Next Article in Journal
High-Crystallinity BiOCl Nanosheets as Efficient Photocatalysts for Norfloxacin Antibiotic Degradation
Previous Article in Journal
The 3D Controllable Fabrication of Nanomaterials with FIB-SEM Synchronization Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/nano13121840
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study on the Impermeability of Nanodispersible Modified Bentonite Based on Colloidal Osmotic Pressure Mechanisms and the Adsorption of Harmful Substances

by
Xi Wei
,
Chunyang Zhang
,
Depeng Gong
,
Mengdong Tu
,
Lili Wu
,
Wanyu Chen
and
Chaocan Zhang
*
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(12), 1840; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121840
Submission received: 21 May 2023 / Revised: 5 June 2023 / Accepted: 8 June 2023 / Published: 11 June 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With the growing demands of human beings, sanitary landfill, along with the increase in landfill depth and leachate water pressure, has put forward new and higher requirements for the impermeable layer. In particular, it is required to have a certain adsorption capacity of harmful substances from the perspective of environmental protection. Hence, the impermeability of polymer bentonite–sand mixtures (PBTS) at different water pressure and the adsorption properties of polymer bentonite (PBT) on contaminants were investigated through the modification of PBT using betaine compounded with sodium polyacrylate (SPA). It was found that the composite modification of betaine and SPA could reduce the average particle size of PBT dispersed in water (reduced to 106 nm from 201 nm) and enhance the swelling properties. As the content of SPA increased, the hydraulic conductivity of PBTS system decreases and the permeability resistance improves, while the resistance to external water pressure increases. It is proposed a concept of the potential of osmotic pressure in a constrained space to explain the impermeability mechanism of PBTS. The potential of osmotic pressure obtained by linear extrapolation of the trendline of colloidal osmotic pressure versus mass content of PBT could represent the external water pressure that the PBT resist. Additionally, the PBT also has a high adsorption capacity for both organic pollutants and heavy metal ions. The adsorption rate of PBT was up to 99.36% for phenol; up to 99.9% for methylene blue; and 99.89%, 99.9%, and 95.7% for low concentrations of Pb2+, Cd2+, and Hg+, respectively. This work is expected to provide strong technical support for the future development in the field of impermeability and removal of hazardous substances (organic and heavy metals).

1. Introduction

With deepening urbanization, industrial waste and municipal waste have increased rapidly. The current method of waste disposal is mainly sanitary landfill, an efficient way to prevent pollutants from polluting the environment [1,2]. Leachate from sanitary landfilling, however, typically contains organic contaminants and heavy metal ions, damaging both the local ecological environment and public health [3,4,5]. Organic pollutants significantly harm biological and human health, weaken the body’s defenses against illness, and result in birth abnormalities and reproductive issues [6,7,8]. Heavy metal ions could pose a major threat to ecosystems and human health even at low concentrations because of their high mobility, bioaccumulation, tremendous toxicity, and cancer-causing potential [9]. Lead and cadmium are examples of heavy metal ions that can harm the kidneys and induce analgesia [10], hepatitis, carcinogenesis [11], pulmonary fibrosis [12], and indigestion [13]. Leachate pollution of the environment can be avoided via impermeable layers [2,14]. The primary types of impermeable layers include geomembranes, geosynthetic clay liners (GCL), compacted clay liners (CCL), and bentonite–sand mixes (BS) [15]. Due to the uneven settlement of the foundation, CCL, GCL, and geomembrane may be destroyed and impermeability decreased. However, the BS is a main direction for the development of impermeable layers as it is low cost, self-healing, and has low permeability [16,17].
Bentonite is a kind of clay, with montmorillonite as the main mineral. The basic structure of the montmorillonite crystal lattice consists of silica (tetrahedron) and alumina (octahedron). Additionally, there are two primary types of bentonite: sodium bentonite and calcium bentonite [18]. As a result of the layers of montmorillonite absorbing water molecules, bentonite dictated the impermeability of BS, which showed up as macroinflation [19,20]. Bentonite may be biologically changed to increase its impermeability [21,22]. According to Salemi [17], sodium polyacrylate (SPA)-modified bentonite can reduce the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite from 1.73 × 10−7 m/s to 2.06 × 10−8 m/s. By altering bentonite with polyacrylic acid, Scalia [23] demonstrated that the hydraulic conductivity of bentonite decreased from 2 × 10−10 m/s to 8 × 10−11 m/s. Based on Ozhan [24], modified bentonite containing cationic polyacrylamide can lower hydraulic conductivity from 3.4 × 10−10 m/s to 5.4 × 10−11 m/s. Zhang [25] verified that the anionic polyacrylamide-modified bentonite reduced hydraulic conductivity from 3.91 × 10−10 to 2.12 × 10−11 m/s. A skeleton created by sand in the BS enhanced the structural durability of the impermeable layer, facilitating its long-term use [26]. The mechanism of impermeability has not yet been fully investigated. Bohnhoff [27] proposed a semi-permeable membrane mechanism that underlies bentonite resistance; Ejezie [28] contended that polyacrylamide blocks the pores between sand grains; Katsumi [16] postulated that swelling was the cause of the low hydraulic conductivity of bentonite materials; and Yu [29] claimed that polymer-modified bentonite contains minute cavity structures that lengthen the percolation path, decreasing the material’s permeability.
Bentonite has significant research value in wastewater treatment [30,31] due to its multi-layer structure, high specific surface area, and exchangeable interlayer cations, which may efficiently adsorb organic contaminants [32,33,34] and heavy metal ions [35]. However, the adsorption capacity of raw bentonite is limited, and can be increased via polymer modification [36]. Currently, the principal use of quaternary ammonium cationic surfactants is in the cation exchange modification of bentonite [37]. At a phenol concentration of 200 mg/L, He [38] discovered that modified bentonite with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) could achieve phenol adsorption of 10.1 mg/g. According to Meng [39], adding a quaternary ammonium surfactant to modified bentonite enhanced its ability to adsorb methylene blue from 60% to 95%. However, bentonite may become hydrophobic and have a reduced ability to adsorb metal ions if quaternary ammonium surfactants are present [40]. Liu [41,42] found that modified bentonite with amphoteric surfactants was effective at adsorbing bisphenol A, Pb2+, and Cd2+. This was probably due to the carboxyl groups (−COO−) and positively charged groups (−N+) that were present in the amphoteric surfactants, which make it simpler to adsorb metal ions and organic contaminants [43,44,45].
As sanitary landfills evolve, the depth of the landfill steadily deepens, the water pressure of the leachate increases and the demands on the impermeable layer are raised. This study examined the impermeability of a PBT–sand mixture (PBTS) and the composited-modification bentonite’s (PBT) adsorption capability after being treated with sodium polyacrylate and betaine. Additionally, the osmotic pressure mechanism was proposed as an impermeability mechanism. In a sand–sand constrained space, the colloidal osmotic pressure of PBTS determined the water pressure it could resist. The findings showed that the osmotic pressure of the PBT colloid increased with increasing SPA concentration, and that PBTS’s resistance to permeability and external water pressure both improved. However, the hydraulic conductivity of PBTS increased and the resistance to permeability decreased when the water pressure was greater than the osmotic pressure of the PBT colloidal. Additionally, the PBT showed effective adsorption properties for phenol, heavy metal ions, and methylene blue.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Materials

Natural bentonite (OB) came from India, an earth-yellow powder with a water content of 8%, particle size of 0.075 mm, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 67.1 mmol/100 g; the main composition is shown in Table 1. The molecular weight of sodium polyacrylate (SPA) was 5 million (500 w), 10 million (1000 w), 15 million (1500 w), 20 million (2000 w), and 25 million (2500 w), from industrial-level products. Betaine was analytically pure; the fineness of the sand was 30 mesh; and the experimental water was deionized water.

2.2. Preparation of Polymer-Modified Bentonite

A total of 1.5 g (3% of bentonite mass) sodium polyacrylate (SPA) dissolved in 300 mL deionized water at 70 °C and 50 g bentonite dissolved in 1000 mL deionized water were stirred for 2 h. The bentonite solution was evenly dispersed and then added to the sodium polyacrylate solution, stirred for 1h, dried at 100 °C, ground, and passed through a 200 mesh sieve, and the sample was named PB. Then, 2.5 g (5% of the bentonite mass) betaine was dissolved in 100 mL deionized water, added to the dispersed bentonite solution, and stirred for 1h, and then sodium polyacrylate solution was added, stirred for 1h, dried at 100 °C, ground, and passed through a 200 mesh sieve, and the sample was named PBT. The bentonite was modified only with betaine, and named BT. The different contents and different betaine content of bentonite were named PxBTy; x was the content of SPA, and y was the content of betaine. The different molecular weights of the SPA composite modified with betaine were named as P500wBT, P1000wBT, P1500wBT, P2000wBT, and P2500wBT.

2.3. Material Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out using a Panaco Empyrean diffractometer from the Netherlands at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu (λ = 1.5406), and scans were recorded between 4° and 40° in 0.1° steps at a rate of 2 °/min. The particle size distribution of the bentonite colloids was measured using a laser particle size analyzer, Master Sizer 2000, Malvern, UK. FTIR was used to test the changes in bentonite before and after modification with the Therno Nicolet Nexus smart Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, USA, with a measured spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1 and an accuracy of 0.01 cm−1. The microscopic morphology of the OB, PB, and PBT was characterized using a JSM-7500F SEM. The zetapotential of OB, PB, and PBT was tested.

2.4. Free Swell Index

The free swell index (FSI) test was conducted according to the ASTM D5890 standard method. Add 90mL of deionized water to a 100 mL measuring cylinder, take 2 g dried OB, PB and PBT, add about 0.1 g or so to the cylinder each time, leave an interval of at least 10 min, add water to 100 mL after all the additions. The free swell index of bentonite (mL/2 g) was measured after 24 h.

2.5. Hydraulic Conductivity

A total of 16 g of OB and PBT mixed with 64 g of sand, were added to 7–9 g of deionized water, and water was slowly sprayed into the sand mixture. Then, under 10 MPa pressure, they were pressed into a specimen with a height of 10 mm and a diameter of 70 mm, with a density of about 2.2 g/cm3. The hydraulic conductivity was measured with a TST-55 permeameter, controlling the water pressure from 20 kPa in increments of 30 kPa to 200 kPa. The hydraulic conductivity was calculated as follows:
  k = a × L 2 × A × Δ t ln ( Δ h 1 Δ h 2 )
where k is the hydraulic conductivity (m/s), a is the cross-sectional area of the PBTS specimen m2; L is the height of the PBTS specimen (m); A is the water passage area of the sample (cm2); Δt is the time interval(s); Δ h 1 is the head loss across the permeameter/specimen at the start time of the permeation trial (m); and Δ h 2 is the head loss across the permeameter/specimen at the end time of the permeation trial (m).

2.6. Colloidal Osmotic Pressure

PBT and OB were dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water to prepare colloidal solutions with concentrations of 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 55 g/L. The osmotic molar concentrations of bentonite colloids were measured using a German GONOTEC freezing point osmotic pressure meter, Osmomat030 3000.

2.7. Adsorption Experiments

2.7.1. Phenol Adsorption Experiments

OB and PBT were dissolved in 100 mL of phenol solution with a solution concentration of 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg/L, shaken at 150 r/min for 3 h. The supernatant was removed and centrifuged at 7500 r/min for 15 min and passed through a 0.45 μm filter membrane, and the absorbance of the filtrate at 271 nm was measured.

2.7.2. Methylene Blue Adsorption Experiments

OB and PBT were dissolved in 50 mL of methylene blue solution with a solution concentration of 200 mg/L, respectively, shaken at 25 °C at 150 r/min for 3 h, the supernatant taken, and the absorbance measured at 664 nm using a UV spectrophotometer.

2.7.3. Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption Experiments

OB and PBT were dissolved in 100 mL of Pb2+, Cd2+, Hg+ ion solution with a solution concentration of 200 mg/L, shaken at 25 °C with 150 r/min for 3 h, the supernatant taken, centrifuged at 7500 r/min for 15 min, passed through a 0.45 μm filter membrane, and the metal ions in the filtrate measured using flame method atomic absorption spectroscopy.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization

XRD was used to analyze the structures of OB, PB, PBT, and BT. The results are shown in Figure 1a. The d001 of PBT was reduced from 1.451 nm to 1.223 nm as compared to OB, which contributed to the quaternary amino via ion exchange in betaine. The bentonite layer distance of d001 was not significantly affected by a betaine content above 5% (Figure S1). The particle sizes of OB, PB, and PBT dispersed in water are shown in Figure 1b. PBT displayed nanodispersibility after modification, with the particle size dropping from 203 nm for OB to 106 nm, due to the intercalation of betaine. The IR of bentonite is shown in Figure 1c, where the main spectral bands of bentonite are 3623 cm−1, attributed to the stretching vibration of montmorillonite structural hydroxyl −OH, 3436 cm−1, and 1636 cm−1, mainly due to the stretching vibration of an interlayer water molecule −OH and bending vibration of −OH, 1421 cm−1 attributed to the stretching vibration and bending vibration of C-H, 1034 cm−1 and 797 cm−1 attributed to the stretching vibration and bending vibration of Si-O, and 876 cm−1 attributed to the bending vibration of montmorillonite structural hydroxyl −OH. In particular, the peak at 1564 cm−1 was the stretching vibration of acrylate (−COO−) on both PB and PBT, and the peak at 1339 cm−1 was the stretching vibration of C-N on PBT.

3.2. Free Swell Index

The higher the FSI of bentonite, the lower its hydraulic conductivity [22]. The FSI values of OB, P3%B (3%SPA) and P3%BT5% (3% SPA and 5% betaine) are shown in Figure 2a. As the SPA molecular weight increased, the FSI gradually rose, and betaine caused the FSI to rise even higher. The FSI of PBT5% (5% betaine) is shown in Figure 2b; the higher the content of SPA, the more significantly the FSI increased. The FSI of P3%&2000wBT (3% SPA (2000 w, molecular weight)) is shown in Figure 2c, where the FSI increased with the increased betaine content, with no further increase beyond 5%. Figure 2d shows that following the SPA treatment, the zetapotential of PBT increased and its stability was improved; the stability increased with increasing SPA content. The zetapotential continued to rise following SPA and betaine compound modification, and stability improved with increasing betaine content.

3.3. Hydraulic Conductivity

The impermeability of PBTS combined with PBT and sand in various ratios was examined. Based on the results of the FSI experiment, PBT was made by modifying 5% betaine and SPA with various molecular weights and contents. The hydraulic conductivity of P2000wBT5%S (SPA (2000 w, molecular weight) and 5% betaine) with a 20:80 PBT–sand ratio at 20–200 kPa water pressure is shown in Figure 3b. The result indicated the P2000wBT5%S with high SPA content had a lower hydraulic conductivity and better impermeability. With the rising water pressure, the hydraulic conductivity of P2000wBT5%S with varied SPA contents first fell and then rose. The critical water pressure Pc was defined as the water pressure at the lowest value of hydraulic conductivity, as shown in Table 2, which rose as the content of SPA increased.
Generally, the hydraulic conductivity of PBTS was influenced by the PBT–sand ratio. As shown in Figure 3c, the hydraulic conductivity of P5%&2000wBT5%S (5% SPA (2000 w, molecular weight) and 5% betaine) decreased first and then increased when the PBT–sand ratio increased, coinciding with earlier studies [46]. The Pc for P5%&2000wBT5%S, with the 15:85 PBT–sand ratio lower than the other PBT–sand ratios of PBTS, due to the low PBT content of the system, did not have a higher colloidal osmotic pressure and had relatively poor impermeability. Additionally, the hydraulic conductivity of P5%BT5%S with different SPA molecular weights and 20:80 PBT–sand ratios is shown in Figure 3d, and decreased when the molecular weight increased; at 170 kPa, the lowest hydraulic conductivity of P2500wBT5%S was 4.62 × 10−12 m/s.

3.4. Colloidal Osmotic Pressure Mechanism

Our experimental results were not well explained by current impermeability mechanisms, so the colloidal osmotic pressure mechanism was proposed. Figure 4a depicts the osmotic pressure of the PBT colloidal solution with various SPA concentrations. The figure showed that the greater the SPA concentration of PBT, the higher the osmotic pressure, which was consistent with the experimental findings. Moreover, the osmotic pressure tended to flatten out and alter almost linearly as the mass concentration increased. Obviously, the impermeable PBT had a highly concentrated colloidal system, in which colloidal osmotic pressure was hardly measured. Thus, the curve of osmotic pressure with high concentration was extrapolated to 100% by the PBT mass content (seen in Figure 4d). The intercept value gained from extrapolating, shown in Table 2, was called the potential of osmotic pressure (πµ). The πµ could represent the chemical potential of PBT, which was an ability to form osmotic pressure. The test value Pc basically coincided with the πµ, indicating that the ability of PBTS to resist external water pressure depended on the colloidal osmotic pressure in a constrained space. Thus, the colloidal osmotic pressure mechanism was proposed to explain the impermeability of PBTS (shown in Figure 5). When the PBTS was compacted, the sand particles overlapped each other to form a sand–sand constrained space which the PBT filled. When water began to penetrate, the PBT absorbed it and expanded, gradually creating a highly concentrated colloidal system with a comparatively stable colloidal osmotic pressure. Due to the PBT not being able to absorb more water and expand in a constrained space, it was able to resist water penetration. When the external water pressure exceeded the colloid osmotic pressure, the PBT colloid loss and impermeability of PBTS were reduced.

3.5. Adsorption Properties

Domestic waste, industrial wastewater, and mine tailings usually contain organic pollutants and heavy metal ions, but the nanodispersible PBT may have great adsorption performance for harmful substances. In this paper, the organic pollutants and heavy metal ions adsorption performance of OB and PBT were investigated, and the adsorption processes of OB and PBT were described by Langmuir and Freundlich’s isothermal adsorption models and adsorption kinetics [47,48].

3.5.1. Phenol Adsorption

The adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT5% (3% SPA (2000 w, molecular weight) and 5% betaine) for different concentrations of phenol is shown in Figure 6a; it increased as the phenol concentration rose, and reached 150 mg/g. Compared to OB, the phenol adsorption capacity of PBT improved by 289% at a 50 mg/L concentration. It was higher than the 120.4 mg/g reported in previous research for bentonite modified by dodecyldimethyl betaine [49]. The phenol adsorption rate of P3%BT5% with different molecular weights of SPA is shown in Figure 6b, and it could reach more than 90% and up to 99%. When the SPA content increased, as shown in Figure 6c, the phenol adsorption increased up to 111 mg/g. The phenol adsorption increased up to 111 mg/g as the SPA concentration rose, as illustrated in Figure 6c. Figure 6d depicted the P3%&2000wBT’s phenol adsorption capacity with various betaine contents; as the betaine content grew, the phenol adsorption capacity increased up to 102 mg/g. Because of its high surface tension, phenols with low surface tension could not be effectively adsorbed onto OB. After modification, PBT exhibited a higher affinity for phenol. As shown in Figure 7, the phenol adsorption processes of OB and PBT were more consistent with the Freundlich model and with the pseudo-second-order kinetics (Tables S1 and S2).

3.5.2. Methylene Blue Adsorption

The adsorption performance of PBT on organic pollutants using methylene blue as a simulant was investigated. With increasing molecular weight, as shown in Figure 8a,b, the methylene blue adsorption capacity and adsorption rate of P3%BT5% (3% SPA and 5% betaine) both increased from a maximum of 335 mg/g in OB to 464 mg/g, an increase of 38.5%, and from 91.3% of OB to 99.9%, respectively. Figure 8c depicts the methylene blue adsorption capability of P2000wBT5% with varying SPA content, which increased with increasing SPA content. As demonstrated in Figure 8d, the methylene blue adsorption capability of P2000wBT5% increased as the betaine concentration increased. The adsorption process of PBT was via pseudo-second-order kinetics (Figure S2),Table S3.

3.5.3. Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption

As shown in Figure 9a, the Pb2+ adsorption of P2000wBT5% (with 5% betaine and different contents SPA (2000 w, molecular weight)) rose from 128 mg/g in OB to 151 mg/g with increasing SPA concentration. Additionally, this was similar to the 150 mg/g reported in previous research for bentonite modified by sodium polyacrylate [50]. With betaine content increasing, as shown in Figure 9b, the adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT increased. The adsorption process of P3%BT5% was pseudo-second-order kinetic (Figure S3),Table S4). In fact, the content of heavy metal ions in domestic waste was low, and the adsorption rate of PBT on heavy metal ions at low concentrations (20 mg/L) could be investigated. Figure 9c depicted the Pb2+, Cd2+, and Hg+ adsorption rates of OB and PBT with various SPA molecular weights. When compared to OB, all of the Pb2+ adsorption rates of PBT with different SPA molecular weights increased by 12%. The Cd2+ adsorption rates of P3%BT5% at various molecular weights were comparable to those of Pb2+, which increased by 10% and exceeded 99%; however, the Hg+ adsorption rates of P3%BT5% at various molecular weights of SPA increased with increasing molecular weight, reaching a maximum of 95.7% and an increase of 35% over OB. The heavy metal ions adsorption capacity of PBT was enhanced by electrostatic adsorption, increased adsorption sites and complexation of the polymer with metal ions, and basically the complete adsorption of heavy metal ions at low concentrations, which could effectively remove trace contents of heavy metal ions from the waste filtrate.
PBT had good adsorption capabilities for both organic contaminants and heavy metal ions, contrasted with quaternary ammonium salt modifications [43]. This was primarily due to the complex modification of the amphoteric surfactant betaine with SPA, which improved the hydrophilicity and dispersibility of the bentonite while increasing the number of adsorption sites.

4. Conclusions

In this study, bentonite was treated with SPA and betaine to reduce the particle size from 203 nm to 106 nm and achieve nanoscale dispersion. The swelling performance of PBT was improved, and the zetapotential indicated that the stability of PBT was improved. The PBTS impermeability was investigated from the standpoint of osmotic pressure, and the colloidal osmotic pressure mechanism was proposed to explain the PBTS impermeability process. When the colloidal osmotic pressure of PBT increased, its permeability coefficient decreased, its impermeability improved, and its resistance to external water pressure increased. The permeability coefficient of PBTS could be lowered to 4.62 × 10−12 m/s after modification. PBT was also effective in absorbing organic pollutants and heavy metal ions. The phenol adsorption capacity and adsorption rate of PBT went up to 150 mg/g and 99.36%, respectively; the methylene blue adsorption capacity and adsorption rate of PBT went up to 464 mg/g and 99.91%, respectively; the Pb2+ adsorption capacity went up to 151 mg/g; and the Pb2+, Cd2+, Hg+ adsorption rate of PBT in low concentrations went up to 99.89%, 99.9%, and 95.7%, respectively. Overall, this work could provide strong technical support for future developments in the field of impermeability and the removal of hazardous substances (organic and heavy metals).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13121840/s1, Figure S1. XRD pattern of PBT with different betaine content; Table S1. Parameters for Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for the adsorption of phenol on OB, PBT; Table S2. Adsorption kinetics of phenol on OB, PBT; Figure S2. Adsorption kinetics of methylene blue on PBT; Table S3. Ad-sorption kinetics of methylene blue on PBT; Figure S3. Adsorption kinetics of lead ions on PBT; Table S4. Adsorption kinetics of lead ions on PBT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. (Chaocan Zhang); Validation, M.T.; Investigation, X.W., C.Z. (Chunyang Zhang), L.W. and W.C.; Writing–original draft, X.W. and D.G.; Writing–review & editing, C.Z. (Chaocan Zhang); Supervision, C.Z. (Chaocan Zhang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WHUT:2021III002) and supported by the Rightway Environmental Research Institute (WHUT:20211h0142).

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors who have contributed or assisted in any way in this work are listed in the manuscript and the contributing authors declare no conflict of interests. All the funding sources of the entire project have been mentioned properly.

References

  1. Wang, S.; Lu, B.; Zhu, W. Effect of Minerals on the Threshold of Compacted Clay Material Liners and Service Life of Barriers in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Acta Geotech. 2023, 18, 1025–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tian, K.; Likos, W.J.; Benson, C.H. Polymer Elution and Hydraulic Conductivity of Bentonite–Polymer Composite Geosynthetic Clay Liners. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2019, 145, 04019071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Srinivasan, R. Advances in Application of Natural Clay and Its Composites in Removal of Biological, Organic, and Inorganic Contaminants from Drinking Water. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2011, 2011, 872531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Borah, D.; Nath, H.; Saikia, H. Modification of Bentonite Clay & Its Applications: A Review. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 42, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Shao, D.; Li, Y.; Xu, Z.; Cheng, C.; Asiri, A.M.; Marwani, H.M.; Hu, S. Adsorption of U(VI) on Bentonite in Simulation Environmental Conditions. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 242, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, W.; Lan, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Lin, D.; Yang, K. Nonlinear Sorption of Phenols and Anilines by Organobentonites: Nonlinear Partition and Space Limitation for Partitioning. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Quan, X.; Yu, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y. Efficient Mineralization of Perfluorooctanoate by Electro-Fenton with H2O2 Electro-Generated on Hierarchically Porous Carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 13528–13533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miranda-García, N.; Suárez, S.; Sánchez, B.; Coronado, J.M.; Malato, S.; Maldonado, M.I. Photocatalytic Degradation of Emerging Contaminants in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents Using Immobilized TiO2 in a Solar Pilot Plant. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 103, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Wang, C.; Jin, Y.; Qiu, J.; Hua, C.; Cao, Y. Synthesis of Amino-Functionalized Bentonite/CoFe2O4@MnO2 Magnetic Recoverable Nanoparticles for Aqueous Cd2+ Removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mao, M.; Yan, T.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L.; Zhang, D. Selective Capacitive Removal of Pb2+ from Wastewater over Redox-Active Electrodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kolluru, V.; Pal, D.; Papu John, A.M.S.; Ankem, M.K.; Freedman, J.H.; Damodaran, C. Induction of Plac8 Promotes Pro-Survival Function of Autophagy in Cadmium-Induced Prostate Carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett. 2017, 408, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, X.; Fernandes, J.; Jones, D.P.; Go, Y.-M. Cadmium Stimulates Myofibroblast Differentiation and Mouse Lung Fibrosis. Toxicology 2017, 383, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shi, L.; Cao, H.; Luo, J.; Liu, P.; Wang, T.; Hu, G.; Zhang, C. Effects of Molybdenum and Cadmium on the Oxidative Damage and Kidney Apoptosis in Duck. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Özçoban, M.Ş.; Acarer, S.; Tüfekci, N. Effect of Solid Waste Landfill Leachate Contaminants on Hydraulic Conductivity of Landfill Liners. Water Sci. Technol. 2022, 85, 1581–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xie, H.; Chen, Y.; Lou, Z. An Analytical Solution to Contaminant Transport through Composite Liners with Geomembrane Defects. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2010, 53, 1424–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Katsumi, T.; Ishimori, H.; Onikata, M.; Fukagawa, R. Long-Term Barrier Performance of Modified Bentonite Materials against Sodium and Calcium Permeant Solutions. Geotext. Geomembr. 2008, 26, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salemi, N.; Abtahi, S.M.; Rowshanzamir, M.A.; Hejazi, S.M. Improving Hydraulic Performance and Durability of Sandwich Clay Liner Using Super-Absorbent Polymer. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 2019, 21, 1055–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cui, Q.; Chen, B. Review of Polymer-Amended Bentonite: Categories, Mechanism, Modification Processes and Application in Barriers for Isolating Contaminants. Appl. Clay Sci. 2023, 235, 106869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kolstad, D.C.; Benson, C.H.; Edil, T.B. Hydraulic Conductivity and Swell of Nonprehydrated Geosynthetic Clay Liners Permeated with Multispecies Inorganic Solutions. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2004, 130, 1236–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jo, H.Y.; Katsumi, T.; Benson, C.H.; Edil, T.B. Hydraulic Conductivity and Swelling of Nonprehydrated GCLs Permeated with Single-Species Salt Solutions. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2001, 127, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, J.-K.; Xia, L.-X.; Yang, Y.-X.; Dina, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhan, L.-T.; Chen, Y.-M.; Bate, B. Polymer-Modified Bentonites with Low Hydraulic Conductivity and Improved Chemical Compatibility as Barriers for Cu2+ Containment. Acta. Geotech. 2022, 18, 1629–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, C.; Liao, R.; Cai, X.; Yu, X. Sodium Polyacrylate Modification Method to Improve the Permeant Performance of Bentonite in Chemical Resistance. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 213, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Scalia, J.; Benson, C.H.; Bohnhoff, G.L.; Edil, T.B.; Shackelford, C.D. Long-Term Hydraulic Conductivity of a Bentonite-Polymer Composite Permeated with Aggressive Inorganic Solutions. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2014, 140, 04013025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ozhan, H.O. Determination of Mechanical and Hydraulic Properties of Polyacrylamide-Added Bentonite-Sand Mixtures. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021, 80, 2557–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.; Wei, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Peng, S. Study on Preparation of Polymer-Modified Bentonite and Sand Mixtures Based on Osmotic Pressure Principle. Materials 2022, 15, 3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lu, T.-H.; Sun, W.-J.; Liu, K.; Tan, Y.-Z. Effect of Sand Particle Size on Hydraulic-Mechanical Behavior of Bentonite-Sand Mixtures. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2022, 26, 3287–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bohnhoff, G.L.; Shackelford, C.D. Improving Membrane Performance via Bentonite Polymer Nanocomposite. Appl. Clay. Sci. 2013, 86, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ejezie, J.O.; Jefferis, S.A.; Lam, C.; Sedighi, M.; Ahmad, S.M. Permeation Behaviour of PHPA Polymer Fluids in Sand. Géotechnique 2021, 71, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, C.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, J.; Liao, R.; Deng, Y. Experimental Study on the Permeability and Self-Healing Capacity of Geosynthetic Clay Liners in Heavy Metal Solutions. Geotext. Geomembr. 2021, 49, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Uddin, M.K. A Review on the Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Clay Minerals, with Special Focus on the Past Decade. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 438–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhar, A.K.; Himu, H.A.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Mostufa, M.G.; Parvin, F. Insights on Applications of Bentonite Clays for the Removal of Dyes and Heavy Metals from Wastewater: A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 5440–5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hank, D.; Azi, Z.; Ait Hocine, S.; Chaalal, O.; Hellal, A. Optimization of Phenol Adsorption onto Bentonite by Factorial Design Methodology. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2256–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. My Linh, N.L.; Duong, T.; Van Duc, H.; Thi Anh Thu, N.; Khac Lieu, P.; Van Hung, N.; Hoa, L.T.; Quang Khieu, D. Phenol Red Adsorption from Aqueous Solution on the Modified Bentonite. J. Chem. 2020, 2020, 1504805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Majdan, M.; Sabah, E.; Bujacka, M.; Pikus, S.; Płaska, A.-G. Spectral and Equillibrium Properties of Phenol–HDTMA- and Phenol–BDMHDA-Bentonite as a Response to the Molecular Arrangements of Surfactant Cations. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 938, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yadav, V.B.; Gadi, R.; Kalra, S. Clay Based Nanocomposites for Removal of Heavy Metals from Water: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 803–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Al Kausor, M.; Sen Gupta, S.; Bhattacharyya, K.G.; Chakrabortty, D. Montmorillonite and Modified Montmorillonite as Adsorbents for Removal of Water Soluble Organic Dyes: A Review on Current Status of the Art. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 143, 109686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ning, P.; Tian, S. Adsorption Behavior of Phenol by Reversible Surfactant-Modified Montmorillonite: Mechanism, Thermodynamics, and Regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, H.; Xu, E.; Qiu, Z.; Wu, T.; Wang, S.; Lu, Y.; Chen, G. Phenol Adsorption Mechanism of Organically Modified Bentonite and Its Microstructural Changes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meng, B.; Guo, Q.; Men, X.; Ren, S.; Jin, W.; Shen, B. Modified Bentonite by Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane and Quaternary Ammonium Salt and Adsorption Characteristics for Dye. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2020, 24, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Andini, S.; Cioffi, R.; Montagnaro, F.; Pisciotta, F.; Santoro, L. Simultaneous Adsorption of Chlorophenol and Heavy Metal Ions on Organophilic Bentonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, C.; Wu, P.; Zhu, Y.; Tran, L. Simultaneous Adsorption of Cd2+ and BPA on Amphoteric Surfactant Activated Montmorillonite. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 1026–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, C.; Wu, P.; Tran, L.; Zhu, N.; Dang, Z. Organo-Montmorillonites for Efficient and Rapid Water Remediation: Sequential and Simultaneous Adsorption of Lead and Bisphenol A. Environ. Chem. 2018, 15, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, W.B.; Liu, Z.; Meng, Z.F.; Ren, S.; Xu, S.E.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.Y. Composite Modification Mechanism of Cationic Modifier to Amphoteric Modified Kaolin and Its Effects on Surface Characteristics. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 2639–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, W.; Meng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q.; Xu, S. Chromium (VI) Adsorption Characteristics of Bentonite Under Different Modification Patterns. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2016, 25, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, X.; Li, W.; Deng, H.; Li, T.; Wang, D. Enhanced Adsorption of Cu2+ on Purple Soil by Amphoteric-Modified Materials. DWT 2020, 196, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heidarzadeh, N.; Parhizi, P. Improving the Permeability and Adsorption of Phenol by Organophilic Clay in Clay Liners. Environ. Eng. Res. 2019, 25, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Gong, D.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Sheng, Y.; Peng, S. Respiratory Adsorption of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater by Superhydrophobic Phenolic Xerogels. Polymers 2022, 14, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Taha, A.A.; Shreadah, M.A.; Ahmed, A.M.; Heiba, H.F. Multi-Component Adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), and Ni(II) onto Egyptian Na-Activated Bentonite; Equilibrium, Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Application for Seawater Desalination. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1166–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, X.; Meng, Z.; Cao, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Sun, H.; Sun, X.; Li, W. Effect of Double Carbon Chains on Enhanced Removal of Phenol from Wastewater by Amphoteric-Gemini Complex-Modified Bentonite. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 320, 121088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, Y.; Liao, R.; Yu, C.; Yu, X. Sorption of Pb(II) on Sodium Polyacrylate Modified Bentonite. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 3274–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of OB, PB, PBT, and BT; (b) PSD patterns of OB, PB, and PBT; (c) IR patterns of OB, PB, and PBT.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of OB, PB, PBT, and BT; (b) PSD patterns of OB, PB, and PBT; (c) IR patterns of OB, PB, and PBT.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g001
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The FSI of OB, P3%B, and P3%BT5% with different molecular weights of SPA; (b) the FSI of PBT5% with different SPA (2000 w) content; (c) the FSI of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine content; and (d) the zetapotential of OB and PB with different SPA contents and PBT with different SPA and betaine contents.
Figure 2. (a) The FSI of OB, P3%B, and P3%BT5% with different molecular weights of SPA; (b) the FSI of PBT5% with different SPA (2000 w) content; (c) the FSI of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine content; and (d) the zetapotential of OB and PB with different SPA contents and PBT with different SPA and betaine contents.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g002
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Hydraulic conductivity of OBS; (b) hydraulic conductivity of P2000wBT5%S with different SPA contents; (c) the hydraulic conductivity with different PBT–sand ratios for P5%&2000wBT5%S; and (d) the hydraulic conductivity with different SPA molecular weights for P5%BT5%S.
Figure 3. (a) Hydraulic conductivity of OBS; (b) hydraulic conductivity of P2000wBT5%S with different SPA contents; (c) the hydraulic conductivity with different PBT–sand ratios for P5%&2000wBT5%S; and (d) the hydraulic conductivity with different SPA molecular weights for P5%BT5%S.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g003
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Osmotic pressure of OB, P1%BT, P3%BT, and P5%BT colloidal at different mass concentrations; (b) linear extrapolation of osmotic pressure based on bentonite mass content.
Figure 4. (a) Osmotic pressure of OB, P1%BT, P3%BT, and P5%BT colloidal at different mass concentrations; (b) linear extrapolation of osmotic pressure based on bentonite mass content.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g004
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g005 550
Figure 5. Colloidal osmotic pressure mechanism of PBTS.
Figure 5. Colloidal osmotic pressure mechanism of PBTS.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g005
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The phenol adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT5% with different phenol concentrations; (b) the phenol absorption capacity of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (c) the phenol adsorption of P2000wBT5% with different SPA contents; and (d) the phenol adsorption of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine contents.
Figure 6. (a) The phenol adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT5% with different phenol concentrations; (b) the phenol absorption capacity of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (c) the phenol adsorption of P2000wBT5% with different SPA contents; and (d) the phenol adsorption of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine contents.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g006
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) OB isothermal adsorption model; (b) PBT isothermal adsorption model; (c) the pseudo-first-order kinetics of OB and PBT; and (d) the pseudo-second-order kinetics of OB and PBT.
Figure 7. (a) OB isothermal adsorption model; (b) PBT isothermal adsorption model; (c) the pseudo-first-order kinetics of OB and PBT; and (d) the pseudo-second-order kinetics of OB and PBT.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g007
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) The methylene blue adsorption capacity of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (b) the methylene blue adsorption rate of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (c) the methylene blue adsorption capacity of P2000 wBT5% with different SPA contents; and (d) the methylene blue adsorption capacity of P2000wBT5% with different betaine contents.
Figure 8. (a) The methylene blue adsorption capacity of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (b) the methylene blue adsorption rate of P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights; (c) the methylene blue adsorption capacity of P2000 wBT5% with different SPA contents; and (d) the methylene blue adsorption capacity of P2000wBT5% with different betaine contents.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g008
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) The Pb2+ adsorption capacity of P2000wBT5% with different SPA contents; (b) the Pb2+ adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine contents; and (c) the Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg+ adsorption rates of OB and P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights.
Figure 9. (a) The Pb2+ adsorption capacity of P2000wBT5% with different SPA contents; (b) the Pb2+ adsorption capacity of P3%&2000wBT with different betaine contents; and (c) the Pb2+, Cd2+ and Hg+ adsorption rates of OB and P3%BT5% with different SPA molecular weights.
Nanomaterials 13 01840 g009
Table
Table 1. Main components of bentonite (%mass).
Table 1. Main components of bentonite (%mass).
MontmorilloniteKaoliniteQuartzHalloysite
63%19%14%3%
Table
Table 2. Pc, πµ with various SPA contents (kPa).
Table 2. Pc, πµ with various SPA contents (kPa).
0%1%3%5%
Pc80110140170
πµ80.6110.5137170.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, X.; Zhang, C.; Gong, D.; Tu, M.; Wu, L.; Chen, W.; Zhang, C. A Study on the Impermeability of Nanodispersible Modified Bentonite Based on Colloidal Osmotic Pressure Mechanisms and the Adsorption of Harmful Substances. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121840

AMA Style

Wei X, Zhang C, Gong D, Tu M, Wu L, Chen W, Zhang C. A Study on the Impermeability of Nanodispersible Modified Bentonite Based on Colloidal Osmotic Pressure Mechanisms and the Adsorption of Harmful Substances. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(12):1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Xi, Chunyang Zhang, Depeng Gong, Mengdong Tu, Lili Wu, Wanyu Chen, and Chaocan Zhang. 2023. "A Study on the Impermeability of Nanodispersible Modified Bentonite Based on Colloidal Osmotic Pressure Mechanisms and the Adsorption of Harmful Substances" Nanomaterials 13, no. 12: 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121840

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop