Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Adding Chitosan Nanoparticles on Biofilm Formation, Cytotoxicity, and Certain Physical and Mechanical Aspects of Directly Printed Orthodontic Clear Aligners
Previous Article in Journal
Polymer-Based Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems for Purines of Established Importance in Medicine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 19
10.3390/nano13192648
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Critical Electrospinning Parameters for Synthesis Control of Stabilized Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers

by
Juan Emmanuel Ruiz Rocha
1,2,
Karla Rebeca Moreno Tovar
1,
Ricardo Navarro Mendoza
1,
Silvia Gutiérrez Granados
1,
Sara Cavaliere
3,
Domitille Giaume
2,
Philippe Barboux
2 and
Jesús Salvador Jaime Ferrer
4,*
1
Departamento de Química, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato, Pueblito de Rocha s/n, Guanajuato 36040, Mexico
2
Chimie ParisTech, PSL University, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 75005 Paris, France
3
ICGM, University Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, CEDEX 5, 34095 Montpellier, France
4
CIATEC A.C., Centro de Innovación Aplicada en Tecnología Competitiva, Omega 201, Industrial Delta, GTO, León 37545, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(19), 2648; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192648
Submission received: 4 August 2023 / Revised: 17 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers are widely used as precursors in the manufacture of high-conducting and mechanically resistant carbon fibers. The modulation of such fibers is carried out through electrospinning. In this work, we show the production and control of the morphology of nanometric-range PAN fibers for their potential use as precursors for high-electrical-conductivity carbon fibers. PAN samples dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) were prepared at 6, 10, and 12% w/w, at 15 and 25 kV. The impact of the rotation of the collector drum at 100, 300, and 500 RPM was also studied. It was found that the percentage of PAN in the solution proportionally affects the diameter of the fibers and that the preparation potential affects the morphology. The rotation speed, when increased, decreases the diameter, and it has a negative impact on the morphology. Fibers prepared with 6% w/w at 15 kV and 500 RPM show 90 nm diameters, the smallest diameter of all the samples.

1. Introduction

Carbon fiber formation was first observed in the 1950s during the pyrolysis of hydrocarbons [1]. However, it was not until the 1990s that Iijima et al. [2] discovered cylindrical carbon structures with diameters in the range of 10–500 nanometers, hence the name “carbon nanofibers” (CNFs) [3]. These structures were distinct from other flat or spherical carbon-based materials [4]. Research on CNFs has rapidly evolved, focusing on understanding their properties and developing methods to synthetize them.
Such key properties include high strength and stiffness, high surface area, high electrical conductivity, chemical and thermal stability, low density, and biocompatibility [5]. Due to these properties, CNFs have potential applications in energy storage, catalysis, and sensors, and particularly in supercapacitors, lithium-ion batteries, and fuel cells [6,7,8]. Some examples reported by Poudel et al. include a study about assembling zinc–cobalt-hydroxide/ternary sulfide heterostructure on three-dimensional hollow porous CNFs [9]. Another study concerns confined zinc–magnesium–aluminum layered double hydroxide nanosheets on hollow porous CNFs with a capacitance of 3437 F cm−2 [10]. For environmental purposes, these were applied for the adsorption of the heavy metal ions Cr (VI) and Pb (II) using Co-Al layered double hydroxide loaded with hematite (α-Fe2O3) @ 3D porous CNF, reporting adsorptions of 400.40 mg g−1 and 426.76 mg g−1, respectively [11]. Carbon nanofibers issued by electrospinning can also be used as self-supported electrodes to be used directly in fuel cell cathodes [12].
The structure of CNFs, including their diameter, length, and degree of crystallinity, affects their properties [13]. CNFs with a smaller diameter have higher surface area-to-volume ratios and greater reactivity [14]. Longer CNFs have higher mechanical strength. Highly crystalline CNFs display better thermal and electrical conductivity [15,16].The structure of CNFs is determined by the synthesis method and the polymer used as a carbon source [17]. Common synthesis methods include chemical vapor deposition, electrospinning, arc discharge, laser ablation, and template-assisted synthesis [18].
The first report on the use of electrospinning to produce PAN nanofibers was published by Reneker and Chun in 1996 [19]; subsequently, this technique was widely used, especially with PAN as a precursor [20,21,22,23]. The polymer molecular weight, solution concentration, voltage, flow rate, spinneret-collector distance, and environmental factors influence the electrospinning process and the resulting fiber properties [24,25,26]. Other electrospun nanofiber applications are in environmental toxicant sensors or personal healthcare devices through conjugated copolymers (CCP) that can be used for sensing various environments, such as metal ions, pH, temperature, humidity, etc. [27]. Another example is an antiviral agent for personal protective equipment such as facemasks and surgical gowns composed by nanocomposites such as PAN polymer, ZnO nanoparticles, and Viroblock [28].
DMF is the most commonly used solvent to dissolve and electrospin PAN due to its good solubility, low viscosity, good conductivity, high boiling point, and availability [29]. The molecular weight of PAN can affect the fiber properties. Low-molecular-weight PAN may produce nanofibers with lower mechanical strength and thermal stability [30]. On the other hand, higher-molecular-weight PAN can produce nanofibers with better mechanical properties and improved thermal stability [31]. Polymeric solution concentration influences fiber formation; low concentrations result in discontinuous fibers and high concentrations in thick fibers [32]. Voltage to electrospin PAN is typically between 10 and 30 kV [33].
An optimal flow rate to electrospin PAN nanofibers lies in the range of 0.1–2 mL h−1 and varies depending on the specific processing parameters. At lower flow rates, the electrostatic force generated may not be sufficient to pull the polymer solution from the tip of the spinneret, resulting in a low production rate [34]. Spinneret-collector distance influences fiber morphology and alignment, typically in the range of 10–30 cm [35,36]. The rotation speed of the collector drum affects nanofiber properties. High speeds favor thin and aligned fibers. Temperature and humidity conditions during electrospinning can also impact the process and fiber properties [37], affecting solution viscosity and flow rate, and solvent evaporation and fiber distribution [32], respectively.
To enhance thermal stability and mechanical strength to allow further processing into CNF, PAN nanofibers must undergo a thermal treatment at temperatures between 250 and 270 °C, causing oxidation and cyclization [36,38]. The main reaction is an oxidation of the nitrile groups. The formation of polar functional groups in the fibers and of covalent bonds between adjacent nitrile groups in the polymer chains derive into the formation of ladder-like structures [39,40]. Carbonization in an inert gas atmosphere results in carbon nanofibers with tailored properties [41,42].
In summary, the synthesis method of CNFs plays a crucial role in determining their unique properties and promising potential uses. As a result, the choice of preparation conditions for the precursor material must be highly controlled.

2. Materials and Methods

PAN (Mw ≈ 150,000 g mol−1), from Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, was used as the polymer fiber precursor. As a solvent, DMF (≥99.8%), ACS Karal, was used with ρ = 0.98 g mL−1, and a boiling point of 153 °C.

2.1. PAN Fiber Preparation

PAN was dissolved in DMF in solutions of 6, 10, 12% w/w concentrations and stirred overnight at 25 °C. Using Inovenso´s NE100 electrospinning equipment, the solution was introduced into a syringe in a pump system at a rate of 0.1 mL h−1. The flow variations were not studied in this article since, according to the literature, they are not significant [43]. The solution was exposed to a high voltage of 15 and 25 kV, with a distance of 15 cm between the needle tip to the solution was projected to the collecting drum. The rotational speeds were 100, 300, and 500 RPM. The PAN nanofibers produced were collected on a sheet of aluminum foil present on the collector. The electrospinning system is illustrated in Figure 1. The as prepared polymeric fiber membrane was brought to a temperature of 250 °C in an oxidative atmosphere (air) with a ramp of 5 °C min−1 [44].

2.2. PAN Fibers Characterization

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were obtained with a Zeiss Sigma (Jena, Germany) HD VP Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM). For the measurement of the fiber diameter, images were taken at 10,000×. Using the Image-J software (version 1.53o) [45], the cross- section of 200 fibers was measured from a total of 5 groups of images from different regions of the sample. To characterize the PAN after the stabilization process, the FT-IR Nicolet™ Is™10 from Thermo Scientific™ (Waltham, MA, USA) was used to perform Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis in a range of 3000–1000 cm−1.
Wettability was measured with contact angle using ultrapure water, employing a sessile drop mode with DataPhysics OCA 15EC. The pH of the employed water was 8.35 ± 0.49 at 25 °C, and its conductivity was 0.203 ± 0.089 μS cm−1. Before the θ w measurement, the fiber cloth was dried for 48 h at 35 °C in a convection oven, and then for another 24 h in a desiccator. Double-sided tape was used to adhere the samples to glass slides. A Hamilton glass syringe with a maximum capacity of 500 μL and a stainless steel needle with an outside diameter of 0.53 ± 0.01 mm were used to deposit the water drops. Each drop had a volume of roughly 3.25 ± 0.18 μL. Angles θ w were measured 166 ms after drop application. Using an elliptical adjustment, the right and left contact angles (given in °) of each drop were determined from the digital image, with an experimental error value of 3°. For reproducibility, ten drops were deposited on various regions on both flanks of the same fiber cloth.
To measure water uptake, the samples were placed in Petri dishes and covered with distilled water for at least 24 h to ensure complete absorption. Once the wet weight of the membranes was taken, the fiber webs were completely dried in a convection oven at 40 °C for 2 h and kept in the desiccator for at least 24 h until they were weighed again. The water uptake was obtained with Equation (1):
W a t e r   u p t a k e   % = w e t   w e i g h t − d r y   w e i g h t d r y   w e i g h t × 100
To measure surface porosity of the nanofiber web, an imaging protocol was carried out using the program Image-J (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The protocol consists of the decomposition of the colors in RGB, selecting the channel with the best contrast out of three. The areas where the fibers appear are selected. The program excludes the darker areas where fibers are absent. In this way, the program provides the area corresponding to the empty zones (porosity). Surface porosity was compare with a gravimetric method proposed by Safari et al. [46,47]. To determine the weight of the enclosed water sample, the absorbed water at the sample surface was swiftly scraped using a paper filter and weighed to prevent evaporation. Equation (2) was used to calculate the porosity of the sample, where Ww is the weight of the sample containing water, Wd is the weight of the dry sample, and W1 is the weight of the sample in water.
P o r o s i t y   % = W w − W d W w − W 1 × 100

3. Results

3.1. Dimensions of PAN Fibers

The diameter distribution of the PAN fibers obtained by electrospinning is represented in the graphic of Figure 2a for different polymer concentrations (voltage 15 kV and drum rotation 100 RPM, fixed). Decreasing the polymer concentration from 12 to 10% w/w reduced the average diameter by almost 50% from 470 nm to 230 nm, as shown in Figure 2b. The impact of the concentration was less important between the concentrations of 10 and 6% w/w, producing a decrease from 270 to 220 nm. There was a tendency for the diminution of fiber diameter with lower percentages, and a better size distribution can also be observed in Figure 2a. The analysis of the effect of the rotation of the drum was continued with the solutions prepared at 6% w/w PAN/DMF.
The fiber´s diameter distribution is represented in the graph of Figure 2c for different drum rotation rates (fixed concentration 6% w/w, fixed voltage 15 kV). The mean fiber diameter is shown as a function of the rotation rate at two voltages (15 kV and 25 kV) at fixed 6% w/w concentration and 500 RPM. At 15 kV, we observed a linear decrease in the diameter, reaching 90 nm. At 25 kV, a decreasing trend was expected. However, due to the decompensation produced by the rotation of the collector, an increase in the diameter of the fibers occurred. In the analysis of fiber diameter, a considerable decrease in diameter was shown when the concentration of PAN/DMF varied. The decrease in diameter was caused by an increase in the collector’s rotation speed, which created a drafting force between the drum collector and the polymer jets, stretching the fiber. There is a relationship between the decrease in the diameter with the appearance of imperfections, which can be controlled by the electrospinning voltage [48].
The effect of the concentration of the polymer in solution on the average fiber size has been extensively studied [48]. This effect is explained by the increase in viscosity relative to concentration. There is an internal resistance in the structure of a polymer thread that has been compressed by an electric field. On the other hand, the increase in the electric field leads to a decrease in the diameter of the Taylor cone, a cone formed between the needle tip and where the filament starts to form (Figure 1). It is shown that at a higher rotational speed of the drum collector, a relation between the tension and concentration parameters appears, which implies an inverse effect for the diameter size.
The drum movement improved the uniformity at the expense of producing defects in the fibers. With the 25 kV voltage, it was possible to obtain a more controlled morphology by increasing the rotation speed. This means that it is possible to reduce the deformities caused by the increase in the rotation speed by increasing the electrospinning voltage, which is discussed further below.

3.2. Morphology of PAN Fibers

It was observed that the PAN fibers presented a significant change in the homogeneity of the diameter through the length of the fiber. For the same concentration of 6% w/w and voltage 15 kV, the fibers obtained at 100 RPM showed slight stretching (Figure 3a). However, the fibers prepared in similar conditions but at 300 RPM (Figure 3b) presented a better diameter homogeneity, which is due to their submission to a higher stretching force. This compensates for the possible effects of speed variation caused by fluctuations in the electric field at higher rotation rates such as 500 RPM (Figure 3c). Many diameter irregularities were observed along each fiber because the drag force produced by the collector generates non-homogeneous stretching areas. In this case, the rotation speed was probably too high and produced excessive stretching. The negative effect of the rotation at 500 RPM can be compensated by increasing the electrospinning voltage up to 25 kV (Figure 3d). This compensation was obtained because by increasing the voltage it is possible to accelerate the flow of the polymer in such a way that there is always a high feeding of fibers matching the fast rotation of the current collector (drum).

3.3. Stabilization Process: Chemical and Morphology Evolution

To determine the dehydrogenation and cyclization degree (Figure 4), FTIR measurements (Figure 5a) were performed. The dehydrogenation process takes place in the tertiary carbon of the PAN chain. The change in the (CH2, CH) curve areas was quantified with Equation (3). The cyclization process takes place between the carbon of the CN and the nitrogen of the CN adjacent to the PAN structure. The change in C ≡ N to C=N intensities in FTIR spectra can be quantified using Equation (4) [49]. Figure 5b shows a fast weight loss at 300 °C, which corresponds to the PAN oxidation processes that result in the carbon ladder structure (Figure 4). This is followed by a steady weight reduction caused by the removal of the CH, NH, and C=N species in the polymer [50].
% c y c l i s a t i o n = I C = N   I C = N   − I C ≡ N   × 100
I n d e x d e s h y d r o g e n a t i o n = A C − H A CH 2
Fibers treated at 250 °C during 2 h exhibited a dehydrogenation of 6.5%, contrary to the 13.4% shown by the 3 h treatment (Table 1). On the other hand, the cyclization degree after 2 h was 63% and 82% after 3 h [44]. This technique has been widely reported in the literature mainly using temperatures above 250 °C [50,51]. Son et al. reported a combined technique assisted by UV irradiation but with 10% less cyclization than the one reported in this work [52]. Kong et al. reported an extensive study on the impact of stabilization time using a thermal technique with similar results of 82% cyclization using higher temperatures [53].
Figure 6a shows the morphology of PAN fibers before the stabilization process. After stabilization at 250 °C for 3 h, the surface of the fibers became smoother (Figure 6b). This effect is caused by the chemical compaction and reticulation of the polymeric network by to the cyclization reaction. On the other hand, the appearance of small pinholes can be seen, most likely due to the release of water vapor during the heat treatment.

3.4. Wettability of PAN Fibers

For a constant rotation rate, an increase in the contact angle from 60° to 90° was observed when the PAN concentration increased from 6% w/w to 12% w/w (Figure 7a). The voltage (15 kV or 25 kV) had no effect. This effect has a linear impact on wettability, so it may not be entirely determined by the diameter of the fibers, which grows exponentially as a function of PAN percentage. However, a compacting effect of the fibers may be involved. On the other hand, the preparation potential did not affect the value of the contact angle. This indicates that the fibers did not present a significant change in their surface in terms of the applied potential. Regarding the effect of the rotation of the current collector (Figure 7b), there was also no appreciable effect on the value of the contact angle, suggesting that the chemical nature of the fibers is not affected. On the other hand, fibers with more hydrophobic characteristics than those reported in the literature have been obtained with 50° more than those reported by Aijaz [43]. Figure 7c shows the contact angles measured on the PAN fibers prepared at 15 kV, 6% w/w, and 100 RPM treated at 250 °C during 2 h and 3 h. Regarding the effect of the stabilization time, the fibers treated for 3 h showed higher contact angles than those treated for 2 h and became hydrophobic with contact angles above 110°. This probably corresponds to the larger cyclization degree of these fibers, confirming that the changes have an important effect on the superficial characteristics, as first observed through the SEM images.

3.5. Water Uptake of PAN Cloth

Regarding to the water uptake, fibers prepared at 10% w/w PAN in solution showed a greater percentage of swelling than the fibers prepared at 12% w/w (Figure 8a). This suggests that the structure and compaction of the fibers have an important effect on the amount of water that the fiber can retain. It can be concluded that the water uptake is inverse to the diameter. The larger the diameter, the less space the material has to swell. The decay in water uptake as a function of the rotation speed was also observed (Figure 8b). The fibers compaction plays an important role in the amount of liquid retained during the water uptake experiments. Fibers with a more compact arrangement are less favored for this purpose than fibers with more disordered arrangement. After a stabilization process at 250 °C for 2 h (Figure 8c), a significant decrease of the water uptake was observed, whereas after stabilization for 3 h, the swelling values corresponded to those observed before the thermal treatment.

3.6. Porosity of PAN Cloth

Porosity studies show that increasing the percentage of PAN in the electrospinning solution and therefore fiber diameter, increases the level of surface porosity of the PAN fiber web before stabilization (Figure 9a). However, this effect does not allow the compaction of the fibers, probably due to a repulsion effect of the fibers during the projection of the threads during electrospinning. It was observed that with a potential of 25 kV, more compact and less porous structures were obtained. This is due to the increase in the tension on the fiber at the time of the electrospinning process, compensating for the repulsion of the fibers by joining them together. Regarding the effect of rotation (Figure 9b), it has been observed that the fibers prepared with 15 kV tension and a percentage of 6% w/w show a decrease in surface porosity with respect to the increase in rotation speed, suggesting that the stretching of the fibers caused by the rotation of the drum helps the fiber compaction. As previously demonstrated, the increase in electrospinning voltage compensates for the rotation effect, increasing fiber surface porosity up to a maximum of 80% at a rotation of 300 RPM. However, above this value of rotation, a decrease in surface porosity was observed, once again resuming the compaction of the fibers. Considering the impact of the stabilization process (Figure 9c), there is no significant change between the samples treated for 2 or 3 h, since the fibers only change their internal structure but not the external one.
To compare the results obtained by image analysis, the gravimetric method was applied (Figure 10), providing a quantitative measure of porosity. It directly calculates the percentage of porosity based on the weight change before and after saturating the material with a fluid. We used both methods in conjunction to gain a more complete understanding of the PAN nanofiber’s porosity characteristics. The differences between each method were maintained within a value of 3% to 5% maximum, which suggests that the results obtained with the previously proposed method can be used in polymeric fibers with similar characteristics. The difference is not significant, because the PAN nanofibers do not have fine pores or irregular pore shapes, which means that the porosity being measured is the porosity between nanofibers, not within each of the nanofibers.

4. Discussion

PAN fibers with around 90 nm diameter were successfully obtained by adjusting the electrospinning parameters. The concentration of PAN in the electrospun solution plays an important role since fibers below 100 nm can be obtained with concentrations below 10% w/w. On the other hand, increasing the speed of rotation allows for diameter reduction, given the stretching of the polymeric fibers during electrospinning as demonstrated in the SEM analysis. The voltage applied between the nozzle and the drum collector also plays a role with a decrease in diameter observed increasing the voltage. However, it is important to match the rotation rate of the drum collector to the voltage of electrospinning.
The drum collector rotation rate mechanically pulls the fibers and the voltage of the electrospinning controls the flow of the polymer solution from the injection tip to the drum. If the matching is not good, heterogeneous diameters or agglomerated particles appear.
The chemical structure and the degree of cyclization during the stabilization process at 250 °C strongly depend on the treatment time. Between 2 h and 3 h, an improvement of 20% in the cyclization process was observed, as well as in the dehydrogenation process. Regarding the morphological changes observed in the fibers, changes can be seen in the surface of the fibers, from rough with some textural irregularities to a more compact and smooth structure.
To allow the greatest contact of effluent with the fiber, the diameter of the fiber should be the smallest. These effects on the surface are given by the formation of ladder links that are formed during the reaction, helping to compact the polymeric structures. Regarding wettability, an increase in the contact angle values is observed as a function of the percentage of PAN. The higher the fiber diameter, the higher the hydrophobicity of the material. It was observed that the rotation of the collector did not have a considerable effect on the wettability of the fibers. The swelling properties of the fibers were considerably affected by the percentage of PAN, showing a maximum level of swelling of 10%. The water uptake decreased to very low values when PAN was electrospun at 12% w/w. The fiber diameter presented an inverse behavior, which suggests that the space occupied by the larger diameter fibers hampers the absorbent properties of the material. In the same way, the compaction of the fibers affects the swelling of the fibers. By increasing the compaction of the fibers, the free spaces remain occupied, thus reducing their absorbing capacity. The porosity of PAN cloth is proportional to the diameter of the fibers. The greater the diameter, the greater the tendency to separate from each other, which increases the porosity.

5. Conclusions

This study focuses on synthesizing and characterizing PAN fibers as high-quality precursors for carbon fibers, potentially used in fuel cell cathodes or metal–air batteries. PAN concentration in the electrospinning solution impacts fiber diameter, with concentrations below 10% w/w yielding diameters less than 100 nm. Increased rotational speed during electrospinning allows better control of fiber shape. The study also examines the effect of a 250 °C stabilization technique on PAN fiber chemical structure, revealing a 20% enhancement with a 3 h treatment. Contact angle values increase with higher PAN percentages, and swelling properties peak at 10% w/w PAN, decreasing at higher concentrations. Greater fiber diameter leads to increased porosity, as fibers separate. Additionally, 90 nm diameter PAN fibers were obtained under 6% w/w, 25 kV, and 500 RPM. Overall, the study highlights the importance of electrospinning settings to produce PAN fibers with suitable properties for use as carbon fiber precursors contributing to the knowledge of nanofiber fabrication for sustainable energy systems.

Author Contributions

J.E.R.R.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing. K.R.M.T.: Investigation, Methodology. R.N.M.: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation. S.C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing. S.G.G.: Resources and Supervision. D.G.: Investigation, Writing—review and editing. P.B.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. J.S.J.F.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the IDEA Gto through the projects IDEAGTO/CONV/207/2022 and IDEAGTO/CONV/092/2021 by the “Programa Valle de la Mentefactura Guanajuato, modalidad mentefactura Tecnológica, submodalidad Conexión Internacional de la Ciencia”.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the SEM images to the Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica del Laboratorio Nacional (LACAPFEM) de la Universidad de Guanajuato.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bacon, R. Growth, Structure, and Properties of Graphite Whiskers. J. Appl. Phys. 1960, 31, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iijima, S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-Shell Carbon Nanotubes of 1-Nm Diameter. Nature 1993, 363, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Jong, K.P.; Geus, J.W. Carbon Nanofibers: Catalytic Synthesis and Applications. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 2000, 42, 481–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, L.; Xie, N.; Zhong, J. Carbon Nanofibers and Their Composites: A Review of Synthesizing, Properties and Applications. Materials 2014, 7, 3919–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yadav, D.; Amini, F.; Ehrmann, A. Recent Advances in Carbon Nanofibers and Their Applications—A Review. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 138, 109963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuge, R.; Tamura, N.; Manako, T.; Nakano, K.; Nakahara, K. High-Rate Charge/Discharge Properties of Li-Ion Battery Using Carbon-Coated Composites of Graphites, Vapor Grown Carbon Fibers, and Carbon Nanohorns. J. Power Sources 2014, 266, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Saleh, M.H.; Sundararaj, U. Review of the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanofiber/Polymer Composites. Compos. A Appl. Sci. 2011, 42, 2126–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Poudel, M.B.; Kim, A.A.; Lohani, P.C.; Yoo, D.J.; Kim, H.J. Assembling Zinc Cobalt Hydroxide/Ternary Sulfides Heterostructure and Iron Oxide Nanorods on Three-Dimensional Hollow Porous Carbon Nanofiber as High Energy Density Hybrid Supercapacitor. J. Energy Storage 2023, 60, 106713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poudel, M.B.; Kim, H.J. Confinement of Zn-Mg-Al-Layered Double Hydroxide and α-Fe2O3 Nanorods on Hollow Porous Carbon Nanofibers: A Free-Standing Electrode for Solid-State Symmetric Supercapacitors. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 429, 132345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poudel, M.B.; Awasthi, G.P.; Kim, H.J. Novel Insight into the Adsorption of Cr(VI) and Pb(II) Ions by MOF Derived Co-Al Layered Double Hydroxide @hematite Nanorods on 3D Porous Carbon Nanofiber Network. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 417, 129312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ercolano, G.; Farina, F.; Cavaliere, S.; Jones, D.J.; Rozière, J. Towards Ultrathin Pt Films on Nanofibres by Surface-Limited Electrodeposition for Electrocatalytic Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3974–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, S.; Basu, S.; Shetti, N.P.; Mondal, K.; Sharma, A.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Versatile Graphitized Carbon Nanofibers in Energy Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 1334–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Birch, M.E.; Ruda-Eberenz, T.A.; Chai, M.; Andrews, R.; Hatfield, R.L. Properties That Influence the Specific Surface Areas of Carbon Nanotubes and Nanofibers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2013, 57, 1148–1166. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shrestha, R.; Li, P.; Chatterjee, B.; Zheng, T.; Wu, X.; Liu, Z.; Luo, T.; Choi, S.; Hippalgaonkar, K.; De Boer, M.P.; et al. Crystalline Polymer Nanofibers with Ultra-High Strength and Thermal Conductivity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nguyen, T.D.; Lee, J.S. Electrospinning-Based Carbon Nanofibers for Energy and Sensor Applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shoukat, R.; Khan, M.I. Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Properties, Synthesis Methods and Applications in Micro and Nanotechnology. Microsyst. Technol. 2021, 27, 4183–4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gugulothu, D.; Barhoum, A.; Nerella, R.; Ajmer, R.; Bechelany, M. Fabrication of Nanofibers: Electrospinning and Non-Electrospinning Techniques. In Handbook of Nanofibers; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; ISBN 9783319536552. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reneker, D.H.; Chun, I. Nanometre Diameter Fibres of Polymer, Produced by Electrospinning. J. Nanotechnol. 1996, 7, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moulefera, I.; Trabelsi, M.; Mamun, A.; Sabantina, L. Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers from Biomass and Biomass Blends—Current Trends. Polymers 2021, 13, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.; Aboagye, A.; Kelkar, A.; Lai, C.; Fong, H. A Review: Carbon Nanofibers from Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile and Their Applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Awad, R.; Haghighat Mamaghani, A.; Boluk, Y.; Hashisho, Z. Synthesis and Characterization of Electrospun PAN-Based Activated Carbon Nanofibers Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals for Adsorption of VOCs. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 410, 128412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nataraj, S.K.; Yang, K.S.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Polyacrylonitrile-Based Nanofibers—A State-of-the-Art Review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 487–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aslam, M.; Khan, T.; Basit, M.; Masood, R.; Raza, Z.A. Polyacrylonitrile-Based Electrospun Nanofibers—A Critical Review. Mater. Werkst. 2022, 53, 1575–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, M.; Han, J.; Wang, F.; Shao, W.; Xiong, R.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, H.; Yang, Y.; Samal, S.K.; Zhang, F.; et al. Electrospun Nanofibers Membranes for Effective Air Filtration. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1600353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Veeramuthu, L.; Venkatesan, M.; Liang, F.C.; Benas, J.S.; Cho, C.J.; Chen, C.W.; Zhou, Y.; Lee, R.H.; Kuo, C.C. Conjugated Copolymers through Electrospinning Synthetic Strategies and Their Versatile Applications in Sensing Environmental Toxicants, PH, Temperature, and Humidity. Polymers 2020, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Salam, A.; Hassan, T.; Jabri, T.; Riaz, S.; Khan, A.; Iqbal, K.M.; Khan, S.U.; Wasim, M.; Shah, M.R.; Khan, M.Q.; et al. Electrospun Nanofiber-Based Viroblock/ZnO/PAN Hybrid Antiviral Nanocomposite for Personal Protective Applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ucar, N.; Kizildag, N.; Onen, A.; Karacan, I.; Eren, O. Polyacrylonitrile-Polyaniline Composite Nanofiber Webs: Effects of Solvents, Redoping Process and Dispersion Technique. Fibers Polym. 2015, 16, 2223–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tsai, J.-S.; Lin, C.-H. The Effect of Molecular Weight on the Cross Section and Properties of Polyacrylonitrile Precursor and Resulting Carbon Fiber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1991, 42, 3045–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, G.; Liu, S.; Hou, H. Synthesis of Polyacrylonitrile and Mechanical Properties of Its Electrospun Nanofibers. E-Polymers 2018, 18, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shahabadi, S.M.S.; Kheradmand, A.; Montazeri, V.; Ziaee, H. Effects of Process and Ambient Parameters on Diameter and Morphology of Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. Polym. Sci. A 2015, 57, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Basu, S.; Jassal, M.; Agrawal, A.K. Concept of Minimum Electrospinning Voltage (MEV) in Electrospinning of PAN-DMF System: Effect of Distance. J. Text. Inst. 2013, 104, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Celep, G.K.; Dincer, K. Optimization of Parameters for Electrospinning of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers by the Taguchi Method. Int. Polym. Process. 2017, 32, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kirecci, A.; Özkoç, Ü.; İçoğlu, H.İ. Determination of Optimal Production Parameters for Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 116, 4961–4968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, X.Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, B.; Bai, T.J.; Wang, Z.Z.; He, T.S. PAN-Derived Electrospun Nanofibers for Supercapacitor Applications: Ongoing Approaches and Challenges; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 56, ISBN 1085302105. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mottaghitalab, V.; Haghi, A.K. A Study on Electrospinning of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Konstantopoulos, G.; Soulis, S.; Dragatogiannis, D.; Charitidis, C. Introduction of a Methodology to Enhance the Stabilization Process of Pan Fibers by Modeling and Advanced Characterization. Materials 2020, 13, 2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ismar, E.; Sarac, A.S. Oxidation of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Webs as a Precursor for Carbon Nanofiber: Aligned and Non-Aligned Nanofibers. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilde, A.L.; Alexander, D.L.J.; Pierlot, A.P.; Denning, R.; Miao, M. Predicting the Cyclization Index and Density of Stabilized Polyacrylonitrile Tow from Processing Conditions. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 3241–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, C.K.; Lai, K.; Liu, W.; Yao, M.; Sun, R.J. Preparation of Carbon Nanofibres through Electrospinning and Thermal Treatment. Polym. Int. 2009, 58, 1341–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Markowski, J.; Zambrzycki, M.; Smolka, W.; Panek, A.; Gubernat, M.; Czaja, P.; Marzec, M.; Fraczek-Szczypta, A. Influence of Heat Treatment of Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers on Biological Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aijaz, M.O.; Karim, M.R.; Alharbi, H.F.; Alharthi, N.H. Novel Optimised Highly Aligned Electrospun PEI-PAN Nanofibre Mats with Excellent Wettability. Polymer 2019, 180, 121665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Villafaña-López, L.; Reyes-Valadez, D.M.; González-Vargas, O.A.; Suárez-Toriello, V.A.; Jaime-Ferrer, J.S. Custom-Made Ion Exchange Membranes at Laboratory Scale for Reverse Electrodialysis. Membranes 2019, 9, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Safari, S.; Ehsani, M.; Zandi, M. Stimuli-Responsive Electrospun Nanofibers Based on PNVCL-PVAc Copolymer in Biomedical Applications. Prog. Biomater. 2021, 10, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Langwald, S.V.; Ehrmann, A.; Sabantina, L. Measuring Physical Properties of Electrospun Nanofiber Mats for Different Biomedical Applications. Membranes 2023, 13, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jacobs, V.; Anandjiwala, R.D.; Maaza, M. The Influence of Electrospinning Parameters on the Structural Morphology and Diameter of Electrospun Nanofibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 3130–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Demirel, T.; Rahman, M.M.; Karacan, I. Structural Characterization of Thermally Stabilized Poly(Acrylonitrile) Fibers by Means of X-ray Diffraction, FT-IR Spectroscopy, and TGA Analysis. Icontech Int. J. 2021, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szepcsik, B.; Pukánszky, B. The Mechanism of Thermal Stabilization of Polyacrylonitrile. Thermochim. Acta 2019, 671, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chae, H.G.; Minus, M.L.; Rasheed, A.; Kumar, S. Stabilization and Carbonization of Gel Spun Polyacrylonitrile/Single Wall Carbon Nanotube Composite Fibers. Polymer 2007, 48, 3781–3789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Son, S.Y.; Jo, A.Y.; Jung, G.Y.; Chung, Y.S.; Lee, S. Accelerating the Stabilization of Polyacrylonitrile Fibers by UV Irradiation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 73, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kong, L.; Liu, H.; Cao, W.; Xu, L. PAN Fiber Diameter Effect on the Structure of PAN-Based Carbon Fibers. Fibers Polym. 2014, 15, 2480–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g001
Figure 1. Electrospinning schema with a rotary fiber collector.
Figure 1. Electrospinning schema with a rotary fiber collector.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g001
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g002
Figure 2. (a) Fiber diameter distribution and (b) average fiber diameter as a function of polymer concentrations at fixed drum rotation 100 RPM and fixed voltage 15 kV, black for 6% w/w, purple 10% w/w and orange for 12% w/w; (c) fiber diameter distribution and (d) average fiber diameter as a function of collector rotation at fixed 6% w/w concentration for voltages 15 kV and 25 kV, blue for 100 RPM, green for 300 RPM and red for 500 RPM.
Figure 2. (a) Fiber diameter distribution and (b) average fiber diameter as a function of polymer concentrations at fixed drum rotation 100 RPM and fixed voltage 15 kV, black for 6% w/w, purple 10% w/w and orange for 12% w/w; (c) fiber diameter distribution and (d) average fiber diameter as a function of collector rotation at fixed 6% w/w concentration for voltages 15 kV and 25 kV, blue for 100 RPM, green for 300 RPM and red for 500 RPM.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g002
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g003
Figure 3. SEM images of PAN fibers prepared under different electrospinning conditions.
Figure 3. SEM images of PAN fibers prepared under different electrospinning conditions.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g003
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g004
Figure 4. Cyclization and oxidation reaction in PAN.
Figure 4. Cyclization and oxidation reaction in PAN.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g004
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g005
Figure 5. (a) FT-IR spectra for the stabilized PAN fibers at 200 °C 2 h and 3 h (b) TGA of PAN fibers under air.
Figure 5. (a) FT-IR spectra for the stabilized PAN fibers at 200 °C 2 h and 3 h (b) TGA of PAN fibers under air.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g005
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g006
Figure 6. SEM microscopy of PAN fibers (a) before and (b) after stabilization for 3 h.
Figure 6. SEM microscopy of PAN fibers (a) before and (b) after stabilization for 3 h.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g006
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g007
Figure 7. Contact angle values for the PAN fibers stabilized at 250 °C (a) for 2 h as a function of % w/w PAN in solution, (b) for 2 h as a function of drum rotation rate RPM, and (c) as a function of electrospinning voltage for two stabilization times.
Figure 7. Contact angle values for the PAN fibers stabilized at 250 °C (a) for 2 h as a function of % w/w PAN in solution, (b) for 2 h as a function of drum rotation rate RPM, and (c) as a function of electrospinning voltage for two stabilization times.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g007
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g008
Figure 8. Water absorption of PAN fibers as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time.
Figure 8. Water absorption of PAN fibers as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g008
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g009
Figure 9. Porosity % of PAN cloth fibers measured by imaging method as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time process at 250 °C.
Figure 9. Porosity % of PAN cloth fibers measured by imaging method as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time process at 250 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g009
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g010
Figure 10. Porosity % of PAN cloth fibers measured by the gravimetric method as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time process at 250 °C.
Figure 10. Porosity % of PAN cloth fibers measured by the gravimetric method as a function of (a) % w/w of PAN in solution, (b) RPM, and (c) stabilization time process at 250 °C.
Nanomaterials 13 02648 g010
Table 1. Dehydrogenation and cyclization index as function of time for PAN fibers.
Table 1. Dehydrogenation and cyclization index as function of time for PAN fibers.
Process 2 h3 h
Dehydrogenation CH 2 6.4813.42
CH
Cyclization C ≡ N 62.9681.94
C = N
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz Rocha, J.E.; Moreno Tovar, K.R.; Navarro Mendoza, R.; Gutiérrez Granados, S.; Cavaliere, S.; Giaume, D.; Barboux, P.; Jaime Ferrer, J.S. Critical Electrospinning Parameters for Synthesis Control of Stabilized Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2648. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192648

AMA Style

Ruiz Rocha JE, Moreno Tovar KR, Navarro Mendoza R, Gutiérrez Granados S, Cavaliere S, Giaume D, Barboux P, Jaime Ferrer JS. Critical Electrospinning Parameters for Synthesis Control of Stabilized Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(19):2648. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz Rocha, Juan Emmanuel, Karla Rebeca Moreno Tovar, Ricardo Navarro Mendoza, Silvia Gutiérrez Granados, Sara Cavaliere, Domitille Giaume, Philippe Barboux, and Jesús Salvador Jaime Ferrer. 2023. "Critical Electrospinning Parameters for Synthesis Control of Stabilized Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers" Nanomaterials 13, no. 19: 2648. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop