Next Article in Journal
Magnetic Nanoparticles Interact and Pass an In Vitro Co-Culture Blood-Placenta Barrier Model
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Graphite Oxide with Different Surface Oxygen Contents Assisted Microwave Radiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210039, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2018, 8(2), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020107
Submission received: 7 January 2018 / Revised: 8 February 2018 / Accepted: 12 February 2018 / Published: 13 February 2018

Abstract

:
Prion protein (PrPSc) has drawn widespread attention due to its pathological potential to prion diseases. In this work, we constructed a novel surface plasmon resonance (SPR) detection assay involving magnetic microspheres (MMs) and its controlled release property, for selective capture, embedding, concentration, and SPR detection of PrPSc with high sensitivity and specificity. Aptamer-modified magnetic particles (AMNPs) were used to specifically capture PrPSc. Amphiphilic copolymer was used to embed the labeled PrPSc and form magnetic microspheres to isolate PrPSc from the external environment. Static magnetic and alternating magnetic fields were used to concentrate and control release the embedded PrPSc, respectively. Finally, the released AMNPs-labeled PrPSc was detected by SPR which was equipped with a bare gold sensing film. A good linear relationship was obtained between SPR responses and the logarithm of PrPSc concentrations over a range of 0.01–1000 ng/mL. The detection sensitivity for PrPSc was improved by 10 fold compared with SPR direct detection format. The specificity of the present biosensor was also determined by PrPC and other reagents as controls. This proposed approach could also be used to isolate and detect other highly pathogenic biomolecules with similar structural characteristics by altering the corresponding aptamer in the AMNPs conjugates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Prion protein (PrPSc) has drawn widespread attention due to its pathological potential to prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt Jakob syndrome and BSE [1]. PrPSc has strong resistance to heating, ultraviolet radiation, radiation and many chemical disinfectants, and general disinfection, freezing, drying and other similar procedures cannot make it lose toxicity [2]. In the meantime, during the long incubation period of the prion diseases (2 to 30 years), the virulent β-sheet rich PrPSc can introduce the transformation of the normal cellular PrPC into PrPSc [3,4]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a detection method of PrPSc for early diagnosis, which should be safe, sensitive and specific.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor technology is a commercialized approach with a higher precision and sensitivity compared with traditional immunosorbent assays [5,6]. More and more researches have introduced SPR as a potential powerful tool for the detection of PrPSc and PrPC [7,8,9]. However, it is reported that the minimum lethal dose of PrPSc in hamsters is less than 2 nM; the current sensitivity is not high enough for early diagnosis of prion disease [10]. In addition, due to the low molecular weight (23 kDa) and the trace amount of PrPSc mixed with the large volume of circulating blood, it is highly important for the creation of a novel SPR-based detection assay for the PrPSc detection with ultra-sensitivity and high-specificity. Recently, several approaches involving nanotechnology have been reported to enhance the SPR signals constructing a “sandwich” detection system [11,12].
There are still three challenges to overcome to realize the combination of SPR technology and nano-probe technology for the detection of PrPSc: first, the designed biological nano-probe should have a highly specific property for the identification of PrPSc in the complex bio-samples, such as tissue, blood and organs; secondly, PrPSc should be isolated in the sample treatment procedures and released in the detection procedures, to avoid “second infection” and the possible effects of other substances (such as PrPC) coexisting in the samples on the detection results; finally, the structural characteristics of PrPSc should be fully utilized in the novel SPR systems to optimize the construction procedures of sensing film, reducing the detection costs and preventing the inevitable effects on the SPR detection results from the nonspecific interactions at the bio-nano interfaces [13].
In this work, we constructed a novel SPR detection assay involving magnetic microsphere and its controlled release property, for selective capture, embedding, concentration, and SPR detection of PrPSc in the samples. Aptamer-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles (AMNPs) synthesized through a silanization reaction and a glutaraldehyde (GA) crosslinking interaction (Figure 1A), are supposed to specifically capture the free PrPSc molecules in the sample (Figure 1C). Then, amphiphilic polymer (Poly(HFMA-g-PEGMA)) was synthesized through free radical reaction (Figure 1B) for the formation of magnetic microspheres (MMs) which were used to selectively embed the AMNPs labeled PrPSc. The obtained MMs could be separated from the sample and enriched by a static magnetic field. By doing this, our purpose is to use MMs as a holder for the recognized free PrPSc molecules which are captured by AMNPs, to isolate them from the complex bio-environment, and to avoid “second infection” and the possible effects of other substances coexisting in the samples on the detection results. Our previous research confirmed that PrPSc molecules could self-assemble on gold surface via a coupling reaction between the disulfide bond and gold atoms [14,15]. Here the embedded PrPSc could be released under an alternating magnetic field just prior to the detection procedure and directly detected by SPR which is equipped with a bare gold film. This proposed approach could also be used to isolate and detect other highly pathogenic biomolecules with similar structural characteristics by altering the corresponding aptamer in the AMNPs conjugates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Prion protein was purchased from Calbiochem® in Darmstadt, Germany (sequence: aa 23-231) and used as our previous work [14]. Terminal amino functioned SAF-93 [16] with 20 thymine bases as the spacer, which has been proven to have more than 10-fold higher affinity for PrPSc than for PrPC, were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology Co. in Shanghai, China. ThioPEG were purchased from Prochimia Surfaces in Gdansk, Poland. Cys-protein G (Catalog #: 1002-04) was obtained from Shanghai PrimeGene Bio-Tech Co. in Shanghai, China. Newborn Calf Serum (NBCS) was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) (Catalog #:1610159). Other chemical reagents are supplied by Sigma with analytical purity. Human serum was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Synthesis of AMNPs

APTES-Fe3O4 nanoparticles were firstly prepared according to the procedure described by previous reports (Figure 1A) [17,18]. Then the obtained APTES-Fe3O4 NPs (100 μL, 50 mg/mL) were redisposed in PBS (900 μL, 100 mM, pH 8.0) containing 0.2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde by ultrasonic dispersion for 20 min in room temperature followed by the addition of SAF-93 (100 μL, 40 μM). The glutaraldehyde crosslinking interaction was as in Figure 1A, under two-hour incubation with shaking (150 rpm) in room temperature. To remove the unmodified SAF-93 and excessive glutaraldehyde, the conjugates were collected by magnetic separation and washed by 100 mM PBS thrice. After that, the conjugates were further ultrafiltrated in a Nanosep 3K Omega filter device (filter size: 30 kDa).

2.3. PrPSc Labeling, Embedding, Enrichment and Release

The amphiphilic poly (HFMA-g-PEGMA) copolymers were firstly synthesized by free radical polymerization which is already published previously (Figure 1B, [19]). Then the capture and embedding processes of PrPSc are shown in Figure 1C. Briefly, 50 uL AMNPs solution (5 ng/mL) was firstly mixed with the samples (1 mL, in PBS buffer or NBCS) containing PrPSc in varied concentrations with other hybrid molecules (such as PrPC). Then the mixtures were incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. After the reaction, poly (HFMA-g-PEGMA) was added, and the mixtures were incubated in a water bath at 70 °C for 20 min under N2 protection. Finally, the synthesized MMs embedding the AMNPs labeled PrPSc were separated and concentrated in the presence of a static magnetic field. The purified samples were labeled as Sample B while the samples without any treatment were labeled as Sample A.
Then, the enriched MMs were re-dispersed in 1 mL PBS and incubated in an alternating magnetic field provided by an induction heating equipment (SPG-06-II, Shenzhen Shuangping Power Supply Technology Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, China), frequency: 382 kHz, current intensity: 15 A). Because of magnetocaloric effect, the local temperature of MMs increased resulting in the damage of their structures and the release of PrPSc. The concentrated AMNPs-PrPSc solution was labeled as Sample D.

2.4. Determination of the Induction Heating Time

During the incubation of MMs in the alternating magnetic field, a certain amount of the sample was taken every 5 min and treated by suction filtration using a permeable membrane with 30 nm pore size. The amount of iron in the filtrate was measured by the phenanthroline spectrophotometric method. Because the iron element present in the filtrate was derived from the AMNPs along with the released PrPSc, its amount reflected the release situation of PrPSc.

2.5. In Situ SPR Measurement

The biosensor system used here is BI-2000 (Biosensing Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA). Prior to the detection, the bare gold film was immersed into the anhydrous acetone overnight to eliminate the possible contaminations. After repeatedly washing with water and drying with N2, the chip was annealed in a hydrogen flam. Then the sensing film was mounted on a SPR prism with the matching oil. Before the injection of the samples, the chip was rinsed with PBS and a stable baseline was obtained. Then the released AMNPs-labeled PrPSc in PBS was directly injected into the SPR cuvette for the detection. All the corresponding SPR signals were obtained in three repeated experiments independently, and the injection rate was set as 15 μL/min.

2.6. Characterization

The morphology of the nanoparticle was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) performed on a FEI Tecnai G2 20 S-TWIN from FEI® in Hillsboro, Oregon, USA. The IR spectra were recorded by FT-IR (FTIR920 from JingHe Analytical Instruments Company in Shanghai China), and each sample together with KBr was pressed to form a tablet. UV-Vis spectroscopy was carried out by a UV-3500 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kotyo, Japan). Magnetic measurements were carried out using a Lake Shore 7407 VSM (East Changing Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China).
AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to investigate the morphologies of the obtained AMNPs, MMs and the biosensing substrates before and after detection. An Agilent 5500 Controller combined with a 50 μm by 50 μm Agilent multipurpose AFM scanner was used to obtain high-resolution AFM images. Liquid phase AFM imaging was introduced for the observation of particles and the substrates, to avoid the negative effect of the possible physical agglomeration during the drying process on the morphology evaluation. In detail, 400 μL of each sample (particles) was deposited onto newly-caved mica surface in a liquid cell, and then the samples were imaged immediately at room temperature. For the substrates, they were imaged immediately after detection. Silicon cantilevers tip with spring constant of around 0.1 N/m were used. All the images were taken under TopMAC format with a PicoTREC controller (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The 1024 × 1024 points AFM images were processed by WSxM software [20].

2.7. Safety Considerations

Prion protein is a potential infective pathogen. All the procedures of manipulating the PrP-containing samples should be done carefully and should comply with the American Centers for Disease Control (CDC) requirements for biosafety in microbiological and biomedical experiments. All the samples or solutions should be inactivated before removal from the laboratory by adding a sufficient volume of 8 M guanidinium chloride to the final concentration of 6 M. The mixture should be incubated at room temperature for at least 24 h to ensure that the infective molecules are inactivated. The solution of inactivated prions should be transferred to clean fresh containers and removed from the lab.

2.8. Detection of PrPSc in Real Sample

To demonstrate the potential application of this detection system, we detected PrPSc in human serum by using standard addition method. After mixing 5 ng/mL AMNPs with a series of standard solutions of PrPSc in non-diluted human serum by vigorous shaking. The mixtures were treated by the procedures as mentioned above, followed by in situ SPR measurements, and a calibration curve was constructed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of AMNPs and Magnetic Microspheres

The morphology and structure of the synthesized AMNPs were examined by both TEM and AFM (Figure 2A,B, respectively). It is clearly observed that the size distribution obtained from TEM is 14.53 ± 0.08 nm, which is much smaller than the dimensions of AMNPs observed by AFM (23.29 ± 0.56 nm). This may be attributed to the presence of water molecules held by aptamers surrounding the Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the liquid AFM imaging. The conjugation of SAF-93 to Fe3O4 NPs could also be determined by the UV-Vis spectroscopy in Figure 2C. There is an obvious broad absorption band at around 260 nm in the spectrum of AMNPs, which is in accordance with the characteristic absorption band of RNA [21].
Figure 2D shows the FT-IR spectra of the poly (HFMA-g-PEGMA) copolymers (black), AMNPs (blue) and MMs (red). For AMNPs, the peak at 593.97 cm−1 is owing to Fe-O vibration. The peaks at 917.95, 1090.0 and 1051.5 cm−1 are owing to bending vibration of NH2 group, C-N stretching vibration, and Si-O stretching vibration, respectively. The presence of DNA-related peak at 1550.6 cm−1 and the peak at 1210.5 cm−1 attributes to the stretching vibrations of phosphate which is one of the three major components of RNA, indicating the successful modification of SAF-93 [22]. For the copolymers, the strong absorption peak at 1105 cm−1 is attributed to the CO characteristic stretching adsorption of PEGMA. The characteristic peak of C-F appears at 1342 cm−1 because of the HFMA segment. The peak at 1740 cm−1 can be attributed to the presence of C=O groups in both HFMA and PEGMA. The results indicate the synthesis of the amphiphilic copolymers. The appearance of the adsorption peaks at the similar wavenumbers compared to the FTIR results of both AMNPs and the copolymers, demonstrating the successful formation of MMs.
The amphiphilic poly(HFMA-g-PEGMA) copolymers show a tendency to form a core-shell microsphere in water. The water-soluble PEG chains (the blue segment in Figure 1B) serve as an outer hydrophilic shell stabilizing the microsphere. In addition, because of the hydrophobic characteristic of the HFMA segments and the intra-molecular β-sheets structure in AMNPs-labeled PrPSc, they have a high tendency to bury themselves into the interior of the microspheres, forming a hydrophobic magnetic core. The morphology of the PrPSc-encapsulated MMs is investigated by AFM and TEM in Figure 2E. From the AFM image, we may see that the MMs are stable with a narrow size distribution between 150 nm and 250 nm, and do not aggregate in water. In the TEM images, black clusters consisting of AMNPs and PrPSc are obviously observed.

3.2. Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties

The magnetic properties of the synthesized Fe3O4, AMNPs and MMs were measured by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (Figure 3). As could be seen, the typical characteristics of magnetic behavior are observed. The saturation magnetization values are 65.37, 53.20 and 32.24 emu/g. These results indicate that the magnetic microspheres dispersed in the solution have a rapid response in a static magnetic field, and the orientational enrichment of the imbedded PrPSc can be achieved in a short time.
In a magnetic field produced by an alternating current coil (382 kHz, 15 A), the temperature of the magnetic microsphere varying with time is shown in Figure 4A. The temperature of the PrPSc embedded magnetic microsphere rises quickly at the beginning, and reaches 80 °C within 15 min. The three dimensional infrared thermal images in Figure 4B are consistent with the magnetothermal measurement results. Figure 4C is the ultraviolet absorption spectrum of the iron element, which is released from the magnetic microsphere in the samples at different incubation time in the alternating magnetic field. The corresponding obtained maximum absorption values of the spectrums at 526 nm varying with the incubation time are shown in Figure 4D. From the results, we may see that the amount of the released iron increases rapidly during the period between 5 and 10 min (the yellow part in Figure 4A,D), indicating that the damage of the structures of the magnetic microspheres caused by the magnetetocaloric effect begins at 5 min and nearly 80% of the embedded PrPSc molecules release from the microspheres in the following 5 min. Based on the results, 350 s was chosen as the induction heating time of the magnetic microspheres in the alternating magnetic field for the release of the embedded PrPSc. The corresponding heating temperature is around 65 °C (identified in red in Figure 4A).

3.3. SPR Sensing for the Detection of Released AMNPs Labeled PrPSc

As we discussed above, the PrPSc molecules were captured by AMNPs, embedded in the amphiphilic copolymer, and finally released with the help of alternating magnetic field. The released AMNPs labeled PrPSc were then detected in SPR equipped with bare gold sensing film. In order to test the isolation, enrichment and detection efficiencies of our designed processing and detection system for PrPSc in complex bio-samples, we began with examples of the PrPSc/BSA mixed samples with the same concentration (50 ng/mL). As shown in Figure 5A, the bare gold surface is clean with characteristic gold edges. Figure 5B is the AFM results of the surface morphology of the SPR gold substrate after the detection of mixed PrPSc/BSA sample. From the AFM image, we may see that the gold substrate is obviously modified by molecules yielding parallel linear patterns. From the corresponding cross-section files, we observe that all these molecules are of uniform sizes with the height values at around 1 nm, indicating that these observed molecules are formed by PrP dimers and trimmers as reported by our previous work [15], and BSA has no specific interaction with the sensing film. Figure 5C is the AFM image of the sensing substrate after the injection of the purified sample, which has isolated PrPSc via copolymer embedding and magnetic separation. The substrate is observed to be clean without any modification of PrPSc, indicating that PrPSc are all isolated from the environment by the designed processes in this work. The AFM image of the surface morphology of the SPR sensing substrate after the injection of the released AMNPs-labeled PrPSc, is totally different. As shown in Figure 5D, the obtained sensing film is uneven, with lots of dot-like particles modified on the surface. From the observed morphology and size under AFM, we may confirm that these particles are AMNPs which capture PrPSc and interact with the gold film via the Au-S bonding.
As we know that the SPR signal enhancement is certainly provided by the high refractive index and high molecular weight of the analyte, the state of the analyte captured on the surface of the sensing film and the resulting morphology should affect the detection signal [23]. As shown in Figure 6, the obtained SPR signals are 31.38 RU and 366.22 RU for the untreated and treated PrPSc/BSA samples, respectively, while no SPR signal is obtained for the purified sample. All these results suggest that the designed analysis method here can isolate PrPSc from the complex biosystem with high specificity, and can increase the detection sensitivity (~10 fold). Figure 7A illustrates the variation of the obtained signals for the analysis of PrPSc in different concentrations. A good linear relationship is obtained between SPR responses and the logarithm of PrPSc concentrations over a range of 0.01–1000 ng/mL. The regression equation was y = 88.58x + 217.98 (R2 = 0.9943, x is the logarithm of PrPSc concentration (Log (ng/mL) and y is the SPR signal (RU)).
To fully evaluate the selectivity and specificity of the detection method here, PrPSc (50 ng/mL) in both PBS buffer and NBCS, three different reagents (MPA, thioPEG and Cys-protein G, 50 ng/mL) which all have sulfhydryl groups and can assemble on the gold surface, PrPC (50 ng/mL), and the mixture of PrPSc (50 ng/mL) and each of the four different reagents (50 ng/mL) were measured respectively. The results are shown in Figure 7B, from which it can be observed that samples containing PrPSc have an average response of ~370 RU which is much greater than that of the other four samples, indicating the sufficient specificity of the treatment approach for PrPSc detection.
A calibration curve was obtained after detecting PrPSc in human serum using the MMs-involving SPR detection system constructed in this work (Figure 7B). The linear regression equation was y = 86.93x + 214.27 (R2 = 0.98, x is the logarithm of PrPSc concentration (Log (ng/mL)) and y is the SPR signal (RU)). RSD was 2.72% (n = 5) for 0.01 ng/mL PrPSc. The corresponding recovery is 108.5%. This good linearity and recovery showed that the detection assay constructed here could be applied in detection of PrPSc in real sample.

4. Conclusions

This is the first report on the usage of MMs and their controlled release property, for selective capture, embedding, concentration, and SPR detection of PrPSc with high sensitivity and specificity. AMNPs were used for specific capture of PrPSc and for the amplification of detection signals. Amphiphilic copolymer was used to embed the labeled PrPSc and form magnetic microspheres to isolate PrPSc from the external environment. Static magnetic and alternating magnetic fields were used to concentrate and control release of the embedded PrPSc, respectively. The released AMNPs-labeled PrPSc was detected by SPR which was equipped with a bare gold sensing film. A good linear relationship was obtained between SPR responses and the logarithm of PrPSc concentrations over a range of 0.01–1000 ng/mL. The detection sensitivity for PrPSc was improved by 10 fold compared with SPR direct detection format. The specificity of the present biosensor was also determined by PrPC and other reagents as controls. This proposed approach could also be used to isolate and detect other highly pathogenic biomolecules with similar structural characteristics by altering the corresponding aptamer in the AMNPs conjugates.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61601227), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621598), Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160939), Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (16KJB180010), Student Practice Innovation and Training Program of Nanjing Forestry University (2017NFUSPITP105, 2017NFUSPITP092), the Qing Lan Project and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author Contributions

Zhichao Lou conceived and designed the experiment, analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript. He Han and Dun Mao did all the SPR experiments with help of Yibin Jiang. Jianyue Song and Yibin Jiang prepared the samples and did the characterization of the materials. Besides, Zhichao Lou did all the AFM experiments. All the authors contributed to the general discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biasini, E.; Turnbaugh, J.A.; Unterberger, U.; Harris, D.A. Prion protein at the crossroads of physiology and disease. Trends Neurosci. 2012, 35, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Taylor, D.M. Inactivation of Transmissible Degenerative Encephalopathy Agents: A Review. Vet. J. 2000, 159, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jackson, G.S.; Hosszu, L.L.; Power, A.; Hill, A.F.; Kenney, J.; Saibil, H.; Craven, C.J.; Waltho, J.P.; Clarke, A.R.; Collinge, J. Reversible conversion of monomeric human prion protein between native and fibrilogenic conformations. Science 1999, 283, 1935–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pan, K.M.; Baldwin, M.; Nguyen, J.; Gasset, M.; Serban, A.; Groth, D.; Mehlhorn, I.; Huang, Z.; Fletterick, R.J.; Cohen, F.E. Conversion of alpha-helices into beta-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 10962–10966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hoa, X.D.; Kirk, A.G.; Tabrizian, M. Towards integrated and sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors: A review of recent progress. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Situ, C.; Mooney, M.H.; Elliott, C.T.; Buijs, J. Advances in surface plasmon resonance biosensor technology towards high-throughput, food-safety analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Helmerhorst, E.; Chandler, D.J.; Nussio, M.; Mamotte, C.D. Real-time and Label-free Bio-sensing of Molecular Interactions by Surface Plasmon Resonance: A Laboratory Medicine Perspective. Clin. Biochem. Rev. Aust. Assoc. Clin. Biochem. 2012, 33, 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  8. Miodek, A.; Poturnayová, A.; Snejdárková, M.; Hianik, T.; Korri-Youssoufi, H. Binding kinetics of human cellular prion detection by DNA aptamers immobilized on a conducting polypyrrole. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 2505–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jiayu, W.; Xiong, W.; Jiping, L.; Wensen, L.; Ming, X.; Linna, L.; Jing, X.; Haiying, W.; Hongwei, G. A rapid method for detection of PrP by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Arch. Virol. 2009, 154, 1901–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. MacGregor, I.R.; Drummond, O. Species differences in the blood content of the normal cellular isoform of prion protein, PrP(c), measured by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay. Vox Sang. 2001, 81, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nguyen, V.-T.; Seo, H.B.; Kim, B.C.; Kim, S.K.; Song, C.-S.; Gu, M.B. Highly sensitive sandwich-type SPR based detection of whole H5Nx viruses using a pair of aptamers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, Q.; Li, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J. Hollow gold nanoparticle-enhanced SPR based sandwich immunoassay for human cardiac troponin I. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 2395–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, B.; Lou, Z.; Park, B.; Kwon, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, B. Surface conformations of an anti-ricin aptamer and its affinity for ricin determined by atomic force microscopy and surface plasmon resonance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 17, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lou, Z.; Wang, B.; Guo, C.; Wang, K.; Zhang, H.; Xu, B. Molecular-level insights of early-stage prion protein aggregation on mica and gold surface determined by AFM imaging and molecular simulation. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, B.; Guo, C.; Lou, Z.; Xu, B. Following the aggregation of human prion protein on Au(111) surface in real-time. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2088–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rhie, A.; Kirby, L.; Sayer, N.; Wellesley, R.; Disterer, P.; Sylvester, I.; Gill, A.; Hope, J.; James, W.; Tahiri-Alaoui, A. Characterization of 2′-Fluoro-RNA Aptamers That Bind Preferentially to Disease-associated Conformations of Prion Protein and Inhibit Conversion. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 39697–39705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hong, R.-Y.; Li, J.-H.; Zhang, S.-Z.; Li, H.-Z.; Zheng, Y.; Ding, J.; Wei, D.-G. Preparation and characterization of silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles used as precursor of ferrofluids. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 3485–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamaura, M.; Camilo, R.L.; Sampaio, L.C.; Macêdo, M.A.; Nakamura, M.; Toma, H.E. Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane-coated magnetite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 279, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, X.; Li, H.; Liu, G.; Deng, Z.; Wu, S.; Li, P.; Xu, Z.; Xu, H.; Chu, P.K. Magnetite-loaded fluorine-containing polymeric micelles for magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3013–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Horcas, I.; Fernández, R.; Gómez-Rodríguez, J.M.; Colchero, J.; Gómez-Herrero, J.; Baro, A.M. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 013705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bürger, A.; Wagner, C.; Viedt, C.; Reis, B.; Hug, F.; Hänsch, G.M. Fibronectin synthesis by human tubular epithelial cells in culture: Effects of PDGF and TGF-β on synthesis and splicing. Kidney Int. 1998, 54, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, J.; Munir, A.; Zhu, Z.; Zhou, H.S. Magnetic Nanoparticle Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensing and Its Application for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Magnetic Nanoparticle-Enriched Small Molecules. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6782–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Homola, J. Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The schematic representation of (A) the synthesis processes of AMNPs, (B) the synthesis processes of amphiphilic copolymer, and (C) the capture, embedding and concentration processes of PrPSc.
Figure 1. The schematic representation of (A) the synthesis processes of AMNPs, (B) the synthesis processes of amphiphilic copolymer, and (C) the capture, embedding and concentration processes of PrPSc.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g001
Figure 2. (A) TEM results of AMNPs and corresponding size distribution; (B) AFM results of AMNPs and corresponding size distribution; (C) UV-Vis spectra of APTES-Fe3O4 (black) and AMNPs (red); (D) FT-IR results of copolymer (black), AMNPs (blue) and MMs (red); (E) AFM results of MMs and the cross-section profile of the dashed blue line, and two zoom-in TEM images of MMs.
Figure 2. (A) TEM results of AMNPs and corresponding size distribution; (B) AFM results of AMNPs and corresponding size distribution; (C) UV-Vis spectra of APTES-Fe3O4 (black) and AMNPs (red); (D) FT-IR results of copolymer (black), AMNPs (blue) and MMs (red); (E) AFM results of MMs and the cross-section profile of the dashed blue line, and two zoom-in TEM images of MMs.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g002
Figure 3. Magnetization hysteresis of Fe3O4 (black), AMNPs (blue) and MMs (red).
Figure 3. Magnetization hysteresis of Fe3O4 (black), AMNPs (blue) and MMs (red).
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g003
Figure 4. (A) Temperature vs. time curve of MMs; (B) Thermal images of MMs at time points in (A); (C) The orthophenanthroline spectrophotometry curves of iron elements in filtrates at time points; (D) The absorbance at 510 nm vs. time curve.
Figure 4. (A) Temperature vs. time curve of MMs; (B) Thermal images of MMs at time points in (A); (C) The orthophenanthroline spectrophotometry curves of iron elements in filtrates at time points; (D) The absorbance at 510 nm vs. time curve.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g004
Figure 5. AFM images of (A) bare gold surface, and the surface morphology of the substrate (B) after direct detection of PrPSc/BSA, (C) after the detection of the purified sample and (D) after the detection of the released AMNPs labeled PrPSc.
Figure 5. AFM images of (A) bare gold surface, and the surface morphology of the substrate (B) after direct detection of PrPSc/BSA, (C) after the detection of the purified sample and (D) after the detection of the released AMNPs labeled PrPSc.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g005
Figure 6. (A) The SPR detection signals of the treated (red), untreated (blue) and the purified (black) samples. Insert: Schematics of the SPR detections. (B) SPR sensorgram and (C) calibration curve of the SPR detection assay for PrPSc at different concentrations.
Figure 6. (A) The SPR detection signals of the treated (red), untreated (blue) and the purified (black) samples. Insert: Schematics of the SPR detections. (B) SPR sensorgram and (C) calibration curve of the SPR detection assay for PrPSc at different concentrations.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g006
Figure 7. (A) Specific analysis of MMs involved SPR amplification detection. 1–4: MPA, thioPEG, Cys-protein G and PrPC (50 ng/mL each) in PBS buffer, respectively; 5: PrPSc (50 ng/mL) in PBS buffer; 6: PrPSc (50 ng/mL) in NBCS; 7–10: Mixture of PrPSc (50 ng/mL) and each of the four different reagents (50 ng/mL) in PBS buffer. (B) Calibration curve of MMs involved SPR detection assay for PrPSc in human serum.
Figure 7. (A) Specific analysis of MMs involved SPR amplification detection. 1–4: MPA, thioPEG, Cys-protein G and PrPC (50 ng/mL each) in PBS buffer, respectively; 5: PrPSc (50 ng/mL) in PBS buffer; 6: PrPSc (50 ng/mL) in NBCS; 7–10: Mixture of PrPSc (50 ng/mL) and each of the four different reagents (50 ng/mL) in PBS buffer. (B) Calibration curve of MMs involved SPR detection assay for PrPSc in human serum.
Nanomaterials 08 00107 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lou, Z.; Han, H.; Mao, D.; Jiang, Y.; Song, J. Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020107

AMA Style

Lou Z, Han H, Mao D, Jiang Y, Song J. Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Nanomaterials. 2018; 8(2):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020107

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lou, Zhichao, He Han, Dun Mao, Yibin Jiang, and Jianyue Song. 2018. "Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)" Nanomaterials 8, no. 2: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020107

APA Style

Lou, Z., Han, H., Mao, D., Jiang, Y., & Song, J. (2018). Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Nanomaterials, 8(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8020107

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop