Next Article in Journal
SnO2-Based Interfacial Engineering towards Improved Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Nano-Clay-Based Biopolymeric Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tailoring of Circularly Polarized Beams Employing Bound States in the Continuum in a Designed Photonic Crystal Metasurface Nanostructure

by
Chunhao Xu
1,2,
Minghao Chao
1,2,3,
Zhizhong Liu
3,
Qingsong Liu
1,2,3,
Wenjing Zhang
1,2,
Lingyun Zhuang
1,2,3,
Bo Cheng
1,2,3,
Botao Jiang
1,2,
Jietao Liu
4,* and
Guofeng Song
1,2,3,*
1
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
College of Materials Science and Opto-Electronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Laboratory of Photonic Integrated Circuits, Xiong’an Institute of Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiong’an New Area, Baoding 071700, China
4
Institute of Intelligent Photonics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(17), 1405; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171405
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanophotonic: Structure, Devices and System)

Abstract

:
We propose a photonic crystal (PC) nanostructure that combines bound states In the continuum (BIC) with a high-quality factor up to 107 for emitting circularly polarized beams. We break the in-plane inversion symmetry of the unit cell by tilting the triangular hole of the hexagonal lattice, resulting in the conversion of a symmetrically protected BIC to a quasi-BIC. High-quality circularly polarized light is obtained efficiently by adjusting the tilt angles of the hole and the thickness of the PC layer. By changing the hole’s geometry in the unit cell, the Q-factor of circularly polarized light is further improved. The quality factor can be adjusted from 6.0 × 103 to 1.7 × 107 by deliberately changing the shape of the holes. Notably, the proposed nanostructure exhibits a large bandgap, which significantly facilitates the generation of stable single-mode resonance. The proposed structure is anticipated to have practical applications in the field of laser technology, particularly in the advancement of low-threshold PC surface emitting lasers (PCSELs).

1. Introduction

Metasurfaces have garnered significant interest in the scientific community due to their compatibility with semiconductor processing fabrication techniques, coupled with their exceptional capabilities in manipulating electromagnetic fields [1,2,3]. Metasurfaces, typically composed of layered structures with periodic variations in refractive index, exhibit a multitude of functionalities, including phase-modulating [4,5], beam steering [6], focusing [7,8,9], polarization manipulation [10,11,12,13,14], and beam shaping [15,16,17]. Among the various metasurface designs, the photonic crystal (PC) slab is a special structure that has a rigorous periodic condition. Focusing on polarization control, multiple PC structures that can generate circularly polarized light are achieved by changing the parameters of the unit structure [11,12]. However, these structures are often characterized by a low Q-factor and exhibit limited tolerance for single-mode oscillation when applied to lasers.
Recently, BICs have been applied to PCs to design and achieve high Q resonances [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. According to previous research [20], the PC structure with high Q resonance can reduce the threshold of laser emission. BICs are peculiar states that remain localized in the radiation continuum with lifetimes that diverge to infinity [25], which can be transformed into quasi-BICs by breaking the structural in-plane inversion symmetry and introducing perturbations. By utilizing this feature, some circularly polarized light emission structures with high Q-factors have been achieved [21,22,23,24]. Most structures that utilize BIC to achieve circularly polarized emission rely on the oblique incidence of light or the anisotropy of the structure [22]. Nevertheless, these structures continue to encounter challenges, including low integration, non-vertical radiation, and the complexities associated with etching processes.
In this work, we design a PC structure incorporating quasi-BICs converted from symmetry-protected BICs, to achieve circularly polarized beams. This structure is evolved from the C3 symmetric structure by introducing one type of perturbation, the tilting angle of holes θ, which supports a higher quality factor. Additionally, our proposed structure exhibits a significantly larger photonic bandgap in comparison to previously reported designs in the literature [11,12]. This enhanced photonic bandgap is advantageous as it facilitates the generation of more stable single-mode resonance. The proposed PC structure offers the ability to emit circularly polarized light while allowing for adjustment of the quality factor by modifying the shape of the holes. The proposed structure not only exhibits vertical emission beams and a straightforward manufacturing process but also distinguishes itself from other PC structures by supporting circularly polarized beams. These attributes render our design a promising candidate for the development of compact, highly integrated circularly polarized light sources in PCSELs.

2. Materials and Methods

The proposed structure of the PC is illustrated in Figure 1a, which consists of oblique triangular holes arranged in a hexagonal lattice. We consider the PC area to be infinite. As shown in Figure 1a, the left-handed circular polarization (LCP) will be transmitted, and the right-handed circular polarization (RCP) will be reflected. The structural parameters are set as a = 345 nm and L = 200 nm, where a and L refer to the lattice parameter and the side length of triangular holes, respectively. The proposed PC structure of GaAs (refractive index n = 3.55) layer (thickness t) is covered with PMMA (refractive index n = 1.48), to maintain the up-down mirror symmetry and avoid the influence of additional diffraction channels. The finite element method with COMSOL is used to calculate the electromagnetic field characteristics of the structure. Figure 1b shows the schematic of the photonic-band structure of the proposed PC layer. Focusing on the Γ point, the lowest frequency mode is labeled “Mode A”, and the corresponding wavelength is located at 980 nm. The subsequent calculation and research are based on the Γ point of “Mode A”. The first electric field in Figure 1b is the surface electric field for straight holes without tilt, while another pattern shows the surface electric field of the structure of holes with 10° tilted angles θ. Comparing the two electric fields, one can see that tilting the holes have a slight effect on the electric field of “Mode A”, and both cases have a significant enhancement of the electric field on the inner side/wall of the hole boundary. The main reason is the change in the magnitude of the electric field perpendicular to the dielectric constant boundary. There is a significant difference in refractive index between the two sides near the edge of the hole, where the vertical component of the electric field on the low refractive index medium side will significantly outweigh that on the high refractive index side [26]. The presence of holes can enhance the inside electric field, and the variation of the upper surface electric field significantly affects the far-field radiation. We can adjust the tilt angle and the shape of the holes, which allow us to control the phase difference between Ex and Ey. By doing this, we can further tailor the radiation properties, such as the amplitude characteristics of the emitted light.
In addition, when the holes are vertical, the structure has C3 symmetry, which is due to the mutual cancellation of vertical radiation generated by the symmetrical positions. When the hole tilts, the C3 symmetry of the structure is disrupted, leading to the result that symmetrically protected BICs are converted into quasi-BICs. To quantify the relationship between radiation and the tilt angle, we calculated and plotted the relationship between Q-factor and tilt angles, as shown in Figure 2. The Q-factor represents the ability of light confinement, and in intrinsic mode analysis, the quality factor is equal to the ratio of the real and imaginary parts of the mode frequency. The tilt angle θ can be treated as the asymmetric factor, and the Q-factor is proportional to θ−2, which confirms that our structure can support high Q resonances arising from the distortion of symmetry-protected BICs (quasi-BICs). Employing an optical cavity with a high Q resonance significantly diminishes the laser emission threshold [20]. This attribute is advantageous as it facilitates a substantial reduction in the power consumption of laser systems, thereby enhancing their overall efficiency.

3. Results and Discussion

The results in Figure 3a show the variation of the radiation phase differences between Ex and Ey as a function of the tilt angle (2° to 34°) for varied PC-layer thicknesses t. One can see that the impact of the tilt angle on the radiation phase difference is slight, and the main factor affecting the radiation phase difference is the thickness t of the PC layer. When t = 300 nm, the phase difference between Ex and Ey reaches π/2, which is the condition for circularly polarized light. So, the thickness of the structure is set to 300 nm in the subsequent calculation and simulation. The result in Figure 3b shows rx and ry at different tilt angles in the case of t = 300 nm. In order to compare the radiation under different conditions more clearly, we normalized the radiation by taking the x-direction radiation rx as 1 at a tilt angle of 29°. rx and ry refer to the radiation in x and y directions, respectively, and the calculation method of rx and ry is shown in Appendix A. At θ = 0°, the structure exhibits C3 symmetry, and there is a symmetry-protected BIC resulting in zero radiation. As the tilt angle increases, the rx and ry increase at different speeds. As shown in Figure 3c, at a tilt angle of approximately 23°, the radiation amplitude in both directions is equal, achieving the condition of circular polarization. The result in Figure 3d shows the Stokes parameters of radiation light for different thicknesses and tilt angles. The radiation light achieves the maximum value of the Stokes parameter exclusively when the thickness is precisely set to 300 nanometers and the tilt angle is precisely 23 degrees. This specific combination of parameters is critical for optimizing the polarization characteristics of the emitted light. At this point, S3/S0 = 0.9978, and the Q-factor Q = 6.0 × 103. The Q-factor here is low since the tilt angle required to achieve circularly polarized light is too large, which leads to excessive coupling with the radiation channel.
To enhance the Q-factor of the proposed structure, we have engineered a novel configuration of holes. This design innovation effectively reduces the tilt angle necessary for the structure to emit circularly polarized light, thereby optimizing the performance of our system. Figure 4 shows the designed shape of the holes. We have maintained a constant PC slab thickness of 300 nanometers, a critical parameter that ensures a phase difference of π/2 between orthogonal polarizations. Furthermore, we have preserved the C3 symmetry within the structure, which is essential for the emergence of symmetry-protected BIC. We systematically transitioned the triangular holes to hexagonal configurations while meticulously maintaining the duty ratio constant. This approach is crucial to mitigating any unintended perturbations to the resonance frequency, thereby ensuring the stability of the optical properties throughout the morphological transformation. The shape parameter α = 2m/n − 1 represents the degree of change in shape, where m and n are the distances from the center to two vertices. At α = 0, the holes are triangular; and for α = 1, the holes are hexagonal.
We calculated the impact of changes in hole shape on the Q-factor. As shown in Figure 5a, we chose four types of shapes (α = 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9) to analyze the changes in quality factors, and all the Q-factors are approximately proportional to θ−2. At low angles, a subtle modification in the shape of the holes results in a modest enhancement of the structure’s Q-factor. This improvement is attributed to the higher symmetry-induced radiation cancellation, which effectively reduces the energy leakage from the resonant modes. Additionally, this phenomenon can be interpreted as an increase in the Q-factor in the vicinity of the Γ point. This enhancement is induced by the approach of the half-topological charge towards the Γ point [19,21,23], which alters the local density of states and consequently the resonant properties of the system. In addition, we investigated the influence of changes in hole shape on radiation polarization. Figure 5b shows the Stokes parameters at α = 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. The alteration in the shape of the holes diminishes the tilt angle necessary for the generation of circularly polarized light. This reduction in the required tilt angle is a direct consequence of the optimized hole geometry, which facilitates the coupling of light into the desired polarization state with greater efficiency. At α = 1, the radiation emanating from the inclined hole exhibits linear polarization.
Figure 6a shows the electric field components of Ex and Ey in Mode A. Due to the significant difference in refractive index between the two sides near the edge of the holes, the vertical component of the electric field on the low refractive index side of the medium will be significantly greater than that on the high refractive index side, which is the reason that the holes can enhance the internal electric field. Consequently, holes at different positions exert distinct influences on the radiation characteristics, and we only need to pay attention to the holes and the variation in the electric field at symmetrical positions. It can be observed that there is a strong electric field of Ex on the left and right sides of the hole. As the hole moves to the center of the strong electric field, the positive electric field Ex is enhanced by the hole, breaking the previous situation of cancellation, and rx rapidly increases. Changing the hole shape enhances the symmetry of the Ex electric field in the y-direction, which has little effect on the growth trend of rx as the holes move in the x-direction, as shown by the solid line in Figure 6b. In contrast to Ex, the strong electric field center of Ey is closer to the center of the cycle, which leads to an increase in ry and, correspondingly, reaching its maximum value earlier (θ = 26°). Changing the shape of the holes enhances the anti-symmetry of the Ey electric field in the y-direction and greatly reduces the radiation ry intensity due to radiation cancellation, as shown by the dashed line in Figure 6c. Therefore, the tilt angle required for equal rx and ry is reduced due to the change in hole shape, and the low radiation intensity also means an improvement in quality factor. As shown in Figure 6c,d, at α = 0.9, the Q-factor value reaches 1.7 × 107 at θ = 3°.
The momentum-space eigen polarization map of Mode A with shape parameter α = 0,0.6 is shown in Figure 7. At α = 0, a topological charge with υ = +1 is located at the Γ-point position in momentum space, with six symmetric circularly polarized states of υ = −1/2 around it, including three right-handed circular polarizations and three left-handed circular polarizations. The BIC with topological charge υ = +1 is the symmetric protected BIC, which originates from the C3 symmetry of the structure. As the shape of the holes progressively transforms into a hexagonal configuration, the circular polarization state in the polarization diagram gradually converges towards the Γ-point. According to a previous study [12], the inclination of pores will cause the overall polarization pattern to move in an inclined direction. Consequently, within the polarization diagram, the circular polarization state that is in proximity to the Γ-point corresponds to a reduced tilt angle and an elevated Q-factor. This correlation indicates that the closer the polarization state is to the Γ-point, the more efficiently the structure supports high Q resonances, which is associated with a lower tilt angle requirement for achieving circular polarization. When the holes transition to a fully hexagonal shape, the symmetry of the structure evolves from C3 to C6, indicating a higher order of rotational symmetry. Due to charge conservation, a topological charge of υ = +1 and six topological charges of υ = −1/2 are combined into a topological charge of υ = −2. During the process of topological charge merging, the Q-factor in the vicinity of the Γ-point experiences a significant enhancement, as depicted in Figure 5a. In contrast to other structures that rely on inclined holes to achieve circularly polarized light, our design leverages symmetry-protected BICs and the process of topological charge merging. This innovative approach not only facilitates the generation of circular polarization but also significantly enhances the Q-factor.

4. Conclusions

We proposed a novel PC structure capable of directly emitting circularly polarized beams. Our investigation has focused on optimizing the height and tilt angle of the triangular holes within the PC layer to achieve this polarization state. Furthermore, we have demonstrated the capability to attain high Q-factors by modifying the shape of these holes, thereby enhancing the resonance properties of the structure. Given the prerequisite of circularly polarized light emission, our study demonstrates that the quality factor (Q-factor) can be finely tuned within a range of 6.0 × 103 to 1.7 × 107 by strategically altering the shape of the holes. This tunability underscores the versatility of our photonic crystal structure in tailoring the resonance characteristics to meet specific optical requirements. Our research enables the selection of appropriate Q-factors tailored to specific applications, thereby achieving sufficient laser intensity and a reduced laser threshold. We have conducted a thorough analysis of the electric field distribution to elucidate the impact of hole shape on the optical properties of the structure. Recent advancements have indicated that the proposed PC structure is amenable to fabrication through the etching of tilted PC layers, as referenced in [12]. We anticipate that our contributions will significantly enhance the performance of circularly polarized lasers, thereby expanding their utility across a range of laser applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.X.; methodology, C.X., M.C. and G.S.; software, C.X., Q.L., W.Z., B.J. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.X.; formal analysis, M.C. and L.Z.; data curation, M.C. and L.Z.; investigation, Q.L., B.C. and J.L.; funding acquisition, G.S. and Z.L.; writing—Review and editing, G.S. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by The Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant NO. XDB43010000) and National Key R&D program of China (2023YFB2804700).

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Calculation of Stokes Parameters Using the Finite Element Method of COMSOL

By calculating the electric field size Ex(x,y) and Ey(x,y) of the output beam at z = 2500 nm, the complex radiation field rx, and ry above the PC can be determined by:
r x = 1 S S E x ( x , y ) e i ( k x x + k y y ) d x d y
r y = 1 S S E y ( x , y ) e i ( k x x + k y y ) d x d y
where rx and ry are the complex radiation fields above the PC surface, kx and ky are the wave vectors, S is the area of a lattice unit, and z = 0 is defined in the upper layer of the PC layer. The Stokes parameter can be expressed [27] as:
S 0 = | r x | 2 + | r y | 2
S 1 = | r x | 2 | r y | 2
S 2 = 2 | r x | | r y | cos ( Δ φ )
S 3 = 2 | r x | | r y | sin ( Δ φ )
where Δφ is the phase difference of radiation between Ex and Ey, which is calculated from the complex radiation field.

References

  1. Bărar, A.; Maclean, S.A.; Gross, B.M.; Mănăilă-Maximean, D.; Dănilă, O. Mixing Rules for Left-Handed Disordered Metamaterials: Effective-Medium and Dispersion Properties. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Danila, O.; Gross, B.M. Towards Highly Efficient Nitrogen Dioxide Gas Sensors in Humid and Wet Environments Using Triggerable-Polymer Metasurfaces. Polymers 2023, 15, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dănilă, O.; Mănăilă-Maximean, D.; Bărar, A.; Loiko, V.A. Non-Layered Gold-Silicon and All-Silicon Frequency-Selective Metasurfaces for Potential Mid-Infrared Sensing Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kurosaka, Y.; Hirose, K.; Sugiyama, T.; Takiguchi, Y.; Nomoto, Y. Phase-modulating lasers toward on-chip integration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, J.; Fan, F.; Chang, S. Recent Progress on Graphene-Functionalized Metasurfaces for Tunable Phase and Polarization Control. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kurosaka, Y.; Iwahashi, S.; Liang, Y.; Sakai, K.; Miyai, E.; Kunishi, W.; Ohnishi, D.; Noda, S. On-chip beam-steering photonic-crystal lasers. Nat. Photon- 2010, 4, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lv, S.; Bai, Y.; Luo, W.; Meng, F.; Wang, R. Design of a vortex metalens with high focusing efficiency using propagation phase. Appl. Opt. 2022, 61, 6311–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kitamura, K.; Sakai, K.; Takayama, N.; Nishimoto, M.; Noda, S. Focusing properties of vector vortex beams emitted by photonic-crystal lasers. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 2421–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, Y.; Fan, X.; Huang, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, P.; Zhao, J. Dielectric Metalens for Superoscillatory Focusing Based on High-Order Angular Bessel Function. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Noda, S.; Yokoyama, M.; Imada, M.; Chutinan, A.; Mochizuki, M. Polarization mode control of two-dimensional photonic crystal laser by unit cell structure design. Science 2001, 293, 1123–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nishimoto, M.; Maekawa, K.; Noda, S. Design of photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers with circularly-polarized beam. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 6104–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, Y.; Deng, H.; Sha, X.; Chen, W.; Wang, R.; Chen, Y.-H.; Wu, D.; Chu, J.; Kivshar, Y.S.; Xiao, S.; et al. Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum. Nature 2023, 613, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Kivshar, Y.; Song, Q. Chiral emission from resonant metasurfaces. Science 2022, 377, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Iwahashi, S.; Kurosaka, Y.; Sakai, K.; Kitamura, K.; Takayama, N.; Noda, S. Higher-order vector beams produced by photonic-crystal lasers. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 11963–11968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Q.S.; Cheng, B.; Chao, M.H.; Zhang, W.J.; Xu, Y.; Song, G.F. Giant Nonlinear Circular Dichroism from High Q-Factor Asymmetric Lithium Niobate Metasurfaces. Ann. Phys. 2021, 533, 2100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Q.S.; Chao, M.H.; Zhang, W.J.; Song, G.F. Dual-Band Chiral Nonlinear Metasurface Supported by Quasibound States in the Continuum. Ann. Phys. 2022, 534, 2200263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miyai, E.; Sakai, K.; Okano, T.; Kunishi, W.; Ohnishi, D.; Noda, S. Photonics: Lasers producing tailored beams. Nature 2006, 441, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, C.; Pu, T.; Huang, J.; Fan, M.; Huang, L. Manipulating Optical Scattering of Quasi-BIC in Dielectric Metasurface with Off-Center Hole. Nanomaterials 2021, 12, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, M.; Mao, L.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, M.; Xu, H.; Chan, C.T. Merging bound states in the continuum by harnessing higher-order topological charges. Light. Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hwang, M.-S.; Lee, H.-C.; Kim, K.-H.; Jeong, K.-Y.; Kwon, S.-H.; Koshelev, K.; Kivshar, Y.; Park, H.-G. Ultralow-threshold laser using super-bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoda, T.; Notomi, M. Generation and Annihilation of Topologically Protected Bound States in the Continuum and Circularly Polarized States by Symmetry Breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 053902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wan, S.; Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Guan, C.; Li, W.; Liu, J.; Bogdanov, A.; Belov, P.A.; Shi, J. Topologically enabled ultrahigh-Q chiroptical resonances by merging bound states in the continuum. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 3291–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, W.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Guan, F.; Liu, X.; Shi, L.; Zi, J. Circularly Polarized States Spawning from Bound States in the Continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 116104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kang, M.; Liu, T.; Chan, C.T.; Xiao, M. Applications of bound states in the continuum in photonics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2023, 5, 659–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Azzam, S.I.; Kildishev, A.V. Photonic Bound States in the Continuum: From Basics to Applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 9, 2001469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kurosaka, Y.; Sakai, K.; Miyai, E.; Noda, S. Controlling vertical optical confinement in two-dimensional surface-emitting photonic-crystal lasers by shape of air holes. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 18485–18494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, P.C.; Sokhoyan, R.; Shirmanesh, G.K.; Cheng, W.H.; Atwater, H.A. Near-Infrared Active Metasurface for Dynamic Polarization Conversion. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Proposed metasurface with tilted holes for generation of circularly polarized beam. (b) The calculated photonic-band structure of the metasurface with triangular holes and electric field/E/distribution inside a unit cell at the top (upper panel) of the structure with a vertical/tilt hole. The thickness of the structure is 300 nm, and electric field distribution is obtained from eigenmode analysis.
Figure 1. (a) Proposed metasurface with tilted holes for generation of circularly polarized beam. (b) The calculated photonic-band structure of the metasurface with triangular holes and electric field/E/distribution inside a unit cell at the top (upper panel) of the structure with a vertical/tilt hole. The thickness of the structure is 300 nm, and electric field distribution is obtained from eigenmode analysis.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g001
Figure 2. The relationship between the Q-factor and the tilt angle θ. The red dashed line is fitted to demonstrate the inverse quadratic dependence of θ. The thickness of the structure is set to 300 nm.
Figure 2. The relationship between the Q-factor and the tilt angle θ. The red dashed line is fitted to demonstrate the inverse quadratic dependence of θ. The thickness of the structure is set to 300 nm.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g002
Figure 3. (a) Phase differences between Ex and Ey vs. tilt angle θ. (b) Normalized rx and ry vs. tilt angle θ. rx and ry refer to the radiation in x and y directions, respectively. (c) rx/ry vs. tilt angle θ. (d) Stokes parameter S3/S0, vs. tilt angle θ at the layer thicknesses of 240 nm, 270 nm, 300 nm, 330 nm, and 360 nm.
Figure 3. (a) Phase differences between Ex and Ey vs. tilt angle θ. (b) Normalized rx and ry vs. tilt angle θ. rx and ry refer to the radiation in x and y directions, respectively. (c) rx/ry vs. tilt angle θ. (d) Stokes parameter S3/S0, vs. tilt angle θ at the layer thicknesses of 240 nm, 270 nm, 300 nm, 330 nm, and 360 nm.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g003aNanomaterials 14 01405 g003b
Figure 4. Definition of the parameter α and the designed shape of the holes.
Figure 4. Definition of the parameter α and the designed shape of the holes.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g004
Figure 5. (a) The relationship between the Q-factor and the tilt angle θ at α = 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (b) Stokes parameter S3/S0, vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9.
Figure 5. (a) The relationship between the Q-factor and the tilt angle θ at α = 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (b) Stokes parameter S3/S0, vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g005
Figure 6. (a) Electric distribution field of Ex and Ey inside a unit cell at the top (upper panel) of the structure with different holes. (b) Normalized radiation of rx and ry vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (c) rx/ry vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (d) The quality factor of circular polarization vs. shape parameter α.
Figure 6. (a) Electric distribution field of Ex and Ey inside a unit cell at the top (upper panel) of the structure with different holes. (b) Normalized radiation of rx and ry vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (c) rx/ry vs. tilt angle θ at shape parameter of 0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9. (d) The quality factor of circular polarization vs. shape parameter α.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g006aNanomaterials 14 01405 g006b
Figure 7. The momentum-space eigenpolarization map of Mode A for different α and θ. The red and blue dots represent right-handed and left-handed circularly polarized light with a topological charge of −1/2, respectively. The black dots represent the BIC with a topological charge of +1.
Figure 7. The momentum-space eigenpolarization map of Mode A for different α and θ. The red and blue dots represent right-handed and left-handed circularly polarized light with a topological charge of −1/2, respectively. The black dots represent the BIC with a topological charge of +1.
Nanomaterials 14 01405 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, C.; Chao, M.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Zhuang, L.; Cheng, B.; Jiang, B.; Liu, J.; Song, G. Tailoring of Circularly Polarized Beams Employing Bound States in the Continuum in a Designed Photonic Crystal Metasurface Nanostructure. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171405

AMA Style

Xu C, Chao M, Liu Z, Liu Q, Zhang W, Zhuang L, Cheng B, Jiang B, Liu J, Song G. Tailoring of Circularly Polarized Beams Employing Bound States in the Continuum in a Designed Photonic Crystal Metasurface Nanostructure. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(17):1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Chunhao, Minghao Chao, Zhizhong Liu, Qingsong Liu, Wenjing Zhang, Lingyun Zhuang, Bo Cheng, Botao Jiang, Jietao Liu, and Guofeng Song. 2024. "Tailoring of Circularly Polarized Beams Employing Bound States in the Continuum in a Designed Photonic Crystal Metasurface Nanostructure" Nanomaterials 14, no. 17: 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14171405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop