Next Article in Journal
Decrease of Greenhouse Gases during an In Vitro Ruminal Digestibility Test of Forage (Festuca arundinacea) Conditioned with Selenium Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
The Thermal Performance Analysis of an Al2O3-Water Nanofluid Flow in a Composite Microchannel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 21
10.3390/nano12213822
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spinel CoFe2O4 Nanoflakes: A Path to Enhance Energy Generation and Environmental Remediation Potential of Waste-Derived rGO

by
Tamilselvi Ramasamy
1,
Lekshmi Gopakumari Satheesh
2,
Vaithilingam Selvaraj
3,
Olha Bazaka
4,
Igor Levchenko
5,
Kateryna Bazaka
6 and
Mohandas Mandhakini
1,*
1
Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
2
International Centre for Research on Innovative Biobased Materials (ICRI-BioM)-International Research Agenda, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
3
Nanotech Research Lab, Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering Villupuram (a Constituent College of Anna University, Chennai-25), Villupuram 605103, India
4
School of Science, College of Science, Engineering and Health, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
5
Plasma Sources and Application Center, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore
6
School of Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3822; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213822
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 29 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section 2D and Carbon Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Carbon nanomaterials derived from agricultural waste streams present an exciting material platform that hits multiple sustainability targets by reducing waste entering landfill, and enabling clean energy and environmental remediation technologies. In this work, the energy and photocatalytic properties of reduced graphene oxide fabricated from coconut coir using a simple reduction method using ferrocene are substantially improved by introducing metallic oxides flakes. A series of cobalt ferrite rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites were assembled using a simple soft bubble self-templating assembly, and their potential for clean energy applications confirmed. The transmission electron microscopy images revealed the uniform dispersion of the metal oxide on the rGO sheets. The functional group of the as synthesized metal oxide and the rGO nanocomposites, and its individual constituents, were identified through the FTIR and XPS studies, respectively. The composite materials showed higher specific capacitance then the pure materials, with rGO spinal metal oxide nanocomposites showing maximum specific capacitance of 396 F/g at 1 A/g. Furthermore, the hybrid super capacitor exhibits the excellent cyclic stability 2000 cycles with 95.6% retention. The photocatalytic properties of the synthesized rGO nanocomposites were analyzed with the help of malachite green dye. For pure metal oxide, the degradation rate was only around 65% within 120 min, while for rGO metal oxide nanocomposites, more than 80% of MG were degraded.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The path towards “zero carbon” or “below zero” emission reduction targets is inherently linked to finding solutions for sustainable energy generation and storage, as well as mechanisms to reduce energy consumption and waste generation. Waste from agricultural industry is increasingly attracting attention for the role it may play in environmental remediation and in reducing greenhouse gas emissions as the global communities move towards a cleaner world [1,2,3]. For material synthesis, biomass waste is a valuable source of carbon and trace minerals [4,5,6], where the micro- and nanostructure of the material may give rise to unusual material architectures without the need for complex templates or multi-step processes [7,8,9,10,11,12]. With an attractive combination of properties such as good conductivity, high surface area and chemical reactivity, these multipurpose materials can underpin sustainable circular economy by enabling new efficient nanomaterial-based devices [13,14] and functional coatings [15,16,17]. In particular, the visible light driven catalytic platforms for environmental remediation [18,19], and the efficient energy storage and conversion devices [20,21] such as supercapacitors and fuel cells (e.g., direct methanol fuel cells, DMFCs) which attract tremendous interest because of the higher efficiency, low pollution emission and flexible fuel choice [22,23]. Both of these types of energy devices require electroactive materials with excellent electro-chemical activity (i.e., multiple oxidation states, low onset potential, more surface-active sites for redox reaction, etc., that affect the exchange current density) [24].
By the nature of the charge storage mechanism, supercapacitors are classified as: (i) electrical double layer capacitors (EDLC); and (ii) pseudocapacitors. For supercapacitors that store their energy by the EDLC mechanism, carbon-based materials, such as graphene, reduced graphene oxide, activated carbon, graphene oxide, carbon nanofibers and so on, are amongst the most promising cathode materials [25,26]. However, these materials are typically synthesized using input materials and techniques that are not necessarily sustainable, requiring highly pure or hazardous input materials, significant energy budgets and complex, expensive equipment [27]. In the last few decades, there has been a significant push towards replacing expensive input materials with readily available low or negative value biomass, from coffee grounds to sugarcane bagasse, rice husk, poplar wood, palm kernel shell and coconut coir [28,29,30,31]. In parallel, significant efforts have been devoted to reducing the complexity and cost of the synthesis processes so that they could actually be scaled up, while also enhancing the properties of the resultant materials.
Heteroatom doping during biomass carbonization and activation, or the creation of composites of graphene or rGO with transition metal oxides (AB2O4), e.g., CoFe2O4, can tune the electron-donor property and electrochemical behavior of the resultant carbon-based materials [32]. Amongst promising carbon/transition metal oxide composites that can be produced using in situ doping during carbonization, magnetic nanocomposites based on spinel ferrite (MFe2O4) are attractive [28,29,30,31,32,33], particularly for supercapacitor devices and applications where their removal using an external magnetic field is desirable, e.g., in medical and photocatalytic wastewater treatment [34,35,36,37,38]. Here, the interface between carbon and metallic components [39,40], as well as finely tuned morphology, high specific surface area and high pore volume facilitates contact with fluids, and in doing so prevents particle aggregation and facilitates separation of change carrier species, with the latter two issues being known limiting factors of ferrite materials when compared to e.g., modified TiO2 and ZnO photocatalysts [41].
Herein, we investigate the potential of cobalt ferrite CoFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites via CO2 bubble template method [20]. This work builds on our previous study where the energy storage and photocatalytic performance of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles were significantly improved by immobilizing them onto the rGO nanoflake-based material platform, achieving excellent specific capacitance of 599.9 F/g (at current density of 1 Ag−1) and retention rate of 86.5% (at 2000 cycles), as well as visible light driven photocatalytic degradation efficiency of 96.5% [20]. We also demonstrated that gas bubble templating offers significant advantages over traditional hard template- and surfactant-based methods for the synthesis of natural-resource-derived rGO materials with well-developed mesoporous nanostructure in the absence of potentially harmful or expensive chemical reducing agents and stabilizers [42,43]. Most importantly, high-quality mesoporous architectures can be attained without the need of a hard template, and associated steps of sacrificial template removal (via solvent or calcination) [44] that notably increase the complexity, length, cost and environmental footprint of the preparation processes [45].
To enhance the electrochemical properties of the resultant material, the synthesis of the metal oxide is supported on the surface of rGO sheets (through the hydrothermal method). CoFe2O4 was selected as a promising electrode material, where improved properties arise from the use of two metal elements [46,47]. The prepared CoFe2O4 materials exhibit multiple oxidation states, which enables various redox reactions [48,49,50,51,52,53]. CoFe2O4 has been previously shown to be more catalytically active when compared to NiFe2O4 nanoparticles [52], whereas other studies have shown a decreased in the cell voltage of the discharging plateaus for NiFe2O4 when compared to CoFe2O4, due to differences in the free energy formation of the oxides [53].
It should be noted that NiFe2O4 has the inverse spinel structure, with Ni2+ in the more active octahedral site, and CoFe2O4 has a normal spinel structure, with Co2+ and Fe3+ occupying the tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively. The latter also has greater coercivity and higher remanence after magnetization compared to NiFe2O4 [54]. Hence, it is worth investigating how nanocomposites comprising CoFe2O4 differ from those based on NiFe2O4 fabricated using a similar method. The various characterizations related to specific capacitance, supercapacitor cyclic stability and photo-catalytic properties of thus-synthesized spinel transition metal oxides/rGO nanocomposites were analyzed and reported.

2. Materials and Synthesis Methods

Reduced graphene oxide was synthesized from coconut coir waste in a single step process without using any hazardous chemicals. Coconut coir is a by-product of the coconut industry and is a rich source of cellulose, lignin, pectin, and hemicellulose. The coconut coir was washed with tap water to remove impurities, and then washed with deionized water. The cleaned material was dried, and once dried, the material was ground to powder in a mortar and mixed with ferrocene. The mixture was carbonized in a box furnace at 300 °C for 15 min [55] to produce black-colored reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The length and temperature have previously been optimized to produce high-quality material at the lowest possible energy budget, an important feasibility criterion for scale up and industrial translation. The results of the optimization process can be found in our previously published report [31]. Briefly, the carbonization temperature of 300 °C in the presence of air was chosen to avoid mass loss and decomposition of GO material, and the formation of graphite-like material [31]. Although strictly speaking, reduced graphene oxide is synthesized from graphite powder, and the carbonaceous products synthesized from coconut coir waste should be more accurately referred to as carbon sheets, we will use rGO for simplicity and to maintain consistency with published literature on the topic of waste-derived carbonaceous materials. The formed rGO was combined with various transition metal oxides like Co3O4, CoFe2O4, and a hydrothermal process was used to produce rGO/Co3O4, rGO/CoFe2O4 composites. Briefly, for rGO/CoFe2O4 material, 0.01M (0.233 g) of Co(NO3)3·6H2O, 0.02M (0.6464 g) of Fe(NO3)2·9H2O and excess amount of urea (0.1 M) were combined in a 250 mL beaker. Then, an aliquot of the ultrasonically dispersed rGO (at the concentration of 1 mg/1 mL) was added to the mixture under stirring. Cobalt (II) nitrate hexahydrate, Iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate, urea, and ammonia solution were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Lancaster, UK). Deionized water was used as solvent in all experiments. Analytical grade ethanol and acetone were used for washing purpose.
The homogenous mixture was transferred to a stainless steel autoclave and kept for 12 h at 160 °C in a box furnace. Finally, the collected material was washed with deionized water thrice and dried overnight at 80 °C in a convection oven. Then, it was allowed to calcinate in the furnace at 300 °C for 2 h in air. Figure 1 shows the schematic representation of the synthesis procedure for the preparation of rGO/CoFe2O4. A similar protocol was used for the preparation of rGO/Co3O4 composite. For the preparation of rGO/Co3O4 composite, 0.01 M (0.233 g) of Co(NO3)3·6H2O excess amount of urea (0.1 M) was added, then the mixture was ultrasonically dispersed and transferred to an autoclave at 160 °C for 12 h in a box furnace. The final product was annealed at 300 °C for 2 h. From here on, the metal oxides and composites will be referred to as Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4, respectively.
Material Characterization. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all samples were recorded with an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Minflux II-c X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation of wavelength 0.154 nm, Tokyo, Japan) over the 2θ range of 10–80°.The morphologies of the as-prepared samples were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (performed on a JEOL JSM-6700F microscope, Tokyo, Japan). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and RAMAN spectra were collected on a Shimadzu IRPrestige-21 infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan) over the range of 4000–500cm−1 and Raman Spectroscopy (AGILTRON 1(QEB1920), Agiltron Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), respectively. UV–vis adsorption spectra were recorded using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Cary 5E, Crawley, UK) in the wavelength range of 200–1100 nm. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted using a JEM-2100 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 150 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on XPS HSA 15000 (Hemispherical Energy Analyzer PHOIBOS 225, SPECS GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The electrochemical studies were performed using an electrochemical analyzer (Biologic VSP, Seyssinet-Pariset, France).
Electrochemical Measurements. The electrochemical test was performed using the three-electrode system. Platinum wire and Ag/AgCl were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The working electrode was prepared with 3 mg of active material, 0.3 g of polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) and 0.1 mL of N-methyl pyrrolidinone (NMP) solution. The paste was coated on a nickel plate and dried for 12 h at 110 °C. The exact active mass of the material was estimated as the difference in weight between the bare and paste-coated nickel plate. Cyclic voltammogram (CV) measurements were conducted over the potential window of −0.2 to 0.6 V, with 2M of KOH solution used as the electrolyte was. The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) tests were conducted between −0.2 and −0.5 V. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.1 Hz.
The specific capacitance Cs (Fg−1) can be calculated based on the GCD measurement using the following equation:
Cs = IΔt/mΔV,
where Δt and ΔV represents the discharge time (s) and voltage range (V), respectively, I is the current (A), m is the mass of the active material (g), C is the capacitance of the entire supercapacitor, which is half of the Cs.

3. Results and Discussion

Structural and chemical analysis. The XRD patterns of the obtained Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 composites are shown in Figure 2a. It is evident that the synthesized materials are crystalline in nature. All of the peaks in the spectra for Co3O4 can be perfectly indexed to a cubic spinel phase of Co3O4 (JCPDS no. 42-1467). Discernible peaks can be seen at 2θ of 31.4, 37.2, 39.1, 45.3, 56.2, 59.9 and 65.7, corresponding to (220), (311), (400), (511) and (440), respectively. In the case of CoFe2O4, the diffraction peaks were assigned in accordance with the JCPDS no. 10-0325. The main diffraction peaks of CoFe2O4 spectra appeared at 30.1, 35.7, 43.2, 54.2, 57.3, 62.6 and 74.8, corresponding to (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440) and (310), respectively. For the rGO/Co3O4 nanocomposites, the spectra show clear peaks at 31.3, 37.01, 38.5, 44.8, 55.7, 59.5 and 65.4. The observed shift towards the lower angle with lowering the peak intensity is due to the peak broadening, which is attributed to the presence of rGO with Co3O4. For rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites, the peaks are evident at 30.07, 35.6, 43.2, 53.9, 57.3, 62.6 and 74.2, indicating peak shift towards the lower angle. Meanwhile, for both composites, the reflection peak that corresponds to (002) plain of the layered rGO has disappeared. It is speculated that the reduced graphene oxide in the rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 was fully exfoliated due to the crystal growth of Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 between the layers of the rGO sheets [31,56].
The lattice constant (a) and cell volume were calculated from XRD data, with the results shown in Table 1. The crystallite size was found to be in the range of 11.7 to 8.7nm. Briefly, the average crystallite sizes for all the synthesized nano ferrite samples were calculated using the Scherrer’s equation:
D = 0.9λ/β × cos(θ),
where λ is the wavelength of X-ray radiation, β is full width half maximum (FWHM) in radian and θ is the diffraction angle.
Various peaks have been used from XRD pattern to understand the peak broadening with lattice strain. Equation (2) represents the Stokes and Wilson approach to calculate the strain induced broadening of the Bragg’s diffraction peak:
ε = β(hkl) × cos(θ)/4sin(θ).
The Willamson–Hall (WH) plots were then used to calculate the values of the grain size and strain, and the results of these calculations are tabulated in Table 1. It was observed that the crystallite sizes of Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 decreased with the changes in the lattice strain, due to which the peaks were also shifted to lower angle. It is important to mention that the crystallite size depends on the lattice strain and plays an important role in the overall properties of the nano-structure materials.
Firstly, as the crystallite size decreased, the grain boundary volume also increased with more volume defects associated with it. Secondly, with the reduction in the crystallite size, the pressure arising from the surface tension of crystallite interfaces induced stress fields that resulted in the lattice strain. From Table 1, it is apparent that in the case of rGO/Co3O4 samples, the crystallite size is 11.6 nm, and hence, much larger than the crystallite size of rGO/CoFe2O4 samples (8.7 nm). On the other hand, the surface tension-induced pressure creates a stress field in rGO/CoFe2O4 due to small crystallite size, and this in turn results in a compressive lattice strain. However, since the crystallite size is larger in rGO/Co3O4, more volume defects are associated with the grain boundaries and as a result, this ultimately exerted tensile lattice strain [57]. The presence of more defects in rGO/Co3O4 over rGO/CoFe2O4 boosted the faradaic redox reactions, and this clearly indicates that the atomic level strain effects played an important role in tuning the electrochemical properties of the developed composites, as it is discussed in the Electrochemical section below. Even though rGO/Co3O4 composites have a great number of defects, the rGO/CoFe2O4 samples showed good electrochemical and photo-catalytic performance due to the crystallize size in the rGO/CoFe2O4.
The FTIR spectra of Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 are shown in Figure 2b. The peaks at 1712 and 2935 cm−1 are assigned to the bending vibration of the C=C aromatic ring of rGO and the aliphatic C-H groups, respectively. The broad peak at 3336 cm−1 is the OH stretching vibration mode of OH group. In the CO spectrum, the two distinct and sharp peaks at 552.6 and 656.6 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibrations of the Co2+ metal ions [58,59]. The absorption peaks at 1625 and 3349.6 cm−1 of rGO/Co3O4 composite clearly indicates the Co3O4 were successfully decorated on the surface of rGO sheets. The existence of the C=C peak in the spectra of all the rGO based samples suggests that the sp2 structure of the carbon atom was retained. The absorption peak at 545.4 cm−1 corresponds to the octahedral site Fe–O bond and tetrahedral site Co–O bond of the CoFe2O4. The spectrum of rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite exhibits the characteristic peaks due to CoFe2O4 and rGO at 559 cm−1 and 3336 cm−1, respectively.
To further confirm the chemical composition of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 composites, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were analyzed. The XPS spectra for rGO fabricated from coconut coir under similar conditions has previously been reported elsewhere [60,61]. Figure 2c shows the typical XPS survey spectra for the rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoF2O4, which reveal the presence of Co2p, Fe2p, O1s, C1s and of Co2p, O1s, C1s in rGO/CoF2O4 and rGO/Co3O4, respectively. Figure 2d–g shows the typical high-resolution spectra for Co2p, Fe2p, C1s and O1s collected for the rGO/CoFe2O4 composite. The survey spectrum of rGO/Co3O4 exhibited the peak at 282.7 eV corresponds to the C1s, 529.2 eV corresponds to the O 1s, and the peaks at 777.8 and 794eV corresponding to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, respectively. The core level spectrum for Co exhibited two peaks corresponding to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 at 780.6 and 795.7 eV, respectively, with two satellite peaks at 786.7 and 802.9 eV, respectively, which proved the Co2+ valance states [23]. The core level spectrum of Fe2p shows the peaks at 711.2 and 724.5 corresponding to the Fe 2p3/2 and 2p1/2, respectively. In the C1s spectrum, the peak observed at 284.2 eV corresponds to the C–C/C=C bond and the peak at 291.0 eV is attributed to the O–C=O bond. The peak at 529.1 eV can be attributed to the metal-oxygen-carbon bond, suggesting some covalent bonding with the rGO sheets. The other peaks at 531 and 534.2 eV are associated with the metal-hydroxide (M–OH) bonds [62,63]. Hence, the XPS results confirm the formation of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites.
Morphological analysis. The morphology of the synthesized materials was analyzed with the scanning electron microscopy. Figure 3a–d shows the representative SEM images of the Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4 samples. Visualization of Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 samples shows a flake-like morphology of the metal oxide particles that are homogeneous in shape, size, and how they are distributed within the mass of the material. In contrast, in the case of composites, the surfaces of rGO sheets are decorated with the metal oxide flakes. The closer observations concerning the morphology and the structure of thus-prepared materials were carried out by transmission electron microscope, which are shown in the Figure 3e–h. The incorporated nature of rGO and metal oxide nanoflakes in rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 samples is clearly visible in the TEM images. SEM image of pure rGO flakes is shown in Figure S1, Supplementary Materials (SM).
Optical characterization. The optical properties of obtained nanomaterial were investigated with UV–Vis spectroscopy. Figure 4a,b shows the UV–Vis absorbance spectra of the Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite samples. The absorption broad peak around 291.1 nm confirms the formation of reduced graphene oxide from the coconut coir waste, in alignment with previously reported results for coconut coir-derived rGO by our group [31]. The presence of the two UV–vis absorption bands at ~486 nm is ascribed to Co3O4 nanomaterial. The absorption peak corresponds to a charge transfer transition from O2− to Co2+, i.e., band to band transition. The peak blue shift of band at 477 nm evidences that the cobalt oxide nanoflakes have been anchored onto the rGO sheets, suggesting a strong interaction between rGO and Co3O4 nanocomposites. The optical absorption spectra of the CoFe2O4 show the absorption peak at around 396 nm [64]. After incorporation with the rGO, the 396 nm peak shifted to the 331.6 nm, which evidences that rGO is not only a solid support, but also interacts chemically with the metal atoms [65,66]. Further, absorption spectroscopy plays an important role for the determination of the band gap value of the materials. It has been observed from the Figure S2 (SM) that the band gap values of the as-synthesized materials are 1.7, 1.3, 2.41, 2.48 eV for Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4, respectively [67,68]. The spectrum for rGO flakes is shown in Figure S3 (SM).
Figure 4c,d shows the transient photocurrent measurement to investigate the charge separation and transfer efficiency through the visible light on and off region. The plots represent the photocurrent response in samples over several ON–OFF cycles. It is worth noting that despite repeated testing of ON–OFF response, the photocurrent response was found to remain similar. From the obtained results, it is evident that the photocurrent response for pure Co3O4 and CoFe2O4is very weak compared to that of their respective composites made with rGO. When rGO is integrated into the composite matrix, the improvement in the photocurrent response is attributed to an increase in the photocurrent density, illustrating that the photogenerated holes (h+) can be effectively separated from e− in the rGO-metaloxide composite, which results in better photocatalytic performance.
Raman Analysis. The Raman spectra of Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 nanomaterials are shown in Figure 5a,b. It is known that Raman scattering is very sensitive to the microstructure of nanocrystalline materials, therefore here it is also used to further clarify the structure of the Co3O4 and CoFe2O4. In the case of Co3O4, the peaks at 512 and 677.0 cm−1 indicate the spinel structure of Co3O4. The Raman peaks are caused by the spinel structure’s lattice vibrations of Co2+ and Co3+ cations located in the tetrahedral and octahedral sites of the cubic lattice, respectively. From the group theory analysis, 39 normal modes of vibrations are predicted for the spinel structure; out of these modes, A1g (648–680 cm−1), Eg (278–293 cm−1), and T2g (539–565 cm−1 and 449–471 cm−1) are Raman active. From Figure 5 it is evident that the CoFe2O4 samples show Raman peaks at 273.3, 400.4, 510.4, and 680 cm−1, which can be assigned to the stretching vibrations of the Fe–O and Co–O bonds in the tetrahedral site of cobalt ferrite. The T2g and Eg Raman modes are assigned to the lower frequency Raman modes, demonstrating the spinel structure. Additionally, the Raman intensity of the peaks at 1352.2 cm−1 (D-band) and 1522 cm−1 (G-band) in the composites is significantly lower than the bare metal oxides CoFe2O4 and Co3O4.
Mechanism of CoFe2O4 growth on rGO sheets. A mechanism for the assembly of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 composites was proposed based on the outcomes of morphological, structural and chemical characterization. The assembly on metal oxide flakes on the surfaces of reduced graphene oxide sheets was generally achieved by using a hydrothermal technique with urea as a structure-directing agent [20,69,70,71]. Several investigations on the use of urea’s structure-directing property to develop metal oxides on rGO have been published, in which metal nitrates are alkalized and then hydrolyzed with NH3·H2O using the inductive effect provided by the hydrothermal process [20]. However, reports on the use of CO2 soft bubble template technology for this purpose are infrequent, and reports on spinel nanostructures on rGO grown in this way are not readily available. When NH3·H2O is added to a solution containing metal ions (Co2+, Fe3+), the lone pair of electrons in the NH3·H2O solution complexes with the metal ions to form [CoFe(H2O)6-x (NH3)x]2+. This allows some configurational ions to be released back into the solution. When the temperature reaches 80 °C, the urea is hydrolyzed, releasing CO2 and NH3 liquid interfaces into the aqueous solution. The generated NH3 further drives the ionization of NH3·H2O to generate OH−. The generated CO2 bubbles are supported on rGO, and these CO2 bubbles on rGO act as a template for metal oxide formation. At high temperature and pressure, Fe3+ is reduced to Fe(OH)3 which converts into FeOOH. Now the precipitated Co(OH)2 reacts with FeOOH to form CoFe2O4 at hydrothermal conditions.
NH3 + H2O ↔ NH3⋅H2O ↔ NH4+ + OH−
Co2+ + xNH3 + (6−x) H2O ↔ [CoFe(H2O)6−x (NH3)x]2+
CO(NH2)2 + H2O → 2NH3↑ + CO2↑
Co2+ + 2OH− → Co(OH)2 ↓
Fe3+ + 3OH− → Fe(OH)3↓
Fe(OH)3 → β-FeOOH + H2O
β-FeOOH + Co(OH)2 → CoFe2O4↓+ H2O
Under prolonged hydrothermal conditions, the produced bubbles act as a soft template on which the Co(OH)2 and FeOOH aggregate to form CoFe2O4. Due to the orientation attachment, the crystal developed along a certain orientation during calcination at 350 °C for 2 h, resulting in nanoflakes. The formation of the metal oxide nanoflake is schematically illustrated in Figure 6.
Electrochemical analysis. CV was used to characterize the electrochemical behavior of the synthesized materials. The materials show pseudo-capacitance behavior because of the cobalt and iron ions of Co3O4 and CoFe2O4, which is confirmed by the nonlinear plot of CV curves shown in Figure 7a,c. The effect of scan rate on the specific and interfacial capacitance has been studied at the rates of 10, 25, 50, 100 and 300 mV/s. The voltametric currents are increased with the scan rate, which indicates the pseudocapacitive nature of the as synthesized materials. The specific capacitance is obtained by dividing the mass of electrode dipped, whereas interfacial by dividing area of the electrode dipped in the electrolyte. The redox peak around at 0.31 V indicate the reversible redox reaction of the Co2+/Co3+ and Fe3+/Fe4+ in alkaline electrolyte. In the case of Co3O4, the redox peak is narrow than the bimetallic materials. The specific capacitance decreased with increasing scan rate because of the of inner active sites at the electrode surface not being able to maintain redox transitions as the scan rate increases. The redox reaction can be expressed by the following reactions:
Co3O4 + OH− ↔ CoOOH + e−
CoFe2O4 + OH− + H2O ↔ CoOOH + 2FeOOH + e−
CoOOH + OH− ↔ FeO2 + H2O + e−
The GCD curves are demonstrated in the Figure 7b,d and Figure S4, and the resulting nonlinear graphs indicate pseudocapacitive behavior for both Co3O4 and CoFe2O4. In contrast, in the case of composites, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 display both pseudocapacitive and EDLC capacitive behavior. Here, the discharging time is higher than that for pure metal oxide materials, with a negligible IR drop due to the hybrid storage mechanism. The interactions between the electrolyte and electrode materials are also high because of the sheet-like morphology of both rGO and metal oxides. The specific capacitance of the as-synthesized materials was estimated to be 71.8, 220, 166 and 396 F/g for Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4, respectively, as shown in Figure 8. The specific capacitance of the rGO/CoFe2O4 is higher than rGO/Co3O4 due to the number of redox reactions involved in the rGO/CoFe2O4 because of its binary metal oxide nature and rGO also offer large surface area. Furthermore, this composite is highly porous in nature, as can be seen from the microscopy images.
Figure 8 also shows the cyclic stability of the rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at 2 A/g. The capacitance properties of the materials reduce very slightly at the high number of cycles, with excellent retention of 95.6%, which confirms excellent cyclic stability of the prepared materials. Furthermore, the enhanced electrochemical properties of the materials were analyzed with the Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS). Nyquist plots (Figure S5) consist of two parts, a semicircle in the high-frequency region and a nearly straight line in the low-frequency (Warburg impedance region). The radius of the semicircle represents the charge transfer resistance, while the slope of the line indicates the diffusive resistance. The small semicircle and high slope of the line confirm efficient electron transport. Among the four sample types, rGO/CoFe2O4 electrodes exhibited small charge transfer resistance, as seen in Figure 8, suggesting high electrical conductivity. These results can be due to the hybrid structure of rGO and CoFe2O4 nanoparticle integration, which could promote rapid electron and electrolyte transportation at the electrode surface. An intercept at high-frequency region with the real part (Z−) is attributable to a combinational resistance. The combinational resistance includes the ionic resistance of the electrolyte, the intrinsic resistance of the active material, and the contact resistance of the active material and the current collector. The combinational resistance found to be 7.6 Ω, 6.2 Ω, 5.46 Ω and 5.36 Ω for Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4, respectively. Collectively, these results suggest that rGO/CoFe2O4 has good electrochemical properties.
Photochemical analysis. The photo-degradation potential of thus-synthesized materials was analyzed by measuring the degradation of malachite green (MG) dye in aqueous solution in the visible light photo-reactor. To assess the photocatalytic degradation process, a small amount of the photocatalyst was added to an aliquot of MG dye solution. This solution was placed in the dark with stirring to attain adsorption–desorption equilibrium for about 30 min, and then placed under visible light irradiation. During the irradiation stage, small volumes of the aqueous reaction mixture were drawn at intervals of 30 min and their UV–Vis absorption spectra collected at the corresponding wavelength of λmax = 665 nm. A reduction in the magnitude of the absorption peak indicates the degradation of MG dye. The degradation percentage of the dye was calculated by using the following relation:
E = [1 − At/A0] × 100,
where At is the absorbance at the time interval t, A0 is the absorbance at t = 0 min. The rate constant of photocatalytic degradation of MG for each material was obtained from the Equation (4), with the results summarized in Table 2.
Figure S6 shows the photocatalytic activity of Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 for the degradation of MG dye under the visible light irradiation. For Co3O4 and CoFe2O4, the degradation rate was only around 65% within 120 min, while for rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4, more than 80% of MG were degraded. This is because rGO acts as an acceptor of the electrons generated in the metal oxide, which is suppressing the recombination of charges. The effect of pH on MG dye was studied at a fixed dye concentration and weight of the catalyst, with the solution pH varied from 3 to 11, as shown in Figure 9. The efficiency of photodegradation of MG dye linearly increases from pH 3 to 11. Malachite Green dye is a cationic dye, so in the case of the lower pH range (>7) repulsion will take place between the dye and the photocatalyst, with the breaking of the dye molecules becoming more difficult. In contrast, in the case of higher pH, the degradation takes place very easily due to the basic nature of the dye solution. This is clearly shown in the Figure S7.
The kinetic performance of the nanoflakes for the degradation of MG dye was then analyzed using the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model (Equation (5)). Figure S7 gives the chemical kinetics for the removal of MG dye that fits the pseudo-first order kinetic model ln C/Co = kt, where C is the initial absorbance of MG dye at time t = 0, Co is the change in absorbance of MG dye at selected intervals of degradation, and k is the first-order rate constant.
The plot of ln C/Co versus irradiation time gives the rate constant value from the obtained slope. Figure S8 illustrates that the photocatalytic reaction rate constants (k) for Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4, were 0.00436, 0.00592, 0.00513 and 0.00667 min−1, respectively.
These results reveal that the efficiency of the photocatalytic activity of rGO/CoFe2O4 and rGO/Co3O4 photocatalysts is increased with the incorporation of rGO sheets. The photocatalytic activity of the rGO/CoFe2O4 nanoflakes with the k value of 0.00667 min−1 is higher than those for the other three materials under the visible light illumination. The enhancement in the efficiency of photodegradation was observed for rGO/CoFe2O4 with the superior active surface area, which shows a greater degree of decolorizations for MG dye.
Mechanism of dye photodegradation. The diagrammatic representation of the MG dye degradation pathway is explained in Figure 10. In a typical process, when the visible light irradiates the material, the electrons (e−) migrate from the conduction band (CB) to valence band (VB). Then, the holes (h+) are created in the valence band. The holes react with hydroxyl (OH−) coming from water to form •OH radicals. These •OH radicals can attack the bonds of the functional group of MG dye. In the case of pure CoFe2O4 and Co3O4, there is no external charge carrier, and so the delocalized electrons are rapidly recombined with the holes produced in the conduction band prior to being captured by OH−, prohibiting the further dye degradation. On the other hand, rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 nanocomposites act as charge carrier due to the presence of rGO that could effectively confine the delocalized electrons and consequently prevent the recombination of electrons and holes. On the basis of above-mentioned factors, the holes in the CB have greater possibility to react with OH− to produce OH• radicals. A much higher dye degradation performance was observed for the rGO/CoFe2O4 and rGO/Co3O4 nanocomposites. The adsorption of MG dye is supported on the surface of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 due to π–π interaction between aromatic domain of the MG dye and rGO nanosheets. The rGO nanosheet prevents the electron hole recombination in Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 as it acts as photoelectron acceptor and as such promotes an effective photocatalytic degradation of MG molecules. The functional group can be substituted by an •OH radical forming the corresponding functional products. The sulfoxide group of dye molecule can undergo a second attack by an •OH radical producing the sulfone and causing the definitive dissociation of the two benzenic rings. Finally, an almost complete mineralization of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur hetero-atoms occurred into CO2, NH4+, NO3.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the few layered reduced graphene oxide was synthesized from coconut coir waste with a single step method. Then, the rGO/MO nanoflakes were obtained via a simple hydrothermal method, where CO2 bubbles formed as a result of urea decomposition played an important role of a template during metal oxide flake synthesis in the surface of rGO. The as-prepared Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 yielded specific capacitances of 71.8 and 220 F/g at 1 A/g. The obtained rGO was employed as advanced support to grow CoFe2O4 and Co3O4 for achieving ideal capacitive performances. The optimal rGO/CoFe2O4 composite delivered 396 F/g at 1 A/g, and demonstrated excellent cycling performance, with 94.5% of the capacitance retained after 2000 cycles. The few layered rGO nanosheets offer high surface area leading to high electrical conductivity and improved mechanical and cyclic stability of the composites. Therefore, the ultrahigh specific capacitance occurs due to the effective utilization of active material CoFe2O4 on the conductive rGO sheets. The photocatalytic results show that rGO/CoFe2O4 and rGO/Co3O4 are excellent photocatalysts for the visible light photodegradation of MG dyes compared to bare Co3O4 and CoFe2O4 catalysts. This work is of particular interest to those working in the area of valorization of biomass waste, who look to enhance the properties of biomass-derived advanced materials and expand their potential applications in the area of green energy and environmental remediation, hence fully embracing the concept of “Waste to Treasure”.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12213822/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of pure rGO flakes; Figure S2: Tauc plots for (a) Co2O3 and rGO/Co2O3, and (b) CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4. Absorption data obtained using UV-Vis spectroscopy. Eg estimated as the intercept (y=0) between the linear fit to plot generated using the Tauc equation αhν= B (hν − Eg)n, where α is the optical absorbance, ν is the frequency of light, and n and B correspond to the type of transition and the length of localized state tails respectively; Figure S3: Spectrum for rGO flakes; Figure S4: (a, c) Representative CV curves for Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4 samples at different scan rates. (b, d) Representative CP curves for Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4 samples at different current density; Figure S5: Nyquist plots; Figure S6: Degradation of MG dye solution under visible light irradiation as a function of solution pH; Figure S7: Changes in the visible spectra of MG at different irradiation time; Figure S8: Photocatalytic activities (PDF).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.R., M.M.; Methodology, T.R, M.M.; Validation, K.B., M.M.; Formal analysis, T.R.; Investigation, T.R.; Resources, M.M.; data curation, V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.R.; funding acquisition, M.M.; writing—review and editing, T.R., L.G.S., O.B., I.L., K.B., V.S., M.M.; visualization, L.G.S., I.L.; supervision, M.M., K.B.; project administration, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Yrjälä, K.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Salo, E. Agricultural waste streams as resource in circular economy for biochar production towards carbon neutrality. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2022, 26, 100339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bazaka, O.; Prasad, K.; Levchenko, I.; Jacob, M.V.; Bazaka, K.; Kingshott, P.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Decontamination-induced modification of bioactivity in essential oil-based plasma polymer coatings. Molecules 2021, 26, 7133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El-Deeb, Z.M.; Aboutaleb, W.A.; Dhmees, A.S.; El Naggar, A.M.A.; Emara, K.; Elgendy, A.T.; Ahmed, A.I. Bio-fuels production through waste tires pyrolytic oil upgrading over Ni-W/zeolite composites derived from blast furnace slag. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 17376–17390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhattarai, R.M.; Chhetri, K.; Saud, S.; Teke, S.; Kim, S.J.; Mok, Y.S. Eco-friendly synthesis of cobalt molybdenum hydroxide 3d nanostructures on carbon fabric coupled with cherry flower waste-derived activated carbon for quasi-solid-state flexible asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Piferi, C.; Carra, C.; Bazaka, C.; Roman, H.E.; Dell’Orto, E.C.; Morandi, V.; Levchenko, I.; Riccardi, C. Controlled deposition of nanostructured hierarchical TiO2 thin films by low pressure supersonic plasma jets. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Z.; Zheng, J.; Duan, L.; Zhu, Z. Biomass-assisted synthesis of CeO2 nanorods for CO2 photoreduction under visible light. Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 4226–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Levchenko, I.; Mandhakini, M.; Prasad, K.; Bazaka, O.; Ivanova, E.P.; Jacob, M.V.; Baranov, O.; Riccardi, C.; Roman, H.E.; Xu, S.; et al. Functional nanomaterials from waste and low-value natural products: A technological approach level. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Levchenko, I.; Xu, S.; Baranov, O.; Bazaka, O.; Ivanova, E.P.; Bazaka, K. Plasma and polymers: Recent progress and trends. Molecules 2021, 26, 4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tahir, M.H.; Mubashir, M.H.; Schulze, M.; Irfan, R.M. Thermochemical conversion of cabbage waste to bioenergy and bio-chemicals production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, J.; Yan, B.; Feng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Yang, W.; Han, J.; Jiang, S.; He, S. Potassium citrate assisted synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon materials for high performance supercapacitors. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2022, 128, 109247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, S.; Zhang, J.; Deng, H.; Du, Y.; Shi, X. Chitin derived nitrogen-doped porous carbons with ultrahigh specific surface area and tailored hierarchical porosity for high performance supercapacitors. J. Biores. Bioprod. 2021, 6, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.; Jiang, S.; Jiang, H. A review on conversion of crayfish-shell derivatives to functional materials and their environmental applications. J. Biores. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carra, C.; Medvids, A.; Litvinas, D.; Sčajev, P.; Malinauskas, T.; Selskis, A.; Roman, H.E.; Bazaka, K.; Levchenko, I.; Riccardi, C. Hierarchical carbon nanocone-silica metamaterials: Implications for white light photoluminescence. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 4787–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, F.; Yu, Y.; Xu, C.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Bi, X. Atomic-layer-deposited ZnO/Al2O3 nanolaminates for white-light-emitting diodes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 8730–8734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alancherry, S.; Bazaka, K.; Levchenko, I.; Al-Jumaili, A.; Kandel, B.; Alex, A.; Hernandez, F.C.R.; Varghese, O.K.; Jacob, M.V. Fabrication of nano-onion-structured graphene films from citrus sinensis extract and their wetting and sensing characteristics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 29594–29604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, T.; Wang, B.; Qi, Z.; Guo, Z.; Tian, Y.; Meng, F. Coatings comprised of graphene oxide decorated with helical polypyrrole nanofibers for microwave absorption and corrosion protection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 9780–9791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, A.; Aljumaili, A.; Bazaka, O.; Ivanova, E.P.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K.; Jacob, M. Functional nanomaterials, synergism and biomimicry for environmentally benign marine antifouling technology. Mater. Horiz. 2021, 8, 3201–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kharisov, B.I.; Dias, H.V.R.; Kharissova, O.V. Mini-review: Ferrite nanoparticles in the catalysis. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 1234–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Joseph, H.M.; Sugunan, S.; Gurrala, L.; Mohan, M.K.; Gopi, S. New insights into surface functionalization and preparation methods of MWCNT based semiconductor photocatalyst. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 14490–14499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tamilselvi, R.; Lekshmi, G.S.; Padmanathan, N.; Selvaraj, V.; Bazaka, O.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K.; Mandhakini, M. NiFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites produced by soft bubble assembly for energy storage and environmental remediation. Renew. Energy 2022, 181, 1386–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sree, G.V.; Rajasekaran, P.; Bazaka, O.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K.; Mandhakini, M. Biowaste Valorization by conversion to nanokeratin-urea composite fertilizers for sustainable and controllable release of carbon and nitrogen. Carbon Trends 2021, 5, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deshmukh, S.; Jakobczyk, P.; Ficek, M.; Ryl, J.; Geng, D.; Bogdanowicz, R. Tuning the laser-induced processing of 3D porous graphenic nanostructures by boron-doped diamond particles for flexible microsupercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2206097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lei, J.; Liu, J.; Tang, N.; Han, H.; Li, Z.; Li, K.; Zhai, T.; Chen, H.; Xia, H. Novel gram-scale synthesis of carbon nano-onions from heavy oil for supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 2101208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tamilselvi, R.; Padmanathan, N.; Mani Rahulan, K.; Mohana Priya, P.; Sasikumar, R.; Mandhakini, M. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO): Supported NiO, Co3O4 and NiCo2O4 hybrid composite on carbon cloth (CC)—Bi-functional electrode/catalyst for energy storage and conversion devices. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 29, 4869–4880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, B.; Zheng, J.; Feng, L.; Du, C.; Jian, S.; Yang, W.; Wu, Y.A.; Jiang, S.; He, S.; Chen, W. Wood-derived biochar as thick electrodes for high-rate performance supercapacitors. Biochar 2022, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fahmi, F.; Dewayanti, N.A.A.; Widiyastuti, W.; Setyawan, H. Preparation of porous graphene-like material from coconut shell charcoals for supercapacitors. Cogent Eng. 2020, 7, 1748962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, P.; Minh, N.Q. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Technology Status. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2004, 1, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yadav, K.K.; Singh, H.; Rana, S.; Suniana; Sammi, H.; Nishanthi, S.T.; Wadhwa, R.; Khan, N.; Jha, M. Utilization of waste coir fibre architecture to synthesize porous graphene oxide and their derivatives: An efficient energy storage material. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Younes, H.; Zou, L. Asymmetric configuration of pseudocapacitive composite and rGO electrodes for enhanced capacitive deionization. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Younes, H.; Ravaux, F.; Hadri, N.E.; Zou, L. Nanostructuring of pseudocapacitive MnFe2O4/Porous rGO electrodes in capacitive deionization. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 306, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tamilselvi, R.; Ramesh, M.; Lekshmi, G.S.; Bazaka, O.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K.; Mandhakini, M. Graphene oxide–based supercapacitors from agricultural wastes: A step to mass production of highly efficient electrodes for electrical transportation systems. Renew. Energy 2020, 151, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Yu, J.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Xie, J. Graphene in photocatalysis: A review. Small 2016, 12, 6640–6696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, L.; Huang, T.; Qin, L. Highly active S-modified ZnFe2O4 heterogeneous catalyst and its photo Fenton behavior under UVA visible irradiation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 7219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zafar, Q.; Azmer, M.I.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Al-Assiri, M.S.; Kalam, A.; Sulaiman, K. Evaluation of humidity sensing properties of TMBHPET thin film embedded with spinel cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paulsen, J.A.; Ring, A.P.; Lo, C.C.H.; Snyder, J.E.; Jiles, D.C. Manganese substituted cobalt ferrite magnetostrictive materials for magnetic stress sensor applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 044502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, H.S.; Zhang, Y.P.; Wang, S.Y.; Wu, Q.; Liu, C.H. Study on nanomagnets supported TiO2 photocatalysts prepared by a sol–gel process in reverse microemulsion combining with solventthermal technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, L.; Peng, X.; Ni, F.; Li, J.; Wang, D.; Luan, Z. Arsenite removal from aqueous solutions by c-Fe2O3-TiO2 magnetic nanoparticles through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 246, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xin, T.; Ma, M.; Zhang, H.; Gu, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Q. A facile approach for the synthesis of magnetic separable Fe3O4@TiO2, core–shell nanocomposites as highly recyclable photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 288, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Levchenko, I.; Baranov, O.; Riccardi, C.; Roman, H.E.; Cvelbar, U.; Ivanova, E.; Mandhakini, M.; Ščajev, P.; Malinauskas, T.; Xu, S.; et al. Nanoengineered carbon-based interfaces for advanced energy and photonics applications: A recent progress and innovations. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Piferi, C.; Bazaka, K.; D’Aversa, D.L.; Di Girolamo, R.; De Rosa, C.; Roman, H.E.; Riccardi, C.; Levchenko, I. Hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity control of plasma-treated surfaces via fractal parameters. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 2100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Casbeer, E.; Sharma, V.K.; Li, X.-Z. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of ferrites under visible light: A review. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2012, 87, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Q.; Wang, W.; Goebl, J.; Yina, Y. Self-templated synthesis of hollow nanostructures. Nano Today 2009, 4, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zeng, W.; Huang, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, N.; Xu, C.; Huang, L. Gas bubble templated synthesis of Mn3O4-embedded hollow carbon nanospheres in ethanol flame for elastic supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Hu, O.S.W.; Wang, J. Robust amino-functionalized mesoporous silica hollow spheres templated by CO2 bubbles. Molecules 2022, 27, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, L.; Yu, X.Y.; Lou, X.W.D. The design and synthesis of hollow micro-/nanostructures: Present and future trends. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pileni, M.P. Magnetic fluids: Fabrication, magnetic properties and organization of nanocrystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2001, 11, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, D.H.; Nikles, D.E.; Jhonson, D.T.; Brazel, C.S. Heat generation of aqueously dispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles as heating agents for magnetically activated drug delivery and hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Erdem, D.; Bingham, N.S.; Heiligtag, F.J.; Pilet, N.; Warnicke, P.; Heyderman, L.J.; Niederberger, M. CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4-SiO2 nanoparticle thin films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for magnetic and magneto-optical applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmed, J.; Alshehri, S.M.; Alhabarah, A.N.; Ahmad, T.; Ahmad, T. Nitrogen doped cobalt ferrite/carbon (NCFC) nanocomposites for supercapacitor application. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Samavati, A.; Ismail, A.F. Antibacterial properties of copper-substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Particuology 2017, 30, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ren, H.; Li, Y.; Ni, Q.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wu, C. Unraveling anionic redox for sodium layered oxide cathodes: Breakthroughs and perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2106171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mahala, C.; Sharma, M.D.; Basu, M. 2D nanostructures of CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4: Efficient oxygen evolution catalyst. Electrochem. Acta 2018, 273, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lavela, P.; Tirado, J.L. CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 synthesized by sol–gel procedures for their use as anode materials for Li ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2007, 172, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karthigayan, N.; Manimuthu, P.; Priya, M.; Sagadevan, S. Synthesis and characterization of NiFe2O4, CoFe2O4 and CuFe2O4 thin films for anode material in Li-ion batteries. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2017, 7, 1847980417711084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Geng, S.J.; Zhu, J.H. Promising alloys for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell interconnect application. J. Power Sources 2006, 160, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fu, M.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhuang, Q.; Chen, W.; Liu, Q. Microwave deposition synthesis of Ni(OH)2/sorghum stalk biomass carbon electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 782, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shafi, P.M.; Bose, A.C. Impact of crystalline defects and size on X-ray line broadening: A phenomenological approach for tetragonal SnO2 nanocrystals. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 057137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, H.; Hai, Z.; Diwu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, L.; Cui, D.; Zang, J.; Liu, J.; Xue, C. Synthesis and microwave absorption properties of core-shell structured Co3O4-PANI nanocomposites. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 845983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Bhargava, R.; Khana, S.; Ahmad, N.; Ansari, M.M.N. Investigation of structural, optical and electrical properties of Co3O4 nanoparticles. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1953, 030034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, K.; Lee, T.H.; Cha, J.H.; Jang, H.W.; Choi, J.-W.; Mahmoudi, M.; Shokouhimehr, M. Metal-organic framework-derived metal oxide nanoparticles@reduced graphene oxide composites as cathode materials for rechargeable aluminium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yue, X.M.; Liu, Z.J.; Xiao, C.-C.; Ye, M.; Ge, Z.-P.; Peng, C.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Zhu, J.-S.; Zhang, S.-Q. Synthesis of Co3O4/reduced graphene oxide by one step-hydrothermal and calcination method for high-performance supercapacitors. Ionics 2021, 27, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Anamika, S.; Himanshu, G.; Dehiya, B.S. Synthesis and microstructural characterization of pure cobalt ferrite for D.C. Electrical study. J. Mater. Sci. Mechan. Eng. 2017, 4, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ravindra, A.V.; Padhan, P.; Prellier, W. Electronic structure and optical band gap of CoFe2O4 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 161902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Khalil, L.; Eid, C.; Bechelany, M.; Abboud, N.; Khoury, A.; Miele, P. Design of CoFe2O4/Co3O4 nanofibers with tunable morphology by Electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2015, 140, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bo, W.; Songmei, L.; Jianhua, L.; Mei, Y.; Bin, L.; Xiaoyu, W. An efficient route to a hierarchical CoFe2O4@graphene hybrid films with superior cycling stability and rate capability for lithium storage. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 146, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Quadakkers, W.J.; Piron-Abellan, J.; Shemet, V.; Singheiser, L. Metallic interconnectors for solid oxide fuel cells–A review. Mater. High Temp. 2003, 20, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Niveditha, C.V.; Aswini, R.; Jabeen, F.M.J.; Ramanarayan, R.; Pullanjiyot, N.; Swaminathan, S. Feather like highly active Co3O4 electrode for supercapacitor application: A potentiodynamic approach. Mater. Res. Exp. 2018, 5, 065501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hafeez, H.Y.; Lakhera, S.K.; Narayanan, N.; Harish, S.; Hayakawa, Y.; Lee, B.K.; Neppolian, B. Environmentally sustainable synthesis of a CoFe2O4–TiO2/rGO ternary photocatalyst: A highly efficient and stable photocatalyst for high production of hydrogen (solar fuel). ACS Omega 2019, 4, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Wang, L.; Feng, S.; Fang, D.; Xu, W.; Wei, H.; Qi, L.; Ren, W. Novel urea-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of tetrametallic Co6Fe4Mo12Bi1.5Ox phase for the selective oxidation of tert-butyl alcohol to methacrolein. Catal. Commun. 2019, 130, 105762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsoncheva, T.; Ivanova, R.; Henych, J.; Dimitrov, M.; Kormunda, M.; Kovacheva, D.; Scotti, N.; Santo, V.D.; Štengl, V. Effect of preparation procedure on the formation of nanostructured ceria–zirconia mixed oxide catalysts for ethyl acetate oxidation: Homogeneous precipitation with urea vs template-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2015, 502, 418–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pallavolu, M.R.; Banerjee, A.N.; Nallapureddy, R.R.; Joo, S.W. Urea-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of MnMoO4/MnCO3 hybrid electrochemical electrode and fabrication of high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor. J. Mater. Sci.Technol. 2022, 96, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental flow for the synthesis of rGO/CoFe2O4 composite.
Figure 1. Experimental flow for the synthesis of rGO/CoFe2O4 composite.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g001
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) FTIR spectra for Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4. The broadening of the peaks in composites is due to interactions between flakes of rGO and metal oxides. rGO is derived from coconut coir waste. (c) Survey spectra of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 materials. (d–g) High-resolution XPS spectra for rGO/CoFe2O4 composite material: (d) Co 2p, (e) Fe 2p, (f) C 1s, and (g) O 1s.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) FTIR spectra for Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4. The broadening of the peaks in composites is due to interactions between flakes of rGO and metal oxides. rGO is derived from coconut coir waste. (c) Survey spectra of rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 materials. (d–g) High-resolution XPS spectra for rGO/CoFe2O4 composite material: (d) Co 2p, (e) Fe 2p, (f) C 1s, and (g) O 1s.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g002
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g003 550
Figure 3. (a–d) Representative SEM images and (e–h) TEM images of (a,e) Co2O3, (b,f) rGO/Co3O4, (c,g) CoFe2O4, and (d,h) rGO/CoFe2O4. SEM shows flake-like morphology for Co3O4 and CoFe2O4, and incorporation of rGO and metal flakes in the composites, confirmed by TEM.
Figure 3. (a–d) Representative SEM images and (e–h) TEM images of (a,e) Co2O3, (b,f) rGO/Co3O4, (c,g) CoFe2O4, and (d,h) rGO/CoFe2O4. SEM shows flake-like morphology for Co3O4 and CoFe2O4, and incorporation of rGO and metal flakes in the composites, confirmed by TEM.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g003
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g004 550
Figure 4. (a–b) UV–vis spectra of (a) Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4 and (b) CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4. The shift in spectra suggest rGO interacts chemically with the metal flakes in the composite. (c–d) Photocurrent density obtained using chronoamperometry for (c) Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4, and (d) CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4.
Figure 4. (a–b) UV–vis spectra of (a) Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4 and (b) CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4. The shift in spectra suggest rGO interacts chemically with the metal flakes in the composite. (c–d) Photocurrent density obtained using chronoamperometry for (c) Co3O4 and rGO/Co3O4, and (d) CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g004
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g005 550
Figure 5. Raman spectra of (a) Co3O4, (b) rGO/Co3O4, (c) CoFe2O4, and (d) rGO/CoFe2O4.
Figure 5. Raman spectra of (a) Co3O4, (b) rGO/Co3O4, (c) CoFe2O4, and (d) rGO/CoFe2O4.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g005
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g006 550
Figure 6. Growth mechanism of rGO/CoFe2O4 composite is enabled by the presence of urea, which decomposes upon mild heating to produce CO2 bubbles that act as templates for metal oxide assembly on the surfaces of rGO sheets.
Figure 6. Growth mechanism of rGO/CoFe2O4 composite is enabled by the presence of urea, which decomposes upon mild heating to produce CO2 bubbles that act as templates for metal oxide assembly on the surfaces of rGO sheets.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g006
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g007 550
Figure 7. (a,c) CV curves for CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at different scan rates, and (b,d) CP curves for CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at different current density.
Figure 7. (a,c) CV curves for CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at different scan rates, and (b,d) CP curves for CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at different current density.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g007
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g008 550
Figure 8. Specific capacitance of Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4. Inset shows the cyclic stability of the rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at 2 A/g.
Figure 8. Specific capacitance of Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4. Inset shows the cyclic stability of the rGO/Co3O4 and rGO/CoFe2O4 at 2 A/g.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g008
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g009 550
Figure 9. Effect of MG dye solution pH on linear kinetic curves in the presence of (a) Co3O4, (b) rGO/Co3O4, (c) CoFe2O4, and (d) rGO/CoFe2O4 catalysts.
Figure 9. Effect of MG dye solution pH on linear kinetic curves in the presence of (a) Co3O4, (b) rGO/Co3O4, (c) CoFe2O4, and (d) rGO/CoFe2O4 catalysts.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g009
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g010 550
Figure 10. Electron transfer mechanism in rGO/CoFe2O4 catalyst during the photodegradation of MG dye.
Figure 10. Electron transfer mechanism in rGO/CoFe2O4 catalyst during the photodegradation of MG dye.
Nanomaterials 12 03822 g010
Table
Table 1. Physical parameters of Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4 samples calculated from XRD data.
Table 1. Physical parameters of Co3O4, CoFe2O4, rGO/Co3O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4 samples calculated from XRD data.
Sample TypeLattice Parameter
Å		Scherrer Crystallite Size D, nmWH Crystallite Size D, nmStrain ε, %
Co3O48.011.58544.7 ± 0.0093
rGO/Co3O48.071.11511.6 ± 0.0022
CoFe2O45.831.6019.2 ± 0.0020
rGO/CoFe2O45.851.3158.7 ± 0.0020.4
Table
Table 2. Malachite Green dye visible light photodegradation efficiency and rate constant values for Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4.
Table 2. Malachite Green dye visible light photodegradation efficiency and rate constant values for Co3O4, rGO/Co3O4, CoFe2O4, and rGO/CoFe2O4.
CatalystsRate Constant (k), min−1Degradation Efficiency, %
Co3O40.0043666.2
rGO/Co3O40.0059268.1
CoFe2O40.0051372.7
rGO/CoFe2O40.0066780.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramasamy, T.; Satheesh, L.G.; Selvaraj, V.; Bazaka, O.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K.; Mandhakini, M. Spinel CoFe2O4 Nanoflakes: A Path to Enhance Energy Generation and Environmental Remediation Potential of Waste-Derived rGO. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3822. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213822

AMA Style

Ramasamy T, Satheesh LG, Selvaraj V, Bazaka O, Levchenko I, Bazaka K, Mandhakini M. Spinel CoFe2O4 Nanoflakes: A Path to Enhance Energy Generation and Environmental Remediation Potential of Waste-Derived rGO. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(21):3822. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramasamy, Tamilselvi, Lekshmi Gopakumari Satheesh, Vaithilingam Selvaraj, Olha Bazaka, Igor Levchenko, Kateryna Bazaka, and Mohandas Mandhakini. 2022. "Spinel CoFe2O4 Nanoflakes: A Path to Enhance Energy Generation and Environmental Remediation Potential of Waste-Derived rGO" Nanomaterials 12, no. 21: 3822. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop