Next Article in Journal
Superlattices of Gadolinium and Bismuth Based Thallium Dichalcogenides as Potential Magnetic Topological Insulators
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Tamm States of 2–5 nm Nanodiamond via Raman Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
The Voltammetric Detection of Cadaverine Using a Diamine Oxidase and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Functionalised Electrochemical Biosensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Tensile Strength of Spark Plasma Sintered AlMgB14 Ceramics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/nano13010037
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of cBN-hBN-SiCw Nanocomposite with Superior Hardness, Strength, and Toughness

by
Lei Sun
1,†,
Yitong Zou
1,†,
Mengdong Ma
1,2,*,
Guangqian Li
1,
Xiaoyu Wang
1,
Xiang Zhang
1,
Zewen Zhuge
1,
Bing Liu
1,
Yingju Wu
1,
Baozhong Li
1 and
Zhisheng Zhao
1,*
1
Center for High Pressure Science (CHiPS), State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
2
Macao Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao 999078, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(1), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010037
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Superhard Materials with Nanostructures)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanocomposites with one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) phases can demonstrate superior hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength. Cubic boron nitride-hexagonal boron nitride-silicon carbide whiskers (cBN-hBN-SiCw) nanocomposites with the simultaneous containing 1D SiCw and 2D hBN phases were successfully fabricated via the high-pressure sintering of a mixture of SiCw and cBN nanopowders. The hBN was generated in situ via the limited phase transition from cBN to hBN. Nanocomposites with 25 wt.% SiCw exhibited optimal comprehensive mechanical properties with Vickers hardness of 36.5 GPa, fracture toughness of 6.2 MPa·m1/2, and flexural strength of 687.4 MPa. Higher SiCw contents did not significantly affect the flexural strength but clearly decreased the hardness and toughness. The main toughening mechanism is believed to be a combination of hBN inter-layer sliding, SiCw pull-out, crack deflection, and crack bridging.

1. Introduction

Cubic boron nitride (cBN) has a wide range of industrial applications owing to its outstanding hardness, thermal conductivity, and chemical stability [1,2]. What is far more important is the ability of cBN to cut ferrous and carbide-forming hard substances where diamond completely fails [3]. Although single cBN crystals can be prepared under industrial pressure (≤6 GPa), the samples grown by high-pressure methods are size-limited to the millimeter scale [4]. In addition, the anisotropy of single cBN crystals brings inconvenience to subsequent processing and use. For the pure-phase polycrystalline cBN, whose mechanical properties even exceed those of single-crystal cBN, the successful synthesis of dense samples cannot be achieved without harsh pressure conditions (≥7.7 GPa), whether through the high-pressure phase transformation of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), amorphous boron nitride, onion boron nitride (oBN) or the high-pressure sintering of cBN [5,6,7,8,9].
cBN-based composites with metal or ceramic additives that are prepared under mild temperature and pressure conditions (≤6 GPa) with good performance are currently attracting extensive attention and undergoing rapid development [10,11]. Accordingly, two kinds of additives were extensively studied to fabricate cBN-based composites. One is metal additives of the groups IV, V, and VI of the periodic table and their compounds or other metallic elements such as aluminum, cobalt, and nickel [12,13,14]. Although metal additives can effectively reduce the sintering pressure and temperature, they adversely affect the mechanical properties of the composites. The other is ceramic additives with high hardness, high modulus, and high wear resistance, such as Al2O3 [15], SiAlON [16], and Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ) [17]. Among a multitude of ceramics additives, SiC as an efficient reinforcement material for cBN-based composites has received considerable attention because of its outstanding properties. The hardness of 80 wt.% cBN-15 wt.% TiC-5 wt.% SiC composites fabricated at 1350 °C under 5.5 GPa is 516.3 MPa, which is higher than the 224.9 MPa of the 95 wt.% cBN-5 wt.% Ti3SiC2 composite [18]. The cBN-AlN-Si3N4-SiC composites with PSN and Al as additives were fabricated by high-pressure sintering (5 GPa, 1450 °C). The sintered sample with the addition of 30 wt.% PSN and 10 wt.% Al showed a high hardness of 25.2 GPa, which is corresponding to a 26% increase compared with the value for the sample with the addition of 30 wt.% Al [19]. Thus, the type of additive has a direct impact on the mechanical properties of cBN-based composites, such as hardness, fracture toughness, flexural strength, and wear resistance.
Recently, low-dimensional ceramic materials have been the most widely chosen additives to fabricate high-performance composites [20,21,22,23,24,25]. One-dimensional (1D) materials involve nanofibers [20,26,27], nanotubes [21,22,28], and whiskers [23,24,25,29], which are singular structures with the lateral dimension in submicron or nanometer scale. One-dimensional materials are ideal systems for exploring various new phenomena at the nanoscale and studying the size and dimensionality dependence of functional properties. The addition of 1D ceramic materials can not only ensure the hardness and strength of composites but also overcome the intrinsic brittleness of ceramic composites. Taking this into account, SiC whiskers (SiCw) have been widely used as an additive for diverse ceramic-based composites. Whisker-reinforced composites of ZrB2-SiCw [20], Al2O3-SiCw [23], TiC-SiCw [30], SiC-SiCw [31], and Si3N4-SiCw [32] were reported. It was found that the fracture toughness of TiB2-SiCw composites was 7.8 MPa·m1/2, which is approximately 130% higher than that of the single TiB2 phase ceramic [33]. Two-dimensional (2D) materials are defined as crystalline materials consisting of single- or few-layer atoms, in which the in-plane interatomic interactions are much stronger than those along the stacking direction. Two-dimensional materials represented by graphene have been proven to be an ideal reinforcement to fabricate ceramic composites due to their large specific surface, high aspect ratio, and superior mechanical, thermal and electrical properties [34]. It was reported that the fracture toughness of Si3N4-graphene composites and B4C-graphene composites were substantially improved up 6.6 MPa·m1/2 and 8.76 MPa·m1/2, which is 135% and 131% higher than that of the corresponding pure-phase ceramics, respectively [35,36]. Similar to graphene, hBN has also shown great promise as a reinforcement and has been used in several ceramic composites [37,38,39,40,41,42]. It was found that fracture toughness and flexural strength of B4C-10 vol.% hBN composite were 4.2 MPa·m1/2 and 494 GPa, which were increased by ~75% and ~40% compared to the B4C ceramic in the absence of hBN, respectively [41]. Therefore, the introduction of appropriate 1D and 2D materials into cBN is conducive to improving the comprehensive performance of composites. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there are few reports on cBN composites with the simultaneous addition of 1D and 2D materials.
In this work, novel cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites were successfully fabricated via the high-pressure sintering of SiCw and cBN powder. The hBN was generated in situ by a limited transformation of cBN to hBN. The effects of the SiCw on the phase composition and mechanical properties of nanocomposites were systematically investigated, and the toughening mechanism of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites was also analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

The commercial powders including cBN particles (particle size of ~600 nm, >99.9% purity, InnoChem Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and SiC whiskers (diameter in the range of 0.2–1.2 μm, length in the range of 50–100 μm, Qinhuangdao Eno High-Tech Material Development Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao, China) were used as starting materials in our work. SiCw was mixed with cBN via alcohol using an agate mortar and pestle for about 1 h, and the scope of SiCw contents in mixtures is 0–30 wt.%. To get rid of impurities, the mixtures were treated in a vacuum (3.0 × 10−5 Pa) at 800 °C for 0.5 h and then quickly pre-pressed into a cylindrical pellet with Φ (diameter) = 5 mm × 5 mm and placed into an hBN crucible in order to get rid of the isolated the air. DS 6 × 8 MN cubic press machine (Guilin Guiye Machinery Co., Ltd., Guilin, China) was used to accomplish the high-pressure sintering experiments. The mixtures were slowly cold-compressed to 6 GPa and then heated to 1450 °C at a rate of 200 °C/min for 20 min. For each SiCw content, we prepared three samples. The cBN-hBN-SiCw composites with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 wt.% SiCw were denoted as SC0, SC5, SC10, SC15, SC20, SC25, and SC30, respectively. The surface of the sample was wet-ground with 320-, 600-, and 800-grit silicon carbide paper. The ground surfaces were further polished on a polishing machine using 3-, 1-, and 0.5-micron-sized diamond paste. The nanomaterials are cylindrical blocks (Φ 4.5 mm × 4.5 mm) after grinding and polishing.
The phase compositions of the powders and the nanocomposites were detected using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Smartlab Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), the scanning step width of 0.02°, and the rate of 1°/min, in the 2θ range from 20° to 70°. The morphology and fracture surface of nanocomposites were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Verios G4 UC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with through-lens detector (TLD), and the chemical composition was analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Ultim Extreme, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). The microstructure characterizations of the nanocomposites were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-ARM200F2, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The specimens of nanocomposites for TEM analysis were prepared by ion milling using a Ga-focused ion beam (FIB, Scios Dual beam, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. The thick plates were initially pre-cut to 5 μm by using a current of 30 nA. Final thinning to electron-transparent slices (thickness of less than 100 nm) was carried out by a FIB machine with ion beam current from 9.1, 2.5, and 0.79 to 0.19 nA. The Vickers hardness (HV) was measured by a hardness testing machine (KB-5-BVZ, Rems-Murr, Germany) under an indentation load of 9.8 N (adopted loading time = 30 s; dwell time = 15 s). The flexural strength of specimens with dimensions of 0.5 mm (width) × 1.0 mm (height) × 3.2 mm (length) was measured by the three-point bending method using a mechanical test machine (MTII/Fullman-SEMtester 2000, MTI Instruments, Inc., Albany, NY, USA) with a 2.45 mm testing span and a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The fracture toughness (KIC) was calculated by assessing the Vickers indentation cracks with a load of 9.8 N, according to the Evans equation [43]:
KIC = 0.16H·a2c−1.5
where 0.16 is the calibration constant, H is the Vickers hardness (GPa), a is the half diagonal of the indent (μm), and c is the radial crack length (μm).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a indicates the XRD patterns of cBN, SiCw, and cBN-25 wt.% SiCw mixed powders after vacuum treatment at 800 °C. The diffraction peaks detected in the XRD pattern of mixed powders at 43.314°, and 50.430°, correspond to the (111) and (200) reflections of cBN (PDF No. 35-1365), respectively. The diffraction peaks corresponding to (111) and (220) reflections of SiC (PDF No. 29-1129), are located at 35.597° and 59.977°, respectively. The weak peak at 33.6° in XRD patterns of mixed powders can be attributed to the stacking faults of (111) planes in SiC, similar to previous observations [44]. It is worth noting that no peaks of hBN (PDF No. 34-0421) were detected. Figure 1b presents the SEM images of the raw material of SiCw, and they have regular shapes and a mean diameter of ~420 nm based on the SEM images (Figure 1b). A typical SEM image shows that the cBN powders also have a uniform particle size (Figure 1c), based on which the grain size of cBN was evaluated. In order to ensure accuracy, the number of randomly selected cBN grains is more than 200. The average particle size is calculated as 592 nm. As shown in Figure 1d, SiCw is evenly dispersed in the cBN powders after grinding and mixing.
Figure 2a shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-sintered cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with different SiCw content. The phases detected by XRD are SiC, hBN, and cBN in the nanocomposites, indicating that there is a limited transformation from cBN to hBN and no reaction between cBN and SiCw. As shown in the STEM image of the SiC25 (Figure S2), a very reduced amount of hBN was observed, which was in good agreement with the results analyzed by XRD. Figure 2b shows a typical SEM image on the polished surface of the SiC25. The SiCw were broken into short rods (white area) after high-pressure sintering with unchanged morphologies. The corresponding EDS compositional maps (Figure 2c) further confirmed that the distribution of SiCw is highly uniform and the arrangement is random in the BN matrix.
The Vickers hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with various SiCw content are presented in Figure 3. Due to the formation of low-hardness hBN, the Vickers hardness of SiC0 (27.1 GPa) is lower than the value of the single cBN crystal and pure-phase polycrystalline cBN [5,6,7,8,9]. However, the fracture toughness of the nanocomposites is higher than that of the single cBN crystal (~2.8 MPa·m1/2) [7]. Previous work also confirmed the toughening effect of hBN [41,45]. As displayed in Figure 3, as the content of SiCw increases, the Vickers hardness of cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites initially increases and then reaches an inflection point. The same trend is also observed for fracture toughness. SiC is not a superhard material as with cBN, and it still has the inherent brittleness of ceramics. Thus, the excessive introduction of SiCw leads to a decrease in the Vickers hardness and fracture toughness for the SiC30. The flexural strength of the cBN-hBN nanocomposites is 486.4 MPa. With the addition of SiCw, the flexural strength of cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites increased to more than 600 MPa. Differing from the change trend of hardness and toughness, the further increase in SiCw content has no obvious effect on the flexural strength. It is worth mentioning that the as-sintered SiC25 exhibited the optimal mechanical properties with the highest hardness of 36.5 ± 0.5 GPa, highest fracture toughness of 6.2 ± 0.6 MPa·m1/2, and flexural strength of 687.4 ± 44.9 MPa.
To comprehensively evaluate the mechanical properties of cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites, the hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of cBN composites with various additives reported previously are listed in Table 1 [4,24,29,45,46,47,48,49]. As shown in Table 1, metal additives have the effect of toughening, but they cause a serious loss of hardness for cBN composites [14,46,47]. When introducing ceramic additives, the comprehensive mechanical properties of the cBN composites are obviously better than those prepared by using only metal additives [14,24,29,47,49]. The mechanical properties of cBN composites can be further improved by introducing 2D materials such as Ti3AlC2 and hBN [45,48], and 1D materials such as SiC whiskers and Al2O3 whiskers [4,24]. For cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with the simultaneous containing 1D and 2D phases, the hardness and toughness of the SiC25 reach the best-reported level while the flexural strength is obviously better than the reported values [4,24,29,45,46,47,48,49].
SEM images of fracture surfaces for the nanocomposite with different SiCw contents were shown in Figure S1. As shown in Figure S1a, the fracture mode of cBN was an intergranular fracture. The fracture mode of the BN matrix was not affected by the addition of SiCw (Figure S1b–f). In addition, for samples with different contents of SiCw, SiCw were uniformly distributed in the matrix. An SEM image of the fracture morphology of the as-sintered SiC25 is shown in Figure 4a. The fracture mode can be determined as typical intergranular fracture due to the presence of numerous individual submicron grains with regular facet shapes and intact fracture surfaces. Traces of whisker pull-out along the axial direction and whisker breakage can also be clearly observed, which results in an increase in fracture toughness and flexural strength. Such a phenomenon can be further confirmed by the SEM images of the radial crack of the Vickers indentation, as displayed in Figure 4b,c. The crack propagates a zigzag path at the nanoscale, along which many nanoscale crack-deflection and grain-bridging phenomena can be clearly observed. It is interesting to note that the radial microcrack from the indentation bypasses the SiCw arranged axially on the polishing surface but passes through the SiCw arranged radially. It is worth noting that these crack-deflection and grain-bridging phenomena can dissipate a large amount of energy, thus improving the fracture toughness.
The detailed microstructure of the as-sintered SiC25 was further investigated by TEM analysis. Figure 5a is a representative scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the as-sintered nanocomposites. Obviously, hBN with a thickness of ~30 nm is between cBN grains, which could be identified by the corresponding interplanar spacings (Figure 5b–d). The relatively low stress in the small pores after cold pressing might be responsible for the hBN appearing. After cold pressing, the small pores are in a state of low pressure as compared with the macroscopic pressure or average stress throughout the whole sample. As the sample temperature increased, atoms in the grain surface around pores would be out of the stable region of the cBN phase and transferred to the hBN phase. Therefore, hBN did not exist the same structural aspect over the whole surface at the interface (Figure 5e). As shown in Figure 5e–h, the interplanar spacings of 0.209 nm, 0.252 nm, and 0.311 nm corresponding to (111) plane of cBN, (111) plane of SiC, and (0002) plane of the hBN, show good agreement with the corresponding standard PDF cards (Table S1), respectively. The generated hBN by in situ phase transformation ensures that there is a uniform distribution of 2D materials between ceramic grains, which is a remarkable advantage over other mixing methods. The soft-phase hBN with a lamellar structure uniformly distributed among ceramic particles, on the one hand, bonds ceramic particles to promote densification; on the other hand, it absorbs energy during crack propagation, thus improving the fracture toughness and strength [35,37]. Figure 5i shows the interfacial structure between cBN and SiCw, and it can be observed that cBN and SiC form a good bonding interface, which implies that cBN and SiCw were well sintered and there is no amorphous or impurity phase between cBN and SiCw. Figure 5j, k reveals strong hBN interfacial adhesion with SiC and cBN. Strong interfacial characteristics among the three phases serve to improve the strength and toughness of the composites. Therefore, cBN-based nanocomposites with a uniform distribution of SiCw and hBN exhibit superior mechanical properties.

4. Conclusions

In summary, cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with the simultaneous introduction of 1D and 2D phases were fabricated by the high-pressure sintering of mixed cBN and SiCw. The hBN was generated in situ via the phase transition from cBN to hBN. Composites with 1D SiCw and 2D hBN phases can demonstrate superior hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength. The nanocomposite with 25 wt.% SiCw exhibited optimal comprehensive mechanical properties with Vickers hardness of 36.5 GPa, fracture toughness of 6.2 MPa·m1/2, and flexural strength of 687.4 MPa. The main toughening mechanism is believed to be a combination of hBN inter-layer sliding, SiCw pull-out, crack deflection, and crack bridging. Our work demonstrates the preparation of nanocomposites by introducing multiple phases through various means to obtain multiple beneficial effects and may provide a reference and guidance for other subsequent research on high-performance composites.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13010037/s1, Figure S1: SEM images of fracture surfaces for the nanocomposites with (a) 0 wt.% SiCw, (b) 5 wt.% SiCw, (c) 10 wt.% SiCw, (d) 15 wt.% SiCw, (e) 20 wt.% SiCw and (f) 30 wt.% SiCw. Figure S2: STEM image of the nanocomposite with 25 wt.% SiCw. The hBN is marked by the white circles. Table S1: Interplanar spacing of cBN, SiC, and hBN identified by TEM, XRD, and PDF card.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and Z.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao); methodology, L.S., Y.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao), and X.W.; validation, B.L. (Baozhong Li) and Y.W.; formal analysis, L.S. and X.W.; investigation, L.S., Y.Z., G.L. and X.Z.; resources, Y.W. and Z.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao); data curation, X.W., B.L. (Bing Liu) and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S.; writing—review and editing, M.M., Y.W. and Z.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao); visualization, G.L., B.L. (Bing Liu) and Z.Z. (Zewen Zhuge); supervision, Z.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao); project administration, M.M. and Z.Z. (Zhisheng Zhao). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52288102, 52090020, 91963203, 52202071, U20A20238, 51722209), the National Key R & D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFA0305900 and 2018YFA0703400), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (Grant No. E2022203109) and Talent research project in Hebei Province (Grant No. 2020HBQZYC003), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M691051).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding writer upon reasonable demand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ji, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, K.; Zhu, Y. Assessment of the performance of TiB2 nanoparticles doped cBN-TiN-Al-Co composites by high temperature high pressure sintering. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 233, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ji, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, K.; Zhu, Y. Effect of Y2O3 additive on properties of cBN composites with Si3N4-Al2O3-Al as binder by high temperature and high pressure sintering. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 20478–20483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ji, H.; Sun, K.; Liang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Y. Effect of Si/Ti additive on the preparation and properties of cBN-diamond composite sintered by high-temperature and high-pressure. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2019, 99, 107513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, J.; Shao, G.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, X.T.; Wang, H.L.; Zhang, R. Processing and properties of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride reinforced by SiC whisker. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sumiya, H.; Uesaka, S.; Satoh, S. Mechanical properties of high purity polycrystalline cBN synthesized by direct conversion sintering method. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Solozhenko, V.L.; Kurakevych, O.O.; Le Godec, Y. Creation of Nanostuctures by Extreme Conditions: High-Pressure Synthesis of Ultrahard Nanocrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1540–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tian, Y.J.; Xu, B.; Yu, D.L.; Ma, Y.M.; Wang, Y.B.; Jiang, Y.B.; Hu, W.T.; Tang, C.C.; Gao, Y.F.; Luo, K.; et al. Ultrahard nanotwinned cubic boron nitride. Nature 2013, 493, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, G.D.; Kou, Z.L.; Yan, X.Z.; Lei, L.; Peng, F.; Wang, Q.M.; Wang, K.X.; Wang, P.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; et al. Submicron cubic boron nitride as hard as diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 121901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, M.; Kou, Z.L.; Liu, T.; Lu, J.R.; Liu, F.M.; Liu, Y.J.; Qi, L.; Ding, W.; Gong, H.X.; Ni, X.L.; et al. Polycrystalline cubic boron nitride prepared with cubic-hexagonal boron nitride under high pressure and high temperature. Chin. Phys. B 2018, 2, 056105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xie, H.; Deng, F.M.; Yang, X.F.; Han, S.L. Study of fragmentation in cBN powders under ultra-high pressure. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1631–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Monteiro, S.N.; Skury, A.L.D.; de Azevedo, M.G.; Bobrovnitchii, G.S. Cubic boron nitride competing with diamond as a superhard engineering material-an overview. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2013, 2, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, J.F.; Tu, R.; Goto, T. Densification of SiO2-cBN composites by using Ni nanoparticle and SiO2 nanolayer coated cBN powder. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 4961–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mao, C.; Ren, Y.H.; Gan, H.Y.; Zhang, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Tang, K. Microstructure and mechanical properties of cBN-WC-Co composites used for cutting tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 76, 2043–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, S.N.; Fan, H.Z.; Su, Y.F.; Li, W.S.; Li, J.C.; Yan, B.; Song, J.J.; Hu, L.T.; Zhang, Y.S. Influence of binder systems on sintering characteristics, microstructures, and mechanical properties of PcBN composites fabricated by SPS. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Klimczyk, P.; Cura, M.E.; Vlaicu, A.M.; Mercioniu, I.; Wyzga, P.; Jaworska, L.; Hannula, S.P. Al2O3-cBN composites sintered by SPS and HPHT methods. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mikinori, H.; Takashi, G. Effect of time on microstructure and hardness of βSiAlON-cubic boron nitride composites during spark plasma sintering. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 521–524. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, X.Z.; Ma, Z.L.; Sun, X.; Yu, T.B.; Wang, W.S. Effects of ZrO2 and Y2O3 on physical and mechanical properties of ceramic bond and ceramic CBN composites. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard. Mater. 2018, 75, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yue, Z.M.; Yang, L.M.; Gong, J.H.; Gao, J. Experimental Investigation on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of cBN-Ti3SiC2 Composites. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2016, 18, 1568–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.L.; Liang, L.X.; Wang, H.L.; Zhao, P.B.; Zhao, X.T.; Shao, G.; Zhang, R. Processing and properties of PcBN composites fabricated by HPHT using PSN and Al as sintering additive. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Silvestroni, L.; Sciti, D.; Melandri, C.; Guicciardi, S. Toughened ZrB2-based ceramics through SiC whisker or SiC chopped fiber additions. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 2155–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ye, F.; Liu, L.M.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhou, Y.; Peng, B.; Meng, Q.C. Preparation and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced barium aluminosilicate glass-ceramic composites. Scripta Mater. 2006, 55, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yamamoto, G.; Omori, M.; Hashida, T.; Kimura, H. A novel structure for carbon nanotube reinforced alumina composites with improved mechanical properties. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 315708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Takahashi, K.; Yokouchi, M.; Lee, S.-K.; Ando, K. Crack-healing behavior of Al2O3 toughened by SiC whiskers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 86, 2143–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rumiantseva, Y.; Melnichuk, I.; Garashchenko, V.; Zaporozhets, O.; Turkevich, V.; Bushlya, V. Influence of cBN content, Al2O3 and Si3N4 additives and their morphology on microstructure, properties, and wear of PCBN with NbN binder. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 22230–22238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, C.; He, D.W.; Liu, C.M.; Wang, H.K.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q.M.; Wang, W.D. Preparation of ZrO2 whiskers through high pressure and high temperature method. Solid State Sci. 2015, 41, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, X.W.; Cheng, L.F.; Zhang, L.T.; Travitzky, N.; Greil, P. Fiber-reinforced multifunctional SiC matrix composite materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 2017, 62, 117–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fei, J.; Zhang, C.; Luo, D.; Cui, Y.L.; Li, H.J.; Lu, Z.Q.; Huang, J.F. Vertically aligned TiO2 nanorods-woven carbon fiber for reinforcement of both mechanical and anti-wear properties in resin composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tian, W.B.; Kan, Y.M.; Zhang, G.J.; Wang, P.L. Effect of carbon nanotubes on the properties of ZrB2-SiC ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 2008, 487, 568–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rumiantseva, Y.Y.; Bushlya, V.N.; Turkevich, V.Z. The Influence of SiC and Al2O3 Whiskers on the Properties of Whisker-Reinforced cBN-Based Composites. J. Superhard Mater. 2019, 41, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Asl, M.S.; Ahmadi, Z.; Namini, A.S.; Babapoor, A.; Motallebzadeh, A. Spark plasma sintering of TiC-SiCw ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 19808–19821. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shchegoleva, N.E.; Evdokimov, S.A.; Osin, I.V.; Chainikova, A.S.; Shavnev, A.A. High-Temperature Ceramic Composites (SiC/SiCw). Glass Ceram. 2020, 77, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, W.W.; Gui, J.Y.; Wei, S.; Xue, W.J.; Xie, Z.P. Si3N4-SiCw composites as structural materials for cryogenic application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 2667–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deng, J.; Ai, X. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Pressed TiB2-SiCw Composites. Mater. Res. Bull. 1998, 33, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, Z.; Zhong, L.; Wang, H.; Li, X. Structural Defects, Mechanical Behaviors, and Properties of Two-Dimensional Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Walker, L.S.; Marotto, V.R.; Rafiee, M.A.; Koratkar, N.; Corral, E.L. Toughening in Graphene Ceramic Composites. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3182–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, L.X.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.H.; Xu, L.; Cao, X.X.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, Z.G.; Meng, C.M.; Zhu, W.J.; Ouyang, X.P. Enhancing Toughness in Boron Carbide with Reduced Graphene Oxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 99, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kitiwan, M.; Iton, A.; Goto, T. Spark plasma sintering of TiN-TiB2-hBN composites and their properties. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 4498–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, B.; Lee, D.; Lee, J.H.; Ryu, H.J.; Hong, S.H. Enhancement of toughness and wear resistance in boron nitride nanoplatelet (BNNP) reinforced Si3N4 nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kovalčíková, A.; Balko, J.; Balázsi, C.; Hvizdoš, P.; Dusza, J. Influence of hBN content on mechanical and tribological properties of Si3N4/BN ceramic composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 3319–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.W.; Chen, J.; Xing, R.; Babapoor, A. Hot-pressing and characterization of TiB2-SiC composites with different amounts of BN additive. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 16652–16660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, J.C.; Niu, B.; Ren, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Lei, L.W.; Zhang, F. Densification and mechanical properties of boron carbide prepared via spark plasma sintering with cubic boron nitride as an additive. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, W.L.; Sun, G.X.; Chen, Y.F.; Sun, X.N.; Bi, J.Q. Preparation and mechanical properties of boron nitride nanosheets/alumina composites. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 21993–21997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Evans, A.G.; Charles, E.A. Fracture toughness determinations by indentation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1976, 59, 371–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, R.X.; Wei, X.D.; Hu, W.T.; Ying, P.; Wu, Y.J.; Wang, L.Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, M.D.; Yu, D.L.; et al. Nanocrystalline cubic silicon carbide: A route to superhardness. Small 2022, 18, 2201212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, J.K.; Wang, H.K.; Zhang, Z.C.; Hou, Z.Q.; Wu, D.Z.; Ouyang, X.P. Analysis of mechanical properties of Al2O3-cBN-hBN composites and identification of main influencing factors. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2022, 19, 3255–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yuan, Y.G.; Cheng, X.Z.; Chang, R.; Li, T.H.; Zang, J.B.; Wang, Y.H.; Yu, Y.Q.; Lu, J.; Xu, X.P. Reactive sintering cBN-Ti-Al composites by spark plasma sintering. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2016, 69, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, L.M.; Yue, Z.M.; Gong, J.H.; Zhao, X.D.; Chu, X.R. Compositions, mechanical properties and microstructures of cBN-based composites sintered with Al or TiC. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2017, 116, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, L.M.; Gong, J.H.; Yue, Z.M.; Chu, X.R. Preparation and characterization of cBN-based composites from cBN-Ti3AlC2 mixtures. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2016, 66, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kitiwan, M.; Ito, A.; Zhang, J.F.; Goto, T. Densification and mechanical properties of cBN-TiN-TiB2 composites prepared by spark plasma sintering of SiO2-coated cBN powder. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 3619–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of cBN, SiCw, and cBN-25 wt.% SiCw mixed powder after vacuum treatment. SEM images of the (b) SiCw, (c) cBN powders, and (d) cBN-25 wt.% SiCw mixed powder.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of cBN, SiCw, and cBN-25 wt.% SiCw mixed powder after vacuum treatment. SEM images of the (b) SiCw, (c) cBN powders, and (d) cBN-25 wt.% SiCw mixed powder.
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g001
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with different SiCw content. (b) SEM image of the mirror-polished nanocomposite surface for cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposite. (c) EDS mappings of the mirror-polished nanocomposite surface.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites with different SiCw content. (b) SEM image of the mirror-polished nanocomposite surface for cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposite. (c) EDS mappings of the mirror-polished nanocomposite surface.
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g003 550
Figure 3. Vickers hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites as a function of the content of SiCw.
Figure 3. Vickers hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of the cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites as a function of the content of SiCw.
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) SEM image of fracture surface for the SiC25. The whisker pull-out along axial direction is marked by the yellow circles. (b) SEM image of Vickers hardness indentation initiated by a load of 9.8 N for the SiC25. (c) High magnification of (b) indicates the presence of the crack deflection and crack bridging.
Figure 4. (a) SEM image of fracture surface for the SiC25. The whisker pull-out along axial direction is marked by the yellow circles. (b) SEM image of Vickers hardness indentation initiated by a load of 9.8 N for the SiC25. (c) High magnification of (b) indicates the presence of the crack deflection and crack bridging.
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g004
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Typical HRTEM image of cBN and hBN interface. (b–d) Magnified images of white solid box in (a). (e) Typical HRTEM image of the cBN-hBN-SiCw interfaces. (f–h) Enlarged images of the white solid box in (e). HRTEM images of (i) cBN-SiCw interface, (j) hBN-SiCw interface, and (k) cBN-hBN interface.
Figure 5. (a) Typical HRTEM image of cBN and hBN interface. (b–d) Magnified images of white solid box in (a). (e) Typical HRTEM image of the cBN-hBN-SiCw interfaces. (f–h) Enlarged images of the white solid box in (e). HRTEM images of (i) cBN-SiCw interface, (j) hBN-SiCw interface, and (k) cBN-hBN interface.
Nanomaterials 13 00037 g005
Table
Table 1. Hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites in comparison with previously reported cBN composites with various additives.
Table 1. Hardness, fracture toughness, and flexural strength of cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocomposites in comparison with previously reported cBN composites with various additives.
SampleRaw MaterialsHardness (GPa)Fracture Toughness (MPa·m1/2)Flexural Strength (MPa)Reference
cBN composites with metal
additives		95 wt.% cBN-5 wt.% Al30.23N/A455.39[47]
45 vol.% cBN-35 vol.% Ti-20 vol.% Al14.17.6 a390.7[46]
45 wt.% cBN-40 wt.% Ti-15 wt.% Al14.143.95 b194.31[14]
cBN composites with metals and
ceramics as additives		60 vol.% cBN-25 vol.% NbN-5 vol.% Al-10 vol.% Al2O4w27.55.5 cN/A[24]
50 vol.% cBN-5 vol.% Al-15 vol.% SiCw-30 vol.% TaN33.016.57 c[29]
50 vol.% cBN-5 vol.% Al-10 vol.% Al2O3w-35 vol.% TaN33.092.59 c
cBN composites with ceramic
additives		50 wt.% cBN-5 wt.% ZrO2 (3Y)-45 wt.% Al2O314.833.52 b145[14]
50 wt.% cBN-22 wt.% Si3N4-14 wt.% AlN-4 wt.% Y2O3-10 wt.% Al2O315.595.62 b465
90 wt.% cBN-10 wt.% TiC29.02N/A497.06[47]
80 wt.% cBN-20 wt.% Ti3AlC233.14N/A422.4[48]
50 vol.% cBN@SiO2-15 vol.% TiN-35 vol.% TiB217.97.3 dN/A[49]
40 vol.% cBN-10 vol.% hBN-50 vol.% Al2O321.435.83 cN/A[45]
cBN composites with ceramics and whiskers as additives85 wt.% cBN-10 wt.% Al3BC3-5 wt.% SiCw355.75 b316[4]
80 wt.% cBN-10 wt.% Al3BC3-10 wt.% SiCw385.91 b345
75 wt.% cBN-10 wt.% Al3BC3-15 wt.% SiCw38.26.31 b365
70 wt.% cBN-10 wt.% Al3BC3-20 wt.% SiCw42.76.52 b406
cBN-hBN-SiCw nanocompositesSiC2536.56.2 e687.4This work
N/A indicates “not available”. a Calculated using Solozhenko equation (simplified Evans equation) based on Vickers hardness indentation. b Measured by single-edge-notched beam method. c Calculated using Anstis equation based on Vickers hardness indentation. d Calculated using Niihara equation based on Vickers hardness indentation. e Calculated using Evans equation based on Vickers hardness indentation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, L.; Zou, Y.; Ma, M.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhuge, Z.; Liu, B.; Wu, Y.; Li, B.; et al. Synthesis of cBN-hBN-SiCw Nanocomposite with Superior Hardness, Strength, and Toughness. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010037

AMA Style

Sun L, Zou Y, Ma M, Li G, Wang X, Zhang X, Zhuge Z, Liu B, Wu Y, Li B, et al. Synthesis of cBN-hBN-SiCw Nanocomposite with Superior Hardness, Strength, and Toughness. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Lei, Yitong Zou, Mengdong Ma, Guangqian Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Xiang Zhang, Zewen Zhuge, Bing Liu, Yingju Wu, Baozhong Li, and et al. 2023. "Synthesis of cBN-hBN-SiCw Nanocomposite with Superior Hardness, Strength, and Toughness" Nanomaterials 13, no. 1: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop