Next Article in Journal
Influence of NaYF4 Inert and Active Layer on Upconversion Luminescence
Next Article in Special Issue
Time-Dependent Charge Carrier Transport with Hall Effect in Organic Semiconductors for Langevin and Non-Langevin Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Nanobubbles in Dermal Delivery of Drugs and Cosmetics
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Linearity Synaptic Devices Using Ar Plasma Treatment on HfO2 Thin Film with Non-Identical Pulse Waveforms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Room Temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS Ammonia Gas Sensor

Department of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(19), 3287; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193287
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 18 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D Semiconducting Materials for Device Applications)

Abstract

:
This study uses ultrasonic grinding to grind ZnO powder to 10–20-nanometer nanoparticles (NPs), and these are integrated with a MEMS structure to form a ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. Measuring 1 ppm NH3 gas and operating at room temperature, the sensor response for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor is around 39.7%, but the origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor is fairly unresponsive. For seven consecutive cycles, the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor has an average sensor response of about 40% and an inaccuracy of <±2%. In the selectivity of the gas, the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor has a higher response to NH3 than to CO, CO2, H2, or SO2 gases because ZnO nanoparticles have a greater surface area and more surface defects, so they adsorb more oxygen molecules and water molecules. These react with NH3 gas to increase the sensor response.

1. Introduction

Gas sensors are used in the petrochemical industry and manufacturing and to monitor environmental pollution as an early warning device to protect health. These toxic gases contain NOx, SOx, ammonia (NH3) and H2S. NH3 is one of the most widely produced chemicals, with annual production exceeding 100 million tons [1]. In addition to the semiconductor industry, NH3 is also widely used in the food industry, the refrigeration industry and clinical medicine [2]. NH3 is a colorless gas with a pungent odor that irritates the eyes and upper respiratory tract. In small concentrations, it affects human health. Therefore, it is very important to detect NH3.
In the last decade, standard air quality inspection stations and small gas sensors, such as infrared dots, catalytic beads, and photoionized and metal oxide semiconducting (MOS) sensors, have been the subject of many studies [3]. Recently, a polarization-insensitive design of a hybrid plasmonic waveguide to detect methane gas [4], using SmFeO3 material to detect acetylene, has also been reported [5]. However, for applications to protect human health on the go, gas sensors must be miniaturized, sensitivity must be increased, and power consumption and cost must be reduced. MOS sensors have been widely studied because of their small size, low cost and compatibility with silicon-based microelectronic devices. Semiconductor sensors with microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) are easily embedded in consumer devices and are suitable for wearable applications. These MOS materials include SnO2 [6], ZnO [7], CuO [8], La2O3 [9], CeO [10], and TiO2 [11].
ZnO is a chemically and thermally stable n-type MOS that features a 60-electronvolt exciton binding energy and a 3.2-electronvolt bandgap at room temperature [12], hence it is widely used in photodetectors, pH sensors and to detect toxic and combustible gases [13]. In recent years, MOS gas sensors have become more sensitive and power consumption has decreased. Nanostructures such as nanowires, nanoparticles and nanotubes are used to increase the sensitivity of sensors because, unlike body membrane and thin film sensors, nanostructured sensors have a greater response due to their large aspect ratio and high surface area to volume ratio [7].
To decrease power consumption, gas sensors must detect toxic gases at ambient temperature (~25 °C). Wang et al. reported a room-temperature gas sensor that has a ZnO nanorod/Au structure, and the sensitivity was 3.59 at 1 ppm NH3 [14]. Irajizad et al. reported a H2S gas sensor based on aligned ZnO nanorods with flower-like structures that operates at room temperature; and the sensor response was 581 at 5 ppm H2S [15]. Dong et al. reported a room-temperature ZnO nanorods NH3 gas sensor; the results indicated that the sensitivity is about 8 at 500 ppm NH3 [16].
This study produces ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) using ultrasonic wave grinding technology and these are combined with a MEMS structure to form a ZnO-NPs/MEMS NH3 room temperature gas sensor. The fabrication of the sensor and the characteristics of the ZnO-NPs are discussed. The sensing properties of the ZnO NPs at room temperature for NH3 gas are also determined.

2. Materials and Methods

To fabricate ZnO nanoparticles, 0.5 g of zinc oxide powder, 4.1 g of alcohol and 1 mm 30 g of yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) were mixed in a glass bottle. The zinc oxide powder was purchased from the Echo chemical Co., Ltd. (Tainan, Taiwan), and the purity is 99.7%. The glass bottle was then placed in a DELTA DC200 ultrasonic oscillator and a ZnO nanoparticle solution was produced after 14 days of grinding.
The structure of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor includes a MEMS structure and a sensing layer. The MEMS comprises a microheater, a sensing electrode, a dielectric layer of silicon nitride (Si3N4) and an isolation layer of silicon dioxide (SiO2) on a silicon (Si) suspension structure. Detailed fabrication methods have been reported [17], but the sensing layer is different to that of previous studies. Figure 1a shows the optical microscope image of the MEMS structure, and Figure 1b shows the schematic image of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS structure.
For this study, the ZnO nanoparticles solution was dropped directly onto the sensing electrode A snake-shaped micro heater surrounds the finger-shaped electrode. The ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor was aged at about 293 °C for five days, using a microheater. Figure 1c shows an infrared (IR) thermal image of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. The sensing area is maintained at 293 °C, but the other area is close to room temperature because the suspension structure prevents thermal diffusion.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, STD PC, Jeol india pvt. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) is used to observe the surface morphology of the ZnO nanoparticles. The crystallization of the ZnO nanoparticles was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8D Plus-TXS with CuKα radiation, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at room temperature. The morphology and the structure of the ZnO-NPs were also measured using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-2100F, Jeol india pvt. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The gas sensor was placed into an airtight chamber. The volume of the chamber is about 8.8 L. The sensing properties of the sensor were measured using a source meter (Keithley 2400, Tektronix, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) that is connected to the sensing electrode and the results were recorded using a computer with LabVIEW software. During all measurements, the micro heater has no bias, and the voltage of the interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) is 5V. ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor is operated at test chamber temperature (Note: the test chamber temperature is the same as the ambient room temperature). The ambient room temperature and relative humidity (RH) were about 23 °Cand 60%. In addition, ammonia gas is a mixture of 3% ammonia and 97% nitrogen (Yun Shan Gas Co., Tainan, Taiwan). The photoluminescence (PL) of the ZnO powder and ZnO-NPs was measured at room temperature using a 325 nm laser (HORIBA HR800, ISN, Cambridge, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a,b respectively show the top view SEM images of pure ZnO powder and ZnO powder after ultrasonic grinding. The size is not uniform and the pure ZnO powders are about 200 nm~1 µm, as shown in Figure 2a. ZnO powder is uniform after ultrasonic grinding and the particles are about 10–20 nm, as shown in the TEM image in Figure 3a. These results also show that ultrasonic grinding gives ZnO powder that is on the nanometer scale, so it is at least 20 times smaller. Figure 3b shows the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image of the ZnO-NPs. The light spots on the map show multiple circular shapes so ZnO-NPs have a polycrystalline structure. Figure 4 shows the XRD pattern for ZnO nanoparticles that are deposited on glass. The value for 2θ is from 20° to 60°. The diffraction peaks are at 2θ = 31.75°, 34.48°, 36.39°, 47.68° and 56.65°. These peaks are typical of the planes of Wurtzite hexagonal ZnO and, respectively, correspond to rthe eflection of the (100), (002), (101), (102) and (110) planes (P63mc space group, a = 3.250 Å, c = 5.207 Å; JCPDS card no. 79-2205) [3]. In addition, using the Pseudo–Voigt function, it can be found that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the (100), (002), (101), (102), and (110) planes were about 0.73, 0.95, 0.82, 1.02, and 0.96. Therefore, using the Scherrer equation can be calculated the grain size of the (100), (002), (101), (102), and (110) planes were about 20.57 nm, 15.9 nm, 18.6 nm, 15.49 nm, and 17.2 nm.
To measure NH3 gas, the sensor response is calculated as [(Rair − Rgas)/Rair × 100%], where Rair is the resistance in air and Rgas is the resistance in the target gas: NH3. Figure 5 shows the sensor response for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. During the measurements, 1 ppm (parts per million, ppm), 0.4 ppm, 0.3 ppm, and 0.1 ppm NH3 were introduced into the airtight chamber at room temperature. Using this definition, the respective sensor response is around 39.7%, 21%, 17% and 6.9% for a concentration of NH3 gas of 1 ppm, 0.4 ppm, 0.3 ppm, and 0.1 ppm. The sensor response increases as the NH3 gas concentration increases. The response time and recovery time are not decreased at room temperature.
Figure 6 shows the stability and the reproducibility of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. This experiment used seven cycles for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. Each cycle involved injecting NH3 gas for 5 min and then exhausting the gas for 5 min. Figure 6 shows the switching sensor response for a ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor that is exposed to 1 ppm NH3 gas at room temperature. When the NH3 gas is injected and exhausted, the resistance in the ZnO-NPs decreases and increases. Using the same definition, the average sensor response is about 40%, with an inaccuracy of <±2%. These results also show that the response of the fabricated sensor is stable and reversible. Figure 7 shows the sensor response for the origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor and the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. The origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor is almost unresponsive. This result confirms that the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor senses low NH3 concentrations at room temperature.
In terms of the sensing mechanism for the room temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor, the material defects of the ZnO-NPs must be considered. Figure 8 shows the room temperature PL spectra for origin-ZnO powder and ZnO-NPs on glass. The PL spectra for the origin-ZnO powder clearly show that a sharp strong peak is located at around 383 nm. This UV emission peak is attributed to the near band-edge (NBE) emissions of ZnO (exciton transition) [18]. The PL spectra for ZnO-NPs are different to that for origin-ZnO powder. In addition to the NBE emissions, the ZnO-NPs also have a broad peak at around 562 nm. This is the deep level emission of ZnO (green–yellow band). This emission band is attributed to ionized oxygen vacancies (VO+), oxygen interstitials (Oi) and neutral oxygen vacancies (VO) [18]. The source of these deep-level emissions is ZnO surface defects that are caused by the ultrasonic grinding process. Therefore, when a reducing gas (NH3) is injected, ZnO-NPs are more responsive than the origin-ZnO powder, as shown in Figure 7. In addition, these ZnO surface defects also provided lower NH3 concentration sensing, as shown in Figure 5.
Oxygen molecules play an important role in the sensing mechanism of MOS gas sensors. When O2 is attached to the MOS surface, O2 captures electrons on the MOS surface to form oxygen ions (O2, O, or O2−) and the resistance of the n-type material (such as ZnO) increases and the resistance of p-type decreases. When the reducing gas (such as CO, NH3) is injected, it reacts with oxygen ions, and captured electrons return to the material so the resistance of the n-type material decreases, as shown in Figure 6. During gas sensing, the production of chemisorbed oxygen species is largely dependent on temperature. At lower temperatures (<150 °C) O2 is chemisorbed and at higher temperatures, O is chemisorbed faster by O2− [19,20,21]. The ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor for this study operates at room temperature so the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor is affected by ambient temperature and humidity. Figure 9 shows the effect of ambient temperature and humidity on the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. During the experiment, the RH decreases from ~90% to ~35% and the chamber temperature is 30.3 °C. The results show that the sensor’s resistance increases when humidity decreases. For a humidity of less than 40%, the sensor’s resistance increases significantly because water molecules are chemisorbed onto the surface of the ZnO-NPs when the sensor is in a low-humidity environment (<40%). The adsorption of the water molecules is not continuous, hence charges are hopped by protons (H+) [22,23]. In a medium-humidity environment (about 40%~75%), water molecules are chemisorbed and physisorbed onto the surface of the ZnO-NPs so physical adsorption of the water layer plays a leading role during the charge transfer [22,23]. In a high humidity environment (>75%), charge transport occurs in the physisorbed water layer. In this study, ammonia gas is measured in a medium-humidity environment, hence oxygen ions react with ammonia on the surface of the ZnO-NPs and water ions participate in the reaction. The reaction between oxygen ions and ammonia is written as [24]:
4NH3 + 3O2 → 2N2 + 6H2O + 3e
Physisorbed H2O also reacts with NH3 to produce NH4OH [25]. Therefore, if NH4OH is on the surface of the ZnO-NPs, it reacts with adsorbed O2 to generate nitrogen oxide gas [26], as:
4NH4OH + 7O2 → 4NO2 + 10H2O + 15e
These oxidation and reduction reactions enable the sensor to rapidly respond and recover.
Figure 10 shows the CO, CO2, H2, NH3, and SO2 responses for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor at room temperature and ~60% RH. The sensor response for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor is not significant when CO, CO2 and H2 are injected at approximately 10 ppm, 800 ppm and 10 ppm. There is a 5.3% sensor response if the sensor is in a 1 ppm SO2 atmosphere. These results show that the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor has a higher selectivity for NH3 gas.

4. Conclusions

Ultrasonic grinding is used to fabricate nanosized ZnO particles. The ZnO nanoparticles are combined with a MEMS structure to form a ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor. TEM analysis shows that the ZnO nanoparticles are about 10 nm. To measure the gas sensor, the sensors were operated at room temperature. For a concentration of NH3 gas of 1 ppm, 400 ppb, 300 ppb and 100 ppb, the respective sensor response is around 39.7%, 21%, 17% and 6.9%. To measure the stability and reproducibility, the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor is subjected to seven consecutive cycles. The average sensor response is about 40% (1 ppm) with an inaccuracy of <±2%. The origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor is almost unresponsive. These results confirm that this study produces a room temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor that senses low NH3 concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-J.H.; methodology, T.-J.H.; validation, T.-J.H. and R.-Y.D.; formal analysis, T.-J.H. and R.-Y.D. investigation, T.-J.H. and R.-Y.D.; resources, T.-J.H.; data curation, T.-J.H. and R.-Y.D.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-J.H.; writing—review and editing, T.-J.H.; visualization, T.-J.H. supervision, T.-J.H.; project administration, T.-J.H.; funding acquisition, T.-J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NSTC of Taiwan grant number 110-2221-E-992-047, 111-2221-E-992-029-MY3, 111-2218-E-992-001-MBK, 111-2218-E-006-011-MBK.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for financial support and Taiwanese Semiconductor Research Institute.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, J.; Ouyang, J.; Ye, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S. Mixed-Valence Cobalt(II/III) Metal−Organic Framework for Ammonia. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27465–27471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hernandez, S.C.; Chaudhuri, D.; Chen, W.; Myung, N.V.; Mulchandani, A. Single Polypyrrole Nanowire Ammonia Gas Sensor. Electroanalysis 2007, 19, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hsueh, T.J.; Lu, C.L. A hybrid YSZ/SnO2/MEMS SO2 gas sensor. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 27800–27806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kazanskiy, N.L.; Khonina, S.N.; Butt, M.A. Polarization-Insensitive Hybrid Plasmonic Waveguide Design for Evanescent Field Absorption Gas Sensor. Photonic Sens. 2021, 11, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tasaki, T.; Takase, S.; Shimizu, Y. Improvement of Sensing Performance of Impedancemetric C2H2 Sensor Using SmFeO3 Thin-Films Prepared by a Polymer Precursor Method. Sensors 2019, 19, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, J.; Wu, Z.; Ding, H.; Wei, Y.; Huang, W.; Yang, X.; Li, Z.; Qiu, L.; Wang, X. Three-Dimensional Graphene Hydrogel Decorated with SnO2 for High Performance NO2 Sensing with Enhanced Immunity to Humidity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 2634–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hsueh, T.J.; Peng, C.H.; Chen, W.S. A Transparent ZnO nanowire MEMS Gas Sensor produced by an ITO Micro-Heater. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 304, 127319–127328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.J.; Wang, N.N.; Lin, Z.J.; Wang, J.Q.; Liu, W.; Sun, K. Room-Temperature High-Performance H2S Sensor Based on Porous CuO Nanosheets Prepared by Hydrothermal Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 32, 20962–20968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hsueh, T.J.; Lee, S.H. A La2O3-NPs/ZnO/MEMS SO2 Gas Sensor. J. Eletrochemical Soc. 2021, 168, 027508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsueh, T.J.; Wu, S.S. Highly sensitive Co3O4 nanoparticles/MEMS NO2 gas sensor with the adsorption of the Au nanoparticles Sensor. Actuators B Chem 2020, 329, 129201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, T.J.; Hsueh, T.J. A NO2 gas sensor with a TiO2 nanoparticles/ZnO/MEMS-structure that is produced using ultrasonic wave grinding technology. J. Electrochem 2020, 44, 9536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, X.B.; Du, H.J.; Wang, P.H.; Lim, T.T.; Sun, X.W. A high-performance UV/visible photodetector of Cu2O/ZnO hybrid nanofilms on SWNT-based flexible conducting substrates. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 44, 9536–9542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, D.C.; Han, W.S.; Kong, B.H.; Cho, H.K.; Hong, C.H. Fabrication of the hybrid ZnO LED structure grown on p-type GaN by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Phys. B Condens. 2007, 401, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Fan, S.; Xia, Y.; Yang, C.; Komarneni, S. Room-temperature gas sensors based on ZnO nanorod/Au hybrids: Visible-light- modulated dual selectivity to NO2 and NH3. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hosseini, Z.S.; Irajizad, A.; Mortezaali, A. Room temperature H2S gas sensor based on rather aligned ZnO nanorods with flower-like structures. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 207, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, A.; Wang, Z.; Pan, L.H.; Li, W.W.; Xiong, L.; Dong, X.C.; Huang, W. Room-Temperature NH3 Gas Sensor Based on Hydrothermally Grown ZnO Nanorods. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2011, 28, 080702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hsueh, T.J.; Lee, S.H. A La2O3 Nanoprticle SO2 Gas sensor that Uses a ZnO ThinFilm and Au adsorption. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 077507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghosh, H.; Sadeghimakki, B.; Sivoththaman, S. Enhancement of UV emission and optical bandgap of ZnO nanowires via doping and post-growth annealing. Marerials Res. Express 2020, 7, 035013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hellegouarc’h, F.; Arefi-khonsari, F.; Planada, R.; Amouroux, J. PECVD prepared SnO2 thin films for ethanol sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2001, 73, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sahay, P.P. Zinc oxide thin film gas sensor for detection of acetone. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 4383–4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, W.; Kang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Cui, X. Facile synthesis of porous cubic microstructure of Co3O4 from ZIF-67pyrolysis and its Au doped structure for enhanced acetone gas-sensing. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2019, 113, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsai, F.S.; Wang, S.J. Enhanced sensing performance of relative humidity sensors using laterally grown ZnO nanosheets. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 193, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, C.; Gu, W.; Yu, S.; Zhang, H. Effect of surfactant on performance of ZnO humidity sensor. Optoelectron. Lett. 2021, 17, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ganesh, R.S.; Durgadevi, E.; Navaneethan, M.; Patil, V.L.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Kawasaki, S.; Patil, P.S.; Hayakawa, Y. Tuning the selectivity of NH3 gas sensing response using Cu-doped ZnO nanostructures. Sens. Actuators A 2017, 269, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rao, G.S.T.; Rao, D.T. Gas sensitivity of ZnO based thick film sensor to NH3 at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 1999, 55, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahman, M.M.; Jamal, A.; Khan, S.B.; Faisal, M. CuO Codoped ZnO Based Nanostructured Materials for Sensitive Chemical Sensor Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 4, 1346–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The optical microscope, (b) the structure and (c) infrared thermal images of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Figure 1. (a) The optical microscope, (b) the structure and (c) infrared thermal images of the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g001
Figure 2. Top view SEM images of (a) origin-ZnO powder and (b) ZnO powder after ultrasonic grinding.
Figure 2. Top view SEM images of (a) origin-ZnO powder and (b) ZnO powder after ultrasonic grinding.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g002
Figure 3. (a) The TEM image of the ZnO powder after ultrasonic grinding and (b) the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image of the ZnO-NPs.
Figure 3. (a) The TEM image of the ZnO powder after ultrasonic grinding and (b) the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image of the ZnO-NPs.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g003
Figure 4. The XRD pattern for ZnO nanoparticles that are deposited on glass.
Figure 4. The XRD pattern for ZnO nanoparticles that are deposited on glass.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g004
Figure 5. Sensor response for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS NH3 sensor at room temperature at various concentrations.
Figure 5. Sensor response for the ZnO-NPs/MEMS NH3 sensor at room temperature at various concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g005
Figure 6. Response for a ZnO-NPs/MEMS NH3 sensor that is exposed to 1 ppm NH3 at room temperature.
Figure 6. Response for a ZnO-NPs/MEMS NH3 sensor that is exposed to 1 ppm NH3 at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g006
Figure 7. The sensor response for the origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor and the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Figure 7. The sensor response for the origin-ZnO powder/MEMS gas sensor and the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g007
Figure 8. The room temperature photoluminescence spectrum for origin-ZnO powder and ZnO-NPs on glass.
Figure 8. The room temperature photoluminescence spectrum for origin-ZnO powder and ZnO-NPs on glass.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g008
Figure 9. The effect of ambient temperature and humidity on the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Figure 9. The effect of ambient temperature and humidity on the ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g009
Figure 10. Response to CO, CO2, H2, NH3 and SO2 for a ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor at room temperature.
Figure 10. Response to CO, CO2, H2, NH3 and SO2 for a ZnO-NPs/MEMS gas sensor at room temperature.
Nanomaterials 12 03287 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsueh, T.-J.; Ding, R.-Y. A Room Temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS Ammonia Gas Sensor. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3287. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193287

AMA Style

Hsueh T-J, Ding R-Y. A Room Temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS Ammonia Gas Sensor. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(19):3287. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsueh, Ting-Jen, and Ruei-Yan Ding. 2022. "A Room Temperature ZnO-NPs/MEMS Ammonia Gas Sensor" Nanomaterials 12, no. 19: 3287. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193287

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop