Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of CNT@CoS/NiCo Layered Double Hydroxides with Hollow Nanocages to Enhance Supercapacitors Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Triboelectric and Piezoelectric Nanogenerators for Self-Powered Healthcare Monitoring Devices: Operating Principles, Challenges, and Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation on Thermal Performance of Al/Al2O3/SWCNT Nanocoolants for Turning Operations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Special Issue: Advance in Energy Harvesters/Nanogenerators and Self-Powered Sensors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Measurement of Slips at Contact Interfaces Using a Self-Powered Sensor Based on Triboelectric Nanogenerators

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(19), 3510; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193510
by Wangjia Zhao, Wenjie Qin *, Mingsen Ba and Yu Sun
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(19), 3510; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12193510
Submission received: 25 August 2022 / Revised: 17 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 7 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, the authors reported a self-powered displacement sensor based on triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) to measure the slips at contact interfaces.    It is recognized that measurement of slips has various practical applications, however, I don't think this work is sufficiently innovative for publication in its current version. 

Detailed comments: 

1) The author stated that "However, these self-powered sensors based on the principle of TENG are often used to measure the macroscopic displacement of objects, and there are few reports on measuring the microslip between contact surfaces." It seems that 1) the measurement of micro slip is just another application of micro-displacement measurement. and 2) it seems that some research exists on measuring the microslip. The authors need to justify the innovation and state-of-the-art.

2) Another result that emphasized is "multimeter vs. electrometer". Again, there is no justification of one over the other. 

3) There is no comparison of this measuring results to other methods. It is unclear what is the advantages of this methods. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Present Manuscript discuss about the sensor application of TENG device. Article is interesting and well written. However method section should be improved. 

(1) Authors used BaTiO3 film as an active layer in the TENG device. However no preparation method of the film is given. Authors must clarify nature of the film i.e. if it is ceramic or  polymer composite film. 

(2) SEM micrograph shows scale bar 500 nm and yet the grain contrast is very well. We expect for a 100 nm thick film, grains must be very small to be resolved at that scale bar. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed my comments in the revised manuscript. I would suggest accept this work.

Back to TopTop