Next Article in Journal
Mining and Europe’s World Heritage Cultural Landscapes
Previous Article in Journal
Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technoeconomic Assessment of Organic Halide Based Gold Recovery from Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment

1
Department of Chemical Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2021, 10(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020017
Submission received: 8 January 2021 / Revised: 16 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 20 February 2021

Abstract

Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment (WEEE) is one of the fastest growing waste streams worldwide, with significant economic value due to the precious metals contained within. Currently, only a small share of the total globally produced quantity produced is treated effectively and a large amount of valuable non-renewable resources are being wasted. Moreover, the methods currently applied in industry on a large scale are not always environmentally friendly. Thus, an economically viable and environmentally friendly method that would achieve high recovery of certain elements is sought. The objective of this paper is to assess four different organic halides as leaching agents for gold recovery from WEEE. Two of them have been previously tested (namely N-bromosuccinimide, NBS, and N-chlorosuccinimide, NCS) and have shown promising results, whereas the other two are novel and were selected due to their lower toxicity levels (trichloroisocyanuric acid, TCICA, and tribromoisocyanuric acid, TBICA). Both commercially supplied pure gold powder and WEEE dust from a recycling company were used as the gold source. Results show that from a technical standpoint, the NBS is a superior solution with both substrates, reaching 61% and 99% extraction efficiency from WEEE dust and pure gold, respectively. The other three methods recorded lower recovery efficiency (with the highest value reaching 36% for NCS, 53% for TCICA and 29% for TBICA). However, taking into account the price of gold and the expenses of the extraction process, only three of the lixiviants tested (NBS, NCS and TCICA) could be potentially profitable and viable on a larger scale.
Keywords: waste electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE); technoeconomic assessment; gold recovery; organic halides waste electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE); technoeconomic assessment; gold recovery; organic halides

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wordsworth, J.; Khan, N.; Blackburn, J.; Camp, J.E.; Angelis-Dimakis, A. Technoeconomic Assessment of Organic Halide Based Gold Recovery from Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment. Resources 2021, 10, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020017

AMA Style

Wordsworth J, Khan N, Blackburn J, Camp JE, Angelis-Dimakis A. Technoeconomic Assessment of Organic Halide Based Gold Recovery from Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment. Resources. 2021; 10(2):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wordsworth, Jamie, Nadia Khan, Jack Blackburn, Jason E. Camp, and Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis. 2021. "Technoeconomic Assessment of Organic Halide Based Gold Recovery from Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment" Resources 10, no. 2: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020017

APA Style

Wordsworth, J., Khan, N., Blackburn, J., Camp, J. E., & Angelis-Dimakis, A. (2021). Technoeconomic Assessment of Organic Halide Based Gold Recovery from Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment. Resources, 10(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10020017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop