Next Article in Journal
Highly Selective Removal of Cationic Dyes from Wastewater by MgO Nanorods
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneously Enhancing the Strength, Plasticity, and Conductivity of Copper Matrix Composites with Graphene-Coated Submicron Spherical Copper
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Study on the Quenching Behavior of a Copper Cube in the Cellulose Nanofiber Solution

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(6), 1033; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061033
by Hundong Choi †, Subin Jeong † and Kwon-Yeong Lee *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(6), 1033; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12061033
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 19 March 2022 / Published: 21 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The current work investigated the quenching behavior of a copper cube immersed in cellulose nanofiber (CNF) solutions and D.I. water. Experimental characteristic data regarding the effects of the different concentrations of CNF quenchant on the heat transfer process were presented. Overall, I recommend that this paper be accepted by Nanomaterials after minor revision.

1. Line 112-118, the authors should give specific numbers of the calculation process of the Biot number.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

 

Comments and Suggestions for Authors-1

The authors investigated the momentum, heat transfer, and mass transfer behavior of Ree-Eyring nanoliquids through a stretching surface using the influence of magnetic dipoles and Koo and Klein-streuer model. I suggest the paper for minor revision. The suggested revisions can be found in the following:

  • Please clearly explain in the introduction section that what is the novelty of this article.
  • Include more details about cellulose nanofiber for the best interest of reader
  • Equations taken need references are details how it is taken here, equation 1 and 2.
  • Please clearly explain how did you validated your experiment ?
  • Please explain that how did you discretized the domain.
  • Should make comparison with previously published results.
  • It is hard to differentiate the curves shown in Fig. 3. There is very gap between the red line and blue line, what is show and why it is ?
  • Several asseverations throughout the text require to be supported by a citation.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop