Next Article in Journal
Template-Free Manufacturing of Defined Structure and Size Polymeric Microparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Solid-Phase Extraction of Tamoxifen and Its Metabolites from Human Plasma Using MOF-Integrated Polyacrylonitrile Composites: A Study on CuBTC and ZIF-8 Efficacy
Previous Article in Journal
High-Entropy Lead-Free Perovskite Bi0.2K0.2Ba0.2Sr0.2Ca0.2TiO3 Powders and Related Ceramics: Synthesis, Processing, and Electrical Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Addition of Co into CuO–ZnO Oxides Triggers High Antibacterial Activity and Low Cytotoxicity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MgO Nanoparticles Obtained from an Innovative and Sustainable Route and Their Applications in Cancer Therapy

1
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale E. Pontieri 1, Monteluco di Roio, Roio Poggio, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Edificio Renato Ricamo, Via Vetoio, Coppito, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(22), 2975; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222975
Submission received: 11 October 2023 / Revised: 13 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 19 November 2023

Abstract

:
This paper aimed to evaluate the biological damages towards diseased cells caused by the use of MgO nanoparticles (NPs). The NPs are produced by a calcination process of a precursor, which is an aqueous suspension of nanostructured Mg(OH)2, in turn synthesized following our original, time-energy saving and scalable method able to guarantee short times, high yield of production (up to almost 10 kg/week of NPs), low environmental impact and low energy demand. The MgO NPs, in the form of dry powders, are organized as a network of intercrystallite channels, in turn constituted by monodispersed and roughly spherical NPs < 10 nm, preserving the original pseudo hexagonal-platelet morphology of the precursor. The produced MgO powders are diluted in a PBS solution to obtain different MgO suspension concentrations that are subsequently put in contact, for 3 days, with melanoma and healthy cells. The viable count, made at 24, 48 and 72 h from the beginning of the test, reveals a good cytotoxic activity of the NPs, already at low MgO concentrations. This is particularly marked after 72 h, showing a clear reduction in cellular proliferation in a MgO-concentration-dependent manner. Finally, the results obtained on human skin fibroblasts revealed that the use MgO NPs did not alter at all both the vitality and proliferation of healthy cells.

1. Introduction

One of the major diseases currently afflicting the population worldwide is cancer, in which a group of cells reveal an uncontrolled growth into the body that leads, sometimes, to the formation of metastasis [1,2]. The conventional approaches used to treat cancer are chemotherapy, radiation and surgery; nevertheless, these procedures often present severe limitations since they can affect both diseased and healthy cells in the body.
So, the possibility of employing metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) in place of harmful techniques has become the current intriguing challenge, allowing for the establishment of a new criterion for the development of NPs in the medical field, where extensive applications are required [1,2,3,4]. This is due to the anticancer activity of the NPs depending on their intrinsic features such as antioxidant action, as well as to their ability to interact with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, both inside and outside the cell.
In particular, the potential cytotoxicity of NPs against cancer cells is related to oxidative stress stimulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to an apoptotic process and inducing significant cell structure damage to membrane lipids, membrane proteins and to the nuclear membrane [2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Metal oxide NPs are also able to produce free radicals that kill cancer cells if stimulated by an external radiation source, such as hyperthermia, in response to the application of infrared rays or magnetic fields. In particular, the NPs acting as co-adjuvant agents can increase the cell killing effect of ionizing radiation during the radiotherapy process, specifically on cancer cells [1].
Moreover, these NPs can allow a site-specific release of therapeutic drugs targeted towards cancer cells, guaranteeing an improvement in their biodistribution, a longer shelf life and an administration of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances through oral, nasal, intraocular and parenteral routes [12,13]. Due to their ability to overpower cellular strategies blocking foreign bodies, the NPs can make it easy for the drugs to target the cancer cells, thus decreasing their dangerous effects on healthy ones [14].
Metal oxide NPs are experimentally used to directly kill cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo [5] and nowadays, among all of them, magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO NPs) have been established at the forefront of nanomedical research, thanks to their considerable potential for treating a sore stomach, bone regeneration and as an antibacterial agent [15,16,17]. This is due to their interesting properties in terms of stability, crystallinity, absorptivity, large surface area and reactivity. Moreover, a not-negligible issue is that MgO NPs, differently from other kind of metal oxide (such as ZnO and TiO2), can be considered biocompatible with the human organism, making these NPs even more promising in terms of their antibacterial activity [18]. More recently, MgO NPs have also been applied in cancer therapy, such as in nano-cryosurgery, hyperthermia and as chemotherapeutic agents for the rapid detection and identification of all cancer types [19,20,21].
As reported in the literature, several methods for synthesizing MgO NPs with high quality, improved monodispersity and crystallinity are available; they include precipitation, microwave-induced combustion, hydrothermal processes, flame spray pyrolysis, aerosol combustion, chemical vapor deposition, flame metal combustion and sol–gel [16,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Nevertheless, these methods are often characterized by limitations due to high temperature/pressure, expensive or sophisticated apparatuses, long synthesis times and a low yield of NP production. In addition, green synthesis procedures based on the use of biological extracts have been proposed, allowing for obtaining MgO NPs in a cost-effective way [28,29,30]. These biological processes, although environmentally friendly and less hazardous than physicochemical ones, pose concerns regarding the scale-up in NP production, in relation to the complexity of the biological extracts created during the synthesis, a barrier to the elucidation of the reactions and their mechanisms [28]. More recently, the solution-phase methods have gained greater attention, demonstrating the possibility of producing MgO NPs starting from the precipitation of a precursor that is magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2). In this task, the precursor features play a fundamental role as they affect the process of topochemical decomposition, influencing the size and morphology of the produced MgO NPs [31,32]. However, even these methods present drawbacks mainly related to high temperatures and multistep procedures (purifications/washings), resulting in long synthesis times and a low yield of production, which is a crucial limitation for the large-scale application of the MgO NPs.
The possibility, provided by our innovative and sustainable ion exchange synthetic route, to produce in only 15 min up to almost 10 kg/week of pure and crystalline Mg(OH)2 NPs, useful as precursors to MgO ones, can constitute an important goal in defining the starting point for the scale-up in NP production to the market requests, particularly in the medical field where large amounts of NPs are necessary. The process is a time–energy saving and eco-friendly synthetic route that works in a single step, at an ambient temperature/pressure, with renewable reagents, low energy consumption and without any toxic waste [33], guaranteeing a drastic reduction in the synthesis times and a scale up in the NP production.
Profiting from the productivity of our cyclic route, the aim of this paper was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the MgO NPs towards cancer formation and growth by means of in vitro tests. The tests were aimed at establishing the biological damages caused by the NPs in terms of their released of toxic chemicals and ability to kill diseased cells by means of inhibition of cell metabolic pathways.
In particular, starting from the synthesis of the precursor—Mg(OH)2 NPs—and following a calcination process, pure and crystalline MgO NPs were obtained. Both Mg(OH)2 and MgO NPs were characterized from structural and morphological points of view, by means of an X-ray diffraction (profile fitting and Rietveld refinement) technique, transmission electron microscopy (TEM/HRTEM) and surface area measurements (BET).
The MgO NPs, in the form of dry powders, were dispersed in a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution, giving rise to different MgO suspension concentrations that were injected into a culture of melanoma cells. After 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment that were performed considering different MgO concentrations, a viable count was carried out and the number of live cells at the different incubation times was established. Then, the growth curves, expressed as a function of the cell culture time and of the MgO concentration, were determined. Finally, the evaluation of the influence of MgO NPs on human skin fibroblasts (HS27) was investigated as well.

2. Materials

The materials employed to synthesize the precursor, that were Mg(OH)2 NPs, were magnesium chloride (MgCl2), with a purity > 98%, supplied by Merck (Union County, NJ, USA), and an ion-exchange resin Dowex Monosphere 550A (Lennthech, Delft, The Netherlands), in form of translucent spherical beads characterized by a particle size equal to 590 ± 50 µm, supplied by Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.1. Synthesis of MgO NPs Obtained Starting from Mg(OH)2 Precursor

The synthesis of the precursor—Mg(OH)2 NPs in form of an aqueous suspension—was performed by means of our innovative and sustainable procedure, already patented for the production of different metal oxide/hydroxide NPs [34,35].
In particular, the sustainability of the process lies in the possibility to work in water, at room temperature and ambient pressure, with low environmental impact, low energy consumption and without the production of any toxic waste. Briefly, a 1 M MgCl2 aqueous solution was put in contact, for only 15 min and under moderate stirring, with a proper amount of anionic resin, working at room temperature (T = 25 °C). After a few seconds, the precipitation of solid Mg(OH)2 occurred and, at the end of the synthesis, the Mg(OH)2 aqueous suspension (from here called MH) was separated from the resin by means of a sieving procedure [33]. During the stirring operation, the kinetics of the ion exchange process were determined by taking homogeneous samples from the suspension, at different reaction times with the resin (t = 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 75, 180, 300, 600 and 900 s, respectively). By using an ion-sensitive electrode (Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland), the variation in the chloride concentration, from the beginning to the end of the synthesis, was measured. From the obtained results, the process appeared characterized by very fast kinetics in terms of MH NP production, giving rise to a reduction in the chloride content of about 90% in the first 30 s, with a residual chloride content at the end of the synthesis of (13.3 ± 0.1) mg/L. In addition, the possibility of using renewable reagents allowed for the scale up of the NP production of up to almost 10 kg/week.
Firstly, the MH precursor was dried at 110 °C for 24 h in a laboratory oven (Memmert TV30b, Enco, Venezia, Italy) to reduce the volume of the sample. Subsequently, in order to obtain the MgO sample (MgO), the dried powders of the precursor were grounded and calcinated at 500 °C for 4 h, by using a Lenton furnace (Lenton thermal designs LTD, London, UK) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. In particular, the optimal temperature range to be used for the calcination process was established according to the methodology proposed in our previous paper [32].

2.2. Characterization of the Produced MgO NPs

The MH precursor, as well as the obtained MgO powders, were characterized by XRD, TEM/HRTEM and BET measurements. Phase purity and crystallinity of MH and MgO samples were analysed by means of XRD spectra, recorded on a PANalytical X’PertPRO apparatus (Almelo, The Netherlands) using CuKα radiation, with a step scan, covering the angular range 2θ from 10° to 90°, and a step size 2θ = 0.026°. The experimental diffraction patterns were elaborated by a Profile Fit Software Version 4.9 (HighScorePlus software package, PANalytical, Cedar Park, TX, USA), and crystalline phases were attributed by the international ICDD and ICSD reference databases. In addition, XRD peak broadening analysis was carried out to evaluate the average crystallite size, Dhkl, through the Debye–Scherrer formula [36]. The particle morphology was investigated by means of transmission and high-resolution electron microscopy (TEM (Thermo Fischer Scientific Brno s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic), Philips CM100 and HRTEM (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA), TECNAI G2 TF30 STEM, respectively), according to standard procedures, while the particle dimensions were calculated by using ImageJ software (Java 1.6.0_20).
Finally, for the surface area measurements, nitrogen adsorption analysis was carried out at 77 K, using a Quantachrome Nova system utilizing Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET). Both MH and MgO samples (approximately 0.2 g dry powders) were first outgassed for about 2 h at 150 °C, then for about 16 h at 250 °C, (5·10−3 Torr). The pore size distribution was determined from the desorption branch of the isotherms using the BJH (Barett–Joyner–Halenda) method.

2.3. In Vitro Tests to Evaluate the MgO NPs’ Efficacy as Toxicological Agents against Cancer Cells

First of all, a stock suspension, containing the produced MgO powders dispersed in a phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution, was prepared. This suspension, characterized by a MgO concentration equal to 80 mg/mL—and from here called MgO80—was sonicated for 15 min by using an ultrasound tip sonicator (Vibra-Cell™ Ultrasonic VCX 400, Tecnochimica, Grottazzolina, Italy).
Subsequently, to evaluate the effect of MgO NPs towards the proliferation and viability of both cancer and healthy cells, melanoma cells (Bmel) and human skin fibroblasts (HS27) were considered. The trypan blue dye exclusion test (TBDET) was used to determine the viability of the considered cells, whose proliferations were assessed by exposing the cells to different MgO suspension concentrations, for various times.
These cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin; the whole system was maintained at a fixed temperature of 37 °C, working in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced every 3 days, and the cells were detached and sub-cultured when ≊90% confluence was reached.
A total of 70,000 cells for Bmel and 100,000 cells for HS27 (in 1.5 mL of culture medium/well) were seeded into cell culture dishes (growth area 10 cm2) and after 24 h the cells were exposed to the MgO NPs.
In particular, by dilution of the initial MgO80, six MgO suspensions in PBS were prepared, having MgO concentrations equal to 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/mL, respectively. Each suspension was sonicated for 15 min, and then 15 μL were picked and added to the culture plates until obtaining final MgO concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 µg/mL (MgO50, MgO100, MgO200, MgO300, MgO400 and MgO500, respectively). These suspensions were put in contact both with melanoma and healthy cells for 3 days.
After 24, 48 and 72 h from the beginning of the treatment, the cell counting was performed by using a Neubauer hemocytometer and a Nikon Eclipse TS 100 (Tokyo, Japan) inverted microscope, equipped with a phase contrast objective. The cell viability was assessed by removing cells from the plates with 0.05% trypsin-0.02% EDTA solution and by combining 20 µL aliquots of this cell suspension with 20 µL of 4% trypan blue dye solution. The dye stained the damaged cells leaving the undamaged ones colorless, while a diffuse cytoplasmic staining underlined the cell death [37].
For each MgO suspension concentration, two dishes were counted, and this procedure was repeated two times; the obtained results were compared with those coming from melanoma and healthy cells without the addition of MgO NPs.
Finally, by means of a calculator [38,39], the concentration at which a substance exerts half of its maximal inhibitory effect (IC50) was determined.

3. Results

The synthesized MH nanoparticles, dried in an oven at 60 °C, were characterized in terms of crystallinity and phase purity by means of XRD investigation. The hexagonal brucite structure (ICSD #98-008-9823), with cell parameters a and c calculated by the Rietveld method (Table 1), was recognized and no secondary phases were detected, denoting the phase purity of the obtained crystalline MH NPs (Figure 1a). Moreover, the Bragg peaks appeared broadened, underlining the small dimension of the produced crystallites having an average crystallite size <Dhkl> value of about 14 nm, as calculated by the Debye–Scherrer formula (see Table 1).
The MH precursor was then calcinated at 500 °C for 4 h, according to the methodology proposed in [32] and, during this time, a complete decomposition process of Mg(OH)2 to MgO occurred, as reported in (1):
Mg(OH)2 → MgO + H2O
Following the calcination process, pure and crystalline MgO NPs were produced, as observed from the XRD spectrum, which revealed that as all the peaks well matched the standard diffraction pattern of MgO (ICSD #98-017-0905), no trace of impurities can be recognized (Figure 1b). Here too, the peaks appear broadened showing a <Dhk> value of less than 9 nm (Table 1). From the analysis of the Dhkl values, no particularly marked differences in widths between the Bragg peaks were denoted, underlining the spherical shape of the produced NPs [40].
Morphology and particle dimensions of both MH and MgO samples were examined by means of TEM and HRTEM investigations. Concerning the MH sample, the presence of pseudo-hexagonal lamellas characterized by an average size ranging from 30 to 90 nm and thickness ≤ 10 nm was recognized (see the inset in Figure 2a and the arrow in Figure 2b, respectively). Really, as also observed in our previous works [32,33], at higher magnification each lamella appeared to be composed by a dense and oriented aggregation of primary nanoparticles < 10 nm, homogeneously dispersed and acting as nanosized precursors (Figure 2c).
As soon as the decomposition process of the precursor occurred, a pseudomorphic transformation of MH can be observed [32], giving rise to the formation of nanometric MgO organized in the form of a network of intercrystallite channels maintaining the original pseudo-hexagonal-platelet morphology of the precursor itself (Figure 3a,b).
At higher magnification, each channel appeared to be composed by an aggregation of monodispersed and roughly spherical MgO NPs having dimensions less than 10 nm (Figure 3c), also confirming the results coming from the XRD.
Both for MH and MgO samples, the presence of small nanometric crystals organized to form each pseudo-hexagonal lamella is confirmed by BET surface area analyses, reported in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. For the MH precursor, BET values up to 86 m2/g were recorded, which were values much higher than those reported in the literature [41,42,43]. Regarding the nitrogen desorption/adsorption measurements, the isotherms and the corresponding BJH (Barret–Joyner–Halenda) pore size distribution were reported in Figure 4. According to IUPAC classification, the adsorption isotherm was well matched to type IV, corresponding to the multilayer adsorption on micro and mesoporous solids [44]. At higher relative pressures, 0.90–1.0 p/p, vertical and parallel adsorption and desorption branches can be noted (Figure 4a), related to an H1 hysteresis loop and attributable to solids crossed by channels uniformly distributed in size and shape [45,46]. The results coming from the pore size distribution (Figure 4b) obtained by means of the BJH method showed that the MH dry powders are composed by pores mainly centred in the range 5–50 nm, confirming the mesoporous structure, probably deriving from the aggregation process of thin nanoplates.
Concerning the produced MgO powders, BET values up to 137 m2/g were obtained, while the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm showed a type III characteristic, with an H3 hysteresis loop (Figure 5a). These results underlined the presence of large textural mesopores probably related to the MgO NPs’ aggregation [32], as also observed by the TEM technique. From the BJH analysis (Figure 5b), a bimodal distribution of mesopores in the range of 3–30 nm can be observed as well.
The cytotoxic activity of the MgO NPs towards cancer cells was assessed by performing tests on human melanoma cells. In particular, MgO50, MgO100, MgO200, MgO300, MgO400 and MgO500 suspensions, chosen for the treatments, were sonicated to reach a homogeneous distribution of the NPs and then added into the culture plates.
The same procedure was then repeated for human skin fibroblasts (HS27), to evaluate the influence of the treatment on healthy cells.
After 24, 48 and 72 h from the beginning of the treatment, a viable count was carried out, and the number of live cells of both melanoma and HS27 cells was shown (Table 2). Moreover, by using the results summarized in Table 2, the growth curves of melanoma cells and skin fibroblasts were determined as well (Figure 6).
From the obtained results, it was evident as without the addition of MgO NPs, the melanoma cells proliferated up to an order of magnitude by increasing the incubation time, with cell values ranging from 73,000 (t = 0) to more than 756,500 (t = 72 h).
Differently, when the MgO NPs were added, at already 24 h a clear cytotoxic effect was detected, showing a significant reduction in melanoma cell proliferation in a MgO-concentration-dependent manner (Figure 6a,b). In particular, after 3 days of incubation time, the culture plates treated with MgO400 revealed a reduction in the cellular activity up to an order of magnitude, with a melanoma live cell counting ranging from 756,500 to 74,600 (see Table 2).
When the highest MgO concentration was reached (that is MgO500), a total inhibition of the cell growth was observed, with the number of detected live cells almost constant during the whole incubation time.
Regarding the skin fibroblasts (HS27), it was evident that as the MgO NPs, even at the highest suspension concentration, did not alter at all either the vitality or proliferation of healthy cells (Figure 6c,d).
Regarding the dead cells, identified by means of the microscope technique due to a dye solution containing Trypan Blue, mainly after 48 h of treatment an increase in mortality rate can be observed. The results were particularly marked for the treatment performed with the MgO suspension concentrations, showing an increase up to an order of magnitude in the mortality rate. In particular, the values ranged from 1.4% for the untreated sample to about 5% for samples treated with MgO200 and up to 20% for the sample treated with MgO400.
Finally, the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) related to melanoma cells was calculated for all the considered incubation times; the obtained results were equal to 140.5 ± 17.68, 152.5 ± 13.43 and 123.5 ± 0.71 μg/mL after 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively.
Considering that the obtained IC50 values are generally lower than those reported in the literature [2,47] and given that the lower the IC50 value is, the greater the effect of the compounds is [47], the MgO NPs under this study can be considered very effective in terms of the cytotoxicity and proliferation inhibition of cancer cells, which are also able to preserve the healthy cells.

4. Conclusions

The intrinsic features of metal oxide nanoparticles in terms of antioxidant action as well as cytotoxic behaviour towards cancer cells has become the current intriguing challenge, introducing a new criterion for the development of extensive applications of the NPs themselves in the medical field. Among all of them, magnesium oxide NPs have been established at the forefront of nanomedical research thanks to their interesting properties in terms of crystallinity, stability, absorptivity, large surface area, reactivity and biocompatibility.
Most of the current synthetic routes for the MgO NP production reported in the literature are not able to satisfy the global challenges in terms of sustainability, green approaches and scalability, being frequently characterized by drawbacks related to high temperature/pressure conditions, expensive or sophisticated apparatuses, long synthesis times and, especially, a low yield of NP production.
In this task, the possibility provided by our innovative and sustainable route, to obtain in only 15 min up to almost 10 kg/week of Mg(OH)2 NPs acting as a precursor, can constitute an important goal for the extensive application of the MgO NPs, particularly in the medical field where large amounts of product are required.
In the present study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of MgO NPs obtained from the calcination of a Mg(OH)2 precursor synthesized starting from our time–energy saving and cyclic method towards the cancer formation and growth by means of in vitro tests.
In particular, the MgO NPs, if formed of dry powders and having BET values up to 137 m2/g, appeared organized as a network of intercrystallite channels, preserving the original pseudo-hexagonal-platelet morphology of the precursor and formed by an aggregation of monodispersed and roughly spherical NPs < 10 nm.
The produced MgO NPs, dispersed in a PBS solution giving rise to different MgO suspension concentrations, were then used to evaluate their cytotoxic behavior towards melanoma cells and their influence on healthy cells. The growth curves revealed that when the MgO NPs were added, a clear cytotoxic effect was already detected at low incubation times (24 h) and at low MgO suspension concentrations, giving rise to a non-negligible reduction in cellular proliferation. After 72 h of treatment, by increasing the MgO suspension concentration, a reduction in the cellular activity up to an order of magnitude was observed. When the MgO500 concentration was reached, a total inhibition of the cell growth was detected, with a number of live cells almost constant during the whole incubation time.
Finally, the results coming from the skin fibroblasts (HS27) revealed that the MgO NPs did not alter in any way both the vitality and proliferation of healthy cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.D. and G.T.; methodology, V.D., G.T., P.C. and A.R.V.; validation, V.D. and G.T.; investigation, V.D., G.T., P.C. and A.R.V.; data curation, V.D., G.T., P.C. and A.R.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D.; writing—review and editing, V.D., G.T., P.C. and A.R.V.; visualization, V.D., G.T., P.C. and A.R.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Lorenzo Arrizza, the Microscopy Center (University of L’Aquila), and Stefano Casciardi, DiMEILA Inail (Rome), for their precious experimental assistance on TEM and HRTEM observations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vinardell, M.P.; Mitjans, M. Antitumor Activities of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 1004–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Krishnamoorthy, K.; Moon, J.Y.; Hyun, H.B.; Cho, S.K.; Kim, S.-J. Mechanistic investigation on the toxicity of MgO nanoparticles toward cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24610–24617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fahmy, H.M.; El-Hakim, M.H.; Nady, D.S.; Elkaramany, Y.; Mohamed, F.A.; Yasien, A.M.; Moustafa, M.A.; Elmsery, B.E.; Yousef, H.A. Review on MgO nanoparticles multifunctional role in the biomedical field: Properties and applications. Nanomed. J. 2022, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  4. Caputo, F.; De Nicola, M.; Ghibelli, L. Pharmacological potential of bioactive engineered nanomaterials. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 92, 112–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumaran, R.S.; Choi, Y.-K.; Singh, V.; Song, H.-J.; Song, K.-G.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, H.J. In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation of MgO Nanoparticles and Their Effect on the Expression of ROS Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7551–7564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Manke, A.; Wang, L.; Rojanasakul, Y. Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 942916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Park, E.-J.; Choi, J.; Park, Y.-K.; Park, K. Oxidative stress induced by cerium oxide nanoparticles in cultured BEAS-2B cells. Toxicology 2008, 245, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, Y.-W.; Wu, C.-H.; Aronstam, R.S. Toxicity of Transition Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: Recent Insights from in vitro Studies. Materials 2010, 3, 4842–4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stone, V.; Shaw, J.; Brown, D.; MacNee, W.; Faux, S.; Donaldson, K. The role of oxidative stress in the prolonged inhibitory effect of ultrafine carbon black on epithelial cell function. Toxicol. Vitr. 1998, 12, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pugazhendhi, A.; Prabhu, R.; Muruganantham, K.; Shanmuganathan, R.; Natarajan, S. Anticancer, antimicrobial and photocatalytic activities of green synthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgONPs) using aqueous extract of Sargassum wightii. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2018, 190, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Majeed, S.; Danish, M.; Muhadi, N.F.B.B. Genotoxicity and apoptotic activity of biologically synthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles against human lung cancer A-549 cell line. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 025011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ranganathan, R.; Madanmohan, S.; Kesavan, A.; Baskar, G.; Krishnamoorthy, Y.R.; Santosham, R.; Ponraju, D.; Rayala, S.K.; Venkatraman, G. Nanomedicine: Towards development of patient-friendly drug-delivery systems for oncological applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1043–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beeler, E.; Gabani, P.; Singh, O.V. Implementation of nanoparticles in therapeutic radiation oncology. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2017, 19, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ciccarese, F.; Raimondi, V.; Sharova, E.; Silic-Benussi, M.; Ciminale, V. Nanoparticles as Tools to Target Redox Homeostasis in Cancer Cells. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jin, T.; He, Y. Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011, 13, 6877–6885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, Z.-X.; Lv, B.-F. MgO nanoparticles as antibacterial agent: Preparation and activity. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bertinetti, L.; Drouet, C.; Combes, C.; Rey, C.; Tampieri, A.; Coluccia, S.; Martra, G. Surface Characteristics of Nanocrystalline Apatites: Effect of Mg Surface Enrichment on Morphology, Surface Hydration Species, and Cationic Environments. Langmuir 2009, 25, 5647–5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leung, Y.H.; Ng, A.M.C.; Xu, X.; Shen, Z.; Gethings, L.A.; Wong, M.T.; Chan, C.M.N.; Guo, M.Y.; Ng, Y.H.; Djurišić, A.B.; et al. Mechanisms of Antibacterial Activity of MgO: Non-ROS Mediated Toxicity of MgO Nanoparticles Towards Escherichia coli. Small 2014, 10, 1171–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mirhosseini, M. Evaluation of antibacterial effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles with nisin and heat in milk. Mashhad Univ. Med. Sci. 2016, 3, 135–142. [Google Scholar]
  20. Di, D.-R.; He, Z.-Z.; Sun, Z.-Q.; Liu, J. A new nano-cryosurgical modality for tumor treatment using biodegradable MgO nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012, 8, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karthik, K.; Dhanuskodi, S.; Kumar, S.P.; Gobinath, C.; Sivaramakrishnan, S. Microwave assisted green synthesis of MgO nanorods and their antibacterial and anti-breast cancer activities. Mater. Lett. 2017, 206, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Camtakan, Z.; Erenturk, S.; Yusan, S. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization, and uranium sorption properties. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2011, 31, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, J.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Jun, K.W.; Baeg, J.O.; Yim, D.J. Chemical synthesis and characterization of highly oil dispersed MgO nanoparticles. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2006, 12, 882–887. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu, J.C.; Xu, A.; Zhang, L.; Song, R.; Wu, L. Synthesis and Characterization of Porous Magnesium Hydroxide and Oxide Nanoplates. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Engelsen, D.D.; Wu, J.; Du, Y.; Li, H.; Jia, X. Controlled Synthesis of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles for Dye Adsorption. J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 2017, 12, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chae, S.; Lee, H.; Pikhitsa, P.V.; Kim, C.; Shin, S.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, M. Synthesis of terraced and spherical MgO nanoparticles using flame metal combustion. Powder Technol. 2017, 305, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balamurugan, S.; Ashna, L.; Parthiban, P. Synthesis of Nanocrystalline MgO Particles by Combustion Followed by Annealing Method Using Hexamine as a Fuel. J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 2014, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abinaya, S.; Kavitha, H.P.; Prakash, M.; Muthukrishnaraj, A. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and its applications: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 19, 100368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.I.; Akhtar, M.N.; Ashraf, N.; Najeeb, J.; Munir, H.; Awan, T.I.; Tahir, M.B.; Kabli, M.R. Green synthesis of magnesium oxide nanoparticles using Dalbergia sissoo extract for photocatalytic activity and antibacterial efficacy. Appl. Nanosci. 2020, 10, 2351–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sugirtha, P.; Divya, R.; Yedhukrishnan, R.; Suganthi, K.; Anusha, N.; Ponnusami, V.; Rajan, K. Green Synthesis of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles Using Brassica oleracea and Punica granatum Peels and their Anticancer and Photocatalytic Activity. Asian J. Chem. 2015, 27, 2513–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McKelvy, M.J.; Sharma, R.; Chizmeshya, A.V.G.; Carpenter, R.W.; Streib, K. Magnesium Hydroxide Dehydroxylation: In Situ Nanoscale Observations of Lamellar Nucleation and Growth. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Taglieri, G.; Daniele, V.; Mondelli, C. MgO nanoparticles synthesized starting from an innovative one-step process. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 101, 1780–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taglieri, G.; Felice, B.; Daniele, V.; Ferrante, F. Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles produced at room temperature by an innovative, facile, and scalable synthesis route. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2015, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Volpe, R.; Taglieri, G.; Daniele, V.; Del Re, G. A Process for the Synthesis of Ca(OH)2 Nanoparticles by Means of Ionic Exchange Resins. European Patent EP2880101B1, 21 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Taglieri, G.; Macera, L.; Daniele, V. Procedimento per la Sintesi di Nanoparticelle di Ferridrite o di Magnetite Mediante Resine a Scambio Ionico. Italian Patent 102019000017981, 4 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fiala, J. D. L. Bish, J. E. Post (eds). Modern powder diffraction. Mineralogical society of America, Washington, 1989, XI + 369 p, 167 figures, $20.00, ISBN 0-939950-24-3. Cryst. Res. Technol. 1990, 25, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tolnai, S. A method for viable cell count. Tissue Cult. Assoc. Man. 1975, 1, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clark, N.A.; Hafner, M.; Kouril, M.; Williams, E.H.; Muhlich, J.L.; Pilarczyk, M.; Niepel, M.; Sorger, P.K.; Medvedovic, M. GRcalculator: An online tool for calculating and mining dose–response data. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. GR Metrics. Available online: http://www.grcalculator.org/grcalculator/ (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  40. Qazi, S.J.S.; Rennie, A.R.; Cockcroft, J.K.; Vickers, M. Use of wide-angle X-ray diffraction to measure shape and size of dispersed colloidal particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 338, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lv, J.; Qiu, L.; Qu, B. Controlled synthesis of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles with different morphological structures and related properties in flame retardant ethylene–vinyl acetate blends. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1576–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Henrist, C.; Mathieu, J.-P.; Vogels, C.; Rulmont, A.; Cloots, R. Morphological study of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles precipitated in dilute aqueous solution. J. Cryst. Growth 2003, 249, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lv, J.; Qiu, L.; Qu, B. Controlled growth of three morphological structures of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles by wet precipitation method. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 267, 676–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alothman, Z.A. A Review: Fundamental Aspects of Silicate Mesoporous Materials. Materials 2012, 5, 2874–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Condon, J.B. Surface Area and Porosity Determinations by Physisorption: Measurement, Classical Theories and Quantum Theory; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chang, S.-S.; Clair, B.; Ruelle, J.; Beauchêne, J.; Di Renzo, F.; Quignard, F.; Zhao, G.-J.; Yamamoto, H.; Gril, J. Mesoporosity as a new parameter for understanding tension stress generation in trees. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3023–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moustafa, I.M.; Saleh, I.A.; Abdelhami, M.R. Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles from Different Organic Precursors: Catalytic Decontamination of Organic Pollutants and Antitumor Activity. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 6, 1000359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of the synthesized nanoparticles. (a) The precursor Mg(OH)2 (MH sample); (b) MgO NPs obtained after the calcination process (MgO sample).
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of the synthesized nanoparticles. (a) The precursor Mg(OH)2 (MH sample); (b) MgO NPs obtained after the calcination process (MgO sample).
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g001
Figure 2. HRTEM images of MH nanoparticles acting as a precursor. (a,b) The presence of pseudo-hexagonal lamellas much lower than 90 nm with thicknesses less than 10 nm can be observed; (c) at higher magnification, each lamella was really composed by a self-assembly of primary and homogeneously dispersed nanoparticles < 10 nm.
Figure 2. HRTEM images of MH nanoparticles acting as a precursor. (a,b) The presence of pseudo-hexagonal lamellas much lower than 90 nm with thicknesses less than 10 nm can be observed; (c) at higher magnification, each lamella was really composed by a self-assembly of primary and homogeneously dispersed nanoparticles < 10 nm.
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g002
Figure 3. TEM images of the produced MgO NPs obtained starting from the calcination process of the precursor. (a,b) Following the pseudomorphic decomposition of MH, the formation of a network of intercrystallite channels of MgO NPs can be observed; (c) each pseudo-hexagonal lamella is composed by an aggregation of monodispersed and roughly spherical MgO NPs, less than 10 nm.
Figure 3. TEM images of the produced MgO NPs obtained starting from the calcination process of the precursor. (a,b) Following the pseudomorphic decomposition of MH, the formation of a network of intercrystallite channels of MgO NPs can be observed; (c) each pseudo-hexagonal lamella is composed by an aggregation of monodispersed and roughly spherical MgO NPs, less than 10 nm.
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g003
Figure 4. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for MH dry powders; (b) Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution curve determined by using the N2 desorption isotherm.
Figure 4. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for MH dry powders; (b) Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution curve determined by using the N2 desorption isotherm.
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g004
Figure 5. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for MgO dry powders; (b) Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution curve determined by using the N2 desorption isotherm.
Figure 5. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for MgO dry powders; (b) Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution curve determined by using the N2 desorption isotherm.
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g005
Figure 6. (a,c) Histograms representing the number of live melanoma and healthy cells in relation to the MgO suspension concentration as well as to the incubation time; (b,d) growth curves of melanoma cells and skin fibroblasts expressed as a function of the incubation time and the MgO suspension concentration too.
Figure 6. (a,c) Histograms representing the number of live melanoma and healthy cells in relation to the MgO suspension concentration as well as to the incubation time; (b,d) growth curves of melanoma cells and skin fibroblasts expressed as a function of the incubation time and the MgO suspension concentration too.
Nanomaterials 13 02975 g006
Table 1. Crystalline size, evaluated by the Debye–Scherrer formula, of MH and MgO samples.
Table 1. Crystalline size, evaluated by the Debye–Scherrer formula, of MH and MgO samples.
ICSD 98-008-9823MH NPsICSD 98-017-0905MgO NPs
a = 3.1430 Å
c = 4.7670 Å
a = 3.1478 Å
c = 4.7819 Å
a = 4.2270 Å
c = 4.2270 Å
a = 4.2227 Å
c = 4.2227 Å
hklI (%)2 Theta (°)I (%)Dhkl
(nm)
<Dhkl>
average value
(nm)
hklI (%)2 Theta (°)I (%)Dhkl
(nm)
<Dhkl>
average value
(nm)
00196.3018.6096.2012.6114.2711111.4036.8011.477.538.37
0102.6032.885.1512.9500210042.751007.67
01110038.0410013.1302245.0062.0544.958.35
01237.8050.8837.8613.761134.9074.374.949.01
11027.8058.7027.7514.2822210.8078.2910.839.27
11115.7062.1415.7214.55
10315.3068.3015.3915.10
2019.7072.129.6815.50
2026.5081.356.4516.60
Table 2. The average values (Σ) of melanoma cells and skin fibroblasts (HS27) measured at 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment with different MgO suspension concentrations. The standard deviation (σ) was reported as well.
Table 2. The average values (Σ) of melanoma cells and skin fibroblasts (HS27) measured at 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment with different MgO suspension concentrations. The standard deviation (σ) was reported as well.
Number of Live Melanoma Cells
Time (hours) Without
MgO
MgO50MgO100MgO200MgO300MgO400MgO500
0Σ7.3 × 104
σ0.14
24Σ29.16 × 10420.79 × 10417.78 × 10411.50 × 1049.98 × 1047.81 × 1046.86 × 104
σ0.510.892.860.230.110.620.39
48Σ53.64 × 10442.90 × 10430.60 × 10424.95 × 10417.75 × 10414.25 × 1046.63 × 104
σ2.213.682.540.930.491.200.92
72Σ75.65 × 10452.36 × 10445.09 × 10428.85 × 10422.40 × 10415.15 × 1047.46 × 104
σ3.612.331.232.472.182.621.40
Number of live skin fibroblasts
Time (hours) Without
MgO
MgO50MgO100MgO200MgO300MgO400MgO500
0Σ12.2 × 104
σ0.91
24Σ26.36 × 10426.67 × 10424.54 × 10428.11 × 10426.53 × 10426.57 × 10427.97 × 104
σ0.740.081.584.403.212.542.18
48Σ39.50 × 10443.50 × 10443.60 × 10440.00 × 10439.47 × 10447.86 × 10440.77 × 104
σ3.533.820.283.960.812.740.16
72Σ50.75 × 10452.30 × 10449.30 × 10451.03 × 10453.28 × 10460.90 × 10451.36 × 104
σ2.472.404.103.863.394.674.30
For each MgO suspension concentration, two tests were performed.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Daniele, V.; Volpe, A.R.; Cesare, P.; Taglieri, G. MgO Nanoparticles Obtained from an Innovative and Sustainable Route and Their Applications in Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222975

AMA Style

Daniele V, Volpe AR, Cesare P, Taglieri G. MgO Nanoparticles Obtained from an Innovative and Sustainable Route and Their Applications in Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(22):2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Daniele, Valeria, Anna Rita Volpe, Patrizia Cesare, and Giuliana Taglieri. 2023. "MgO Nanoparticles Obtained from an Innovative and Sustainable Route and Their Applications in Cancer Therapy" Nanomaterials 13, no. 22: 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222975

APA Style

Daniele, V., Volpe, A. R., Cesare, P., & Taglieri, G. (2023). MgO Nanoparticles Obtained from an Innovative and Sustainable Route and Their Applications in Cancer Therapy. Nanomaterials, 13(22), 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop