Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Conceptual Framework
2.1. Economic Business Productivity
2.2. Sustainability of SMEs
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Study Area
3.3. Data Collection
3.3.1. Observation
3.3.2. In-Deep Interview
3.3.3. Questionnaire
3.3.4. Documentation
3.3.5. Research Instruments
3.3.6. Triangulation
3.3.7. Research Informants and Respondents
3.4. Data Analysis Method
4. Results
4.1. Determinants of Economic Growth and Technological Innovation
4.2. Government Policies in the SME Sector
4.3. Existence of SMEs
4.4. Strategy for Increasing Business Productivity and Product Marketing
5. Discussion
5.1. Solutions for Increasing Productivity and Marketing of SME Products
5.2. Sustainability and Stability of SMEs
5.3. Open Innovation and Productivity of SMEs
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Stoica, O.; Roman, A.; Rusu, V.D. The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maksum, I.R.; Sri Rahayu, A.Y.; Kusumawardhani, D. A Social Enterprise Approach to Empowering Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vasconcelos, M.V. Political Stability and Bank Flows: New Evidence. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 13, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B.; Syafri, S.; Hadijah, H.; Baharuddin, B.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Sakti, H.H. Management of Slum-Based Urban Farming and Economic Empowerment of the Community of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surya, B. Globalization, Modernization, Mastery of Reproduction of Space, Spatial Articulation and Social Change in Developmental Dynamics in Suburb Area of Makassar City (A Study Concerning on Urban Spatial Sociology). Asian Soc. Sci. 2014, 10, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- United Nation. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi 11 Negara di Asia Tenggara pada. 2019. Available online: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/02/12/pertumbuhan-ekonomi-11-negara-di-asia-tenggara-pada-2019 (accessed on 12 April 2020).
- ASEAN Policy Brief. Economic Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on ASEAN. ASEAN Integration Monitoring Directorate (AIMD) and Community Relations Division (CRD). 2020, pp. 1–17. Available online: https://asean.org/storage/2020/04/ASEAN-Policy-Brief-April-2020_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2020).
- Surya, B.; Ahmad, D.N.A.; Sakti, H.H.; Sahban, H. Land Use Change, Spatial Interaction, and Sustainable Development in the Metropolitan Urban Areas, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Orhan, A.; Kirikkaleli, D.; Ayhan, F. Analysis of Wavelet Coherence: Service Sector Index and Economic Growth in an Emerging Market. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B.; Syafri, S.; Sahban, H.; Sakti, H.H. Natural Resource Conservation Based on Community Economic Empowerment: Perspectives on Watershed Management and Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meyer, N.; Auriacombe, C. Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Suriani, S.; Sakti, H.H.; Hadijah, H.; Idris, M. Environmental Pollution Control and Sustainability Management of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bappenas. Modernisasi UMKM Atasi Permasalahan Masyarakat, Bantu Perekonomian Nasional. IDF. 2019. Available online: https://www.bappenas.go.id/id/berita-dan-siaran-pers/idf-2019-modernisasi-umkm-atasi-permasalahan-masyarakat-bantu-perekonomian-nasional/ (accessed on 12 July 2020).
- Prabowo, R.; Singgih, M.L.; Karningsih, P.D.; Widodo, E. New Product Development from Inactive Problem Perspective in Indonesian SMEs to Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- BPS Makassar City. Makassar City in Figures. 2019. Available online: https://makassarkota.bps.go.id/publication/2019/08/16/4ca03301b8e2b8414e33f6a3/kota-makassar-dalam-angka-2019.html (accessed on 3 February 2020).
- Munizu, M. Pengaruh factor—Faktor eksternal dan internal terhadap kinerja usaha mikro dan kecil di Sulawesi Selatan. J. Manag. Entrep. 2010, 12, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S. Understanding and Acquiring Technology Assets for Global Competition. Technovation 2007, 27, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsien Wang, C.; Yuan Lu, L.; Bein Chen, C. Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation 2008, 28, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xirogiannis, G.; Chytas, P.; Glykas, M.; Valiris, G. Intelligent Impact Assesment of HRM to Shareholder Value. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 35, 2017–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surya, B.; Hadijah, H.; Suriani, S.; Baharuddin, B.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Menne, F.; Rasyidi, E.S. Spatial Transformation of a New City in 2006–2020: Perspectives on the Spatial Dynamics, Environmental Quality Degradation, and Socio—Economic Sustainability of Local Communities in Makassar City, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Širá, E.; Vavrek, R.; Kravčáková Vozárová, I.; Kotulič, R. Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable Competitiveness of the EU Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asian Development Bank. Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth; ADB Outlook; Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong, Philippines, 2014; ISBN 978-92-9254-453-9. Available online: https://www.adb.org/publications/asian-development-outlook-2014-fiscal-policy-inclusive-growth (accessed on 25 July 2020).
- Surya, B.; Hamsina, H.; Ridwan, R.; Baharuddin, B.; Menne, F.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Rasyidi, E.S. The Complexity of Space Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alinska, A.; Filipiak, B.Z.; Kosztowniak, A. The Importance of the Public Sector in Sustainable Development in Poland. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saleh, H.; Surya, B.; Ahmad, D.N.A.; Manda, D. The Role of Natural and Human Resources on Economic Growth and Regional Development: With Discussion of Open Innovation Dynamics. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Lim, U. Social Enterprise as a Catalyst for Sustainable Local and Regional Development. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roser, M. “Economic Growth”. Published online at Our World in Data.org. 2013. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth (accessed on 5 July 2020).
- Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Hamsina, H.; Idris, M.; Ahmad, D.N.A. Rural Agribusiness-based Agropolitan Area Development and Environmental Management Sustainability: Regional Economic Growth Perspectives. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2021, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spangenberg, J.H. Economic sustainability of the economy: Concepts and indicators. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 8, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbloyor, E.K.; Abor, J.Y.; Adjasi, C.K.D.; Yawson, A. Private capital flows and economic growth in Africa: The role of domestic financial markets. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 2014, 30, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalemli-Ozcan, S.; Reshef, A.; Sørensen, B.E.; Yosha, O. Why does capital flow to rich states? Rev. Econ. Stat. 2010, 92, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aoyagi, C.; Ganelli, G. Asia’s quest for inclusive growth revisited. J. Asia Econ. 2015, 40, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiglitz, J.E. The origins of inequality and policies to contain it. Natl. Tax J. 2015, 68, 425–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stiglitz, J.E. America’s Great Malaise and what to do about it. J. Policy Model. 2016, 38, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawaya, A.; Bhero, S. Effect of simplified licensing on registration and formalizing of start-ups in Mozambique. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2018, 12, 542–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surya, B.; Saleh, H. Transformation of metropolitan suburban area (a study on new town development in Moncongloe-Pattalassang Metropolitan Maminasata). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 202, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eliakis, S.; Kotsopoulos, D.; Karagiannaki, A.; Pramatari, K. Survival and Growth in Innovative Technology Entrepreneurship: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. Adm. Sci. 2020, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Hu, W. Multiple Dynamic Mechanisms of Globalization: Alternatives to Capitalism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Phoosawad, S.; Fongsuwan, W.; Trimetsoontorn, J. Leadership, Management Skill and Organization Innovation Affecting Auto Parts Organization Performance. Res. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 8, 70–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G.; Tang, W. What Are the Implications of Globalization on Sustainability? A Comprehensive Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, H.; Sajjad, N.; Wang, Q.; Ali, A.M.; Khaqan, Z.; Amina, S. Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shi, L.; Han, L.; Yang, F.; Gao, L. The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Soto-Acosta, P.; Cismaru, D.-M.; Vătămănescu, E.-M.; Ciochină, R.S. Sustainable Entrepreneurship in SMEs: A Business Performance Perspective. Sustainability 2016, 8, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burhan, B. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi. In Format-format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif untuk Studi Sosiologi, Kebijakan Publik, Komunikasi, Manajemen dan Pemasaran; Prenadamedia Group: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2015; p. 13220. ISBN 978-602-9413.75.5001.42. [Google Scholar]
- Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R dan D. Penerbit. Alfabeta. Bandung. 2011. Available online: https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/10026/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-r-d.html (accessed on 6 January 2020).
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed.; John Willey & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; 448p, ISBN 978-0-471-16240-7. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Sampling+Techniques%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9780471162407 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Rangkuti, F. Analisis Swot Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis: Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis Untuk Menghadapi Abad Ke 21; Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2006; Available online: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UHV8Z2SE57EC&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 5 February 2020).
- Gherghina, S.C.; Botezatu, M.A.; Hosszu, A.; Simionescu, L.N. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): The Engine of Economic Growth through Investments and Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vermeulen, B.; Kesselhut, J.; Pyka, A.; Saviotti, P.P. The Impact of Automation on Employment: Just the Usual Structural Change? Sustainability 2018, 10, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Matuzeviciute, K.; Butkus, M.; Karaliute, A. Do Technological Innovations Affect Unemployment? Some Empirical Evidence from European Countries. Economies 2017, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jia, C.; Tang, X.; Kan, Z. Does the Nation Innovation System in China Support the Sustainability of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Innovation? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, A.; Bibi, S.; Lorenzo, A.; Lyu, J.; Babar, Z.U. Tourism and Development in Developing Economies: A Policy Implication Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wolbers, M.H. Pattern of Labour Market Entry: A Comparative Perspective on School-to-Work Transitions in 11 European Countries. Acta Sociol. 2007, 50, 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koentjoro, S.; Gunawan, S. Managing Knowledge, Dynamic Capabilities, Innovative Performance, and Creating Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Family Companies: A Case Study of a Family Company in Indonesia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamfir, A.; Militaru, E.; Mocanu, C.; Lungu, E.O. School-to-work transition of higher education graduates in four European countries. Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ. 2020, 50, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caraballo, M.A.; Buitrago, E.M. Ethnolinguistic Diversity and Education. A Successful Pairing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Witt, U. Capitalism as a complex adaptive system and its growth. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hong, K.; Kim, B. Organizational Resource, and Innovativeness to Sustainable Design Outsourcing Service. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelley, T.; Kelley, D. Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential within Us All; The Crown Publishing Group: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Luxemburg, R. The Accumulation of Capital: Section Three. The Historical Conditions of Accumulation. Chapter 26. The Reproduction of Capital and Its Social Setting. 2008. Available online: https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1913/accumulation-capital/ch26.htm (accessed on 20 June 2020).
- Surya, B. Spatial Interaction Pattern, and the Process of City Activity Formation System (Case study, Ternate City, Tidore Archipelago City and Sofifi City of North Maluku, Indonesia). Res. J. Appl. Sci. 2015, 10, 880–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amar, M.Y. The influence of product differentiation strategy on operational performance at Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Ventur. 2015, 18, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Setyowati, T.; Fadah, I. Differentiation Competitive Strategy in Winning Smes Advantage at Creative Industry in Jember. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2018, 7, 165–169. Available online: http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/84772 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
- Yoon, J.; Hur, E.J.; Kim, M. An Analysis of the Factors on the Problem-Solving Competencies of Engineering Employees in Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Horváthová, P.; Mikušová, M.; Kashi, K. Comparison of Human Resources Management in Non-Family and Family Businesses: Case Study of the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Chen, H.; Sheng Tsai, F. Strategy Orientation, Innovation Capacity Endowment, and International R&D Intensity of Listed Companies in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Na, Y.K.; Kang, S.; Jeong, H.Y. The Effect of Market Orientation on Performance of Sharing Economy Business: Focusing on Marketing Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2019, 11, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jahanshahi, A.A.; Nawaser, K.; Khaksar, S.M.S.; Kamalian, A.R. The Relationship between Government Policy and the Growth of Entrepreneurship in the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises of India. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2011, 6, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Perez-Gomez, P.; Arbelo-Perez, M.; Arbelo, A. Profit efficiency and its determinants in small and medium-sized enterprises in Spain. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 2018, 21, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasekaran, A.; Rai, B.K.; Griffin, M. Resilience, and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: An empirical research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 5489–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiron, D.; Unruh, G.; Kruschwitz, N.; Reeves, M.; Rubel, H.; Felde, A.M. Corporate Sustainability at a Crossroads: Progress Toward Our Common Future in Uncertain Times. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/corporate-sustainability-at-a-crossroads/ (accessed on 1 July 2020).
- Ioana Munteanu, A.; Bibu, N.; Nastase, M.; Cristache, N.; Matis, C. Analysis of Practices to Increase the Workforce Agility and to Develop a Sustainable and Competitive Business. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nigri, G.; Del Bald, M. Sustainability Reporting and Performance Measurement Systems: How do Small- and MediumSized Benefit Corporations Manage Integration? Sustainability 2018, 10, 4499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masocha, R. Does Environmental Sustainability Impact Innovation, Ecological and Social Measures of Firm Performance of SMEs? Evidence from South Africa. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xin, L.; Tang, F.; Zhang, S.; Pan, Z. Social Capital, and Sustainable Innovation in Small Businesses: Investigating the Role of Absorptive Capacity, Marketing Capability and Organizational Learning. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, K.M.; Kannan, D.; Kumar, P.U. Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices—A case study in Indian context. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 1332–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamage, S.K.N.; Ekanayake, E.M.S.; Abeyrathne, G.; Prasanna, R.; Jayasundara, J.; Rajapakshe, P.S.K. A Review of Global Challenges and Survival Strategies of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Economies 2020, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dushi, N.S.; Dana, L.P.; Ramadani, V. Entrepreneurial marketing dimensions and SMEs performance. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surya, B. Optimization of Function and Role of Traditional Markets in Urban Development System of Ketapang City (A Case Study: Range Sentap Market, Delta Pawan Subdistrict, Ketapang City). World Appl. Sci. J. 2015, 33, 1457–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Jun, S. Statistical Technology Analysis for Competitive Sustainability of Three Dimensional Printing. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gironés, E.S.; Est, R.; Verbong, G. The role of policy entrepreneurs in defining directions of innovation policy: A case study of automated driving in the Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 161, 120243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dvouletý, O. Effects of Soft Loans and Credit Guarantees on Performance of Supported Firms: Evidence from the Czech Public Programme START. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B. The Dynamics of Spatial Structure and Spatial Pattern Changes at the Fringe Area of Makassar City. Indones. J. Geogr. 2015, 47, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.; Kue Na, Y. Effects of Strategy Characteristics for Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Sharing Economy Businesses on Creating Shared Value. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B. Change Phenomena of Spatial Physical in the Dynamics of Development in Urban Fringe Area. Indones. J. Geogr. 2016, 48, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prasanna, R.; Jayasundara, J.; Gamage, S.K.N.; Ekanayake, E.; Rajapakshe, P.S.K.; Abeyrathne, G. Sustainability of SMEs in the Competition: A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Remmang, H. Economic Gentrification and Sociocultural Transformation Metropolitan Suburban of Mamminasata. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 6072–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meré, J.O.; Remón, T.P.; Rubio, J. Digitalization: An Opportunity for Contributing to Sustainability from Knowledge Creation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kook, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, C. Dynamic Technological Diversification and Its Impact on Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Korean IT Firms. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seelos, C.; Mair, J. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Bus. Horiz. 2005, 48, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coghlan, C.; Labrecque, J.; Ma, Y.; Dubé, L. A Biological Adaptability Approach to Innovation for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Strategic Insights from and for Health-Promoting Agri-Food Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eravia, D.; Handayani, T. The Opportunities and Threats of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pekanbaru: Comparison between SMEs in Food and Restaurant Industries. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 169, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diabate, A.; Sibiri, H.; Wang, L.; Yu, L. Assessing SMEs’ Sustainable Growth through Entrepreneurs’ Ability and Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Insight into SMEs in Côte d’Ivoire. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- García, M.R.; García, M.G.; Castillo, A.C. An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krizanova, A.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Gajanova, L.; Kliestikova, J.; Nadanyiova, M.; Moravcikova, D. The Effectiveness of Marketing Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B. Spatial Articulation and Co-Existence of Mode of Production in the Dynamics of Development at the Urban Fringe of Makassar City. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 10, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantele, S.; Vernizzi, S.; Campedelli, B. Untangling the Origins of Sustainable Commitment: New Insights on the Small vs. Large Firms’ Debate. Sustainability 2020, 12, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Dijst, M.; Geertman, S.; Cui, C. Social Sustainability in an Ageing Chinese Society: Towards an Integrative Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Surya, B.; Ruslan, M.; Abubakar, H. Inequility of Space Reproduction Control and Urban Slum Area Management Sustainability (Case Study: Slum Area of Buloa Urban Village in Makassar City). J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 6033–6042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phan, A.C.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, H.A.; Matsui, Y. Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muljani, N.; Ellitan, L. Developing Competitiveness in Industrial Revolution 4.0. Int. J. Trend Res. Dev. 2019, 6, 1–3. Available online: http://www.ijtrd.com/papers/IJTRD20721.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Boldureanu, G.; Ionescu, A.M.; Bercu, A.M.; Bedrule-Grigoruță, M.V.; Boldureanu, D. Entrepreneurship Education through Successful Entrepreneurial Models in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stancu, A.; Filip, A.; Rosca, M.I.; Ionită, D.; Căplescu, R.; Cânda, A.; Rosca, L.D. Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic Options for Romanian SMEs Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic Options for Romanian SMEs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brem, A.; Díaz, R.P. Creativity, Innovation, Sustainability: A Conceptual Model for Future Research Efforts. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, G.X.; Park, K.; Agarwal, A.; Liu, F. Impact of Innovation Culture, Organization Size and Technological Capability on the Performance of SMEs: The Case of China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tolstykh, T.; Gamidullaeva, L.; Shmeleva, N.; Wozniak, M.; Vasin, S. An Assessment of Regional Sustainability via the Maturity Level of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myeong, S.; Kim, Y.; Ahn, M.J. Smart City Strategies—Technology Push or Culture Pull? A Case Study Exploration of Gimpo and Namyangju, South Korea. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, Y.; Lee, M. Smart City 4.0 from the Perspective of Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Juárez, L.E.V.; Vergara, M.C. Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahonen, L.; Hämäläinen, T. CLIQ: A Practical Approach to the Quadruple Helix and More Open Innovation. In Sustaining Innovation: Collaboration Models for a Complex World, Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management; MacGregor, S.P., Carleton, T., Eds.; 2012; Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-2077-4_2 (accessed on 5 October 2020).
- Zhou, J.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, C. Creative Enough to Become an Entrepreneur: A Multi-Wave Study of Creative Personality, Education, Entrepreneurial Identity, and Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drucker, P.F. Manajemen: Tugas, Tanggung Jawab dan Praktek; PT Gramedia: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1999; Available online: http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/manajemen-tugas-tanggung-jawab-praktek-buku-i-peter-f-drucker-diterjemahkan-oleh-sitor-situmorang-dkk-15724.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
- Rupo, D.; Perano, M.; Centorrino, G.; Sanchez, A.V. A Framework Based on Sustainability, Open Innovation, and Value Cocreation Paradigms—A Case in an Italian Maritime Cluster. Sustainability 2018, 10, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oksana Mont, D.B.; Schoonover, H. Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tjiptono, F.G. Chandra. Service, Quality, & Satisfaction; Penerbit Andi: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2005; ISBN 978-979-29-5384-8. Available online: http://www.library.usd.ac.id/web/index.php?pilih=search&p=1&q=0000131247&go=Detailhttp://www.library.usd.ac.id/web/index.php?pilih=search&p=1&q=0000131247&go=Detail (accessed on 5 July 2020).
Business Field | Economic Contribution (Year) | ||
---|---|---|---|
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries | 793,150 | 808,428 | 854,968 |
Mining and Excavation | 1242 | 1102 | 991 |
Processing Industry | 28,442 | 29,380 | 32,666 |
Procurement of Electricity and Gas | 43,855 | 50,468 | 54,824 |
Water Supply, Waste Management, Waste, and Recycling | 284,373 | 307,684 | 306,466 |
Construction | 24,591 | 28,760 | 32,513 |
Wholesale and Retail Trade, Car, and Motorcycle Repair | 27,216 | 31,753 | 36,513 |
Transportation and Warehousing | 3684 | 4151 | 4588 |
Provision of Accommodation, Food, and Drink | 3224 | 3698 | 3980 |
Information and Communication | 12,848 | 14,801 | 16,204 |
Financial Services and Insurance | 8823 | 9706 | 10,375 |
Real Estate | 5569 | 5957 | 6378 |
Company Services | 1660 | 1897 | 2163 |
Government Administration | 4683 | 5494 | 6090 |
Education Services | 12,825 | 14,484 | 18,164 |
Health Services | 3967 | 4483 | 5020 |
Other Services | 3809 | 4470 | 5067 |
Total Gross Regional Domestic Product | 143,148 | 160,207 | 178,430 |
Growth Rate (%) | 11.58 |
Internal Factors | External Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
External Factors | Identification of Factor | Opportunity (O) | Threat (T) |
Determine the opportunity factors | Determine the threat factors | ||
Strength (S) | Strategy (SO) | Strategy (ST) | |
Determine the strength factors | Determine the program that emerges by matching strength (S) with opportunity (O) | Determine the programs that emerge by matching strength (S) with threat (T) | |
Weakness (W) | Strategy (WO) | Strategy (WT) | |
Determine the factors of weakness | Determine the emerging program by matching weakness (W) with opportunity (O) | Determine the emerging program by matching weakness (W) with threats (T) |
Number | Business Field | Growth (%) | Location Quotient (LQ) Value | Information |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries | 5.76 | 0.046 | Non-Base |
2 | Mining and Excavation | −10.08 | 0.000 | Non-Base |
3 | Processing Industry | 11.18 | 2.804 | Base |
4 | Procurement of Electricity and Gas | 8.63 | 0.656 | Non-Base |
5 | Water Supply, Waste Management, and Waste and Recycling | −0.40 | 2.924 | Base |
6 | Construction | 13.05 | 0.300 | Non-Base |
7 | Wholesale and Retail Trade and Car and Motorcycle Repair | 14.99 | 2.712 | Base |
8 | Transportation and Warehousing | 10.55 | 1.364 | Base |
9 | Provision of Accommodation, Food, and Drink | 7.61 | 3.021 | Base |
10 | Information and Communication | 9.47 | 2.698 | Base |
11 | Financial Services and Insurance | 6.88 | 3.377 | Base |
12 | Real Estate | 7.08 | 2.088 | Base |
13 | Company Services | 14.04 | 5.554 | Base |
14 | Government Administration | 10.86 | 1.626 | Base |
15 | Education Services | 25.41 | 3.694 | Base |
16 | Health Services | 11.98 | 2.831 | Base |
17 | Other Services | 13.36 | 4.063 | Base |
Number | Business Field | Economic Growth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component of Economic Growth | Component of Proportional Growth | Component of Economic Competitiveness | Change in Income | ||
1 | Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries | 1,057,065.14 | −924,868.15 | (116,439.18) | 144,713.07 |
2 | Mining and Excavation | 2535.45 | −2437.21 | (1335.13) | (489.89) |
3 | Processing Industry | 37,082,199.82 | −33,649,482.60 | (4,268,916.21) | 6,097,189.86 |
4 | Procurement of Electricity and Gas | 51,791.24 | −43,041.99 | 7426.57 | 17,949.59 |
5 | Water Supply, Waste Management, and Waste and Recycling | 401,717.48 | −348,324.39 | (40,639.64) | 55,452.16 |
6 | Construction | 31,192,545.21 | 196,836,957.61 | 225,597,340.43 | 9,175,035.17 |
7 | Wholesale and Retail Trade and Car and Motorcycle Repair | 33,301,407.04 | −25,985,279.96 | 5,768,581.09 | 10,844,389.58 |
8 | Transportation and Warehousing | 4,776,005.49 | −3,911,636.66 | 239,383.12 | 1,152,235.06 |
9 | Provision of Accommodation, Food, and Drink | 4,254,246.59 | −3,269,843.19 | 428,927.40 | 1,027,590.73 |
10 | Information and Communication | 16,152,629.86 | −12,721,275.80 | 2,080,467.11 | 4,659,740.42 |
11 | Financial Services and Insurance | 10,880,166.30 | −9,30,085.98 | 476,713.53 | 2,875,300.57 |
12 | Real Estate | 7,874,489.85 | −7,068,948.51 | (1,111,907.63) | 1,012,762.68 |
13 | Company Services | 2,165,789.77 | −1,775,437.19 | 121,757.94 | 537,327.08 |
14 | Government Administration | 6,731,082.21 | −6,079,316.11 | (585,154.99) | 1,267,812.03 |
15 | Education Services | 16,637,165.49 | −13,639,381.72 | 844,884.66 | 4,038,030.98 |
16 | Health Services | 4,924,974.78 | −4,054,936.77 | 428,832.14 | 1,391,448.53 |
17 | Other Services | 4,764,170.18 | −3,683,495.79 | 786,903.66 | 1,479,045.95 |
Number | Description | The Process of Adapting to Economic Enterprises | Comparison of the Shift in Normative Space and the Process of Rationalizing Actions | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Small | Medium | Small | Medium | ||
1 | Investment and technology development | Low | Upper | Low | Upper |
2 | Shifting of normative space | Moderate | Upper | Moderate | Upper |
3 | The process of rationalizing actions | Moderate | Upper | Moderate | Upper |
4 | Efforts to increase production | Low | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
5 | Human resource capacity and competence | Low | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
6 | Business diversification | Low | Upper | Low | Upper |
7 | Ability to reach potential market | Low | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Correlated Variables | Coefficient Value | Error | t-Count | t-Table | Information | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government policy for SME development (rx1y) | 0.192 | 0.069 | 2.873 | 1.92 | Significant | |
Business capital support for SME development (rx2y) | 0.137 | 0.052 | 2.853 | 1.92 | Significant | |
Strengthening human resources for the development of SMEs (rx3y) | 0.405 | 0.096 | 4.182 | 1.92 | Significant | |
R | R2 | db1 | db2 | F-count | F-table | |
0.988 | 0.976 | 3 | 6 | 84,813 | 4.76 |
Internal External | Strength | Weakness |
|
| |
Opportunity | Strategies (SO) | Strategies (WO) |
|
|
|
Threats | Strategies (WO) | Strategies (WT) |
|
|
|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Surya, B.; Menne, F.; Sabhan, H.; Suriani, S.; Abubakar, H.; Idris, M. Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020
Surya B, Menne F, Sabhan H, Suriani S, Abubakar H, Idris M. Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020
Chicago/Turabian StyleSurya, Batara, Firman Menne, Hernita Sabhan, Seri Suriani, Herminawaty Abubakar, and Muhammad Idris. 2021. "Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020
APA StyleSurya, B., Menne, F., Sabhan, H., Suriani, S., Abubakar, H., & Idris, M. (2021). Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020