Next Article in Journal
Steric Interference in Bilayer Graphene with Point Dislocations
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study of the Pressures and Points of Application of the Forces Exerted between Aligner and Tooth
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/nano9071011
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Visible Light Driven Heterojunction Photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O Thin Films for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants

by
Negar Dasineh Khiavi
1,†,
Reza Katal
2,†,
Saeideh Kholghi Eshkalak
3,
Saeid Masudy-Panah
4,
Seeram Ramakrishna
3,* and
Hu Jiangyong
2,*
1
Faculty of Biosciences & Medical Engineering, University Technology Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia
2
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Singapore
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore
4
Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(7), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071011
Submission received: 22 June 2019 / Revised: 12 July 2019 / Accepted: 12 July 2019 / Published: 13 July 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A high recombination rate and low charge collection are the main limiting factors of copper oxides (cupric and cuprous oxide) for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. In this paper, a high performance copper oxide photocatalyst was developed by integrating cupric oxide (CuO) and cuprous oxide (Cu2O) thin films, which showed superior performance for the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) compared to the control CuO and Cu2O photocatalyst. Our results show that a heterojunction photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O thin films could significantly increase the charge collection, reduce the recombination rate, and improve the photocatalytic activity.

1. Introduction

Rapidly increasing concentrations of organic pollutants such as pesticides, personal care products, and pharmaceuticals into different kinds of water sources have widely increased concerns over the potential impacts of these pollutants [1,2,3]. Conventional wastewater and water treatment cannot effectively remove organic pollutants due to their low biodegradability [4,5]. As a result, these pollutants are considered a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems and public health [6,7,8,9].
Different methods such as the heterogeneous photocatalytic process [10,11], heterogeneous catalytic oxidation with H2O2 [12], Fenton/photo-Fenton oxidation [13,14], ozonation [15], and UV/H2O2 treatment [16,17] can be used to destroy organic pollutants. Among these methods, the heterogeneous photocatalytic process is the most promising technique to remove organic pollutants from aqueous solutions because of its reusability, long term applicability, and low maintenance [18,19]. Due to the excellent chemical and physical characteristics of transition metal oxides, these materials are promising candidates in fabricating photocatalysts [20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Both CuO and Cu2O are considered as the most attractive photocatalysts for the photodegradation of organic pollutants due to their low fabrication cost, high optical absorption, and optimal optical bandgap for visible driven photocatalytic activity [27,28,29,30]. CuO and Cu2O are the two main types of copper oxide. CuO is an indirect bandgap semiconductor with an optical absorption depth of around 500 nm, an optical bandgap of 1.7 eV, and a carrier diffusion length of around 200 nm, while Cu2O is a direct bandgap semiconductor with an optical absorption depth of around 1000 nm, an optical bandgap of 2.1 eV, and a carrier diffusion length of around 500 nm [31,32,33,34,35].
Various methods such as spin coating, electrochemical deposition, deep coating, electron beam evaporation, and sputter deposition can be used to prepare the thin film of CuO and Cu2O. Among the different deposition methods of copper oxide, sputter deposition has the highest industrial compatibility, scalability, and repeatability [36,37,38,39,40,41].
Several studies have reported the application of CuO and Cu2O for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous media. The CuO/zeoliteX was used for the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and o-phenylenediamine under sunlight irradiation [42,43]. CuO/SiO2 was successfully used for MB degradation in a system under UV irradiation and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide [44]. In one study, the synthesis of the Cu2O/carbon nanotubes was reported, which indicated considerable photocatalytic activity in phenol degradation in an aqueous solution [45]. Katal et al. reported the preparation of a high-efficient thin CuO film by in situ thermal treatment and nanocrystal engineering that indicated superior photocatalytic activity for MB degradation under visible light irradiation [23]. The considerable reusability and stability of this photocatalyst provide a new option for thin film based photocatalysts for industrial applications [23]. In another study, the fabrication of nanocrystalline CuO thin films was performed using RF magnetron sputtering; based on some special properties of this photocatalyst including surface defects and oxygen vacancy, the CuO thin film indicated remarkable photocatalytic performance for MB degradation [46].
The significant difference between carrier diffusion length and optical absorption depth is one of the main reasons for the high recombination rate and low charge collection of both the CuO and Cu2O photocatalysts. Therefore, it is of great interest to develop a copper oxide photocatalyst in a way that reduces the recombination rate and increases the charge collection efficiency. In this paper, by integrating Cu2O and CuO thin films, we prepared a heterojunction photocatalyst CuO–Cu2O thin film with a low recombination rate and an enhanced charge collection to improve the photocatalytic activity of copper oxides.

2. Materials and Methods

All instruments (Singapore) used in this study for sample characterization were the same as those in our pervious publication [23]. Stoichiometric CuO and Cu2O targets were used to deposit thin films of Cu2O and CuO. All deposition was performed at a radio frequency sputtering power of 200 W and working pressure of 3 mTorr. Glass and fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass substrates were used to prepare the samples.
Incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) was carried out under standard light illumination of 300 W from a xenon lamp with an integrated parabolic reflector.
The photocatalytic degradation process is as completely described in our previous study [23]. A 300 W xenon lamp with a cut-off filter was used as the visible light source.

3. Results and Discussion

The cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (CS-TEM) image of the fabricated CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst is presented in Figure 1a. The overall thickness of the copper oxide photocatalyst was around 500 nm, which is similar to the carrier diffusion length of Cu2O and the optical absorption depth of CuO. In addition, the thickness of the CuO thin layer was around 200 nm, which is similar to the carrier diffusion length of CuO.
Due to the lower optical absorption of Cu2O than CuO, a greater bandgap of Cu2O (around 2.2 eV) than CuO (around 1.6 eV), and a longer carrier diffusion length of Cu2O (around 500 nm) than CuO (around 200 nm), Cu2O was deposited on top of the CuO thin films (Figure 1b). Indeed if CuO is deposited on Cu2O, the majority of carriers may recombine and cannot reach the conducting electrode, which results in the reduction in the performance of the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on top of each layer to verify the deposition of the CuO and Cu2O thin film. Figure 2 shows the Cu2p XPS spectra of the bottom layer of CuO and the top layer of Cu2O. Main XPS peaks at 933.9 eV were ascribed to the 2p3/2 peak of Cu2+, indicating the deposition of CuO [47]. Shoulder peaks at higher binding energies further confirmed the deposition of CuO, while the main XPS peak at 932.5 eV corresponded to the 2p3/2 peak of Cu+, confirming the deposition of the Cu2O thin film [48,49].
The XRD spectra of the prepared CuO–Cu2O sample was measured to further investigate the material properties of the prepared photocatalyst. Figure 3 shows the XRD spectra of the CuO–Cu2O thin films and the 500 nm CuO and Cu2O control thin films. Main XRD peaks at 36.45 and 38.76 degrees were ascribed to Cu2O(111) and CuO(111), respectively [5-667 and 5-661 JCPDS-ICDD]. As can be seen, in the CuO–Cu2O sample, both XRD peaks of Cu2O(111) and CuO(111) can be observed, indicating the existence of both kinds of copper oxides.
To investigate the impact of the integration of CuO and Cu2O on the optical properties of the fabricated photocatalyst, the optical absorption of the prepared samples was measured. Figure 4 shows the optical absorption of the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin films as well as the control CuO and Cu2O thin films with a thickness of around 500 nm. As can be seen, the integration of the Cu2O and CuO thin films improved the optical absorption. Indeed, due to the different refractive index of Cu2O (2.262) and CuO (2.654), the reflectance loss of the integrated CuO–Cu2O was significantly reduced, hence optical absorption was improved according to the Equation (1) [50]:
R(%) = (no − nm)2/(no + nm)2 × 100,
where R, nm, and no are reflectance in percentage, the refractive index of the underlying layer, and the refractive index of the top layer, respectively.
The visible light driven photocatalytic activity of the Cu2O, CuO, and CuO–Cu2O thin films were investigated by considering the MB degradation. First, the MB degradation rate without photocatalysts under light irradiation and in the presence of a photocatalyst in the dark condition was studied; the results showed no considerable MB degradation rate, which clearly demonstrated that the MB degradation could only be possible in the presence of photocatalysts and visible light irradiation. To reach the adsorption equilibrium, the photocatalysts was placed in the MB solution under the dark condition for 30 min.
By proceeding with the photocatalytic reaction, the MB concentration gradually dropped due to the degradation reaction. The MB concentration change as a function of the photocatalytic degradation time was plotted and is shown in Figure 5a. In comparison with CuO and Cu2O, the MB degradation rate by the CuO–Cu2O sample was 0.0241 min−1, which was almost twice that of the other samples. The images of the solution after degradation by CuO–Cu2O are shown in Figure 5b; as can be seen, the solution color became light. This high photocatalytic activity of the CuO/Cu2O sample can be considered as a suitable strategy for the elimination of organic pollutants from water and wastewater treatment systems at a large-scale.
The superior visible-light driven photocatalytic activity of CuO–Cu2O can be ascribed to its improved photo-generated charge carrier separation. Due to the presence of both types of copper oxides in the CuO–Cu2O sample, the interface between these two copper oxides acted as a key parameter for the separation of the photo-generated electrons and holes [51,52]. Meanwhile, based on the difference in the energy levels of their CBs and VBs [53,54,55], this led to a higher absorption of visible light.
The charge collection efficiency of the prepared samples was evaluated by measuring the IPCE characteristics at 0 V versus RHE. Figure 6 illustrates the IPCE characteristics of the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin films and the control CuO and Cu2O thin films with a thickness of 500 nm. As can be seen, the IPCE of the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film was greater than that of the CuO and Cu2O thin films over a broad range of wavelengths, indicating an improvement in the charge collection of integrated CuO–Cu2O thin films when compared to the control CuO and Cu2O samples.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to investigate the kinetics of the interfacial charge transfer of the prepared samples. The Nyquist plot of the prepared CuO–Cu2O thin film as well as those of the CuO and Cu2O control samples under standard solar illumination at the potential of 0 V vs. RHE is presented in Figure 7. The semi-circle nature of the Nyquist plot at high frequencies is indicative of the charge transfer process and the diameter of the semi-circle is indicative of the interfacial charge transfer resistance between the electrolyte and photocatalyst (Rct). As seen in Figure 7, the integration of CuO and Cu2O significantly reduced the Rct, indicating an improvement in the charge transfer, a reduction in the recombination rate, and an improvement in photocatalytic activity. The trend of the Rct values correlated well with the measured IPCE of the prepared samples.
To further investigate the impact of the integration of Cu2O and CuO on the performance of the prepared photocatalyst, linear voltammetry measurements were performed at the pH of the electrolyte of 5.2. Figure 8a,b show the photoelectrochemical (PEC) current density and the photocorrosion stability of the control CuO and Cu2O photocatalysts and the CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst, respectively. The thickness of the CuO and Cu2O control photocatalysts was set at around 500 nm (similar to the thickness of the CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst). The PEC current density was measured under dark and standard solar AM 1.5G illumination of 100 mW/cm2 (“light on”) conditions. Photocorrosion stability was measured at a potential of 0.25 V vs. RHE. Photocurrent and photocorrosion stability of a photocatalyst is generally determined by the recombination rate and charge collection efficiency. Enhanced photocurrent and photocorrosion stability of the CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst when compared to the control CuO and Cu2O photocatalysts indicates a reduction in the recombination rate and an enhancement in the separation of generated electron hole pairs. Furthermore, according to the measured PEC characteristics of the deposited CuO, Cu2O, and CuO–Cu2O thin films on FTO coated substrates, it can be concluded that fabricated electrodes behaved as photocathodes.
The CuO–Cu2O photocatalysis mechanism (based on the CB & VB) are graphically presented in Figure 9. Due to the band gap values of Cu2O (2.2 eV) and CuO (1.7 eV), both oxides have a high capacity to light absorption in the visible range and can subsequently generate a photo-generated electron-hole pair under visible light irradiation [56,57]. The band edge positions of materials in a heterojunction net strongly affect the photo-generated charge carrier transfer direction [58,59]. As shown in Figure 9, both the CB and VB of Cu2O placed below those of CuO; therefore, the photo-generated electrons transfer took place from the Cu2O transferred to the CB of CuO under visible light irradiation; whereas the photo-generated holes from CuO transferred to the VB of Cu2O [60,61]. Therefore, due to the transfer of the photo-generated electrons and holes in the CuO–Cu2O heterojunction net, a significant increase in the life-time of the photogenerated electron-hole pair was observed. O2•− and OH•, as highly oxidative radical species, were generated with the electrons captured by the adsorbed oxygen molecules and holes trapped by the surface hydroxyl, respectively.
Generally, the degradation of organic pollutants by semiconductors in aqueous environments results from reactive oxygen species (O2•−, H2O2, and OH•) and photogenerated hole (h+) generation during light irradiation. The relevant reactions can be described as follows:
CuO–Cu2O + hv → e− + h+
e− + O2 → O2•−
e− + O2•− + 2H+ → H2O2
2e− + HO2• + H+ → OH• + OH−
h+, H2O2 , O2•−, OH• + MB → products (CO2, H2O, SO4−2, NO3−, NH4+)
To investigate the role of ROSs in MB photocatalytic degradation, t-butanol (t-OH), ammonium oxalate (AO), catalase (CAT), and benzoquinone (BQ) were used as scavengers of the hydroxyl radicals (OH•), photo-generated holes (h+), H2O2, and superoxide radicals (O2•−), respectively [62]. The MB degradation efficiency by CuO–Cu2O in the presence of scavengers is shown in Figure 10. As can be seen, an obvious reduction in the photocatalytic activity of CuO–Cu2O was observed in the presence of the t-OH, BQ, and OA, which clearly showed the contribution of OH•, superoxide, and h+ in the photocatalytic degradation process. However, by adding CAT as a scavenger of H2O2, a light reduction in degradation efficiency was observed; this obviously indicates that H2O2 did not play an important role in MB degradation by CuO–Cu2O.
To evaluate the capacity of CuO–Cu2O for large-scale application, the reusability of this sample was tested for five cycles. Figure 11 presents the degradation rate from the five cycle tests. As can be seen, the degradation rate was repeatable. The reduction in photocatalytic degradation rate after five cycles was less than 5%.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, an efficient visible-light-driven heterojunction photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O thin films for the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue was fabricated. It was shown that the integration of Cu2O and CuO could significantly increase the charge collection and reduce the recombination rate inside the photocatalyst. Furthermore, it was found that integrating CuO and Cu2O could improve the optical absorption and facilitate the charge transfer at the interface between the photocatalyst and electrolyte.

Author Contributions

Synthesis and experimental design, N.D.K. and R.K.; Sample characterization, R.K., S.M.P., and S.K.E.; Concentration analysis, R.K. and S.K.E.; Supervision, S.R. and H.J.; Writing—original draft, N.D.K. and R.K.; Writing—review & editing, H.J. and S.R.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Singapore International Graduate Award (SINGA).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wu, L.; Wan, G.; Hu, N.; He, Z.; Shi, S.; Suo, Y.; Wang, K.; Xu, X.; Tang, Y.; Wang, G. Synthesis of Porous CoFe2O4 and Its Application as a Peroxidase Mimetic for Colorimetric Detection of H2O2 and Organic Pollutant Degradation. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moreno-Castilla, C.; López-Ramón, M.V.; Fontecha-Cámara, M.Á.; Álvarez, M.A.; Mateus, L. Removal of Phenolic Compounds from Water Using Copper Ferrite Nanosphere Composites as Fenton Catalysts. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, J.; Li, G.; Liu, Q.; Liang, Y.; Liu, M.; Wu, H.; Gao, W. A Photocleavable Amphiphilic Prodrug Self-Assembled Nanoparticles with Effective Anticancer Activity In Vitro. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Ma, Q.; An, M. A Facile and Flexible Approach for Large-Scale Fabrication of ZnO Nanowire Film and Its Photocatalytic Applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Long, X.; Ren, J.; Zhang, C.; Ji, F.; Jia, L. Facile and Controllable Fabrication of Protein-Only Nanoparticles through Photo-Induced Crosslinking of Albumin and Their Application as DOX Carriers. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, Y.; Qu, B.; Liu, Q.; Gao, S.; Yan, Z.; Yan, W.; Pan, B.; Wei, S.; Xie, Y. Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic activities in synthetic ordered monoclinic BiVO4 quantum tubes–graphene nanocomposites. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chang, C.-T.; Wang, J.-J.; Ouyang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Jing, Y.-H. Photocatalytic degradation of acetaminophen in aqueous solutions by TiO2/ZSM-5 zeolite with low energy irradiation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2015, 196, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, K.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.; Deng, J.; Pan, K. Fabrication of α-Fe2O3@rGO/PAN Nanofiber Composite Membrane for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1700845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kümmerer, K. Drugs in the environment: Emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources—A review. Chemosphere 2001, 45, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Calza, P.; Sakkas, V.; Medana, C.; Baiocchi, C.; Dimou, A.; Pelizzetti, E.; Albanis, T. Photocatalytic degradation study of diclofenac over aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 67, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rizzo, L.; Meric, S.; Kassinos, D.; Guida, M.; Russo, F.; Belgiorno, V. Degradation of diclofenac by TiO2 photocatalysis: UV absorbance kinetics and process evaluation through a set of toxicity bioassays. Water Res. 2009, 43, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hofmann, J.; Freier, U.; Wecks, M.; Hohmann, S. Degradation of diclofenac in water by heterogeneous catalytic oxidation with H2O2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2007, 70, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Klamerth, N.; Rizzo, L.; Malato, S.; Maldonado, M.I.; Agüera, A.; Fernández-Alba, A.R. Degradation of fifteen emerging contaminants at μgL−1 initial concentrations by mild solar photo-Fenton in MWTP effluents. Water Res. 2010, 44, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pérez-Estrada, L.A.; Maldonado, M.I.; Gernjak, W.; Agüera, A.; Fernández-Alba, A.R.; Ballesteros, M.M.; Malato, S. Decomposition of diclofenac by solar driven photocatalysis at pilot plant scale. Catal. Today 2005, 101, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vogna, D.; Marotta, R.; Napolitano, A.; Andreozzi, R.; D’Ischia, M. Advanced oxidation of the pharmaceutical drug diclofenac with UV/H2O2 and ozone. Water Res. 2004, 38, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Klavarioti, M.; Mantzavinos, D.; Kassinos, D. Removal of residual pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by advanced oxidation processes. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, I.; Yamashita, N.; Tanaka, H. Performance of UV and UV/H2O2 processes for the removal of pharmaceuticals detected in secondary effluent of a sewage treatment plant in Japan. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paracchino, A.; Laporte, V.; Sivula, K.; Grätzel, M.; Thimsen, E. Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morales-Guio, C.G.; Tilley, S.D.; Vrubel, H.; Grätzel, M.; Hu, X. Hydrogen evolution from a copper(I) oxide photocathode coated with an amorphous molybdenum sulphide catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. López, R.; Gómez, R.; Llanos, M.E. Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of nanosized copper-doped titania sol–gel catalysts. Catal. Today 2009, 148, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Katal, R.; Salehi, M.; Davood Abadi Farahani, M.H.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J. Preparation of a New Type of Black TiO2 under a Vacuum Atmosphere for Sunlight Photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 35316–35326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Masudy-Panah, S.; Eugene, Y.-J.K.; Khiavi, N.D.; Katal, R.; Gong, X. Aluminum-incorporated p-CuO/n-ZnO photocathode coated with nanocrystal-engineered TiO2 protective layer for photoelectrochemical water splitting and hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11951–11965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Katal, R.; Masudy-panah, S.; Kong, E.Y.-J.; Dasineh Khiavi, N.; Abadi Farahani, M.H.D.; Gong, X. Nanocrystal-engineered thin CuO film photocatalyst for visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant in aqueous solution. Catal. Today 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Katal, R.; Kholghi Eshkalak, S.; Masudy-panah, S.; Kosari, M.; Saeedikhani, M.; Zarinejad, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Evaluation of Solar-Driven Photocatalytic Activity of Thermal Treated TiO2 under Various Atmospheres. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Katal, R.; Masudy Panah, S.; Zarinejad, M.; Salehi, M.; Jiangyong, H. Synthesis of Self-Gravity Settling Faceted-Anatase TiO2 with Dominant {010} Facets for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Acetaminophen and Study of the Type of Generated Oxygen Vacancy in Faceted-TiO2. Water 2018, 10, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Katal, R.; Farahani, M.H.D.A.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J. Polypyrrole- and polyaniline-supported TiO2 for removal of pollutants from water. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2019, 14, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Petronella, F.; Truppi, A.; Dell’Edera, M.; Agostiano, A.; Curri, M.L.; Comparelli, R. Scalable Synthesis of Mesoporous TiO2 for Environmental Photocatalytic Applications. Materials 2019, 12, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katal, R.; Panah, S.M.; Saeedikhani, M.; Kosari, M.; Sheng, C.C.; Leong, O.S.; Xiao, G.; Jiangyong, H. Pd-Decorated CuO Thin Film for Photodegradation of Acetaminophen and Triclosan under Visible Light Irradiation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1801440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lu, Y.; Liu, X.; Qiu, K.; Cheng, J.; Wang, W.; Yan, H.; Tang, C.; Kim, J.-K.; Luo, Y. Facile Synthesis of Graphene-Like Copper Oxide Nanofilms with Enhanced Electrochemical and Photocatalytic Properties in Energy and Environmental Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 9682–9690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yin, G.; Nishikawa, M.; Nosaka, Y.; Srinivasan, N.; Atarashi, D.; Sakai, E.; Miyauchi, M. Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Copper Oxide Nanocluster-Grafted Niobate Nanosheets. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2111–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masudy-Panah, S.; Zhuk, S.; Tan, H.R.; Gong, X.; Dalapati, G.K. Palladium nanostructure incorporated cupric oxide thin film with strong optical absorption, compatible charge collection and low recombination loss for low cost solar cell applications. Nano Energy 2018, 46, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Masudy-Panah, S.; Kakran, M.; Lim, Y.-F.; Chua, C.S.; Tan, H.R.; Dalapati, G.K. Graphene nanoparticle incorporated CuO thin film for solar cell application. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2016, 8, 043507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Masudy-Panah, S.; Siavash Moakhar, R.; Chua, C.S.; Tan, H.R.; Wong, T.I.; Chi, D.; Dalapati, G.K. Nanocrystal Engineering of Sputter-Grown CuO Photocathode for Visible-Light-Driven Electrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Luo, J.; Steier, L.; Son, M.-K.; Schreier, M.; Mayer, M.T.; Grätzel, M. Cu2O Nanowire Photocathodes for Efficient and Durable Solar Water Splitting. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1848–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Musselman, K.P.; Marin, A.; Schmidt-Mende, L.; MacManus-Driscoll, J.L. Incompatible Length Scales in Nanostructured Cu2O Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2202–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dalapati, G.K.; Kajen, R.S.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Sonar, P. Defect analysis of sputter grown cupric oxide for optical and electronics application. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2015, 48, 495104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Masudy-Panah, S.; Siavash Moakhar, R.; Chua, C.S.; Kushwaha, A.; Dalapati, G.K. Stable and Efficient CuO Based Photocathode through Oxygen-Rich Composition and Au–Pd Nanostructure Incorporation for Solar-Hydrogen Production. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27596–27606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Masudy-Panah, S.; Moakhar, R.S.; Chua, C.S.; Kushwaha, A.; Wong, T.I.; Dalapati, G.K. Rapid thermal annealing assisted stability and efficiency enhancement in a sputter deposited CuO photocathode. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 29383–29390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Masudy-Panah, S.; Radhakrishnan, K.; Tan, H.R.; Yi, R.; Wong, T.I.; Dalapati, G.K. Titanium doped cupric oxide for photovoltaic application. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 140, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dalapati, G.K.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Chua, S.T.; Sharma, M.; Wong, T.I.; Tan, H.R.; Chi, D. Color tunable low cost transparent heat reflector using copper and titanium oxide for energy saving application. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dalapati, G.K.; Batabyal, S.K.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Su, Z.; Kushwaha, A.; Wong, T.I.; Liu, H.F.; Bhat, T.; Iskander, A.; Lim, Y.-F.; et al. Sputter grown sub-micrometer thick Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film for photovoltaic device application. Mater. Lett. 2015, 160, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.; Hushmandrad, S. Solar photodecolorization of methylene blue by CuO/X zeolite as a heterogeneous catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 388, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.; Salimi, Z. Solar photocatalytic degradation of o-phenylenediamine by heterogeneous CuO/X zeolite catalyst. Desalination 2011, 280, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Batista, A.P.L.; Carvalho, H.W.P.; Luz, G.H.P.; Martins, P.F.; Gonçalves, M.; Oliveira, L.C. Preparation of CuO/SiO2 and photocatalytic activity by degradation of methylene blue. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2010, 8, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lufeng, Y.; Deqing, C.; Limin, W.; Xu, W.; Junya, L. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of chrysanthemum-like Cu2O/Carbon Nanotubes nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 2502–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Khedr, M.H.; Ansari, M.S.; Hasan, P.M.Z.; Abdel-Wahab, M.S.; Farghali, A.A. RF sputtered CuO thin films: Structural, optical and photo-catalytic behavior. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2016, 81, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Balamurugan, B.; Mehta, B.R.; Shivaprasad, S.M. Surface-modified CuO layer in size-stabilized single-phase Cu2O nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 3176–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ghodselahi, T.; Vesaghi, M.A.; Shafiekhani, A.; Baghizadeh, A.; Lameii, M. XPS study of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 2730–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pauly, N.; Tougaard, S.; Yubero, F. Determination of the Cu 2p primary excitation spectra for Cu, Cu2O and CuO. Surf. Sci. 2014, 620, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, K.-C. Effective graded refractive-index anti-reflection coating for high refractive-index polymer ophthalmic lenses. Mater. Lett. 2015, 160, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, J.; Nie, X.; Shi, H.; Li, G.; An, T. Synthesis of TiO2 hollow sphere multimer photocatalyst by etching titanium plate and its application to the photocatalytic decomposition of gaseous styrene. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, F.; Feng, W.; Wei, G.; Zheng, J.; Wang, M.; Yang, W. Triangular prism-shaped p-type 6H-SiC nanowires. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, S.L.; Li, P.G.; Zhu, H.W.; Tang, W.H. Controllable synthesis and photocatalytic property of uniform CuO/Cu2O composite hollow microspheres. Powder Technol. 2012, 230, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yu, H.; Yu, J.; Liu, S.; Mann, S. Template-free Hydrothermal Synthesis of CuO/Cu2O Composite Hollow Microspheres. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 4327–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, P.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.; An, T.; Zhao, H. Controlled growth of CuO/Cu2O hollow microsphere composites as efficient visible-light-active photocatalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 521, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, Y.; Schoonen, M.A.A. The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals. Am. Mineral. 2000, 85, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Heinemann, M.; Eifert, B.; Heiliger, C. Band structure and phase stability of the copper oxides Cu2O, CuO, and CuO3. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 115111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Xu, D.; Yang, G.; Huang, H.; Nie, F.; Liu, C.; Yang, S. CuO nanostructures: Synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 60, 208–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, T.; Liu, B.; Yang, L.; Ma, X.; Li, H.; Yin, S.; Sato, T.; Sekino, T.; Wang, Y. RGO/Ag2S/TiO2 ternary heterojunctions with highly enhanced UV-NIR photocatalytic activity and stability. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 204, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.; Xu, D.; Wu, Q.; Diao, P. Cu2O/CuO Bilayered Composite as a High-Efficiency Photocathode for Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, H.; Su, Z.; Hu, S.; Yan, Y. Free-standing and flexible Cu/Cu2O/CuO heterojunction net: A novel material as cost-effective and easily recycled visible-light photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 207, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gang, X.; Xi, Z.; Wanying, Z.; Shan, Z.; Haijia, S.; Tianwei, T. Visible-light-mediated synergistic photocatalytic antimicrobial effects and mechanism of Ag-nanoparticles@chitosan–TiO2 organic–inorganic composites for water disinfection. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 170–171, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Cross-sectional TEM image and (b) band alignment of the fabricated heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalyst.
Figure 1. (a) Cross-sectional TEM image and (b) band alignment of the fabricated heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g002 550
Figure 2. Cu2p XPS spectra of the bottom layer of CuO and the top layer of Cu2O.
Figure 2. Cu2p XPS spectra of the bottom layer of CuO and the top layer of Cu2O.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the CuO–Cu2O thin films and control CuO and Cu2O thin films with a thickness of 500 nm.
Figure 3. XRD spectra of the CuO–Cu2O thin films and control CuO and Cu2O thin films with a thickness of 500 nm.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g004 550
Figure 4. Absorbance spectra of the CuO, Cu2O, and the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin films.
Figure 4. Absorbance spectra of the CuO, Cu2O, and the heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin films.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Degradation profiles of MB vs. photocatalysis process time. (b) Images of the MB solution before and after photocatalysis by CuO–Cu2O.
Figure 5. (a) Degradation profiles of MB vs. photocatalysis process time. (b) Images of the MB solution before and after photocatalysis by CuO–Cu2O.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g006 550
Figure 6. IPCE spectra of the CuO, Cu2O, and heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalysts.
Figure 6. IPCE spectra of the CuO, Cu2O, and heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalysts.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g007 550
Figure 7. Nyquist plot of the CuO, Cu2O and heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalysts.
Figure 7. Nyquist plot of the CuO, Cu2O and heterojunction CuO–Cu2O thin film photocatalysts.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g007
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) photoelectrochemical (PEC) current density and (b) photocorrosion stability of the control CuO and Cu2O photocatalysts and CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst.
Figure 8. (a) photoelectrochemical (PEC) current density and (b) photocorrosion stability of the control CuO and Cu2O photocatalysts and CuO–Cu2O photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g008
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g009 550
Figure 9. Proposed schematic illustration of the band structure related photocatalytic mechanism for the CuO–Cu2O heterojunction net.
Figure 9. Proposed schematic illustration of the band structure related photocatalytic mechanism for the CuO–Cu2O heterojunction net.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g009
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g010 550
Figure 10. Effect of scavengers on the photocatalytic activity of CuO–Cu2O.
Figure 10. Effect of scavengers on the photocatalytic activity of CuO–Cu2O.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g010
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g011 550
Figure 11. Reusability of the CuO–Cu2O sample under visible light irradiation during MB degradation.
Figure 11. Reusability of the CuO–Cu2O sample under visible light irradiation during MB degradation.
Nanomaterials 09 01011 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dasineh Khiavi, N.; Katal, R.; Kholghi Eshkalak, S.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Ramakrishna, S.; Jiangyong, H. Visible Light Driven Heterojunction Photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O Thin Films for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071011

AMA Style

Dasineh Khiavi N, Katal R, Kholghi Eshkalak S, Masudy-Panah S, Ramakrishna S, Jiangyong H. Visible Light Driven Heterojunction Photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O Thin Films for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(7):1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dasineh Khiavi, Negar, Reza Katal, Saeideh Kholghi Eshkalak, Saeid Masudy-Panah, Seeram Ramakrishna, and Hu Jiangyong. 2019. "Visible Light Driven Heterojunction Photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O Thin Films for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants" Nanomaterials 9, no. 7: 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071011

APA Style

Dasineh Khiavi, N., Katal, R., Kholghi Eshkalak, S., Masudy-Panah, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Jiangyong, H. (2019). Visible Light Driven Heterojunction Photocatalyst of CuO–Cu2O Thin Films for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Nanomaterials, 9(7), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop