Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of BaTiO3-Loaded Graphene Nanosheets-Based Polyarylene Ether Nitrile Nanocomposites with Enhanced Dielectric and Crystallization Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomaterials towards Biosensing of Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Based on CsPbIBr2 and Metal Oxide Transport Layers with Improved Stability

1
Henan Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Materials, College of Physics and Materials Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
2
College of Chemistry and Material Science, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China
3
College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(12), 1666; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9121666
Submission received: 4 November 2019 / Revised: 19 November 2019 / Accepted: 21 November 2019 / Published: 22 November 2019

Abstract

:
Despite the successful improvement in the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), the issue of instability is still a serious challenge for their commercial application. The issue of the PSCs mainly originates from the decomposition of the organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite materials, which will degrade upon humidity and suffer from the thermal environment. In addition, the charge transport layers also influence the stability of the whole devices. In this study, inorganic transport layers are utilized in an inverted structure of PSCs employing CsPbIBr2 as light absorbent layer, in which nickel oxide (NiOx) and cerium oxide (CeOx) films are applied as the hole transport layer (HTL) and the electron transport layer (ETL), respectively. The inorganic transport layers are expected to protect the CsPbIBr2 film from the contact of moisture and react with the metal electrode, thus preventing degradation. The PSC with all inorganic components, inorganic perovskite and inorganic transport layers demonstrates an initial PCE of 5.60% and retains 5.56% after 600 s in ambient air at maximum power point tracking.

1. Introduction

The solar cells adopting organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite as absorber have obtained significant attention in the field of photovoltaics, with an unprecedented rise in power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 3.8% to 25.2% in a few years [1]. Although the highest certified efficiency of the PSCs is comparable to that of commercialized silicon photovoltaic devices, the issue of instability of PSCs has prevented its practical application. In particular, the volatile and hygroscopic nature of the organic cations such as methyl ammonium and formamidinium makes the organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite materials become more unstable under illumination, thermal, moisture and stresses [2,3].
In recent years, cesium lead halide or mixed halide perovskites CsPbX3 have attracted much attention as light absorbent layer materials due to their excellent thermal stability as well as suitable photophysical properties [4,5,6]. In particular, the CsPbIBr2 have emerged as a better candidate among its cousins, because of its capacity to balance the bandgap and its thermal stability [7], which has a bandgap of 2.05 eV, promising a potential highest PCE about 17.5% according to the Shockley–Queisser limit [8] and the material is unexpectedly stable with a melting point more than 460 °C under ambient atmosphere [9]. The higher performance PSCs usually have a sandwich structure, in which the perovskite active layer is placed between a hole transport layer (HTL) and an electron transport layer (ETL). The transport layers not only promote the transportation of the photogenerated carriers produced in the perovskite active layer and prevent carrier recombination at the interfaces, but also form ohmic contact with the electrode. Typically, in a n-i-p structure, the perovskite materials usually are deposited on a compact TiO2 layer and an optional mesoporous TiO2 scaffold layer [10], and covered with a layer of doping 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-p-dimethoxyphenylamino)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) sequentially. As a counterpart, the p–i–n structure, perovskite materials are deposited onto the film of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonic acid (PEDOT:PSS) or poly[bis(4-phenyl)(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA ) and then covered with a layer of [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) or C60. However, PCBM and Spiro-OMeTAD are expensive and the doping agents of Spiro-OMeTAD could break down the electrode and perovskite layers gradually. To achieve novel PSCs with long-term stability and low-cost of fabrication, the strategies of replacing the organic transport layers with inorganic materials such as CuSCN [11], CuI [12], NiOx [13] as the hole transport layers and ZnO [14], CdS [15], SnO2 [16] as the electron transport layers has been extensively explored. The inorganic metal oxides have much higher carrier mobility and superior stability as well as easy-processing from corresponding precursors. Herein, we use cerium oxide (CeOx) as electron transport layers with in situ decomposition from its precursor at low temperature (100 °C) and nickel oxide (NiOx) as hole transport layers from pre-prepared NiOx nanoparticles solution as well as CsPbIBr2 perovskite as the photoactive layer in the device. The prepared perovskite solar cells with a configuration of ITO/NiOx/CsPbIBr2/CeOx/Ag based on an all-metal-oxide charge transport layer and the all-inorganic perovskite material shows 5.60% efficiency and significantly improved stability compared to those reported [17,18].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Sodium hydroxide, Chlorobenzene, Cerium (III) acetylacetonate hydrate and Ni(NO3)2·6H2O were purchased from Aladdin. Reagent (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. Cesium iodide and lead bromide were purchased from Xinxiang Aode New Mater. Co., Let (Xinxiang, China). AGC ITO was purchased from Youxuan Co., Let (Yingkou, China) with 1.1 mm, 7~9 Ω/sq and transmittance about 88%. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were used without purification.

2.2. Methods of Nanoparticles Preparation and Device Fabrication

2.2.1. Preparation of NiOx Nanoparticles

The NiOx nanoparticles were prepared according reported lecture with a little modification [19]. To be specific, A clear green solution of nickel (II) salt was obtained by dissolving 14.55 g (0.05 mol) Ni(NO3)2·6H2O in 100 mL deionized water with vigorous stirring. Then a NaOH aqueous solution of 10 mol L−1 was added to the solution until the pH value reached 10. After another 10 min’ stirring, the obtained green precipitants through suction filtration were transferred to vacuum oven and dried 6 hours at 80 °C under reduced pressure. The NiOx nanoparticles were prepared as dark gray powders by calcining the dried precipitants at 270 °C for 2 h.

2.2.2. Preparation of Precursor Solutions of CeOx and CsPbIBr2

The cerium oxide precursor solution was obtained by dissolving cerium (III) acetylacetonate hydrate (44 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 10 mL chlorobenzene after 30 min treatment of ultrasonication [20,21].
The perovskite (CsPbIBr2) precursor solution was prepared by mixing 2.34 g cesium iodide (CsI) and 3.30 g lead bromide (PbBr2) with equal molar ratio in 10 mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with stirring at 60 °C until all the solid dissolved completely.

2.2.3. Device Fabrication

The pre-patterned indium tin oxide (ITO) glass was cleaned in ultrasonic sequential with detergent, deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol for 15 min, dried in N2, followed by treatment of plasma for 10 min. The film of NiOx was deposited on the ITO substrate using 0.5 mg mL−1 NiOx nanoparticles aqueous solution by spin coating at 2500 r.p.m. for 60 s, and annealed at 150 C for 30 min in air. Then, the perovskite precursor solution was spin-coated on the NiOx film at 2500 r.p.m. for 53 s and annealed on a hot plate at 100 °C for 20 min. The ETL of CeOx was fabricated on the top of the perovskite layer by spin-coating the precursor at 2000 r.p.m. for 30 s and annealed in N2 at 100 °C for 10 min. Finally, 100 nm Ag was thermally evaporated on the ETL as the top metal electrode under a pressure less than 5 × 10−4 Pa.

2.3. Characterization

The top-view and cross-section morphologies of perovskite films of PSC was characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Quanta 200 FEG, FEI Co.). Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) measurements were measured on a ThermoFisher ESCALAB 250Xi instrument using the HeI (21.22 eV) emission line. Water contact angle on these films were recorded with JC000DI contact angle measuring instrument (Zhong Chen. Shanghai, China). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained using a Veeco MultimodeV instrument to evaluate the surface morphology of films in the tapping and intelligent mode. The steady state photoluminescence spectra (PL) and time-resolved photoluminescence spectra (TRPL) were acquired on an FS5 spectrometer from Edinburgh Instruments excited with 500 W Xenon lamp and 5 mW picoseconds pulsed diode laser at 410 ± 10 nm. The solar cells were measured using simulated air mass 1.5 global sunlight (AM 1.5G) conditions (100 mW cm−2) with 2400 Source Meter, Keithley Instruments. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the solar cells were measured using a combined system, including a xenon lamp, monochromator, chopper and lock-in amplifier together with a calibrated silicon photodetector. Perovskite films’ ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) absorption measurements were performed through a Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrometer.

3. Results

NiOx was applied in this work as HTL. The optical and electric properties were measured with UV-Vis spectra and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) (Figure 1).
As shown in Figure 1a, the bandgap of NiOx film could be evaluated from the UV–Vis absorbance spectrometry. The direct bandgap energy (Eg) can be determined using the direct transition equation [22] ( α h ν ) 2 = A ( h ν E g ) . The plot of (αhv)2 versus hv is given in the inset of Figure 1a, and the curve is obtained by the M-K equation. Eg for the NiOx film is determined to be 3.7 eV. The UPS of the NiOx film is shown in Figure 1b, indicating the work function of the film. The calculated results of the valence band energy level as shown in Figure 1c is 5.42 eV, facilitating the extraction of holes from perovskite, while the conductive band energy level could be calculated as 1.72 eV through the optical bandgap and the valence band energy level, which is higher than that of CsPbIBr2 as shown in Figure 1c, blocking the injection of electrons.
Generally, the morphology of perovskite film can influence the performance of perovskite solar cells. The morphology of the CsPbIBr2 films is characterized by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Figure 2). The image of the top-view SEM of CsPbIBr2 film on the top of the NiOx in Figure 2a exhibits a compact and smooth film on the top of the NiOx without any pin holes. Furthermore, the energy dispersive spectrometer EDS mapping of corresponding element Cs, Pb, I and Br are homogeneously distributed throughout the perovskite film without phase separation shown in Figure 2b, confirming the full coverage of CsPbIBr2 film on the NiOx film, partially guaranteeing the high performance of the perovskite solar cells. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out to reveal the formation of CsPbIBr2 perovskite (Figure 2c). The diffraction peaks in the XRD patterns were consistent with those of [23].
The performance of device depends not only on the morphology of the film but also on the separation of exciton and the charge carrier’s mobility through the interfaces. The charge transport layers widely are employed to enhance carrier injection, decrease trap-states, and reduce contact resistance [24]. In this work, another inorganic transport material, CeOx is used as the electron transport layer (ETL) in inverted CsPbIBr2 PSCs. In order to research how the energy level align, we measured the bandgap of the CeOx layer. The Eg of CeOx film could be obtained from the UV-Vis absorbance spectrometry in Figure 3a, and which is determined to be 3.5 eV. The UPS of the CeOx film is shown in Figure 3b, and the valence band (EVB) of the CeOx film is calculated to be 7.52 eV. According to the relationship of E CB = E VB + E g , the conductive band energy level (ECB) of CeOx is calculated as 4.02 eV. Compared to the conventional ETL (PCBM), CeOx shows a better energy level match with CsPbIBr2 due to it has a lower valence band energy level, the larger driving force will facilitate the election injection and blocks the holes. At the same time, the CeOx energy level of the conductive band is slightly lower than CsPbIBr2, proving CeOx can be used as a suitable ETL for CsPbIBr2 PSCs (Figure 3c).
The conductive band energy level of CsPbIBr2 and CeOx discontinuity (ΔEc) is 0.1 eV, the valence band energy level discontinuity is 1.52 eV, which means CeOx layer can actually be an electronic transfer tunnel when the energy bands bend downwards, decreasing the energy barrier from the conductive band of perovskite absorber (Figure 3d). To further demonstrate the electron extraction mechanism, the steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and TRPL spectra were measured and are shown in Figure 3e,f This shows that the CsPbIBr2/CeOx exhibit more efficient PL quenching ability, the significantly lower PL intensity indicates a stronger interfacial electron extraction efficiency from perovskite absorber layer [25,26]. The two TRPL spectra are fitted with a bi-exponential decay function [27], and the PL decay time of glass/CsPbIBr2 are τ1 = 0.53 ns, τ2 = 3.07 ns. While that of glass/CsPbIBr2/CeOx are τ1 = 0.38 ns, τ2 = 2.58 ns. The reduction of the PL decay time indicates a more efficient electron extraction capability. Furthermore, the presence of CeOx can speed up the electron extract and increase the photovoltaic performance of the inorganic PSCs.
The contact resistance strongly depends on adhesion of contact interface and the flatness of the contact interface. To estimate the roughness of the contact interface with and without depositing CeOx film, the AFM measurements were tested (Figure 4a,b). The root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the pure perovskite was 19.17 nm, the RMS roughness of the CsPbIBr2/CeOx film was 11.86 nm, the reduced RMS roughness would be beneficial in decreasing the contact resistance after deposited CeOx layer. The water contact angle on these films is also tested (Figure 4c). The contact angle is 63.1° for the pure perovskite film, while 34.8° for the perovskite/CeOx film. A relatively good wetting property can have a better atomic adsorption compared to the non-wetting surfaces, it can also contribute to low electrical contact resistance [28].
To evaluate the influence of the metal oxide transport layers on the device performance, an inverted planar CsPbIBr2 PSCs with a configuration of ITO/NiOx/CsPbIBr2/CeOx/Ag were fabricated. The current-voltage (J-V) curve of the inorganic PSCs is shown in Figure 5a. The best power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.60% was obtained in the device with an open-circuit (Voc) of 1.01 V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 8.76 mA cm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 63.35%. The device also shows a small J-V hysteresis (Figure 5a). Figure 5b gives statistical PCEs of 24 independent cells. Average PCE is calculated to be 5.56% for all the inorganic PSCs.
The external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum of the device was measured and is shown in Figure 5c. The corresponding integrated Jsc of 8.71 mA cm−2, which is close to the Jsc derived from the J-V curve. This result indicates that the device has a better photoelectric conversion property. The stabilized power output (SPO) of the PSCs is also shown in Figure 5d, and the stabilized efficiency output is estimated to 5.54% for the solar cell after being measured for over 600 s. In addition, the PCE output is much more stable during long time measurement, indicating the inorganic materials can have a better stability.
The electrical property of these inorganic materials is investigated to determine they are better adapted to organic materials used in the PSCs. The space-charge-limited current (SCLC) measurement has been tested. We measured the electron-only devices and these are shown in the Figure 6a,b. The SCLC can be divided into three sections: ohmic regime, trap-filling regime and trap-free SCLC regime. The trap-state density (Ntrap) can be determined by the trap-filled limit voltage equation [29,30], and the Ntrap of the PCBM and CeOx ETL are 6.95 × 1016 and 3.89 × 1016 cm−3, respectively, indicating the CeOx as the ETL can reduce the trap density. The mobility of the devices is calculated using Equation [31] J = 9 ε 0 ε r μ V 2 / 8 L 2 , the mobility values of these devices are 0.39 cm2 V−1 S−1 and 1.26 cm2 V−1 S−1, respectively. This result implies the device with the CeOx exhibits more efficient electron extraction from the perovskite layer.
To further investigate the carrier transfer and recombination in the inorganic PSC, the transient photovoltage (TPV) and transient photocurrent (TPC) measurements are carried out. Figure 6d shows the photocurrent decay of the different ETL devices measured at short current condition. The CeOx-based device has faster decay than the PCBM-based device, suggesting that the CeOx-based device has a better carrier extraction and transport. The TPV is carried out to measure the charge recombination lifetime (Figure 6c). The devices with CeOx ETL demonstrates a slower photovoltage decay, indicating the charge recombination can be suppressed and lower trap density. This situation is consistent with the PL and SCLC results that improve the charge transfer and decrease the trap states in the all inorganic PSCs.
Finally, the stabilities of the devices are examined. All the devices are evaluated and the results are shown in Figure 7. These devices are stored in an atmospheric condition at 40–45 °C and humidity in the 45–50% without encapsulation.
It can be seen that the PCE of the device with the CeOx ETL can retain 90% of its initial efficiency after 500 h. Generally, the water can damage the perovskite layer and cause decomposition [32]. However, the CeOx film can protect the perovskite layer from water and has more stability in air. According to the previous report, the organic ETL is not dense enough against the water and makes the perovskite layer degenerate. In contract, the inorganic ETL can prevent the perovskite layer from water and act as a diffusion barrier to prevent the metal electrode decomposing.

4. Conclusions

In summary, cost-effective, efficient p-i-n PSCs were demonstrated with an inorganic perovskite layer sandwiched between two metal oxides transport layers. The inorganic transport layers retarded the degradation of the perovskite film and decreased the contact resistance, trap density between the interfaces of the CsPbIBr2 film and the Ag electrode effectively. Furthermore, the suitable energy alignments of the layers increased the performance of the PSCs with a Voc of 1.01 V and Jsc of 8.76 mA cm−2. The best PCE of the devices is of 5.60% with a stabilized value of 5.56%. In addition, the high-quality all inorganic PSC show a long-term endurance against the influences of heat and humidity. Therefore, the all inorganic materials involved in PSCs provide a novel approach to fabricate future cheap and stable perovskite solar cells with an expectation of practicability.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, J.Y., Q.Z., J.X.; writing—review and editing, S.C., H.L., R.Q., H.Z., M.Y.

Funding

This research was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 21402042), Tackling Key Scientific and Technological Problems of Henan Province (No. 192102210173), Research Funds of Longyan University (LB2018016), and Science and Technology Program of Longyan (No. LY2018LYF8007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NREL. Best Research Efficiencies. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 30 June 2019).
  2. Conings, B.; Drijkoningen, J.; Gauquelin, N.; Babayigit, A.; D’Haen, J.; D’Olieslaeger, L.; Ethirajan, A.; Verbeeck, J.; Manca, J.; Mosconi, E.; et al. Intrinsic Thermal Instability of Methylammonium Lead Trihalide Perovskite. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, J.; Siempelkamp, B.D.; Liu, D.; Kelly, T.L. Investigation of CH3NH3PbI3 Degradation Rates and Mechanisms in Controlled Humidity Environments Using in Situ Techniques. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1955–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beal, R.E.; Slotcavage, D.J.; Leijtens, T.; Bowring, A.R.; Belisle, R.A.; Nguyen, W.H.; Burkhard, G.F.; Hoke, E.T.; McGehee, M.D. Cesium lead halide perovskites with improved stability for tandem solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, G.-W.; Kang, G.; Malekshahi Byranvand, M.; Lee, G.-Y.; Park, T. Gradated mixed hole transport layer in a perovskite solar cell: Improving moisture stability and efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27720–27726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C.H.; Yang, R.X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M.V. Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X= Cl, Br, and I): Novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Xing, X.; Jiang, Y.; He, T.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Yang, J.; Yuan, M. Conjugated Alkylamine by Two-Step Surface Ligand Engineering in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals for Efficient Light-Emitting Diodes. ChemNanoMat 2018, 5, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shockley, W.; Queisser, H.J. Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Gao, X.; Xue, Q.; Yip, H.-L.; Fan, J.; et al. Structurally Reconstructed CsPbI2Br Perovskite for Highly Stable and Square-Centimeter All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, J.; Chang, J.; Lin, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Xi, H.; Chen, D.; Zhang, C.; Hao, Y. Elucidating the roles of TiCl4 and PCBM fullerene treatment on TiO2 electron transporting layer for highly efficient planar perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1044–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arora, N.; Dar, M.I.; Hinderhofer, A.; Pellet, N.; Schreiber, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Perovskite solar cells with CuSCN hole extraction layers yield stabilized efficiencies greater than 20%. Science 2017, 358, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gharibzadeh, S.; Nejand, B.A.; Moshaii, A.; Mohammadian, N.; Alizadeh, A.H.; Mohammadpour, R.; Ahmadi, V.; Alizadeh, A. Two-step physical deposition of a compact CuI Hole-Transport layer and the formation of an interfacial species in perovskite solar cells. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 1929–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mali, S.S.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.H.; Shim, S.E.; Hong, C.K. Nanoporous p-type NiOx electrode for pin inverted perovskite solar cell toward air stability. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 483–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmad, S.; Fu, P.; Yu, S.; Yang, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Guo, X.; Li, C. Dion-Jacobson Phase 2D Layered Perovskites for Solar Cells with Ultrahigh Stability. Joule 2019, 3, 794–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hwang, I.; Yong, K. Novel CdS hole-blocking layer for photostable perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4226–4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jiang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Ni, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiu, T.; Yuan, M.; Chen, J. Reduced-dimensional α-CsPbX3 perovskites for efficient and stable photovoltaics. Joule 2018, 2, 1356–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, Q.; Huang, S.; Wen, X.; Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A.W.Y. Hole Transport Layer Free Inorganic CsPbIBr2 Perovskite Solar Cell by Dual Source Thermal Evaporation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Subhani, W.S.; Wang, K.; Du, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, S. Interface-Modification-Induced Gradient Energy Band for Highly Efficient CsPbIBr2 Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, F.; Choy, W.C.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Cheng, J. Post-treatment-Free Solution-Processed Non-stoichiometric NiOx Nanoparticles for Efficient Hole-Transport Layers of Organic Optoelectronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2930–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.; Deng, L.-L.; Wang, L.-Y.; Dai, S.-M.; Xing, Z.; Zhan, X.-X.; Lu, X.-Z.; Xie, S.-Y.; Huang, R.-B.; Zheng, L.-S. Cerium oxide standing out as an electron transport layer for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells processed at low temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xing, Z.; Li, S.-H.; Wu, B.-S.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.-Y.; Wang, T.; Liu, H.-R.; Zhang, M.-L.; Yun, D.-Q.; Deng, L.-L.; et al. Photovoltaic performance and stability of fullerene/cerium oxide double electron transport layer superior to single one in p-i-n perovskite solar cells. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Woo, K.; Kim, Y.; Moon, J. A non-toxic, solution-processed, earth abundant absorbing layer for thin-film solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5340–5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, J.; Chen, S.-C.; Zheng, Q. Defect Passivation of CsPbIBr2 Perovskites for High-Performance Solar Cells with Large Open-Circuit Voltage of 1. 28 V. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 5872–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shrotriya, V.; Li, G.; Yao, Y.; Chu, C.W.; Yang, Y. Transition metal oxides as the buffer layer for polymer photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 073508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, B.; Chen, H.; Shuang, X.; Xue, Q.; Teng, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Qiang, L.; Chen, H.; Yun, Y.; Hu, Z. Effects of a Molecular Monolayer Modification of NiO Nanocrystal Layer Surfaces on Perovskite Crystallization and Interface Contact toward Faster Hole Extraction and Higher Photovoltaic Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 2950–2958. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Z.; Zhu, A.; Cai, F.; Tao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Qi, C.; Cheng, Y.B.; Zhou, H. Nickel oxide nanoparticles for efficient hole transport in p-i-n and n-i-p perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 6597–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, Y.; Xin, Z.; Yang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Liu, S.F.; Chang, R. Surface Optimization to Eliminate Hysteresis for Record Efficiency Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3071–3078. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bi, C.; Wang, Q.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Huang, J. Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yun, S.-C.; Ma, S.; Kwon, H.-C.; Kim, K.; Jang, G.; Yang, H.; Moon, J. Amino Acid Salt-Driven Planar Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells With Enhanced Humidity Stability. Nano Energy 2019, 59, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, W.; Shen, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, E.; Zhang, W.; Xu, X.; Wu, W.; Tian, H. Semi-Locked Tetrathienylethene as Promising Building Block for Hole Transporting Materials: Toward Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3784–3789. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cheng, R.; Chung, C.C.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Zhai, P.; Huang, Y.T.; Lee, H.; Feng, S.P. An Air Knife–Assisted Recrystallization Method for Ambient-Process Planar Perovskite Solar Cells and Its Dim-Light Harvesting. Small 2019, 15, e1804465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, J.; Chen, S.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, M. A Review on Improving the Quality of Perovskite Films in Perovskite Solar Cells via the Weak Forces Induced by Additives. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra of NiOx film deposited on glass substrate. (The inset is the plots of the (αhν)2 versus energy). (b) Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) spectra of the NiOx film deposited on the ITO substrate. (c) The band alignment between a NiOx film and perovskite film.
Figure 1. (a) Ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra of NiOx film deposited on glass substrate. (The inset is the plots of the (αhν)2 versus energy). (b) Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) spectra of the NiOx film deposited on the ITO substrate. (c) The band alignment between a NiOx film and perovskite film.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g001
Figure 2. (a) Top view scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of CsPbIBr2 film. (b) The EDS spectra. (c) X-ray diffraction (XRD) of ITO/NiOx and ITO/NiOx/CsPbIBr2. (b1–4) The EDS elemental mappings of Cs, Pb, I and Br throughout CsPbIBr2 film.
Figure 2. (a) Top view scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of CsPbIBr2 film. (b) The EDS spectra. (c) X-ray diffraction (XRD) of ITO/NiOx and ITO/NiOx/CsPbIBr2. (b1–4) The EDS elemental mappings of Cs, Pb, I and Br throughout CsPbIBr2 film.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g002
Figure 3. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of CeOx film. (The inset is plots of the (αhν)2 versus energy). (b) UPS spectra of the CeOx film. (c) The energy band diagram of the components in the device. (d) the diagram of energy bands bends downwards at the CsPbIBr2/CeOx interface. (e) The steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra. (f) The time-resolved PL spectra.
Figure 3. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of CeOx film. (The inset is plots of the (αhν)2 versus energy). (b) UPS spectra of the CeOx film. (c) The energy band diagram of the components in the device. (d) the diagram of energy bands bends downwards at the CsPbIBr2/CeOx interface. (e) The steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra. (f) The time-resolved PL spectra.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g003
Figure 4. Two-dimensional (2D) tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) height (a) ITO/CsPbIBr2. (b) ITO/CsPbIBr2/CeOx. The water contact angle: (c) ITO/CsPbIBr2. (d) ITO /CsPbIBr2/CeOx.
Figure 4. Two-dimensional (2D) tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) height (a) ITO/CsPbIBr2. (b) ITO/CsPbIBr2/CeOx. The water contact angle: (c) ITO/CsPbIBr2. (d) ITO /CsPbIBr2/CeOx.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g004
Figure 5. (a) The current-voltage (J-V) curves of perovskite solar cells measured in different scan directions. (b) Statistical power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 24 independent cells. (c) The corresponding external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum together with the integrated Jsc of the champion CsPbIBr2 PSC. (d) Steady-state maximum PCE outputs.
Figure 5. (a) The current-voltage (J-V) curves of perovskite solar cells measured in different scan directions. (b) Statistical power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 24 independent cells. (c) The corresponding external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum together with the integrated Jsc of the champion CsPbIBr2 PSC. (d) Steady-state maximum PCE outputs.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g005
Figure 6. (a) The space-charge-limited current (SCLC) plot of ITO/ TiO2/perovskite/[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) /Ag devices. (b) The SCLC plot of ITO/ TiO2/perovskite/CeOx/Ag devices. (c) The transient photovoltage (TPV) decay curves. (d) The transient photocurrent (TPC) decay curves.
Figure 6. (a) The space-charge-limited current (SCLC) plot of ITO/ TiO2/perovskite/[6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) /Ag devices. (b) The SCLC plot of ITO/ TiO2/perovskite/CeOx/Ag devices. (c) The transient photovoltage (TPV) decay curves. (d) The transient photocurrent (TPC) decay curves.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g006
Figure 7. The normalized efficiency decay of perovskite solar cells.
Figure 7. The normalized efficiency decay of perovskite solar cells.
Nanomaterials 09 01666 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, J.; Liu, H.; Qin, R.; Zhai, H.; Chen, S.; Yuan, M. All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Based on CsPbIBr2 and Metal Oxide Transport Layers with Improved Stability. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9121666

AMA Style

Yang J, Zhang Q, Xu J, Liu H, Qin R, Zhai H, Chen S, Yuan M. All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Based on CsPbIBr2 and Metal Oxide Transport Layers with Improved Stability. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(12):1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9121666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Jien, Qiong Zhang, Jinjin Xu, Hairui Liu, Ruiping Qin, Haifa Zhai, Songhua Chen, and Mingjian Yuan. 2019. "All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells Based on CsPbIBr2 and Metal Oxide Transport Layers with Improved Stability" Nanomaterials 9, no. 12: 1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9121666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop