Next Article in Journal
Optimizing the Rheological and Thermomechanical Response of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene/Silicon Nitride Nanocomposites in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Shaping Silver Nanoparticles’ Size through the Carrier Composition: Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/nano13101586
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Temperature Fluoro-Borosilicate Glass for Controllable Nano-Crystallization in Glass Ceramic Fibers

by
Qichao Zhao
†,
Jianfeng Li
†,
Tingyu Zha
,
Penghui Zhang
,
Yi Long
and
Zaijin Fang
*
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Institute of Photonics Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(10), 1586; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101586
Submission received: 5 April 2023 / Revised: 30 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 9 May 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A fluorosilicate (FS) nano-crystallized glass ceramic (NGC) is one of the most commonly used gain materials for applications in optical devices due to its excellent thermal stability as well as high-efficiency luminescence. However, FS glass can hardly be used to prepare NGC fibers due to its high preparation temperature. Here, a series of low-temperature fluoro-borosilicate (FBS) glasses were designed for the fabrication of active NGC fibers. By modulating B2O3, the preparation temperature of FBS glass was reduced to 1050 °C, and the crystallization in FBS NGCs was more controllable than in FS NGC. The crystallization of the impure phase was inhibited, and single-phase rare earth (RE)-fluoride nanocrystals were controllably precipitated in the FBS NGCs. The 40Si-20B FBS NGC not only exhibited a higher optical transmittance, but the luminescence efficiency was also much higher than traditional FS NGCs. More importantly, NGC fibers were successfully fabricated by using the designed FBS glass as core glass. Nanocrystals were controllably precipitated and greatly enhanced, and upconversion luminescence was observed in NGC fibers. The designed FBS NGCs provided high-quality optical gain materials and offered opportunities for fabricating a wide range of NGC fibers for multiple future applications, including fiber lasers and sensors.

1. Introduction

Actively optical fibers have been extensively investigated owing to their potential for diverse applications in fiber lasers, fiber amplifiers and fiber sensors [1,2,3]. Generally, the properties of optical fibers are deeply governed by glass matrices. The past few decades have witnessed developments in optical gain glasses for exploiting optical fibers featuring high-efficiency and multiple-wavelength luminescence. Nano-crystallized glass ceramic (NGC), a significant composite containing a large number of glass phases as well as specific nanocrystals, has been developed as desirable optical gain material because it possesses the advantage of glass featuring high optical transmittance and that of crystal, exhibiting excellent coordinated environments for efficient luminescence [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Fluorosilicate (FS) NGC has been developed as one of the most common optical gain materials because it possesses strong framework structures constructed by [SiO4] networks as well as efficient luminescence when active ions are incorporated into fluoride crystals featuring intrinsically low phonon energy. Thus, FS NGC exhibited excellent thermal stability as well as high-efficiency luminescence. So far, a variety of FS NGCs containing NaYF4, LaF3, YF3, KSc2F7 and KYb3F10 have been designed to enhance the luminescence efficiency of active ions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
More importantly, FS NGC maintains the unique fiber drawing properties of glass when it is heated to soften with temperature. This provides significant opportunities for the fabrication of optical fibers containing nanocrystals based on NGCs. Since nanocrystals are precipitated from a glass matrix in NGC fibers, the luminescence efficiency is greatly enhanced, and the emission wavelength is modulated when active ions are successfully incorporated into crystal lattices, providing highly promising developments for efficient fiber devices, such as high-power fiber lasers, broadband fiber amplifiers and fiber sensors [21,22,23]. So far, NGC fibers containing functional nanocrystals have been fabricated via various techniques [24,25,26,27]. To achieve high-quality NGC fibers, the key point is the controllable precipitation of nanocrystals in fibers. Recently, the “melt-in-tube” technique has been proven to be the most feasible method for the fabrication of NGC fibers [28,29,30,31,32]. In the fiber drawing process, fibers are a precursor at the drawing temperature where the fiber core glass is melted while the clad is softened. The traditional FS of glass is not suitable for the fabrication of NGC fibers due to high preparation temperatures (>1450 °C), which lead to the heavy volatilization of fluorine in the glass melt and a drastic interfacial reaction between the fiber core and clad during the melt-in-tube fiber drawing process. Crystal is not controllably precipitated in the fiber, and the fabrication of NGC fiber is unsuccessful. These shortcomings limit the practical applications of FS NGCs in fiber devices. Therefore, it is necessary to explore novel FS glass networks for the fabrication of high-quality NGCs and NGC fibers.
Generally, fluoro-borosilicate (FBS) glass, exhibiting a lower preparation temperature by adding B2O3 into the FS glass, has been developed as an optical gain material [33]. Moreover, fluoride nanocrystals can also be precipitated from FBS glass to form efficiently luminescent NGCs [34,35]. In this work, a system of novel fluoro-borosilicate (FBS) glass networks was designed to prepare active NGCs and NGC fibers embedded with fluoride nanocrystals and achieve high-efficiency luminescence. The incorporation of B2O3 into FS glass significantly reduced the preparation temperature, decreased the volatilization of fluorine and decreased the reaction between the fiber core and cladding. Additionally, B-O bonds decreased the aggregation of fluoride glass networks in FS glass and thus obtained controllable crystallization in NGCs [36]. The prepared NGCs provided a high-quality gain material for efficient luminescence and offered significant opportunities for the fabrication of active NGC fibers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials Preparation

In this work, glasses with the nominal components of (60-x)SiO2-xB2O3-20KF-20ZnF2 were chosen as the host glasses (in mol %) (x = 0, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40). These samples are referred to as 60Si-FS, 50Si-10B, 40Si-20B, 30Si-30B and 20Si-40B FBS glasses, respectively. In addition, YbF3 and ErF3 were doped into the glasses to achieve upconversion (UC) luminescence. All glasses were prepared using the melt-quenching method. A stoichiometric mixture of 30 g of the reagent grades SiO2 (99.99%), ZnF2 (99.99%), KF (99.99%), YbF3 (99.99%) and ErF3 (99.99%) was mixed thoroughly and then melted in a platinum-rhodium crucible at temperatures ranging from 1000 to 1450 °C. The crucible was covered during the glass preparation process. The glass melt was poured onto a cold brass mold and pressed with another brass plate to prepare the precursor glasses. Then, the precursor glasses were heat treated to fabricate NGCs. In order to prepare NGC fibers, the Yb3+-Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B FBS glass and commercial borosilicate glass (composition: 80SiO2-11B2O3-9Na2O (mol%)) were selected as the core and clad material, respectively. The NGC fibers were fabricated via the melt-in-tube method [26]. The precursor fiber was drawn at 1080 °C, where the core glass melted while the clad glass was softened. By quick drawing (15 m/s), the FBS precursor fiber was prepared. Then, the precursor fibers were treated with heat to prepare NGC fibers.

2.2. Characterizations

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, STA 449 C, NETZSCH, Bavaria, Germany) analysis was performed in an argon atmosphere to study the glass transition temperature and crystallization temperature at a rate of 10 K min−1. To identify the crystalline phase in NGCs, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed on an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Fällanden, Switzerland) using Cu/Ka (λ = 0.1541 nm) radiation. The morphology and size distribution of the nanocrystals in NGCs were measured by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) (Tecnai G2, FEI, Omaha, NE, USA). The UC emission spectra of the samples were recorded using an Edinburgh FLS980 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, Edinburgh, UK). Transmission spectra were measured by a UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer (Lambda-900, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). A 980 nm laser diode (LD) was used as the excitation source to measure the UC emission spectra. Quantum yields of the samples were measured using the same spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere. The measurement details of the quantum yield values are similar to our previous works [10]. All measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

The DSC curves of the FBS glasses are shown in Figure 1. From the DSC curve, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of 50Si-10B, 40Si-20B, 30Si-30B and 20Si-40B glass was found to be 455, 450, 454 and 453 °C, respectively. The crystallization peak temperature (Tp) of 50Si-10B, 40Si-20B, 30Si-30B and 20Si-40B glass was found to be 623, 615, 604 and 592 °C, respectively. To prepare high-quality NGCs containing fluoride nanocrystals, the heat treatment temperature for the glasses was set between the Tg and Tp.
To reveal the evolution of crystalline phases in the NGCs, the XRD patterns of Yb3+-Er3+ co-doped FS and FBS NGCs were carefully investigated and are shown in Figure 2a. It is clear that KYb3F10 crystals were precipitated in the 60Si-0B FS NGC. Meanwhile, the diffraction peaks of the KZnF3 crystal were also observed in the XRD pattern of 60Si FS NGC. KYb3F10 crystals confined Yb3+ ions in fluoride crystal environments featuring low phonon energy [10,17], while KZnF3 provided no appropriate lattice for the incorporation of RE ions. Thus, the crystallization of KZnF3 in the FS NGC made no contribution to the enhancement of luminescence for RE, ions and KZnF3 was an impure phase in the FS NGC. For the 55Si-5B FBS NGC, KZnF3 and KYb3F10 crystals were also both precipitated from the glass via heat treatment. The intensities of the diffraction peaks in 55Si-5B FBS NGC were all higher than the corresponding peaks in 60Si FS NGC, indicating that more KZnF3 and KYb3F10 crystals were precipitated in 55Si-5B FBS NGC. However, the diffraction peak of KZnF3 crystals was not observed in the XRD patterns of FBS NGCs when the B2O3 concentration increased from 10 to 40%. More importantly, only the diffraction peaks of KYb2F7 crystals were precipitated in XRD patterns of 50Si-10B, 40Si-20B and 30Si-30B NGCs, proving that pure RE-fluoride crystals were precipitated in these FBS NGCs. For 20Si-40B NGC, the diffraction peaks of KYb2F7 crystals were weak, and other impure phases could be observed in the XRD patterns. Therefore, the crystallization of the impure KZnF3 phase was successfully inhibited, and pure RE-fluoride crystals were controllably precipitated in the FBS NGCs with adjustable compositions when B2O3 concentration, which changed from 10 to 30 mol%.
In order to illuminate the crystallization mechanism in FBS NGCs, the XRD patterns of 40Si-20B FBS NGCs with various concentrations of the dopants are presented in Figure 2b. The XRD pattern of the no-doped sample exhibited broadband, and no feature of the crystal can be found, indicating that no crystal was precipitated in the no-doped sample even though the glass was also heat treated at 520 °C. Interestingly, sharp diffraction peaks of the crystals were observed in the XRD patterns of Yb3+-Er3+ co-doped NGCs. These peaks all matched well with those of the JCPDS Card of KYb2F7 (027-0457) crystal, proving that pure KYb2F7 crystals were precipitated in the 1.0Yb3+-Er3+ co-doped NGC. Furthermore, the intensities of diffraction peaks for KYb2F7 crystals were enhanced monotonously when the concentration of Yb3+ increased from 1.0 to 2.0 mol%. These results indicate that the crystallization in the FBS NGC was highly dependent on the doping of Yb3+. This crystal was not precipitated from the no-doped host glass, and a small number of dopants induced the crystallization in NGCs. This is called dopant-induced crystallization [10].
In the 60Si-FS glasses, interpenetrating phase separation was observed in the networks [37]. Yb3+ ions were distributed in the separated fluoride networks and worked as a crystallization center to induce the precipitation of KYb3F10 crystals (Figure 2a) [10]. Moreover, a large number of ZnF2 and KF were distributed in the fluoride networks and thus, KZnF3 crystals were precipitated in the FS NGC. In the FBS glasses, [BO3], units were distributed among the glass networks and worked as network modifiers when the content of B2O3 was low. A part of the Si-O frameworks was broken, and the local viscosity was reduced when 5 mol% B2O3 was incorporated into the glass. Thus, more KYb3F10 and KZnF3 crystals were precipitated in the 55Si-5B FBS NGC after the heat treatments compared to 60Si NGC (Figure 2a). However, when the content of B2O3 in the FBS glass increased to 10 mol%, a “boron anomaly” occurred in FBS glasses. [BO4] tetrahedrons appeared in the glass networks, worked as network formers and constructed the framework structure of glass together with [SiO4] tetrahedrons. The micro phase-separation also occurred in FBS glass networks, and thus, RE-fluoride crystals were precipitated from the separated fluoride networks, and crystallizations were induced by the doping of Yb3+ in the FBS NGCs (Figure 2a,b), which was similar to that of FS NGC. Actually, two molar [BO4] units were produced when one molar B2O3 replaced one SiO2. Thus, the framework structures of glass were strengthened, and fluoride networks were dispersed by the introduction of B2O3 [36], which restrained the precipitation of the impure KZnF3 phase, as presented in Figure 2a,b. Therefore, the design of FBS NGCs inhibited the precipitation of the impure phase and RE-fluoride crystals were controllably precipitated in a system of FBS NGCs when the glass composition varied in a large range.
Figure 2c shows the XRD patterns of the 40Si-20B glass and NGCs. Owing to the amorphous morphology of the glass, a broad band was observed in the XRD pattern of the glass, indicating that no crystals were precipitated in the precursor glass. Only the diffraction peaks of KYb2F7 crystal were observed in the XRD patterns of samples heat treated at 460 and 500 °C for 10 h. The diffraction peaks of KYb3F10 were also observed in the XRD pattern apart from those of KYb2F7 when the sample was heat treated at 540 °C for 10 h. However, only the peaks of KYb3F10 crystals could be observed in the XRD patterns of NGC when heat treated at 580 °C for 10 h. The intense diffraction peaks indicate that a large number of KYb3F10 crystals were precipitated in NGCs. These results prove that the crystalline phases in the FBS NGCs were also modulated by heat treatments and transfer from KYb2F7 to KYb3F10 crystals when the temperature increased from 460 to 580 °C.
Additionally, the TEM image of 1.0Yb3+-0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B NGC heat treated at 580 °C for 10 h, as shown in Figure 2d, revealed that crystal particles were uniformly dispersed in the glass matrix with a diameter from 5 to 30 nm. The interval of crystal lattice fringes could be measured directly in the HR-TEM image in the inset of Figure 2d, and its value was about 0.204 nm, which corresponded to the (440) crystal facet of KYb3F10, proving the precipitation of KYb3F10 nanocrystals in the 40Si-20B NGC.
Owing to high phonon energy in the FBS glass networks, no emission was observed in the 40Si-20B glass, as shown in Figure 3a. As proved above, KYb2F7 and KYb3F10 crystals were controllably precipitated in the FBS NGCs. Owing to the precipitation of RE-fluoride crystals, RE ions are incorporated into the crystal structure from the glass networks during the heat treatments. The RE-fluoride crystals possessed lower phonon energy compared to the glass networks, resulting in the high emission efficiency of RE ions in the NGCs. As shown in Figure 3a, intense emission peaks attributed to UC emissions of Yb3+-Er3+ ion pairs were observed in the NGCs. The peaks around 522, 540 and 650 nm were assigned to 2H11/2⇒4I15/2, 4S3/2⇒4I15/2, and 4F9/2⇒4I15/2 transitions of Er3+ ions, respectively. The UC emission intensity of NGCs was enhanced monotonously when the heat treatment temperature increased from 460 to 580 °C. The phonon energy of the KYb3F10 crystal was as low as 387 cm−1. The emission intensity of NGC heat treated at 580 °C increased dramatically because a large number of KYb3F10 crystals were precipitated in the NGC. Accordingly, the controllable crystallization in NGCs significantly enhanced the UC emissions of Yb3+-Er3+ pairs.
The compared emission spectra of FS and FBS NGCs when heat treated at 520 °C for 10 h are shown in Figure 3b. Excited by the use of a 980 nm laser diode, the emission intensity was enhanced by the addition of B2O3 into NGCs, reaching a maximum of 20 mol% B2O3. The emission intensity decreased obviously when the B2O3 concentration increased to 30%, and the emission in 20Si-40B NGC was very weak due to a small number of RE-fluoride crystals in the NGC. The emission intensity in 40Si-20B FBS NGC was even higher than in 60Si FS NGC. The incorporation of B2O3 into the glass enhanced the UC emission intensity of Er3+ in the NGC, and 40Si-20B NGC was the most efficient gain material for UC luminescence.
More importantly, the UC emission intensity of Er3+ in the 40Si-20B NGC was much higher than that in traditional β-NaYF4 and KYb2F7 NGC, as shown in Figure 3c. In past studies, the quantum yields of UC luminescence in NGCs were all below 1%. The quantum yield of UC luminescence in 40Si-20B NGC was as high as 2.16%, which is higher than 60Si FS NGC (1.56%) and even 3.4 and 4.2 times higher than that of the traditional β-NaYF4 (0.64%) and KYb2F7 (0.51%) NGC, respectively (Figure 3d). The NGC containing β-NaYF4 crystals has been considered one of the most efficient luminescent NGC [38]. RE ions are incorporated into the crystal structures via ionic substitution processes for Y3+. Owing to the ionic mismatch between RE and Y3+ ions, the quantity of active ions incorporated into crystal structures in β-NaYF4 NGC is usually small. For our 40Si-20B FBS NGC, RE-fluoride crystals were controllably precipitated from the glass induced by the doped RE ions. RE ions were all confined in the fluoride crystals during the crystallization process of KYb3F10 [10], resulting in a more efficient UC emission in 40Si-20B FBS NGC. In order to precipitate KYb2F7 crystals in the traditional NGC, a large number of YbF3 (~6%) was added to the glass [39]. The highly concentrated RE ions in NGCs lead to a heavy absorption of excited light, the probability of non-radiative transitions was very high, and the thermal quenching of luminescence was severe in the traditional KYb2F7 NGC. However, owing to the dopant-induced crystallization of FBS NGCs, the concentrations of Yb3+ were low and thermal quenching of luminescence was slight. Thus, the quantum yield in the traditional KYb2F7 NGC was much lower than in 40Si-20B NGC. This indicates that dopant-induced crystallization in the FBS NGC made a contribution to the highest efficiency of UC luminescence and provided significant opportunities for overcoming the bottleneck in the UC luminescence efficiency of traditional NGCs.
The transmission spectra of FS and FBS NGCs are shown in Figure 4. The peaks at 976nm are all attributed to Yb3+: 2F7/2⇒2F5/2 transitions. The peaks at 800, 647, 537, and 520 nm were ascribed to transitions from the ground state 4I15/2 to excited levels 4I9/2, 4F9/2, 4S3/2, and 2H11/2 of Er3+, respectively. The transmittances of 60Si FS NGCs were lower than that of the precursor glass. The transmittances were reduced dramatically when the heat treatment temperature was increased. The scattering caused by the crystal particles in 60Si NGC led to a decrease in the transmittance, as shown in the transmission spectrum (Figure 4a). For the 50Si-10B FBS samples, the transmittances of NGCs also reduced when the heat treatment temperature increased. The transmittances of 50Si-10B NGCs were higher than those of 60Si FS NGCs. Interestingly, the transmittances of 40Si-20B NGCs were almost equal to that of the precursor glass. The 40Si-20B NGCs samples were very all transparent, and their transmittance was as high as 90% at 600 nm even though the sample was heat treated at 580 °C for 10 h. As presented in the XRD pattern in Figure 2a, KZnF3 crystals were precipitated in the 60Si NGC. The peaks of KZnF3 in 60Si NGC were sharper than those of KYb2F7 crystals in FBS NGCs. The average sizes of KZnF3 crystals were larger than that of KYb2F7 crystals, which resulted in heavy optical scattering and the low optical transmittance of 60Si NGC. The refractive index for the KYb3F10 crystal was about 1.48, and that of FBS glass was measured at 1.49 at 633 nm. The small difference between the refractive index of KYb3F10 crystal and the glass matrix made a contribution to the high transmittance of NGCs. Moreover, the transmittances of 30Si-30B NGCs decreased dramatically by the heat treatments due to the heavy separation of B-O phases when too much B2O3 was added to the glass. Therefore, the incorporation of B2O3 into FS glass restrained the precipitation of the impure phase (KZnF3) and obviously increased the optical transmittance of NGCs. 40Si-20B NGCs exhibited the highest transmittances among the NGCs.
As proved above, the RE ions that doped 40Si-20B NGC exhibited the most efficient UC luminescence and highest optical transmittance. Moreover, the crystallization of RE-fluoride nanocrystals in 40Si-20B NGC was more controllable compared to FS NGC. This indicated that the 40Si-20B NGC was a more desirable gain material for optical devices. Previously, we have tried to fabricate NGC fiber by using 60Si FS glass as the core glass through a melt-in-tube method. However, no nanocrystal was precipitated in the fiber due to the volatilization of fluorine at the high preparation temperature.
The compositions of the FS and FBS glasses were quantitatively established through the use of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) measurements (Table 1). These measured compositions differed from the nominal values. Fluorine losses for FS and FBS glasses were calculated at 40.35 and 27.60 mass%, respectively. The preparation temperature of 40Si-20B FBS glass (1050 °C) was much lower than that of 60Si FS glass (1450 °C), which reduced the volatilization of fluorine in optical fibers during the fiber drawing process. Accordingly, 40Si-20B NGC is an excellent candidate for the fabrication of active NGC fibers.
The NGC fibers were fabricated by using Yb3+-Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B FBS glass as the core glass through a melt-in-tube method. The fiber core exhibited as amorphous and transparent, as shown in the inset Figure 5a. Then, the precursor fibers were heat treated at 580 °C for 10 h to fabricate NGC fibers. Nanocrystals were precipitated in the NGC fibers (inset (Figure 5c)). They were irradiated through the use of a 980 nm laser diode, and an intense yellow emission is observed in the NGC fiber (inset (Figure 5b)), which could be ascribed to the UC emission of Yb3+-Er3+ pairs as presented in the spectrum in Figure 5. However, no obvious emission was observed in the precursor fiber. These results indicate that the RE-fluoride nanocrystals were controllably precipitated in the fibers. Therefore, the designed FBS glass could provide an excellent matrix when engineering NGC fibers for their application in optical devices.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a series of FBS glasses were engineered to fabricate high-quality NGCs and NGC active fibers. The preparation temperature was reduced from 1450 °C to 1050 °C by the addition of B2O3 into the glasses. Compared to FS NGC, the crystallizations in FBS NGCs were more controlled due to the dispersion of the fluoride network by B2O3. Impure phase (KZnF3) crystals were precipitated in FS NGC, but these were not observed in the XRD patterns of FBS NGCs. Pure phase KYb2F7 nanocrystals were controllably precipitated in FBS NGCs when the B2O3 content changed from 10 to 30%. The crystalline phase was modulated from Kyb2F7 to Kyb3F10 when the heat treatment temperature increased to 580 °C, and this led to the greatest enhancement of UC emissions in the NGCs. The optical transmittances of FBS NGCs were higher than FS NGC due to their controllable crystallization in FBS NGCs. More importantly, the designed 40Si-20B FBS NGCs exhibited the highest transmittance as well as the most efficient UC luminescence. The NGC fibers were successfully fabricated based on the 40Si-20B FBS glass. A greatly enhanced UC emission was observed in the NGC fibers compared to the precursor fiber. These intriguing properties indicate that the designed FBS NGCs could prove excellent optical gain materials and promising matrices for the manufacturing of optical fiber devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F.; methodology, Q.Z., J.L. and Y.L.; formal analysis, Q.Z., J.L. and T.Z.; investigation, Q.Z., J.L., P.Z. and Z.F.; resources, Z.F.; data curation, J.L., T.Z., Q.Z. and Z.F.; writing—original draft, Q.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.F.; supervision, Z.F.; project administration, Z.F.; funding acquisition, Z.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62275105). This work was also supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515011938, 2023A1515012264), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (2023A04J1736).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jackson, S.D. Towards high-power mid-infrared emission from a fibre laser. Nat. Photonics. 2012, 6, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jauregui, C.; Limpert, J.; Tünnermann, A. High-power fibre lasers. Nat. Photon. 2013, 7, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Ma, C.; Inoue, H.; Yang, G.; Zheng, S.; Chen, D.; Yang, Z.; Masuno, A.; Orava, J.; et al. Mesoscale engineering of photonic glass for tunable luminescence. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fang, Z.; Peng, W.; Zheng, S.; Qiu, J.; Guan, B.-O. Controllable modulation of coordination environments of Mn2+ in glasses and glass-ceramics for tunable luminescence. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 1658–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.; Yue, Y.; Qiu, J. Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 38–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, D.; Lu, W.; Qiu, J.; Yu, S.F. Phonon-assisted population inversion in lanthanide-doped upconversion Ba2LaF7 nanocrystals in glass-ceramics. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8045–8050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Lin, J.; He, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, C.; Huang, F.; Chen, D. Remarkable laser-driven upconverting photothermal effect of Cs3LnF6@ glass nanocomposites for anti-counterfeiting. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, G.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, G.; Ma, Z.; Peng, M.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. 2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 3071–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, S.; Huang, Z.; Lin, W.; Yang, D.; Zhao, J.; Qiao, X.; Xiao, X.; Xu, S.; Qiu, J.; Du, J.; et al. Enhanced single-mode fiber laser emission by nano-crystallization of oxyfluoride glass-ceramic cores. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 5155–5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fang, Z.; Li, J.; Sun, L.-P.; Zhi, Y.; Long, Y.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, J.; Guan, B.-O. In situ dopant-induced nano-crystallization of rare-earth-fluoride crystals in phase-separated networks for highly-efficient photoemission and photonic devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 9001–9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, D.; Peng, Y.; Li, X.; Zhong, J.; Huang, H.; Chen, J. Simultaneous tailoring of dual-phase fluoride precipitation and dopant distribution in glass to control upconverting luminescence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 30053–30064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Lin, J.; Yang, C.; Huang, F.; Chen, D. Nanocrystallization of lanthanide-doped KLu2F7-KYb2F7 solid-solutions in aluminosilicate glass for upconverted solid-state-lighting and photothermal anti-counterfeiting. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 14571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ali, M.A.; Ren, J.; Liu, X.; Qiao, X.; Qiu, J. Understanding enhanced upconversion luminescence in oxyfluoride glass-ceramics based on local structure characterizations and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 15384–15391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, Z.; Wang, W.; Kang, S.; Cui, W.; Zhang, H.; Yu, G.; Wang, T.; Dong, G.; Jiang, C.; Zhou, S.; et al. Tailorable upconversion white light emission from Pr3+ single-doped glass ceramics via simultaneous dual-lasers excitation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1700787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, Z.; Guo, S.; Lu, X.; Orava, J.; Wagner, T.; Zheng, L.; Liu, Y.; Sun, S.; He, F.; Yang, P.; et al. Controlling selective doping and energy transfer between transition metal and rare earth ions in nanostructured glassy solids. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1701407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Z.; Cui, W.; Kang, S.; Zhang, H.; Dong, G.; Jiang, C.; Zhou, S.; Qiu, J. Fast-slow red upconversion fluorescence modulation from Ho3+-doped glass ceramics upon two-wavelength excitation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1600554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, Z.; Li, J.; Long, Y.; Guan, B.-O. High-efficiency luminescence in optical glass via the controllable crystallization of KYb3F10 nanocrystals depending on the dopants. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3030–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Long, Y.; Li, J.; Fang, Z.; Guan, B.-O. Modulation of activator distribution by phase-separation of glass for efficient and tunable upconversion luminescence. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 12217–12223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Long, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zheng, S.; Fang, Z.; Guan, B.-O. Nano-crystallization of Ln-fluoride crystals in glass-ceramics via inducing of Yb3+ for efficient near-infrared upconversion luminescence of Tm3+. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Long, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zheng, S.; Fang, Z.; Guan, B. Efficient white upconversion luminescence in Yb3+/Eu3+ doubly-doped transparent glass ceramic. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 21763–21772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, S.; Qiao, T.; Huang, X.; Yang, C.; Liu, X.; Qiu, J.; Yang, Z.; Dong, G. Enhanced CW lasing and Q-switched pulse generation enabled by Tm3+-doped glass ceramic fibers. Adv. Optical. Mater. 2020, 9, 2001774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Q.; Pan, Q.; Kang, S.; Cai, Z.; Ye, S.; Xiong, P.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. Transparent nanocrystal-in-glass composite (NGC) fibers for multifunctional temperature and pressure sensing. Fundam. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, D.; Xu, B.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Man, T.; Mo, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Cao, S.; et al. Broadband optical amplification of pbs quantum-dot-doped glass fibers. Adv. Photonics Res. 2022, 3, 2200097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ballato, J.; Peacock, A.C. Perspective: Molten core optical fiber fabrication—A route to new materials and applications. APL Photon. 2018, 3, 120903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, W.; Zhou, B.; Xu, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Q. Recent advances in soft optical glass fiber and fiber lasers. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 101, 90–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tick, P.A. Are low-loss glass–ceramic optical waveguides possible? Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1904–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blanc, W.; Lu, Z.; Robine, T.; Pigeonneau, F.; Molardi, C.; Tosi, D. Nanoparticles in optical fiber, issue and opportunity of light scattering [Invited]. Opt. Mater. Express 2022, 12, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Peng, W.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J. Fabrication and characterization of glass-ceramic fiber containing Cr3+-Doped ZnAl2O4 Nanocrystals. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 2272–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, Z.; Xiao, X.; Wang, X.; Ma, Z.; Lewis, E.; Farrell, G.; Wang, P.; Ren, J.; Guo, H.; Qiu, J. Glass-ceramic optical fiber containing Ba2TiSi2O8 nanocrystals for frequency conversion of lasers. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Peng, W.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.; Dong, G.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Qiu, J. Ni2+ doped glass ceramic fiber fabricated by melt-in-tube method and successive heat treatment. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 28258–28263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, X.; Fang, Z.; Kang, S.; Peng, W.; Dong, G.; Zhou, B.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, S.; Qiu, J. Controllable fabrication of novel all solid-state PbS quantum dot-doped glass fibers with tunable broadband near-infrared emission. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 7927–7934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, X.; Fang, Z.; Peng, Z.; Ma, Z.; Guo, H.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. Formation, element-migration and broadband luminescence in quantum dot-doped glass fibers. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 19691–19700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jose, A.; Krishnapriya, T.; Jose, J.R.; Joseph, C.; Biju, P.R. NIR photoluminescent characteristics of Nd3+ activated fluoroborosilicate glasses for laser material applications. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 634, 413772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peng, W.; Fang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Qiu, J. Enhanced upconversion emission in crystallization-controllable glass-ceramic fiber containing Yb3+-Er3+ codoped CaF2 nanocrystals. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 405203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Huang, X.; Guo, Q.; Yang, D.; Xiao, X.; Liu, X.; Xia, Z.; Fan, F.; Qiu, J.; Dong, G. Reversible 3D laser printing of perovskite quantum dots inside a transparent medium. Nat. Photon. 2020, 14, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Hu, L.; Ren, J. Structural studies of rare earth-doped fluoroborosilicate glasses by advanced solid-state NMR. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 8919–8929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Peng, W.; Shao, C.; Zheng, S.; Hu, L.; Qiu, J.; Guan, B.-O. Phase-separation engineering of glass for drastic enhancement of upconversion luminescence. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1801572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.; Chen, D.; Huang, F.; Chang, G.; Zhao, J.; Qiao, X.; Xu, X.; Du, J.; Yin, M. Phase-selective nanocrystallization of NaLnF4 in aluminosilicate glass for random laser and 940 nm LED-excitable upconverted luminescence. Laser Photon-Rev. 2018, 12, 1800030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, J.; Hu, F.; Chen, L.; Guo, H.; Duan, C.; Yin, M. Optical thermometry based on up-conversion luminescence behavior of Er3+-doped KYb2F7 nano-crystals in bulk glass ceramics. J. Alloy Compd. 2017, 693, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g001 550
Figure 1. DSC curves of 50Si-10B (a), 40Si-20B (b), 30Si-30B (c) and 20Si-40B (d) FBS glasses.
Figure 1. DSC curves of 50Si-10B (a), 40Si-20B (b), 30Si-30B (c) and 20Si-40B (d) FBS glasses.
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g001
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Compared XRD patterns of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped FS and FBS NGCs when heat treated at 520 °C for 10 h, (b) XRD patterns of no-doped and xYb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B NGCs (x = 1.0–2.0) when heat treated at 520 °C for 10 h, (c) XRD patterns of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B glass and NGCs when heated at different temperatures, (d) TEM image of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B NGC when heated at 580 °C for 10 h; the inset is the enlarged HR-TEM image.
Figure 2. (a) Compared XRD patterns of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped FS and FBS NGCs when heat treated at 520 °C for 10 h, (b) XRD patterns of no-doped and xYb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B NGCs (x = 1.0–2.0) when heat treated at 520 °C for 10 h, (c) XRD patterns of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B glass and NGCs when heated at different temperatures, (d) TEM image of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B NGC when heated at 580 °C for 10 h; the inset is the enlarged HR-TEM image.
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g002
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Emission spectra of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B glass and NGCs, (b) Emission spectra of 1.0 Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped FS and FBS NGCs, (c) Compared emission spectra and (d) Quantum yield values of different NGCs.
Figure 3. (a) Emission spectra of 1.0Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped 40Si-20B glass and NGCs, (b) Emission spectra of 1.0 Yb3+−0.2Er3+ co-doped FS and FBS NGCs, (c) Compared emission spectra and (d) Quantum yield values of different NGCs.
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g003
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g004 550
Figure 4. Transmission spectra of (a) 60Si, (b) 50Si-10B, (c) 40Si-20B and (d) 40Si-20B glass and NGCs.
Figure 4. Transmission spectra of (a) 60Si, (b) 50Si-10B, (c) 40Si-20B and (d) 40Si-20B glass and NGCs.
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g004
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g005 550
Figure 5. Emission spectra of the precursor fiber and NGC fiber; inset are the photos of the fiber cross section (a), NGC fiber irradiated by using a 980 nm laser diode (b) and TEM image of NGC fibers (c).
Figure 5. Emission spectra of the precursor fiber and NGC fiber; inset are the photos of the fiber cross section (a), NGC fiber irradiated by using a 980 nm laser diode (b) and TEM image of NGC fibers (c).
Nanomaterials 13 01586 g005
Table
Table 1. Compositions of the FS and FBS glasses.
Table 1. Compositions of the FS and FBS glasses.
Nominated (Mass %)Measured (Mass %)Fluorine Loss (%)
60Si FS glass18.2910.9140.35
40Si-20B FBS glass16.2311.7527.60
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Q.; Li, J.; Zha, T.; Zhang, P.; Long, Y.; Fang, Z. Low-Temperature Fluoro-Borosilicate Glass for Controllable Nano-Crystallization in Glass Ceramic Fibers. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1586. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101586

AMA Style

Zhao Q, Li J, Zha T, Zhang P, Long Y, Fang Z. Low-Temperature Fluoro-Borosilicate Glass for Controllable Nano-Crystallization in Glass Ceramic Fibers. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(10):1586. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Qichao, Jianfeng Li, Tingyu Zha, Penghui Zhang, Yi Long, and Zaijin Fang. 2023. "Low-Temperature Fluoro-Borosilicate Glass for Controllable Nano-Crystallization in Glass Ceramic Fibers" Nanomaterials 13, no. 10: 1586. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13101586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop