Next Article in Journal
Electrochemical Detection of H2O2 Using Bi2O3/Bi2O2Se Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Synergic Effect of N and Se Facilitates Photoelectric Performance in Co-Hyperdoped Silicon
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metal-Cation-Induced Tiny Ripple on Graphene

by
Yingying Huang
1,*,
Hanlin Li
1,
Liuyuan Zhu
1,
Yongshun Song
1,* and
Haiping Fang
1,2
1
School of Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
2
School of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(19), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191593
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 28 September 2024 / Accepted: 30 September 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Synthesis, Interfaces and Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Ripples on graphene play a crucial role in manipulating its physical and chemical properties. However, producing ripples, especially at the nanoscale, remains challenging with current experimental methods. In this study, we report that tiny ripples in graphene can be generated by the adsorption of a single metal cation (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+) onto a graphene sheet, based on the density functional theory calculations. We attribute this to the cation–π interaction between the metal cation and the aromatic rings on the graphene surface, which makes the carbon atoms closer to metal ions, causing deformation of the graphene sheet, especially in the out-of-plane direction, thereby creating ripples. The equivalent pressures applied to graphene sheets in out-of-plane direction, generated by metal cation–π interactions, reach magnitudes on the order of gigapascals (GPa). More importantly, the electronic and mechanical properties of graphene sheets are modified by the adsorption of various metal cations, resulting in opened bandgaps and enhanced rigidity characterized by a higher elastic modulus. These findings show great potential for applications for producing ripples at the nanoscale in graphene through the regulation of metal cation adsorption.

1. Introduction

Graphene, as a two-dimensional material, possesses superior characteristics, including the highest room-temperature carrier mobility and high mechanical strength [1,2]. Due to its flexibility, graphene exhibits no resistance to out-of-plane deformations [3,4]. Lattice deformations induced by surface corrugation, such as ripples, can significantly modify the physical properties and chemical reactivity of graphene [5,6], including hydrogen splitting [7], strong Raman enhancement [8], pseudomagnetic fields [9,10], bandgap opening [11,12,13,14,15,16], carrier scattering [17,18], and electron–hole puddles [19,20,21]. Therefore, controlling graphene ripples becomes a powerful method for tuning the physical properties and chemical reactivity of this ultimate thin film [7,8,9,12,16,22,23,24,25].
Corrugation in graphene can be formed using various methods, such as spontaneous dynamic ripples of single graphene [26,27], defect-induced and doping methods [28,29], the growing of graphene on metal substrates [30], and graphene transfer processes [31,32]. The formation of ripples at the nanoscale or smaller can create a very narrow bandgap in graphene, which is crucial for practical applications in graphene-based nanoelectronics and nanoelectromechanical devices. However, it is difficult to produce ripples smaller than one nanometer using these current methods, and accurately manipulating these ripples to achieve the desired properties remains a big challenge [5,33].
The cation–π interaction, a type of non-covalent interaction formed between cations and π-electron-rich carbon-based structures [34], provides a versatile and reversible approach to modifying physical properties without altering the underlying chemical structures [35]. The adsorption of cations on graphene has been observed in both gas and solvent phases [36,37,38,39]. However, no studies have investigated the effect of cation adsorption on the ripple formation in graphene. By controlling the cation adsorption site, the formation of ripples can be manipulated. Additionally, the type of cation is expected to affect the size of the ripples formed due to variations in the strength of the cation–π interactions.
In this study, by simulating the adsorption behavior of various metal cations, including Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+, on the graphene sheets, we find that tiny ripples in graphene can be induced by the adsorption of metal cations. This ripple formation is attributed to the cation–π interaction between the metal cation and the aromatic rings on the graphene surface, which makes the carbon atoms closer to metal ions, causing deformation of the graphene sheet, especially in the out-of-plane direction, namely ripples. The equivalent pressures applied to graphene sheets, which are induced by cation adsorption, are on the magnitude of GPa. These ripples modify the electronic and mechanical properties of graphene, leading to a non-zero bandgap and enhanced rigidity characterized by a higher Young’s modulus. These findings offer a new perspective for understanding and controlling the properties of graphene by inducing tiny ripples through metal cation adsorption.

2. Methods

The geometry optimizations of various cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe3+) adsorbed on a graphene sheet were performed using density functional theory (DFT) [40,41] calculations, implemented in the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP 5.4.4) [42]. The lattice parameters of the graphene sheet were a = 8.55 Å and b = 7.40 Å. The electron–ion interactions and exchange–correlation functions were described using the projector augmented wave (PAW) method [43] and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional [44], respectively. The electron wavefunction was expanded in a plane-wave basis with a cutoff energy of 1000 eV. Van der Waals corrections were accounted for using the DFT-D3 model proposed by Grimme [45]. The convergence criteria for energy and force were set to 10−4 eV and 10−2 eV Å−1, respectively. The Brillouin zones were sampled using k-point grids with a uniform spacing of 0.25 Å−1. For Cu2+ and Fe3+, which have unpaired electrons, spin polarization calculations were performed. For band structure calculations, the Brillouin zone was sampled using VASPKIT [46]. To reliably calculate the band structure, the hybrid functional HSE06 was applied [47,48]. A vacuum region of over 20 Å was set to eliminate the interactions between layers.
To analyze the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies of Mg2+, Ca2+ and Cu2+, the DFT calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 software package [49]. All geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were conducted at the B3LYP/SDD level of theory [50]. The LUMO equivalent surface was plotted with the Multiwfn program 3.8 (dev) [51].

3. Results and Discussion

To study the adsorption behavior of various metal cations, including Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+, on a graphene sheet, we initially constructed structural models by placing different cations at various sites on a graphene sheet consisting of twenty-four carbon atoms. After full optimization based on DFT calculations, the geometric structures of the various metal cations absorbed on graphene are illustrated in Figure 1a. All the metal cations occupy the hollow sites of the graphene sheet. The z-direction distances (d) between Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ and the graphene sheet are 2.51 Å, 2.97 Å, 2.13 Å, 2.39 Å, 1.98 Å, and 1.68 Å, respectively (Figure 1b). When comparing cations within the same valence state, Na+ is much closer to the graphene surface than K+, and Mg2+ is closer to the graphene surface than Ca2+. This observation aligns with the smaller atomic radii of Na+ and Mg2+ compared to K+ and Ca2+, respectively. Additionally, when comparing metal ions within the same period, Mg2+ exhibits a shorter adsorption distance than Na+, while Ca2+ is closer than K+. This trend can be attributed to the higher charges of Mg2⁺ and Ca2⁺ relative to Na⁺ and K⁺, respectively. Although the atomic radius of Fe3+ is comparable to that of Mg2+, its higher charge results in a shorter adsorption distance. Furthermore, Cu2+ demonstrates a shorter adsorption distance than both Ca2+ and Mg2+, likely due to the oxidative capability of copper ions.
When a metal cation is adsorbed on the graphene surface, the ion adsorption energy (Ei) can be calculated using the following formula:
E i = E i o n @ G E i o n E G
where Eion, EG, and Eion@G are the total energies of the isolated ion, the graphene sheet, and the ion-adsorbed graphene sheet, respectively. As shown in Figure 1c, the ion adsorption energies (Ei) for the systems with adsorption of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ are −51.4, −47.7, −170.9, −142.5, −307.3, and −675.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The magnitude of Ei is consistent with previous results [37]. The order of adsorption energy for these cations exhibits an inverse relationship with the varying trend in d, indicating that a smaller distance between the metal cation and the graphene sheet corresponds to a stronger adsorption effect.
The oxidative property of Cu2+ arises energies (Cu2+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+).
Furthermore, the electron transfer between the metal cation and the graphene sheet was explored. The numbers of electrons transferred from the graphene sheet to the unoccupied valence orbits of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ are 0.053, 0.050, 0.389, 0.359, 1.119, and 1.677 e, respectively (Figure 1d). We found that the adsorption energies of various metal cations on the graphene sheets are directly proportional to the number of electrons transferred from the graphene sheet to the corresponding metal cations. Thus, the metal cations with higher valence states tend to accept more electrons, indicating a stronger coupling interaction between their unoccupied valence orbitals and the graphene.
As shown in Figure 2, in the partial electron density of states (DOS) near the Fermi level of Cu2+@graphene and Fe3+@graphene, the 3D-orbital densities are considerably higher than those of other orbitals, and overlap with the DOS of carbon atoms at some peaks, indicating that the interactions between electrons in the 3d orbitals and carbon atoms help the effective adsorption of transition metal cations on graphene sheets.
The adsorption of a metal cation on a graphene sheet can induce a tiny ripple. To characterize this ripple, we define two parameters: the deformation in the z direction (ΔZ) and the relative area change in the rippled graphene sheet compared to flat graphene (ΔS). These parameters help describe the geometric scale of the ripple produced by metal cation adsorption. The values of ΔZ corresponding to rippled graphene sheets induced by the adsorption of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ are 0.019 Å, 0.006 Å, 0.096 Å, 0.080 Å, 0.079 Å, and 0.053 Å, respectively (Figure 3a). Importantly, the values of ΔS for rippled graphene sheets induced by various metal cations are all less than 1%. Our findings indicate that divalent and tervalent cations tend to produce larger ripples, which can be attributed to the stronger cation–π interactions between the cations and the graphene sheets.
When a cation is adsorbed onto a graphene sheet, the previously flat graphene structure becomes destabilized, as it can no longer maintain its lowest free energy state. The delocalization of cation–π interactions brings the carbon atoms on the graphene closer to the metal ion, causing the graphene sheet to bend. Thus, the deformation, particularly in the out-of-plane direction, namely the ripple, occurs as a direct result of the adsorption.
To quantitatively express the adsorption effect of cations on graphene, we introduce the concept of equivalent pressure P. Using Taylor’s expansion, we can express the energy associated with small z-direction deformations up to the second order as follows:
E z = E 0 + 1 2 β z 2
Here, E 0   and E z represent the total energies of the graphene sheet before and after cation adsorption, respectively. The equivalent force F exerted by the cation on the graphene can then be expressed as
F = d E d z β z
Consequently, the equivalent pressure P is defined as
P = F S = β z S = 2 E z S
where E = E z E ( 0 ) . The area S is considered constant, given the minimal deformation in the x and y directions (ΔS < 0.75%; see Figure S2). The values of E are presented in Figure S3, and the equivalent pressures for different metal cations are shown in Figure 3b. The equivalent pressures for Na+@graphene, K+@graphene, Mg2+@graphene, Ca2+@ graphene, Cu2+@graphene, and Fe3+@graphene are 2.24 GPa, 2.44 GPa, 4.79 GPa, 3.03 GPa, 5.11 GPa, and 8.70 GPa, respectively. Notably, the varying trend in equivalent pressure closely follows the order of adsorption energies of the various metal cations on graphene sheets. Previous studies have applied continuum theory to investigate corrugation in graphene [33,52,53]. When the corrugation is isotropic (i.e., forming ripples), the total energy of the system aligns with Taylor’s expansion, indirectly validating the approach and formulas used in this study to calculate equivalent pressure.
The mechanical properties of rippled graphene sheets with the adsorption of various metal cations show notable changes in their Young’s modulus. The calculated values for Na+@graphene, K+@graphene, Mg2+@graphene, Ca2+@ graphene, Cu2+@graphene, and Fe3+@graphene are 325.53 N/m, 325.83 N/m, 342.15 N/m, 330.84 N/m, 340.86 N/m, and 338.81 N/m, respectively (Table 1). Compared to graphene without metal cation adsorption, the elastic modulus of the rippled graphene increases with the presence of these cations. This enhancement in rigidity suggests that the slight rippling induced by metal cation adsorption improves the overall mechanical properties of graphene.
In flat graphene without metal cation adsorption, the unique electronic structure gives rise to a Dirac cone within the Brillouin zone. At the Γ point, the conduction band and the valence band converge, resulting in a zero bandgap (0 eV). In contrast, based on hybrid functional HSE06, the calculated band gaps for rippled graphene sheets induced by Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ are 0.031 eV, 0.041 eV, 0.020 eV, 0.032 eV, 0.118 eV, and 0.136 eV, respectively (Figure 4b and Figure S3). The adsorption of these metal cations leads to the opening of energy bandgaps in graphene sheets, indicating a transition from conductors with zero bandgap to semiconductors with non-zero bandgaps. This demonstrates that the slight rippling of graphene, induced by weak cation–π interactions, can effectively regulate its energy band structure. Consequently, the change in bandgap can be used to characterize the structural damage of graphene after deformation, as a previous study reported an increase in bandgap when carbon atoms are extracted from a graphene sheet in the z-direction [15].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the tiny out-of-plane ripples on graphene sheet induced by various metal cations have been achieved by adsorbing various metal cations such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ based on DFT simulations. The formation of the ripple is primarily attributed to the cation–π interactions between the metal cations and graphene, which brings the carbon atoms closer to metal ions, inducing deformation of the graphene sheet, referred to as the ripple. The equivalent pressures exerted on graphene sheets in the out-of-plane direction, generated by these cation–π interactions, reach the magnitude of GPa. More importantly, the adsorption of metal cations not only enhances the rigidity of rippled graphene sheets but also opens their bandgaps.
Notably, the tiny ripple on graphene is induced only by a single metal cation. With stronger adsorption from multiple cations, we anticipate that the ripple or deformation of graphene will significantly increase. Therefore, we aim to explore the possibility of obtaining a graphene sheet with a wide bandgap by adsorbing multiple metal cations—this will be a primary focus for our future research. These findings highlight the significant potential to regulate nanoscale ripples in graphene by controlling the cation adsorption, leveraging the weak non-covalent cation–π interactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14191593/s1, Figure S1. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies of Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺ ions, indicated by cyan horizontal lines. The insets display the spatial charge distributions of the LUMO orbitals at an isosurface value of 0.5. Figure S2. In-plane deformation (ΔS) of the ripple in graphene induced by various metal cations. Figure S3. Energy difference (ΔE) between rippled graphene with the adsorption of various metal cations and flat graphene without cation adsorption. Figure S4. (a–f) Band structures and density of states (DOS) for rippled graphene sheets induced by Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+, respectively. Eg represents the bandgap. Figure S5. Structure configuration of Zn2+ adsorbed on a graphene sheet.

Author Contributions

Y.H., Y.S. and H.F. designed the work. Y.H., H.L., L.Z. and Y.S. performed computational simulations and analysis. Y.H. and H.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12004109), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China (23JC1401400), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of East China University of Science.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Dubonos, S.V.; Firsov, A.A. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, D.B.; Akatyeva, E.; Dumitrică, T. Bending ultrathin graphene at the margins of continuum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 255503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tapasztó, L.; Dumitrică, T.; Kim, S.J.; Nemes-Incze, P.; Hwang, C.; Biró, L.P. Breakdown of continuum mechanics for nanometre-wavelength rippling of graphene. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deng, S.; Berry, V. Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: An overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications. Mater. Today 2016, 19, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ling, F.; Liao, R.; Yuan, C.; Shi, X.; Li, L.; Zhou, X.; Tang, X.; Jing, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, S. Geometric, electronic and transport properties of bulged graphene: A theoretical study. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158, 084702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, P.Z.; Xiong, W.Q.; Bera, A.; Timokhin, I.; Wu, Z.F.; Mishchenko, A.; Sellers, M.C.; Liu, B.L.; Cheng, H.M.; Janzen, E.; et al. Unexpected catalytic activity of nanorippled graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2300481120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dobrik, G.; Nemes-Incze, P.; Majerus, B.; Sule, P.; Vancso, P.; Piszter, G.; Menyhard, M.; Kalas, B.; Petrik, P.; Henrard, L.; et al. Large-area nanoengineering of graphene corrugations for visible-frequency graphene plasmons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yildiz, G.; Bolton-Warberg, M.; Awaja, F. Graphene and graphene oxide for bio-sensing: General properties and the effects of graphene ripples. Acta Biomater. 2021, 131, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kun, P.; Kukucska, G.; Dobrik, G.; Koltai, J.; Kürti, J.; Biró, L.P.; Tapasztó, L.; Nemes-Incze, P. Large intravalley scattering due to pseudo-magnetic fields in crumpled graphene. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2019, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, C.-E.; Lee, J.; Walsh, A.; Lordi, V.; Bahr, D.F. Role of ripples in altering the electronic and chemical properties of graphene. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 054708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lee, J.K.; Yamazaki, S.; Yun, H.; Park, J.; Kennedy, G.P.; Kim, G.T.; Pietzsch, O.; Wiesendanger, R.; Lee, S.; Hong, S.; et al. Modification of electrical properties of graphene by substrate-induced nanomodulation. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3494–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pereira, V.M.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Liang, H.Y.; Mahadevan, L. Geometry, mechanics, and electronics of singular structures and wrinkles in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 156603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yan, W.; He, W.Y.; Chu, Z.D.; Liu, M.; Meng, L.; Dou, R.F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Nie, J.C.; He, L. Strain and curvature induced evolution of electronic band structures in twisted graphene bilayer. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gui, G.; Zhong, J.; Ma, Z. Electronic properties of rippled graphene. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 402, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guinea, F.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Geim, A.K. Energy gaps and a zero-field quantum Hall effect in graphene by strain engineering. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, W.; Low, T.; Perebeinos, V.; Bol, A.A.; Zhu, Y.; Yan, H.; Tersoff, J.; Avouris, P. Structure and electronic transport in graphene wrinkles. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3431–3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Katsnelson, M.I.; Geim, A.K. Electron scattering on microscopic corrugations in graphene. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2008, 366, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Partovi-Azar, P.; Nafari, N.; Tabar, M.R.R. Interplay between geometrical structure and electronic properties in rippled free-standing graphene. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 165434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martin, J.; Akerman, N.; Ulbricht, G.; Lohmann, T.; Smet, J.H.; von Klitzing, K.; Yacoby, A. Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, X.; Pereira, L.F.C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, X.; Bae, S.; Tinh Bui, C.; Xie, R.; Thong, J.T.L.; et al. Length-dependent thermal conductivity in suspended single-layer graphene. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Kitipornchai, S. Improving interfacial shear strength between graphene sheets by strain-induced wrinkles. Carbon 2020, 168, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Levy, N.; Burke, S.A.; Meaker, K.L.; Panlasigui, M.; Zettl, A.; Guinea, F.; Castro Neto, A.H.; Crommie, M.F. Strain-induced pseudo-magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in graphene nanobubbles. Science 2010, 329, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bao, W.; Miao, F.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Jang, W.; Dames, C.; Lau, C.N. Controlled ripple texturing of suspended graphene and ultrathin graphite membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, S. Effect of intrinsic ripples on elasticity of the graphene monolayer. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meyer, J.C.; Geim, A.K.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Novoselov, K.S.; Booth, T.J.; Roth, S. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature 2007, 446, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, J.; Vanacore, G.M.; Cepellotti, A.; Marzari, N.; Zewail, A.H. Rippling ultrafast dynamics of suspended 2D monolayers, graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6555–E6561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fasolino, A.; Los, J.H.; Katsnelson, M.I. Intrinsic ripples in graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 858–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martinez-Asencio, J.; Ruestes, C.J.; Bringa, E.M.; Caturla, M.J. Controlled rippling of graphene via irradiation and applied strain modify its mechanical properties: A nanoindentation simulation study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13897–13903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Obraztsov, A.N.; Obraztsova, E.A.; Tyurnina, A.V.; Zolotukhin, A.A. Chemical vapor deposition of thin graphite films of nanometer thickness. Carbon 2007, 45, 2017–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rhee, D.; Paci, J.T.; Deng, S.; Lee, W.-K.; Schatz, G.C.; Odom, T.W. Soft Skin layers enable area-specific, multiscale graphene wrinkles with switchable orientations. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Koenig, S.P.; Boddeti, N.G.; Dunn, M.L.; Bunch, J.S. Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bai, K.K.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, H.; Meng, L.; Peng, H.; Liu, Z.; Nie, J.C.; He, L. Creating one-dimensional nanoscale periodic ripples in a continuous mosaic graphene monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 086102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sunner, J.; Nishizawa, K.; Kebarle, P. Ion-solvent molecule interactions in the gas phase. The potassium ion and benzene. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Georgakilas, V.; Otyepka, M.; Bourlinos, A.B.; Chandra, V.; Kim, N.; Kemp, K.C.; Hobza, P.; Zboril, R.; Kim, K.S. Functionalization of graphene: Covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6156–6214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, J.; Camilli, L.; Caridad, J.M.; Santos, J.E.; Liu, Y. Spontaneous adsorption of ions on graphene at the electrolyte–graphene interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 203102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shi, G.; Liu, J.; Wang, C.; Song, B.; Tu, Y.; Hu, J.; Fang, H. Ion enrichment on the hydrophobic carbon-based surface in aqueous salt solutions due to cation-π interactions. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, L.; Guo, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, X. Multiscale simulation of the interaction and adsorption of ions on a hydrophobic graphene surface. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2018, 19, 2954–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Williams, C.D.; Dix, J.; Troisi, A.; Carbone, P. Effective polarization in pairwise potentials at the graphene-electrolyte interface. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hafner, J. Materials simulations using VASP—A quantum perspective to materials science. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2007, 177, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hafner, J. Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 2044–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, V.; Xu, N.; Liu, J.-C.; Tang, G.; Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021, 267, 108033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paier, J.; Marsman, M.; Hummer, K.; Kresse, G.; Gerber, I.C.; Ángyán, J.G. Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 154709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vydrov, O.A.; Heyd, J.; Krukau, A.V.; Scuseria, G.E. Importance of short-range versus long-range Hartree-Fock exchange for the performance of hybrid density functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 074106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  50. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meng, L.; Su, Y.; Geng, D.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Dou, R.-F.; Nie, J.-C.; He, L. Hierarchy of graphene wrinkles induced by thermal strain engineering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 251610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cerda, E.; Mahadevan, L. Geometry and physics of wrinkling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 90, 074302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Structural configuration of a metal cation adsorbed on a graphene sheet. Mn+ denotes the metal cation, including Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+. (b) Distances between various metal cations and the corresponding graphene sheets. (c) Adsorption energies of the various metal cations on the graphene sheet. (d) Number of electrons transferred from the graphene sheet to the metal cations.
Figure 1. (a) Structural configuration of a metal cation adsorbed on a graphene sheet. Mn+ denotes the metal cation, including Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+. (b) Distances between various metal cations and the corresponding graphene sheets. (c) Adsorption energies of the various metal cations on the graphene sheet. (d) Number of electrons transferred from the graphene sheet to the metal cations.
Nanomaterials 14 01593 g001
Figure 2. Partial electron density of states near the Fermi level of (a) Cu2+@graphene and (b) Fe3+@graphene.
Figure 2. Partial electron density of states near the Fermi level of (a) Cu2+@graphene and (b) Fe3+@graphene.
Nanomaterials 14 01593 g002
Figure 3. (a) Out-of-plane deformation (ΔZ) of rippled graphene induced by the adsorption of various metal cations. (b) Equivalent pressure (P) exerted by the metal cation on the graphene sheet.
Figure 3. (a) Out-of-plane deformation (ΔZ) of rippled graphene induced by the adsorption of various metal cations. (b) Equivalent pressure (P) exerted by the metal cation on the graphene sheet.
Nanomaterials 14 01593 g003
Figure 4. (a) Band structure and density of states (DOS) for Fe3+ adsorbed on the graphene sheet. Eg represents the band gap. (b) Band gaps of rippled graphene sheets induced by various metal cations.
Figure 4. (a) Band structure and density of states (DOS) for Fe3+ adsorbed on the graphene sheet. Eg represents the band gap. (b) Band gaps of rippled graphene sheets induced by various metal cations.
Nanomaterials 14 01593 g004
Table 1. Elastic tensors and Young’s modulus of 2D rippled graphene sheets with adsorption of various cations.
Table 1. Elastic tensors and Young’s modulus of 2D rippled graphene sheets with adsorption of various cations.
SystemC11 (N/m)C12 (N/m)C22 (N/m)C33 (N/m)Young’s Modulus (N/m)
Graphene325.7478.16347.47138.87325.39
Na+@graphene326.0976.88347.11138.92325.53
K+@graphene326.4177.29347.61138.98325.83
Mg2+@graphene342.7364.06357.12148.78342.15
Ca2+@graphene333.9472.99350.89140.35330.84
Cu2+@graphene344.9760.50362.21143.20340.86
Fe3+@graphene350.0868.56352.71142.53338.81
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhu, L.; Song, Y.; Fang, H. Metal-Cation-Induced Tiny Ripple on Graphene. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191593

AMA Style

Huang Y, Li H, Zhu L, Song Y, Fang H. Metal-Cation-Induced Tiny Ripple on Graphene. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(19):1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191593

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yingying, Hanlin Li, Liuyuan Zhu, Yongshun Song, and Haiping Fang. 2024. "Metal-Cation-Induced Tiny Ripple on Graphene" Nanomaterials 14, no. 19: 1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14191593

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop