Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Reactive Pathways of Competitive Reactions inside Carbon Nanotubes
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Perovskite Solar Cells by TiO2-Carbon Dot Electron Transport Film Layers
Previous Article in Journal
Size Effect of Nanoceria Blended with CIME Biodiesel on Engine Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Solar Efficiency via Incorporation of Plasmonic Gold Nanostructures in a Titanium Oxide/Eosin Y Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tailoring the Emission Behavior of WO3 Thin Films by Eu3+ Ions for Light-Emitting Applications

by
V. S. Kavitha
1,2,
V. Biju
2,
K. G. Gopchandran
1,
R. Praveena
3,
C. K. Jayasankar
4,
Wanichaya Mekprasart
5,
Kanokthip Boonyarattanakalin
5,
Wisanu Pecharapa
5,* and
V. P. Mahadevan Pillai
1,6,*
1
Department of Optoelectronics, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram 695581, India
2
Department of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram 695581, India
3
Department of Physics, Gayatri Vidhya Parishad College of Engineering (A), Visakhapatnam 530048, India
4
Department of Physics, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
5
College of Materials Innovation and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
6
Amrita School of Physical Science, Amrita VishwaVidyapeetam, Amaravathi Campus, Coimbatore 641112, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010007
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wide Band Gap Oxide Based Nanomaterials and Thin Films)

Abstract

:
The article reports the successful fabrication of Eu3+-doped WO3 thin films via the radio-frequency magnetron sputtering (RFMS) technique. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing the tunable visible emission (blue to bluish red) from a WO3:Eu3+ thin film system using RFMS. X-ray diffractograms revealed that the crystalline nature of these thin films increased upto 3 wt% of the Eu3+ concentration. The diffraction peaks in the crystalline films are matched well with the monoclinic crystalline phase of WO3, but for all the films’, micro-Raman spectra detected bands related to WO3 monoclinic phase. Vibrational and surface studies reveal the amorphous/semi-crystalline behavior of the 10 wt% Eu3+-doped sample. Valence state determination shows the trivalent state of Eu ions in doped films. In the 400–900 nm regions, the fabricated thin films show an average optical transparency of ~51–85%. Moreover, the band gap energy gradually reduces from 2.95 to 2.49 eV, with an enhancement of the Eu3+-doping content. The doped films, except the one at a higher doping concentration (10 wt%), show unique emissions of Eu3+ ions, besides the band edge emission of WO3. With an enhancement of the Eu3+ content, the concentration quenching process of the Eu3+ ions’ emission intensities is visible. The variation in CIE chromaticity coordinates suggest that the overall emission color can be altered from blue to bluish red by changing the Eu3+ ion concentration.

1. Introduction

Tungsten oxide, referred to as WO3, is a well-known n-type wide-energy band gap oxide semiconductor material that has gained much attention as a promising candidate for different applications in various fields [1]. It shows exciting novel functionalities because of its unusual electronic behavior. Generally, different nanostructures of WO3 such as nanorods, nanoparticles, nanowires, nanoplates, etc., are of great concern as a promising candidate for electrochromic applications [2,3], photocatalysis [4], gas sensors [5,6], solar cells [7], etc. The general morphology of WO3 is defect-perovskite, with the formula of ABO3. In the ABO3 structure, the ‘A’ sites are unoccupied, whereas the ‘B’ sites are occupied with ‘W’ atoms, forming a 3-D network of corner or edge-shared or a layered structure of WO6 octahedra, depending on whether they are stoichiometric WO3 or sub-stoichiometric WO3 or WO3 hydrates [1]. Thin films of WO3 have been used as gas sensors [8] and the photocatalyst [9] in photochromic devices [10] and as transparent conducting electrodes [11]. Various methods are employed to fabricate thin films of tungsten trioxide, such as hydrothermal techniques [12], solvothermal technique [13], pulsed laser deposition [1], radio-frequency magnetron sputtering [8], electrodeposition [14], atomic layer deposition [15], etc. In this study, Eu2O3-embedded WO3 films are synthesized using radio-frequency magnetron sputtering (RFMS), since it is a very simple technique, so by using this technique high-quality homogeneous films can be deposited.
Rare earth (RE)-based luminescence systems have gained considerable attraction due to their significant use in various technological fields. It is a well-established fact that the emission behavior of RE ions is greatly influenced by the surrounding environment of the host. Among RE elements, europium has a particular interest as a dopant, since it exhibits the property called valence fluctuation, i.e., it displays two valence states: +2 or +3. Depending on the valency, europium ions show different characteristic emissions [16]. Eu3+ ions exhibit an intense red emission via intra-4f transition, while Eu2+ ions present a broad range of emissions in the red to UV region due to 5d–4f transitions, which are influenced by the surrounding host matrix [16]. In europium-ion-doped host lattices, the intensity of emission peaks and their positions have a strong relationship with their morphology, grain size distribution and chemical composition, etc. [17]. In the present work, europium-embedded thin WO3 films are deposited using RF-magnetron sputtering, and their various properties are analyzed by adopting different characterization techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

The targets for sputtering were synthesized from WO3 and europium oxide (Eu2O3) (purity ~99.99%-Aldrich). Tungsten oxide powder was mixed with some selected contents (i.e., 0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 and 10.0 wt%) of Eu2O3 powder, then the mixture was ground, and a fine powder was obtained, which was taken as the target for film coating. Films were coated on amorphous quartz plate fixed at 50 mm distance w.r.t. target material. The details of film preparation have already been explained in our previously published work [18]. The sputter-coated films were then annealed at 600 °C (1 h). The annealed films, with different Eu2O3 contents, viz. 0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 and 10.0 wt%, are marked as WEu0, WEu1, WEu3, WEu5 and WEu10, respectively.
Structural studies and phase identification of the un-doped and Eu2O3-doped WO3 films were analyzed by studying the X-ray diffractograms, recorded with XPERT PRO X-ray diffractometer (Bruker). By employing Bragg–Brentano geometry, X-ray diffractograms were measured in 10–70° range (with an increment of ~0.0203° and scan speed ~2°/min) using CuKα radiation of wavelength, λ = 1.5406 Å. Raman spectroscopic studies were done using Labram-HR800 micro-Raman spectrometer (HORIBA JobinYvon) fitted with an Ar-ion (λ = 514.5 nm) laser. Nova NanoSEM 450 (Field Emission) SEM was employed to analyze the topography of the prepared films. Moreover, atomic force microscopic (AFM) images were used to study the geometry of the synthesized thin films using Bruker Dimension Edge (Scan Asyst) atomic force microscope. Constituent elements in the fabricated thin films were analyzed using AMETEK EDAX Octane series attached to the Carl Zeiss EVO 18 scanning electron microscope. The ionized states of the respective elements were probed by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi) measurements. VeecoDektak 6M profilometer was employed to determine the films thickness. Transmittance and absorbance studies were analyzed using JASCO V-550 UV–VIS double-beam spectrophotometer with a spectral resolution of ~1 nm. The emission behavior of the films was studied using FLS980 spectrofluorometer (Edinburgh) provided with a 450 W xenon lamp (continuous).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

The structural identification as well as the variation in the crystalline nature of the WO3 films with a change in Eu3+-doping concentrations are analyzed using the X-ray diffraction technique. Figure 1a–e presents the X-ray diffraction profiles of the Eu3+-doped WO3 thin films annealed at 600 °C. It is clear that all the films, except the WEu10 film, show a poly-crystalline structure and present the typical X-ray diffraction pattern of the monoclinic crystalline phase (ICDD Card No. 83–0951), while the XRD pattern of the WEu10 film does not present any XRD peaks, indicating its amorphous nature. In the diffraction patterns, peaks related to the dopant impurity are not detected at all. This result demonstrates that the dopant atoms are well-diffused without any segregation of the Eu2O3 phase in the deposited films. For all crystalline films, the XRD patterns show an a-axis orientation along the (h00) crystal plane despite, the added dopant, because of the reduced surface free energy quantity [19]. This strong orientation of the film along a selected crystal plane can be described using the model given by Van der Drift (“survival of the fastest” model) [20,21]. In this model, Van der Drift explained that at the initial film growth stage, nucleation takes place at different orientations, and these nuclei compete to enlarge in size. However, at the final stage of film growth, a nucleus having a larger growth rate exists, so the film will be oriented in that particular direction. From Figure 1f, it can be seen that the intensity of the peak along the (h00) crystal plane is enhanced by the increase in Eu3+-doping content up to 3 wt%; beyond that, the intensity reduces, and, finally, the film became amorphous at higher Eu3+ level (at 10 wt%). At low doping concentrations, the growth of the film along the a-axis can be attributed to the development of additional growth centers in the presence of Eu3+ ions, which may reduce the nucleation energy barrier [19,21].
Regarding the XRD peak, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) intensity for the intense (200) peak was estimated for the crystalline films, and the variation of the FWHM of the (200) peak with Eu3+ doping content is presented in Figure 1f and Table 1. The FWHM value for the (200) peak of pure film was found to be 0.2148°. With an increase in Eu3+-doping concentration, the FWHM decreases up to 3 wt% of Eu3+ concentration, and, after that, it increases. Out of the prepared films, the WEu3 film exhibits a low FWHM, indicating its superior crystalline quality among the films. From this observation, it can be established that moderate doping of the Eu3+ ions in the WO3 lattice enhances their crystalline nature, while a high concentration of Eu3+ ions decreases the crystalline behavior. The reason behind this reduction in crystallinity at a higher doping concentration can be understood from the following facts: (i) at a higher impurity concentration, the impurity atoms may segregate along the inter-particle boundary regions [22]; (ii) the addition of newer growth centers may become abstained at a higher impurity concentration [23]; (iii) the crystal reorientation effects become predominant at higher Eu3+ concentrations [24]. These factors can considerably reduce the crystalline quality of WO3 thin films with more Eu3+ contents. The mean crystallites size ( D h k l ) in the crystalline films is calculated from the ( 2 θ h k l ) position and broadening ( β h k l , FWHM) of the most intense peak using the Scherrer formula (Equation (S1), additional information) [25]. The evaluated quantities of ( D h k l ) are shown in Table 1, which is in the range of 30–73 nm. For the pure film, the size of the mean crystallites is around 38 nm. In the lightly Eu3+-doped WO3 films, i.e., for WEu1 and WEu3 films, the mean crystallites size is 70 and 73 nm, respectively, whereas, in the WEu5 film, the average crystallites size reduces to 30 nm. This crystallite-size reduction in higher Eu3+-doped WO3 films may be because of the accumulation of the dopant atoms along the grain boundary region, which will produce a hindering force. When the hindering force exceeds the driving force for the grain growth, the movement of the grain boundary is curbed and, therefore, reduces the average size of crystallite [26].
The center of the (200) peak shows a systematic shift towards the lower angle side with the enhancement in Eu3+-doping concentration, and the observed change in the peak position is shown in Figure 2a. This regular variation in the 2θ value may be because of the longer ionic radius of the incorporated Eu3+ (~0.94 Å) [27] compared to the W6+ host ions (~0.65 Å) [28]. According to Vegard’s law [29], the incorporation of the impurity ions of the longer ionic radii into a lattice of the shorter ionic radii will expand the lattice due to substitutional incorporation, and, hence, the diffraction patterns will move to lower diffraction angles (2θ). The inter-planar distance of the (200) plane ( d 200 ) is also calculated using Bragg’s relation, which is shown in Figure 2b and in Table 1. It is clear that the value of d 200 increases with a rise in Eu3+-doping concentrations. This variation of the most intense peak location towards a lower angle side and the marked increase in the value of d 200 indicate the WO3 lattice expansion, due to the presence of impurity ions. This expansion of the host lattice will produce stress in the thin films, which may arise due to different factors. The presence of defects and distortion and also the deviation in the ionic size of the host and impurity ions produce intrinsic stress in the deposited films. The disparity in the lattice constants and thermal expansion coefficients between the fabricated film and quartz substrate create extrinsic stress [30]. In the present study, due to the amorphous behavior of the quartz substrate, it is difficult to estimate the extrinsic stress that originated because of the lattice mismatch between the quartz substrate and thin film [31]. However, it was reported that this type of extrinsic stress might relax upon the nucleation of the particles, followed by a 3D structure formation on the 2D surface [32]. The role of temperature-dependent extrinsic stress can also be neglected when the film thickness is large [33]. In the present study, film’s thickness is determined with the help of stylus profilometry, which is in the region of 134–301 nm, as shown in Table 2; therefore, the effect due to thermal stress can be neglected. Hence, the stress in the thin films has a major role from the intrinsic portion, and this is mainly due to the ionic size variation between the added impurity and host ions. Moreover, the film-deposition conditions and the film’s surface topography have a unique role in the formation of stress.
The strain in the fabricated thin films is evaluated by the value of θ h k l and β h k l for Bragg’s intense reflection plane, with the help of Equation (S2) (supporting information) [25]. Table 1 gives the determined quantities of the lattice strain. The dislocation density ( δ ) , which is the length of the dislocation lines/unit volume, can be determined using Equation (S3) (supporting details) [34]. The estimated values of ‘ δ ’ are also shown in Table 1. It is clear that with the rise in Eu3+-doping concentrations, the dislocation density first decreases up to 3 wt% of Eu3+ level, and thereafter its value increases. This shows that the WEu3 film possesses the best crystalline property among the synthesized films [35].
Figure 3a–e show the micro-Raman spectra of the pure and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films measured (100–1100 cm−1) with an argon-ion laser (514.5 nm excitation). The literature shows that the phase of WO3 can be successfully identified using Raman spectroscopy [36,37]. The spectrum of each sample shown in the figure can be categorized into three fundamental vibrational groups. The stretching vibrational modes can be noticed in the 900–600 cm−1 range; the bending vibrational modes can be noticed in the 500–200 cm−1 range; and the lattice vibrational modes can be noticed in the wavenumber region below 200 cm−1 [38]. The spectra show a large number of vibrational modes, especially in the low wavenumber domain, which suggests a lowering of the symmetry and an enhanced number of molecules per unit cells [39]. The structure of WO3 is reported as distorted ReO3, and it contains corner-shared, distorted WO6 octahedra [40]. Group theory studies for an ideal ReO3 geometry (space group: O h 1 ) reveal only two active Raman bands, but, in the present analysis, a higher number of active bands are detected in the spectra, probably because of the lowering of the symmetry and the distortion in the octahedra in the real monoclinic structure [37]. The Raman bands detected around 273, 322, 700 and 804 cm−1 are the characteristic Raman bands of the monoclinic WO3 phase, supporting the information obtained from XRD [41,42]. The intense band detected at 804 cm−1 is because of the symmetric stretching mode of O-W-O bonds, while those detected around 700 cm−1 are because of their asymmetric stretching vibrations. In higher Eu3+-embedded films, the symmetric stretching-mode position is observed at a lower wavenumber side compared to that in lightly doped films. The bands around 273 and 325 cm−1 can be attributed to the symmetric bending vibrations of the O-W-O bonds, while those between the 370 and 495 cm−1 regions can be ascribed to the asymmetric bending modes of the same bonds [36]. The FWHM (around ~804 cm−1) of the symmetric stretching vibrational mode is an indication of the structural disorder in terms of the bond length and angle of the W-O-W bond [43]. For the un-doped film, the FWHM value for this mode is around 34.148 cm−1. Upon increasing the Eu3+-doping concentration, the FWHM value first decreases up to 3 wt%, and thereafter it increases. The variation of the FWHM for the Eu3+-doping concentration is shown in Figure 3f. Out of the prepared films, the WEu3 film exhibits the lowest quantity (~21.945 cm−1) for FWHM, while theWEu10 film shows the highest value (~73.626 cm−1). This result is consistent with the XRD analysis: the crystalline quality enhances with an increase in Eu3+ content up to 3 wt%, and, after that, the crystalline quality deteriorates with an increase in Eu3+ content. The vibrational band noticed at 990 cm−1 in all the films could be assigned to the W6+=O stretching vibrations of the bridging oxygen, which may exist due to clusters and void structures present on the film surface [44].
In the spectrum of the WEu10 film, the integrated intensity of the bands, except for the one around 990 cm−1, reduces considerably compared to the other films. The increase in the Raman band intensity corresponds to the W6+=O stretching vibration points that this film may contain species other than the crystalline WO3 phase, i.e., the sub-stoichiometric WO3 phase [45]. Even though the X-ray diffractogram of the WEu10 film is devoid of the characteristic XRD peaks, its Raman spectrum shows noticeable Raman bands that correspond to the WO3 monoclinic phase, which may be due to the semi-crystalline trend of the WEu10 film. This result points to the conclusion that Raman spectroscopy is a powerful technique to analyze the phase of semi-crystalline materials where XRD fails.

3.2. Morphological and Composition Analysis

Figure 4 presents the FESEM images of the pure and Eu3+-embedded WO3 thin films. The WEu0 film exhibits a smooth surface morphology, but, for the WEu1 film, a thick systematic distribution of the similarly sized smaller grains can be clearly noticed. The surface morphology of the WEu3 film presents a random distribution of the isolated bigger grains. It is also clear that these grains have a tendency to coalesce together to form bigger grains. The WEu5 film also exhibits almost the same surface morphology as the WEu3 film, but the grains are fewer in number and larger in size. An entirely different morphology can be observed in the WEu10 film. The film reveals a smooth surface with clusters of smaller grains distributed randomly over the surface. This surface morphology supports the amorphous/semi-crystalline nature of the WEu10 film, revealed by XRD and micro-Raman analysis.
The 3D AFM morphologies of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films are presented in Figure 5a–e. As seen from the morphology, the AFM images of the films also present a similar surface morphology as that of the FESEM images. The AFM micrograph of the un-doped film exhibits a smooth surface, but for the 1 wt% Eu3+-doped film, a thick distribution of smaller grains (uniform sizes) having well-defined boundaries can be observed. In the WEu3 film, a random distribution of bigger grains having clear grain boundaries can be observed. In the WEu5 film, the agglomerated bigger grains can be seen, which are much lower in number and distributed here and there on the film surface; in the WEu10 film, a smooth surface morphology can be observed. The root mean square (RMS) surface roughness of the fabricated films is calculated by WSxM 5.0 Develop 6.3 software [46] and is shown in Table 2 and Figure 5f. Among the prepared thin films, the WEu3 and WEu5 films show higher magnitudes of RMS surface roughness. Moreover, the WEu10 film presents the lowest value for RMS surface roughness among the doped films. It is quite interesting to observe that the grain size from the XRD analysis and morphology images (i.e., FESEM and AFM) differ greatly. This is because, in the XRD measurement, the size of the scattering domain is determined as the grain size (or crystallite size), but, in the morphology analysis, the surface morphology of agglomerated grains is measured, which mostly depends on the instrument’s resolution. Hence, it can be understood that an average grain observed in the morphology images carries other smaller crystallites that have individual orientations, which are detected using XRD [47].
To analyze the constituent elements in the synthesized thin films, the EDX spectra are taken. Figure 6 presents the EDX spectra of the pure and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 films. For the spectrum of the un-doped film, we can only see the peaks related to ‘O’, ‘W’ and ‘Si’, but, for the 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded film, in addition to these peaks, the ‘Eu’ peaks can be clearly seen. The presence of the ‘Eu’ peaks in the embedded film indicates the presence of dopant atoms in the host lattice. The detected ‘Si’ peak originates from the quartz substrate used in the present study. It is important to note that in the EDX spectra of the films, we can observe an enhancement in intensity corresponding to the ‘W’ peak. This enhancement in the ‘W’ peak may be because of the overlap of the X-ray signals from the ‘W’ atom that is present in the deposited films with that of the emission from the ‘Si’ atom present in the quartz substrate [48]. The two-dimensional distribution of the different elements in the WEu5 film is given in Figure 7, and the mapping image confirms the incorporation of Eu3+ in the WO3 lattice.
The XPS measurement analyzed the constituent elements and their respective oxidation states in the deposited films. The survey scan of the un-doped WO3 film (WEu0) (Figure 8a) presented peaks due to the ‘O’, ‘W’ and ‘C’ elements, but, for the Eu3+-embedded WO3 film (WEu3) (Figure 8b), the survey spectrum showed additional peaks corresponding to the ‘Eu’ element. The C1s peak observed at 284.98 eV might be because of the presence of the carbon impurity found on the surface of the film upon exposure to the surrounding atmosphere [49]. Figure 9a and 9c, respectively, present the high-resolution XPS spectral profile of the WEu0 and WEu3 films in the W4f and W5p regions, along with their de-convoluted curves. In both the spectra, the 4f region contains a doublet, and the 5p region contains a singlet, corresponding to the ‘W’ atom. The doublet peaks in the 4f region of the WEu0 film are detected around 35.61 (4f7/2) and 37.59 eV (4f5/2), while, for the WEu3 film, these peaks are observed around 35.71 (4f7/2) and 37.69 eV (4f5/2). The singlet peak in the 5p region of the WEu0 film is observed around 41.34 eV, and, for the WEu3 film, it is observed around 41.28 eV. The binding energy (BE) values of the W4f5/2 and W4f7/2 peaks in these spectra show the +6 valence state of the ‘W’ atom in WO3 [50].
The O1s peaks of these films (WEu0 and WEu3) are presented in Figure 9b and 9d, respectively. The asymmetric peak observed in both the spectra can be de-convoluted into two symmetric peaks; one at a low binding energy position, and the other at a high binding energy position. The peak observed at the low binding energy position (530.29 eV for WEu0 and 530.19 eV for WEu3) can be assigned to the O2- ions bonded to the W6+ ions, and the peak observed at the high binding energy position (532.11 eV for WEu0 and 531.93 eV for WEu3) can be attributed to the adsorbed oxygen atoms on the film’s surface [51]. Figure 9e presents the high-resolution XPS spectrum of the Eu3d core energy level in the WEu3 film and its fitted curves. The spectrum presents two prominent peaks at 1135.10 and 1164.51 eV, which can be, respectively, attributed to the 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 spin-orbit splitting for the Eu3+ state [52]. Hence, it is quite evident that the dopant Eu exists primarily in the +3 states in the embedded films.

3.3. Optical Analysis

The absorbance and transmittance spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films in the 200–900 nm region are given in Figure 10a and 10b, respectively. The transmittance of thin films mainly depends on a variety of parameters including crystalline quality, surface smoothness, thickness, porosity, etc. An increase in crystalline quality usually increases the optical transparency. In contrast, an increase in porosity, surface roughness and thickness decreases the optical transparency [53]. The prepared thin films show an average transmittance of ~51–85% in the 400–900 nm wavelength regions (Table 2). Among the prepared thin films, the WEu3 and WEu5 films exhibit lower values of optical transparency in the measured wavelength regions. Structural analysis shows an increased crystalline quality for the WEu3 film relative to the others; at the same time, this film has larger values for thickness and RMS roughness. This increased film thickness and surface roughness of the WEu3 film may be the reason for its reduced optical transmittance. However, for the WEu5 film, a reduction in crystallinity and increases in roughness and thickness have been observed. These reasons may be accounted for the reduced optical transparency of the WEu5 film. Moreover, the WEu10 film with the least crystalline quality may indicate that it possesses the lowest optical transparency among all the films, but, on the other hand, a good optical transparency has been noticed for this film. The reduced RMS surface roughness and film thickness showed by the WEu10 film may be the reason for its good optical transmittance.
The natures of the energy gap and optical transition of the prepared thin films are analyzed using the relation of photon energy ( h ν ) and absorption coefficient ‘α’ using Equation (S4) (supporting information) [54]. In the present case, the α 1 2 vs. h ν plots (Figure 11a) show a linear nature, suggesting an indirect transition behavior for the deposited films. Table 2 shows the calculated quantities of the band gap energies. The variation of band gap energy with respect to the Eu3+-doping content is shown in Figure 11b. The band gap energy of the films is in the range of 2.49–2.95 eV. The un-doped WO3 film shows an energy gap of around 2.95 eV, but, for the Eu3+-doped films, the band gap energy gradually decreases with an increase in the doping content. The energy gap of a material depends on various factors such as defects, disorders, carrier concentration, strain, etc. [55,56]. For different RE-embedded CdO films, a red shift in the band gap energy was reported by Dakhel [57,58,59,60,61]. Dakhel suggested that the sudden increase in carrier concentration may be the possible reason for the decrease in the band gap energy with an increase in doping concentration, though this result is not in agreement with the expected band gap expansion because of the Burstein–Moss effect [62]. In semiconductors, the enhancement in carrier concentration produces two different effects, i.e., band gap shrinkage and band gap expansion.
The decrease in the energy gap may be due to the variation in the strength and nature of the crystalline potential by the incorporation of RE ions, which include the effect of their 4f shell valence electrons on the crystalline electronic energy levels [58]. Moreover, the increase in doping content increases the number of cations, which may enhance the localization of electrons that changes (increases) the concentration of the donor centers. This enhancement in donor concentration level effectively reduces the optical band gap [63]. The observed strain in thin films can also change the energy gap [64,65]: a compression strain increases the energy gap because of the compressed lattice, while a tensile strain reduces the energy gap due to the elongated lattice [55,64,65]. Structural analysis from the XRD measurement reveals an enhancement in the tensile strain because of the higher ionic radius of dopant (Eu3+) ions, and this increase in the tensile strain also decreases the band gap energy. For the WEu5 and WEu10 films, a reduction in crystalline quality is observed from the XRD and micro-Raman analysis. This reduction in crystallinity may produce oxygen vacancy sites, which may shrink the energy gap at a higher Eu3+ concentration due to the creation of deep localized states [48,66]. After all, the many body effects on the valence and conduction band reduce the width of the forbidden energy gap due to impurity scattering and electron interaction. Due to many body effects, the impurity levels merges with the up-lying conduction band and thus decreases the band gap energy [67].
The PL emission spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films measured using 360 nm excitation are shown in Figure 12a. A few reports are available related to the emission properties of the Eu3+ doped WO3 film, but there are no reports analyzing the emission property of an RFM-sputtered WO3:Eu3+ thin film system. Luo et al. [68] reported an enhanced electrochromic switching behavior and a tunable red emission in response to an external bias from the Eu - doped WO3 films deposited via the hydrothermal process. Shen et al. [69] studied the effect of pH on the luminescent and electrochromic properties of an Eu-doped WO3 film prepared using the hydrothermal method and found that these properties could be changed by altering the pH value. Usually, for WO3, a wide emission spanning from NUV to the VIS spectral region (~390–500 nm) is reported, which relates to the indirect band to band transition in WO3 [70,71,72]. In the present work, un-doped WO3 film presents a wide emission peak in the 390–500 nm regions, because of the band-to-band transition in WO3. For Eu3+-doped films (except the WEu10 film), besides the band-to-band emission, emission peaks centered around 466, 537, 586, 614 and 686 nm regions are also observed. These peaks can, respectively, be assigned to the 5D27F0, 5D17F1, 5D07F1, →7F2 and →7F4 transitions in the europium ions having a valency of +3 (i.e., Eu3+) [73,74]. The emission around 614 nm (5D07F2) is a hypersensitive electric-dipole (ED) transition, and its intensity is highly affected by the surrounding crystal-field of Eu3+ ions. The radiative de-excitation due to 5D07F1 (586 nm) transition is a magnetic-dipole (MD) transition, which is independent of the surrounding crystal-field effect of the Eu3+ ions [75,76,77,78]. The intensity ratio of ED to MD transitions is commonly taken to analyze the chemical microenvironment of the Eu3+ ions in a given host [68]. Usually, the ED transition intensity becomes prominent in the PL spectra when the Eu3+ ions are situated at low symmetry sites having no inversion center. A strong red emission (~614 nm) in the WO3:Eu system reveals that Eu3+ occupies the non-inversion low symmetry centers in the WO3 host environment [74]. When the Eu3+ ion replaces W6+, the charge compensation will produce two types of defects: interstitial Eu3+ and oxygen vacancies. These defects may create symmetry distortion in the surrounding environment of Eu3+. Moreover, the disparity in the ionic radii of Eu3+ and W6+ produces a symmetry distortion in the surrounding host environment of Eu3+. This distortion in the local environment symmetry of the Eu3+ ions may enhance the ~614 nm emission intensity in the PL spectra of Eu3+-embedded WO3 films [79].
An enhancement in the emission intensity attributed to the band-to-band transition is observed with an enhancement in the Eu3+ content up to 3 wt%; after that, the intensity reduces with an enhancement in the Eu3+ content. This enhancement in excitonic emission intensity may be because of the enhanced crystalline quality of the films, up to 3 wt% of the Eu3+ content; beyond that, the decrease in the crystalline property of the films leads to a reduction in the emission intensity of the excitonic transition [18]. Moreover, the superposition of the characteristic emissions of europium ions with that of the band edge emission may also contribute to an increased excitonic emission intensity, up to 3 wt% of the Eu3+ion concentration in the doped films. Moreover, the overall enhancement in the emission intensities of the films, upto 3 wt% of the Eu3+ concentration, can also be related to the roughness values of the films. Usually, a film having a high surface roughness shows an enhanced emission intensity, which can be correlated to the extraction of a strong emission due to the increased light scattering from the walls of the crystallites. In this report, the high value of RMS roughness and the improved emission property shown by the WEu3 films may be because of the increased number of grains in them (Figure 4). The PL emission intensities of the films are in accordance with the values of RMS roughness.
It is also observed that the characteristic emission intensity of the europium ions decreases beyond 3 wt% of the Eu3+ concentration. This reduction in the characteristic emission intensity of the Eu3+ ions may be due to the well-known concentration quenching effect, because of the cross-relaxation occurring between neighboring Eu3+ ions [74]. At a low concentration of europium ions, the mutual interaction between neighboring Eu3+ ions can be neglected, but, at a higher concentration of dopant ions, the interaction between neighboring ions increases. Due to this mutual interaction, the energy of activated Eu3+ ions can be easily transferred to quenching centers to be released as non-radiative energy, which may result in the quenching of the characteristic emission intensity of the Eu3+ ions at higher Eu3+ ion concentrations [68]. It is very interesting to observe that the overall emission intensity for the WEu10 film is very much reduced compared to all other Eu3+-doped films. This observed reduction in the total emission intensity of the WEu10 film may be attributed to its amorphous/semi-crystalline nature, reduced film thickness and the enhanced concentration quenching effect, due to the high concentration of Eu3+ ions. The CIE-1931 chromaticity diagram is plotted to study the emission-color perception of the synthesized thin films [80] and is shown in Figure 12b. The estimated quantities of the CIE co-ordinates (x, y) are also shown in Table 2. As seen from Table 2 and Figure 12b, the color can be tuned from blue to bluish red by changing the Eu3+ ion concentration [81]. Moreover, both the WEu3 and WEu5 films exhibit more or less similar bluish-red color coordinates, whereas the WEu10 film generates close to a blue color region. For a higher europium ion concentration (WEu10), the host emission dominates, but the active ion emission has been reduced due to the high concentration quenching of the Eu3+ ions.

4. Conclusions

Eu3+-doped WO3 thin films are successfully deposited through the RF-magnetron sputtering method. An XRD study reveals that the crystalline property of the films is enhanced with an enhancement in the Eu3+ doping content up to 3 wt%; beyond that, a considerable reduction in crystallinity is observed. At a higher Eu3+ concentration (10 wt%), the XRD pattern reveals an amorphous nature. The XRD peaks in the crystalline films are indexed to the monoclinic crystal geometry of the WO3. The micro-Raman spectra of all the films show vibrational bands corresponding to the monoclinic crystal geometry of WO3. Even though the XRD pattern of the 10 wt% Eu3+-doped WO3 film is devoid of the characteristic XRD peaks, noticeable vibrational bands of monoclinic WO3 phase are observed in its Raman spectrum, indicating its semi-crystalline nature. The tendency of smaller grains to coalesce together to form bigger ones at a higher Eu3+-doping concentration can be observed from the analysis of the surface morphology of the films using FESEM and AFM micrographs. The EDX and XPS analyses indicate the incorporation of Eu3+ in the WO3 lattice. XPS analysis confirms the +3 oxidation state of the Eu in the doped samples. Optical study shows that the prepared thin films possess an average transmittance of ~51–85% in the 400–900 nm range. The band gap energy shows a reduction from 2.95 to 2.49 eV with an enhancement in the Eu3+ doping concentration. In addition to the band edge emission of WO3, the doped films (except the 10 wt% Eu3+-doped WO3 film) exhibit the characteristic emissions of the Eu3+ ions, due to the 4f intra configuration transitions in the Eu3+ ions. The reduction in the intensity of the characteristic emissions at a higher Eu3+-doping concentration can be ascribed to the concentration quenching effect, due to the cross-relaxation between neighboring europium ions. The CIE-1931 plot shows that the emission spectral range can be turned from blue to bluish red by changing the Eu3+ ion content.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13010007/s1. Equations (S1)–(S4).

Author Contributions

Methodology: V.S.K., V.P.M.P. and R.P.; software: W.M., K.B. and W.P.; validation: W.P. and C.K.J.; formal analysis: V.S.K. and R.P.; investigation: V.S.K. and K.G.G.; resources: W.M. and K.B.; data curation: W.M. and K.B.; writing—original draft preparation: V.S.K., V.P.M.P., V.B. and C.K.J.; writing—review and editing: V.P.M.P., V.B. and K.G.G.; visualization: V.S.K. and V.B.; supervision, project administration and funding acquisition: V.P.M.P., W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to deeply thank the Department of Optoelectronics and Department of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Kerala, for the facilities and analytical instruments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lethy, K.J.; Beena, D.; Pillai, V.P.M.; Ganesan, V. Bandgap renormalization in titania modified nanostructured tungsten oxide thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition technique for solar cell applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 033515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shim, H.S.; Kim, J.W.; Sung, Y.E.; Kim, W.B. Electrochromic properties of tungsten oxide nanowires fabricated by electrospinning method. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 2062–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoo, S.J.; Jung, Y.H.; Lim, J.W.; Choi, H.G.; Kim, D.K.; Sung, Y.E. Electrochromic properties of one-dimensional tungsten oxide nanobundles. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2008, 92, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, F.; Valentin, C.D.; Pacchioni, G. Rational band gap engineering of WO3 photocatalyst for visible light water splitting. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2012, 4, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.L.; Lou, T.J.; Sun, X.M.; Li, Y.D. Highly sensitive WO3 hollow-sphere gas sensors. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 5442–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Solis, J.L.; Saukko, S.; Kish, L.; Granqvist, C.G.; Lantto, V. Semiconductor gas sensors based on nanostructured tungsten oxide. Thin Solid Film. 2001, 39, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheng, H.; Tachibana, Y.; Zadeh, K.K. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on WO3. Langumuir 2010, 26, 19148–19152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bose, R.J.; Illyasukutty, N.; Tan, K.S.; Rawat, R.S.; Matham, M.V.; Kohler, H.; Pillai, V.P.M. Preparation and characterization of Pt loaded WO3 films suitable for gas sensing applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baeck, S.H.; Choi, K.S.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Stucky, G.D.; McFarland, E.W. Enhancement of photocatalytic and electrochromic properties of electrochemically fabricated mesoporous WO3 thin films. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bechinger, C.; Wirth, C.; Leiderer, P. Photochromic coloration of WO3 with visible light. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 2834–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ponce, A. Advanced Electron Microscopy and Nanomaterials; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Wollerau, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiao, Z.; Wang, J.; Ke, L.; Sun, X.W.; Demir, H.V. Morphology-tailored synthesis of tungsten trioxide (Hydrate) thin films and their photocatalytic properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Su, J.; Feng, X.; Sloppy, J.D.; Guo, L.; Grimes, C.A. Vertically aligned WO3 nanowire arrays grown directly on transparent conducting oxide coated glass: Synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Poongodi, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Mangalaraj, D.; Ponpandian, N.; Meena, P.; Masuda, Y.; Lee, C. Electrodeposition of WO3 nanostructured thin films for electrochromic and H2S gas sensor applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 719, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, R.; Lin, Y.; Chou, L.Y.; Sheehan, S.W.; He, W.; Zhang, F.; Hou, H.J.; Wang, D. Water splitting by tungsten oxide prepared by atomic layer deposition and decorated with an oxygen-evolving catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Suresh, K.; Rao, N.V.P.; Murthy, K.V.R. Photoluminescent properties of Sr2CeO4: Eu3+ and Sr2CeO4: Eu2+ phosphors suitable for near ultraviolet excitation. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2014, 37, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niraula, B.B.; Rizal, C. Photoluminescence property of Eu3+ doped CaSiO3nano-phosphor with controlled grain size. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kavitha, V.S.; Suresh, S.; Chalana, S.R.; Pillai, V.P.M. Luminescent Ta doped WO3 thin films as a probable candidate for excitonic solar cell applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 466, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, G.; Zhu, X.; Tang, X.; Song, W.; Yang, Z.; Dai, J.; Sun, Y.; Pan, X.; Dai, S. Doping and annealing effects on ZnO:Cd thin films by sol-gel method. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 4816–4823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Van der Drift, A. Evolutionary selection, a principle governing growth orientation in vapour-deposited layers. Philips Res. Rep. 1967, 22, 267–288. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oztas, M.; Bedir, M. Thickness dependence of structural, electrical and optical properties of sprayed ZnO:Cu films. Thin Solid Film. 2008, 516, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yamauchi, S.; Handa, H.; Nagayama, A.; Hariu, T. Low temperature epitaxial growth of ZnO layer by plasma-assisted epitaxy. Thin Solid Film. 1999, 345, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, G.; Zhu, X.; Lei, H.; Song, W.; Yang, Z.; Dai, J.; Sun, Y.; Pan, X.; Dai, S. Study on chemical solution deposition of aluminum-doped zinc oxide films. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 505, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pal, M.; Pal, U.; Jimenez, J.M.G.Y.; Rodriguez, F.P. Effects of crystallization and dopant concentration on the emission behaviour of TiO2:Eunanophosphors. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cullity, B.D. Elements of X-ray Diffraction; Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1956. [Google Scholar]
  26. Neogi, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Banerjee, A.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Sarkar, A.; Kumar, R. Effect of 50 MeV Li3+ irradiation on structural and electrical properties of Mn doped ZnO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2011, 23, 205801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mohanty, P.; Kim, B.; Park, J. Synthesis of single crystalline europium-doped ZnO nanowires. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 138, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, X.F.; Leng, W.H.; Liu, D.P.; Zhang, J.Q.; Cao, C.N. Enhanced photoelectrocatalytic performance of Zn-doped WO3 photocatalysts for nitrite ions degradation under visible light. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 1976–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Epurescu, G.; Birjega, R.; Galca, A.C. Tailoring the optical properties of MgxZn1-xO thin films by nitrogen doping. Appl. Phys. A 2011, 104, 889–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rao, T.P.; Kumar, M.C.S.; Safarulla, A.; Ganesan, V.; Barman, S.R.; Sanjeeviraja, C. Physical properties of ZnO thin films deposited at various substrate temperatures using spray pyrolysis. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2010, 405, 2226–2231. [Google Scholar]
  31. Illyaskutty, N.; Sreedhar, S.; Kohler, H.; Philip, R.; Rajan, V.K.; Pillai, V.P.M. ZnO modified MoO3nano-rods, -wires, -belts and -tubes: Photophysical and nonlinear optical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 7818–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Washburn, J. Structural transition in large-lattice-mismatch heteroepitaxy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 4046–4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cebulla, R.; Wendt, R.; Ellmer, K. Al-doped zinc oxide films deposited by simultaneous RF and DC excitation of a magnetron plasma: Relationships between plasma parameters and structural and electrical film properties. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Williamson, G.K.; Smallman, R.E. Dislocation densities in some annealed and cold-worked metals from measurements on the X-ray debye-scherrer spectrum. Phil. Mag. 1956, 11, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Caglar, Y.; Aksoy, S.; Ilican, S.; Caglar, M. Crystalline structure and morphological properties of undoped and Sn doped ZnO thin films. Superlattice Microst. 2009, 46, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Daniel, M.F.; Desbat, B.; Lassegues, J.C.; Gerand, B.; Figlarz, M. Infrared and Raman study of WO3 tungsten trioxides and WO3, xH2O tungsten trioxide hydrates. J. Solid State Chem. 1987, 67, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Salje, E. Lattice dynamics of WO3. Acta Crystallogr. A 1975, 31, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thi, M.P.; Velasco, G. Raman study of WO3 thin films. Solid State Ion. 1984, 14, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Anderson, A. Raman study of ceramic tungsten trioxide at low temperatures. Spectrosc. Lett. 1976, 9, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chan, S.S.; Wachs, I.E.; Murrell, L.L.; Dispenziere, N.C., Jr. Laser Raman characterization of tungsten oxide supported on alumina: Influence of calcinations temperatures. J. Catal. 1985, 92, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tagtstrom, P.; Jansson, U. Chemical vapour deposition of epitaxial WO3 films. Thin Solid Film. 1999, 352, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santato, C.; Odziemkowski, M.; Ulmann, M.; Augustynski, J. Crystallographically oriented mesoporous WO3 films: Synthesis, characterization, and applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10639–10649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shigesato, Y. Photochromic properties of amorphous WO3 Films. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 30, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cazzanelli, E.; Papalino, L.; Pennisi, A.; Simone, F. Spatial variation of structural order in sputtered WO3 films. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bose, R.J.; Kavitha, V.S.; Sudarsanakumar, C.; Pillai, V.P.M. Phase modification and surface plasmon resonance of Au/WO3 system. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 379, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Horcas, I.; Fernandez, R.; Gomez-Rodriguez, J.M.; Colchero, J.; Gomez-Herrero, J.; Baro, A.M. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 013705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Vinodkumar, R.; Lethy, K.J.; Arunkumar, P.R.; Krishnan, R.R.; Pillai, N.V.; Pillai, V.P.M. Effect of cadmium oxide incorporation on the microstructural and optical properties of pulsed laser deposited nanostructured zinc oxide thin films. Reji Philip Mat. Chem. Phys. 2010, 121, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lethy, K.J.; Beena, D.; Kumar, R.V.; Pillai, V.P.M.; Ganesan, V.; Sathe, V.; Phase, D.M. Nanostructured tungsten oxide thin films by the reactive pulsed laser deposition technique. Appl. Phys. A 2008, 91, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Naseri, N.; Azimirad, R.; Akhavan, O.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Improved electrochromical properties of sol–gel WO3 thin films by doping gold nanocrystals. Thin Solid Film. 2010, 518, 2250–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Feng, M.; Pan, A.L.; Zhang, H.R.; Li, Z.A.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.W.; Shi, D.X.; Zou, B.S.; Gao, H.J. Strong photoluminescence of nanostructured crystalline tungsten oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 141901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Baek, Y.; Yong, K. Controlled growth and characterization of tungsten oxide nanowires using thermal evaporation of WO3 powder. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alammar, T.; Hlova, I.Z.; Gupta, S.; Balema, V.; Pecharsky, V.K.; Mudring, A.V. Luminescence properties of mechanochemically synthesized lanthanide containing MIL-78 MOFs. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 7594–7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Tan, S.T.; Chen, B.J.; Sun, X.W.; Fan, W.J.; Kwok, H.S.; Zhang, X.H.; Chua, S.J. Blue shift of optical band gap in ZnO thin films grown by metal-organic chemical-vapour deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 013505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Tauc, J. Amorphous and liquid semiconductors; Plenum Press: London, UK, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  55. Joshi, K.; Rawat, M.; Gautam, S.K.; Singh, R.G.; Ramola, R.C.; Singh, F. Band gap widening and narrowing in Cu-doped ZnO thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 680, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mott, N.F.; Davies, E.A. Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials; ClarendonPress: Oxford, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dakhel, A.A. Influence of dysprosium doping on the electrical and optical properties of CdO thin films. Solar Energy 2009, 83, 934–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dakhel, A.A. Transparent conducting properties of samarium-doped CdO. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 475, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dakhel, A.A. Bandgap narrowing in CdO doped with europium. Opt. Mater. 2009, 31, 691–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dakhel, A.A. Influence of Yb-doping on optoelectrical properties of CdO, nanocrystalline films. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dakhel, A.A. Effect of cerium doping on the structural and optoelectrical properties of CdO nanocrystallite thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 130, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Burstein, E. Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys. Rev. 1954, 93, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anwar, M.; Hogarth, C.A. The optical absorption edge in amorphous thin films of MoO3-In2O3. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24, 3673–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yao, T.; Okada, Y.; Matsui, S.; Ischida, K.; Fujimoto, I. The effect of lattice deformation on optical properties and lattice parameters of ZnSe grown on (100) GaAs. J. Cryst. Growth 1987, 81, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhao, D.G.; Xu, S.J.; Xie, M.H.; Tong, S.Y.; Yang, H. Stress and its effect on optical properties of GaN epilayers grown on Si(111), 6H-SiC(0001), and c-plane sapphire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 677–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wijs, G.A.; Groot, R.A. Amorphous WO3: A first-principles approach. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 1989–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hamberg, I.; Granqvist, C.G. Evaporated Sn-doped In2O3 films: Basic optical properties and applications to energy-efficient windows. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, R123–R159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luo, G.; Shen, L.; Zheng, J.; Xu, C. Europium ions doped WO3 film with bi-function of enhanced electrochromic switching and tunable red emission. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 3488–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shen, L.; Luo, G.; Zheng, J.; Xu, C. Effect of pH on the electrochromic and photoluminescent properties of Eu doped WO3 film. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 278, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, J.; Lee, P.S.; Ma, J. Synthesis, growth mechanism and room-temperature blue luminescence emission of uniform WO3 nanosheets with W as starting material. J. Cryst. Growth 2009, 311, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sungpanich, J.; Thongtem, T.; Thongtem, S. Large-scale synthesis of WO3 nanoplates by a microwave-hydrothermal method. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 1051–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Park, S.; Kim, H.; Jin, C.; Lee, C. Intense ultraviolet emission from needle-like WO3 nanostructures synthesized by noncatalytic thermal evaporation. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Dash, A.; Sarkar, S.; Adusumalli, V.N.K.B.; Mahalingam, V. Microwave Synthesis, photoluminescence, and photocatalytic activity of PVA-functionalized Eu3+-doped BiOX (X = Cl, Br, I) Nanoflakes. Langmuir 2014, 30, 1401–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Du, P.; Bharat, L.K.; Yu, J.S. Strong red emission in Eu3+/Bi3+ ions codoped CaWO4 phosphors for white light emitting diodes and field-emission displays application. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 633, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Som, S.; Mitra, P.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, V.; Terblans, J.J.; Swart, H.C.; Sharma, S.K. The energy transfer phenomena and colourtunability in Y2O2S:Eu3+/Dy3+ micro-fibers for white emission in solid state lighting applications. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 9860–9871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dejnek, M.; Snitzer, E.; Riman, R.E. Blue, Green and red fluorescence and energy transfer of Eu3+ on fluoride glasses. J. Lumin. 1995, 65, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Devi, L.L.; Jayasankar, C.K. Spectroscopic investigations on high efficiency deep red-emitting Ca2SiO4:Eu3+ phosphors synthesized from agricultural waste. Cer. Int. 2018, 44, 14063–14069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Viswanath, C.S.D.; Krishnaiah, K.V.; Jayasankar, C.K. Luminescence properties of europium doped oxyfluorosilicate glasses for visible light devices. Opt. Mater. 2018, 83, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Wang, X. Synthesis and photoluminescence of CeO2:Eu3+ phosphor powders. J. Lumin. 2007, 127, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smith, T.; Guild, J. The C.I.E. colorimetric standards and their use. Trans. Opt. Soc. 1931, 33, 73–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Singh, V.; Mishra, A.K. White light emission from vegetable extracts. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (ae) XRD patterns of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C; (f) variation of FWHM and intensity of the (200) peak as a function of Eu3+-doping content.
Figure 1. (ae) XRD patterns of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C; (f) variation of FWHM and intensity of the (200) peak as a function of Eu3+-doping content.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g001
Figure 2. (a) Variation in the diffraction angle (2θ) (blue dots) and (b) inter-planar separation ( d 200 ) (pink pentagrams) of the intense (200) peak as a function of Eu3+ content.
Figure 2. (a) Variation in the diffraction angle (2θ) (blue dots) and (b) inter-planar separation ( d 200 ) (pink pentagrams) of the intense (200) peak as a function of Eu3+ content.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g002
Figure 3. (ae) Micro-Raman spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C; (f) change in FWHM of the symmetric stretching mode (around ~804 cm−1) as a function of Eu3+-doping content.
Figure 3. (ae) Micro-Raman spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C; (f) change in FWHM of the symmetric stretching mode (around ~804 cm−1) as a function of Eu3+-doping content.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g003
Figure 4. FESEM images of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C.
Figure 4. FESEM images of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g004
Figure 5. (ae) Three-dimensional AFM images of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C; (f) variation of RMS surface roughness with respect to Eu3+-doping concentration.
Figure 5. (ae) Three-dimensional AFM images of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C; (f) variation of RMS surface roughness with respect to Eu3+-doping concentration.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g005
Figure 6. EDX spectra of the un-doped (WEu0) and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded (WEu3) WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C.
Figure 6. EDX spectra of the un-doped (WEu0) and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded (WEu3) WO3 films annealed at a temperature of 600 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g006
Figure 7. X-ray dot mapping image of WEu5 film.
Figure 7. X-ray dot mapping image of WEu5 film.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g007
Figure 8. XPS survey spectra of (a) un-doped (WEu0) and (b) 3 wt% Eu3+-doped (WEu3) WO3 films annealed at 600°C.
Figure 8. XPS survey spectra of (a) un-doped (WEu0) and (b) 3 wt% Eu3+-doped (WEu3) WO3 films annealed at 600°C.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g008
Figure 9. (a,c) Fitted W4f and W5p core energy level spectra of un-doped and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (b,d) fitted O1s core energy level spectra of un-doped and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (e) fitted Eu3d core energy level spectra of 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 film (In the figures; red colour—experimental curve; other colours—fitted curves).
Figure 9. (a,c) Fitted W4f and W5p core energy level spectra of un-doped and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (b,d) fitted O1s core energy level spectra of un-doped and 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (e) fitted Eu3d core energy level spectra of 3 wt% Eu3+-embedded WO3 film (In the figures; red colour—experimental curve; other colours—fitted curves).
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g009
Figure 10. (a,b) Transmittance and absorbance spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Figure 10. (a,b) Transmittance and absorbance spectra of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g010
Figure 11. (a) α 1 2 vs. graphs of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (b) change of band gap energy with respect to Eu3+-doping content.
Figure 11. (a) α 1 2 vs. graphs of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films; (b) change of band gap energy with respect to Eu3+-doping content.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g011
Figure 12. (a) PL emission spectra and (b) CIE chromaticity plot of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Figure 12. (a) PL emission spectra and (b) CIE chromaticity plot of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 00007 g012
Table 1. Structural parameters of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Table 1. Structural parameters of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Sample CodeFWHM (Degree)Crystallite Mean Size (nm) from Scherrer FormulaMicro Strain (×10−3)Dislocation Density (lines/nm2) d 200 (nm)
WEu00.2148381.970.000690.3705
WEu10.1162701.060.000200.3708
WEu30.1112731.030.000180.3711
WEu50.2678302.500.00110.3750
Table 2. Optical and morphological parameters of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Table 2. Optical and morphological parameters of the un-doped and Eu3+-embedded WO3 films annealed at 600 °C.
Sample LabelFilm Thickness (nm)RMS Surface Roughness (nm)Average Transmittance
(%)
Band Gap Energy Eg(eV)CIE Coordinates
XY
WEu02433.48852.950.28930.2419
WEu125115.29802.920.31800.2826
WEu3280102.01512.610.36350.3111
WEu530155.07512.550.36240.2961
WEu101343.49782.490.25470.2126
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kavitha, V.S.; Biju, V.; Gopchandran, K.G.; Praveena, R.; Jayasankar, C.K.; Mekprasart, W.; Boonyarattanakalin, K.; Pecharapa, W.; Pillai, V.P.M. Tailoring the Emission Behavior of WO3 Thin Films by Eu3+ Ions for Light-Emitting Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010007

AMA Style

Kavitha VS, Biju V, Gopchandran KG, Praveena R, Jayasankar CK, Mekprasart W, Boonyarattanakalin K, Pecharapa W, Pillai VPM. Tailoring the Emission Behavior of WO3 Thin Films by Eu3+ Ions for Light-Emitting Applications. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kavitha, V. S., V. Biju, K. G. Gopchandran, R. Praveena, C. K. Jayasankar, Wanichaya Mekprasart, Kanokthip Boonyarattanakalin, Wisanu Pecharapa, and V. P. Mahadevan Pillai. 2023. "Tailoring the Emission Behavior of WO3 Thin Films by Eu3+ Ions for Light-Emitting Applications" Nanomaterials 13, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010007

APA Style

Kavitha, V. S., Biju, V., Gopchandran, K. G., Praveena, R., Jayasankar, C. K., Mekprasart, W., Boonyarattanakalin, K., Pecharapa, W., & Pillai, V. P. M. (2023). Tailoring the Emission Behavior of WO3 Thin Films by Eu3+ Ions for Light-Emitting Applications. Nanomaterials, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop