Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Bioimaging of Nitrogen-Vacancy Nanodiamonds
Next Article in Special Issue
Variable-Barrier Quantum Coulomb Blockade Effect in Nanoscale Transistors
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Characterisation of a Whole Hybrid Sol-Gel Optofluidic Platform for Biosensing Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Directional Cloak Design by All-Dielectric Unit-Cell Optimized Structure

1
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
2
Aselsan Inc., Ankara 06200, Turkey
3
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
4
Nondestructive School, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
5
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek 720038, Kyrgyzstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(23), 4194; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234194
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Materials with Target Functionalities)

Abstract

:
In this manuscript, we demonstrate the design and experimental proof of an optical cloaking structure that multi-directionally conceals a perfectly electric conductor (PEC) object from an incident plane wave. The dielectric modulation around the highly reflective scattering PEC object is determined by an optimization process for multi-directional cloaking purposes. Additionally, to obtain the multi-directional effect of the cloaking structure, an optimized slice is mirror symmetrized through a radial perimeter. The three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain method is integrated with genetic optimization to achieve a cloaking design. In order to overcome the technological problems of the corresponding devices in the optical range and to experimentally demonstrate the proposed concept, our experiments were carried out on a scale model in the microwave range. The scaled proof-of-concept of the proposed structure is fabricated by 3D printing of polylactide material, and the brass metallic alloy is used as a perfect electrical conductor for microwave experiments. A good agreement between numerical and experimental results is achieved. The proposed design approach is not restricted only to multi-directional optical cloaking but can also be applied to different cloaking scenarios dealing with electromagnetic waves at nanoscales as well as other types such as acoustic waves. Using nanotechnology, our scale proof-of-concept research will take the next step toward the creation of “optical cloaking” devices.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

One of the most intriguing and mysterious phenomena that has captured researchers’ imaginations for centuries is invisibility. In general, invisibility means that a light wave incident on an object should retain its optical property after passing through an object. In other words, the scattered and deteriorated field resulting from the object should be reconstructed and corrected to replicate the incident wave. The first realistic idea of an invisibility cloak has been introduced to the literature by the pioneering works of Leonhardt and Pendry [1,2]. Here, the application of the conformal mapping concept is proposed, and the first application of transformation optics (TO) into optical cloaking is demonstrated [3,4,5,6]. In TO, the incident wave is guided to follow a curved trajectory by simply bending the coordinate system to obtain the cloaking of objects.
Along with TO, an interesting approach for concealing an object named “carpet-cloaking” is proposed. Here, a large scatterer object is hidden under a reflective layer named carpet by using quasi-conformal mapping [7,8,9,10,11]. Similarly, as in TO, this non-Euclidian approach provides an interesting solution to prevent an object from detection [12]. This approach has been further developed to design and analyze carpet cloaking methods [13,14,15]. Lately, different from the TO concept, new design strategies for optical cloaking are proposed such as metasurfaces [16,17], zero-refractive-index materials [18], plasmonics [19,20,21], thermally tunable semiconductors [22], transmission-lines made by parallel-plate waveguides [23], uniform dielectric claddings [24], woodpile photonic structures [25], graded index structures [26], and superluminal media [27] to operate in different wavelength regimes including microwave, terahertz, infrared and visible. Moreover, due to its perfect directional projection property [28,29] and transformation-invariant feature [30,31], optical cloaking can be realized by the so-called optic-null medium. Here, an optical-null medium can be used as a cloaking shell for the scatterer since it is a high anisotropic homogenous medium without any negative component. Moreover, the mantle cloaking technique offers scattering cancellation by covering the cylindrical dielectric with a conducting helical sheet [32] or concentric mantle cloak [33] by satisfying surface impedance conditions at designed frequencies. In addition, mantle-cloaking mechanisms have the advantages of reducing the overall size of the scatterer-cloak system [34]. These techniques are based on using ultrathin conductive metasurfaces composed of subwavelength periodic elements to cancel the different scattering multi-poles by producing an anti-phase scattered wave that suppresses most of the scattered fields [34,35,36].
Moreover, to obtain an optical cloaking effect, the suppression of scatterings resulting from an object is realized by using generalized Hilbert transforms [37] and Kramers–Kronig relations [38]. In addition to these studies, the focusing effect is also used for creating invisible regions both in ray and wave optics [39,40]. Finally, the idea of using optimization algorithms for the generation/reshaping of the cloaking region shows promising results [41,42,43,44]. In this direction, inverse design and topology optimization approaches were used for the design of cloaking devices applied to electromagnetic, acoustic, and water waves [45,46,47,48,49]. Here, the optimization methods search for possible designs of cloaking structures in accordance with a specific objective function. Furthermore, experimental verifications of microwave frequency regimes of cloaking designs based on optimization methods were reported in Refs. [50,51].
The nanotechnology plays a significant role in the development and creation of new cloaking devices on the nanoscale [52]. Moreover, optical cloaking plays an important role in an industry where the development of nanotechnology makes possible the design of novel camouflage systems and radar-absorbing surfaces for low-observable technologies [53,54,55,56]. In accordance with the state-of-the-art nanofabrication technology, controlling the flow of light along with their spatial mapping at the nanoscale in some cases is always not possible. On the other hand, thanks to the scalability of Maxwell’s equations [57,58], one can always analyze the designed prototype in the microwave region for verification of the proof of the proposed concept [59,60,61].
In this study, we propose the design of an all-dielectric, lossless, broadband, and passive multi-directional cloaking structure that conceals a highly reflective perfectly electric conductor (PEC) material/object from an incident plane wave. The designed cloak is composed of polylactide (PLA) material, which is a low-loss biodegradable thermoplastic polymer with a low permittivity value. This dielectric material is widely used in three-dimensional (3D) additive printing technology and gives the opportunity for direct and cost-effective fabrication of the devices. The generalized framework of the proposed design approach, with numerical and experimental analysis of the performance of the designed cloaking structure, is provided in the current study. In addition, experimental verification of numerical results is performed at a microwave frequency regime of around 10 GHz to demonstrate the operating principle of the design. As was noted above, the scale model of the proposed cloaking structure allows for realizing a “rapid low-cost prototyping” for verification of proof-of-concept in the microwave regime. Moreover, the physical mechanism of the directional concealing effect of the designed optical cloak is primarily associated with the imperfect conformal mapping and partial suppression of scattered fields from the object. Since complete cloaking is impossible with conformal mapping with realistic material parameters, the remaining scattering is eliminated by an intelligent rendering of the cloaking structure thanks to advanced optimization.
Compared to the conventional cloaking approaches, in the presented study the spatial tailoring of the domain is realized by an intelligent distribution of binary components (aka unit cells). By using this approach, we designed a cloaking structure with “similarities” to the ideal performance of transformation optics cloaks. The advantage and novelty of the proposed scheme are that, as opposed to transformation optics that require the use of non-practical or non-physical materials, the presented approach is all-dielectric and essentially uses only two materials that are intelligently arranged by the GA. We believe that the proposed study will contribute a different point of view to the cloaking phenomenon with its unconventional design approach, interesting physical mechanism, and experimental verification. In addition, the proposed design methodology can find various cloaking applications of electromagnetic waves and may enable the multi-directional concealment of different objects possessing various sizes and shapes.

2. Design Steps and Numerical Results

To optically hide an object or make it invisible, the incident wave should be reconstructed without distortion after passing through an object. In other words, the scattered field resulting from the object should be corrected/transformed to replicate the incident wave. For this reason, one should design such an environment around an object that enables the suppression of scatterings and the diminishing of back-reflections. Hence, in contrast to forward design approaches the problem of optical cloaking can be treated as an inverse problem. Here, the desired optical properties of the output electromagnetic field are defined and integrated into the cost function of the optimization method, and the algorithm iteratively searches for the best structure (environment) that provides the desired output. Therefore, to obtain the desired optical cloaking effect, we optimally modulated the cloaking region’s effective index distribution.
In this study, to achieve an optical cloaking effect, the concept of covering highly scattering material by index-modulated structure is considered. For this reason, the circular shape is selected for the covering structure, which is also beneficial for multi-directional optical concealing in both x- and y-propagation directions. Figure 1a illustrates the schematic representation of the design approach. As can be seen in Figure 1a, the circular region is divided into 8 slices with 45° internal angles to increase the directional independency. Here, to obtain the bi-directional effect of the cloaking structure, the optimized slice is mirror symmetrized through the radial perimeter (the letter “K” shows the symmetry effect). In other words, by this symmetry concept, the proposed structure demonstrates the exact same optical light conveying behavior in both injection x- and y-directions. The dashed and solid lines superimposed on the schematics in Figure 1a define the border lines of mirror symmetry and rotational symmetry, respectively. In other words, the designed structure has 8 mirror symmetry slices, which provide 4-fold rotational symmetry with 90° rotation angles. Here, rotational symmetry border lines define the injection directions of the cloak, which are defined by blue arrows in Figure 1a. It should be noted that it is also possible to increase the number of injection directions (for multi-directional cloaking) by properly increasing the number of symmetry slices. Symmetry slices are considered to be composed of rectangular-shaped unit cells. The unit cells can be in two different states, such as PLA ( ε P L A —the existence of the unit cell) or air ( ε a i r —the absence of the unit cell), according to the decision of the applied optimization.
It is important to note that to define the states of those unit cells, the genetic algorithm (GA) is integrated with the 3D finite difference time domain (FDTD) method [62]. GA is used for the optimal distribution of permittivity that reduces the observability of the object. GA is an evolutionary algorithm, i.e., a meta-heuristic, that mainly adapts advantage of the survival of the fittest in the evolutionary process. As the biological counterparts of evolution theory, GA comprises mechanisms such as crossover, mutation, and selection. GA iteratively searches the solution space to find candidate solutions to the problem described as a cost function. Here, GA decides whether each unit cell inside the optimization region is filled with PLA material or not. The algorithm fills the unit cell with air if it generates the binary number “0”. Otherwise, for “1” it fills the unit cell with PLA. The three-dimensional view of the optimized cloaking structure with materials’ parameters is demonstrated in Figure 1b. All unit cells filled with PLA are structurally identical, and each one emerges as a rectangular prism that has dimensions of 0.1 λ × 0.1 λ × 1.5 λ, as shown as an inset in Figure 1b. Throughout the study, the dielectric constants of PLA material and air are fixed to ε P L A = 2.4 [63], and ε a i r = 1.0 , respectively. In place of the highly scattered object, which is intended to be hidden from the incident wave, the cylindrical-shaped perfect electrical conductor (PEC) is considered. The cylindrical PEC has a diameter of 1.15 λ and a height of 1.5 λ. Additionally, the diameter of the final structure is measured as 5.6 λ. Considering the dimension of the structure, we can say that the designed structure belongs to the class of mesotronics [64].
The main goal of the study is to design such a surrounding structure that reduces the scattering effect of both itself and the PEC located inside the cloaked region. For this reason, before starting the optimization, it is instructive to inspect the incident light scattering effect of bare PEC without cloaking, PEC coated with a fully filled/solid structure, and PEC coated with a randomly PLA-filled structure.
For numerical analysis of light–matter interaction, the 3D FDTD is employed, and as an incident light source transverse electrical (TE) polarized plane wave is considered. It should be noted that, for TE polarization, the electric field components are along the xy-plane (Ex, Ey) and the magnetic field (Hz) is perpendicular to the xy-plane. In our simulations, perfectly matched layers construct the boundaries of the simulation area to serve as an absorbing boundary condition [65,66]. The corresponding results are gathered in Figure 2. The calculated magnetic field distributions as well as phase distributions for all structures are given in Figure 2a,b (structure types of the corresponding fields are labeled on a vertical axis), respectively. Moreover, cross-sectional field and phase profiles are extracted before (“input”) and after (“output”) structure in the propagation x-direction at a distance of 6.2 λ from the center of the cloak (which corresponds to the radiative near-field region if we consider cloak center as a wave source) [51]. The corresponding input and output cross-sectional profiles indicate the level of distortions in the wave fronts of the propagated light, as seen in Figure 2c. As can be seen from the figure plots, while the bare PEC is a small object compared to the size of its coating structure, it strongly scatters the incident wave. The variations in the output cross-sectional profile are higher than the input side due to the scantiness of back reflections, as seen in Figure 2c. On the other hand, without any optimization process, when the cloaked object is coated with solid PLA material, it is obvious that the scattering effect of bare PEC worsens due to expanding light–matter interactions into the reckless distribution of the covering dielectric material. Moreover, in the case of a randomly distributed cloaking structure, one can see that chaotically superimposed higher-order modes are enhancing back reflections by distorting phase profiles at the input and output locations of the structure. All these undesired effects motivate us to use optimized index modulation of the PEC covering material to design a cloaking structure with negligible scattering characteristics. It is important to note that the calculated transmission efficiencies for only PEC, bare structure with PEC, and randomly generated structure with PEC are 92%, 70%, and 51% at the frequency of 10 GHz, respectively.
The GA is employed to optimize the cloaking region by reducing the scattering of the transmitted and reflected fields. It minimizes the cost function given as follows:
f c o s t = H e r r o r + φ e r r o r T
In Equation (1), H e r r o r and φ e r r o r stand for the total wave front distortions of magnetic field and phase field distributions at the input and output planes, respectively. Here, we tried to conserve the linearity of the input and output crosses by minimizing the differences between the cross-sectional field and phase profiles and their average values. These differences were defined as distortion errors for both magnetic field distributions and phase profiles. The error for magnetic field profile is formulated as follows:
H e r r o r = y ( | H z ( x i n , y ) H z ¯ ( x i n , y ) | + | H z ( x o u t , y ) H z ¯ ( x o u t , y ) | )
where, H z is the magnetic field and H z ¯   represents the mean value of the magnetic field at the cross-section location of x i n and x o u t , which denote the input and output profiles’ positions, respectively. Moreover, y stands for the order of the mesh cells along the y-axis in the simulation area. The same concept is also used for the error calculation of phase profiles as follows:
φ e r r o r = y ( | φ z ( x i n , y ) φ z ¯ ( x i n , y ) | + | φ z ( x o u t , y ) φ z ¯ ( x o u t , y ) | )
where, φ z represents the cross-sectional phase profile and φ z ¯ represents the mean value of the phase front at the predefined locations. In addition, in Equation (1), the T represents the transmission efficiency percentage, which measures the total optical power of the incident wave that is transmitted through the structures. Besides the correction of distorted fields, the maximization of transmission efficiency is also important because proper optical cloaking is only reasonable with high transmission efficiency. Here, high transmissivity has an important impact on the transparency characteristic of the cloak, which minimizes its shadowing effect.
The magnetic and phase field distributions and their cross-sectional profiles for the optimized bi-directional cloak are proposed in Figure 3a,b, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 3a,c, the optimized cloaking structure that covers the PEC object suppresses the field distortions/variations and successfully reproduces the incident plane wave at the back plane, as well as diminishing undesirable back reflections. From the wave propagation characteristic through the cloaking region, we can observe that the cloaking structure is designed in such a way that undesired reflections from the PEC are reduced into negligibly small values and correct the distorted field at the output plane. In other words, the cloaking region operates as a transparent/anti-reflective coating effect that transmits the light through the PEC object without affecting its initial state. Furthermore, one can observe that the propagating field is enhanced by the guiding and confining inside of the cloak, which results in phase-matching behavior by effectively reducing the scattering field and restoring the wave fronts before and after the structure. As a result, substantial scattering cancellations are achieved with the optimal structure compared to the structures presented in Figure 2. Moreover, enhancement of the transmittance characteristic of the optimized cloaking structure is achieved, which reveals a transmission efficiency of 84% at the design frequency of 10 GHz.
As it was noted, the designed structure has four-fold rotational symmetry, as seen in Figure 1. Here the rotational and mirror symmetry concepts are realized to provide quasi-omnidirectional invisibility behavior for the structure [26,41,43]. In this regard, the proposed structure is optimized considering these symmetry constraints, and the corresponding results are given in Figure 3c,d. As a result, one can observe the same bi-directional cloaking effect in the transverse y-direction with negligible field and phase profile distortions. Moreover, in both x- and y-incident directions, the field and phase profiles are almost identical to each other, which justifies its bi-directional operation.
It is necessary to properly suppress the scattered field of the superimposed multiple modes to achieve an invisibility cloak [67,68,69]. As can be observed from the results given in Figure 3a,d, the optimized cloaking structure suppresses higher-order modes that enhance the scattering effect by reducing the observability of the PEC at the operating frequency of 10 GHz. In this regard, it is informative to show a scattering effect analysis of the optimized structure.
In fact, the proposed cloaking structure presents scattering-reducing effects in orthogonal (horizontal) and (vertical) directions, as can be observed from the results in Figure 3. It means that the optimization constraints and cost functions given in Equations (1)–(3) are indirectly reduced backward, and forward scattering effects of the PEC coated by the cloaking structure. To analyze cloaking performance quantitively, the proposed design is evaluated by calculating the scattering fields of PEC with/without the proposed cloak and a randomly generated structure. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 4. The scattering effects of bare PEC, PEC coated with randomly generated and optimized cloak structures are gathered in Figure 4. Here, Figure 4a demonstrates the scattered field of the PEC. As expected, the perfect conductor generates strong back-reflections and a shadow region in the forward direction, which can also be inferred from Figure 2a. The effect of randomly distributed dielectric material (unit-cell) on incident light scattering is presented in Figure 4b. Here, due to its randomness and inattentive distribution, we can observe a strong diffraction effect, which leads to an undesired distortion of the incident wave. On the other hand, the strong scattering effect of a PEC is significantly reduced when it is coated by an optimized cloak structure, as seen in Figure 4c. The reduction occurs in both the backward and forward scattering directions. The negligible appearance of the scattering field is covered by a wise arrangement of the spectral distribution of the dielectric material, which qualitatively demonstrates its invisibility performance.
As stated previously, the transmissivity of the cloak is also crucial for it to operate efficiently. High transmittance of undistorted wave behavior is achieved during the optimization process because the cost function of the optimization is targeted to maximize transmission efficiency while reducing the distortions. Moreover, we should remind that the proposed structure is designed and optimized at a fixed design frequency of 10 GHz. The design and analysis of the cloaking for multifrequency operation purposes was however outside the scope of the manuscript. A possible follow-up study could in principle employ our design approach using a frequency-dependent target function to provide the possibility of the object concealing effect in different frequency regimes.
Although the main purpose of the study was the demonstration of the novel approach of multidirectional cloaking at a fixed frequency, it would be interesting to investigate the frequency response of the proposed structure in the vicinity of the design frequency. This post-optimization analysis may give important insight into the multifrequency operation mechanisms of the cloaking structure. In addition, analyzing the variation of the defined cost function and the performance characteristics of the structure, such as scattering and transmission over operating frequencies of 8.8 GHz and 11.6 GHz can be instructive and beneficial to understanding the underlying mechanism of cloaking. For this reason, we prepared Figure 5, where the trade-off between the cost function, scattering, and transmission are analyzed. Here, the cost values ( f c o s t ) for the designed structure at different operating frequencies between 8.8 GHz and 11.6 GHz, are calculated according to Equation (1). Moreover, spatially averaged scattered fields [70] are calculated by averaging the fields for the same operating frequency regime according to the following equation:
H s c a t ¯ ( f ) = y x ( | H z , i n ( x , y , f ) H z , f r e e ( x , y , f ) | + | H z , o u t ( x , y , f ) H z , f r e e ( x , y , f ) | ) S
where, f represents interested frequency points in the given band, S shows the total area of interest where the scattering field is calculated, H z , i n ( x , y , f ) and H z , o u t ( x , y , f ) indicate the values of a magnetic field at x, y locations before and after the cloak structure, respectively. Moreover, magnetic field values of the free space are denoted by H z , f r e e ( x , y , f ) . In Figure 5a, we present the calculated cost and averaged scattering field values. Although the averaged scattered field was not an input parameter for the cost function, its values in the monitored frequency region demonstrate a similar trend. As expected, at the design frequency of 10 GHz, the averaged scattered field takes the minimum value as the cost function. In Figure 5b, we superimposed cost values versus the transmission efficiency of the structure for the interested frequency band region. Here, the relation of the transmission efficiency and the cost values shows logical dependency since increasing the transmission results in a decrease in the cost value, as expected according to Equation (1). Of course, both graphs do not present perfect harmony due to the different factors such as field and phase distortion that also affect the overall performance of the optimized structure. At this stage, it makes sense to make a detailed frequency response analysis of the proposed structure by considering specially selected frequency points. Here, we select 8 different frequency points (defined as c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j), which correspond to the local extremum values of the cost function, as can be seen in Figure 5a,b. The corresponding frequency values of selected points are given as an inset in Figure 5c,j. Semitransparent lines from c to j and green circle markers are defined in Figure 5a,b to show values of the averaged scattering field and transmission efficiencies that correspond to those extremum values of the cost function. The magnetic field distributions at those 8 frequency points are presented in Figure 5c–j. As can be seen from Figure 5c, the proposed structure shows strong distortion in the back and forward fields for the operating frequency of 8.7 GHz. While approaching the design frequency of 10 GHz, we see sequential improvements in the suppression of backward and forward scatterings, resulting in reduced distortion of wavefronts, as demonstrated in Figure 5d–f. At the same time, the correction of distortions and increase in transmission efficiency cause a decrease in the cost function. At the design frequency, the cost function and average scattering field values are reaching their minimum value, while transmission efficiency is reached 84%. On the other hand, increasing the frequency makes back-reflections apparent by causing strong distortions of the field, as can be seen from Figure 5g–j. Moreover, due to strong light–matter interaction at the high frequencies cloaking structure demonstrates a strong forward shadowing effect by losing its phase-matching ability, which is explicitly seen from field distributions in Figure 5i,j. Although we expect an inverse relationship between transmission and cost function, transmission efficiency shows increasing persistence until the frequency point of 10.52 GHz, despite increasing cost function. This effect is caused by the defined cost function parameters, where correction of field and phase distortion is dominated over the transmission effect during the optimization while balancing the trade-off between them. Even though the proposed structure is optimized at a fixed frequency, the results gathered in Figure 5 show that the optical cloaking is achievable with acceptable performance between frequencies of 9.5 GHz and 10.5 GHz. Due to the absence of a resonance effect in the proposed approach, the multi-dimensional cloaking successfully operates over a certain bandwidth interval.

3. Experimental Verification in Microwave Regime

Experimental verification of the cloaking performance of the proposed structure is realized in the microwave frequency regime. The optimized cloak is fabricated by a 3D printing technique that utilizes (polylactic acid) PLA material, which is a widely used plastic filament material for rapid manufacturing. The PLA material provides a permittivity value of PLA ε P L A = 2.4 at microwave frequencies between 8 GHz and 12 GHz, according to the Nicolson–Ross and Weir measurement method [63]. In place of the PEC object that is intended to be cloaked, a cylindrical object made of brass material with a diameter of 34.6 mm and a height of 45 mm is used in the experiment. Brass is a compound of copper and zinc materials that has scattering properties at microwave frequencies between 8 GHz and 12 GHz. Throughout the experimental process, the Agilent E5071C ENA vector network analyzer is used to generate and measure electromagnetic waves. The generated microwaves at an operating frequency of 10 GHz were directed towards the cloaking structure by the horn antenna in front of the structure, as seen from the experimental setup with an artistic illustration of a propagating wave behind the cloak in Figure 6a. Moreover, the monopole antenna is connected to the same network analyzer and located on a motorized stage to measure the magnetic field distribution behind the designed cloaking structure. It should be noted that an aperture antenna is placed at a distance to provide a planar wavefront of the incident wave at the front surface of the cloaking structure because the horn antenna generates a Gaussian-profiled wave with spherical wavefronts. The photographic illustration of a brass cylindrical object coated by a fabricated cloaking structure is shown as an inset in Figure 6a. To evaluate the cloaking performance of the structure qualitatively and quantitatively, three different experimental cases are considered. Firstly, free space propagation of the incident wave is measured in a defined area of measurement (scanning area) located behind the position of the cloak. The corresponding magnetic field distribution of the free space propagation at a design 10 GHz frequency is presented in Figure 6b. Later, we positioned the brass object only and measured the magnetic field. Finally, we placed the designed cloak to surround the brass object and realized the same measurements in the same scanning area at the frequency of 10 GHz. The corresponding magnetic fields are presented in Figure 6c,d, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 6c, a cylindrical brass object strongly scatters the incident wave, and the resulting wavefront behind the structure is divided into two branches (the appearance of the shadow is explicitly visible). On the other hand, the cloaking structure pulls the scattered fields together by conveying them around the brass object to reproduce a wave resembling the plane wave. In addition to the field and phase profile results, the transmission efficiency of the cloaking structure was measured at 76% at 10 GHz, and that result is very close to the numerical value. In Figure 6e,f, the cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the output are plotted for the cases of free space, PEC only, and PEC coated by the cloak, respectively. Here, one can see that cylindrical brass strongly scatters the incident plane wave and leads to strong variations in both the magnetic field and phase distributions. On the other hand, the proposed cloaking structure minimizes/suppresses the field variations and successfully recovers the incident plane wave behind the structure. To present the scattering suppressing performance of the cloak, the average scattered field is calculated by Equation (4) using the data from the experiments. Measured and numerically calculated average scattering field variations with respect to the microwave frequencies are superimposed in Figure 6g. Here, we can see that the minimum scattering value appeared at around 10 GHz, which is parallel to the numerical results. From the experimental results, it can be concluded that optimized cloaking structures exhibit an invisibility effect for highly scattering objects by recovering the distorted field at the observation area.

4. Further Discussion: The Concept of Multi-Directional Cloaking

Previously in this study, we introduced the design and optimization of a bi-directional cloaking structure by using rectangular-shaped unit cells. Generally, the numerical design and manufacturing of rectangular-shaped unit cells with defined structural parameters are comparably simple and cost-effective [43]. It is crucial to note that rectangular-shaped unit cells are suitable only for one- and two-directional cloaking structure designs because of the perfect radial alignment between mirror-symmetrized slices. However, the number of cloaking directions greater than two (internal angle of the mirror symmetrized slices smaller than 45°) is not physically/geometrically achievable with rectangular shaped unit cells. For this reason, to realize multi-directional cloaking, we further propose exploiting of unit cells having the shape of annular sectors instead of rectangular ones. The schematic representation of the optimized 3-directional cloaking structure composed of annular sectors is presented in Figure 7a. Here, the number of mirror-symmetrized slices is increased to 12 according to the number of injection directions. The incident wave injection angles are defined as 0°, 60°, and 120° degrees, as can be seen in Figure 7a. The overall size of the cloaking structure is kept the same as the bi-directional cloaking structure proposed in Figure 1a. A circle is divided into 12 slices, and one of the slices is introduced to the algorithm to define the existence of unit cells that construct the slice. After determining the existence of unit cells thanks to GA integrated with FDTD in the slice, again the mirror symmetry approach was used for the optimized slice as a design approach. Then, it is rotated to construct the optimal circular cloaking structure. To construct the optimized slice, we determine the radius of the circle (amount of circle) based on the construction constraints (3D printer) and the degree of the slice to construct the intended angle. The degree of each unit cell is arranged such that when one ends, the other starts, and the difference of both radii is determined to correspond to 0.1 λ.
As can be seen from Figure 7b, the optimized cloaking structure that covers the PEC object suppresses the field and phase distortions/variations and successfully reproduces the incident plane wave at the back plane, as well as by diminishing undesirable back reflections. From the wave propagation characteristic through the cloaking region, we can observe that the cloaking structure is designed in such a way that undesired reflections from the PEC are reduced into negligibly small values and corrects the distorted field at the output plane. In other words, the cloaking region operates as a transparent/anti-reflective coating effect that transmits the light through the PEC object without affecting its initial state. Furthermore, one can observe that the propagating field is enhanced by the guiding and confining inside of the cloak, which results in phase-matching behavior by effectively reducing the scattering field and restoring the wave fronts before and after the structure. From Figure 7c, it can be said that strong scattering cancellations are achieved with the optimal structure for three different directions of the incident. It is crucial to note that the designed 3-directional cloaking structure exhibits a high transmission efficiency of 83% at the design frequency of 10 GHz. It should be noted that by appropriately the dimensions of the design and selecting the appropriate material, the same approach can be applied to different nanomaterials. The structure can be realized via different manufacturing techniques, such as e-beam lithography or direct laser writing.

5. Conclusions

In the presented study, we show the design and experimental proof of an optical cloaking structure for multi-directional hiding of a perfectly electric conductor (PEC) object from an incident light wave operating at the design frequency, which is 10 GHz. The structure has a circular shape, which is discretized into square elementary cells that can be either non-magnetic/all-dielectric polylactide (PLA) material or air, which is meta-heuristically determined by the Darwinian concept of the natural selection method. In other words, the dielectric modulation around the highly reflective scattering PEC object is determined by an optimization process for multi-directional cloaking purposes. Moreover, to obtain the multi-directional effect of the cloaking structure, an optimized slice is mirror symmetrized through a radial perimeter. The three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain method is integrated with genetic optimization to achieve cloaking design. The main objective of the designed cloaking structure is to suppress the reflected light and reproduce the transmitted light into the plane wave by reducing the amplitude fluctuations in the cross-sectional field and phase profiles. In addition, the optical power transmission characteristic of the directional cloaking structure is considered during the concealing of PEC objects by the cloaking structure. To quantify the cloaking effect, spatially averaged scattered fields are also calculated. The proposed structure is fabricated by 3D printing of PLA material, and the brass metallic alloy is used as a perfect electrical conductor for microwave experiments. A good agreement between numerical and experimental results is achieved. Using nanotechnology, our scale proof-of-concept research will take the next step toward the creation of “optical cloaking” devices in the nanoscale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.; methodology, M.T.; software, M.A. and M.T.; Experimental design and validation, M.A. and M.T.; formal analysis, M.A. and M.T.; investigation, M.T., M.A., H.K., I.V.M. and O.V.M.; resources, H.K., I.V.M. and O.V.M.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A. and M.T.; writing—review and editing, M.T., M.A., H.K., I.V.M. and O.V.M.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the research is included in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

I.V.M. and O.V.M. acknowledge the support from TPU development program. M.T. and M.A. would like to thank Bumin Kagan Yildirim for his technical support on microwave experiments and help on preparing visualization plots of the extracted data.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest exists for this study.

References

  1. Leonhardt, U. Optical Conformal Mapping. Science 2006, 312, 1777–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pendry, J.B.; Schurig, D.; Smith, D.R. Controlling Electromagnetic Fields. Science 2006, 312, 1780–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, H.; Chan, C.T.; Sheng, P. Transformation Optics and Metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Y.; Zentgraf, T.; Bartal, G.; Zhang, X. Transformational Plasmon Optics. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1991–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ozgun, O.; Kuzuoglu, M. Form Invariance of Maxwell’s Equations: The Pathway to Novel Metamaterial Specifications for Electromagnetic Reshaping. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2010, 52, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schurig, D.; Pendry, J.B.; Smith, D.R. Calculation of Material Properties and Ray Tracing in Transformation Media. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 9794–9804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valentine, J.; Li, J.; Zentgraf, T.; Bartal, G.; Zhang, X. An Optical Cloak Made of Dielectrics. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, J.; Pendry, J.B. Hiding under the Carpet: A New Strategy for Cloaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 3901–3904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Leonhardt, U.; Tyc, T. Broadband Invisibility by Non-Euclidean Cloaking. Science 2009, 323, 110–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, R.; Ji, C.; Mock, J.J.; Chin, J.Y.; Cui, T.J.; Smith, D.R. Broadband Ground-Plane Cloak. Science 2009, 323, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dupont, G.; Guenneau, S.; Enoch, S. Electromagnetic Analysis of Arbitrarily Shaped Pinched Carpets. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82, 033840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kallos, E.; Argyropoulos, C.; Hao, Y. Ground-Plane Quasicloaking for Free Space. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 063825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Halimeh, J.C.; Ergin, T.; Mueller, J.; Stenger, N.; Wegener, M. Photorealistic Images of Carpet Cloaks. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 19328–19336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Danner, A.J. Visualizing Invisibility: Metamaterials-Based Optical Devices in Natural Environments. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 3332–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Halimeh, J.C.; Wegener, M. Photorealistic Rendering of Unidirectional Free-Space Invisibility Cloaks. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 9457–9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Orazbayev, B.; Estakhri, N.; Beruete, M.; Alu, A. Terahertz Carpet Cloak Based on a Ring Resonator Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 195444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chu, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, B.; Luo, J.; Sun, S.; Hang, Z.H.; Zhou, L.; Lai, Y. A Hybrid Invisibility Cloak Based on Integration of Transparent Metasurfaces and Zero-Index Materials. Light Sci. Appl. 2018, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bor, E.; Gorkem Yasa, U.; Kurt, H.; Turduev, M. Demonstration of Carpet Cloaking by an Anisotropic Zero Refractive Index Medium. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 2423–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guild, M.D.; Haberman, M.R.; Alù, A. Plasmonic Cloaking and Scattering Cancelation for Electromagnetic and Acoustic Waves. Wave Motion 2011, 48, 468–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rainwater, D.; Kerkhoff, A.; Melin, K.; Soric, J.C.; Moreno, G.; Alù, A. Experimental Verification of Three-Dimensional Plasmonic Cloaking in Free-Space. N. J. Phys. 2012, 14, 013054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Edwards, B.; Alù, A.; Silveirinha, M.G.; Engheta, N. Experimental Verification of Plasmonic Cloaking at Microwave Frequencies with Metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 153901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Serebryannikov, E.A.; Alici, B.K.; Ozbay, E.; Lakhtakia, A. Thermally sensitive scattering of terahertz waves by coated cylinders for tunable invisibility and masking. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tretyakov, S.; Alitalo, P.; Luukkonen, O.; Simovski, C. Broadband Electromagnetic Cloaking of Long Cylindrical Objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 103905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Valagiannopoulos, C.A.; Alitalo, P. Electromagnetic cloaking of cylindrical objects by multilayer or uniform dielectric claddings. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 115402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ergin, T.; Stenger, N.; Brenner, P.; Pendry, J.B.; Wegener, M. Three-Dimensional Invisibility Cloak at Optical Wavelengths. Science 2010, 328, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Babayiğit, C.; Evren, A.S.; Bor, E.; Kurt, H.; Turduev, M. Analytical, Numerical, and Experimental Investigation of a Luneburg Lens System for Directional Cloaking. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 043831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Semouchkina, E.; Duan, R.; Gandji, N.P.; Jamilan, S.; Semouchkin, G.; Pandey, R. Superluminal Media Formed by Photonic Crystals for Transformation Optics-Based Invisibility Cloaks. J. Opt. 2016, 18, 044007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, Q.; Xiao, S.; Li, X.; Zhou, L. Optic-Null Medium: Realization and Applications. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 28948–28959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, F.; He, S. Optical Surface Transformation: Changing the Optical Surface by Homogeneous Optic-Null Medium at Will. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, F.; Guo, Z.; Wu, J.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, H. Effective Optical Nihility Media Realized by One-Dimensional Photonic Crystals Containing Hyperbolic Metamaterials. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 33198–33207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Pendry, J.; Zhang, B. Transformation-invariant metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 067701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, P.-Y.; Monticone, F.; Alu, A. Suppressing the Electromagnetic Scattering with an Helical Mantle Cloak. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 1598–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, P.-Y.; Alù, A. Mantle Cloaking Using Thin Patterned Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 205110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alù, A. Mantle cloak: Invisibility induced by a surface. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 245115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Monti, A.; Soric, J.; Barbuto, M.; Ramaccia, D.; Vellucci, S.; Trotta, F.; Alù, A.; Toscano, A.; Bilotti, F. Mantle cloaking for co-site radio-frequency antennas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 113502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Padooru, Y.R.; Yakovlev, A.B.; Chen, P.; Alù, A. Analytical modeling of conformal mantle cloaks for cylindrical objects using sub-wavelength printed and slotted arrays. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 34907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hayran, Z.; Herrero, R.; Botey, M.; Kurt, H.; Staliunas, K. Invisibility on Demand Based on a Generalized Hilbert Transform. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 013822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Horsley, S.A.R.; Artoni, M.; La Rocca, G.C. Spatial Kramers–Kronig Relations and the Reflection of Waves. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Choi, J.S.; Howell, J.C. Paraxial Ray Optics Cloaking. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 29465–29478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vasić, B.; Gajić, R. Self-Focusing Media Using Graded Photonic Crystals: Focusing, Fourier Transforming and Imaging, Directive Emission, and Directional Cloaking. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 053103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Andkjær, J.; Sigmund, O. Topology Optimized Low-Contrast All-Dielectric Optical Cloak. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 021112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Vial, B.; Hao, Y. Topology Optimized All-Dielectric Cloak: Design, Performances and Modal Picture of the Invisibility Effect. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 23551–23560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bor, E.; Babayiğit, C.; Kurt, H.; Staliunas, K.; Turduev, M. Directional Invisibility Induced by a Genetic Optimization Approach. Opt. Lett 2018, 43, 5781–5784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X.; Tian, X. Optimized Design for Illusion Device by Genetic Algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Deng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Y. Inverse Design of Dielectric Resonator Cloaking Based on Topology Optimization. Plasmonics 2017, 12, 1717–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Miguel-Torcal, A.; Abad-Arredondo, J.; García-Vidal, F.J.; Fernández-Domínguez, A.I. Inverse-Designed Dielectric Cloaks for Entanglement Generation. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 4387–4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fujii, G.; Akimoto, Y. Electromagnetic-Acoustic Biphysical Cloak Designed through Topology Optimization. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 6090–6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fujii, G.; Akimoto, Y. Cloaking a Concentrator in Thermal Conduction via Topology Optimization. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2020, 159, 120082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hua, Y.; Qian, C.; Chen, H.; Wang, H. Experimental Topology-Optimized Cloak for Water Waves. Mater. Today Phys. 2022, 27, 100754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lan, L.; Sun, F.; Liu, Y.; Ong, C.K.; Ma, Y. Experimentally Demonstrated a Unidirectional Electromagnetic Cloak Designed by Topology Optimization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 121113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vial, B.; Torrico, M.M.; Hao, Y. Optimized Microwave Illusion Device. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D. Nanoscale Thermal Cloaking in Silicon Film: A Molecular Dynamic Study. Materials 2022, 15, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sharon, M.; Rodriguez, S.A.L.; Sharon, C. Nanotechnology in the Defense Industry; Wiley-Scrivener Publisher: Beverly, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kumar, N.; Dixit, A. Camouflage and Stealth Technology Based on Nanomaterials. In Nanotechnology for Defence Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 155–203. [Google Scholar]
  55. Monti, A.; Alù, A.; Toscano, A.; Bilotti, F. Optical Invisibility through Metasurfaces Made of Plasmonic Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 123103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhang, B. Design, Implementation, and Extension of Thermal Invisibility Cloaks. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 053402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ozbay, E.; Temelkuran, B.; Bayindir, M. Microwave Applications of Photonic Crystals. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2003, 41, 185–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Shishkin, I.; Baranov, D.; Slobozhanyuk, A.; Filonov, D.; Lukashenko, S.; Samusev, A.; Belov, P. Microwave Platform as a Valuable Tool for Characterization of Nanophotonic Devices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jahani, S.; Kim, S.; Atkinson, J.; Wirth, J.C.; Kalhor, F.; Noman, A.A.; Newman, W.D.; Shekhar, P.; Han, K.; Van, V.; et al. Controlling Evanescent Waves Using Silicon Photonic All-Dielectric Metamaterials for Dense Integration. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Minin, I.V.; Minin, O.V.; Glinskiy, I.A.; Khabibullin, R.A.; Malureanu, R.; Lavrinenko, A.V.; Yakubovsky, D.I.; Arsenin, A.V.; Volkov, V.S.; Ponomarev, D.S. Plasmonic Nanojet: An Experimental Demonstration. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3244–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Minin, I.V.; Minin, O.V.; Glinskiy, I.A.; Khabibullin, R.A.; Malureanu, R.; Lavrinenko, A.; Yakubovsky, D.I.; Volkov, V.S.; Ponomarev, D.S. Experimental Verification of a Plasmonic Hook in a Dielectric Janus Particle. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 131107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lumerical. Available online: http://www.lumerical.com/tcad-products/fdtd/ (accessed on 19 October 2022).
  63. Weir, W.B. Automatic Measurement of Complex Dielectric Constant and Permeability at Microwave Frequencies. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng. 1974, 62, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Minin, I.V.; Minin, O.V. Mesotronics: Some New, Unusual Optical Effects. Photonics 2022, 9, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Oskooi, F.; Roundy, D.; Ibanescu, M.; Bermel, P.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Johnson, S.G. MEEP: A Flexible Free Software Package for Electromagnetic Simulations by the FDTD Method. Comput. Phys. Commun 2010, 181, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Berenger, J.-P. A Perfectly Matched Layer for the Absorption of Electromagnetic Waves. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 114, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McGuirk, J.S.; Collins, P.J. Controlling the Transmitted Field into a Cylindrical Cloak’s Hidden Region. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 17560–17573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ang, P.; Eleftheriades, G.V. Active Cloaking of a Non-Uniform Scatterer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lu, C.; Mei, Z.L.; Tang, W.X.; Cui, T.J. Manipulating Scattering Features by Metamaterials. EPJ Appl. Metamater. 2016, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Urzhumov, Y.; Landy, N.; Driscoll, T.; Basov, D.; Smith, D.R. Thin Low-Loss Dielectric Coatings for Free-Space Cloaking. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 1606–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation and the design approach of the cloaking structure and (b) three-dimensional view of the designed cloaking structure with physical dimensions of each unit cell and the PEC object. The letter “K” indicates applied symmetry effect to the structure.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation and the design approach of the cloaking structure and (b) three-dimensional view of the designed cloaking structure with physical dimensions of each unit cell and the PEC object. The letter “K” indicates applied symmetry effect to the structure.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g001
Figure 2. The numerically calculated (a) magnetic field, (b) phase distributions, and (c) their cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for the PEC, fully filled structure with PEC and a randomly filled structure with PEC, respectively from top to bottom. The black arrows indicate the incident waves which propagate in the x-direction. The dashed circles represent the boundaries of the PEC material and the obtained structures. The position profiles at the input and output of the cross sections are signified by the vertical dashed lines. All calculations were performed at 10 GHz.
Figure 2. The numerically calculated (a) magnetic field, (b) phase distributions, and (c) their cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for the PEC, fully filled structure with PEC and a randomly filled structure with PEC, respectively from top to bottom. The black arrows indicate the incident waves which propagate in the x-direction. The dashed circles represent the boundaries of the PEC material and the obtained structures. The position profiles at the input and output of the cross sections are signified by the vertical dashed lines. All calculations were performed at 10 GHz.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g002
Figure 3. The calculated (a) magnetic field and phase distributions, (b) cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for x-direction injection for optimized structure. The calculated (c) magnetic field and phase distributions, (d) cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for y-direction injection for optimized structure. The black arrows indicate the incident waves. The dashed circles represent the boundaries of the PEC material and the optimized structures. The position profiles at the input and output of the cross sections are signified by the vertical dashed lines. All calculations were performed at 10 GHz.
Figure 3. The calculated (a) magnetic field and phase distributions, (b) cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for x-direction injection for optimized structure. The calculated (c) magnetic field and phase distributions, (d) cross-sectional amplitude and phase profiles at the front and back cross sections for y-direction injection for optimized structure. The black arrows indicate the incident waves. The dashed circles represent the boundaries of the PEC material and the optimized structures. The position profiles at the input and output of the cross sections are signified by the vertical dashed lines. All calculations were performed at 10 GHz.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g003
Figure 4. The numerically calculated scattering field of (a) PEC, (b) randomly filled structure with PEC and (c) optimized structure with PEC at 10 GHz in the free space.
Figure 4. The numerically calculated scattering field of (a) PEC, (b) randomly filled structure with PEC and (c) optimized structure with PEC at 10 GHz in the free space.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g004
Figure 5. The plots of cost values with (a) averaged scattered field values and with (b) transmission efficiency values for selected frequency intervals. The numerically calculated magnetic field distributions at (c) 8.7 GHz, (d) 8.8 GHz, (e) 9.2 GHz, (f) 9.6 GHz, (g) 10.48 GHz, (h) 10.52 GHz, (i) 11.3 GHz, and (j) 11.7 GHz.
Figure 5. The plots of cost values with (a) averaged scattered field values and with (b) transmission efficiency values for selected frequency intervals. The numerically calculated magnetic field distributions at (c) 8.7 GHz, (d) 8.8 GHz, (e) 9.2 GHz, (f) 9.6 GHz, (g) 10.48 GHz, (h) 10.52 GHz, (i) 11.3 GHz, and (j) 11.7 GHz.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g005
Figure 6. (a) The schematic representation of the experimental setup with a photo of the fabricated cloaking structure and a brass object that is used as PEC. Experimentally measured magnetic field representations of (b) free space, (c) PEC and (d) optimized structure with PEC, respectively. (e) Experimentally measured cross sectional amplitude profile and (f) cross sectional phase profile. (g) Averaged scattering field values for selected frequency intervals. The black vertical dashed lines are signified the positions of the cross sections.
Figure 6. (a) The schematic representation of the experimental setup with a photo of the fabricated cloaking structure and a brass object that is used as PEC. Experimentally measured magnetic field representations of (b) free space, (c) PEC and (d) optimized structure with PEC, respectively. (e) Experimentally measured cross sectional amplitude profile and (f) cross sectional phase profile. (g) Averaged scattering field values for selected frequency intervals. The black vertical dashed lines are signified the positions of the cross sections.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g006
Figure 7. (a) Schematic representation and the design approach of the cloaking structure that operates in three directions. Blue arrows demonstrate the incident wave directions with corresponding incident angles. (b) Calculated magnetic field, (c) phase distributions, and (d) scattering field distributions for incident directions of 0°, 60°, and 120°. Black and white dashed lines demonstrate the boundaries of the PEC and cloaking structure. (e) Photographic illustration of the 3D printed cloaking structure and a brass object inside at top and perspective views. Again, red colored arrows demonstrate the incident wave directions.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic representation and the design approach of the cloaking structure that operates in three directions. Blue arrows demonstrate the incident wave directions with corresponding incident angles. (b) Calculated magnetic field, (c) phase distributions, and (d) scattering field distributions for incident directions of 0°, 60°, and 120°. Black and white dashed lines demonstrate the boundaries of the PEC and cloaking structure. (e) Photographic illustration of the 3D printed cloaking structure and a brass object inside at top and perspective views. Again, red colored arrows demonstrate the incident wave directions.
Nanomaterials 12 04194 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ayik, M.; Kurt, H.; Minin, O.V.; Minin, I.V.; Turduev, M. Multi-Directional Cloak Design by All-Dielectric Unit-Cell Optimized Structure. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234194

AMA Style

Ayik M, Kurt H, Minin OV, Minin IV, Turduev M. Multi-Directional Cloak Design by All-Dielectric Unit-Cell Optimized Structure. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(23):4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ayik, Muratcan, Hamza Kurt, Oleg V. Minin, Igor V. Minin, and Mirbek Turduev. 2022. "Multi-Directional Cloak Design by All-Dielectric Unit-Cell Optimized Structure" Nanomaterials 12, no. 23: 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234194

APA Style

Ayik, M., Kurt, H., Minin, O. V., Minin, I. V., & Turduev, M. (2022). Multi-Directional Cloak Design by All-Dielectric Unit-Cell Optimized Structure. Nanomaterials, 12(23), 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop