Next Article in Journal
The Development and Initial Validation of the REST Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Tool for Assessing Fatigue in Individuals with and Without a History of Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Scoping Review of Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Antidepressants: An Association Not to Be Overlooked
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future

1
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University for Development Studies, Tamale P.O. Box TL 1350, Ghana
2
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra P.O. Box GP 4236, Ghana
3
Department of Bacteriology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box LG 581, Ghana
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diseases 2025, 13(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13010014
Submission received: 8 November 2024 / Revised: 13 December 2024 / Accepted: 27 December 2024 / Published: 14 January 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Yaws is an infectious, neglected tropical disease that affects the skin of many children and adolescents who live in poor, rural, low-income communities in humid, tropical areas of Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands. Yaws is currently endemic in at least 15 countries, but adequate surveillance data are lacking. In line with the WHO’s effort to improve early detection, diagnosis, and proper management leading to the eventual eradication of yaws, this article reviews the existing literature on yaws in Africa to highlight the epidemiological pattern, genetic variability, diagnosis modalities, treatment, and control strategies, the challenges and prospects for yaws eradication. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus databases to identify published data in line with the review objectives. Results: One hundred and eighty-eight peer-reviewed articles were identified by PubMed and Scopus, out of which thirty were eligible. The studies covered 11 African countries, with the reported prevalence ranging from 0.50% to 43.0%. Conclusions: There is a great prospect for eradication if countries capitalize on the availability of simple, inexpensive, and well-tolerated oral treatment that has proven effective, validated point-of-care diagnostic tests and new molecular tests. Countries should embark on integrated disease control efforts to increase sustainability and improve the quality of life for people living with this NTD in poor communities.

1. Introduction

Yaws is an infectious neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by a corkscrew-shaped Gram-negative bacterium Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue (TPE), a close relative of other Treponema bacteria, including those that cause syphilis. This bacterium was discovered by a physician, Castellani Aldo, in 1905 after examining scrapings from yaws lesions from patients in Sri Lanka [1] and later confirming it from lesions of a patient with yaws from Africa [2]. Yaws initially manifest as a wart-like skin tumor that later becomes lesions. The bacterium from a lesion can spread among people through direct skin contact. Many lesions might heal spontaneously without treatment due to the host’s immunity. However, the bacterium can sometimes lie dormant in the host for years. In about 10% of untreated and immunocompromised patients, reemergence can cause painful inflammation and destruction of bone and surrounding tissue, leading to disfigurement and eventual disability [3,4]. The nature of this chronic, disfiguring, and debilitating childhood infectious neglected tropical disease could be disturbing as it has the potential to curtail the education of affected children and limit social inclusiveness [4].
Yaws is considered endemic in humid, tropical areas of Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands and affects the skin of children under 15 years who live in poor, rural, and low-income communities [4,5]. The WHO and UNICEF’s first significant yaws eradication effort occurred from 1952 to 1964. The strategy was a mass treatment campaign in 46 countries [3,6,7], where more than 50 million cases out of the 300 million people screened received treatment with benzathine penicillin [6,8]. The campaign caused about a 95% reduction in the global burden of yaws [6]. By the end of the 1970s, yaws had re-emerged in Africa due to the integration of yaws eradication activities into national public health systems, lack of focus on yaws, failed surveillance, and low commitment towards yaws eradication [9,10]. Lack of governmental commitment and resources to reach endemic communities were also seen as the major contributor to failed surveillance and reduced commitment in most countries [10]. Also, the intramuscular benzathine penicillin injection was not well tolerated by most children who are the burden bearers of yaws. In 2012, results from randomized non-inferiority clinical trials conducted in Ghana and Papua New Guinea showed that a single oral dose of azithromycin (30 mg/kg) was effective and non-inferior to intramuscular benzathine penicillin and was well tolerated [11,12]. Based on these findings, azithromycin became the WHO-preferred treatment for yaws [13]. The WHO developed the “Morges Strategy”, which was based on total community treatment (TCT) as well as case finding and targeted treatment with azithromycin to eradicate yaws [13]. Subsequently, in 2014, Ayove, et al. [14] showed that the sensitivity of a point-of-care immunoassay, the Dual Path Platform (DPP) syphilis assay, was accurate enough to detect antibodies to treponemal and non-treponemal antigens in patients with yaws. This immunoassay is used to guide antibiotics usage for yaws eradication.
Despite the success, challenges such as a lack of resources to reach and treat people in remote areas and to monitor the disease [15] and several uncertainties related to the biology and epidemiology of yaws [4,7,16] can cause a rollback. In line with the WHO’s effort to improve early detection, diagnosis, and proper management leading to the eventual eradication of yaws by 2030, this article reviews the existing literature on yaws in Africa, to highlight the epidemiological pattern, genetic variability, diagnosis modalities, treatment, and control strategies, the challenges and prospects for yaws eradication.

2. Materials and Methods

Peer-reviewed articles focused on yaws epidemiology (prevalence, incidence, and regional distribution), genetic variability, diagnosis modalities, and treatment and control strategies were reviewed based on the objectives of this review. Article hunts were categorized into (1) a search plan, (2) selection of relevant articles, (3) charting the article selection process, and (4) summarizing the major findings of selected articles in a tabular form. This study was not registered on any platform.

2.1. Search Plan

Well-established databases, including PubMed and Scopus, were explored for relevant articles using constructed Boolean search strings for each objective. “Yaws” OR “treponematosis” AND “prevalence” OR “eradication programme” OR “antibiotic resistance” OR “diagnostic methods” OR “genetics”. Specific search strings were formulated to capture articles relevant to each objective. Additional filters were applied to eliminate review articles. Titles and abstracts of articles were reviewed to assess their relevance. Full-text articles for relevant studies were retrieved and managed using EndNote Reference Manager. Additionally, references to relevant articles were reviewed to identify more pertinent literature. The scope of article selection captures published peer-reviewed articles, experimental studies, clinical trials, and preclinical studies. Studies related to yaws in Africa were captured using guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).

2.2. Selection of Relevant Articles

Articles included were those published between 1990 and 2024. First, two individuals screened the titles and abstracts, and articles that met the inclusion criteria were considered for review. A third reviewer resolved discrepancies. The inclusion criteria were full peer-reviewed articles written in English, focusing on yaws in Africa. The excluded articles were those written in languages other than English or those without full articles. The PRISMA flow chart in Figure 1 shows the procedural selection of relevant articles.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

The following information was extracted from the articles which met the inclusion criteria: author/authors’ name, year of publication, study type, study focus, study location, and significant study findings. Findings were organized according to key themes, and gaps in the literature were identified for future research that addressed potential limitations of the existing literature. The results of this review are presented in six subheadings: (1) an overview of selected studies; (2) prevalence, incidence, and distribution of yaws in Africa; (3) diagnosis of yaws; (4) genetic variability of T. pallidum subsp. pertenue; (5) treatment and antibiotic resistance; and (6) control strategies of yaws in Africa and associated challenges.

3.2. Overview of Selected Studies

With our search criteria, 188 peer-reviewed articles were identified from PubMed and Scopus. A summary of a detailed review of 30 eligible articles is presented in Table 1. The studies covered 11 countries in Africa, including Benin [17], Burkina Faso [17], Cameroon, Central Africa Republic (CAR) [18,19,20], Congo [21,22], Côte d’Ivoire [23], Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [22], Ghana [10,24,25], Liberia [26], Nigeria [27,28], and Togo [29]. Eight studies were community-based [17,19,21,22,23,24,26,28], while three were school-based [10,18,21]. Two studies combined community and school-based [27,29] approaches, and one was hospital-based [25].

3.3. Objectives-Based Analysis of the Results

3.3.1. Prevalence, Incidence, and Distribution of Yaws in Africa

The results of the thirteen (13) studies that were found eligible showed the prevalence of yaws ranging between 0.50% and 43.0% [10,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], except for one study conducted in Nigeria that recorded no yaws cases [27]. In Ghana, studies into the prevalence of yaws were conducted in the following regions: Eastern, Central, Volta, Western, Ashanti, and Brong-Ahafo [24,25]. In Cote d’Ivoire, studies covered the entire country [23] (Table 1).
Five studies [26,30,31,32,33] reported the incidence of yaws in studies conducted in health facilities (Table 2).

3.3.2. Diagnosis of Yaws

Diagnosing yaws is performed clinically, serologically, or using molecular methods. In two studies reviewed, patients were diagnosed solely on clinical symptoms [10,28]. In nine studies, suspected cases with clinical signs of yaws were further tested serologically using VDRL, TPHA, RPR, and DPP tests [17,18,19,21,22,23,25,26,27]. Two studies conducted in Ghana used molecular methods [24,25].

3.3.3. Genetic Variability of T. pallidum Subsp. pertenue

One study from Liberia used whole genome sequencing to characterize T. pallidium subsp. pertenue [26] identified extremely closely related monophyletic clades different from those found in the TPE genome from humans and nonhuman primates [34]. Marks, et al. [35] used the new generation sequencing (NGS) method in their phylogenetic analysis to demonstrate that T. pallidum subsp. pertenue strains from the Solomon Islands and Ghana form a discrete lineage that can be further subdivided into two distinct clades, both of which are distinct from all previously sequenced T. pallidum subsp. pertenue samples. Again, three recombinant genomic regions were identified. Region 1 included the TPESAMD_0134 gene predicted to encode a putative outer member protein. Region 2 was predicted to encode ten genes and two gene remnants, including tp0858. Region 3 encompassed the tprK gene, known in T. pallidum subsp. pallidum to undergo antigenic variation via segmental gene conversion [35]. In another study conducted in Ghana and Vanuatu, nine strain types (3q12/ah, 4r12/ah, 4q10/j, 4q11/ah, 4q12/ah, 4q12/v, 4q13/ah, 6q10/aj, and 9q10/ai) were identified in clinical samples from Ghana [34] (Table 3).

3.3.4. Treatment of Yaws and Antibiotic Resistance in Africa

In terms of treatment, a randomized non-inferiority trial conducted in Ghana compared the efficacy of a single oral dose of azithromycin as an alternative to intramuscular benzathine penicillin for the treatment of yaws and concluded that azithromycin could be used for mass drug administration in resource-limited settings [12]. Following this trial, Abdulai, et al. [36] piloted a community-based mass treatment with azithromycin to eliminate yaws in Ghana, reducing the prevalence of serologically confirmed active yaws from 5.7% to 0.6%. Subsequently, in a randomized non-inferiority trial in Ghana and Papua New Guinea, Marks, et al. [37] conducted a study comparing the efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose azithromycin for patients with yaws. They found that low-dose azithromycin did not meet the prespecified non-inferiority margin compared with standard-dose azithromycin in achieving clinical and serological cure in PCR-confirmed active yaws that 20 mg/kg of azithromycin is probably effective against yaws. From the data retrieved, only twelve studies stated the treatment regimen used after confirming suspected yaws cases. Six studies [17,18,19,20,25,38] used azithromycin for all confirmed cases, while six other studies used benzathine penicillin [10,22,23,25,28,39].
In Liberia, a report from in silico analysis predicted no resistance to the macrolide based on the analysis of the resistance loci A2058G and A2059G in the 23S ribosomal regions previously reported for syphilis or yaws [26]. So far, no data in Africa show any evidence of macrolide resistance in T. pallidum subsp. pertenue.

3.3.5. Control Strategies of Yaws in Africa

Since the publication of the “Morges strategy” for the global eradication of yaws, a pilot implementation was conducted in the Abamkrom sub-district of Ghana, where 89% of the 16,287 people received a single oral dose of azithromycin [13,36]. Recently, the first significant implementation has been conducted in the Central Africa region, specifically in the Congo Basin, which 1,530,014 people inhabit [40]. The adoption of the strategy across Africa, especially in known endemic countries, remains limited [41].
Table 1. Prevalence and distribution of yaws in Africa.
Table 1. Prevalence and distribution of yaws in Africa.
CountryReferenceYear of StudyLocationStudy
Population *
Cases (Sample Size)Diagnostic MethodPrevalence, %Active/Latent
Burkina Faso[17]2018Bagré and KompiengaCommunity28 (413)RPR and TPHA6.08active
Cameroon[38]2023Eastern region and Southern regionCommunity, school children,(18/210)RDT and DPP8.6Active
Central African Republic[18]2020BaAka PygmySchool children494Clinical38.7active
Central African Republic[18]2020BantuSchool children235Clinical43.00active
Central African Republic[19]2020MbaïkiCommunity41 (1967)RPR and TPHA2.08active
Central African Republic[39]1990LobayeSchool children42 (213)VDRL and TPHA19.72latent
Central African Republic[39]1990LobayeSchool children12 (213)VDRL and TPHA5.63active
Côte d’Ivoire[23]2004AdzopéCommunity11 (2182)RPR0.50active
Côte d’Ivoire,[38]2023Haaut sassandra, Béliér, Loh Djiboua, Agneby TiassaCommunity, school children,(84/1232)RDT and DPP6.8%active
Democratic Republic of the Congo[22]2005WasoloCommunity56 (1176)RPR and TPHA4.76active
Ghana[24]2019Oti regioncommunity10 (101)PCR10.85active
Ghana[25]2021Ashanti regionHospital19/110DPP and PCR17.3active
Ghana[10]2008Eastern RegionSchool children4006 (208,413)Clinical1.92active
Ghana[38]2023Central region, Western region, and Eastern regionCommunity and school(440/1643)RDT and DPP26.8%active
Liberia[26]2018Maryland CountyCommunity24 (1000)Serological (DPP)2.6active
Nigeria[27]2021Old NsukkaCommunity and school0 (7706)RDT0active
Nigeria[28]1998GarkidaCommunity64 (1523)Clinical4.20active
Republic of Congo[21]2012Bétou, EbyelléCommunity183 (6215)RDT2.94active
Togo[29]2021NdjéiCommunity and school16 (1401)Clinical1.10active
* Study population here denotes whether the study was conducted among members of a community or school children. VDRL = Venereal Disease Research Laboratory; TPHA = Treponema Pallidum Hemagglutination; RPR = Rapid Plasma region; RDT = Rapid Diagnostic Tests; DPP = Dual Path Platform; PCR = Polymerase chain reaction.
Table 2. Characteristics of studies on the incidence of Yaws.
Table 2. Characteristics of studies on the incidence of Yaws.
CountryReferenceYear of StudyLocationPopulationMethodPositive Cases (Number Screened)Incidence
Côte d’Ivoire[30]2000countrywideadults and childrenClinical9212 (15,882,758)0.58
Côte d’Ivoire[31]2011countrywideadults and childrenClinical3343 (22,594, 212)0.15
Liberia[26]2018countrywideadults and childrenPCR3750 (3,787,000)2.60
Nigeria[32]1999–2001Countrywideadults and childrenSerology0(2871)0.00
Togo[32]1991Nationwideschool childrenClinical3750 (3787,000)0.99
Table 3. Characteristics of genetic variability studies of yaws.
Table 3. Characteristics of genetic variability studies of yaws.
Country (Reference)Year of StudyStudy ObjectiveMajor Outcome
Liberia [26]20181. Used whole genome sequencing to characterize Treponema pallidium subsp. pertenue which identified an extremely closely related monophyletic clade different from those available in TPE genome form Humans and Nonhuman primates.1. Liberia genomes form a monophyletic clade, genetically distant from publicly available genomes including three isolated from nonhuman primates in nearby Taï National Park (Côte d’Ivoire).
2. No Azithromycin resistance in the country. In silico analysis predicted no resistance based on the analysis of the resistance loci A2058G and A2059G in the 23S ribosomal regions previously reported for syphilis or yaws
Ghana and Solomon Island [35]2013 and 2014To employ next-generation sequencing to explore the reasons why T. pallidum subsp. pertenue was not detected using the 2015 CDC real-time PCR assay in samples from patients showing clinical and serological evidence of yaws, and to develop a modified assay capable of detecting these missed samples.1. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that T. pallidum subsp. pertenue strains from the Solomon Islands form a discrete lineage that can be further subdivided into two distinct clades, both of which are distinct from all previously sequenced T. pallidum subsp. pertenue samples.
2. Identified three recombinant genomic regions. Region 1 included the TPESAMD_0134 gene predicted to encode a putative outer member protein.). Region 2 was predicted to encode 10 genes and 2 gene remnants, including tp0858. Region 3 encompassed the tprK gene, which is known in T. pallidum subsp. pallidum to undergo antigenic variation via segmental gene conversion
Ghana and Vanuatu [34]2018To develop a three-gene multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for TPE, and find markers that may be useful for molecular distinction of TPE strainsA total of twenty-two complete strain types were identified; two strain types in clinical samples from Vanuatu (5q11/ak and 5q12/ak), nine strain types in clinical samples from Ghana (3q12/ah, 4r12/ah, 4q10/j, 4q11/ah, 4q12/ah, 4q12/v, 4q13/ah, 6q10/aj, and 9q10/ai), and twelve strain types in laboratory strains and published genomes (2q11/ae, 3r12/ad, 4q11/ad, 4q12/ad, 4q12/ag, 4q12/v, 5r12/ad, 6r12/x, 6q11/af, 10q9/r, 10q12/r, and 12r12/w).

4. Discussion

A limited number of studies in the endemic countries show that yaws eradication in Africa needs more attention. Our review highlights a prevalence ranging from 0.50% to 43.0% in 11 African countries. Underreporting and underestimation result in data limitations, as the actual cases are predominant in hard-to-reach rural areas with limited or no access to health facilities. Secondly, this could be because of the need for more training of health personnel to identify and report cases. The weakness of the data arising from the limitations of the studies selected for review suggests a need for more research into yaws endemicity in the African region.
Yaws can be diagnosed when patients present with clinical signs and symptoms associated with the disease, and it is often augmented with serological testing, which employs the use of combined treponemal assay, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA) and a non-treponemal assay, rapid plasma regain assay (RPR) [42]. While clinical and serological diagnosis of yaws has brought much progress towards eradication, these methods have yet to be definitive and must be supported by laboratory diagnostics [35,38,43]. Fortunately, newer point-of-care treponemal and non-treponemal assays have increasingly taken on the role of traditional lab-based assays [14,42,44]. However, although treponemal tests are more specific, they remain positive for life [37]. Recently, diagnosis by clinical examination may be challenging because the lesions can resemble several other tropical skin diseases [45]. For example, ulcerative skin lesions like that caused by Haemophilus ducreyi to that seen in early yaws lesions [46,47] complicate diagnosis as serological testing does not provide a differential diagnosis [42]. Patients who were serologically diagnosed negative for yaws were diagnosed positive using PCR [44]. Again, molecular methods have been employed to differentiate between latent and active yaws. In some cases, patients diagnosed with active yaws have been molecularly diagnosed as latent, and those thought to be yaws were caused by different organisms [35,44]. In this review, only two studies combined clinical, serological, and molecular detection by PCR [24,25]. Hence, countries that have employed clinical and serological diagnosis over the years can improve surveillance by using PCR and mapping to track progress towards eradication.
Penicillin-based treatment (PBT) was the earliest treatment regimen that the WHO recommended [8,48] and was used in many eradication campaigns, achieving up to 98% reduction in global yaws prevalence [8,9,44]. Despite the success brought by the PBT, logistical challenges such as a secured cold chain and accessories and trained health professionals to administer injections created a barrier to eradication efforts in yaws endemic settings [3,15,16] led to the introduction of oral azithromycin, following studies conducted in Papua New Guinea [11] and in Ghana [12]. These studies showed that a single dose of azithromycin at 30 mg/kg had the same efficacy as a single dose of injectable benzathine penicillin, supporting WHO policy for the use of azithromycin for yaws eradication in resource-constrained communities [37]. Hence, the WHO suggested the use of the “Morges strategy” for yaws eradication that employs the use of azithromycin for mass drug administration (MDA) in two different ways: an initial round of total community treatment (TCT) and a subsequent MDA or to switch to a strategy of treating active cases and their contacts (total targeted treatment, TTT) [13]. Using the approach in Papua New Guinea’s endemic island has shown significant progress; however, individuals absent during mass treatment had yaws reactivated [49]. This review revealed that adopting the recommended approach, especially in endemic countries in western Africa, is yet to be considered. To achieve the complete interruption of yaws transmission, stakeholders must support endemic countries to implement the approach for achieving a successful TCT developed and employed in the Congo Basin [40].
The limited reliability of clinical diagnosis of yaws and the recognition that other organisms can cause clinically similar skin lesions in yaws-endemic countries [46,47] cause problems in clinical case reporting. It is essential to quickly strategize to integrate yaws into a comprehensive diagnostic scheme, such as point-of-care serological tests and new molecular tests [50]. Another challenge to disrupting yaws transmission is the need for epidemiological data [15]. Currently, there are nine African countries: Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Liberia, Congo, Democratic Republic Congo and Togo known to be endemic [51]. Improving this situation will require a significant increase in the scale and speed of mapping to strengthen epidemiological data and inform decisions about the interventions and resources necessary for a successful eradication effort to yield the needed benefit [15]. Again, recently, treatment failure has been reported in the Pacific region, where the “Morges strategy” was employed [49], and the report showed macrolide resistance mediated by point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene [52,53,54], which was associated with prior exposure to other macrolides [49,55]. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the current state of macrolide resistance, and efforts should be made to combat this emerging resistance. Regular surveillance to monitor the effectiveness of the treatment strategies in endemic countries will be crucial for yaws elimination.

5. Conclusions

The recommended strategies and diagnostic tools adopted by the WHO show promising guidelines for eradicating yaws. With government sponsorship and support, previously endemic countries like India and Ecuador have successfully eliminated yaws. The remaining endemic countries may capitalize on the simple, cheap, and well-tolerated oral treatment that has proven effective, point-of-care diagnostic tests that can enable an initial identification of potential yaws cases and new molecular tests that have become available. These endemic countries should harness the increased interest and support within the academia and global health communities for yaws eradication efforts and increase governmental support for greater research output related to yaws. In addition, control programs in endemic countries should increase advocacy to transmit to the broader public health community the need to eliminate such neglected tropical diseases. These programs can benefit from the knowledge and experience of past yaws campaigns and other international NTD control initiatives. There is still an excellent prospect for eradication if countries embark on integrated disease control efforts to increase sustainability and improve the quality of life for people living with this NTD in poor communities.

6. Limitations

This study was limited to Africa and did not provide a global perspective. Additionally, the data used in the review did not include data on specific countries’ national control programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.D. and E.K.V. Methodology, E.K.V., S.V.S. and G.I.M. Writing: reviewing and editing: E.K.V., S.V.S., E.S.D., G.I.M. and K.K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The publication was paid for by Afrique-One Research Excellence for Africa Health Challenge (Afrique-One REACH). E.K.V. is a fellow of Afique One -REACH and supported by the Science for Africa Foundation [Afrique One-ASPIRE, Del-15-008, and Afrique One-REACH, Del-22-011] with support from Wellcome Trust and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and is part of the EDCTP2 program supported by the European Union. For purposes of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Castellani, A. On the presence of spirochaetes in some cases of parangi (yaws, framboesia tropica) preliminary note. J. Ceylon Branch Br. Med. Assoc. 1905, 2, 54. [Google Scholar]
  2. Castellani, A. Note on the spirochaete of yaws (Spirochaeta pertenuis). Br. Med. J. 1907, 2, 1511–1512. [Google Scholar]
  3. Asiedu, K.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Jannin, J. Eradication of yaws: Historical efforts and achieving WHO’s 2020 target. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marks, M.; Mitjà, O.; Solomon, A.W.; Asiedu, K.B.; Mabey, D.C. Yaws. Br. Med. Bull. 2015, 113, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mitjà, O.; Asiedu, K.; Mabey, D. Yaws. Lancet 2013, 381, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stamm, L.V. Yaws: 110 years after Castellani’s discovery of Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kazadi, W.M.; Asiedu, K.B.; Agana, N.; Mitjà, O. Epidemiology of yaws: An update. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014, 6, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antal, G.M.; Causse, G. The control of endemic treponematoses. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1985, 7 (Suppl. 2), S220–S226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asiedu, K.; Amouzou, B.; Dhariwal, A.; Karam, M.; Lobo, D.; Patnaik, S.; Meheus, A. Yaws eradication: Past efforts and future perspectives. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008, 86, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Agana-Nsiire, P.; Kaitoo, E.; Agongo, E.E.A.; Bonsu, G.; Kyei-Faried, S.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Ahmed, K.; Appiah-Denkyira, E.; Asiedu, K.; Amankwa, J.; et al. Yaws Prevalence, Lessons from the Field and the Way Forward towards Yaws Eradication in Ghana. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 910937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mitjà, O.; Hays, R.; Ipai, A.; Penias, M.; Paru, R.; Fagaho, D.; de Lazzari, E.; Bassat, Q. Single-dose azithromycin versus benzathine benzylpenicillin for treatment of yaws in children in Papua New Guinea: An open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet 2012, 379, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kwakye-Maclean, C.; Agana, N.; Gyapong, J.; Nortey, P.; Adu-Sarkodie, Y.; Aryee, E.; Asiedu, K.; Ballard, R.; Binka, F. A Single Dose Oral Azithromycin versus Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin for the Treatment of Yaws-A Randomized Non Inferiority Trial in Ghana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eradication of Yaws—The Morges Strategy. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer8720 (accessed on 24 August 2023).
  14. Ayove, T.; Houniei, W.; Wangnapi, R.; Bieb, S.V.; Kazadi, W.; Luke, L.N.; Manineng, C.; Moses, P.; Paru, R.; Esfandiari, J.; et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid point-of-care test for active yaws: A comparative study. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, e415–e421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marks, M.; Mitjà, O.; Vestergaard, L.S.; Pillay, A.; Knauf, S.; Chen, C.Y.; Bassat, Q.; Martin, D.L.; Fegan, D.; Taleo, F.; et al. Challenges and key research questions for yaws eradication. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 1220–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Stamm, L.V. Yaws: Renewed hope for eradication. JAMA Dermatol. 2014, 150, 933–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeba Lompo, S.; Barogui, Y.; Compaore, J.; Ouedraogo, Y.; Kafando, C.; Kambire-Diarra, M.C. An integrated assessment of leprosy, Buruli ulcer, and yaws around the irrigated perimeters of Bagré and Kompienga in Burkina Faso. Med. Sante Trop. 2019, 29, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bylicka-Szczepanowska, E.; Korzeniewski, K.; Pokorna-Kałwak, D. Yaws in Pygmy and Bantu children inhabiting the rural zones of Central Africa. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2022, 39, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Piamale, G.; Bohy-Ngombet, R.G.Z.; Doyama-Woza, R.H.; Fandema, E.; Pamatika, C.M.; Dombeti, C.J.; Diemer, H.S.C.; Longo, J.D.; Gresenguet, G. Prospecting for yaws in the Mbaïki Health District in the Central African Republic. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2023, 45, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taleo, F.; Macleod, C.K.; Marks, M.; Sokana, O.; Last, A.; Willis, R.; Garae, M.; Bong, A.; Chu, B.K.; Courtright, P.; et al. Integrated Mapping of Yaws and Trachoma in the Five Northern-Most Provinces of Vanuatu. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coldiron, M.; Obvala, D.; Mouniaman-Nara, I.; Pena, J.; Blondel, C.; Porten, K. [The prevalence of yaws among the Aka in the Congo]. Med. Sante Trop. 2013, 23, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gerstl, S.; Kiwila, G.; Dhorda, M.; Lonlas, S.; Myatt, M.; Ilunga, B.K.; Lemasson, D.; Szumilin, E.; Guerin, P.J.; Ferradini, L. Prevalence study of yaws in the Democratic Republic of Congo using the lot quality assurance sampling method. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Konan, Y.E.; M’Bea, K.J.; Coulibaly, A.; Tetchi, E.O.; Kpébo, D.O.; Aké, O.; Angbo-Effi, O.; Gohou-Kouassi, V.; Konan, K.M.; Assi, P.; et al. A description of the yaws infection and prevention conditions in the health district of Adzopé. Sante Publique 2007, 19, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Akuffo, R.A.; Sanchez, C.; Amanor, I.; Amedior, J.S.; Kotey, N.K.; Anto, F.; Azurago, T.; Ablordey, A.; Owusu-Antwi, F.; Beshah, A.; et al. Endemic infectious cutaneous ulcers syndrome in the Oti Region of Ghana: Study of cutaneous leishmaniasis, yaws and Haemophilus ducreyi cutaneous ulcers. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0292034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Boaitey, Y.A.; Owusu-Ofori, A.; Anyogu, A.; Aghakhanian, F.; Arora, N.; Parr, J.B.; Bosshard, P.P.; Raheem, S.; Gerbault, P. Prevalence of yaws and syphilis in the Ashanti region of Ghana and occurrence of H. ducreyi, herpes simplex virus 1 and herpes simplex virus 2 in skin lesions associated with treponematoses. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0295088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Timothy, J.W.S.; Beale, M.A.; Rogers, E.; Zaizay, Z.; Halliday, K.E.; Mulbah, T.; Giddings, R.K.; Walker, S.L.; Thomson, N.R.; Kollie, K.K.; et al. Epidemiologic and Genomic Reidentification of Yaws, Liberia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 1123–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ekeke, N.; Iyama, F.S.; Chukwu, J.N.; Asiedu, K.; Marks, M.; Omotowo, B.; Agwu-Umahi, O.; Nvene, V.O.; Paul, S.; Nwafor, C.C.; et al. Is there still yaws in Nigeria? Active case search in endemic areas of southern Nigeria. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0011753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Akogun, O.B. Yaws and syphilis in the Garkida area of Nigeria. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. 1999, 289, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saka, B.; Kassang, P.; Gnossike, P.; Head, M.G.; Akakpo, A.S.; Teclessou, J.N.; Elegbede, Y.M.; Mouhari-Toure, A.; Mahamadou, G.; Tevi, K.; et al. Prevalence of skin Neglected Tropical Diseases and superficial fungal infections in two peri-urban schools and one rural community setting in Togo. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Touré, B.; Koffi, N.M.; Assi, K.P.; Ake, O.; Konan, D.J. Yaws in Côte d’lvoire: Health problem forgotten and neglected. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 2007, 100, 130–132. [Google Scholar]
  31. Konan, D.J.; Aka, J.; Yao, K.J.; Kouassi-Gohou, V.; Yao, K.E.; Faye-Kette, H. Update on a neglected tropical disease from the routine health information system in Côte d’Ivoire: Yaws, 2001 to 2011. Med. Sante Trop. 2013, 23, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nnoruka, E.N. Skin diseases in south-east Nigeria: A current perspective. Int. J. Dermatol. 2005, 44, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Edorh, A.A.; Siamevi, E.K.; Adanlete, F.A.; Aflagah, E.K.; Kassankogno, Y.; Amouzou, A.B.; Lodonou, K.G. Resurgence of endemic yaws in Togo. Cause and eradication approach. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1994, 87, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Katz, S.S.; Chi, K.H.; Nachamkin, E.; Danavall, D.; Taleo, F.; Kool, J.L.; Addo, K.K.; Ampofo, W.; Simpson, S.V.; Ye, T.; et al. Molecular strain typing of the yaws pathogen, Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Marks, M.; Fookes, M.; Wagner, J.; Butcher, R.; Ghinai, R.; Sokana, O.; Sarkodie, Y.A.; Lukehart, S.A.; Solomon, A.W.; Mabey, D.C.W.; et al. Diagnostics for Yaws Eradication: Insights From Direct Next-Generation Sequencing of Cutaneous Strains of Treponema pallidum. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Abdulai, A.A.; Agana-Nsiire, P.; Biney, F.; Kwakye-Maclean, C.; Kyei-Faried, S.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Simpson, S.V.; Bonsu, G.; Ohene, S.A.; Ampofo, W.K.; et al. Community-based mass treatment with azithromycin for the elimination of yaws in Ghana-Results of a pilot study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marks, M.; Mitjà, O.; Bottomley, C.; Kwakye, C.; Houinei, W.; Bauri, M.; Adwere, P.; Abdulai, A.A.; Dua, F.; Boateng, L.; et al. Comparative efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose azithromycin for patients with yaws: A randomised non-inferiority trial in Ghana and Papua New Guinea. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e401–e410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tchatchouang, S.; Basing, L.A.; Kouadio-Aboh, H.; Handley, B.L.; G-Beiras, C.; Amanor, I.; Ndzomo, P.; Bakheit, M.; Becherer, L.; Knauf, S.; et al. An integrated active case detection and management of skin NTDs in yaws endemic health districts in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2024, 18, e0011790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hervé, V.; Kassa Kelembho, E.; Normand, P.; Georges, A.; Mathiot, C.; Martin, P. Resurgence of yaws in Central African Republic. Role of the Pygmy population as a reservoir of the virus. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1992, 85, 342–346. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tabah, E.N.; Boock, A.U.; Djam, C.A.; Aloumba, G.A.; Bernard, B.; Tsago, N.C.; Nformi, I.N.; Pagning, L.D.; Baran-A-Bidias, E.; Kouayep-Watat, C.E.; et al. The Morges Strategy for Yaws Eradication: The first largescale Total Community Treatment with azithromycin against yaws in the Congo-Basin, using a novel model. medRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tchatchouang, S. Eradicating yaws in Africa: Challenges and progress. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marks, M.; Goncalves, A.; Vahi, V.; Sokana, O.; Puiahi, E.; Zhang, Z.; Dalipanda, T.; Bottomley, C.; Mabey, D.; Solomon, A.W. Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for yaws infection in a community surveillance setting. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kositz, C.; Butcher, R.; Marks, M. New Diagnostics for Yaws. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 96, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Marks, M. Advances in the treatment of yaws. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mitjà, O.; Šmajs, D.; Bassat, Q. Advances in the diagnosis of endemic treponematoses: Yaws, bejel, and pinta. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marks, M.; Chi, K.H.; Vahi, V.; Pillay, A.; Sokana, O.; Pavluck, A.; Mabey, D.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Solomon, A.W. Haemophilus ducreyi associated with skin ulcers among children, Solomon Islands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1705–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mitjà, O.; Lukehart, S.A.; Pokowas, G.; Moses, P.; Kapa, A.; Godornes, C.; Robson, J.; Cherian, S.; Houinei, W.; Kazadi, W.; et al. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers in children from a yaws-endemic area of Papua New Guinea: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, e235–e241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Perine, P.L.; Hopkins, D.R.; Niemel, P.L.; St John, R.; Causse, G.; Antal, G.; World Health Organization. Handbook of Endemic Treponematoses: Yaws, Endemic Syphilis and Pinta; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mitjà, O.; Godornes, C.; Houinei, W.; Kapa, A.; Paru, R.; Abel, H.; González-Beiras, C.; Bieb, S.V.; Wangi, J.; Barry, A.E.; et al. Re-emergence of yaws after single mass azithromycin treatment followed by targeted treatment: A longitudinal study. Lancet 2018, 391, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chi, K.H.; Danavall, D.; Taleo, F.; Pillay, A.; Ye, T.; Nachamkin, E.; Kool, J.L.; Fegan, D.; Asiedu, K.; Vestergaard, L.S.; et al. Molecular differentiation of Treponema pallidum subspecies in skin ulceration clinically suspected as yaws in Vanuatu using real-time multiplex PCR and serological methods. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 92, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. World Health Organisation; Glonal Health Observatory. By Category|Status of Endemicity for Yaws-Data by Country. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/status-of-yaws-endemicity (accessed on 29 May 2024).
  52. Beale, M.A.; Marks, M.; Sahi, S.K.; Tantalo, L.C.; Nori, A.V.; French, P.; Lukehart, S.A.; Marra, C.M.; Thomson, N.R. Genomic epidemiology of syphilis reveals independent emergence of macrolide resistance across multiple circulating lineages. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, C.Y.; Chi, K.H.; Pillay, A.; Nachamkin, E.; Su, J.R.; Ballard, R.C. Detection of the A2058G and A2059G 23S rRNA gene point mutations associated with azithromycin resistance in Treponema pallidum by use of a TaqMan real-time multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 908–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Šmajs, D.; Pospíšilová, P. Macrolide resistance in yaws. Lancet 2018, 391, 1555–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mitjà, O.; Houinei, W.; Moses, P.; Kapa, A.; Paru, R.; Hays, R.; Lukehart, S.; Godornes, C.; Bieb, S.V.; Grice, T.; et al. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for yaws. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for identification, screening, and evaluation of articles in the study.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for identification, screening, and evaluation of articles in the study.
Diseases 13 00014 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vicar, E.K.; Simpson, S.V.; Mensah, G.I.; Addo, K.K.; Donkor, E.S. Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future. Diseases 2025, 13, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13010014

AMA Style

Vicar EK, Simpson SV, Mensah GI, Addo KK, Donkor ES. Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future. Diseases. 2025; 13(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vicar, Ezekiel K., Shirley V. Simpson, Gloria I. Mensah, Kennedy K. Addo, and Eric S. Donkor. 2025. "Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future" Diseases 13, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13010014

APA Style

Vicar, E. K., Simpson, S. V., Mensah, G. I., Addo, K. K., & Donkor, E. S. (2025). Yaws in Africa: Past, Present and Future. Diseases, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop