Next Article in Journal
Nanoparticles Surface Chemistry Influence on Protein Corona Composition and Inflammatory Responses
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of a Time-Dependent Electroviscous and Hybrid Nanofluid with Darcy-Forchheimer Effect between Squeezing Plates
Previous Article in Journal
Amino-Functionalized Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes as Efficient Basic Catalysts for the Formation of γ-Lactams: Synthesis of N-1-Heptenyl-2-pyrrolidinone
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Understanding of Water Properties inside Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Nanocomposites of Rigid Polyurethane Foam and Graphene Nanoplates Obtained by Exfoliation of Natural Graphite in Polymeric 4,4′-Diphenylmethane Diisocyanate

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(4), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12040685
by Se-Ra Shin 1 and Dai-Soo Lee 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(4), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12040685
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 12 February 2022 / Published: 18 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Carbon Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper describes the   effect of graphene nanoparticles on the mechanical and thermal properties of rigid plyurethane foams.  The manuscript is usually clear and well organized and needs minor revision work to be suitable for publication in Nanomaterials. In the following my detailed comments:

  • Page 4, table 1. Units are completely missing. Please add units where necessary.
  • Page 6. Observing Figure 1 it is possible to see a D peak in the starting graphite, which is not usually observed in HOPG graphite. Therefore, the presence of an increased D peak in the exfoliated graphene is not surprising, with a lower quality of the graphene. Some comment will increase the clarity of the report.
  • Figure captions are usually extremely short. A more detailed caption help the reader. In particular in the caption of Figure 4 are not reported at all the measurement parameters such as accelerating voltage and current which is an important parameter in TEM imaging.
  • Page 9, Table 2. There is an inconsistency in the data reported. The number of cell per unit surface of G0.1 is lower than the Control one, with a lower cell dimension. Please check.

 

After these revisions, I could recommend the publication of this manuscript in Nanomaterials.

Author Response

A PDF file replying to Reviewer 1 was attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find attached my comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

A PDF file replying to reviewer 2 was attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript reports the dispersion of graphene in rigid poly(urethane) foams to improve the thermal properties of these materials. The compositions generated are referred to as "nanocomposites" although no good evidence is presented to support this (in fact, modulus is not improved in some cases by the presence of graphene). How is it known that these are not simple filled polymers? This needs to be clarified either by providing some evidence or referring to previous reports which establish the formation of graphene/poly(urethane) composite structures.

The manuscript will require revision for clarity and readability prior to publication. Corrections are penciled-in directly on pages of the manuscript attached. These are illustrative of the kinds of changes needed throughout. In rewriting, careful attention should be paid to the use of articles, tenses and proper sentence structure. Extraneous phrases such as "to the best of our knowledge" should be avoided. A figure cannot "show"; particular properties may be displayed in a figure. Author's names, et. al., and personal pronouns should be omitted.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

A PDF file replying to reviewer 3 was attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The manuscript " Nanocomposites of rigid polyurethane foam and graphene nanoplates obtained by exfoliation of natural graphite in polymeric 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate" fits in  the rigors of your journal and I recommend its publication. I make the following recommendations:

  1. The references must  be updated.
  2. A list with abbreviation would  be very necessary to make the entire text more easy readable.
  3. The practical implications of the research must be emphasized.
  4. The expression "it is postulated" used sometimes in the text is not suitable and the corresponding sentences must be reformulated.

Author Response

A PDF file replying to reviewer 4 was attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript is much improved. However, the abstract opens with an incomplete sentence. Composite formation has not been demonstrated but has been addressed.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Comments are highly appreciated and answers to the comments are attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop