Next Article in Journal
Thyroglossal Duct Cyst, a Case Report and Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Feature Paper Special Issue for Editorial Board Members (EBMs) of Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Patients at a Pulmonary Hypertension Center versus Community Centers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cutting out Cholecystectomy on Index Hospitalization Leads to Increased Readmission Rates, Morbidity, Mortality and Cost
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Level Influences Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnosis

by Uliana V. Chubykina 1, Marat V. Ezhov 1,*, Olga I. Afanasieva 2, Elena A. Klesareva 2 and Sergei N. Pokrovsky 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 14 January 2022 / Accepted: 16 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

After critically reviewing this Research Article titled "Elevated lipoprotein(a) level influences on familial hypercholesterolemia diagnosing", I detected some MINOR flaws, which determined my recommendation of “ACCEPT UNDER REVIEW”. Below please find my detailed comments.

The authors studied the impact of high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level on accuracy Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria of heterozygous Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosing, and changes in this diagnosis could lead to a reclassification of patients and, consequently, a change in the therapeutic management of the disease..

The study is well written and conducted, with well-described methodology, with minor flaws and easily corrected and appropriate for the objectives of the work. Statistical analyzes of the results obtained were well conducted.

The results obtained were very promising and the discussions were relevant to the results achieved.

  • If it is still possible, I suggest that the research be registered with some government clinical studies agency, such as ClinicalTrials.gov.
  • The authors do not describe how the classification of patients with diagnosis of heterozygous FH is made, whether there is any genetic test for this, or is it just observational.

The limitations of the study were not well pointed out and should be written in the end of the article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Interesting study not novel- see ref-3

the sample is small/

however the conception described quite well

I would expect to provide for the readers description of clinical features of the patients (XANTOMAS, CAD etc... and points for diagnosis

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop