Author Contributions
S.S.: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, writing, review, and editing. E.M.: resources, supervision, visualization, review, and editing. D.C.: conceptualization, project administration, E.R.-A.: formal analysis, validation, visualization, review, and editing. J.A.C.: supervision, review, and editing. N.D.: conceptualization, project administration, supervision, review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Percentage of atomic Au on the surface versus polyvinyl alcohol hydrolysis degree.
Figure 1.
Percentage of atomic Au on the surface versus polyvinyl alcohol hydrolysis degree.
Figure 2.
(a) Pseudo–first–order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot for the comparison of the activity of Au/AC synthesized using PVA with different molecular weights. The reduction of 4–NP was carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2×10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 2.
(a) Pseudo–first–order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot for the comparison of the activity of Au/AC synthesized using PVA with different molecular weights. The reduction of 4–NP was carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2×10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 3.
(a) Kinetic plot for pseudo–first–order reaction and (b) conversion plot using Au/AC synthesized using full hydrolyzed PVA2 (Mw = 13,000–23,000) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio. Reaction carried out by using 25 mL of 4-NP (2 × 10−4 M) and 25 mL of NaBH4 (9 × 10−3 M), at 25 °C and different PVA amounts: 0.65 mL (Au/PVA (w/w) = 1:0.65), 0.33 mL (Au/PVA (w/w) = 1:0.33), 0.15 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.15).
Figure 3.
(a) Kinetic plot for pseudo–first–order reaction and (b) conversion plot using Au/AC synthesized using full hydrolyzed PVA2 (Mw = 13,000–23,000) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio. Reaction carried out by using 25 mL of 4-NP (2 × 10−4 M) and 25 mL of NaBH4 (9 × 10−3 M), at 25 °C and different PVA amounts: 0.65 mL (Au/PVA (w/w) = 1:0.65), 0.33 mL (Au/PVA (w/w) = 1:0.33), 0.15 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.15).
Figure 4.
(a) Pseudo–first−order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot for the comparison of the activity of Au/AC synthesized using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees. The reduction of 4–NP was carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10–4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 4.
(a) Pseudo–first−order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot for the comparison of the activity of Au/AC synthesized using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees. The reduction of 4–NP was carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10–4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 5.
Volcano plot for the effect of PVA hydrolysis degree on the catalytic activity, reaction carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25° C.
Figure 5.
Volcano plot for the effect of PVA hydrolysis degree on the catalytic activity, reaction carried out using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.65, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25° C.
Figure 6.
(a) Pseudo–first−order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot using Au/AC synthesized using PVA-60 (derived from a PVAc Mn = 23,300) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio. Reaction carried out by using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10−4 M) and 25 mL of NaBH4 (9 × 10−3 M), 25 °C and different PVA amounts: 1.2 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:1.2), 0.65 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.65), 0.33 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.33), 0.15 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.15), and 0 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0).
Figure 6.
(a) Pseudo–first−order kinetic plot and (b) conversion plot using Au/AC synthesized using PVA-60 (derived from a PVAc Mn = 23,300) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio. Reaction carried out by using 25 mL of 4–NP (2 × 10−4 M) and 25 mL of NaBH4 (9 × 10−3 M), 25 °C and different PVA amounts: 1.2 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:1.2), 0.65 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.65), 0.33 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.33), 0.15 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0.15), and 0 mL (Au/PVA (w/w)= 1:0).
Figure 7.
Hammett plot for the effect of the substituent in nitrophenol’s isomer on the catalytic activity, reaction carried out using 25 mL of NP (2 × 10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.33, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 7.
Hammett plot for the effect of the substituent in nitrophenol’s isomer on the catalytic activity, reaction carried out using 25 mL of NP (2 × 10−4 M), 25 mL of NaBH4 (9.0 × 10−3 M), Au/PVA weight ratio of 1:0.33, 4 mg of catalyst, at 25 °C.
Figure 8.
Plot of conversion per each run of the reusability tests.
Figure 8.
Plot of conversion per each run of the reusability tests.
Table 1.
Solvent mixtures used in the polyvinyl-acetate (PVAc) synthesis in order to control the molecular weight.
Table 1.
Solvent mixtures used in the polyvinyl-acetate (PVAc) synthesis in order to control the molecular weight.
| PVAc1 | PVAc2 | PVAc3 | PVAc4 |
---|
Ethanol | 100 | 75 | - | - |
Ethyl Acetate | - | 25 | 50 | - |
t-Butanol | - | - | 50 | 100 |
Table 2.
Molecular characteristics of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) used as polymeric stabilizers. * indicates a commercial product, ** indicates the molecular weight of starting material.
Table 2.
Molecular characteristics of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) used as polymeric stabilizers. * indicates a commercial product, ** indicates the molecular weight of starting material.
Sample | | Hydrolysis Degree |
---|
PVA2 * | 13,000–23,000 | 99 |
PVA3 * | 31,000–50,000 | 99 |
PVA7 | 92,300 ** | 99 |
PVA4 * | 146,000–186,000 | 99 |
PVA-88 * | 13,000–23,000 | 88 |
PVA-60 | 23,300 ** | 60 |
PVA-50 | 23,300 ** | 50 |
PVA-40 | 23,300 ** | 40 |
PVA-20 | 23,300 ** | 20 |
Table 3.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data for 1% wt. Au/activated carbon (AC) synthesized using PVA-99 with different molecular weights.
Table 3.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data for 1% wt. Au/activated carbon (AC) synthesized using PVA-99 with different molecular weights.
| | BE Au 4f7/2 (eV) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | C on Surface (% Atomic) | Surface Atomic Ratio Au/C |
---|
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 84.1 | 1.47 | 91.2 | 0.02 |
PVA3 | 31,000–50,000 | 84.1 | 1.22 | 91.4 | 0.02 |
PVA7 | 92,300 | 84.0 | 2.31 | 89.5 | 0.03 |
PVA4 | 146,000–186,000 | 84.1 | 1.13 | 92.3 | 0.01 |
Table 4.
Comparison between poly-dispersity index (PI), dynamic light scattering (DLS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) diameter of gold nanoparticles synthesized using PVA with different molecular weights.
Table 4.
Comparison between poly-dispersity index (PI), dynamic light scattering (DLS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) diameter of gold nanoparticles synthesized using PVA with different molecular weights.
| | PIDLS | dDLS (nm) | dTEM (nm) | dXRD (nm) |
---|
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 0.34 | 6.0 | 3.2 | - |
PVA3 | 31,000–50,000 | 0.83 | 3.9 | 3.8 | - |
PVA7 | 92,300 | 0.59 | 6.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
PVA4 | 146,000–186,000 | 0.46 | 7.5 | 5.7 | 5.9 |
Table 5.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA-2 (Mn = 13,000–23,000) with different hydrolysis degrees.
Table 5.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA-2 (Mn = 13,000–23,000) with different hydrolysis degrees.
| Hydrolysis Degree | BE Au 4f7/2 (eV) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | C on Surface (% Atomic) | Surface Atomic ratio Au/C |
---|
PVA-99 | 99 | 84.1 | 1.47 | 91.2 | 0.02 |
PVA-88 | 88 | 84.1 | 2.04 | 89.7 | 0.02 |
PVA-60 | 60 | 84.1 | 3.34 | 90.2 | 0.04 |
PVA-50 | 50 | 84.1 | 1.72 | 92.2 | 0.02 |
PVA-40 | 40 | 84.0 | 1.33 | 90.1 | 0.02 |
PVA-20 | 20 | 84.0 | 0.86 | 94.1 | 0.01 |
Table 6.
Comparison between poly-dispersity index (PI), DLS, XRD, and TEM diameter of gold nanoparticles obtained using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees.
Table 6.
Comparison between poly-dispersity index (PI), DLS, XRD, and TEM diameter of gold nanoparticles obtained using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees.
| Hydrolysis Degree | PIDLS | dDLS (nm) | dTEM (nm) | dXRD (nm) |
---|
PVA-99 | 99 | 0.34 | 6.0 | 3.2 | - |
PVA-88 | 88 | 0.68 | 5.1 | 3.4 | - |
PVA-60 | 60 | 0.30 | 5.1 | 3.9 | - |
PVA-50 | 50 | 0.47 | 9.4 | 4.2 | - |
PVA-40 | 40 | 0.59 | 12.1 | 4.3 | - |
PVA-20 | 20 | 0.51 | 13.5 | 9.6 | 9.6 |
Table 7.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA with different molecular weights.
Table 7.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA with different molecular weights.
| | dTEM (nm) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | kapp (min−1) | X% |
---|
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 3.2 | 1.47 | 1.8 × 10−3 ± 4 × 10−4 | 14 ± 1 |
PVA3 | 31,000–50,000 | 3.8 | 1.22 | 3.1 × 10−3 ± 8 × 10−4 | 24 ± 1 |
PVA7 | 92,300 | 4.2 | 2.31 | 3.7 × 10−3 ± 4 × 10−4 | 22 ± 1 |
PVA4 | 146,000–186,000 | 5.7 | 1.13 | 2.4 × 10−3 ± 3 × 10−4 | 20 ± 1 |
Table 8.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using full hydrolyzed PVA2 (Mw = 13,000–23,000) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio.
Table 8.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using full hydrolyzed PVA2 (Mw = 13,000–23,000) by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio.
| | Au:PVA | PIDLS | dDLS (nm) | dTEM (nm) | dXRD (nm) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | kapp (min−1) | X% |
---|
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 1:0.65 | 0.34 | 6.0 | 3.2 | - | 1.47 | 1.8∙10−3 ± 4∙10−4 | 14 ± 1 |
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 1:0.33 | 0.36 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.35 | 3.9∙10−3 ± 2∙104 | 37 ± 3 |
PVA2 | 13,000–23,000 | 1:0.15 | 0.78 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 1.46 | 5.3∙10−2 ± 2∙10−3 | 66 ± 6 |
Table 9.
XPS data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA2 (Mn = 13,000–23,000) with different Au:PVA weight ratios.
Table 9.
XPS data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA2 (Mn = 13,000–23,000) with different Au:PVA weight ratios.
| Au:PVA (w/w) | BE Au 4f7/2 (eV) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | C on Surface (% Atomic) | Surface Atomic Ratio Au/C |
---|
PVA2 | 1:0.65 | 84.1 | 1.47 | 91.2 | 0.02 |
PVA2 | 1:0.33 | 84.2 | 3.35 | 89.9 | 0.04 |
PVA2 | 1.0.15 | 84.1 | 1.46 | 93.2 | 0.02 |
Table 10.
Values of the apparent kinetic constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees.
Table 10.
Values of the apparent kinetic constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA with different hydrolysis degrees.
| Hydrolysis Degree | dTEM (nm) | Au on Surface (% atomic) | kapp (min−1) | X% |
---|
PVA-99 | 99 | 3.2 | 1.47 | 1.8∙10−3 ± 4∙10−4 | 14 ± 1 |
PVA-88 | 88 | 3.4 | 2.04 | 7.9∙10−2 ± 1∙10−3 | 97 ± 1 |
PVA-60 | 60 | 3.9 | 3.34 | 0.20 ± 4∙10−3 | 99 ±0.4 |
PVA-50 | 50 | 4.2 | 1.72 | 0.10 ± 4∙10−2 | 99 ± 1 |
PVA-40 | 40 | 4.3 | 1.33 | 6.3∙10−2 ± 9∙10−3 | 97 ± 1 |
PVA-20 | 20 | 9.6 | 0.86 | 1.4∙10−3 ± 2∙10−4 | 16 ± 0.2 |
Table 11.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA-60 (derived from a PVac Mn = 23,300), by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio.
Table 11.
Values of the apparent constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order reactions using PVA-60 (derived from a PVac Mn = 23,300), by varying the Au/PVA weight ratio.
| Hydrolysis Degree | Au:PVA | PIDLS | dDLS (nm) | dTEM (nm) | dXRD(nm) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | kapp (min−1) | X% |
---|
PVA60 | 60 | 1:1.2 | 0.52 | 5.1 | 3.5 | - | 1.87 | 0.12 ± 5∙10−2 | 93 ± 1 |
PVA60 | 60 | 1:0.65 | 0.30 | 5.1 | 3.9 | - | 3.34 | 0.20 ± 4∙10−3 | 99 ± 0.4 |
PVA60 | 60 | 1:0.33 | 0.78 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 1.38 | 0.30 ± 4∙10−2 | 99 ± 0.3 |
PVA60 | 60 | 1:0.15 | 0.46 | 8.2 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 1.62 | 0.19 ± 2∙10−2 | 99 ± 1 |
PVA60 | 60 | 1:0 | 0.32 | 10.7 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 1.06 | 0.13 ± 4∙10−2 | 75 ± 1 |
Table 12.
XPS data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA-60 (derived form a PVAc Mn = 23,300) with different Au:PVA weight ratios.
Table 12.
XPS data for 1% wt. Au/AC synthesized using PVA-60 (derived form a PVAc Mn = 23,300) with different Au:PVA weight ratios.
| Au:PVA (w/w) | BE Au 4f7/2 (eV) | Au on Surface (% Atomic) | C on Surface (% Atomic) | Surface Atomic Ratio Au/C |
---|
PVA-60 | 1:1.2 | 84.1 | 1.87 | 92.9 | 0.02 |
PVA-60 | 1:0.65 | 84.1 | 3.34 | 90.2 | 0.04 |
PVA-60 | 1:0.33 | 84.1 | 1.38 | 93.2 | 0.02 |
PVA-60 | 1.0.15 | 84.1 | 1.62 | 93.7 | 0.02 |
PVA-60 | 1:0 | 84.1 | 1.06 | 94.9 | 0.01 |
Table 13.
Apparent kinetic constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order-reactions using PVA-60 with an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1.0.33.
Table 13.
Apparent kinetic constant and conversion for pseudo-first-order-reactions using PVA-60 with an Au/PVA weight ratio of 1.0.33.
| σ [54] | kapp (min−1) | X% |
---|
4-nitrophenol | 1.22 | 0.30 ± 4∙10−2 | 99 ± 0.3 |
2-nitrophenol | 0.13 | 0.41± 2∙10−2 | 99 ± 0.1 |
3-nitrophenol | −0.38 | 0.43± 2∙10−2 | 99 ± 0.3 |