2O3 nanopowder. Ceram. Int. 2007, 33, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, B.K.; Roy, H.; Mondal, B.; Roy, S.S.; Mandal, N. Development and machinability evaluation of MgO doped Y-ZTA ceramic inserts for high-speed machining of steel. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2018, 22, 899–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Medvedev, P.G.; Frank, S.M.; O’Holleran, T.P.; Meyer, M.K. Dual phase MgO–ZrO2 ceramics for use in LWR inert matrix fuel. J. Nucl. Mater. 2005, 342, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dittmer, M.; Yamamoto, C.F.; Bocker, C.; Rüssel, C. Crystallization and mechanical properties of MgO/Al2O3/SiO2/ZrO2 glass-ceramics with and without the addition of yttria. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13, 2146–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, S.; Zhai, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, K. Coprecipitation Synthesis of MgO-Doped ZrO2 Nano Powder. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 3577–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belío-Reyes, I.A.; Bucio, L.; Cruz-Chavez, E. Phase composition of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate by X-ray powder diffraction. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 875–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Auerkari, P. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Engineering Alumina Ceramics; Technical Research Centre of Finland: Espoo, Finland, 1996; Volume 23. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jagielski, J.; Thomé, L.; Nowicki, L.; Turos, A.; Gentils, A.; Garrido, F.; Aubert, P. Ion irradiation of ceramic oxides: Disorder production and mechanical properties. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2005, 240, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Costantini, J.M.; Beuneu, F.; Gourier, D.; Trautmann, C.; Calas, G.; Toulemonde, M. Colour centre production in yttria-stabilized zirconia by swift charged particle irradiations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2004, 16, 3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Savoini, B.; Ballesteros, C.; Santiuste, J.M.; González, R.; Popov, A.I.; Chen, Y. Copper and iron precipitates in thermochemically reduced yttria-stabilized zirconia crystals. Philos. Mag. Lett. 2001, 81, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the studied samples of ceramics depending on the concentration of the MgO dopant.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of the studied samples of ceramics depending on the concentration of the MgO dopant.
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g001
Figure 2. (a) Changes in the crystal lattice parameters depending on the MgO concentration; (b) deformation of the crystal lattice depending on the MgO concentration.
Figure 2. (a) Changes in the crystal lattice parameters depending on the MgO concentration; (b) deformation of the crystal lattice depending on the MgO concentration.
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g002
Figure 3. Diagrams of phase polymorphic transformations in ceramics as a result of irradiation with heavy ions: (a) initial sample; (b) doped with 0.05 mol.% MgO; (c) doped with 0.10 mol.% MgO; (d) doped with 0.15 mol.% MgO.
Figure 3. Diagrams of phase polymorphic transformations in ceramics as a result of irradiation with heavy ions: (a) initial sample; (b) doped with 0.05 mol.% MgO; (c) doped with 0.10 mol.% MgO; (d) doped with 0.15 mol.% MgO.
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g003
Figure 4. (a) Swelling of the crystal lattice of ceramics depending on the irradiation fluence; (b) comparative diagram of the swelling resistance of doped ceramics at maximum irradiation fluence (1015 ion/cm2).
Figure 4. (a) Swelling of the crystal lattice of ceramics depending on the irradiation fluence; (b) comparative diagram of the swelling resistance of doped ceramics at maximum irradiation fluence (1015 ion/cm2).
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g004
Figure 5. (a) Dependence of hardness change on irradiation fluence; (b) dependence of change in degree of hardness degradation on irradiation fluence.
Figure 5. (a) Dependence of hardness change on irradiation fluence; (b) dependence of change in degree of hardness degradation on irradiation fluence.
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g005
Figure 6. Results of morphological studies of ceramics irradiated with a fluence of 1015 ion/cm2: (a) pristine sample; (b) 0.05 mol.%; (c) 0.10 mol.%; (d) 0.15 mol.%.
Figure 6. Results of morphological studies of ceramics irradiated with a fluence of 1015 ion/cm2: (a) pristine sample; (b) 0.05 mol.%; (c) 0.10 mol.%; (d) 0.15 mol.%.
Nanomaterials 11 03172 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurakhmedov, A.E.; Alin, M.; Temir, A.M.; Ivanov, I.A.; Bikhert, Y.V.; Ungarbayev, Y.O.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Kozlovskiy, A.L. Study of the Effect of Doping ZrO2 Ceramics with MgO to Increase the Resistance to Polymorphic Transformations under the Action of Irradiation. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123172

AMA Style

Kurakhmedov AE, Alin M, Temir AM, Ivanov IA, Bikhert YV, Ungarbayev YO, Zdorovets MV, Kozlovskiy AL. Study of the Effect of Doping ZrO2 Ceramics with MgO to Increase the Resistance to Polymorphic Transformations under the Action of Irradiation. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(12):3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurakhmedov, Alisher E., Mahambet Alin, Adilet M. Temir, Igor A. Ivanov, Yeugeniy V. Bikhert, Yerulan O. Ungarbayev, Maxim V. Zdorovets, and Artem L. Kozlovskiy. 2021. "Study of the Effect of Doping ZrO2 Ceramics with MgO to Increase the Resistance to Polymorphic Transformations under the Action of Irradiation" Nanomaterials 11, no. 12: 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123172

APA Style

Kurakhmedov, A. E., Alin, M., Temir, A. M., Ivanov, I. A., Bikhert, Y. V., Ungarbayev, Y. O., Zdorovets, M. V., & Kozlovskiy, A. L. (2021). Study of the Effect of Doping ZrO2 Ceramics with MgO to Increase the Resistance to Polymorphic Transformations under the Action of Irradiation. Nanomaterials, 11(12), 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop