Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Evaluation of Peptide–Manganese Dioxide Nanocomposites as Adsorbents for the Removal of Strontium Ions
Next Article in Special Issue
LDH/MXene Synergistic Carrier Separation Effects to Improve the Photoelectric Catalytic Activities of Bi2WO6 Nanosheet Arrays
Previous Article in Journal
SCAPS-1D Modeling of Hydrogenated Lead-Free Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite Solar Cells with a Remarkable Efficiency of 26.3%
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Synthesis of Coumarin Derivatives Using Visible-Light-Responsive Strawberry Dye-Sensitized Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Proprieties of BiFeO3-Based Materials

by
Yassine Nassereddine
,
Manal Benyoussef
,
Bouchra Asbani
,
Mimoun El Marssi
and
Mustapha Jouiad
*
Laboratory of Physics of Condensed Matter, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Scientific Pole, 33 Rue Saint-Leu, CEDEX 1, 80039 Amiens, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14010051
Submission received: 3 December 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 21 December 2023 / Published: 23 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Photocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Owing to their remarkable success in photocatalytic applications, multiferroic BiFeO3 and its derivatives have gained a highly promising position as electrode materials for future developments of efficient catalysts. In addition to their appropriate band gaps, these materials exhibit inherent intrinsic polarizations enabling efficient charge carrier separation and their high mobility without the need for additional co-catalysts. Here, we review the existing strategies for enhancing the photocatalytic performances of BiFeO3-based materials and we describe the physico-chemical properties at the origin of their exceptional photocatalytic behavior. A special focus is paid to the degradation of organic pollutants and water splitting, both driven through photocatalysis to unveil the correlation between BiFeO3 size, substitution, and doping on the one hand and the photocatalytic performances on the other hand. Finally, we provide practical recommendations for future developments of high-performing BiFeO3-based electrodes.

1. Introduction

The global energy crisis and climate change are driven by the continuously growing world population and industrialization, which are heavily weighing on the future of human well-being and safety [1]. Nowadays, although fossil fuels represent more than 80% of the world’s energy consumption [2], an increased consciousness among policymakers and the population is emerging for taking urgent measures and actions to cope with CO2 footprints. Alternative clean energy sources hold strong potential to overcome environmental issues by limiting the use of fossil fuels. Hydrogen (H2) is a promising energy carrier and green fuel source capable of replacing the energy generated from non-renewable resources such as oil, coal, and natural gas [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. H2 is produced using a variety of methods, including water thermolysis, electrolysis, methane-steam reforming, biofuel reforming, gasification, plasma arc decomposition, and the thermochemical conversion of biomass [14,15,16]. Recently, water splitting using solar irradiation has emerged as a promising process for H2 production, attracting considerable interest in the scientific and industrial communities. Solar-induced water splitting (WS) techniques that are classified include photocatalysis (PC), photoelectrochemical (PEC), and photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical (PV-PEC) systems [17,18,19]. PC systems correspond to a simple and low-cost process in which photocatalyst particles are dispersed in water for H2 production under light irradiation. Nevertheless, PC systems exhibit very low solar-to-H2 efficiency (STH), requiring highly selective materials for separating the produced H2 and O2 gases [20,21,22,23]. PV-PEC systems are very effective for WS owing to their high overall efficiency [24]. However, their high cost and the need for advanced technical expertise constitute two major drawbacks [25]. PEC systems are the most promising techniques for producing H2 in an easy, affordable, and sustainable way [26,27,28]. A typical PEC WS system is composed of semiconducting photoelectrodes, an electrolyte, a counter electrode, and a light source [29]. It features the combination of solar energy and water electrolysis in a single reactor with an STH efficiency of up to 12.4%. In addition, a PEC system does not require gas separation since H2 and O2 are already produced in two spatially distinct compartments [30]. It is worth noting that three essential criteria must be established for an effective and sustainable PEC. First, the semiconductor electrode material must exhibit a suitable band gap (~1.8 eV) [31], which is essential for achieving good band edge alignment concerning water redox potentials. Unfortunately, the best known good WS photocatalyst has a wide band gap energy that restricts light absorption, thus leading to weak photocatalytic performance [32,33]. Second, the semiconductor must be photo-corrosion resistant during its exposure to aqueous solutions and irradiation to avoid the formation of defects and the alteration of its photocatalytic properties while in use, which can lead to lower efficiency and a shorter lifespan [34,35]. Third, the charge transfer and separation in the semiconductor must be favorable and not hindered by the semiconductor’s surface overpotential. Recall that free electrons generated in the conduction band (CB) of the semiconductor (photoanode) will travel to the photocathode to drive the water reduction and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Holes generated in the valence band (VB) of the photoanodes will induce an oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Therefore, the ease of charge transfer and the separation of electron holes in the semiconductor material are crucial for improving the overall efficiency of the PEC WS process [36]. To date, several metal oxides have been used as semiconductors in PEC cells for WS, such as TiO2, ZnO, α-Fe2O3, and WO3 [37,38,39,40]. TiO2 is among the most widely used materials owing to its advantageous properties, including high stability and wide band gap (~3.2 eV) [41]. However, its high electron–hole recombination rate, high cost, and low visible light absorption limit its use in PEC-WS cells [42,43].
Recently, oxide perovskite materials (PMs) have attracted great attention for their use in PEC WS owing to their high photocatalytic properties, broadband absorption, low cost, facile synthesis, and well-controlled composition and morphology [44,45]. Moreover, their ferroelectric properties could promote their photocatalytic activity [46,47] as the intrinsic polarization in ferroelectric materials significantly contributes to reducing losses due to electron–hole recombination and back reactions in the system, which will increase the STH efficiency [48]. Additionally, the use of ferroelectric materials with a high dielectric constant can lead to a further increase in the charge separation efficiency, notably enhancing the photocatalytic activity [49]. However, more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between ferroelectric properties and photocatalytic activity.
Nowadays, the increasing global need for water resources coupled with their dwindling availability has emerged as a significant global concern [50]. While recycling wastewater has been suggested as a solution to address water scarcity, the presence of harmful organic substances like pesticides, phenols, and organic dyes in wastewater has raised multiple concerns regarding its environmental impact [51]. Practical solutions and strategies have been adopted to achieve more sustainable water resources. Since solar energy is one of the most accessible renewable energy sources, it makes sense to use it in combating waste degradation by synthesizing materials that can be put to direct use [52]. The development of an innovative technology, known as waste degradation through photocatalysis, is currently underway to address the issue of harmful pollutants. This process involves harnessing the power of light to initiate a chemical reaction in a photocatalyst material resulting in the conversion of these pollutants into less toxic or non-toxic substances. When exposed to light, electron–hole pairs are generated by the photocatalyst, which can serve as potent oxidizing or reducing agents. These electron–hole pairs can subsequently undergo reactions with water or oxygen molecules, leading to the creation of highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), superoxide radicals (•O2), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [53]. These ROS can be employed to facilitate the breakdown of organic and inorganic pollutants in waste materials, ultimately transforming them into simpler and less harmful compounds. Nonetheless, a recent development has sparked significant interest in a novel set of materials categorized within the perovskite structure class, particularly for their potential applications in photodegradation [54].
For instance, PbTiO3 is regarded as a potential material for photocatalytic applications due to its promising properties since its internal electric field could ensure an effective charge separation and prevent electron–hole recombination [55]. However, lead is a toxic element with known environmental effects [56]. In this sense, lead-free BiFeO3 (BFO) could be considered a potential multiferroic material with a high spontaneous polarization value of P~90 μC·cm−2 [57,58]. BFO has been widely used in various applications, including organics degradation, air purification, and H2 production (i.e., as a photoanode) [59,60,61]. In addition, BFO exhibits a high absorption coefficient in the visible region and relative stability under photocatalytic conditions [62]. Yet, the band alignment of BFO needs to be tuned to the water redox potentials to increase the STH [63]. To enhance the photocatalytic activity of BFO, several strategies were employed, such as doping/co-doping, size control, surface modification, co-catalysts, and heterostructures [64,65,66,67,68].
This review covers a large spectrum of strategies used to enhance the photocatalytic performances of BFO-based materials made by alloying, substitution, doping, and heterostructures. It aims to highlight efficient routes for improving the photocatalytic properties of BFO-based materials and to provide practical recommendations.

2. Bismuth Ferrite

Recent years have witnessed a spurring interest in BFO as a highly promising photocatalyst material owing to its outstanding crystalline structure and ferroelectric properties. This interest is reflected by the remarkably increasing number of studies published in BFO-based materials since 2010, as shown in Figure 1a. BFO has a rhombohedral R3c crystal structure at room temperature (Figure 1b) with unique multiferroic characteristics. Namely, it exhibits both ferroelectric Curie temperature (TC = 830 °C) and antiferromagnetic Neel temperature (TN = 370 °C) properties, demonstrating ferroelectric coupling and magnetoelectric effects [69,70]. These properties enhance its capacity to efficiently separate charge carriers, which is essential to make BFO catalytically active in ultrasonic and magnetic fields [71]. They also contribute to its exceptional magnetic recycling properties and chemical stability. Moreover, BFO exhibits a relatively narrow band gap in the visible light spectrum in the range between 2.0 eV and 2.7 eV [72,73,74]. These characteristics drive superior photocatalytic performances compared with various other perovskite materials. In our previous work, we used density functional theory to show the strong hybridization between Bi 6s, Fe 3d, and O 2p orbitals [72]. It is worth noting that the strong hybridization between Bi 6s and O 2p orbitals makes BFO highly oxidizing and promotes outstanding charge mobility [75].
Apart from these characteristics, the key property required in a photocatalyst material for efficient water splitting is the appropriate band alignment with water’s redox potentials. It was previously demonstrated that BFO presents a good alignment with the oxidation potential of water, suggesting an effective O2 evolution reaction (OER) [76]. Nonetheless, lowering its conduction band minimum (ECB) below the EH+/H2 energy remains needed to enable an efficient H2 evolution reaction (HER) (Figure 1c) [76]. This requirement has driven numerous research efforts for enhancing BFO photocatalytic characteristics to achieve more efficient and substantial H2 production. The strategies adopted for this purpose include investigating the effects of the elaboration technique, dimensionality/size, doping and substitution, and heterostructure [77]. Next, we will detail some of these strategies and compare their efficiencies.

2.1. Size Effect

The physical properties of multiferroic BFO-based materials are strongly dependent on a variety of parameters, such as grain and particle sizes, dopants, and substitutions. These parameters, usually affected by the fabrication method, could be tailored toward desired properties for targeted applications. Extensive research has been reported on the particle size effect on BFO’s physical properties such as its dielectric constant (ԑr) and remanent polarization (Pr), as summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2. The dielectric permittivity (ɛr) and remanent polarization (Pr) are critical parameters in ferroelectric materials, playing an important role in photocatalytic applications by facilitating effective charge separation and mobility [78]. Note that ɛr defines the material’s electrical polarizability, while Pr indicates the material’s ability to retain polarization even without an external electric field. For ferroelectric materials based on photocatalysis, these characteristics contribute to the creation of a built-in electric field promoting electron-and-hole separation and enabling them to migrate towards opposite polarities. This additional driving force is essential to prevent e-h recombination and back reactions within the system, thereby significantly enhancing the photocatalytic performances of the materials [79]. Large Pr values (~40 μC·cm−2) were reported for bulk BFO ceramics [80], while single crystals grown using the flow method exhibited high Pr values (~75 μC·cm−2) with low leakage currents [81]. Similarly, highly resistive single-phase ferro electromagnetic BFO ceramics (particle size of 0.5–1 µm) were fabricated using a rapid liquid phase sintering technique at 880 °C for 450 s. These ceramics exhibited saturated ferroelectric hysteresis loops indicating a remanent polarization of ~8.9 µC·cm−2 at room temperature [82].
The elaboration of BFO ceramics (grain size of ~200 nm) exhibiting dielectric constants and of the remanent polarization of 25 (RT/102 Hz) and 7.5 μC·cm−2, respectively, have been reported using a hybrid fabrication method involving spark plasma sintering and conventional solid-state synthesis techniques associated with high energy milling [83]. Moreover, using glycine as a chelating agent, a high-purity BFO single-phase can be obtained with a reduced calcination time. The resulting BFO powders with a particle size of ~39.7 nm exhibited a high dielectric constant of ~1118 at 42 Hz at room temperature (RT) [84]. Furthermore, BFO nanoparticles (NPs) with an average size of ~12 nm synthesized through the sol–gel method, were reported with a dielectric constant and a remanent polarization of ~84.53 (RT/102 Hz) and ~8.2 µC·cm−2, respectively [85]. Solvothermal techniques, using hexa-methylenetetramine as a precipitating agent with different concentrations, were employed to synthesize nanometric BFO powder with a very high dielectric constant value of ~4000 (RT/102 Hz) and a high remanent polarization of ~6.65 µC·cm−2 [86].

2.2. Doping and Substitution Effects

Doping and substitution are two common methods used to modify the physical properties of semiconductors (Table 2). Doping involves introducing impurities into the semiconductor crystal lattice, while substitution involves replacing some of the atoms in the lattice with different atoms. Y. Du et al. reported the synthesis of multiferroic micro-particles Bi1−xLaxFeO3 using a hydrothermal technique [90]. After doping with La, the Bi1−xLaxFeO3 sample exhibited an increase in its dielectric constant, with the highest value 225 (at RT/102 Hz) being observed in the sample with x = 0.2 and a particle size of 10 µm in both low and high frequency ranges at room temperature. Moreover, a comparative study of La3+-doped multiferroic BFO (LBFO) showed that BFO with a high purity could be obtained using the sol–gel (SG) synthesis process at relatively lower temperatures, whereas powder with a minor quantity of the secondary Bi25FeO40 phase is obtained using the solid-state (SS) method. The sol–gel method was used to prepare a single-phase LBFO with a smaller particle size of approximately 0.4 μm. When compared with LBFO prepared using the solid-state reaction method, the SG-prepared LBFO demonstrated a significantly higher dielectric constant value on the order of 50,000 (at RT/102 Hz) [91]. Furthermore, Zhang et al. effectively fabricated high-quality Bi1−xLaxFeO3 thin films on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)/glass substrates through a sol–gel methodology employing a spin-coating technique. Their research findings indicate that the inclusion of La3+ ions resulted in a notable decrease in the concentration of Fe2+ ions and O2 vacancies within the material. This led to a significantly large remnant polarization value (Pr = 140.2 μC·cm−2) and a high dielectric constant (εr = 161.77 at RT/102 Hz) for the thin film Bi0.98La0.02FeO3 with an average grain size of 90 nm [92]. Sheoran et al. reported the synthesis of Yttrium (Y3+)-substituted BFO (Bi1−xYxFeO3) nanostructures through the sol–gel pursued auto-combustion route. The study results indicated that the sample with x = 0.2 exhibited a maximal dielectric value of 500 at RT/102 Hz, and a Pr value of 16 μC·cm−2, which can be attributed to its high density of space-charge polarization as a result of its small grain size of 41 nm [93]. In their study, Dhir et al. described the synthesis of Gd-doped BFO nanoparticles using the sol–gel method. The incorporation of Gd3+ ions was found to have a positive impact on both the magnetic and electric properties of the material. Notably, the reduction in particle size (16 nm) for x = 0.15 led to further improvement in the dielectric constant (2193 at RT/102 Hz) and remanent polarization (7 μC·cm−2) values [94]. In addition, the influence of Yb doping on the electrical characteristics of BFO fabricated using the hydrothermal method was examined. BFO doped with 3% Yb displayed the greatest remanent polarization (Pr) value of 0.37 μC·cm−2. However, the dielectric measurements revealed that the introduction of Yb into the perovskite structure of BFO (18–29 nm) improved the formation of M-O-M bonds, resulting in the highest dielectric constant value of 150 (at RT/102 Hz) in BYbFO with x = 0.1 [95]. Using the same synthesis technique, the dielectric properties of barium-doped BFO nanoparticles (Bi1−xBaxFeO3) have been investigated. The obtained dielectric constant value for Bi1−xBaxFeO3 nanoparticles (x = 0.015) of 125 (at RT/102 Hz) was found to be higher than that of pure BFO. This observation can be attributed to the smaller grain size (57.1 nm) and the increased density of defects, such as O2 vacancies, resulting in a substantial space-charge polarization [96]. Furthermore, Mazumder et al. reported the effect of Pb-doping on the dielectric properties of BFO prepared through a straightforward simultaneous precipitation technique which was subsequently followed using a traditional sintering process. The measured dielectric constant and remanent polarization values for Bi1−xPbxFeO3 (x = 0.03) are 2500 (at RT/102 Hz) and 0.75 μC·cm−2, respectively [97]. To study the influence of rare earth element (La3+, Eu3+, Er3+) doping on BFO electrical properties, the microwave-assisted modification of solution combustion synthesis was used to fabricate nanocrystalline (18–28 nm) BFO rare earth-doped powders. It was discovered that the crystal cells of the obtained materials were significantly distorted through rare earth doping, which led to the formation of mixed rhombohedral/orthorhombic crystal structures with decreased lengths of Bi-O and Fe-O bonds and a decreasing radius size of doping ions. As a result, the dielectric constant of the materials was enhanced. The highest dielectric constant value of 150 (at RT/102 Hz) was found in Bi0.9Eu0.1FeO3 [98]. Likewise, Rani et al. investigated the effect of doping Er3+ into BFO on its dielectric properties. The Er-doped BFO samples exhibited a marked improvement in their dielectric constant values (500 at RT/102 Hz for x = 0.15) that can be linked to a decrease in both O2 vacancies and leakage current [99]. Conversely, different studies have been conducted on the effect of doping and substitution of the BFO B-site on its dielectric properties. The Ti-doping effect on the dielectric properties of BFO nanoparticles synthesized using the solvothermal method has been reported. A doping rate of 5% Ti had a considerable effect on increasing the dielectric constant, reaching 1000 at RT/102 Hz with a particle size of 695 nm [100]. In addition, Kathirvel et al. reported Zr-doped BFO nanostructures fabricated through the hydrothermal method. At a dopant concentration of 2.5% Zr with a particle size of 46 nm, the dielectric constant was found to be 366 at RT/103 Hz. The observed increase in the dielectric constant can be attributed to the reduction of Fe3+ ions and an increase in O2 vacancies [101]. Tuning the dielectric properties has been reported through doping BFO with Ni. The matrix Ni-doped BFO (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.07) was prepared using a cost-effective conventional sol–gel technique. Except for the 3% doped sample, the Ni-doped BFO material demonstrated enhanced dielectric properties, as evidenced through an increase in the dielectric constant reaching 2000 (at RT/102 Hz) for 1% Ni dopant [102]. In a comparative study, Saxena et al. reported the dielectric properties of rare-earth ion substitution at dual sites within the BFO crystal. The high dielectric constant was found for the Bi0.9La0.1Fe0.95Ni0.05O3 (BLFNO) composition with a corresponding value of 2083. However, the remanent polarization decreased dramatically as the doping rate increased, going from 17.04 µC·cm−2 for BFO to 0.64 µC·cm−2 for BLFNO [103]. Another study was performed on the impact of the co-doping of BFO with Ba and Nb on the physical properties. It was found that the dielectric constant at higher frequencies increases (with the value of 115 RT/102 Hz for 10BaNb) with the doping level, while the dielectric loss decreases. This can be attributed to a reduction in defect centers achieved through co-doping, which has a considerable effect on the particle size (27 nm for 10BaNb). Increasing the doping level improves the saturation level of the ferroelectric loop and increases the remnant polarization, which rises from 1.28 μC·cm−2 in the 5% Ba-doped sample to 3.24 μC·cm−2 in the 10% Ba–Nb co-doped sample [104]. Xu et al. studied the electrical properties of Li/Nb co-doping BFO (BiFe1−x(Li0.5Nb0.5)xO3) fabricated using traditional ceramic sintering techniques. A high dielectric constant value of 1050 was obtained for the sample with x = 0.01. Likewise, the addition of a small amount of Li/Nb co-doping to BFO ceramics led to enhanced electrical properties, as evidenced through the improvements in the remnant polarization and the ferroelectric P-E loop shape. The observed improvements are thought to be related to a decrease in the concentration of O2 vacancies and a decrease in the formation of Fe2+ ions compared with the results obtained with pure BFO [105].
Designing efficient photocatalytic materials based on BFO for photocatalysis application is challenging. Although BFO-based photocatalysts have demonstrated significant promise in the degradation of organic contaminants, their practical application is limited by unresolved issues such as large band gaps, high recombination rates of photogenerated electrons and holes, and a low separation rate of the photogenerated carriers. Therefore, to maximize solar energy harvesting and boost the adsorption of photodegraded organic compounds, it is imperative to develop photocatalysts with a high selective adsorption capacity and a suitable semiconducting band gap that can be achieved through doping. This approach brings about the basic properties of the tunable surface that depend on the nature and composition of the dopants. It is crucial to comprehend how doping affects photocatalyst qualities in order to select the appropriate element doping. In order to achieve more visible light harvesting, the introduced dopants are intended to (i) improve the surface and interface properties; (ii) modify the large band gap and electronic structure; and (iii) improve each step in the charging kinetics to reduce the recombination of photogenerated carriers. Figure 3 uses a scheme to sum up the effects of doping and co-doping on the band gap energy and removal efficiency of BFO material under visible light.

2.3. Effect of BFO-Based Heterostructures

Recent years have witnessed extensive research on heterostructure-based oxide perovskites owing to their exceptional properties and potential applications. The combination of oxide perovskites can significantly affect their physical properties. These heterostructures could exhibit unique electronic, magnetic, and optical behaviors that are not often found in their constituent counterparts. The interfaces generated by the association of perovskites usually induce strain, charge transfer, and defect generation, thereby prompting modifications in the electronic structure and transport properties. Hence, all these properties can be engineered by controlling the composition, thickness, and orientation of the constituent layers. It has been shown that the BFO heterostructures made with the combination of SrTiO3, La0.7Sr0.3MnO3, and BaTiO3 exhibit improved electric and dielectric properties.
Sen et al. investigated the multifaceted properties of (BiFeO3)0.6(CaTiO3)0.4 prepared following a solid solution approach. The structural deformation from the pure BFO’s rhombohedral structure to an orthorhombic phase was indicated through Rietveld refinement. At RT/102 Hz, the dielectric constant was improved with a high value of 1050 [108].
In another work, a solid solution of 0.8Bi1−xNdxFeO3-0.2PbTiO3 (BNFPT)x was prepared using the conventional solid-state reaction process, and the effect of Nd3+ substitution on the electric and dielectric properties was examined. The coexistence of tetragonal and rhombohedral structures was established by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic analyses of the samples. The introduction of Nd3+ into the 0.8BiFeO3-0.2PbTiO3 compound was found to enhance the dielectric constant (1625 at RT/102 Hz for x = 0.05) and reduce the dielectric loss [109].
Ren et al. studied the Mn-doped 0.5BiFeO3-0.5SrTiO3 ceramics in three different ways: as an additive, by substituting Fe sites, and by substituting Ti sites. The findings demonstrated that the dielectric and ferroelectric properties of the ceramics are significantly influenced by how Mn is inserted. The authors reported that using Mn either as an additive or a substituent of the Fe site can lead to a reduction in the dielectric loss and an enhancement in the dielectric breakdown field. However, the Mn substitution of the Ti site can negatively impact the dielectric behavior but encourage grain growth. The reduction of Fe and O2 vacancies can be effectively addressed by both adding Mn and substituting the Fe site. Moreover, substituting the Ti site with Mn can lead to the creation of more O2 vacancies. At room temperature, it was found that samples with 1% (mole) Mn-doped BFO-STO exhibit a remnant polarization of 6 μC·cm−2 and a dielectric constant of 720 at 102 Hz [110]. A high dielectric constant value (4300 at RT/102 Hz) was obtained for BiFeO3-BaTiO3 solid solution ceramics fabricated using microwave sintering (MWS) and traditional sintering (CS) techniques for a solid-state reaction [111].
Furthermore, the effect of the thermal quenching and sintering temperature on the physical properties of sol–gel-synthesized BiFeO3-xPbTiO3 nano-ceramics was investigated showing a very large remnant polarization of 95 μC·cm−2 and a dielectric constant value of 587 at (RT/102 Hz) for BF-34PT [112]. Recently, more complex systems of three perovskite oxides, one of which is BFO, have been developed. The solid-state reaction method was used to fabricate the ternary compound BiFeO3-BiCoO3-BaTiO3 (BFO-BCO-BT) and tuning the dielectric constant and ferroelectricity was investigated. The buildup of interfacial charges and the stabilization of the BFO-BT solid solution through the addition of BCO showed a large dielectric constant value of 2000 at RT/102 Hz with a small particle size of 60 nm [113]. Zhang et al. studied the effect of Ta2O5-modified BiFeO3–BaTiO3–LaFeO3 solid solutions prepared using the solid-state reaction on the dielectric and multiferroic properties. The incorporation of Ta2O5 into ceramic samples resulted in enhanced dielectric properties, as evidenced by an increase in the dielectric constant from 829 for undoped ceramics to 1149 for x = 1.25 measured at RT/102 Hz [114]. Table 3 summarizes the dielectric constant and polarization values of BFO-based heterostructures concerning grain/particle size.

3. BFO-Based Materials Photocatalytic Applications

3.1. Degradation of Organic Pollutants

Recently, TiO2 and ZnO have been extensively exploited for their various photocatalytic applications. However, their ability to absorb in the UV region (which comprises only 10% of the total sun radiation) and the challenge of their removal after treatment have hindered their usage as photocatalysts [119]. Therefore, developing a suitable catalyst working in the visible region is a currently pressing need. BFO, a room-temperature multiferroic material, constitutes an attractive candidate owing to its activity in the visible region and its magnetic behavior favoring an easy removal of the photocatalyst after treatment. In addition, its photocatalytic activity under visible light becomes prominent due to its narrow band gap of 2.1–2.7 eV, which is particularly important because visible light energy occupies about 48% of the total solar energy [120].
Recently, numerous works have been reported on BFO for the photocatalytic degradation of dyes such as methyl orange, methylene blue, and rhodamine B [121]. Mohan et al. were the first to report the activity of nanostructured BFO particles on the degradation of methylene blue (MB) under sunlight, demonstrating a 58% degradation efficiency after 240 min [122]. Doping is among the most important ways to efficiently enhance the photodegradation performance of BFO (Table 4) considering the wide scope of designs to alter both A- and B-sites. Previous studies have shown that doping offers extra photocatalytic advantages to reduce the bandgap and other photophysical properties of this functional oxide [123].
A large majority of earth metals, such as Gd, La, Nd, Dy, Er, and Sm, have been introduced as dopants into BFO nanostructures to investigate their photocatalytic properties [124,125,126,127,128]. This route has proved to be relatively more successful due to the 4f electron configurations of rare earth metals that facilitate the abruption of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. The band gap of some bismuth photocatalysts has been shown to decrease with rare earth element doping, which might increase the photocatalytic activities. It should be noted that substituting Bi3+ cations with rare earth ions that have smaller ionic radii than Bi3+ (1.03 Å), such as Dy3+ (0.912 Å), Gd3+ (0.938 Å), or Sm3+ (0.958 Å), is requisite in order to cause significant structural distortions in the BFO lattice for improved photocatalytic properties. The photocatalytic activities of Gd-doped (10%) BFO were found to considerably enhance its photocatalytic performance under simulated solar irradiation. Findings show that 10% Gd BFO photocatalyst degradation rates reach 80% and 79% for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively [121]. Similar results reported the degradation activity of Gd-doped BFO photocatalysts for decomposing methylene blue and rhodamine B under visible light irradiation. It was found that Gd-doped (10%) BFO photocatalysts exhibit much higher photocatalytic activity than pure BFO. Gd-doped BFO decomposes 94% of methylene blue after 240 min and 94% of rhodamine B after 120 min [124]. The distinctive photocatalytic efficiency of Gd-doped (10%) BFO can be largely attributed to its excellent morphology and good crystallinity that facilitate improved light absorption and the effective separation of photogenerated charge carriers. These results illustrate the excellent photocatalytic activity of Gd-doped (10%) BFO, which can be employed in various applications related to environmental remediation. Considerably enhanced photocatalytic activity was also obtained by adding La doping to BFO nanoparticles [125]. In this case, approximately 87% higher degradation of the methylene blue was observed after 70 min under visible-light illumination. La-doped BFO presents better photocatalytic activity compared to undoped BFO nanoparticles, which could be ascribed to the increase in the recombination rate of holes and electrons in doped samples or to band gap variations. In a recent study, Dy-doped BFO was found to induce a high photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (92%) achieved after 240 min under visible-light irradiation [126], which could be attributed to the reduced band gap energy and ferroelectric properties. Increasing Dy concentrations up to 15% mediated a charge transfer process through band bending in this composition that was associated with enhanced electrical domains. Likewise, Er-doped BFO was used as a photocatalyst for the photocatalytic removal of tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) under visible light [127]. The photocatalytic activities of Er-doped BFO for TC removal were much higher than those for BFO, where Er-3%-doped BFO samples achieved the highest photocatalytic TC-degradation efficiency of 75.8% after 180 min (~2.8 times higher than that of the BFO samples). The Er-3%-doped BFO photoelectrode manifested higher photocurrent intensity compared with BFO photoelectrodes, implying a much more efficient charge separation and a transfer with a longer charge lifespan of the photoinduced carriers, thus improving the photocatalytic performance. Notably, Er is a popular rare earth element for doping semiconductor photocatalysts owing to its unique transitions of Er intra-f electrons that to the sensitization of the photocatalyst to visible light. Chen et al. reported an enhancement in photocatalytic activity of Nd-doped BFO with the increase in Nd-doping concentrations when x = 0.2 (59% after 120 min) [128]. However, the photocatalytic activity was found to decrease with the further increase of the Nd-dopant concentration. The maximum photocatalytic activity of x = 0.2 was ascribed to the anomalously high dielectric constant at the morphotropic phase boundary, enlarging the width of the space-charge region. This phenomenon results from the increase in the defect sites in the lattice, which enhances the charge separation and reduces electron/hole–pair recombination rates. Nonetheless, higher doping concentrations produce more defect sites that convert to recombination centers. Another study shows that the photocatalytic activity of Sm-doped BFO was significantly affected by the Sm-doping content [129]. Compared to pure BFO, the Sm-doped BFO samples exhibited much higher photocatalytic activity, which was attributed to the enhanced visible-light absorption and the efficient separation of photogenerated electrons and holes derived from Sm-dopant trapping level. Moreover, the visible-light photodegradation of organic dyes using BFO doped with Ba, Mn, Co and Pb metal ions was studied. Soltani and Lee reported a complete photocatalytic degradation of toluene and benzene with 91% and 81% reductions after 50 min under visible-light irradiation for Ba-doped BFO [130]. The BFO nanoparticles doped with Ba exhibited a low band gap energy, high specific surface area, and high ferromagnetic properties, all contributing to the improvement of the photocatalytic performance. The findings showed that Ba-doped BFO exhibits a decreasing band gap energy with reduced O2 vacancies, which is related to the lattice distortion of the Ba-doped BFO nanoparticles. In fact, the growth of the particles is restricted, leading to an increasing specific surface area and a significant improvement of the photocatalytic activity.
Photocatalysis has been reported for the degradation of AR-85 under visible-light irradiation using Mn-doped (10%) BFO photocatalysts [119]. The photocatalytic activity was demonstrated at 100% degradation of the dye in only 50 min after light exposure, whereas the degradation time required for the undoped bismuth ferrite was much longer. Mn-doped (10%) BFO led to a decrease in particle size, while the band gap gradually decreased from 2.2 eV to 1.97 eV with an increasing Mn content. The greater photocatalytic activity in Mn-doped BFO compared with pristine BFO is associated with the efficient separation and migration of photogenerated charge carriers and the decreased recombination probability of electron/hole pairs derived from the Mn ion doping. In another study, the effect of co-doping on the B-site of BFO was investigated [131]. A remarkable photocatalytic performance was observed for co-doped BFO with a degradation rate of 93.79% after 2 h under light exposure. The results indicate that co-doping promoted the effective charge separation of the catalyst to enhance photocatalytic behavior, which was attributed to the reduction in the crystal size and the creation of O2 vacancies in the system due to co-doping. Hence, co-doping improves the position of BFO as a promising candidate for environmental remediation applications. Jaffari et al. reported the effect of a Pd-doped BFO catalyst for the degradation of malachite green dye and phenol from waste water [132]. Particularly, the 2 wt% Pd-BFO exhibited the best photoactivity (95.7% degradation) compared with pure BFO (72.3% degradation). The enhanced photoactivity could be credited to the appropriate Pd contents that enhanced the e-trapping capacity, which was helpful in the generation and transmission of e/h+ pairs. The charge carrier generation and separation/transfer are key factors in the photocatalytic process. Furthermore, the separation/transfer of e/h+ pairs using Pd-doped BFO photocatalysts were investigated under the on/off circulation of 105 W of visible light using transient photocurrent measurements. Pd-BFO possessed the highest current intensity of 2.59 μA, which was 1.6 times higher than that of pure BFO. These results explicitly revealed that the loaded metallic Pd on the BFO surface would highly expedite the generation and separation/transfer of charge carriers, which validated the improved photocatalytic ability of Pd-doped BFO to degrade organic pollutants.
Meanwhile, the co-substitution of the BFO structure in both the A- and B-sites with (La, Se), (Ce, Ni), (Nd, Ni), and (Ba, Ca) have been used to improve the photocatalytic activity and visible light response of the material compared with the bulk BFO material. The substitution of elements at the A-site can help suppress bismuth volatilization, while the substitution of transition metals at the B-site can reduce the Fe valence fluctuations. These changes in the elemental composition and oxidation state can result in improved photocatalytic activity, greater stability, and longer lifespan for BFO photocatalysts. These doping strategies have been widely investigated, offering great potential for developing even more efficient BFO photocatalysts. In this context, the co-substitution of La in place of Bi as well as Se in place of Fe was studied to control the recombination and enhance the number of delocalized electrons [133]. The photodegradation activity of La- and Se-co-doped BFO was investigated under visible-light irradiation using Congo red as a model dye in an aqueous solution. The developed material exhibited excellent photocatalytic activities for model dye, catalyzing more than 90% of the dye in the first 30 min of exposure to visible light. Higher dye degradation activities for La- and Se-co-doped BFO can be attributed to the complete phase transition from rhombohedral to orthorhombic, which provides a favorable band gap (1.77 eV) and binding energies for the enhanced catalysis of dye species. The lower band gap provided easy electron availability upon exposure to incident radiation, while the sheet-type morphology ensured larger contact between the surface of the catalyst and the adsorbing species, resulting in an enhanced synergistic response and higher catalytic activities.
Table 4. Pure BFO- and doped BFO-based photocatalyst for dye degradation.
Table 4. Pure BFO- and doped BFO-based photocatalyst for dye degradation.
PhotocatalystDoping ElementsBand Gap (ev)PolluantDegradation TimeRemoval EfficiencyRefs.
BiFeO3 2.2 eVMethylene Blue240 min58%[122]
10% Gd-BiFeO3Gd1.95–1.18 eVCiprofloxacin240 min80%[121]
10% Gd-BiFeO3Gd1.95–1.18 eVLevofloxacin240 min79%[121]
10% Gd-BiFeO3Gd2.38–2.29 eVMethylene Blue180 min97%[122]
10% Gd-BiFeO3Gd2.03–2.2 eVRhodamine B240 min96%[124]
Bi0.90La0.05Ba0.05FeO3La2.02–2.11 eVMethylene Blue70 min87%[125]
Bi0.8Nd0.2FeO3Nd1.99 eVRhodamine B120 min59%[128]
Bi0.85Dy0.15FeO3Dy2.35–2.26 eVMethylene Blue240 min92%[126]
Er3%-BFOEr2.12 eVTetracycline hydrochloride180 min75,8[127]
Bi0.97Sm0.03FeO3Sm2.14 eVMethyl orange120 min86.9%[129]
Bi0.93Ba0.07FeO3Ba2.11–1.86 eVToluene50 min91%[130]
Bi0.93Ba0.07FeO3Ba2.11–1.86 eVBenzene50 min81%[130]
10% Mn-doped BFOMn2.2–1.97 eVAcid red 8560 min100%[119]
BiFe0.925Co0.075O3Co Acid Red 85240 min93.79%[131]
0.2 wt% Pd-BFOPb2.10 eVMalachite green 95.7%[132]
Bi0.92La0.08Fe0.95Se0.5O3(La, Se)1.77 eVCongo Red30 min90%[133]
Bi0.92Ce0.08Fe0.92Ni0.08O3(Ce, Ni)1.9 eVMethylene Blue90 min93.29%[134]
Bi0.92Ce0.08Fe0.92Ni0.08O3(Ce, Ni)1.9 eVRhodamine B90 min96.05%[134]
Bi0.9Ba0.05Fe0.95Ca0.05O3(Ba, Ca)2.1 eVMethylene Blue90 min93%[125]
Bi0.95Nd0.05Fe0.97Ni0.03O3(Nd, Ni)2.1 eVMethylene Blue90 min93%[135]
BiFeO3/BiVO4-2.7 eVTetracycline90 min95%[136]
BiFeO3/MoS2-1.8 eVRhodamine B200 min89%[137]
Ag/BiFeO3-2.2 eVMethyl orange120 min96%[138]
BiFeO3/rGO-1.9 eVMethylene Blue300 min98%[139]
Cu2O/BiFeO3-2/2.1 eVTetracycline120 min98%[140]
BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9-2.2/1.9 eVO-chlorophenol240 min95%[141]
SnO2/BiFeO3-3.5/2.07 eVRhodamine B120 min87.2%[142]
BiFeO3/GdFeO3-2/2.3 eVMethylene Blue540 min98%[143]
CuO/BiFeO3-1.7/2.18 eVRhodamine B270 min50%[144]
BiFeO3/ZnFe2O4-2.17/2.03 eVMethylene Blue120 min97%[145]
BiFeO3/TiO2-2.2/3.2 eVMethylene Blue180 min94.4%[146]
BiFeO3/Fe2O3-2.25/1.9 eVMethylene Blue60 min94%[147]
BiFeO3/CuWO4-2.1/2.3 eVMethyl orange120 min85%[148]
Ag2O/BiFeO3-1.3/2.1 eVRhodamine B60 min97%[149]
BiFeO3/g-C3N4-2.13/2.78 eVRhodamine B60 min100%[150]
It was reported that the co-substitution of Ce and Ni enormously impacts the photocatalytic efficiency of undoped BFO [134], which is maximized with the increase of co-doping levels. The best photocatalytic methylene blue and rhodamine B degradation efficiency were estimated at 93.29% and 96.05% after 90 min for Ce- and Ni-co-substitution BFO. The results suggest that the photocatalyst activity depends on the quantity of photon energy absorbed by the catalyst and the extent of the pollutant’s adsorption on the photocatalyst’s surface. The bandgap of Ce- and Ni-co-doped BFO is smaller than pristine bismuth ferrite, which helps absorb more energy than pure BFO. Meanwhile, the adsorption of pollutants on the photocatalyst surface is high for Ce–Ni-co-substitution BFO due to its larger porosity and raised surface area, which reveals a remarkable photocatalytic activity. The bandgap of undoped bismuth ferrite would be effectively reduced from 2.10 eV to 1.85 eV, which provides large photocatalytic efficiency under irradiation using various wavelengths of light. Depending on these experimental findings, the enhanced photocatalytic efficiency of Ce–Ni-co-substitution BFO would be ascribed to the raised optical absorption, the successful separation, and then the migration of photo-produced charge carriers with the reduced recombination feasibility of electron–hole pair findings from the co-substitution influence [134].
Photocatalytic activities of (Nd, Ni)-co-doped BFO nanoparticles are determined through the degradation of methylene blue dye under visible light and H2O2 [135]. After 90 min reaction time, the degradation of MB is improved for (Nd, Ni)-co-doped BFO (93% degradation). A similar result was found for (Ba and Ca)-co-doped BFO [125]. Its photodegradation efficiency was found to be 93% after 90 min performed in the conditions of pH value 2 and with the addition of 0.5 mL H2O2. Basically, the efficiency of the photocatalysts depends on the nature of doping, which affects factors like the crystallite size, morphology, surface area, band gap (Figure 4a), and photo-induced electron–hole separation efficiency of the catalyst. Figure 4b summarizes the degradation time and efficiency of the BFO-doped elements reported in this review.
The crucial process of removing harmful pollutants from the environment is facilitated by the photodegradation of organic dyes. A vital role in this process is played by BFO-based heterostructures due to their unique properties, such as high photocatalytic activity and excellent stability. Visible light is effectively absorbed through these heterostructures and the electrons generated during the process react with the dye molecules, leading to their degradation. Furthermore, the synthesis of BFO-based heterostructures can be easily accomplished using simple methods, making them a cost-effective and sustainable solution for environmental remediation. The photodegradation of organic dyes using BFO-based heterojunctions has been studied extensively in recent years; various organic dyes have been subjected to this process, including methylene blue or orange, rhodamine B, and Congo red. Several factors should be considered when selecting an organic dye for photodegradation with a BFO heterostructure. These include the properties of the dye itself, such as its absorption spectrum and chemical stability, as well as the specific conditions of the photodegradation process, such as the light source and the presence of any co-catalysts. Ultimately, the choice of dye will depend on balancing these factors to achieve optimal performance and efficiency in the photodegradation process.
Nanocomposites of BiFeO3-GdFeO3 (BFO-GFO) heterostructures were synthesized for the first time utilizing the sol–gel technique and investigated for dye degradation [143]. According to Tauc plots, the band gap energies of BiFeO3-GdFeO3 were found to be 1.8 eV, while 2.0 eV and 2.3 eV were determined for BFO and GdFeO3, respectively [143]. The findings showed that when methylene blue was exposed to pure GdFeO3 for 9 h, its degradation was limited, indicating that GdFeO3 has a restricted photocatalytic activity under visible light. On the one hand, the decreased photodegradation efficiency of GdFeO3 was linked to its high band gap potential, inadequate absorption in the UV light range, and less-than-optimal photoelectric conversion. On the other hand, BFO was able to break down as much as 76% of the methylene blue after 9 h of irradiation. Remarkably, a high photodegradation efficiency of 98% for methylene blue was achieved for the BiFeO3-GdFeO3 composite after 9 h of irradiation. The improved photocatalytic performance of the BiFeO3-GdFeO3 composite could potentially be attributed to the formation of a heterojunction, hypothesized to induce the generation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, resulting in an elevation in photocatalytic activity. Furthermore, the lowering of band gap values has been instrumental in enhancing its photodegradation efficiency by allowing improved visible-light absorption [143]. Xu et al. reported the rational design of Ag/BiFeO3 fibrous heterostructures using an electrospinning process, as illustrated in Figure 5a, with the aim of coupling piezoelectric and plasmonic effects (Figure 5b) to modulate the separation and migration of photogenerated charge carriers. It was demonstrated through PFM testing that the piezoelectric feature of 29.3 pm at −7.53 V was exhibited using the Ag2/BFO hybrid. Furthermore, when the ultrasound was introduced, the photocatalytic degradation rate of MO and MB over Ag2/BFO reached 96% and 95% within 100 min, respectively. The significant improvement in the photocatalytic activity was attributed to the synergistic effect of the piezoelectricity and LSPR, wherein the piezoelectric field within the BFO was found to further promote the directional migration and separation of photogenerated charge carriers induced through the LSPR effect of Ag NPs on the surface [138]. Through a combination of hydrothermal and post-impregnation techniques, the CuO/BFO composite with a p–n heterojunction structure was fabricated. In the context of the photocatalytic evaluation of methylorange degradation under visible light, it was observed that an optimal photocatalytic degradation efficiency of up to 50% was attained when the loading content of CuO was set at 15%, surpassing that of pure BFO and CuO by more than threefold. Furthermore, following five cycles of photodegradation of methyl orange, no significant loss of photocatalytic activity in CuO/BFO was observed, confirming its stability and long-term reusability [144]. In another piece of research, a BFO/MoS2 nanocomposite was successfully synthesized using a combination of the sol–gel procedure for BFO and the hydrothermal method for MoS2 [137]. The as-prepared BFO/MoS2 nanocomposite demonstrated a remarkable performance in the visible-light photo-decolorization of RhB. The photocatalytic experiments indicated that an impressive removal rate of approximately 89% of rhodamine B is achieved through the nanocomposite (50% BFO/50% MoS2 Wt) within 200 min. under visible-light irradiation. This exceptional photocatalytic activity can be ascribed to the highly efficient separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Furthermore, the high activity is maintained by the BFO/MoS2 nanocomposite, even after undergoing three photoreaction cycles, and can be easily separated and collected using an external magnetic field [137]. In another study, a facile ultrasonic/hydrothermal route was employed to synthesize the BFO/BVO p–n junction, resulting in a significant improvement in the performance of n-type BVO and p-type BFO for the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline (TC) and the photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting process [136]. Notably, the photodegradation of TC using BVO and BFO was found highly dependent on the pH level, while that using BFO/BVO exhibited pH-independent behavior. The introduction of BFO/BVO p–n junction nanostructures led to a significant improvement in TC photocatalytic degradation, achieving removal rates of 84% and 95% at pH 6.7 and 9.5, respectively, as compared with 31% and 22% with BFO alone. Moreover, an increase from 37% with BVO to 84% with the BFO/BVO p–n junction at pH  =  2.5 was demonstrated [136].
To enhance visible-light adsorption and photocatalytic activity, a modified BFO/rGO nanocomposite was fabricated via sol–gel process by controlling heat treatment parameters and rGO% [139]. When compared with BFO, BGO exhibits a narrower band gap energy of 1.8 eV, a lower rate of charge carrier recombination, and stronger magnetic characteristics. The highest photocatalytic activity at the optimum concentration was demonstrated by BGO with 1 wt% rGO in the range of photocatalysts prepared (1, 5, 10, and 20 wt% rGO), leading to MB degradation under visible light of up to 98% after 5 h [139]. Wang et al. reported a sonocatalytic removal of tetracycline using an S-scheme Cu2O/BFO heterojunction. BFO was synthesized through a simple solvothermal method, while Cu2O/BFO was fabricated through a co-precipitation method. The formation of heterojunctions between BFO and Cu2O was proved using photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, showing a low intensity in the case of BFO/Cu2O compared with pure BFO, which effectively inhibits the carrier recombination and improves the charge transfer efficiency. Superior sonocatalytic oxidation of TET is exhibited through CBF-3, with a degradation efficiency of TET reaching 98.0% under optimal conditions, such as a 1 g·L−1 of CBF-3 composite, a 20 mg·L−1 TET solution, a US irradiation power of 500 W, and a US irradiation time of 5 h [140].
To demonstrate the synergetic effect of the BFO ferroelectric property on the photocatalytic performance, a BiFeO3/TiO2 p-n heterojunction photocatalyst was developed through hydrolysis and precipitation. This approach resulted in the formation of TiO2 nanospheres on BFO nanocubes (Figure 5c) that contribute to enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency. Improved separation and transfer efficiency of photoelectron–hole pairs, higher sensitivity to visible light, and enlarged specific surface area are observed in the BiFeO3/TiO2 p-n heterojunction, as compared with neat TiO2 and BFO. Additionally, superior photocatalytic degradation performance for methylene blue (MB) and common antibiotic tetracycline (TC) under UV- and visible-light irradiation is exhibited through the composite. MB degradation rates of 78.4% and 90.4% under UV- and visible-light irradiation, respectively, are achieved within 3 h [146]. In another study, an effective approach to enhancing the charge separation for high-efficiency photocatalytic o-chlorophenol degradation is achieved through the fabrication of BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 hollow nanosphere (Figure 5e) phase-mixed heterojunctions using a template-adsorption-calcination method. An S-scheme mechanism with an interesting Fe 3d-channel for efficient charge separation was confirmed to be followed by the BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction (Figure 5e). The resultant composite nanospheres were prepared through calcination in the air using a muffle furnace at temperatures ranging from 500 °C to 800 °C for a duration of 2 h. The as-prepared samples were designated as BFO-500, BFO-600, BFO-700, and BFO-800. Under visible-light irradiation, the optimized sample (designated BFO-700) showed 7.7- and 10.7-fold higher photoactivity than pure BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 nanoparticles, respectively. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of BFO-700 can be attributed to several factors, including increased light absorption due to the hollow structure, enhanced charge separation facilitated by the S-scheme mechanism using Fe–O channels, and preferential dechlorination through selective adsorption [141].

3.2. Solar Water Splitting

The photocatalytic water splitting process is the conversion of solar energy into chemical energy used to drive the production of H2 and O2. This process is achieved when the photocatalyst absorbs natural solar light (i.e., sunlight) while dispersed in water and then electron–hole pairs migrate to the surface of the photocatalyst to generate and produce H2 and O2 [151]. The photocatalytic dissociation of water has many advantages, such as being suited to splitting water of a nearly neutral pH in a one-step process without the need for an applied external bias. However, unassisted overall water splitting under a single-absorber photocatalytic process must achieve the following two conditions: (1) the valence and conduction gap edges of this photocatalyst must astride across the water oxidation (redox) and proton reduction and potentials; (2) this photocatalyst must possess an adequate narrow bandgap to absorb a majority of the solar spectrum [59]. Considering the potential of water splitting, the lowest energy of the absorbed photon must be larger than 1.23 eV to trigger this reaction. In view of the energy requirements set by H2O reduction and oxidation potentials of the conduction band and valence band levels, the optimal band gap of the semiconductor for efficient H2 production is about 2.0 eV [120]. Therefore, developing a new photocatalytic material with an adequate band gap that can directly split water into H2 under visible-light irradiation is essential for H2 production. BFO is an interesting multiferroic material for energy-related applications, especially H2 generation, through photocatalytic water splitting due to its small band gap (~2.2 eV) [152], good carrier transport properties, and large absorption of visible light extending up to 750 nm.
Through the systemic investigation of the Sr-doping level of BFO, it is found that the HER enhancement originates from the improvement of ferromagnetism of Sr-doped BFO without the obvious scarification of ferroelectricity at room temperature [152]. The H2 evolution of Sm-5%-doped BFO has also been elucidated recently [153]. The rate of H2 production has been found to be 6.54 μmol·h−1·cm−2. The improved photocatalytic activity of Sm-5%-doped BFO has been explained based on the effect of doping, better solar spectral response, hindering the recombination loss of photo-generated charge carriers, and fast and facile charge transport.
To enhance the photocatalytic dissociation of water splitting, a new perovskite material has been reported by doping Gd in place of Bi and Co in place of Fe for H2 production through the photoelectrochemical splitting of water [154]. The doping levels lead to the band gap engineering from 2.23 eV to 1.77 eV, as shown in Figure 6. This band gap lowering improves the photocatalytic response of the resulting materials. The highest H2 production rate of 74.57 mmol·h−1·cm−2 has been found for Gd- and Co-co-doped BFO possessing the lowest band gap of 1.77 eV, with a maximum photo-conversion efficiency of 2.29%. Thus, the higher rate of H2 production and better photo-conversion efficiency of Co-co-doped BFO is due to its better solar spectral response.
The construction of heterojunctions is deemed a prospective methodology for the development of innovative photocatalysts for solar water splitting with outstanding performance. It involves combining different semiconductor materials with unequal band structures and suitable band alignment to form a junction interface that can promote the separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs, leading to enhanced photocatalytic activity. WO3/BiFeO3 n-p heterojunction films were prepared using the sol–gel spin coating method [155]. Using 2-methoxyethanol as a solvent and DEA as an additive, the best BFO phase has been obtained with regard to impurity phases, micro-structural morphology, and photocurrents. The photocurrent exhibited through the WO3/BFO n-p heterojunction (35.2 mA⋅cm−2) shows a significant improvement over the photocurrents of neat WO3 (6.5 mA⋅cm−2) and BFO (17.5 mA⋅cm−2) thin films (Figure 7a) [155]. In another study, a facile ultrasonic/hydrothermal route was employed to synthesize the BFO/BVO p–n junction, resulting in a significant improvement in the performance of n-type BVO and p-type BFO for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting process [136]. The BFO/BVO nanostructures exhibited a favorable photocurrent density of 0.36 mA⋅cm−2 under UV–vis light and 0.23 mA⋅cm−2 under visible light at 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl [136]. In addition, a simple sol–gel process was used to synthesize a single-phase BFO film on a TiO2 photoanode to enhance photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting efficiency. The controllable thickness of the BFO films facilitated the induction of a significant ferroelectric polarization under bias voltage, thereby effectively adjusting the electric band bending at the BFO/TiO2 interface. As a result of this approach, the photocurrent density achieved using the BFO-5/TiO2 photoanode reached an impressive value of 11.25 mA⋅cm−2, surpassing that of bare TiO2 by over 20-fold. Furthermore, when the BFO-5/TiO2 photoanode was positively poled, it demonstrated a remarkable photocurrent density of 28.75 mA⋅cm−2 at 1.5 V vs. SCE under AM 1.5G illumination [156].
Zhang et al. fabricated BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction nanofibers through a facile wet chemical process followed by an electro-spinning technique. The inclusion of Bi2Fe4O9 within the BFO matrix resulted in a red-shift of its absorption edge, thereby enabling the enhanced absorption of visible light and improved efficiency in the separation of photogenerated carriers. Furthermore, the synthesized BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 nanofibers exhibited heightened photocatalytic activity in the generation of H2 from water under visible-light irradiation conditions. Notably, the BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 (BB02) sample demonstrated H2 evolution rates (~800 μmol·g−1) approximately 2.7 times and 2.0 times higher than those observed for pure BiFeO3 and pure Bi2Fe4O9 samples, respectively (Figure 7b). It was observed that the photocurrent density of the BB02 sample reached 1.8 μA⋅cm−2, far exceeding those achieved through pure BiFeO3 (0.6 μA⋅cm−2) and pure Bi2Fe4O9 (0.9 μA⋅cm−2) samples, respectively. Notably, the order of variation in photocurrent density was identified as follows: BB02 > BB03 > BB01 > BB04 > Bi2Fe4O9 > BFO [157]. More recently, high-quality Bi2O3, BFO, Bi2O3/BFO films on indium tin oxide (ITO) were produced using pulse laser deposition (PLD). It was observed that the BFO film exhibited both cathodic and anodic photocurrents in the potential range of −0.7–0.2 V compared with the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Notably, the photocathodic current was significantly higher, indicating pronounced p-type photocathodic behavior suitable for potential photoelectrochemical (PEC) applications. In particular, the BFO film exhibited an onset potential of around −0.10 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode, with a photocurrent density of −40.1 μA⋅cm−2 obtained at −0.68 V versus the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Remarkably, the cathodic photocurrent density showed a significant increase in the Bi2O3/BFO heterojunction film compared with the BFO film, reaching a value as high as −84.07 μA⋅cm−2 at −0.68 V compared with the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. This clear improvement represents a doubling of the corresponding value obtained for the BFO film at the same potential, with an onset potential of 0.14 V relative to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. In addition, the effect of Bi2O3 overlayer thickness was explored, showing that the maximum photocurrent is achieved for 4 nm Bi2O3/BFO. Moreover, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results illustrated interfacial charge transfer processes on the photoelectrodes. The equivalent circuit utilized in the analysis comprises an electrolyte resistor (R1), a ground resistor (R2), a charge transfer resistor (R3), and two constant-phase elements (CPE1 and CPE2). As shown in Figure 7c, the findings indicate a significant reduction in the low-frequency arc when transitioning from Bi2O3 to BFO and Bi2O3/BFO heterojunction films. The charge transfer resistance, denoted as R3, in the Bi2O3/BFO film measures approximately 10 kΩ, a value lower than the approximate 18 kΩ observed in the BFO film. Thus, a more rapid charge separation process can be achieved by adding a Bi2O3 overlayer onto BFO film [158].
Zhu et al. reported a method for the construction of a BiFeO3/Cu2O heterojunction on BFO matrix through the sol–gel route and magnetron sputtering. They showed an enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of BFO due to the effective separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Under an applied voltage of −0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl, the photocurrent density of BFO increased from −15 μA⋅cm−2 to −103 μA⋅cm−2. Furthermore, upon positive poling, the photocurrent density experienced a further escalation to exceed 200 μA⋅cm−2 [162]. To improve the photocatalytic efficiency, Au/BFO heterostructures were synthesized with different shapes through a simple hydrothermal method followed by radiolysis without the use of a surfactant or strong reducing agent. In the investigation of shape-dependent photocatalysis, it was revealed that higher H2 generation (1.4 mmol·h−1·g−1) was achieved using the BFO octahedron (BFO-Oct) in comparison with the H2 generation rates observed for the BFO nanosheets (BFO-Ns) (1.1 mmol·h−1·g−1) and the BFO cylindrical-shaped (BFO-Cyl) nanostructures (0.5 mmol·h−1·g−1) (Figure 7d). Following that, the effect of pH on the photocatalytic H2 evolution was examined to better understand the reaction conditions. An enhanced catalytic activity for H2 evolution was observed at pH 3, with approximately 2.4 mmol of H2 produced. This effect was attributed to the increased availability of H+ ions in the acidic solution. Conversely, as the medium shifted towards alkalinity, a decrease in H2 evolution activity was observed, primarily resulting from the insufficient presence of protons. Subsequently, following the radiolytic construction of the Au/BFO heterostructure, a notable enhancement in H2 generation efficiency was achieved, primarily as a consequence of photoinduced electron transfer due to surface-plasmon effect, which is a collective oscillation of conduction band electrons brought on by the interaction with visible-light photons. This phenomenon creates a local electromagnetic field at the BFO photocatalyst interface and subsequently increases the efficiency of charge-carrier separation [163]. When plasmonic metal nanoparticles are introduced to a certain distance, their localized electromagnetic field may couple and produce a significant number of hot electrons that significantly enhance photocatalytic reactions [164]. Additionally, the photo-response of the Au/BFO heterostructures was evaluated through photoelectrochemical (PEC) measurements in terms of the photocurrent. The results indicated that Au/BFO-Ns yielded higher photocurrents than BFO nanostructures, with an increase that was approximately 3.8-fold. In the absence of light, the current density for BFO-Ns remains negligible at 0.07 μA⋅cm−2. However, under continuous light illumination, the current density increases to 0.56 μA⋅cm−2 for BFO-Ns and 2.14 μA⋅cm−2 for Au/BFO-Ns at a potential of 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl, resulting in a remarkable 3.8-fold enhancement for Au/BFO-Ns heterostructures. In a similar study, Au/BFO-Ns heterostructures showed a considerably higher current density of approximately 235 μA⋅cm−2, indicating the generation of H2 through water reduction. In contrast, bare Au NPs exhibited a relatively lower current density of 75 μA⋅cm−2 at negative potential. Hence, the presence of Au NPs and their strong interaction with BFO-Ns likely contributed to the substantial current density observed in the Au/BFO-Ns heterostructures [159]. In a separate investigation, the photocatalytic performance of CdS for water splitting was improved by coupling with BFO, which led to the creation of a direct Z-scheme heterojunction [160]. The photocarrier transfer pathway entails the migration of CB electrons from CdS, characterized by a lower CB potential, to the VB of BFO, which exhibits a higher VB potential. Subsequently, these transferred electrons engage in recombination with holes, thereby generating charge carriers possessing elevated redox potentials within BFO. The accumulation of photoinduced electrons in the CB of CdS establishes an electron-rich zone, markedly mitigating CdS’s susceptibility to photo-oxidation. Conversely, the gathering of photoinduced holes in the VB of BFO creates a hole-rich region, affording protection to BFO against photo-reduction. Consequently, BFO is expected to demonstrate robust resistance to photo-oxidation, while CdS should exhibit substantial resistance to photo-reduction. Furthermore, as a result of the p-type conductivity of BFO and the n-type conductivity of CdS, an internal field formed in its crystal structure (Figure 7e) that contributed to lowering the hole recombination. Using hydrothermal and precipitation methods, BiFeO3 (BFO) and Cadmium Sulfide (CdS) were synthesized, respectively. A H2 evolution rate of 99.3 μmol·h−1·g−1 was observed with pure CdS. A low activity level was observed with pure BFO. This is due to the fact that BFO’s CB is not sufficiently negative to effectively reduce H+ into H2. When 30% BFO was added to CdS (CB-70), an increase in the H2 evolution efficiency to 263.2 μmol·h−1·g−1 was achieved. Further addition of BFO to reach 50% resulted in the evolution of 600 μmol·h−1·g−1 of H2, which represents the optimal outcome [160]. Table 5 summarizes the different BFO-based materials tested for solar water splitting.
Recent research has demonstrated that it is possible to design a complex system comprising more than two semiconductors. In this context, a triple heterojunction photoanode comprising WO3/BiVO4 (BVO)/BiFeO3 (BFO) porous layers was fabricated and deposited on an FTO glass substrate using a sol–gel spin-coating technique. The band gap energy values for pure WO3, BVO, and BFO of 3, 2.42, and 2.14 eV, respectively, were measured. The WO3/BVO/BFO heterojunction photoanode presents much higher solar water splitting performance with a maximum photocurrent of 46.9 mA⋅cm−2 at 2.53 V vs. RHE, in contrast to that of the individual component following the order BFO > WO3 > BVO with their corresponding photocurrent values of 17.5 > 6.5 > 4.6 mA⋅cm−2 at the same potential. Nevertheless, the photocurrent of the WO3/BVO double-layer sample was slightly higher than that of the WO3/BVO/BFO sample at 1.23 V vs. RHE, possibly as a result of the reduced porosity caused by BFO deposition. This reduction in surface area subsequently impacts the interaction between the electrolyte and the photoanode. Furthermore, due to scattering and light trapping, the light absorbance of the double layer heterojunction is greater than that of the triple layer heterojunction (Figure 7f). In fact, the WO3/BVO/BFO triple layer shows a much higher photocurrent at higher voltages, which can be attributed to the formation of a p-n junction and a self-biasing field of the BFO [161]. To boost the photocatalytic performance, Xu et al. developed a Z-scheme core@shell heterostructure piezo-photocatalyst for the first time by combining covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and piezoelectric material which is BFO-based. The BiFeO3@TpPa-1-COF (BFO@COF20 C) photocatalyst demonstrated exceptional H2 and O2 generation rates of 1416.4 and 708.2 mol·h–1·g–1, respectively, under ultrasonication and simulated solar irradiation, exceeding the previously reported photocatalysts and piezoelectric materials for solar water splitting [168].

4. Summary and Outlook

This work demonstrated the outstanding physico-chemical properties of BFO-based nanomaterials, in particular their unique electronic structure and crystal symmetry. These characteristics play a major role in their remarkable multiferroic properties at room temperature, making them standout materials exhibiting high photocatalytic performances in the entire visible region of the solar spectrum. In the pursuit of optimizing their photocatalytic performances, alloying, substitution, and doping are among the strategies adopted to adjust the energy band structure leading to an improved photocatalytic performance. Based on our investigations, doping appeared to be more effective for tailoring their photocatalytic properties for enhanced dye photodegradation, while forming heterojunctions is more suitable for solar-driven water splitting.
Yet, these multiferroic nanomaterials were not evaluated through an operando condition such as under external electric field excitation to take advantage of the high polarization they have that would yield a further enhancement in their photocatalytic performance. We believe that future developments need to take this aspect into account and propose novel experimental setups that include electrical and/or magnetic field monitoring during the photocatalysis process. It has to be noted that this class of materials belong to the transition metal oxide perovskites that have tunable physical properties while being very stable under aggressive environment making them the future electrodes for high-performing photoelectrocatalytic reactions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.N., M.B. and M.J.; methodology, validation, M.B., M.E.M. and M.J.; investigation, Y.N., M.B. and B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.N., M.B. and M.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.N., B.A. and M.J.; supervision, M.E.M. and M.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AM 1.5GAir Mass 1.5 Global Spectrum
CBConduction Band
CPEConstant Phase Elements
CSConventional Sintering
DEADiethaloamine
EISElectrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
FTOFluorine doped Tin Oxide
HERHydrogen Evolution Reaction
ITOIndium Tin Oxide
LSVLinear Sweep Voltammetry
MBMethylene Blue
MWSMicrowave Sintering
NPsNanoparticles
OEROxygen Evolution Reaction
PCPhotocatalysis
PECPhotoelectrochemical
pHPotential of Hydrogen
PLPhotoluminescence
PLDPulsed Laser Deposition
PMsPerovskite materials
PrRemanent Polarization
PVPhotovoltaic
RHEReversible Hydrogen Electrode
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
RTRoom Temperature
SCESaturated Calomel Electrode
SEMScanning Electron Microscope
SGSol–gel
STHSolar-to-Hydrogen
TCTetracycline hydrochloride
UVUltra Violet
VBValence Band
WSWater Splitting
εrDielectric Constant

References

  1. Barbir, F.; Veziro, T.N.; Plass, H.J. Environmental damage due to fossil fuels use. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1990, 15, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hassan, A.; Ilyas, S.Z.; Jalil, A.; Ullah, Z. Monetization of the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 21204–21211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geerken, T.G.; Timmermans, V.T.; Lassaux, S.L. Hydrogen and its Applications: Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies and Well-to-Wheel Studies. Hysociety 2005, 1–11. Available online: http://www2.ulg.ac.be/cior-fsa/publicat/erscp_h2.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  4. Burdack, A.; Duarte-Herrera, L.; López-Jiménez, G.; Polklas, T.; Vasco-Echeverri, O. Techno-economic calculation of green hydrogen production and export from Colombia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 48, 1685–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shahin, M.S.; Orhan, M.F.; Saka, K.; Hamada, A.T.; Uygul, F. Energy assessment of an integrated hydrogen production system. Int. J. Thermofluids 2023, 17, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Younas, M.; Shafique, S.; Faisal, A.; Hafeez, A.; Javed, F.; Mustafa, M.; Rehman, F. Hydrogen Production through Water Vapors using Optimized Corona-DBD Hybrid Plasma Micro-Reactor. Fuel 2023, 331, 125838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hren, R.; Vujanović, A.; Van Fan, Y.; Klemeš, J.J.; Krajnc, D.; Čuček, L. Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martins, F.; Felgueiras, C.; Smitkova, M.; Caetano, N. Analysis of Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts in European Countries. Energies 2019, 12, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Younas, M.; Shafique, S.; Hafeez, A.; Javed, F.; Rehman, F. An Overview of Hydrogen Production: Current Status, Potential, and Challenges. Fuel 2022, 316, 123317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ardo, F.M.; Lim, J.W.; Ramli, A.; Lam, M.K.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Abdelfattah, E.A.; Shahid, M.K.; Usman, A.; Wongsakulphasatch, S.; Sahrin, N.T. A review in redressing challenges to produce sustainable hydrogen from microalgae for aviation industry. Fuel 2022, 330, 125646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aydin, M.I.; Dincer, I. An assessment study on various clean hydrogen production methods. Energy 2022, 245, 123090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehanovic, D.; Peloquin, J.F.; Dufault, J.F.; Fréchette, L.; Picard, M. Comparative techno-economic study of typically combustion-less hydrogen production alternatives. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 48, 7945–7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Midilli, A.; Kucuk, H.; Topal, M.E.; Akbulut, U.; Dincer, I. A comprehensive review on hydrogen production from coal gasification: Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 25385–25412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dincer, I.; Acar, C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 40, 11094–11111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I.; Crawford, C. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 26238–26264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cho, H.H.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T.J. A review on global warming potential, challenges and opportunities of renewable hydrogen production technologies. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2023, 35, e00567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tahir, M.B.; Riaz, K.N. Fundamentals of Photocatalysis for Energy Conversion. In Nanomaterials and Photocatalysis in Chemistry; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeeshan, H.M.; Sharma, S.; Panahi, M.; Voloshina, E.; Dedkov, Y. Semiconducting eutectic materials for photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry applications: A perspective. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 25720–25734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, R. Latest progress in hydrogen production from solar water splitting via photocatalysis, photoelectrochemical, and photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical solutions. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, W.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, M.; Meng, X.; Chen, M.; Feng, Y.; Chen, X.; Ding, Y. Recent advances and perspectives in cobalt-based heterogeneous catalysts for photocatalytic water splitting, CO2 reduction, and N2 fixation. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 2273–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Isaacs, M.; Garcia-Navarro, J.; Ong, W.J.; Jiménez-Calvo, P. Is Photocatalysis the Next Technology to Produce Green Hydrogen to Enable the Net Zero Emissions Goal? Glob. Chall. 2022, 7, 2200165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fajrina, N.; Tahir, M. A critical review in strategies to improve photocatalytic water splitting towards hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 540–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.; Chang, J.; Tang, W.; Xie, W.; Ang, Y.S. 2D materials and heterostructures for photocatalytic water-splitting: A theoretical perspective. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 293002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Progress in designing effective photoelectrodes for solar water splitting. Cuihua Xuebao/Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, C.; Moniz, S.J.A.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T.; Tang, J. Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting—Materials and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4645–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Joy, J.; Mathew, J.; George, S.C. Nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting—Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 4804–4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Minggu, L.J.; Daud, W.R.W.; Kassim, M.B. An overview of photocells and photoreactors for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 5233–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhatt, M.D.; Lee, J.S. Recent theoretical progress in the development of photoanode materials for solar water splitting photoelectrochemical cells. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2015, 3, 10632–10659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeong, S.Y.; Song, J.; Lee, S. Photoelectrochemical Device Designs toward Practical Solar Water Splitting: A Review on the Recent Progress of BiVO4 and BiFeO3 Photoanodes. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Tan, H.L.; Toe, C.Y.; Scott, J.; Wang, L.; Amal, R.; Ng, Y.H. Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Systems: Similarities and Differences. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1904717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, Z.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, L.; Sun, Z. MXene: A promising photocatalyst for water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2016, 4, 11446–11452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, P.; Jang, J.W.; Lee, J.S. Key Strategies to Advance the Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Performance of α-Fe2O3 Photoanode. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 157–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seabold, J.A.; Neale, N.R. All first row transition metal oxide photoanode for water splitting based on Cu3V2O8. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, L.J.; Luo, J.W.; He, T.; Wei, S.H.; Li, S.S. Photocorrosion-Limited Maximum Efficiency of Solar Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018, 10, 064059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zheng, G.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Murugadoss, V.; Zu, G.; Che, H.; Lai, C.; Li, H.; Ding, T.; Gao, Q.; et al. Tungsten oxide nanostructures and nanocomposites for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 18968–18994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, X.; Zhou, G.; Dong, X.; Hu, J. Interface Band Engineering Charge Transfer for 3D MoS2 Photoanode to Boost Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3829–3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Sun, H.; Huang, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, J. Band Structure Tuning of TiO2 for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7451–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lv, R.; Wang, T.; Su, F.; Zhang, P.; Li, C.; Gong, J. Facile synthesis of ZnO nanopencil arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rahman, G.; Joo, O.S. Photoelectrochemical water splitting at nanostructured α-Fe2O3 electrodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 13989–13997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kalanur, S.S.; Duy, L.T.; Seo, H. Recent Progress in Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Activity of WO3 Photoanodes. Top. Catal. 2018, 61, 1043–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhu, M.; Li, Y.; Li, W. Interfacial Charge Transport in 1D TiO2 Based Photoelectrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Small 2021, 17, e1903378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Muzakkar, M.Z.; Umar, A.A.; Ilham, I.; Saputra, Z.; Zulfikar, L.; Maulidiyah, M.; Wibowo, D.; Ruslan, R.; Nurdin, M. Chalcogenide material as high photoelectrochemical performance Se doped TiO2/Ti electrode: Its application for Rhodamine B degradation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ozawa, K.; Emori, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Yukawa, R.; Yamamoto, S.; Hobara, R.; Fujikawa, K.; Sakama, H.; Matsuda, I. Electron-hole recombination time at TiO2 single-crystal surfaces: Influence of surface band bending. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1953–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Z.; Huang, H.; Li, G.; Yan, X.; Yu, Z.; Wang, K.; Wu, Y. Advances in engineering perovskite oxides for photochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. In Applied Physics Reviews; American Institute of Physics Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guerrero, A.; Bisquert, J. Perovskite semiconductors for photoelectrochemical water splitting applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 2, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grinberg, I.; West, D.V.; Torres, M.; Gou, G.; Stein, D.M.; Wu, L.; Chen, G.; Gallo, E.M.; Akbashev, A.R.; Davies, P.K.; et al. Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials. Nature 2013, 503, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Young, S.M.; Rappe, A.M. First principles calculation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 116601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, L.; Salvador, P.A.; Rohrer, G.S. Photocatalysts with internal electric fields. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 24–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jung, H.S.; Park, N.G. Perovskite Solar Cells: From Materials to Devices. Small 2015, 11, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sophocleous, M. Global and regional water availability and demand: Prospects for the future. Nat. Resour. Res. 2004, 13, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmed, S.; Rasul, M.G.; Martens, W.N.; Brown, R.; Hashib, M.A. Advances in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Degradation of Phenols and Dyes in Wastewater: A Review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 215, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pandey, A.; Kumar, R.R.; Kalidasan, B.; Laghari, I.A.; Samykano, M.; Kothari, R.; Abusorrah, A.M.; Sharma, K.; Tyagi, V. Utilization of solar energy for wastewater treatment: Challenges and progressive research trends. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 297, 113300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Al-Nuaim, M.A.; Alwasiti, A.A.; Shnain, Z.Y. The photocatalytic process in the treatment of polluted water. Chem. Pap. 2022, 77, 677–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kanhere, P.; Chen, Z. A Review on Visible Light Active Perovskite-Based Photocatalysts. Molecules 2014, 19, 19995–20022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, H.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhuang, J.; Guo, H.; Ma, Z.; Ye, Y. Enhanced photovoltaic properties of PbTiO3-based ferroelectric thin films prepared by a sol-gel process. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 13063–13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wani, A.L.; Ara, A.; Usmani, J.A. Lead toxicity: A review. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2015, 8, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Castillo, M.E.; Shvartsman, V.V.; Gobeljic, D.; Gao, Y.; Landers, J.; Wende, H.; Lupascu, D.C. Effect of particle size on ferroelectric and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 nanopowders. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 355701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qiao, X.; Geng, W.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, D.; Yang, Y.; Meng, J.; He, J.; Bi, K.; Cui, M.; Chou, X. Robust in-plane polarization switching in epitaxial BiFeO3 films. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 852, 156988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deng, J.; Banerjee, S.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Smith, Y.R.; Misra, M. Bismuth Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Photocatalyst for Solar Hydrogen Generation from Water. J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl. 2011, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gao, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Niu, F.; Huang, Q.; Qin, L.; Sun, X.; Huang, Y. Synthesis of BiFeo3 nanoparticles for the visible-light induced photocatalytic property. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 59, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, N.; Luo, X.; Han, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Olin, H.; Yang, Y. Structure, Performance, and Application of BiFeO3 Nanomaterials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qiao, L.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, H.Y.; Singh, D.J.; Zhang, K.H.L.; Liu, Z.J.; Zu, X.T.; Li, S. Orbital controlled band gap engineering of tetragonal BiFeO3 for optoelectronic applications. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2018, 6, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shah, J.H.; Malik, A.S.; Idris, A.M.; Rasheed, S.; Han, H.; Li, C. Intrinsic photocatalytic water oxidation activity of Mn-doped ferroelectric BiFeO3. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yun, Q.; Xing, W.; Chen, J.; Gao, W.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, S. Effect of Ho and Mn co-doping on structural, ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties of BiFeO3 thin films. Thin Solid Films 2015, 584, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Preethi, A.J.; Ragam, M. Effect of doping in multiferroic BFO: A review. J. Adv. Dielectr. 2021, 11, 2130001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xian, T.; Yang, H.; Dai, J.F.; Wei, Z.Q.; Ma, J.Y.; Feng, W.J. Photocatalytic properties of BiFeO3 nanoparticles with different sizes. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1573–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dhawan, A.; Sudhaik, A.; Raizada, P.; Thakur, S.; Ahamad, T.; Thakur, P.; Singh, P.; Hussain, C.M. BiFeO3-based Z scheme photocatalytic systems: Advances, mechanism, and applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 117, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, S.; Lin, Y.H.; Zhang, B.P.; Wang, Y.; Nan, C.W. Controlled fabrication of BiFeO3 uniform microcrystals and their magnetic and photocatalytic behaviors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 2903–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, F.; Chen, X.Y.; Yin, K.B.; Dong, S.; Ren, Z.F.; Yuan, F.; Yu, T.; Zou, Z.G.; Liu, J. Visible-Light Photocatalytic Properties of Weak Magnetic BiFeO3 Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2889–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, C.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, X. Spectroscopic study on the valence state of Fe in BiFeO3. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 311, 123145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Arifiadi, A.N.; Kim, K.T.; Khairani, I.Y.; Park, C.B.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, S.K. Synthesis and multiferroic properties of high-purity CoFe2O4–BiFeO3 nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 867, 159008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Benyoussef, M.; Saitzek, S.; Rajput, N.S.; Courty, M.; El Marssi, M.; Jouiad, M. Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Low-Dimensional BiFeO3 System for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts 2022, 12, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sando, D.; Carrétéro, C.; Grisolia, M.N.; Barthélémy, A.; Nagarajan, V.; Bibes, M. Revisiting the Optical Band Gap in Epitaxial BiFeO3 Thin Films. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1700836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Arazas, A.P.R.; Wu, C.C.; Chang, K.S. Hydrothermal fabrication and analysis of piezotronic-related properties of BiFeO3 nanorods. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14158–14162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Subhiksha, V.; Kokilavani, S.; Khan, S.S. Recent advances in degradation of organic pollutant in aqueous solutions using bismuth based photocatalysts: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Benyoussef, M.; Saitzek, S.; Rajput, N.S.; El Marssi, M.; Jouiad, M. Effect of Sr and Ti substitutions on optical and photocatalytic properties of Bi1-xSrxFe1-xTixO3 nanomaterials. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 869–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhou, T.; Zhai, T.; Shen, H.; Wang, J.; Min, R.; Ma, K.; Zhang, G. Strategies for enhancing performance of perovskite bismuth ferrite photocatalysts (BiFeO3): A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 2023, 339, 139678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Liu, L.; Huang, H. Ferroelectrics in Photocatalysis. Chem. A Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202103975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhu, Q.; Zhang, K.; Li, D.; Li, N.; Xu, J.; Bahnemann, D.W.; Wang, C. Polarization-enhanced photocatalytic activity in non-centrosymmetric materials based photocatalysis: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 131681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shvartsman, V.V.; Kleemann, W.; Haumont, R.; Kreisel, J. Large bulk polarization and regular domain structure in ceramic BiFeO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 172115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lebeugle, D.; Colson, D.; Forget, A.; Viret, M. Very large spontaneous electric polarization in BiFeO3 single crystals at room temperature and its evolution under cycling fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 022907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, Y.P.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, M.F.; Chen, X.Y.; Liu, J.M.; Liu, Z.G. Room-temperature saturated ferroelectric polarization in BiFeO3 ceramics synthesized by rapid liquid phase sintering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 1731–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Song, S.H.; Zhu, Q.S.; Weng, L.Q.; Mudinepalli, V.R. A comparative study of dielectric, ferroelectric and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 multiferroic ceramics synthesized by conventional and spark plasma sintering techniques. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wahba, M.A.; Yakout, S.M.; Youssef, A.M.; Sharmoukh, W.; Elsayed, A.M.; Khalil, M.S. Chelating Agents Assisted Rapid Synthesis of High Purity BiFeO3: Remarkable Optical, Electrical, and Magnetic Characteristics. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2022, 35, 3689–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tahir, M.; Riaz, S.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, U.; Atiq, S.; Iqbal, M.J.; Naseem, S. Anomalous dielectric behavior and correlation of barrier hopping mechanism with ferroelectricity in solvent assisted phase pure bismuth iron oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 119, 110543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Banoth, P.; Sohan, A.; Kandula, C.; Kollu, P. Structural, dielectric, magnetic, and ferroelectric properties of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) synthesized by a solvothermal process using hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) as precipitating agent. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 32817–32826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Teague, J.R.; Gerson, R.; James, W.J. Dielectric hysteresis in single crystal BiFeO3. Solid State Commun. 1970, 8, 1073–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. BaoLin, F.; Hao, X.; ZhaoXian, X. Articles Structure and multiferroic properties of Y-doped BiFeO3 ceramics. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2010, 55, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Layek, S.; Verma, H.C. Magnetic and Dielectric Properties of Multiferroic BiFeO3 Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Novel Citrate Combustion Method. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2015, 3, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Du, Y.; Cheng, Z.X.; Shahbazi, M.; Collings, E.W.; Dou, S.X.; Wang, X.L. Enhancement of ferromagnetic and dielectric properties in lanthanum doped BiFeO3 by hydrothermal synthesis. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 490, 637–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Suresh, P.; Srinath, S. A comprative study of sol-gel and solid-state prepared La3+ doped multiferroic BiFeO3. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2014, 5, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, G.D.; Dai, J.Q.; Liang, X.L. Enhanced ferroelectric properties in La-doped BiFeO3 films by the sol-gel method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023, 105, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sheoran, N.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V.; Banerjee, A. Structural, Optical, and Multiferroic Properties of Yttrium (Y3+)-Substituted BiFeO3 Nanostructures. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2020, 33, 2017–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dhir, G.; Verma, N.K. Correlation of spin, size and structure in sol-gel prepared doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1210, 128055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ozdilek, C.; Ozenbas, M. Hydrothermal synthesis of Yb-doped BiFeO3 crystallites and their structural, magnetic and electrical properties. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 27800–27808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Suresh, S.; Kathirvel, A.; Maheswari, A.U.; Sivakumar, M. Frequency dependent dielectric relaxation of Ba-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 115057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mazumder, R.; Sen, A. Effect of Pb-doping on dielectric properties of BiFeO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 475, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wrzesinska, A.; Khort, A.; Bobowska, I.; Busiakiewicz, A.; Wypych-Puszkarz, A. Influence of the La3+, Eu3+, and Er3+ Doping on Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties of BiFeO3 Nanoparticles Synthesized by Microwave-Assisted Solution Combustion Method. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019, 5394325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rani, S.; Sanghi, S.; Agarwal, A.; Kumar, R.; Singh, O. Crystal structure, magnetic and dielectric properties of Er-doped BiFeO3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2022, 128, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shinjo, Y.; Mori, M.; Fujihara, S.; Hagiwara, M. Ti doping and low-temperature sintering of BiFeO3 nanoparticles synthesized by the solvothermal method. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 32723–32729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kathirvel, A.; Krishna, K.N.I.; Ganga, R.; Maheswari, A.U.; Sivakumar, M. Enhanced magnetic, dielectric and photoconductive properties of Zr doped BiFeO3 nanostructures. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2022, 142, 115306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nadeem, M.; Khan, W.; Khan, S.; Husain, S.; Ansari, A. Tailoring dielectric properties and multiferroic behavior of nanocrystalline BiFeO3 via Ni doping. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 164105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Saxena, P.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, P.; Varshney, D. Improved dielectric and ferroelectric properties of dual-site substituted rhombohedral structured BiFeO3 multiferroics. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 682, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Godara, S.; Kumar, B. Effect of Ba-Nb co-doping on the structural, dielectric, magnetic and ferroelectric properties of BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 6912–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xu, D.; Zhao, W.; Cao, W.; Li, W.; Fei, W. Electrical properties of Li and Nb modified BiFeO3 ceramics with reduced leakage current. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 4217–4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sharif, M.K.; Khan, M.A.; Warsi, M.F.; Ramzan, M.; Hussain, A. Structural and ferroelectric properties of hafnium substituted BiFeO3 multiferroics synthesized via auto combustion technique. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 20648–20655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Priyadharsini, P.; Pradeep, A.; Sathyamoorthy, B.; Chandrasekaran, G. Enhanced multiferroic properties in la and Ce co-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2014, 75, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sen, S.; Mondal, A.; Parida, R.K.; Parida, B.N. Improved optical, dielectric, impedance, and magnetic properties of (BiFeO3)0.6(CaTiO3)0.4 for multifunctional utilities. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 142, 109664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Baloni, M.; Sharma, R.C.; Singh, H.; Singh, M.K.; Kumar, A.; Sati, P.C.; Khan, B.; Thakur, V.N. Effect of Nd doping on structural, dielectric, magnetic and ferroelectric properties of 0.8BiFeO3–0.2PbTiO3 solid solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 905, 164228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ren, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, F.; Liu, G. Tuning of electric and magnetic properties of BiFeO3-SrTiO3 solid solution ceramics by site-specific doping of Mn. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 877, 160239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ji, C.; Fan, T.; Chen, G.; Bai, X.; Wang, J.; He, J.; Cai, W.; Gao, R.; Deng, X.; Wang, Z.; et al. Influence of sintering method on microstructure, electrical and magnetic properties of BiFeO3–BaTiO3 solid solution ceramics. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 20, 100419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zia, L.; Jaffari, G.H.; Khan, N.A.; Rahman, J.U.; Lee, S.; Shah, S.I. Identification and comparison of peculiarities in physical properties of multiferroic morphotrophic phase boundary sintered BiFeO3-xPbTiO3 nano-ceramics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2021, 150, 109868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shankar, S.; Maurya, I.; Raj, A.; Singh, S.; Thakur, O.P.; Jayasimhadri, M. Dielectric and tunable ferroelectric properties in BiFeO3–BiCoO3–BaTiO3 ternary compound. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2020, 126, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, X.; Yan, J.; Shi, R.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Du, Q.; Qi, X. Structural, dielectric, and multiferroic properties of Ta2O5-modified BiFeO3–BaTiO3–LaFeO3 solid solutions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tang, Z.; Zhuang, J.; Bokov, A.A.; Luo, Z.; Kubrin, S.P.; Raevski, I.P.; Ma, M.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. Multiscale Domain Structures and Ferroic Properties of Dy-Modified BiFeO3-PbTiO3 Single Crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 3082–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Masso, R.; Tripathy, S.N.; Aponte, F.A.; Pradhan, D.K.; Martinez, R.; Palai, R. Structural and magnetodielectric properties of BiFeO3-GdMnO3 multiferroics. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 016302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kumar, N.; Narayan, B.; Singh, A.K.; Kumar, S. Enhanced magneto-capacitance in Sr2+ modified BiFeO3–PbTiO3 solid solutions. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 252, 123313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Praharaj, S.; Singha, A.; Rout, D. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of lead-free Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-SrTiO3-BiFeO3 ternary system. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 867, 159114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ponraj, C.; Vinitha, G.; Daniel, J. Visible light photocatalytic activity of Mn-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Int. J. Green Energy 2020, 17, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gao, T.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Q.; Niu, F.; Huang, X.; Qin, L.; Huang, Y. A review: Preparation of bismuth ferrite nanoparticles and its applications in visible-light induced photocatalyses. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2015, 40, 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sharmin, F.; Basith, M.A. Highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of hazardous industrial and pharmaceutical pollutants using gadolinium doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 901, 163604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mohan, S.; Subramanian, B.; Bhaumik, I.; Gupta, P.K.; Jaisankar, S.N. Nanostructured Bi(1−x)Gd(x)FeO3—A multiferroic photocatalyst on its sunlight driven photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 16871–16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shi, J.; Guo, L. ABO3-based photocatalysts for water splitting. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2012, 22, 592–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Guo, R.; Fang, L.; Dong, W.; Zheng, F.; Shen, M. Enhanced photocatalytic activity and ferromagnetism in Gd doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 21390–21396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Vanga, P.R.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Ashok, M. Structural, magnetic and photocatalytic properties of La and alkaline co-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 40, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sakar, M.; Balakumar, S.; Saravanan, P.; Bharathkumar, S. Compliments of confinements: Substitution and dimension induced magnetic origin and band-bending mediated photocatalytic enhancements in Bi1−xDyxFeO3 particulate and fiber nanostructures. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 10667–10679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhou, J.; Jiang, L.; Chen, D.; Liang, J.; Qin, L.; Bai, L.; Sun, X.; Huang, Y. Facile synthesis of Er-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles for enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2019, 90, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Jin, W.; Zhu, C. Ferromagnetism and enhanced photocatalytic activity in Nd doped BiFeO3 nanopowders. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 9929–9940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hu, Z.; Chen, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, N.; Qin, L.; Huang, Y. Facile synthesis of Sm-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles for enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2017, 220, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Soltani, T.; Lee, B.K. Comparison of benzene and toluene photodegradation under visible light irradiation by Ba-doped BiFeO3 magnetic nanoparticles with fast sonochemical synthesis. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017, 16, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Ponraj, C.; Kumar, P.S.; Sarkar, S.; Krishnamoorthi, C.; Manikandan, N.; Vinitha, G.; Daniel, J. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of magnetic cobalt doped BiFeO3. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 31, 102050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jaffari, Z.H.; Lam, S.M.; Sin, J.C.; Zeng, H.; Mohamed, A.R. Magnetically recoverable Pd-loaded BiFeO3 microcomposite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance for pollutant, bacterial and fungal elimination. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 236, 116195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Umar, M.; Mahmood, N.; Awan, S.U.; Fatima, S.; Mahmood, A.; Rizwan, S. Rationally designed La and Se co-doped bismuth ferrites with controlled bandgap for visible light photocatalysis. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 17148–17156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kebede, M.T.; Devi, S.; Tripathi, B.; Chauhan, S.; Dillu, V. Structural transition and enhanced magnetic, optical and photocatalytic properties of novel Ce–Ni co-doped BiFeO3 nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 152, 107086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Vanga, P.R.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Ashok, M. Effect of (Nd, Ni) co-doped on the multiferroic and photocatalytic properties of BiFeO3. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 72, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Soltani, T.; Tayyebi, A.; Lee, B.K. BiFeO3/BiVO4 p−n heterojunction for efficient and stable photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible-light irradiation. Catal. Today 2020, 340, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bargozideh, S.; Tasviri, M.; Kianifar, M. Construction of novel magnetic BiFeO3/MoS2 composite for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance towards purification of dye pollutants. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 102, 6390–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Xu, J.; Qin, T.; Chen, W.; Lv, J.; Zeng, X.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.-Y.; Zhou, J. Synergizing piezoelectric and plasmonic modulation of Ag/BiFeO3 fibrous heterostructure toward boosted photoelectrochemical energy conversion. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ghorbani, M.; Sheibani, S.; Abdizadeh, H.; Golobostanfard, M.R. Modified BiFeO3/rGO nanocomposite by controlled synthesis to enhance adsorption and visible-light photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 22, 1250–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, X.; He, X.-S.; Li, C.-Y.; Liu, S.-L.; Lu, W.; Xiang, Z.; Wang, Y. Sonocatalytic removal of tetracycline in the presence of S-scheme Cu2O/BiFeO3 heterojunction: Operating parameters, mechanisms, degradation pathways and toxicological evaluation. J. Water Process. Eng. 2023, 51, 103345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Sun, J.; Wu, X.; Liang, H.; Qu, Y.; Jing, L. BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 S-scheme heterojunction hollow nanospheres for high-efficiency photocatalytic o-chlorophenol degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 319, 121893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Marwat, M.A.; Ullah, H.; Usman, M.; Ehsan, M.A.; Zhang, H.; Khan, M.F.; Ali, S.; Yousaf, M. Significantly improved photocatalytic activity of the SnO2/BiFeO3 heterojunction for pollutant degradation and mechanism. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14789–14798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Subramanian, Y.; Ramasamy, V.; Karthikeyan, R.; Srinivasan, G.R.; Arulmozhi, D.; Gubendiran, R.K.; Sriramalu, M. Investigations on the enhanced dye degradation activity of heterogeneous BiFeO3–GdFeO3 nanocomposite photocatalyst. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Niu, F.; Chen, D.; Qin, L.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Y. Facile Synthesis of Highly Efficient p–n Heterojunction CuO/BiFeO3 Composite Photocatalysts with Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 3279–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ghasemi, A.; Hasheminiasari, M.; Masoudpanah, S.M.; Safizade, B. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Two-Pot-Synthesized BiFeO3–ZnFe2O4 Heterojunction Nanocomposite. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 2225–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liao, X.; Li, T.-T.; Ren, H.-T.; Mao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lin, J.-H.; Lou, C.-W. Enhanced photocatalytic performance through the ferroelectric synergistic effect of p-n heterojunction BiFeO3/TiO2 under visible-light irradiation. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 10786–10795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Banoth, P.; Narsaiah, B.P.; De Los Santos Valladares, L.; Kargin, J.; Kollu, P. Single-phase BiFeO3 and BiFeO3–Fe2O3 nanocomposite photocatalysts for photodegradation of organic dye pollutants. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 2646–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ramezanalizadeh, H.; Manteghi, F. Design and development of a novel BiFeO3/CuWO4 heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic performance for the degradation of organic dyes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 338, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Tran, V.T.; Chen, D.H. Ag2O@BiFeO3 heterostructure composite coupling built-in electric field with piezopotential for enhanced photocatalytic pollutant degradation and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 625, 157175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cui, H.; Wang, Z.; Cao, G.; Wu, Y.; Song, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Mu, J.; Chou, X. Facilitated Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B over One-Step Synthesized Honeycomb-Like BiFeO3/g-C3N4 Catalyst. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Maeda, K. Photocatalytic water splitting using semiconductor particles: History and recent developments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2011, 12, 237–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Qi, J.; Liu, H.; Feng, M.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, A.; Lü, W. Enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction in Sr doped BiFeO3 by achieving the coexistence of ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism at room temperature. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 53, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Man, S.; Leng, X.; Bai, J.; Kan, S.; Cui, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, L. Enhancement of photoelectrochemical performance of BiFeO3 by Sm3+ doping. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 10255–10264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Vishwakarma, A.K.; Tripathi, P.; Srivastava, A.; Sinha, A.S.K.; Srivastava, O.N. Band gap engineering of Gd and Co doped BiFeO3 and their application in hydrogen production through photoelectrochemical route. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 22677–22686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Khoomortezaei, S.; Abdizadeh, H.; Golobostanfard, M.R. Ferro-photocatalytic Enhancement of Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Using the WO3/BiFeO3 Heterojunction. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 9623–9634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wu, X.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Jiang, L.; Xi, J.; Du, G.; Ji, Z. Ferroelectric enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting in BiFeO3/TiO2 composite photoanode. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 783, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, T.; Shen, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiong, R.; Shi, J.; Wei, J. Facial Synthesis and Photoreaction Mechanism of BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 Heterojunction Nanofibers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4630–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yan, X.; Pu, R.; Xie, R.; Zhang, B.; Shi, Y.; Liu, W.; Ma, G.; Yang, N. Design and fabrication of Bi2O3/BiFeO3 heterojunction film with improved photoelectrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 552, 149442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bera, S.; Ghosh, S.; Shyamal, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Basu, R.N. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation using gold decorated BiFeO3 heterostructures as an efficient catalyst under visible light irradiation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 194, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kolivand, A.; Sharifnia, S. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water splitting by Z-scheme CdS/BiFeO3 heterojunction without using sacrificial agent. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 2739–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Khoomortezaei, S.; Abdizadeh, H.; Golobostanfard, M.R. Triple Layer Heterojunction WO3/BiVO4/BiFeO3 Porous Photoanode for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 6428–6439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhu, J.; He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Cao, D. BiFeO3/Cu2O Heterojunction for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Under Visible-Light Irradiation. Catal. Lett. 2021, 151, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, P.; Wang, T.; Gong, J. Mechanistic Understanding of the Plasmonic Enhancement for Solar Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5328–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Ghosh, S.; Mallik, A.K.; Basu, R.N. Enhanced photocatalytic activity and photoresponse of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanofibers decorated with gold nanoparticle under visible light. Sol. Energy 2018, 159, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tiburcio, J.; Sacari, E.; Chacaltana, J.; Medina, J.; Gamarra, F.; Polo, C.; Mamani, E.; Quispe, A. Influence of Cr Doping on Structural, Optical, and Photovoltaic Properties of BiFeO3 Synthesized by Sol-Gel Method. Energies 2023, 16, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Anjum, N.; Lamia, S.N.E.; Arafat, M.Y.; Mahboob, M.; Basith, M.A. Photocatalytic properties of Ti-doped BiFeO3 bulk and nanoparticles for solar hydrogen fuel generation. In AIP Conference Proceedings; American Institute of Physics Inc.: Melville, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Haydous, F.; Scarisoreanu, N.D.; Birjega, R.; Ion, V.; Lippert, T.; Dumitrescu, N.; Moldovan, A.; Andrei, A.; Teodorescu, V.S.; Ghica, C.; et al. Rolling dopant and strain in Y-doped BiFeO3 epitaxial thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Xu, M.; Lu, M.; Qin, G.; Wu, X.; Yu, T.; Zhang, L.; Li, K.; Cheng, X.; Lan, Y. Piezo-Photocatalytic Synergy in BiFeO3@COF Z-Scheme Heterostructures for High-Efficiency Overall Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202210700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Sepahvand, H.; Sharifnia, S. Photocatalytic overall water splitting by Z-scheme g-C3N4/BiFeO3 heterojunction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 23658–23668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Arif, N.; Ma, Y.; Iqbal, M.A.; Zafar, M.N.; Liang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zeng, Y.-J. Enhanced charge separation in dual Z-scheme Au decorated LaFeO3-g-C3N4-BiFeO3 system for efficient H2 production. Fuel 2023, 336, 126832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Yan, W.; Wang, H.; Mao, W.; Cui, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X. Synergizing the internal electric field and ferroelectric polarization of the BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 Z-scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Publications related to a BFO photocatalyst from the period between 2010 and 2023, (b) BFO crystal structure (Rhombohedral R3c) with correspondence of Bi, A-Site, and Fe, B-site and (c) BFO band alignment concerning water redox potentials (reproduced with permission from [76]).
Figure 1. (a) Publications related to a BFO photocatalyst from the period between 2010 and 2023, (b) BFO crystal structure (Rhombohedral R3c) with correspondence of Bi, A-Site, and Fe, B-site and (c) BFO band alignment concerning water redox potentials (reproduced with permission from [76]).
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g001
Figure 2. Strategies commonly adopted to control the size and morphology of BFO-based materials and their physical properties with respect to their dimensions.
Figure 2. Strategies commonly adopted to control the size and morphology of BFO-based materials and their physical properties with respect to their dimensions.
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g002
Figure 3. Effect of doping and co-doping on the band gap energy and pollutant removal efficiency of BFO under visible light.
Figure 3. Effect of doping and co-doping on the band gap energy and pollutant removal efficiency of BFO under visible light.
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g003
Figure 4. (a) Photocatalytic degradation of dye using doped BFO catalyst and (b) its degradation time and degradation efficiency.
Figure 4. (a) Photocatalytic degradation of dye using doped BFO catalyst and (b) its degradation time and degradation efficiency.
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g004
Figure 5. (a) Illustration of the synthesis procedure of the pure BFO nanofibers and Ag/BFO composites. (b) Schematic illustration of the synergy of plasmonic and piezotronic effects (reproduced with permission from Ref. [138]). (c) SEM image of BiFeO3-Ns (reproduced with permission from ref [146]). (d) SEM image of BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 nanospheres. (e) S-scheme of the BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction hollow nanospheres with an Fe–O channel for enhancing charge separation to achieve high-efficiency photocatalytic o-chlorophenol degradation (reproduced with permission from Ref. [141]).
Figure 5. (a) Illustration of the synthesis procedure of the pure BFO nanofibers and Ag/BFO composites. (b) Schematic illustration of the synergy of plasmonic and piezotronic effects (reproduced with permission from Ref. [138]). (c) SEM image of BiFeO3-Ns (reproduced with permission from ref [146]). (d) SEM image of BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 nanospheres. (e) S-scheme of the BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction hollow nanospheres with an Fe–O channel for enhancing charge separation to achieve high-efficiency photocatalytic o-chlorophenol degradation (reproduced with permission from Ref. [141]).
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g005
Figure 6. Band gap positions with respect to valence and conduction band at pH = 7 of pure BFO, Sm-doped BFO, Cr-doped BFO, Ti-doped BFO, Ca-doped BFO, Nd-doped BFO, Ga- and Co-co-doped BFO.
Figure 6. Band gap positions with respect to valence and conduction band at pH = 7 of pure BFO, Sm-doped BFO, Cr-doped BFO, Ti-doped BFO, Ca-doped BFO, Nd-doped BFO, Ga- and Co-co-doped BFO.
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g006
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of WO3, BFO, and WO3/BFO photoanodes (reproduced with permission from Ref. [155]). (b) Stable hydrogen evolution from water using BiFeO3, Bi2Fe4O9, and BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction nanofibers under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) (reprinted with permission from Ref. [157]). (c) Photoelectrochemical impedance spectra (PEIS) of BFO, Bi2O3, and Bi2O3/BFO films (reprinted with permission from Ref. [158]). (d) Comparative H2 generation data after 2 h visible-light irradiation using the catalysts of BFO nanosheets (BFO-Ns), a BFO octahedron (BFO-Oct), a cylindrical-shaped BFO (BFO-Cyl), and their heterostructures as Au/BFO-Ns, Au/BFO-Oct, and Au/BFO-Cyl (reprinted with permission from Ref. [159]). (e) Effect of internal electrical field of the BFO on charge separation in CdS (reprinted with permission from Ref. [160]). (f) UV–vis absorption spectra of WO3, BVO, BFO, WO3/BVO, and WO3/BVO/BFO photoanodes (reprinted with permission from Ref. [161]).
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of WO3, BFO, and WO3/BFO photoanodes (reproduced with permission from Ref. [155]). (b) Stable hydrogen evolution from water using BiFeO3, Bi2Fe4O9, and BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9 heterojunction nanofibers under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) (reprinted with permission from Ref. [157]). (c) Photoelectrochemical impedance spectra (PEIS) of BFO, Bi2O3, and Bi2O3/BFO films (reprinted with permission from Ref. [158]). (d) Comparative H2 generation data after 2 h visible-light irradiation using the catalysts of BFO nanosheets (BFO-Ns), a BFO octahedron (BFO-Oct), a cylindrical-shaped BFO (BFO-Cyl), and their heterostructures as Au/BFO-Ns, Au/BFO-Oct, and Au/BFO-Cyl (reprinted with permission from Ref. [159]). (e) Effect of internal electrical field of the BFO on charge separation in CdS (reprinted with permission from Ref. [160]). (f) UV–vis absorption spectra of WO3, BVO, BFO, WO3/BVO, and WO3/BVO/BFO photoanodes (reprinted with permission from Ref. [161]).
Nanomaterials 14 00051 g007
Table 1. Effect of BFO grains and particle size on its dielectric constant and remanent polarization.
Table 1. Effect of BFO grains and particle size on its dielectric constant and remanent polarization.
MaterialRoutePrecursorsSize
(nm)
ԑr
RT; 102 Hz
Pr
(µC·cm−2)
Ref.
BiFeO3 bulkSolid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3--40[80]
BiFeO3 single cristalSpontaneous crystallizationBi2O3, Fe2O3--75[81]
BiFeO3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3103-8.9[82]
BiFeO3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O32 × 102257.5[83]
BiFeO3CombustionBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Organic fuel401118-[84]
BiFeO3Sol-gelBi(NO3)3, 5H2O/Fe(NO3)3, 9H2O1284.58.2[85]
BiFeO3SolvothermalBiCl3, FeCl3·6H2O, HMTA-40006.7[86]
BiFeO3 single cristalSolid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3106-6.1[87]
BiFeO3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O32 × 1031210.3[88]
BiFeO3CombustionBi(NO3)3, 5H2O/Fe(NO3)3, 9H2O4791-[89]
Table 2. Effect of BFO grains and particle size on its dielectric constant and remanent polarization.
Table 2. Effect of BFO grains and particle size on its dielectric constant and remanent polarization.
MaterialRoutePrecursorsSize
(nm)
ԑr
RT; 102 Hz
Pr
(µC·cm−2)
Ref.
Bi0.8La0.2FeO3HydrothermalBi(NO3)3, Fe(NO3)3, La(NO3)3, KOH105225-[90]
Bi0.95La0.05FeO3Sol–gelBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, La(NO3)3⋅6H2O4 × 10250,000-[91]
Bi0.98La0.02FeO3Sol–gelBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, La(NO3)3⋅6H2O80161.8140[92]
Bi0.8Y0.2FeO3Sol–gel & combustionBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Y(NO3)3⋅6H2O4150016[93]
Bi0.85Gd0.15FeO3Sol–gelBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Gd(NO3)3.3H2O1621937[94]
Bi0.97Yb0.03FeO3& Bi0.9Yb0.1FeO3HydrothermalBi(NO3)3, Fe(NO3)3, Yb(NO3)3, KOH291500.4[95]
Bi0.985Ba0.015FeO3HydrothermalBi(NO3)3, Fe(NO3)3, Ba(NO₃)₂, KOH57125-[96]
Bi0.97Pb0.03FeO3PrecipitationBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O,
Pb(NO3)3·5H2O,
-25000.8[97]
Bi0.9Eu0.1FeO3Microwave-assistedBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Eu(NO3)3⋅6H2O18150-[98]
BiFe0.95Ti0.05O3SolvothermalBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, TiO27 × 1021000-[100]
BiFe0.85 Hf(3/4)0.15O3CombustionBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, HfCl430-0.2[106]
BiFe0.975Zr0.025O3HydrothermalBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, ZrOCl2.8H2O46366-[101]
BiFe0.99Ni0.01O3Sol–gelBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Ni(NO3)3⋅6H2O-20002.6[102]
Bi0.99La0.1Fe0.95Ni0.05O3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, La2O3, & NiO-20830.2[103]
Bi0.99Ba0.1Fe0.99Nb0.1O3Sol–gel & combustionBi(NO3)3, Fe(NO3)3, Ba(NO₃)₂, C6H4NNbO12271153.2[104]
Bi0.9La0.075Ce0.025FeO3CombustionBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, La(NO3)3⋅6H2O,
Ce(NO3)3⋅6H2O
251053.2[107]
Bi0.85Er0.15FeO3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, Er2O3,-5000.1[99]
BiFe0.99(Li0⋅5Nb0.5)0.01O3Ceramic sinteringBi2O3, Fe2O3, Li2O, Nb2O5-10500.2[105]
Table 3. BFO-based heterostructures properties, dielectric constant (ԑr), and remanent polarization (Pr).
Table 3. BFO-based heterostructures properties, dielectric constant (ԑr), and remanent polarization (Pr).
MaterialRoutePrecursorsSize
(nm)
ԑr
RT; 102 Hz
Pr
(µC·cm−2)
Ref.
(BiFeO3)0.6(CaTiO3)0.4Solid-stateCaCO3, Bi2O3, TiO2, Fe2O3-10750.1[108]
(Bi0.95Nd0.05FeO3)0.8(PbTiO3)0.2Solid-stateBi2O3, Nd2O3, Fe2O3, PbO, TiO22 × 10216250.8[109]
Mn-doped-(BiFeO3)0.5(SrTiO3)0.5Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, SrO, TiO2, MnO2-7206[110]
(BiFeO3)0.65(BaTiO3)0.35Solid-stateBaCO3, TiO2, Bi2O3, Fe2O33 × 10243003.7[111]
(BiFeO3)0.66(PbTiO3)0.34Sol–gelBi(NO3)3·5H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Pb(CH3COO)2·3H2O,
Ti[OCH(CH3)2]4
-58795[112]
[(Bi0.9Dy0.1)FeO3]0.5–(PbTiO3)0.5CombustionPbO, Bi2O3, Fe2O3, Dy2O3, TiO2-1039[115]
(BiFeO3)0.8–(GdMnO3)0.2CombustionFe(NO3)3·9H2O, Bi(NO3)3.5H2O, Gd2O3, (CH3COO)2 Mn·4H2O256880.4[116]
(BiFeO3)0.7-PbTiO3)0.3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, PbO, TiO2, SrCO31032957[117]
(Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3)0.775–(SrTiO3)0.2–BiFeO3)0.025Solid-stateNa2CO3, Bi2O3, SrCO3, Fe2O3, TiO2--24[118]
0.655BiFeO3–0.025BiCoO3–0.32BaTiO3Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, Co3O4, La2O3, BaCO3, TiO26020005[113]
0.675BiFeO3–0.3BaTiO3–0.025LaFeO3–1.25Ta2O5Solid-stateBi2O3, Fe2O3, La2O3, TiO2, Ta2O5, BaCO3-11492[114]
Table 5. BFO-based materials for solar water splitting.
Table 5. BFO-based materials for solar water splitting.
MaterialApplicationBand Gap (ev)HER/
Efficiency
Photocurrent DensityRefs.
BiFeO3Solar WS2.240 μA⋅cm−2 @ 0.6 V[72]
Bi0.95Sm0.05FeO3Photoelectrocatalytic2.20.11 mA⋅cm−2[153]
BiFe0.9Cr0.1O3Solar cells1.90.3 mA⋅cm−2[165]
BiFe0.9Ti0.1O3Solar WS2.3[166]
Bi0.85Sr0.15FeO3Solar WS0.5 mA⋅cm−2 @ 1.4 V[152]
Bi0.97Y0.03FeO3Solar WS0.7 mA⋅cm−2 @ 1.4V[167]
Bi0.875SrxFe0.875Ti0.125O3Solar WS2.5191 μmol·h−1·g−1/
0.2 μA⋅cm−2[76]
Bi0.75Gd0.25Fe1−yCoyO3Solar WS1.874.6 μmol·h−1·cm−2/
2 mA⋅cm−2 @ 1 V[154]
WO3/BiFeO3Solar WS3/2.235.2 mA⋅cm−2 @ 2 V[155]
BiFeO3/BiVO4Solar WS2.70.2 mA⋅cm−2 @ 1 V[136]
Bi2O3/BiFeO3Solar WS2.8/2.7−84 μA⋅cm−2 @ −0.7 V[158]
BiFeO3/Cu2OSolar WS2.6−0.5 mA⋅cm−2 @−0.7 V[162]
BiFeO3/TiO2Solar WS2.1/3.228.8 mA⋅cm−2 @ 1.5 V[156]
BiFeO3/Bi2Fe4O9Solar WS2.2/1.9800 μmol·g−1 for 8h/
1.8 μA⋅cm−2[157]
Au/BiFeO3Solar WS2.12.1 mmol·h−1 for 2h/
2.1 μA⋅cm−2 @ 0.6 V[159]
BiFeO3@COF Z-SchemeSolar WS1416.4 μmol·h−1·g−1/
3.8 μA⋅cm−2 @ 0.6 V[168]
WO3/BiVO4/BiFeO3Solar WS3/2.4/2.147 mA⋅cm−2 @ 2.5 V[161]
CdS/BiFeO3Solar WS2.4/2.1600 μmol·h−1·g−1/
1.2 mA⋅cm−2[160]
g-C3N4/BiFeO3 Z-schemeSolar WS2.8/2.323.31 μmol·h−1·g−1/
[169]
Z-scheme Au-LaFeO3-g-C3N4-BiFeO3Solar WS2/2.7/2698.4 μmol·h−1·g−1/
1.2 μA⋅cm−2[170]
BiFeO3/ZnIn2S4 Z-schemeSolar WS2/2.387.3 μmol·h−1·g−1/
0.5 μA⋅cm−2[171]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nassereddine, Y.; Benyoussef, M.; Asbani, B.; El Marssi, M.; Jouiad, M. Recent Advances toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Proprieties of BiFeO3-Based Materials. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14010051

AMA Style

Nassereddine Y, Benyoussef M, Asbani B, El Marssi M, Jouiad M. Recent Advances toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Proprieties of BiFeO3-Based Materials. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nassereddine, Yassine, Manal Benyoussef, Bouchra Asbani, Mimoun El Marssi, and Mustapha Jouiad. 2024. "Recent Advances toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Proprieties of BiFeO3-Based Materials" Nanomaterials 14, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14010051

APA Style

Nassereddine, Y., Benyoussef, M., Asbani, B., El Marssi, M., & Jouiad, M. (2024). Recent Advances toward Enhanced Photocatalytic Proprieties of BiFeO3-Based Materials. Nanomaterials, 14(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop