Next Article in Journal
Coronene and Phthalocyanine Trapping Efficiency of a Two-Dimensional Kagomé Host-Nanoarchitecture
Previous Article in Journal
Radiosensitization Effect of Gold Nanoparticles on Plasmid DNA Damage Induced by Therapeutic MV X-rays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Early Stages of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Growth on Silicon Nanowires

1
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Physics and Earth Science (MIFT), University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres, 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
2
Institute for the Microelectronics and Microsystems (IMM), National Research Council (CNR), Catania Headquarters (HQ), Strada Ottava 5, Zona Industriale, 95121 Catania, Italy
3
Institute for the Microelectronics and Microsystems (IMM), National Research Council (CNR), Catania University, Via S. Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
4
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(5), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050772
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 20 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nanophotonics Materials and Devices)

Abstract

:
Aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) is an electrically conductive and optically transparent material with many applications in optoelectronics and photovoltaics as well as in the new field of plasmonic metamaterials. Most of its applications contemplate the use of complex and nanosized materials as substrates onto which the AZO forms the coating layer. Its morphological characteristics, especially the conformality and crystallographic structure, are crucial because they affect its opto-electrical response. Nevertheless, it was difficult to find literature data on AZO layers deposited on non-planar structures. We studied the AZO growth on silicon-nanowires (SiNWs) to understand its morphological evolution when it is formed on quasi one-dimensional nanostructures. We deposited by sputtering different AZO thicknesses, leading from nanoclusters until complete incorporation of the SiNWs array was achieved. At the early stages, AZO formed crystalline nano-islands. These small clusters unexpectedly contained detectable Al, even in these preliminary phases, and showed a wurtzite crystallographic structure. At higher thickness, they coalesced by forming a conformal polycrystalline shell over the nanostructured substrate. As the deposition time increased, the AZO conformal deposition led to a polycrystalline matrix growing between the SiNWs, until the complete array incorporation and planarization. After the early stages, an interesting phenomenon took place leading to the formation of hook-curved SiNWs covered by AZO. These nanostructures are potentially very promising for optical, electro-optical and plasmonic applications.
Keywords:
AZO; silicon; nanowires; STEM; EELS

1. Introduction

Silicon-nanowires (SiNWs) are interesting nanostructures whose properties are useful for many applications in nano-electronics. They are used to engineer the emitter of a new photodiodes class with a non-planar configuration [1], can be exploited as architectures to make radial and axial junctions [2,3,4], can act as light-trapping structures to improve the optical path [5], and can be used as powerful building blocks to realize high mobility channels in field effect transistors [6], biosensors [7] and catalysts [8]. A transparent electrode is required in many of these technologies; the transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) are the most often used materials [9,10]. TCOs must have a bandgap greater than 3.1 eV to be effective in transmitting photons of visible light without exciting electrons from the valence to the conduction band, granting improved structural, thermal and optical properties [11]. TCOs integration in the final devices is difficult and currently represents a challenge, as it must meet some conditions such as being conformal to the nanostructure geometry, as well as to ensure at the same time good opto-electrical and mechanical properties. Moreover, it should be made of non-toxic, eco-friendly, and inexpensive materials. Among these, aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) has been gaining ground for large-scale applications. Solar cells, flat panel displays, and light-emitting diodes are just some examples of where AZO is used [12,13,14]. Its success is mainly due to its lateral conductivity improvement as well as its good optical and surface passivation properties [15]. Moreover, it has a direct wide bandgap of 3.37 eV and a large exciton binding energy of ~60 meV [16]. It is also mechanically resistant [17], exhibits an intrinsic n-type behavior due to crystal defects and allows heavy doping [18], in addition to being abundant, inexpensive and non-toxic [19]. The TCOs morphology affects the transparency of the component and the excitonic propagation length. Indeed, crystallinity is needed for both transparency and efficient exitonic propagation, which controls the electrical conductivity [20]. For large-scale nano electro-optical applications based on SiNWs, efficient passivation and chemical stability of the active area are essential, as are good electrical characteristics. Therefore, it is useful to understand the interaction between AZO and the structured substrate and how it evolved SiNWs from the beginning of the deposition, because this determines the final characteristics of the material. Currently, there is no literature available on the early deposition phases, especially when substrates with complex shapes, as in the case of SiNWs, are involved.
In this work, we synthesized and studied a system composed of the combination of AZO and SiNWs; we focused on the early stages of AZO formation on the nanostructures. SiNWs arrays were grown via inductively coupled chemical vapor deposition (CVD) through the vapor liquid solid (VLS) mechanism, using Au clusters as catalysts [21]. The coating of SiNWs with AZO was pursued by sputtering. Sputtering is known to allow for faster processing and lower costs than other techniques and does not require ultra-high vacuum conditions; indeed, it is the most used technique for TCO fabrication. We aimed at investigating the nucleation and growth mechanisms and how the formation of the layer evolves as the amount of deposit increases. We showed results on AZO-coated SiNWs in terms of chemical composition of the deposited material and its morphology, evaluating its conformality with respect to the substrates. The oxide structure was analyzed at the atomic level, observing its crystalline nature and defining its phase from the first deposition steps up to a hundred nanometers. In the early stages, the deposited AZO assembled on the nanowires in the form of nanoclusters decorating them along their entire length. This study provides important insights for the application of AZO-decorated SiNWs as transparent electrodes or innovative plasmon metamaterials. The plasmonic behavior of SiNWs in the near UV and visible regions is not yet completely clear, despite being extremely interesting regions to many fields of applications. It is known that the plasmonic characteristics and, therefore, the functionality of devices that exploit this phenomenon are sensitive to the material that surrounds the structure through its refractive index. Hence, we expected that it could be possible to modulate the plasmonic resonances of these nano systems by controlling the morphology and the amount of deposited AZO. The above properties together with the low costs open the way, in the future, for large-scale use of such SiNWs/AZO combined systems for plasmonic functionalities and photovoltaics.

2. Materials and Methods

The substrate used was CZ <100> 13 Ωcm p type 6″ Si wafer. The samples were cleaned in a sonicating bath of acetone, ethanol and water for about 5 min each. Then, a dip in HF (1%) was performed to remove the native oxide film. Once dried, the substrate was loaded into the sputter chamber for the Au deposition at a pressure of 5 × 10−5 mbar and current of 10 mA for 60 s. The equivalent Au thickness deposited was about 2 nm (monitored by in situ quartz balance). After a second brief HF dip, the substrate was transferred into the CVD chamber, where it was heated at 380 °C for 1 h under vacuum to allow for the formation of the euthectic. Then, the monosilane (SiH4) and Ar were introduced in the CVD chamber and the SiNWs growth took place at 380 °C for 30 min with a pressure equal to 20 mTorr and a plasma power of 20 W. The SiH4/Ar ratio was fixed to 30. Once the SiNWs growth was complete and the sample was exposed to the atmosphere, a compliant layer of native silica of about 2 nm thick surrounding the wires was immediately produced. After VLS growth, SiNWs underwent a two-step procedure for the Au removal: 5 min HF etch, then, a gold etch containing sodium iodide (NaI) and iodine (I2) for 4 min. After, the wafer was cut into 2 cm2 square pieces used for the AZO deposition. Each sample was introduced individually into the sputter deposition chamber. In the current work, a commercial AZO disk as target for the sputtering was used, with zinc oxide–aluminum oxide, 97-3 wt%, 50.8 mm dia. × 3.18 mm thick, 99.99% purity, 97% Zn oxide, 3% Al oxide, % by weight. No rotation was imposed to the substrates during the depositions; their surface was parallel with respect to the source. The wafer holder was not purposely heated. The plasma was triggered by radio frequency (RF). The pressure in the chamber was equal to about 3 × 10−3 mbar; the power was equal to 50 W. The thickness of the deposited material was chosen based on a previous calibration that returned a deposition rate equal to 0.04 nm/s. The process times chosen varied from a few seconds to about 4 h for the thicker layers. Four different AZO equivalent thicknesses were deposited: 2 nm, 20 nm, 100 nm and 500 nm. The samples obtained were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM). The SEM analyses were obtained by a Supra35 FE-SEM (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The TEM analyses were performed by using a JEOL ARM200F (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) Cs-corrected microscope, equipped with a cold-field emission gun and operating at 200 keV. Micrographs were acquired by high-angle annular dark field (HAADF). The diffraction analysis was used to study the crystal lattice of the deposit. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) provided information on the chemical composition of the clusters and of the layers. The EELS measurements were obtained by using a GIF Quantum ER system (Gatan AMETEK, Pleasanton, CA, USA). EELS spectra were acquired with the EELS tool through Gatan DigitalMicrograph software Version 3.4 (Gatan AMETEK, Pleasanton, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the SiNWs array obtained after the CVD growth and used as a substrate for the AZO depositions. SiNWs had diameters ranging between 5 and 35 nm and lengths between 50 and 500 nm, in some cases reaching the micron. Unlike other growth methods [22], the SiNWs grown with our method were straight and oblique due to the crystallographic plane orientation effect of the Si substrate on which they were grown [23,24].
Figure 2a–c show one Si-NW imaged in HAADF STEM mode from the sample subjected to the AZO deposition of 2 nm equivalent thickness, observed at different magnifications. Figure 2a reveals a clear deposit made of quasi 0-dimensional nanoclusters with sizes smaller than 10 nm and size-distributed on the surface.
Figure 2d,e report the EELS spectra in the most significant energy ranges, i.e., from 70 to 160 eV and from 500 to 1400 eV, respectively, for the same Si-NW, extracted from the cluster region as indicated by the red box in the dark field STEM image in Figure 2c. The signal in Figure 2d at energies larger than 78 eV is due to Al L-edge, while the peak at about 90 eV is relative to the Zn3p [25]. The doublet located at 537 and 556 eV in Figure 2e is due to the O1s and the signals at about 1022 and 1045 eV are due to Zn2p 3/2 and ½, respectively [26]. The EELS spectrum backgrounds were subtracted using a power law model.
The data presented in the literature on the O peak, for planar AZO films, were mainly obtained by XPS analysis with different energy scale calibration [27]. So, our results obtained by EELS spectroscopy provide a new useful reference. The presence of the Zn and O EELS peaks indicated that the grain was composed of ZnO; the Al signal observed in the cluster structure confirmed the presence of the metal atoms inside the grain, suggesting that the sputtered material was, in fact, AZO and not simple ZnO, even at this low deposition thickness. This result was surprising, as the small size of the AZO clusters and the small amount of dopant made their characterization difficult; it is also statistically possible to find undoped nanostructures [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Based on findings in the literature, the Al signal at 78 eV in Figure 2d can be ascribed to the Al-O bond, as expected for the Al-doped ZnO, which presents an atomic structure where the Al3+ ions substitute Zn2+ ions in the lattice [26,34,35].
The lattice parameters and the degree of crystallinity of the deposited AZO are important information because they determine its optical and electrical characteristics. Figure 3a shows the high-resolution STEM image of an Si-NW deposited in the same conditions used for the previous sample, i.e., with 2 nm of AZO equivalent thickness (as in Figure 2). The lattice planes of the clusters were clearly distinguishable (see the inset, which is a magnification of one of the crystalline AZO grains), demonstrating their crystalline nature. The nanocrystals were oriented in different directions from each other. The signal intensity profile shown in Figure 3b was extracted from the light blue box shown in (a). The measured interplanar distance for the specific crystallographic direction was 2.48 Å, which is compatible with the wurtzite crystal structure, with the (100) planes having an interplanar distance equal to 2.488 Å [36,37].
The thickness of sputtered AZO was then increased to study the evolution of the system morphology in the subsequent deposition steps. Figure 4 shows the results for the sample on which the 20 nm thick AZO layer was deposited. The cross-SEM micrograph in Figure 4a shows that the SiNWs maintained their oblique orientation with respect to the substrate when the thickness of material deposited increased up to 20 nm. The polycrystalline Si layer at the base of the SiNWs was covered by a very thin AZO film, as demonstrated by local EDX analysis, not shown here. The blue rectangle indicates the area from which the EDX spectrum shown in Figure 4b was extracted. i.e., from one nanowire. It can be seen that the dominant species was Si, as expected. The presence of Zn, O and Al signals confirmed that the deposited shell was composed of AZO. The coverage, in any case, was uniform and conformal for the entire length of the wires and independent of the SiNWs tilt.
Figure 4c shows the STEM micrograph taken on the same sample, showing that the layer of AZO coated its entire surface. It allowed us to state that the clusters formed in the first deposition steps evolved into a continuous film onto the nanowires surface, probably by following a mechanism growth similar to “Island growth”, also known as “Volmer–Weber” [15], where the small clusters, nucleated separately on the Si-NW surface, grow as three-dimensional islands, and eventually coalesce to form a continuous film.
Figure 5 shows the SEM micrographs (a) and TEM (b,c) in cross view of AZO with a nominal thickness of 100 nm. It could be immediately observed that there were no empty spaces in the AZO shell. The most striking difference from the previous cases was that the core-shell SiNWs-AZO appeared curved. To understand SiNWs-AZO bending observed in Figure 5, we explored several possible explanations. The effect of the weight force exerted by the AZO mass deposited (of the order of 10−14 g per wire, making the hypothesis of a cylindrical wire 30 nm large, 450 nm long and a total diameter SiNWs + AZO equal to 130 nm) can be excluded, since the wires’ Young’s modulus reported in the literature for silicon nanowires of similar size is of the order of one hundred GPa [38]. Previous work shows the bending of SiNWs after the implantation of Ga ions accelerated at energies of the order of tens of KeV [39]. In that case, the bending was attributed to structural changes in crystallinity following implantation and not to the momentum transferred from the Ga ions to the wires. In our case the AZO deposition was done at 50 W, with an acceleration voltage of about 0.1 kV, so that a bending of the SiNWs as a consequence of the AZO impact was not probable. The possible strain effect exerted by the thick AZO onto the much thinner Si-NW, causing the elongation/deformation of the Si crystalline cell, could also be excluded because the AZO shell was polycrystalline, as already demonstrated. A possible explanation could be the effect of the magnetic field on the piezoelectric AZO: its effect could be reset at the end of the deposition on the thin layers, but not on the thick ones, because those could ‘encage’ the SiNWs core inside a rigid shell.
This observed phenomenon could have interesting applications because this particular morphology can be used as a tool to control both the electrical conductivity as well the optical properties of the system. Indeed, the literature reports that the photo-response performance increases by bending ZnO nanowires [40,41].
It should be noted that, by increasing the nominal thickness from 20 to 100 nm, the two-dimensional AZO film deposited at the interface with the substrate, between the SiNWs, did not significantly increase its thickness. Decreasing a material dimension to the nanoscale, the surface/volume ratio, as well as the dangling bond density increased, resulting in a more favored adhesion of AZO on SiNWs [42,43]. These sites were at higher energy than they were in the ideal crystalline lattice. In this way, it could be explained why the AZO thickness was greater on the Si-NW surface than on the substrate. We also point out that, already in these deposition conditions, without further increasing the AZO thickness, the nanowire array was embedded in the AZO layer. The structure could then guarantee, in a device where the Si-NW array works as an emitter, the electrical contact over the nanostructured layer.
As the sputtering time further increased, the amount of material grew and the morphology of the system changed. Figure 6a depicts the cross-SEM of the 500 nm thick AZO sample. A planarized polycrystalline AZO matrix, with the embedded SiNWs, was produced. From these observations, it could be deduced that the sputtered material initially settled on the wires and on the Si at the interface, but that the production of the thick AZO layer did not start before all wires has been conformally and fully coated. The diffraction patterns shown in Figure 6b were carried out on a large area of the deposited bulk AZO matrix. Stretched spots inside the diffraction pattern were present, indicating that AZO was poly-crystalline and that the domains consisted of several smaller crystals with preferential crystallographic orientation. The interatomic distances measured from the diffraction pattern, 2.82 Å, 2.48 Å, 1.92 Å and 1.63 Å, corresponded to those of the ZnO in the wurtzite phase. In particular, the distance of 2.82 Å (<101> plane in wurtzite) did not appear among those of the zinc-blende; therefore, the possibility that the AZO was in this phase can be excluded. The crystallinity obtained was an encouraging result for good electrical conductivity, which is needed for any electronic applications. As the deposited AZO thickness increased, i.e., when the AZO clusters coalesced to form a compact shell, our preliminary electrical investigations—not reported here—showed that the electrical conductivity increased, although a deep investigation about electrical properties of the systems is still in progress.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we investigated the morphology of AZO on SiNWs, to understand its morphological and chemical evolution when deposited on substrates with complex shapes. Different nominal oxide thicknesses from 2 up to 500 nm were deposited. The 2 nm thick AZO turned out to be composed of nanoclusters distributed on the wire walls. Aluminum was detected even inside these initial small nanoclusters. The structure analysis revealed that the clusters were crystalline, with an interplanar distance that corresponded to that of the lattice in wurtzite phase. The 20 nm thick specimen showed a conformal two-dimensional AZO shell encapsulating the wires, probably produced according to the Volmer–Weber growth mechanism. By increasing the deposited oxide thickness, the AZO coating on the wires maintained the two-dimensionality without the appearance of empty spaces within it. With increasing the deposition thickness from 20 nm to 100 nm, we found that the thickness of the AZO film, deposited onto the Si substrate between the SiNWs, remained almost constant. This suggests a greater affinity of AZO for the Si-NW surfaces. A noteworthy aspect is that oxide-coated SiNWs, with nominal thickness of 100 nm, appeared hook-shaped after the deposition process. In the literature, it has been reported that the photo-response performance increased by bending ZnO nanowires; this aspect could be significant for their applications. The deposited AZO material exhibited a wurtzite crystalline structure, from the very early stages up to the bulk deposition. Bent composite structures, as well as the cluster decorated nanowires, can find applications in advanced plasmonic and optical systems.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. Conceptualization, R.A.P.; investigation, G.B., C.B., S.C., S.S., A.T., G.T., R.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, R.A.P., S.P.; supervision, R.A.P., S.P.; project administration, S.P., A.L.M.; funding acquisition, S.P., A.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors R. Puglisi and A. La Magna acknowledges financial support by the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR) in the framework of the National Project PON EleGaNTe (Electronics on GaN-based Technologies), Grant No. ARS01_01007.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this article are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

R.A.P. wishes to thank Salvatore Di Franco and Markus Italia (CNR-IMM) for valuable contributions during the sample synthesis and characterizations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kempa, T.J.; Cahoon, J.F.; Kim, S.K.; Day, R.W.; Bell, D.C.; Park, H.G.; Lieber, C.M. Coaxial multishell nanowires with high-quality electronic interfaces and tunable optical cavities for ultrathin photovoltaics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ahmed, N.; Ramasamy, P.; Bhargav, P.B.; Rayerfrancis, A.; Chandra, B. Development of silicon nanowires with optimized characteristics and fabrication of radial junction solar cells with <100 nm amorphous silicon absorber layer. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 106, 104778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Misra, S.; Yu, L.; Foldyna, M.; Roca, I.; Cabarrocas, P. High efficiency and stable hy- drogenated amorphous silicon radial junction solar cells built on VLS-grown silicon nanowires. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2013, 118, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jung, Y.; Vacic, A.; Perea, D.E.; Picraux, S.T.; Reed, M.A. Minority carrier life- times and surface effects in VLS-grown axial p-n junction silicon nanowires. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4306–4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garnett, E.; Yang, P. Light Trapping in Silicon Nanowire Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cui, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, W.U.; Lieber, C.M. High performance silicon nanowire field effect transistors. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, S.; Zhang, B.; Shao, Z.; He, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jie, J.; Zhang, X. Ultraminiaturized Stretchable Strain Sensors Based on Single Silicon Nanowires for Imperceptible Electronic Skins. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 2478–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shao, M.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.D.D.; Lee, S.T. Excellent photocatalysis of HF-treated silicon nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 17738–17739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ginley, D.S.; Bright, C. Transparent conducting oxides. MRS Bull. 2000, 25, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kawashima, T.; Ezure, T.; Okada, K.; Matsui, H.; Goto, K.; Tanabe, N. FTO/ITO double-layered transparent conductive oxide for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2004, 164, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Woods-Robinson, R.; Han, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ablekim, T.; Khan, I.; Persson, K.A.; Zakutayev, A. Wide Band Gap Chalcogenide Semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 4007–4055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Granqvist, C.G. Transparent conductors as solar energy materials: A panoramic review. Sol. Energy Mater Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 1529–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boscarino, S.; Crupi, I.; Mirabella, S.; Simone, F.; Terrasi, A. TCO/Ag/TCO transparent electrodes for solar cells application. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2014, 116, 1287–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shabani, A.; Nezhad, M.K.; Rahmani, N.; Mishra, Y.K.; Sanyal, B.; Adam, J. Revisiting the Optical Dispersion of Aluminium-Doped Zinc Oxide: New Perspectives for Plasmonics and Metamaterials. Adv. Photonics Res. 2020, 2, 2000086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sarma, B.; Barman, D.; Sarma, B.K. AZO (Al:ZnO) thin films with high figure of merit as stable indium free transparent conducting oxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 479, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Lin, C.; Xu, C. Structure and optoelectronic properties of AZO/Al/AZO tri-layer films grown on flexible substrates. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 3495–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Torrisi, G.; Crupi, I.; Mirabella, S.; Terrasi, A. Robustness and electrical reliability of AZO/Ag/AZO thin film after bending stress. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 165, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kar, J.P.; Kim, S.; Shin, B.; Park, K.I.; Ahn, K.J.; Lee, W.; Cho, J.H.; Myoung, J.M. Influence of sputtering pressure on morphological, mechanical and electrical properties of Al-doped ZnO films. Solid-State Electron. 2010, 54, 1447–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miao, D.; Jiang, S.-X.K.; Zhao, H.; Shang, S.; Chen, Z. Characterization of AZO and Ag based films prepared by RF magnetron sputtering. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 616, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lunt, R.R.; Benziger, J.B.; Forrest, S.R. Relationship between crystalline order and exciton diffusion length in molecular organic semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1233–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Puglisi, R.A.; Bongiorno, C.; Caccamo, S.; Fazio, E.; Mannino, G.; Neri, F.; Scalese, S.; Spucches, D.; Magna, A.L. Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Silicon Nanowires with Diameter Smaller Than 5 nm. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 17967–17971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Cheng, S.L.; Liao, S.Y.; Syu, J.H. Growth kinetics and surface properties of single-crystalline aluminum-doped zinc oxide nanowires on silicon substrates. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 5271–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schmidt, V.; Senz, S.; Gosele, U. Diameter-Dependent Growth Direction of Epitaxial Silicon Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 931–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Garozzo, C.; La Magna, A.; Mannino, G.; Privitera, V.; Scalese, S.; Sberna, P.M.; Simone, F.; Puglisi, R.A. Competition between uncatalyzed and catalyzed growth during the plasma synthesis of Si nanowires and its role on their optical properties. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 214313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jeong, S.H.; Boo, J.H. Influence of target-to-substrate distance on the properties of AZO films grown by RF magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Film. 2004, 447, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. French, R.H.; Mullejans, H.; Jones, D.J. Optical Properties of Aluminum Oxide: Determined from Vacuum Ultraviolet and Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopies. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 2549–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ballerini, G.; Ogle, K.; Barthés-Labrousse, M.G. The acid-base properties of the surface of native zinc oxide layers: An XPS study of adsorption of 1,2-diaminoethane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 6860–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qiu, Y.; Cristiano, F.; Huet, K.; Mazzamuto, F.; Fisicaro, G.; Magna, A.L.; Quillec, M.; Cherkashin, N.; Wang, H.; Duguay, S.; et al. Extended Defects Formation in Nanosecond Laser-Annealed Ion Implanted Silicon. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1769–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Di Russo, E.D.; Dalapati, P.; Houard, J.; Venturi, L.; Blum, I.; Moldovan, S.; Van Bia, N.L.; Lefebvre, D.; Hugues, M.; Chauveau, J.M.; et al. Super-resolution Optical Spectroscopy of Nanoscale Emitters within a Photonic Atom Probe. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 8733–8738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nanoelectronics: Doping difficulties deciphered. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 1. [CrossRef]
  31. Arduca, E.; Perego, M. Doping of silicon nanocrystals. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 62, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ossicini, S.; Iori, F.; Degoli, E.; Luppi, E.; Magri, R.; Poli, R.; Cantele, G.; Trani, F.; Ninno, D. Understanding doping in silicon nanostructures. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2006, 12, 1585–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Samadi, M.; Zirak, M.; Naseri, A.; Khorashadizade, E.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Recent progress on doped ZnO nanostructures for visible-light photocatalysis. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 605, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ozgur, U.; Alivov, Y.I.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.A.; Dogan, S.; Avrutin, V.; Cho, S.-J.; Morkoc, H. A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 041301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wu, M.; Sun, D.; Tan, C.; Tian, X.; Huang, Y. Al-Doped ZnO Monolayer as a Promising Transparent Electrode Material: A First-Principles Study. Materials 2017, 10, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Snedeker, L.P.; Risbud, A.S.; Masala, O.; Zhang, J.P.; Seshadri, R. Organic phase conversion of bulk (wurtzite) ZnO to nanophase (wurtzite and zinc blende) ZnO. Solid State Sci. 2005, 7, 1500–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perillo, P.M.; Atia, M.N.; Rodrıguez, D.F. Studies on the growth control of ZnO nanostructures synthesized by the chemical method. Matéria (Rio J.). 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Furmanchuk, A.; Isayev, O.; Dinadayalane, T.C.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Mechanical properties of silicon nanowires. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pecora, E.F.; Irrera, A.; Boninelli, S.; Romano, L.; Spinella, C.; Priolo, F. Nanoscale amorphization, bending and recrystallization in silicon nanowires. Appl. Phys. A 2011, 102, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  40. Greenberg, Y.; Kelrich, A.; Cohen, S.; Kar-Narayan, S.; Ritter, D.; Calahorra, Y. Strain-mediated bending of InP nanowires through the growth of an asymmetric InAs shell. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bharti, B.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, R. Superhydrophilic TiO2 thin film by nanometer scale surface roughness and dangling bonds. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 364, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gallet, J.J.; Bournel, F.; Rochet, F.; Kohler, U.; Kubsky, S.; Silly, M.G.; Sirotti, F.; Pierucci, D. Isolated silicon dangling bonds on a water-saturated n+-doped Si(001)-2 1 surface: An XPS and STM study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 7686–7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, P.; Wang, Z.Z.; Liu, K.H.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W.L.; Bai, X.D.; Wang, E.G. Pho- toconducting response on bending of individual ZnO nanowires. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 1002–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrograph in cross view of the as grown SiNWs array after the CVD deposition used as substrate for the AZO depositions.
Figure 1. SEM micrograph in cross view of the as grown SiNWs array after the CVD deposition used as substrate for the AZO depositions.
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g001
Figure 2. (ac) STEM images at different magnifications for the SiNW/AZO system. The equivalent thickness of the deposited AZO layer is 2 nm; the diameter of the Si-NW imaged is about 20 nm. The AZO clusters diameter is smaller than 10 nm. (d,e) EELS spectra extracted from significant region as shown by the red rectangle in (c).
Figure 2. (ac) STEM images at different magnifications for the SiNW/AZO system. The equivalent thickness of the deposited AZO layer is 2 nm; the diameter of the Si-NW imaged is about 20 nm. The AZO clusters diameter is smaller than 10 nm. (d,e) EELS spectra extracted from significant region as shown by the red rectangle in (c).
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g002
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution STEM image for 2 nm thick AZO layer deposited over one Si-NW. (b) Signal intensity profile of the AZO signal extracted from the area selected by the light blue box on a grain. The inset is a magnification of the analysed AZO crystalline grain.
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution STEM image for 2 nm thick AZO layer deposited over one Si-NW. (b) Signal intensity profile of the AZO signal extracted from the area selected by the light blue box on a grain. The inset is a magnification of the analysed AZO crystalline grain.
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g003
Figure 4. (a) Cross-SEM analysis of 20 nm thick AZO layer deposited on Si-NW. (b) EDX spectrum extracted from the NWs area referred to in letter a. (c) STEM micrograph of a single Si-NW coated with the equivalent 20 nm thickness of AZO.
Figure 4. (a) Cross-SEM analysis of 20 nm thick AZO layer deposited on Si-NW. (b) EDX spectrum extracted from the NWs area referred to in letter a. (c) STEM micrograph of a single Si-NW coated with the equivalent 20 nm thickness of AZO.
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g004
Figure 5. (a) SEM and (b,c) TEM microscopies in cross view of 100 nm thick AZO showing the conformal deposition of the oxide layer, the curved morphology of the nanostructure after the deposition and the inner silicon core with the AZO shell (b,c).
Figure 5. (a) SEM and (b,c) TEM microscopies in cross view of 100 nm thick AZO showing the conformal deposition of the oxide layer, the curved morphology of the nanostructure after the deposition and the inner silicon core with the AZO shell (b,c).
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g005
Figure 6. (a) SEM analysis in cross view of 500 nm AZO thick sample. (b) Diffraction pattern by electron beam carried out on to an area of the AZO layer as indicated by the dashed box in (a).
Figure 6. (a) SEM analysis in cross view of 500 nm AZO thick sample. (b) Diffraction pattern by electron beam carried out on to an area of the AZO layer as indicated by the dashed box in (a).
Nanomaterials 12 00772 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borgh, G.; Bongiorno, C.; Cosentino, S.; La Magna, A.; Patanè, S.; Scalese, S.; Terrasi, A.; Torrisi, G.; Puglisi, R.A. Early Stages of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Growth on Silicon Nanowires. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050772

AMA Style

Borgh G, Bongiorno C, Cosentino S, La Magna A, Patanè S, Scalese S, Terrasi A, Torrisi G, Puglisi RA. Early Stages of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Growth on Silicon Nanowires. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(5):772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borgh, Giovanni, Corrado Bongiorno, Salvatore Cosentino, Antonino La Magna, Salvatore Patanè, Silvia Scalese, Antonio Terrasi, Giacomo Torrisi, and Rosaria A. Puglisi. 2022. "Early Stages of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Growth on Silicon Nanowires" Nanomaterials 12, no. 5: 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050772

APA Style

Borgh, G., Bongiorno, C., Cosentino, S., La Magna, A., Patanè, S., Scalese, S., Terrasi, A., Torrisi, G., & Puglisi, R. A. (2022). Early Stages of Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Growth on Silicon Nanowires. Nanomaterials, 12(5), 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050772

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop