Next Article in Journal
The Variability of Mercury Content in Bituminous Coal Seams in the Coal Basins in Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential for Citizen Science to Improve the Reach of Sanitary Inspections
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Material Footprint in Germany between 2015 and 2020 via Seasonally Decomposed Autoregressive and Exponential Smoothing Algorithms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Training Improve Sanitary Inspection Answer Agreement between Inspectors? Quantitative Evidence from the Mukono District, Uganda
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

1
Centre for Environmental Health and Engineering (CEHE), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK
2
German Environment Agency (UBA), Schichauweg 58, 12307 Berlin, Germany
3
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Malawi—The Polytechnic, Private Bag 303, Blantyre, Malawi
4
Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Kyambogo, Kyambogo Road, Kiwatule-Banda, Kampala, Uganda
5
British Geological Survey, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2020, 9(11), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110126
Submission received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 25 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drinking Water Safety Management)

Abstract

Water Safety Plan (WSP) implementation has the potential to greatly improve, commonly very challenging and resource limited, small drinking water supplies. Although slower than in urban or high-income settings, the uptake of WSPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is accelerating. Understanding the factors which will make a WSP successful will further improve efficient uptake and assist with its long-term sustainability. Based on an extensive literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISM-A) methodology, 48 publications, including case studies and guidance documentation, formed the basis of this review. These were analysed using inductive and deductive coding methods to (i) identify the success factors applicable to WSP implementation in small drinking water supplies in LMICs and (ii) to investigate which factors are more or less critical depending on the geography and level of development of the implementing country. Key challenges identified during the review process were also noted. A comparison of these success factors was made with those identified from high-income and urban settings. The three most important success factors identified are the development of technical capacity, community engagement, and monitoring and verification. Factors specific to small drinking water supplies in LMICs include support from non-government organisations, integration into existing water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) programs, simplicity, and community engagement. Certain factors, such as adaptability, the use of guidance documentation, international collaboration, the role of pilot studies, knowledge sharing, and stakeholder involvement are applicable to all WSP settings. Due to the specific challenges faced by small drinking water systems and the limited number of original research publications on this topic, this study highlights the need for further data collection and research focused on success factors in these settings. It is anticipated that the consideration of the success factors identified in this study will assist implementers in improving the uptake and long-term sustainability of WSPs in small drinking water supplies in low- and middle-income settings.
Keywords: drinking water; enabling environment; small drinking water supplies; success factor; sustainable development goals; water safety plan; water sanitation and hygiene (WASH) drinking water; enabling environment; small drinking water supplies; success factor; sustainable development goals; water safety plan; water sanitation and hygiene (WASH)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herschan, J.; Rickert, B.; Mkandawire, T.; Okurut, K.; King, R.; Hughes, S.J.; Lapworth, D.J.; Pond, K. Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Resources 2020, 9, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110126

AMA Style

Herschan J, Rickert B, Mkandawire T, Okurut K, King R, Hughes SJ, Lapworth DJ, Pond K. Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Resources. 2020; 9(11):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herschan, Jo, Bettina Rickert, Theresa Mkandawire, Kenan Okurut, Richard King, Susan J. Hughes, Dan J. Lapworth, and Katherine Pond. 2020. "Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries" Resources 9, no. 11: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110126

APA Style

Herschan, J., Rickert, B., Mkandawire, T., Okurut, K., King, R., Hughes, S. J., Lapworth, D. J., & Pond, K. (2020). Success Factors for Water Safety Plan Implementation in Small Drinking Water Supplies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Resources, 9(11), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9110126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop