Next Article in Journal
A Deep Learning Analysis Reveals Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots Damage Neurons of Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Broadband Antireflection of Moth-Eye Nanostructured Polymer Film with Flexible Polyethylene Terephthalate Substrate
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Inner Rotation of Pickering Janus Emulsions

Nanomaterials 2021, 11(12), 3312; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123312
by Rajarshi Roy Raju and Joachim Koetz *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(12), 3312; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123312
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 25 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 6 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article, Roy Raju and Koetz have prepared emulsions with a Janus structure that confine gold and magnetite nanoparticles in different layers. Such droplets are sensible to the presence of magnetic fields and the inner droplet rotates.   This work presents innovative results with scientific and technological interests. The used methodology is suitable and is conducted properly. However, more studies of the magnetic excitations on the Janus emulsions are required.  The following points need to be addressed:    • What is exactly the used configuration of the magnetic field? Is applied this field with a rotating magnet or with an electromagnet?.  More information about the application of the magnetic field is needed.   • Can the droplets move in linear translations guided by a gradient of the magnetic field?.   • Are there a dependence of the rotating frequency and the magnetic field?   • Do irradiate heat the rotating droplets at higher rotation frequencies? It could be interesting for magnetic hyperthermia applications.  

Author Response

Please see the attachement

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work of Raju and Koetz reports the first evidence of a controlled movement of nanoparticles in Pickering Janus emulsions. The topic is of great interest and the results are surprising.

For this reason, I consider the work appropriate for the publication on Nanomaterials after minor modifications.

  • Page 2 line 59 and 60 in Kg/m3, “3“must be superscript.
  • Page 2 line 61 there is an error in the formula of tetrachloroauric acid.
  • The reference section needs to be adjusted.

Author Response

Please see the attachement

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop