Next Article in Journal
Dewetting Metal Nanofilms—Effect of Substrate on Refractive Index Sensitivity of Nanoplasmonic Gold
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Au/Si Disk-Shaped Nanoresonators on Gold Film for Amplified SERS Chemical Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Stability Evaluation of Polystyrene-Mg/Zn/Al LDH Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
SERS-Active Cu Nanoparticles on Carbon Nitride Support Fabricated Using Pulsed Laser Ablation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controlling the Morphologies of Silver Aggregates by Laser-Induced Synthesis for Optimal SERS Detection

Beijing Key Laboratory of Nano-Photonics and Nano-Structure (NPNS), Department of Physics, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(11), 1529; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111529
Submission received: 29 September 2019 / Revised: 22 October 2019 / Accepted: 22 October 2019 / Published: 27 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Novel Plasmonic Nanomaterials on SERS)

Abstract

:
Controlling the synthesis of metallic nanostructures for high quality surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) materials has long been a central task of nanoscience and nanotechnology. In this work, silver aggregates with different surface morphologies were controllably synthesized on a glass–solution interface via a facile laser-induced reduction method. By correlating the surface morphologies with their SERS abilities, optimal parameters (laser power and irradiation time) for SERS aggregates synthesis were obtained. Importantly, the characteristics for largest near-field enhancement were identified, which are closely packed nanorice and flake structures with abundant surface roughness. These can generate numerous hot spots with huge enhancement in nanogaps and rough surface. These results provide an understanding of the correlation between morphologies and SERS performance, and could be helpful for developing optimal and applicable SERS materials.

1. Introduction

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a powerful, nondestructive analytical tool owing to its high molecular specificity and sensitivity [1,2,3]. It has demonstrated promising applications in the fields of single-molecule spectroscopy [4,5], biochemical analysis [6,7,8,9,10], environmental monitoring [11,12,13,14], food safety [15,16], and even monitoring the reaction process at a molecular level [17,18,19,20]. The phenomenon of SERS is generally explained by a combination of electromagnetic [21,22,23,24] and chemical [25,26,27] enhancements. The former involves the enhancement of the electric field by the surface plasmons resonance of metallic nanoparticles. Especially, when two nanostructures are brought together, a giant local field can be generated in the gap or crevice due to the surface plasmons coupling, which is a hot spot for SERS detection [28,29,30,31,32]. The latter mainly originates from the charge transfer between the adsorbates and metal surface [25,26,27]. With respect to electromagnetic enhancement, a number of techniques have been developed to rationally design the SERS substrates with a large density of hot spots in order to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of SERS measurements [33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. For instance, metallic nanostructures with various shapes, such as silver and gold spheres [40,41], cubes [42,43], polyhedrons [44,45], rods [46,47], and wires [48,49] have been chemically synthesized. When dropping the colloidal suspensions on an omniphobic or slippery substrate, SERS hot spots can be formed when the nanoparticles self-assemble during solvent evaporation [50,51]. On this slippery SERS platform, reproducibility can reach 25% for single-molecule SERS detection (~10−13 M) and can rapidly increase to >90% at higher detection concentrations (>10−12 M) [50]. On the other hand, it has been reported that silver aggregates with dense hot spots can directly grow on the interface of indium tin oxide (ITO) and reaction solution by a simple laser-induced photochemical reduction [52,53,54,55]. This laser-direct writing method provides a rapid, controllable, and low-cost way to synthesize SERS active materials. More importantly, this technique can integrate the SERS substrates directly into the microfluidic channel in a controlled fashion to create a lab-on-a-chip SERS system. It has the advantages of in situ preparation, automation, and real time detection, and avoids the unexpected contamination or oxidation degrading of SERS substrates, thus enables reproducible and sensitive SERS measurements [56,57,58]. With this silver aggregates-based SERS chip, the reproducibility of single-molecule SERS measurements can be raised up to ~50% [59]. We know the growth of silver aggregates on a glass–solution interface is highly dependent on laser power and irradiation time. Hence, it is critical to understand the correlation between the morphologies of aggregates and the corresponding SERS ability to optimize the performance of SERS materials synthesized by this laser-induced photochemical reduction method.
In this work, the laser-induced growths of silver aggregates on an ITO–solution interface were systematically investigated by tuning the power and irradiation time (532 nm laser). These structures can generate numerous hot spots at both the nanogaps and rough surface. By correlating the aggregates morphologies with their SERS abilities, the critical structure characteristics for large near-field enhancement were identified, which were closely packed nanorice and flake structures with abundant surface roughness. The understanding of the relation between morphology and SERS performance would be beneficial for developing optimal and applicable SERS materials.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. In Situ Synthesis of Silver Aggregates

Silver nitrate and sodium citrate dihydrate of analytical grade were bought from Sigma-Aldrich. Deionized water was used to prepare the solutions. The reactant mixture was obtained by mixing aqueous solutions of silver nitrate (0.1 mM) and sodium citrate (0.08 mM) in a 1:1 volume ratio. Then, a drip of reactant mixture was placed in a cell made up of a slide of ITO glass and a cover glass. A 532 nm continuous wave laser was focused on the ITO glass through an objective with 50× magnification (N.A. = 0.5). The power was tuned in the range of 0.4–0.9 mW by an attenuator. Laser irradiation time was set in the range of 30–180 s. The final products on ITO glass were rinsed for 5 min with deionized water to remove excess reactants. Using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4800, 10 kV, Hitachi, Japan), the morphologies of silver aggregates synthesized under different power and irradiation time were characterized. With the help of coordinates on ITO glass, each characterized silver nanoaggregates could be specifically found again under an optical microscope.

2.2. SERS Measurements

The SERS measurements were performed on an inVia Renishaw Raman Spectrometer at the excitation of a 532 nm laser (Renishaw, UK). A 50× magnification (N.A. = 0.5) objective was used. Here, the laser for Raman excitation was the same as the one used for photo reduction. The Raman excitation power was about 14 μW and integration time was 10 s, unless stated otherwise. Crystal violet (CV) with a concentration of 10−7 M in ethanol was chosen as the SERS analyte. The SERS sample was prepared by dropping 20 μL CV solution onto the ITO slide with silver aggregates. After it dried under ambient conditions, the area of the dried spot was about 1 cm2. For polarization measurements, the SERS spectra were repeatedly detected at the same position by changing the excitation polarization. To minimize the photobleaching-induced SERS decay [33], the integration time was set to 1 s. The intrinsic polarization dependence of the Raman instrument was calibrated by the Raman peak of silicon (111) surface.

3. Results and Discussion

Our experimental setup for the laser-induced synthesis of silver aggregates is schematically shown in Figure 1a (for details, see Experimental Section). A 532 nm continuous wave laser was focused onto the cell filled with reactant solution prepared by silver nitrate and sodium citrate. Then, the citrate reduced the silver ions to atoms at room temperature via a photooxidation mechanism, dissociating a hydrogen ion from the hydroxyl group on the citrate and converting it to acetone-1,3-dicarboxylate and carbon dioxide [60,61,62]. With the continuous increase of silver atoms, silver aggregate structures grew on the ITO–solution interface in a few seconds, and were observed under the microscope. The SEM image of a typical product synthesized by 60 s exposure at a laser power of 0.9 mW is shown in Figure 1b. From the SEM images, we found that the aggregate spot was about 10 μm in size and was made up of numerous nanorice and flake structures, with an average length of about 460 nm. These surface textures could form dense gaps or crevices and tips, which could generate a huge number of hot spots for SERS detection.
The SERS performances of the prepared silver aggregates were then experimentally characterized by using 10−7 M CV as the probe. Curve I in Figure 2a shows the raw Raman spectrum obtained from CV powder. The Raman fingerprints at 913, 1174, 1375, 1584, and 1616 cm−1 were identified and were mainly from the vibrations of benzene ring [63]. The corresponding SERS spectrum of CV on the as-prepared silver aggregates is shown in curve II. By comparing to the spectrum from powder, we found that the Raman scattering intensity was greatly enhanced. According to the absorption spectrum of CV (Figure S1), resonant Raman scattering can be obtained under the excitation of 532 nm. Hence, the enhancement should come from the combined contributions of plasmonic effect and molecular resonance effect, which is surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering. Generally, the enhancement factor (EF) can be evaluated by the following equation:
EF = I S E R S I B u l k × N B u l k N S E R S   ,
where ISERS and IBulk are the intensity of a Raman mode with and without surface enhancement, respectively, and NSERS and NBulk refer to the corresponding number of CV molecules [64,65,66]. By choosing the CV band at 1174 cm−1 as a reference, the EF was estimated to be 2.0 × 107 (see supporting information for details). Considering that the bulk Raman was also excited by 532 nm laser, the molecular resonance effect would be offset to some extent in EF evaluation. Hence, the EF calculated by Equation 1 can be attributed to electromagnetic enhancement of silver aggregates. Here, we should emphasize that the EF is an average value over the whole surface of silver aggregates. The enhancements on the tips of nanorices and flakes or inside the gaps of nanoaggregates would be much larger. As is known, the electromagnetic enhancement of metallic nanostructures is highly dependent on excitation polarization [67,68]. Hence, the polarization-dependent SERS of these silver aggregates were investigated. The normalized SERS intensity of CV under different incident polarizations are shown in the polar plot (Figure 2b). Unlike the highly polarization-dependent single-nanogap system [68], the aggregates structure was insensitive to the excitation polarization with the SERS intensity fluctuation at orthogonal polarizations less than 20%. This is to be expected because the as-prepared silver aggregates were made up of dense nanogaps or crevices with random sizes and orientations (Figure 1b).
To seek the optimal synthesis parameters, SERS aggregates were created under different laser power (0.4, 0.6, and 0.9 mW) and irradiation time (30, 60, 120, and 180 s). The morphologies of the prepared aggregates are summarized in Figure 3a. To clarify the influence of the laser power and irradiation time, we first analyzed the morphological changes as the increase of irradiation time at certain laser power. Such as the aggregates (i–iv), under the parameters: power = 0.4 mW, time = 30 s (i), a layer of silver nanoparticles with an average diameter of ~100 nm first formed on the ITO substrate. Then, for a longer irradiation time of ~60 s (ii), these nanoparticles became denser, and some nanorice structures began to emerge. Further increasing the irradiation time to 120 and 180 s (iii and iv) resulted in the nanorices growing larger and denser, with the length reaching up to ~400 nm. We then focused on the influence of irradiation power. The morphological changes that occurred as the laser power increased at certain irradiation times are shown by column. Along with aggregates i, v and ix, we also observed morphological changes from nanoparticles to nanorices. Based on these morphological evolutions, we deduced that the growth of silver aggregates was tuned by the photon dose through the combination effect of photoinduced growth and coalescence [53,69,70]: ① The silver nuclei were first formed in solution and then grown into nanoparticles through Ostwald ripening. ② As the nanoparticles grew, the adjacent particles began to coalesce with each other and formed linear polycrystalline structures called nanorices. Some concaves between the connected particles can still be observed from the SEM images of aggregates ii, iii, v and vi (see the magnified images in Figure S2 for details). ③ The nanorices grew via the atoms and/or nuclei addition. Finally, some nanoflake structures were formed. Here, we should note that the growth rate of the nanostructures can be tuned by the concentration of the reducing agent (citrate) [53]. As shown in Figure S3, we monitored the growth of silver aggregates under different citrate concentrations (0.01, 0.08, and 0.64 mM). The dark-field scattering images show that aggregates grew slowly under lower citrate concentrations. Under relatively high citrate concentrations, dense aggregates can form quickly in tens of seconds. In our experiments (data in Figure 3), a moderate citrate concentration (0.08 mM) was adopted to provide better controllability by the laser power and irradiation time.
Then, the SERS performance of these synthesized silver aggregates was investigated using 10−7 M CV as a probe. The corresponding SERS spectra are shown in Figure S4. Figure 3b presents the statistics of the peak intensity at 1174 cm−1. Depending on the SERS intensity, the silver aggregates can be separated into two groups. For the first group (i, ii, v, vi), the enhancement was relatively low, with SERS intensity in the range of 2600–4600, where the aggregates were dominated by nanoparticles. Interestingly, the second group with compact nanorices aggregates (iii, iv, vii, viii, ix, x, xi) exhibited prominent SERS signals, among which the largest SERS intensity could reach up to 19,000 (x). From the SEM images in Figure 3a, we noticed that the aggregates x was composed of closely packed nanorice and flake structures with abundant surface roughness. This can be understood by the fact that the roughened nanorices and flakes aggregates can enhance the local field in two ways. One is the smaller nanogaps/crevices with higher near-field enhancement. On average, the compact nanostructures in group two (such as the aggregates x) generate smaller gaps than the sparsely small nanoparticles in group one (such as aggregates i), as shown in Figure S5. The other is from the abundant rough structures on the nanorices and flakes surface. The contribution of surface roughness to near-field enhancement on a mesostructure has also been confirmed by previous experiments and simulations [71,72,73]. Numerical simulations were also performed to help visualize the enhancement contributions from gaps and rough surface. As shown in Figure S6, the two coupled nanorices generated obvious near-field enhancement at both the gap and rough surface positions. While, the SERS intensity decreased in the case of aggregates xii, though the laser irradiation time (180 s) was longer than that of aggregate × (60 s). This could be caused by the disappearance of surface roughness during nanostructures overgrowth. The zoomed in images of aggregates x and xii are compared in Figure S5. Additionally, the overgrowth of nanostructures can also quench some nanogap enhancement due to the direct contact between the nanostructures.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a highly active silver aggregates SERS material was directly synthesized on the ITO–solution interface via a facile in situ photochemical reduction method. The morphologies of these aggregates were effectively controlled by laser power and irradiation time. By correlating the morphologies with their SERS signals, the best SERS aggregates were obtained under the synthesis parameters: power = 0.9 mW, time = 60 s. The average SERS EF was as large as 2.0 × 107. Importantly, the morphology features of optimal SERS aggregates were identified. Aggregates composed of packed nanorices and flakes with abundant surface roughness would possess better SERS ability. An understanding of the relation between morphology and SERS performance would be beneficial for controlled synthesis of optimal SERS materials with a high density of hot spots, and the development of practical SERS techniques.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/11/1529/s1. Contents: SERS enhancement factor estimation. Figure S1. The absorption spectrum of 10−4 M CV in water; Figure S2. The morphological evolutions of silver aggregates; Figure S3. Monitoring the silver aggregates growths under different citrate concentrations; Figure S4. The SERS spectra measured on the silver aggregates synthesized under different parameters; Figure S5. The magnified images of aggregates i, x and xii; Figure S6. The numerical simulations of the local field distributions around the two coupled roughened nanorices.

Author Contributions

Z.L. and L.Y. supervised the experiments; J.Y.; X.C. and P.L. performed the experiments; Y.L. performed the numerical simulations; L.Y. and Z.L. analyzed the data; L.Y. and Z.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774245 and 11704266), the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation, China (Grant No. 151010), the General Foundation of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (Grant No. KM201810028006), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z190006), the Training Program of the Major Research Plan of Capital Normal University, Yanjing Scholar Foundation of Capital Normal University, and the Scientific Research Base Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774245 and 11704266), the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation, China (Grant No. 151010), the General Foundation of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (Grant No. KM201810028006), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z190006), the Training Program of the Major Research Plan of Capital Normal University, Yanjing Scholar Foundation of Capital Normal University, and the Scientific Research Base Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, B.; Frontiera, R.R.; Henry, A.I.; Ringe, E.; Van Duyne, R.P. SERS: Materials, applications, and the future. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hakonen, A.; Andersson, P.O.; Schmidt, M.S.; Rindzevicius, T.; Käll, M. Explosive and chemical threat detection by surface-enhanced Raman scattering: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 893, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Panneerselvam, R.; Liu, G.-K.; Wang, Y.-H.; Liu, J.-Y.; Ding, S.-Y.; Li, J.-F.; Wu, D.-Y.; Tian, Z.-Q. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: Bottlenecks and future directions. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lim, D.-K.; Jeon, K.-S.; Kim, H.M.; Nam, J.-M.; Suh, Y.D. Nanogap-engineerable Raman-active nanodumbbells for single-molecule detection. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, H.; Bjerneld, E.J.; Käll, M.; Börjesson, L. Spectroscopy of single hemoglobin molecules by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, J.; Zhang, N.; Ji, D.; Song, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Sun, Z.; Jornet, J.M.; Thompson, A.C.; Collins, R.L.; et al. Superabsorbing metasurfaces with hybrid Ag–Au nanostructures for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy sensing of drugs and chemicals. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yap, L.W.; Chen, H.; Gao, Y.; Petkovic, K.; Liang, Y.; Si, K.J.; Wang, H.; Tang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, W. Bifunctional plasmonic-magnetic particles for an enhanced microfluidic SERS immunoassay. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 7822–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cottat, M.; Lidgi-Guigui, N.; Tijunelyte, I.; Barbillon, G.; Hamouda, F.; Gogol, P.; Aassime, A.; Lourtioz, J.-M.; Bartenlian, B.; Chapelle, M.L.D.L. Soft UV nanoimprint lithography-designed highly sensitive substrates for SERS detection. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, D.; Qi, G.; Xu, S.; Xu, W. Construction of highly sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanosensor aimed for the testing of glucose in urine. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 53800–53803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Y.; Zhou, T.; You, R.; Wu, Y.; Shen, H.; Feng, S.; Su, J. Fabrication and characterization of a highly-sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanosensor for detecting glucose in urine. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, P.; Li, M.; Jurevic, R.; Cushing, S.K.; Liu, Y.; Wu, N. A gold nanohole array based surface-enhanced Raman scattering biosensor for detection of silver (I) and mercury (II) in human saliva. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11005–11012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duan, J.; Yang, M.; Lai, Y.; Yuan, J.; Zhan, J. A colorimetric and surface-enhanced Raman scattering dual-signal sensor for Hg2+ based on bismuthiol II-capped gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 723, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, X.; Dai, Z.; Si, S.; Zhang, X.; Wu, W.; Deng, H.; Wang, F.; Xiao, X.; Jiang, C. Ultrasensitive SERS substrate integrated with uniform subnanometer scale “hot spots” created by a graphene spacer for the detection of mercury ions. Small 2017, 13, 1603347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, H.; Ye, S.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xie, F.; Gong, L.; Fang, P.; Chen, J.; Tong, Y. A simple and highly sensitive thymine sensor for mercury ion detection based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and the mechanism study. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, J.F.; Huang, Y.F.; Ding, Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, S.B.; Zhou, X.S.; Fan, F.R.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Wu, D.Y.; et al. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 2010, 464, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tian, H.; Zhang, N.; Tong, L.; Zhang, J. In situ quantitative graphene-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Small Methods 2017, 1, 1700126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, P.; Ma, B.; Yang, L.; Liu, J. Hybrid single nanoreactor for in situ sers monitoring of plasmon-driven and small Au nanoparticles catalyzed reactions. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11394–11397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, H.; Xu, H. In-situ plasmon-driven chemical reactions revealed by high vacuum tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, W.; Jing, Q.; Du, Y.; Zhang, B.; Meng, X.; Sun, M.; Schanze, K.S.; Gao, H.; Xu, P. An in situ SERS study of substrate-dependent surface plasmon induced aromatic nitration. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 5285–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, Q.; Zhang, C.; Gao, W.; Han, Z.; Liu, T.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; He, E.; Zheng, H. Ag-Au alloy nanoparticles: Synthesis and in situ monitoring SERS of plasmonic catalysis. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 231, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, H.; Aizpurua, J.; Käll, M.; Apell, P. Electromagnetic contributions to single-molecule sensitivity in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. McMahon, J.M.; Henry, A.-I.; Wustholz, K.L.; Natan, M.J.; Freeman, R.G.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Schatz, G.C. Gold nanoparticle dimer plasmonics: Finite element method calculations of the electromagnetic enhancement to surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 394, 1819–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Z.Y. Mesoscopic and microscopic strategies for engineering plasmon-enhanced Raman scattering. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1701097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ding, S.-Y.; You, E.-M.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Moskovits, M. Electromagnetic theories of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4042–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, B.; Lin, X.-F.; Yang, Z.-L.; Liu, G.-K.; Aroca, R.F.; Mao, B.-W.; Tian, Z.-Q. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering in the ultraviolet spectral region: UV-SERS on rhodium and ruthenium electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9598–9599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, D.-Y.; Liu, X.-M.; Duan, S.; Xu, X.; Ren, B.; Lin, S.-H.; Tian, Z.-Q. Chemical enhancement effects in SERS spectra: A quantum chemical study of pyridine interacting with copper, silver, gold and platinum metals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4195–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Valley, N.; Greeneltch, N.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Schatz, G.C. A look at the origin and magnitude of the chemical contribution to the enhancement mechanism of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS): Theory and experiment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 2599–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Halas, N.J.; Lal, S.; Chang, W.-S.; Link, S.; Nordlander, P. Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3913–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, S.; Meng, L.-Y.; Shan, H.-Y.; Li, J.-F.; Qian, L.; Williams, C.T.; Yang, Z.-L.; Tian, Z.-Q. How to light special hot spots in multiparticle–film configurations. ACS Nano 2015, 10, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.-J.; Chen, S.; Radjenovic, P.; Bodappa, N.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.-L.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Li, J.-F. Probing the location of 3D hot spots in gold nanoparticle films using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 5316–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zong, S.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Y. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering based in situ hybridization strategy for telomere length assessment. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2950–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lu, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, K.; Cui, Y. Mixing assisted “hot spots” occupying SERS strategy for highly sensitive in situ study. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4535–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liang, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Xu, H. Highly surface-roughened “flower-like” silver nanoparticles for extremely sensitive substrates of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4614–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Meng, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, L.; Liu, J.; Tian, Z. Three-dimensional and time-ordered surface-enhanced Raman scattering hot-spot matrix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5332–5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, T.; Sander, T.; Chen, L.; Klar, P.J. Centimeter-scale-homogeneous SERS substrates with seven-order global enhancement through thermally controlled plasmonic nanostructures. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5099–5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.; Shi, H.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, S.; Ye, H. Sharp convex gold grooves for fluorescence enhancement in micro/nano fluidic biosensing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8839–8844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barbillon, G. Fabrication and SERS performances of metal/Si and metal/ZnO nanosensors: A review. Coatings 2019, 9, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, X.; Deng, M.; Rao, G.; Yan, Y.; Wu, C.; Jiao, Y.; Deng, A.; Yan, C.; Huang, J.; Wu, S.; et al. High-performance SERS substrate based on hierarchical 3D Cu nanocrystals with efficient morphology control. Small 2018, 14, 1802477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, Q.; Xu, M.; Yuan, Y.; Gu, R.; Yao, J. Self-assembled large-scale monolayer of Au nanoparticles at the air/water interface used as a SERS substrate. Langmuir 2016, 32, 4530–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, Y.-J.; Schade, N.B.; Sun, L.; Fan, J.A.; Bae, D.R.; Mariscal, M.M.; Lee, G.; Capasso, F.; Sacanna, S.; Manoharan, V.N.; et al. Ultrasmooth, highly spherical monocrystalline gold particles for precision plasmonics. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 11064–11070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.; Jia, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, B.; Zhao, B.; Li, B.; Ozaki, Y. Mercaptoacetic acid-capped silver nanoparticles colloid: Formation, morphology, and SERS activity. Langmuir 2003, 19, 4285–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, J.-M.; Yang, Y.; Qin, D. Hollow nanocubes made of Ag–Au alloys for SERS detection with sensitivity of 10−8 M for melamine. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 9934–9940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Y.; Xia, Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science 2002, 298, 2176–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kozuch, J.; Petrusch, N.; Gkogkou, D.; Gernert, U.; Weidinger, I.M. Calculating average surface enhancement factors of randomly nanostructured electrodes by a combination of SERS and impedance spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 21220–21225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tao, A.; Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Yang, P. Polyhedral silver nanocrystals with distinct scattering signatures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4597–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, S.-Y.; Tian, X.-D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.-F. Quantitative surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy through the interface-assisted self-assembly of three-dimensional silver nanorod substrates. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 7275–7282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Q.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ye, S.; Zhang, H.; Xie, F.; Gong, L.; Wei, Z.; Jin, H.; Chen, J. Highly sensitive detection of glucose: A quantitative approach employing nanorods assembled plasmonic substrate. Talanta 2017, 165, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, S.; Kim, D.-H.; Park, S.-G. Highly sensitive and on-site NO2 SERS sensors operated under ambient conditions. Analyst 2018, 143, 3006–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fang, Y.; Wei, H.; Hao, F.; Nordlander, P.; Xu, H. Remote-excitation surface-enhanced Raman scattering using propagating Ag nanowire plasmons. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 2049–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, S.; Dai, X.; Stogin, B.B.; Wong, T.-S. Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection in common fluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Huang, H.; Li, P.; Guo, Z.; Luo, Q.; Wang, Z.; Chu, P.K.; Li, J.; Yu, X.-F. Efficient enrichment and self-assembly of hybrid nanoparticles into removable and magnetic SERS substrates for sensitive detection of environmental pollutants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7472–7480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bjerneld, E.J.; Murty, K.; Prikulis, J.; Käll, M. Laser-induced growth of Ag nanoparticles from aqueous solutions. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2002, 3, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bjerneld, E.J.; Svedberg, F.; Käll, M. Laser-induced growth and deposition of noble-metal nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leopold, N.; Lendl, B. On-column silver substrate synthesis and surface-enhanced Raman detection in capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 396, 2341–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Herman, K.; Szabó, L.; Leopold, L.F.; Chiş, V.; Leopold, N. In situ laser-induced photochemical silver substrate synthesis and sequential SERS detection in a flow cell. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, B.-B.; Ma, Z.-C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, R.; Niu, L.-G.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Zheng, W.-H.; Zhao, B.; Xu, Y.; et al. Localized flexible integration of high-efficiency surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) monitors into microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 3347–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xie, Y.; Yang, S.; Mao, Z.; Li, P.; Zhao, C.; Cohick, Z.; Huang, P.-H.; Huang, T.J. In situ fabrication of 3D Ag@ZnO nanostructures for microfluidic surface-enhanced Raman scattering systems. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 12175–12184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, Z.-C.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Han, B.; Liu, X.-Q.; Zhang, H.-Z.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Femtosecond laser direct writing of plasmonic Ag/Pd alloy nanostructures enables flexible integration of robust SERS substrates. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2017, 2, 1600270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yan, W.; Yang, L.; Chen, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, P.; Li, Z. In situ two-step photoreduced SERS materials for on-chip single-molecule spectroscopy with high reproducibility. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lee, G.P.; Bignell, L.J.; Romeo, T.C.; Razal, J.M.; Shepherd, R.L.; Chen, J.; Minett, A.I.; Innis, P.C.; Wallace, G.G. The citrate-mediated shape evolution of transforming photomorphic silver nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7807–7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Condorelli, M.; Scardaci, V.; D’Urso, L.; Puglisi, O.; Fazio, E.; Compagnini, G. Plasmon sensing and enhancement of laser prepared silver colloidal nanoplates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 475, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elechiguerra, J.L.; Reyes-Gasga, J.; Yacaman, M.J. The role of twinning in shape evolution of anisotropic noble metal nanostructures. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 3906–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cañamares, M.V.; Chenal, C.; Birke, R.L.; Lombardi, J.R. DFT, SERS, and single-molecule SERS of crystal violet. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 20295–20300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xing, G.; Wang, K.; Li, P.; Wang, W.; Chen, T. 3D hierarchical Ag nanostructures formed on poly (acrylic acid) brushes grafted graphene oxide as promising SERS substrates. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 115503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, X.; Xiao, X.; Dai, Z.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Fu, L.; Jiang, C. Ultrasensitive SERS performance in 3D “sunflower-like” nanoarrays decorated with Ag nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3114–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bryche, J.-F.; Bélier, B.; Bartenlian, B.; Barbillon, G. Low-cost SERS substrates composed of hybrid nanoskittles for a highly sensitive sensing of chemical molecules. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wiley, B.J.; Chen, Y.; Mclellan, J.M.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Z.; Ginger, D.; Xia, Y. Synthesis and optical properties of silver nanobars and nanorice. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1032–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Xu, H.; Käll, M. Polarization-dependent surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of isolated silver nanoaggregates. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2003, 4, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pong, B.-K.; Elim, H.I.; Chong, J.-X.; Ji, W.; Trout, B.L.; Lee, J.-Y. New insights on the nanoparticle growth mechanism in the citrate reduction of gold (III) salt: Formation of the Au nanowire intermediate and its nonlinear optical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 6281–6287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, T.; Xiao, X.; Yang, C. Surfactantless photochemical deposition of gold nanoparticles on an optical fiber core for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4623–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, H.; Halas, N.J. Mesoscopic Au “meatball” particles. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fang, J.; Du, S.; Lebedkin, S.; Li, Z.; Kruk, R.; Kappes, M.; Hahn, H. Gold mesostructures with tailored surface topography and their self-assembly arrays for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 5006–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Yang, Z.; You, H.; Tian, C.; Li, Z.; Fang, J. Gold mesoparticles with precisely controlled surface topographies for single-particle surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 5567–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Laser-induced growth of silver aggregates. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. (b) SEM image of a typical product fabricated by 60 s exposure at a laser power of 0.9 mW. Inset is a zoomed view of the silver aggregates.
Figure 1. Laser-induced growth of silver aggregates. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. (b) SEM image of a typical product fabricated by 60 s exposure at a laser power of 0.9 mW. Inset is a zoomed view of the silver aggregates.
Nanomaterials 09 01529 g001
Figure 2. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) measurements of the silver aggregates fabricated by 60 s exposure at a laser power of 0.9 mW. (a) Curve I: Raman spectrum of CV powder. Curve II: The SERS spectrum of CV adsorbed on the silver aggregates. (b) Polar plot of SERS intensity (1174 cm−1) under different excitation polarizations (θ).
Figure 2. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) measurements of the silver aggregates fabricated by 60 s exposure at a laser power of 0.9 mW. (a) Curve I: Raman spectrum of CV powder. Curve II: The SERS spectrum of CV adsorbed on the silver aggregates. (b) Polar plot of SERS intensity (1174 cm−1) under different excitation polarizations (θ).
Nanomaterials 09 01529 g002
Figure 3. Controlling synthesis of silver aggregates and their SERS activities. (a) SEM images of silver aggregates grown under different irradiation power (0.4–0.9 mW) and exposure time (30–180 s). The scale bars are all 500 nm. (b) The corresponding SERS intensity from the silver aggregates are shown in (a).
Figure 3. Controlling synthesis of silver aggregates and their SERS activities. (a) SEM images of silver aggregates grown under different irradiation power (0.4–0.9 mW) and exposure time (30–180 s). The scale bars are all 500 nm. (b) The corresponding SERS intensity from the silver aggregates are shown in (a).
Nanomaterials 09 01529 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Li, Z. Controlling the Morphologies of Silver Aggregates by Laser-Induced Synthesis for Optimal SERS Detection. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111529

AMA Style

Yang L, Yang J, Li Y, Li P, Chen X, Li Z. Controlling the Morphologies of Silver Aggregates by Laser-Induced Synthesis for Optimal SERS Detection. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(11):1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Longkun, Jingran Yang, Yuanyuan Li, Pan Li, Xiaojuan Chen, and Zhipeng Li. 2019. "Controlling the Morphologies of Silver Aggregates by Laser-Induced Synthesis for Optimal SERS Detection" Nanomaterials 9, no. 11: 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111529

APA Style

Yang, L., Yang, J., Li, Y., Li, P., Chen, X., & Li, Z. (2019). Controlling the Morphologies of Silver Aggregates by Laser-Induced Synthesis for Optimal SERS Detection. Nanomaterials, 9(11), 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop