Next Article in Journal
Antibiofilm Activity of 3D-Printed Nanocomposite Resin: Impact of ZrO2 Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
The Composite TiO2–CuOx Layers Formed by Electrophoretic Method for CO2 Gas Photoreduction
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial: Core–Shell Nanostructures for Energy Storage and Conversion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Supramolecular Precursor Strategy to Construct g-C3N4/Silica Hybrid Nanosheets for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dye and Antibiotic Pollutants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/nano13030588
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Solar Light Photocatalyst Made of Ag3PO4 Coated TiO2-SiO2 Microspheres

by
Sudipto Pal
1,*,
Sanosh Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan
1,*,
Amruth Kaitheri
1,
Mauro Epifani
2 and
Antonio Licciulli
1,3,*
1
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
2
Istituto per la Microelettronica e Microsistemi, IMM-CNR, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
3
Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR Nanotec, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(3), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030588
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 27 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Composite Photocatalysts Based on Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Solar light active photocatalyst was prepared as silver phosphate (Ag3PO4) coating on titania–silica (TiO2–SiO2) microspheres. Titania–silica microsphere was obtained by spray drying TiO2–SiO2 colloidal solutions, whereas Ag3PO4 was applied by wet impregnation. XRD on the granules and SEM analysis show that the silver phosphate particles cover the surface of the titania–silica microspheres, and UV-visible diffuse reflectance analysis highlights that Ag3PO4/TiO2–SiO2 composites can absorb the entire visible light spectrum. BET measurements show higher specific surface area of the composite samples compared to bare Ag3PO4. Photocatalytic activity was evaluated by dye degradation tests under solar light irradiation. The prepared catalysts follow a pseudo-first-order rate law for dye degradation tests under solar light irradiation. The composite catalysts with an Ag3PO4/TiO2–SiO2 ratio of 1:1.6 wt% show better catalytic activity towards both rhodamine B and methylene blue degradation and compared with the results with uncoated TiO2–SiO2 microspheres and the benchmark commercial TiO2 (Evonik-P25) as a reference. The composite photocatalyst showed exceptional efficiency compared to its pristine counterparts and reference material. This is explained as having a higher surface area with optimum light absorption capacity.

1. Introduction

Purification of polluted surfaces, air, and water is pivotal for maintaining a healthy environment [1,2]. Photocatalysis can be considered a promising solution for various purification applications [3,4,5]. Many attempts have been made to produce visible light active photocatalysts for polluted air and water treatment [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Semiconductor photocatalysts are a good choice since they are highly efficient, eco-friendly, and chemically stable [13,14,15]. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most studied photocatalysts with diverse applications, owing to its excellent physical and chemical properties with higher photo and chemical stability [16,17,18,19,20]. Because of its wide band gap, TiO2 catalyst is photo-active only under UV light exposure that limits its applications [21,22,23,24]. To utilize sunlight as the radiation source, it is necessary to make the TiO2 visible light active, which also extends its use in indoor conditions where UV light is filtered by glass and LED lights are used as the light source. To make it visible light active several efforts have been reported. The most common method is to couple with noble metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, and Cu) [22,23,24], metal oxides (CuO/Cu2O, CeO2, Fe2O3, WO3 etc.), and nitrides like g-C3N4 [25,26,27,28].
The significant photo-oxidative characteristics of Ag3PO4 for producing oxygen from water and the destruction of organic contaminants under visible light irradiation make it a very promising photocatalyst [29,30,31,32,33]. In addition, silver orthophosphate possesses a lower band gap energy (2.45 eV) compared to titanium dioxide (3.2 eV) and therefore can be activated in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum, where TiO2 is idle. Despite the above-mentioned outstanding qualities; its size, cost of preparation, poor solubility in water, reduction of silver ions (Ag+) to metallic silver (Ag0) during the photocatalytic process (referred as photo-corrosion), and lower specific surface area (SSA) are some of the limitations of this compound [21,34,35]. Ag3PO4 alone as a photocatalyst also suffers from lower efficiency due to the fast recombination rate of the photo-generated charge carriers [36,37,38]. These drawbacks can be minimized by creating multiphase materials that include Ag3PO4 with semiconductors like TiO2 and carbon compounds like graphene, graphitic carbon nitride, and graphene oxide, etc. [34,39,40].
Silica supported titania could serve as an ideal substrate due to its higher thermal stability and enhanced mechanical properties, whereas TiO2–SiO2 microspheres could have the advantage of reusability due to its first precipitation and separation from the treated media [15,41]. Moreover, TiO2–SiO2 microspheres can reach high surface area and porosity, uniform shape, greater dispersion, and low cost of production [15]. As a result, they are considered to be a great carrier material. This type of material can cut the costs of the bulk silver phosphate photocatalysts as well as improve the photocatalytic activity. Additionally, the high adsorption capability of amorphous silica makes it useful in preparing supported catalysts.
In this work, efficient titania–silica microspheres/Ag3PO4 catalysts were prepared. The chemical composition, shape, and optical characteristics of the synthesized silica titania microspheres/Ag3PO4 catalysts were studied in detail. Photo degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) and methylene blue (MB) dyes as the model pollutant in water under solar radiation was used to assess the photocatalytic efficacy of the synthesized catalysts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Section

The silver orthophosphate photocatalysts were synthesized at room temperature using a co-precipitation technique, whereas titania–silica microspheres were prepared using a spray drying technique. The mesoporous TiO2–SiO2 microspheres (composition: 80 wt% TiO2/20 wt% SiO2, hence denoted as TS82) were prepared following a modified procedure described in our previous works [15,42]. A nonionic copolymer surfactant, Pluronic F127 ([C3H6O·C2H4O]x, Powder, BioReagent, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Luis, MO, USA) was used as the mesopore generating agent whereas titanium tetraisopropoxide (Ti(OiPr)4, 97%, Sigma-Aldrich) and tetraethoxysilane (Si(OC2H5)4, 97%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as the inorganic precursors for TiO2 and SiO2. A spray drying method was used to prepare the TiO2–SiO2 microspheres. Briefly, an aqueous suspension of TiO2-SiO2 (TiO2/SiO2 weight ratio of 80/20) was prepared by hydrolysis-condensation of Ti(OiPr)4 and Si(OC2H5)4 in acidic pH, which was used as the stock solution for spray drying. Then the suspension was spray dried with a high pressure atomizer (ICF Welko, commercial grade, I.C.F. & Welko S.P.A., Maranello, Italy) that resulted the production of the TS82 microspheres. Then the microspheres were calcined at 550 °C for 6 h with the heating and cooling rate of 1 °C/min to remove the organic content and enhance the crystallization of TiO2 as well. For silver phosphate coating, silver nitrate (AgNO3, Crystal, BAKER ANALYZED™ A.C.S. Reagent, J.T. Baker™, Fisher Scientific Co. L.L.C., Pittsburgh, PA 15275, USA) and di-potassium hydrogen phosphate (ACS Reagent ≥ 98%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as the precursors. Three compositions with different TS82: Ag3PO4 ratios were prepared. The weight ratios of TS82 to silver phosphate that were investigated throughout the work were 1:0.42 (TS82-AgP4), 1:0.84 (TS82-AgP8), and 1:1.68 (TS82-AgP16). TS82 powder (50 mg) was first dispersed in 100 mL water under vigorous stirring, and then the required amount of silver nitrate aqueous solution was added and stirred overnight to let the Ag+ ions be adsorbed on the surface of the TS82 microspheres. Dropwise addition of an aqueous dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4·3H2O) solution to the silver deposited TS82 suspension followed, and a yellow precipitate formed. The precipitate was centrifuged, washed several times with deionized water and ethanol, and dried at 70 °C overnight to give dried composite powder samples. In a similar approach, pure Ag3PO4 was produced by keeping the Ag/P molar ratio at 3:1. To identify the role of TiO2 in photocatalysis, pure silica microspheres/Ag3PO4 composite was also prepared following the similar method described above. Aeroxide P25 titanium dioxide nanopowder (Evonik Operations GmbH, Essen, Germany) was used as the benchmark photocatalyst for comparison.

2.2. Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku Ultima diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Akishima-shi, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiations generated at 40 kV and 20 mA. The nitrogen adsorption/ desorption measurements were performed using NOVA 2000e (Quantachrome, Anton Paar USA Inc., Timber Ridge, VA, USA) apparatus at a temperature of −196 °C. The samples were degassed for 3 h at 105 °C. The multipoint Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) technique was used to calculate the specific surface area (SSA) using adsorption data in the relative pressure range of 0.05–0.35. The UV-visible absorption spectra and diffuse reflectance spectra were measured using an Agilent Carry 5000 UV-visible-NIR spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in the wavelength range of 200 to 800 nm equipped with a standard PTFE 150 mm diameter integrating sphere. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) measurements were carried out using a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) in a diffuse reflectance setup, after dispersing the sample powders in KBr and accumulating 36 scans over 4000–400 cm−1 wavenumber range. Microstructural investigation was performed with an EVO-Zeiss (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM).

2.3. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity

Photocatalytic activity was evaluated using dye degradation tests using organic Rhodamine B (RhB) and Methylene Blue (MB) as the model pollutants. The experiments took place in a photocatalytic reactor that includes a solar simulator lamp, magnetic stirring system, and cooling apparatus. The simulation of the spectrum of natural sunlight was achieved using a 300 W tungsten lamp (Sanolux, Radium Lampenwerk, Irradiance 41.4 W m−2 at 380–780 nm; 13.6 W m−2 at 315–400 nm and 3.0 W m−2 at 280–315 nm wavelength. The photocatalysts (1 g L−1) were dispersed in 200 mL of RhB/MB aqueous solution (10 ppm) and the suspension was irradiated with solar light. The suspensions were stirred in the dark overnight before exposition to solar light to achieve the adsorption–desorption equilibrium. The photocatalytic degradation of RhB and MB was monitored by measuring the intensity of the dyes’ absorption bands at 554 and 650 nm, respectively. An Agilent Cary 5000 series UV-visible spectrophotometer was used to record the absorption spectra of the irradiated solution. The solution was tested at certain time intervals and separated from the catalysts by centrifugation before the spectrum measurement.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of TS82, AgP, and TS82-AgP composites with different TS82: AgP ratios. XRD patterns of TS82 show monophasic anatase crystalline phase corresponding to crystalline peaks at 2θ values of 25.38°, 37.04°, 48.12°, 54.36°, and 62.7° assigned to (101), (004), (200), (211), and (204) crystalline planes of the anatase TiO2 (JCPDS no. 84-1286). The diffraction pattern of the TS82 microspheres does not show any evident peak corresponding to silica, as it forms an amorphous phase. The indexed diffraction peaks of pure silver phosphate (AgP) show the formation of body-centered cubic silver phosphate (JCPDS No. 84-0512). The crystalline peaks of silver phosphate at 2θ values of 20.93°, 29.88°, 33.31°, 36.69°, 42.65°, 47.94°, 52.73°, 55.15°, 57.35°, and 61.79° assigned to (110), (200), (210), (211), (220), (310), (222), (320), (321), and (400) crystalline planes respectively. All the synthesized TS82/AgP composite catalysts show peaks ascribed to both AgP and anatase titania nanocrystalline phases, confirming the formation of TS82/AgP composites without any intermediate phase.
The morphology of Ag3PO4 and TS82 microspheres is presented with the SEM micrograph (Figure 2a,b, respectively). The Ag3PO4 particles have an irregular and polyhedral morphology and exist in an aggregated state. From Figure 2b, it is clear that TS82 microparticles possess spherical morphology and smooth surfaces. Some spheres are in a broken state, unveiling the hollow nature of the microspheres. The size of the TS82 could be estimated in the range of submicron to 5 μm. The SEM micrograph of the composite catalyst TS82/AgP16 in Figure 2c shows that the Ag3PO4 nanoparticles are uniformly distributed on the surface of TS82 microspheres and titania silica microspheres are decorated with Ag3PO4 nanoparticles with an average size of 40 nm (inset of Figure 2d). It is also noteworthy to observe that in case of pristine Ag3PO4, aggregated particles of 200 to 300 nm were formed due to rapid nucleation in the reaction solution leading to crystal growth [43]. However, this feature is absent in the composite material indicating that the TS82 microspheres act as nucleation controlling medium leading to nearly uniform distribution of the small sized (~50 nm) Ag3PO4 nanoparticles. Initial adsorption of the Ag+ ions on negatively charged TiO2–SiO2 surfaces could promote the limited nucleation of the Ag3PO4 nanoparticles.
The SSA of the samples obtained from N2 adsorption isotherm by BET measurements are reported in Table 1. It is evident that the optimum amount of silica addition to TiO2 nanostructure results in the formation of mesoporous structures showing higher SSA that enhance the overall photocatalytic efficiency [41,42] In this work, the highest SSA was found for the TS82 microspheres (173 m2/g), which was used as a support catalyst of Ag3PO4 which has a very low SSA of 4.1 m2/g. The composites TS82-AgP4, TS82-AgP8, and TS82-AgP16 showed a surface area of 114, 109 and 98 m2/g, respectively. For the composite catalysts, a decrease in surface area with the increase in AgP amount can be observed, which is in agreement with the individual SSA of TS82 and Ag3PO4.
Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra of the composite samples (TS82-AgP4, TS82-AgP8, and TS82-AgP16) along with their pristine counterpart (AgP and TS82). All the samples show a broad vibrational band centered at 3400 cm−1 that corresponds to O–H stretching vibration, while the peak at 1657 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of the adsorbed water molecules [21]. Pure Ag3PO4 shows strong vibrations centered around 1000 cm−1 and 547 cm−1 that arise from P–O asymmetric stretching vibrations and P–O–P bending vibrations arising from PO 4 3 – group of silver phosphate [21,44]. On the other hand, TS82 shows distinct vibration bands centered at 1092 cm−1 due to Si–O–Si asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the silica network [42,45]. With the increasing amount of Ag3PO4 in the composite, the peak intensity of silica decreases, while that for phosphates increases, indicating the formation of TS82-AgP composites.
The optical diffuse reflectance absorption spectra of different samples are shown in Figure 4a. All the spectra were recorded in the UV-visible range to determine the light absorption capacity and the optical band gap of each composition. The detailed calculation procedure is described elsewhere [21]. TS82 sample shows strong absorption in the UV region whereas there is no absorption in the visible region, indicating its inactivity in the visible region. The pure Ag3PO4 sample shows strong absorption starting from UV to the visible wavelength range centered at 460 nm and broad absorption in the 500–800 wavelength range. With the deposition of Ag3PO4 on TS82 microspheres, strong absorption in the visible region (400–800 nm) is observed with the absorption peak at 460 nm. With increasing loading of Ag3PO4, the intensity of the absorption peak also increases, indicating higher visible light absorption with increasing Ag3PO4 content. This is further confirmed from the band gap energy measurements that are reported in Table 1 derived from Figure 4b.
Table
Table 1. BET surface area and band gap determination of different composites.
Table 1. BET surface area and band gap determination of different composites.
SamplesBET Surface Area (m2/g)Band Gap Energy (eV) 1
TS821733.18
AgP4.12.41
TS82-AgP41142.52
TS82-AgP81092.48
TS82-AgP16982.45
1 Obtained from Figure 4b.
The photocatalytic activity of TS82-AgP samples has been studied using dye degradation techniques in the presence of solar radiation. The spectral evolution of the absorption band of RhB and MB in the presence of different photocatalyst is presented in Figures S1 and S2. A significant amount of adsorption was observed in the case of composite samples (more prominent for MB). The C/C0 vs. reaction time with RhB and MB dyes has been plotted where C0 represents the initial concentration and C represents the concentration of the dye solution with respect to the exposure duration (Figure 5). Evonik-P25 is used as a reference photocatalyst for the comparative study of the photocatalytic properties of the aforementioned dyes. The photodegradation process for both dyes followed pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics and a pseudo-first-order rate constant (K). The maximum rate constant value is found for the TS82-AgP16 composite in both cases. It is clearly evident from the graph that the composites have much better photocatalytic efficiencies than the pure TS82 and pure AgP. There is an increase in the slope of the curve for composites, which indicates the enhancement of the photocatalytic property. The photocatalytic reaction rate constant for all the samples for RhB and MB degradation is reported in Table 2. It is observed that there is a considerable increase in the rate constant of the composites as the concentration of AgP is increased and reaches its maximum for TS82-AgP16, which indicates the excellent photocatalytic behavior of TS82-AgP16. We did not observe any further increase in photocatalytic efficiency by increasing the amount of Ag3PO4. The rate constant (K) of TS82-AgP16 is found to be 12.6 × 10−2 min-1 and 4.84 × 10−2 min-1 for RhB and MB degradation, respectively. The rate constants of all composites are greater than the rate constants of pure TS82 and AgP. It is assumed that, with increasing AgP content, the photocatalytic efficiency also increased due to the higher visible light absorption capacity of TS82-AgP16 (Figure 3b), but further increase results decrease in photocatalytic activity (data not shown) that might be due to lower SSA and formation of separated AgP clusters. We also investigated the photocatalytic activity of Ag3PO4 deposited on SiO2 microspheres prepared in a similar way to TS82 microspheres. Poor photocatalytic efficiency reported in Figure S3, Table S1 indicates that TiO2 in the composite samples may play a significant role in photocatalytic dye degradation.
A possible reaction pathway of the photodegradation process based on the experimental results obtained is depicted in Figure 6. It is evident that the photocatalytic mechanism of the Ag3PO4-TiO2 composites with different morphologies is well reported [38,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. According to the previous reports, the alignment of the valance band (VB) and conduction band (CB) of Ag3PO4-TiO2 heterostructure favors the electron-hole charge separation that accelerates the photocatalytic process [46,50]. In our system, when the solar light falls on the composite photocatalyst, the electrons in VB are excited to the CB of Ag3PO4 leaving the holes in the VB. Since the VB position (+2.9 eV vs. NHE) of Ag3PO4 is lower than TiO2 (VB position +2.7 eV vs. NHE), the holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 can be quickly transferred to the VB of TiO2 (hence TiO2/SiO2) thus creating the charge separation. Mesoporous TiO2/SiO2 microstructure may also act as a hole trapping agent that inhibits the carrier recombination favoring the photocatalytic process. These valence band holes may come into direct contact with the water molecules adsorbed by the composite catalyst, resulting in the formation of hydroxyl radicals. These radicals play a major role in the degradation of RhB and MB. On the other hand, the photo-generated electrons in Ag3PO4 can migrate to the Ag3PO4 surface and interact with the adsorbed water molecules to generate oxide species such as reactive superoxide radical anions. It is unlikely that the excited electrons in CB of Ag3PO4 would transfer to the CB of TiO2 since CB of TiO2 (−0.5 eV vs. NHE) is more negative than CB of Ag3PO4 (0.45 eV vs. NHE) [47,49,51,52]. Rather, some photo-excited electrons may jump to Ag3PO4 CB due to the absorption edge of TiO2 at 380 nm that may arise from the irradiance of the solar lamp, which also emits low intensity UV-A and UB-B lights. This is supported by the poor photocatalytic activity of the Ag3PO4-SiO2 composite compared to Ag3PO4-TiO2/SiO2 (Figure S3, Table S1). The maximum activity of the TS82-AgP16 composite is attributed to an efficient charge separation mechanism and a larger surface area than pure silver phosphate.

4. Conclusions

Efficient tandem photocatalysts with silver phosphate deposited on titania–silica microspheres were synthesized for solar light driven photocatalytic processes. The composite catalysts proved to be very different from both the titania–silica microsphere and silver phosphate alone in many respects. The energy band gap of titania–silica microsphere from the UV region shifted to the visible range in the case of composite catalyst. To explain the better performance of the composite catalysts, we suggest that photogenerated electrons in the conduction band of silver phosphate are transported to the TS82 surface where they combine with atmospheric oxygen to create reactive superoxide radical anions, whereas holes may come into direct contact with the water molecules, resulting in the formation of hydroxyl radicals. An optimum level of AgP loading on titania–silica microspheres resulted in higher specific surface area with higher visible light absorption capacity that makes the composite catalysts much more efficient. The higher surface of the composite is converted to a higher number of reaction sites for the catalyst for the dye molecules, increased light absorption, and accelerated the photo-degradation reaction. Moreover, the micrometric size of the TS82 microspheres make it easy to collect by filtration. This supported system can be easily scaled up and eventually extended to other supports.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13030588/s1, Figure S1. Evolution of the UV-visible absorption spectra of RhB dye aqueous solution (10 ppm) under solar light irradiation performed with different photocatalyst samples as indicated in the figure title; Figure S2. Evolution of the UV-visible absorption spectra of MB dye aqueous solution (10 ppm) under solar light irradiation performed with different photocatalyst samples as indicated in the figure. Figure S3. Plot of C/C0 with reaction time performed with SiO2-AgP16 and TS82-AgP16 microsphere composite using (a) RhB and (b) MB dye Table S1. Photocatalytic reaction rate constant of the corresponding samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P. and S.K.P.; methodology, S.K.P. and S.P.; software, S.P., S.K.P. and A.K..; validation, S.P., S.K.P. and A.L.; formal analysis, S.P., S.K.P. and M.E.; investigation, S.P., S.K.P. and A.L.; data curation, S.P., S.K.P. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P., S.K.P. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.P., S.K.P., M.E. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thankfully acknowledge Fabio Marzo for performing the FESEM measurements and Donato Cannoletta for recording the wide angle XRD spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weng, C.-H. Environmental Concerns and Pollution Control in the Context of Developing Countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 46085–46088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ollis, D.F. Photocatalytic Purification and Remediation of Contaminated Air and Water. Comptes Rendus Académie Sci.-Ser. IIC-Chem. 2000, 3, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pham, H.D.; Tekalgne, M.A.; Do, H.H.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Cheng, C.K.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Nguyen, C.C.; Singh, P.; Raizada, P.; et al. Emerging Photocatalysts for Air Purification. Mater. Lett. 2021, 288, 129355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Bai, L.; Li, Z.; Qu, Y.; Jing, L. Review of Strategies for the Fabrication of Heterojunctional Nanocomposites as Efficient Visible-Light Catalysts by Modulating Excited Electrons with Appropriate Thermodynamic Energy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 10879–10897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cermenati, L.; Pichat, P.; Guillard, C.; Albini, A. Probing the TiO2 Photocatalytic Mechanisms in Water Purification by Use of Quinoline, Photo-Fenton Generated OH • Radicals and Superoxide Dismutase. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, J.-W.; Gao, Z.-D.; Han, K.; Liu, Y.; Song, Y.-Y. Synthesis of Magnetically Separable Ag3PO4/TiO2/Fe3O4 Heterostructure with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance under Visible Light for Photoinactivation of Bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 15122–15131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gunti, S.; Kumar, A.; Ram, M.K. Nanostructured Photocatalysis in the Visible Spectrum for the Decontamination of Air and Water. Int. Mater. Rev. 2018, 63, 257–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shifu, C.; Gengyu, C. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organophosphorus Pesticides Using Floating Photocatalyst TiO2·SiO2/Beads by Sunlight. Sol. Energy 2005, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Djurišić, A.B.; He, Y.; Ng, A.M.C. Visible-Light Photocatalysts: Prospects and Challenges. APL Mater. 2020, 8, 030903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Molinari, R.; Lavorato, C.; Argurio, P. Visible-Light Photocatalysts and Their Perspectives for Building Photocatalytic Membrane Reactors for Various Liquid Phase Chemical Conversions. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mutalik, C.; Krisnawati, D.I.; Patil, S.B.; Khafid, M.; Atmojo, D.S.; Santoso, P.; Lu, S.-C.; Wang, D.-Y.; Kuo, T.-R. Phase-Dependent MoS2 Nanoflowers for Light-Driven Antibacterial Application. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 7904–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, S.; Feng, J.; Fan, M.; Pi, Y.; Hu, L.; Han, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, J.; Sun, J. Recent Developments in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Water Treatment Using Visible Light-Responsive Photocatalysts: A Review. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 14610–14630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mills, A.; Davies, R.H.; Worsley, D. Water Purification by Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mills, A.; Le Hunte, S. An Overview of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 1997, 108, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pal, S.; Laera, A.M.; Licciulli, A.; Catalano, M.; Taurino, A. Biphase TiO2 Microspheres with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7931–7938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shifu, C.; Gengyu, C. The Effect of Different Preparation Conditions on the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2·SiO2/Beads. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 200, 3637–3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Green, M.; Just, M.; Li, Y.Y.; Chen, X. Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials for Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 193003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ijaz, M.; Zafar, M. Titanium Dioxide Nanostructures as Efficient Photocatalyst: Progress, Challenges and Perspective. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 3569–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Ceglie, C.; Pal, S.; Murgolo, S.; Licciulli, A.; Mascolo, G. Investigation of Photocatalysis by Mesoporous Titanium Dioxide Supported on Glass Fibers as an Integrated Technology for Water Remediation. Catalysts 2022, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Padmanabhan, S.K.; Pal, S.; Licciulli, A. Diatomite/Silver Phosphate Composite for Efficient Degradation of Organic Dyes under Solar Radiation. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2020, 43, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lang, J.; Takahashi, K.; Kubo, M.; Shimada, M. Ag-Doped TiO2 Composite Films Prepared Using Aerosol-Assisted, Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition. Catalysts 2022, 12, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gordon, W.; Balboa, A.; Giles, S.; Epshteyn, A.; Ávalos-Ovando, O.; Govorov, A.; McEntee, M.; Baturina, O. Visible Light-Induced Reactivity of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles Incorporated into TiO2 Matrix towards 2-Chloroethyl Ethyl Sulfide. Crystals 2021, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mathew, S.; Ganguly, P.; Rhatigan, S.; Kumaravel, V.; Byrne, C.; Hinder, S.J.; Bartlett, J.; Nolan, M.; Pillai, S.C. Cu-Doped TiO2: Visible Light Assisted Photocatalytic Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zuliani, A.; Cova, C.M. Green Synthesis of Heterogeneous Visible-Light-Active Photocatalysts: Recent Advances. Photochem 2021, 1, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vieira, G.B.; José, H.J.; Peterson, M.; Baldissarelli, V.Z.; Alvarez, P.; de Fátima Peralta Muniz Moreira, R. CeO2/TiO2 Nanostructures Enhance Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Compounds in Aqueous Suspension. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2018, 353, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghasemy-Piranloo, F.; Dadashian, S.; Bavarsiha, F. Synthesis of Fe3O4/SiO2/TiO2-Ag Photo-Catalytic Nano-Structures with an Effective Silica Shell for Degradation of Methylene Blue. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 3740–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diez-Cabanes, V.; Morales-García, Á.; Illas, F.; Pastore, M. Tuning the Interfacial Energetics in WO3/WO3 and WO3/TiO2 Heterojunctions by Nanostructure Morphological Engineering. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 11528–11533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yi, Z.; Ye, J.; Kikugawa, N.; Kako, T.; Ouyang, S.; Stuart-Williams, H.; Yang, H.; Cao, J.; Luo, W.; Li, Z.; et al. An Orthophosphate Semiconductor with Photooxidation Properties under Visible-Light Irradiation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, C.; Chen, X.; Li, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Yao, L.; Lin, K.; Lai, Y.; Deng, X. Ag3PO4-Based Photocatalysts and Their Application in Organic-Polluted Wastewater Treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 18423–18439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, X.; Xu, P.; Chen, M.; Zeng, G.; Wang, D.; Chen, F.; Tang, W.; Chen, C.; Zhang, C.; Tan, X. Application of Silver Phosphate-Based Photocatalysts: Barriers and Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 366, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dinh, C.-T.; Nguyen, T.-D.; Kleitz, F.; Do, T.-O. Large-Scale Synthesis of Uniform Silver Orthophosphate Colloidal Nanocrystals Exhibiting High Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7797–7799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martin, D.J.; Liu, G.; Moniz, S.J.A.; Bi, Y.; Beale, A.M.; Ye, J.; Tang, J. Efficient Visible Driven Photocatalyst, Silver Phosphate: Performance, Understanding and Perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7808–7828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Raza, N.; Raza, W.; Gul, H.; Azam, M.; Lee, J.; Vikrant, K.; Kim, K.-H. Solar-Light-Active Silver Phosphate/Titanium Dioxide/Silica Heterostructures for Photocatalytic Removal of Organic Dye. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, X.; Tang, H.; Xu, J.; Antonietti, M.; Shalom, M. Silver Phosphate/Graphitic Carbon Nitride as an Efficient Photocatalytic Tandem System for Oxygen Evolution. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, J.; Zhou, X.; Ma, L.; Xu, L.; Xu, X.; Du, Z.; Zhang, J. Enhancing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity of Direct Z-Scheme SnS2/Ag3PO4 Heterojunction Photocatalysts. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 81, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bi, Y.; Ouyang, S.; Cao, J.; Ye, J. Facile Synthesis of Rhombic Dodecahedral AgX/Ag3PO4 (X = Cl, Br, I) Heterocrystals with Enhanced Photocatalytic Properties and Stabilities. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 10071–10075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, J.; Yang, Y.; He, H.; Cheng, D.; Mao, M.; Jiang, Q.; Song, L.; Xiong, J. Facile Synthesis of Hierarchical Ag3PO4/TiO2 Nanofiber Heterostructures with Highly Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amedlous, A.; Majdoub, M.; Amaterz, E.; Anfar, Z.; Benlhachemi, A. Synergistic Effect of G-C3N4 Nanosheets/Ag3PO4 Microcubes as Efficient n-p-Type Heterostructure Based Photoanode for Photoelectrocatalytic Dye Degradation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2021, 409, 113127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, X.; Cui, H.; Li, Y.; Qin, J.; Zhang, R.; Tang, H. Fabrication of Ag3PO4-Graphene Composites with Highly Efficient and Stable Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pal, S.; Taurino, A.; Catalano, M.; Licciulli, A. Block Copolymer and Cellulose Templated Mesoporous TiO2–SiO2 Nanocomposite as Superior Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2022, 12, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liciulli, A.; Nisi, R.; Pal, S.; Laera, A.M.; Creti, P.; Chiechi, A. Photo-Oxidation of Ethylene over Mesoporous TiO2/SiO2 Catalysts. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 30, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Yin, S.; Guo, X.; Qin, W. Room-Temperature Synthesis of Ag3PO4 Nanoparticles with the Assistance of Trisodium Citrate for Photocatalytic Dye Degradation. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 8874–8880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Santos, R.K.; Martins, T.A.; Silva, G.N.; Conceição, M.V.S.; Nogueira, I.C.; Longo, E.; Botelho, G. Ag3PO4/NiO Composites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Visible Light. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21651–21661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Padmanabhan, S.K.; Pal, S.; Ul Haq, E.; Licciulli, A. Nanocrystalline TiO2–Diatomite Composite Catalysts: Effect of Crystallization on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2014, 485, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rawal, S.B.; Sung, S.D.; Lee, W.I. Novel Ag3PO4/TiO2 Composites for Efficient Decomposition of Gaseous 2-Propanol under Visible-Light Irradiation. Catal. Commun. 2012, 17, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yao, W.; Zhang, B.; Huang, C.; Ma, C.; Song, X.; Xu, Q. Synthesis and Characterization of High Efficiency and Stable Ag3PO4/TiO2 Visible Light Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B Solutions. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 4050–4055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tang, C.; Liu, E.; Fan, J.; Hu, X.; Kang, L.; Wan, J. Heterostructured Ag3PO4/TiO2 Nano-Sheet Film with High Efficiency for Photodegradation of Methylene Blue. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 15447–15453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, F.-M.; Pan, L.; Wang, S.; Deng, Q.; Zou, J.-J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X. Ag3PO4/TiO2 Composite for Efficient Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants under Visible Light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 317, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.; Yu, L.; Li, N.; Yan, W.; Li, X. Heterostructures of Ag3PO4/TiO2 Mesoporous Spheres with Highly Efficient Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 450, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nyankson, E.; Efavi, J.K.; Agyei-Tuffour, B.; Manu, G. Synthesis of TiO2–Ag3PO4 Photocatalyst Material with High Adsorption Capacity and Photocatalytic Activity: Application in the Removal of Dyes and Pesticides. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 17032–17045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Huang, C.; Yao, W.; Wu, Q.; Xu, Q. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Ultrafine Ag3PO4 Nanoparticles on Oxygen Vacated TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 205, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of TS82, pure Ag3PO4 (AgP), and composites with different TS82/AgP ratios.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of TS82, pure Ag3PO4 (AgP), and composites with different TS82/AgP ratios.
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g001
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) TS82, (c) TS82-AgP16 and (d) higher magnification image of TS82-AgP16.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) TS82, (c) TS82-AgP16 and (d) higher magnification image of TS82-AgP16.
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g003 550
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) TS82-AgP4, (c) TS82-AgP8, (d) TS82-AgP16, and (e) TS82 microspheres.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a) Ag3PO4, (b) TS82-AgP4, (c) TS82-AgP8, (d) TS82-AgP16, and (e) TS82 microspheres.
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Optical absorption spectra of different samples and (b) Plot of (Ahv)1/2 against the incident photon energy (eV) calculated from the absorption spectra plotted in (a).
Figure 4. (a) Optical absorption spectra of different samples and (b) Plot of (Ahv)1/2 against the incident photon energy (eV) calculated from the absorption spectra plotted in (a).
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g004
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g005 550
Figure 5. Plot of C/C0 versus reaction time (solar light irradiation time) of different photocatalyst samples performed with (a) RhB and (b) MB dye solutions.
Figure 5. Plot of C/C0 versus reaction time (solar light irradiation time) of different photocatalyst samples performed with (a) RhB and (b) MB dye solutions.
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g005
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the enhanced photodegradation mechanism of the Ag3PO4/TiO2–SiO2 nanocomposite under solar light irradiation.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the enhanced photodegradation mechanism of the Ag3PO4/TiO2–SiO2 nanocomposite under solar light irradiation.
Nanomaterials 13 00588 g006
Table
Table 2. Photocatalytic reaction rate constants of RhB and MB dye degradation under solar light.
Table 2. Photocatalytic reaction rate constants of RhB and MB dye degradation under solar light.
PhotocatalystsRhBMB
* K (10−2)* K (10−2)
TS820.160.649
AgP1.464.0
TS82-AgP43.242.0
TS82-AgP88.552.14
TS82-AgP1612.64.84
Evonik-P251.841.35
* Reaction rate constant, min−1; average of three measurements of each photocatalyst.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pal, S.; Padmanabhan, S.K.; Kaitheri, A.; Epifani, M.; Licciulli, A. Efficient Solar Light Photocatalyst Made of Ag3PO4 Coated TiO2-SiO2 Microspheres. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030588

AMA Style

Pal S, Padmanabhan SK, Kaitheri A, Epifani M, Licciulli A. Efficient Solar Light Photocatalyst Made of Ag3PO4 Coated TiO2-SiO2 Microspheres. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(3):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pal, Sudipto, Sanosh Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan, Amruth Kaitheri, Mauro Epifani, and Antonio Licciulli. 2023. "Efficient Solar Light Photocatalyst Made of Ag3PO4 Coated TiO2-SiO2 Microspheres" Nanomaterials 13, no. 3: 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop