The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Participants
2.3. Questionnaire
2.4. Analytical Tools
3. Result
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Recommendations
6.1. Practical Implications
6.2. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
I. Customer Profile | |||||
Name (Optional): _______________________________ | |||||
Gender: _______ | |||||
Age: | |||||
__ 18–30 years old __ 46–60 years old | |||||
__ 31–45 years old __ 61 years old and above | |||||
Estimated Monthly Income: | |||||
__ P15,000 and below __ P50,001–P100,000 | |||||
__ P15,001–P50,000 __ P100,001 and above | |||||
Number of years owning a Toyota vehicle: ________ | |||||
II. Customer Assessment based on Service Quality | |||||
Answer the following statements by checking the column that corresponds to your answer. | |||||
Rating Scale: | |||||
5—Very Satisfied | |||||
4—Somewhat Satisfied | |||||
3—Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied | |||||
2—Somewhat Dissatisfied | |||||
1—Very Dissatisfied | |||||
Tangibles | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Acessibility to service entrance. | |||||
2. Acessibility to service reception area. | |||||
3. Visual signs and messages for customers provided by the dealer. | |||||
4. Service staffs appearance. | |||||
5. Amenities (TV, WiFi, furnitures, and refreshments). | |||||
6. State of the art equipments in service workshop. | |||||
7. Courtesy items installed to vehicles (floor mats; steering, shifter and handbrake covers). | |||||
8. Overall service reception appearance (service counters and waiting area). | |||||
9. Overall service workshop appearance (equipments, tools, and working bays). | |||||
10. Overall facility appearance (accessibility, cleanliness, ambience, etc.). | |||||
Reliability | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Ease of arranging appointment schedule. | |||||
2. Prioritization on appointment customers. | |||||
3. Accomodation on walk-in customers. | |||||
4. Promised time on service completion. | |||||
5. Fairness on cost estimate prior to servicing. | |||||
6. Vehicle cleanliness (interior and exterior). | |||||
7. Recommendations provided for customer’s vehicle (prior to and after service). | |||||
8. Addressing customer vehicle concerns and requests. | |||||
9. Service staff returns personal belongings and other valuable items. | |||||
10. All the discussed services were done accurately. | |||||
Responsiveness | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Assistance provided by guards or other staffs upon entry. | |||||
2. Assistance by receptionist staff at the reception area. | |||||
3. Waiting time before assisted by the Service Advisor. | |||||
4. Assistance by the Service Advisor. | |||||
5. Service staffs responds to all customer inquiries. | |||||
6. Service advisor’s clarity of explanation of service (prior to and after service). | |||||
7. Clarity of explanation to service billing or charges. | |||||
8. Service staffs promptly serve all customers. | |||||
9. Service staffs courteousness. | |||||
10. Overall service staffs responsiveness to customers. | |||||
Assurance | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Maintenance reminder for customer’s upcoming service. | |||||
2. Confirmation and reminder on customer’s appointment schedule. | |||||
3. Vehicle checklisting or inventory system upon entry (interior and exterior condition; valuable items left). | |||||
4. Informing customers when their vehicle is being service. | |||||
5. Allowing customers to watch their vehicle being service. | |||||
6. Service Advisor’s constant update on the vehicle status. | |||||
7. Providing warranty on parts and service repairs. | |||||
8. Returning of used parts to customers. | |||||
9. All customer concerns and requests were done. | |||||
10. All services and requests done were explained and shown upon vehicle pick-up. | |||||
Empathy | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Service staffs understand customer needs. | |||||
2. Service staffs gives individual attention to customer. | |||||
3. Service staffs apologize when committing mistakes. | |||||
4. Service staffs apologize when customer requests were not done. | |||||
5. Service staffs assist all customers in a caring manner. | |||||
6. Convenient schedule for customers. | |||||
7. Informing if there will be changes in promised time. | |||||
8. Service staffs willingness to help. | |||||
9. Service staffs courtesy. | |||||
10. Dealer is competent in correcting customer concerns. | |||||
III. Customer Assessment based on Customer Satisfaction and Future Intention | |||||
Answer the following statements by checking the column that corresponds to your answer. | |||||
Rating Scale: | |||||
5—Very Likely | |||||
4—Somewhat Likely | |||||
3—Neutral | |||||
2—Somewhat Unlikely | |||||
1—Very Unlikely | |||||
Customer Satisfaction and Future Intention | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
1. Recommending TDM’s service to a friend or peer. | |||||
2. Re-availment of TDM’s service. | |||||
3. Switching to another Toyota Service left. | |||||
4. Switching to non-Toyota or outside car service left. | |||||
5. Recommending the service marketing staff/Service Advisor to a friend or peer. | |||||
6. Switching to another service marketing staff/Service Advisor. | |||||
7. Continue patronizing TDM’s services even if your vehicle is already out of warranty. | |||||
8. Continue patronizing TDM’s services despite of price increases. | |||||
9. Continue patronizing TDM’s services despite of minor unwanted experience. | |||||
10. Overall satisfaction with TDM’s Service performance. |
References
- Tahanisaz, S.; Shokuhyar, S. Evaluation of passenger satisfaction with service quality: A consecutive method applied to the airline industry. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2020, 83, 101764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunkoo, R.; Teeroovengadum, V.; Ringle, C.; Sunnassee, V. Service quality and customer satisfaction: The moderating effects of hotel star rating. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 91, 102414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, M.; Salam, M.; Fayolle, A.; Jaafar, N.; Ayupp, K. Impact of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in Malaysia Airlines: A PLS-SEM Approach. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2018, 67, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaiardelli, P.; Saccani, N.; Songini, L. Performance measurement of the after-sales service network—Evidence from the automotive industry. Comput. Ind. 2007, 58, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokouhyar, S.; Shokoohyar, S.; Safari, S. Research on the influence of after-sales service quality factors on customer satisfaction. J. Retail. Consu. Serv. 2020, 56, 102139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista. Automotive Industry in the Philippines. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1009280/philippines-automotive-companies-by-number-units-sold/ (accessed on 22 November 2020).
- Toyota. Toyota Dasmarinas-Cavite. Available online: http://www.toyotadasma.com.ph/about_us.php (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Toyota. Toyota Motor Philippines. Available online: https://toyota.com.ph/ (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Baidoo, F.; Odum-Awuakye, G.A. Assessing customer satisfaction levels in the SMES automobile vehicle maintenance and repairs service delivery system in cape coast—Ghana. Afr. J. Appl. Res. 2017, 3, 82–94. [Google Scholar]
- Baber, H. Service quality perception of customers—A study of Toyota Motors in India. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 2018, 9, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngaliman, E.; Suharto, M. The effect of tangibles, responsiveness, and reliability on customer satisfaction of delivery services. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 2019, 6. Available online: http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org/IJEMS/paper-details?Id=310 (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- Johnson, E.; Karlay, J. Impact of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction. Master′s Thesis, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden, May 2018; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
- Kalaja, R.; Myshketa, R.; Scalera, F. Service quality assessment in health care sector: The case of durres public hospital. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 235, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatzoglou, P.; Chatzoudes, D.; Vraimaki, E.; Leivaditou, E. Measuring citizen satisfaction using the SERVQUAL approach: The case of the Hellenic Post. Proc. Econ. Financ. 2013, 9, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rezaei, J.; Kothadiya, O.; Tavasszy, L.; Kroesen, M. Quality assessment of airline baggage handling systems using SERVQUAL and BWM. Tour. Manag. 2018, 66, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.H.; Nurunnabi, M.; Rahman, M.; Masud, M.A. Exploring the relationship between customer loyalty and financial performance of banks: Customer open innovation perspective. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ijadi Maghsoodi, A.; Saghaei, A.; Hafezalkotob, A. Service quality measurement model integrating an extended SERVQUAL model and a hybrid decision support system. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2019, 25, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasetyo, Y.; Castillo, A.; Salonga, L.; Sia, J.; Seneta, J. Factors affecting perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 prevention measures among Filipinos during enhanced community quarantine in Luzon, Philippines: Integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Inf. Dis. 2020, 99, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.; Boudreau, M. Structural equation modeling and regression; Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2000, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Vatolkina, N.; Gorbashko, E.; Kamynina, N.; Fedotkina, O. E-service quality from attributes to outcomes: The similarity and difference between digital and hybrid services. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.; Kim, B. Service quality, relationship benefit and experience value in the auto repair services sector. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasetyo, Y.T.; Tanto, H.; Mariyanto, M.; Hanjaya, C.; Young, M.N.; Persada, S.F.; Miraja, B.A.; Redi, A.A. Factors affecting customer satisfaction and loyalty in online food delivery service during the covid-19 pandemic: Its relation with open innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasetyo, Y.T.; Senoro, D.B.; German, J.D.; Robielos, R.A.; Ney, F.P. Confirmatory factor analysis of vulnerability to natural hazards: A household Vulnerability Assessment in Marinduque Island, Philippines. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 50, 101831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balinado, J.R.; Young, M.N. The impact of technology on service supply chain of Toyota Dasmarinas Cavite: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Frontiers of Industrial Engineering (ICFIE), Singapore, 18–20 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Balinado, J.R.; Tri Prasetyo, Y. The impact of 5S lean tool to service operation: A case study in toyota dasmarinas-cavite service operations. In Proceedings of the 2020 the 6th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering, Macau, China, 27–29 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
Characteristics | Category | Frequency (N) | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 157 | 61.3% |
Female | 98 | 38.3% | |
Prefer Not to Say | 1 | 0.4% | |
Age | 18–30 years old | 85 | 33.2% |
31–45 years old | 122 | 47.7% | |
46–60 years old | 47 | 18.3% | |
60 years old and above | 2 | 0.8% | |
Estimated Monthly Income | P15,000 and below | 39 | 15.2% |
P15,001—P50,000 | 160 | 62.5% | |
P50,001—P100,000 | 52 | 20.3% | |
P100,001 and above | 5 | 2% | |
Number of Years Owning a Toyota Vehicle | 0–5 years | 166 | 64.8% |
6–10 years | 78 | 30.5% | |
11–15 years | 9 | 3.5% | |
16–20 years | 2 | 0.8% | |
21 years and above | 1 | 0.4% |
No | Variables | Direct Effect | p-Value | Indirect Effect | p-Value | Total Effect | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | T → CS | −0.20 | 0.058 | - | - | −0.20 | 0.058 |
2 | Re → CS | 0.45 | 0.006 | - | - | 0.45 | 0.006 |
3 | Rs → CS | −0.13 | 0.375 | - | - | −0.13 | 0.375 |
4 | A → CS | 0.11 | 0.251 | - | - | 0.11 | 0.251 |
5 | E → CS | 0.68 | 0.000 | - | - | 0.68 | 0.000 |
Factor | Cronbach’s α | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | Composite Reliability (CR) |
---|---|---|---|
Reliability | 0.963 | 0.702 | 0.959 |
Empathy | 0.982 | 0.829 | 0.980 |
No | Variables | Direct Effect | p-Value | Indirect Effect | p-Value | Total Effect | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Re → CS | 0.32 | 0.001 | - | - | 0.32 | 0.001 |
2 | E → CS | 0.73 | 0.000 | - | - | 0.73 | 0.000 |
Goodness of Fit Measures of the SEM | Parameter Estimates | Minimum Cut-Off | Recommended by |
---|---|---|---|
Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) | 0.897 | >0.80 | [19] |
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) | 0.862 | >0.80 | [19] |
Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | 0.039 | <0.07 | [20] |
Incremental Fit Index (IFI) | 0.952 | >0.90 | [20] |
Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) | 0.953 | >0.90 | [20] |
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | 0.951 | >0.90 | [20] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Balinado, J.R.; Prasetyo, Y.T.; Young, M.N.; Persada, S.F.; Miraja, B.A.; Perwira Redi, A.A.N. The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020116
Balinado JR, Prasetyo YT, Young MN, Persada SF, Miraja BA, Perwira Redi AAN. The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021; 7(2):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020116
Chicago/Turabian StyleBalinado, Justine Roy, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Michael Nayat Young, Satria Fadil Persada, Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja, and Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira Redi. 2021. "The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 2: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020116
APA StyleBalinado, J. R., Prasetyo, Y. T., Young, M. N., Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Perwira Redi, A. A. N. (2021). The Effect of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction in an Automotive After-Sales Service. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020116