Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- How does Industry 4.0 affect business models?
- What are the key pillars of Industry 4.0 affecting new business models?
2. Industry 4.0 towards Open Business Model
- Increased economic efficiency;
- Increased work efficiency;
- Increased flexibility;
- Reduction in production costs;
- Increased return on investment.
- What is the total number of publications in the areas of “business models”, “Industry 4.0” and “business models and Industry 4.0”?
- What is the ranking of researchers in terms of the number of publications and citations?
- Which countries are leading in addressing the described topics?
- Which research centers are leading in conducting research?
- Which journals and conferences have addressed the issues under consideration?
- Which research areas can be considered key based on the content of selected publications based on the criterion of “Highly Cited Paper”?
- Which pillars of business models in the Industry 4.0 era are recognized in the selected papers?
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
- The area of “business models” already emerged in 1996. When the first publications were published to reflect on the new form of management, there were several of them on an annual basis. Currently, this area is at the end of the definition period, gradually moving to maturity; however, the concept of management through the definition of a business model still requires multi-faceted research and is intensively explored by researchers. Many researchers have defined the business model concept and identified its components that are essential for managing a company in a turbulent, competitive environment. Since 2015, the number of publications in this area has started to exceed one thousand, and the description of business models has become increasingly complex, multidimensional and multi-faceted.
- The “Industry 4.0” area is a young research area, but the period of its emergence has already passed (2013). Since 2014, when only 35 papers were published in the WoS database, there has been a very intense growth of interest in this topic (issues). In 2017, the number of articles was 920, and since 2019, it has already exceeded the number of two thousand—every year.
- For the area “business models and Industry 4.0”, the emergence phase dates back to 2015 (1 publication) and 2016 (11 publications). In 2019, the number of publications in this area increased to 46—this area is now in the final phase of definition.
- Teece D.J. (2010) Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planing 43:2–3, pp. 172–194. This publication has been quoted 2504 times; its aim is to understand the importance of business models and explore their links with business strategies, innovation management and economic theory.
- Amit R., Zott C. (2001) Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), pp. 493–520. This publication has been quoted 2014 times. The publication describes business models as the design of transactional content, structure and governance to create value by exploiting business opportunities.
- Zott C., Amit R., Massa L. (2011) The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management 37:4, pp. 1019–1042. This publication has been quoted 1673 times to explain the concept of business models for banks and find a way to identify digital business models of banks.
- Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom, S. (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and corporate change, 11(3), 529–555. This publication has been quoted 1672 times. This paper explores the role of the business model in capturing value from early-stage technology.
- Rochet J.-Ch., Tirole J. (2003) Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), pp. 990–1029, https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 1531 times. This paper builds a model of platform competition with two-sided markets.
- Lasi H., Fettke P., Kemper H.G., Feld T., Hoffmann M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & information systems engineering, 6(4), pp. 239–242. This publication has been quoted 1230 times; its aim is to describe Industry 4.0.
- Xu L.D., Xu E.L., Li L. (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends, International Journal of Production Research, 56:8, pp. 2941–2962, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 750 times. This paper reviews the state of the art of Industry 4.0 as it relates to industries.
- Lee J., Hung-An K., Shanhu Y., Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment. Procedia CRIP, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 747 times. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the trends of transformation of manufacturing services in a big data environment and the readiness of intelligent predictive computing tools to manage big data to achieve transparency and productivity in this way.
- Zhong R., Xu X., Klotz E., Newman S. (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review. Engineering, 3(5), pp. 616–630. This publication has been quoted 672 times. This article provides a comprehensive overview of related Industry 4.0 topics such as smart manufacturing, Internet of Things (IoT)-based manufacturing and cloud-based manufacturing.
- Yongxin L., Deschamps F., Rocha E., Ramos L. (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal, International Journal of Production Research, 55:12, pp. 3609–3629, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 602 times. The purpose of this article is to outline research trends in Industry 4.0.
- Moeuf A., Pellerin R., Lamouri S., Tamayo-Giraldo S., Barbaray R. (2018) The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research 56:3, pp. 1118–1136. This publication has been quoted 250 times; its purpose is to provide a literature review of existing applied research, covering various issues of Industry 4.0 in relation to SMEs.
- Muller J.M., Buliga O., Voigt K.L. (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 132, pp. 2–17. This publication has been quoted 249 times. Its purpose is to analyze how Industry 4.0 triggers changes in the business models of manufacturing SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) by conducting qualitative research on a sample of 68 German SMEs from 3 industries (automotive suppliers, mechanical engineering and factories, as well as electrical engineering and ICT).
- Nascimento D.L.M., Alencastro V., Quelhas O.L.G., Caiado R.G.G., Garza-Reyes J.A., Rocha-Lona L. Tortorella G. (2019) Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), pp. 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071 (accessed on 23 November 2021). This publication has been quoted 152 times. This article aims to explore how rising technologies from Industry 4.0 can be integrated with circular economy (CE) practices to establish a business model that reuses and recycles wasted material such as scrap metal or e-waste.
- Frank A.G., Mendes G.H.S., Ayala N.F., Ghezzi A. (2019) Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148, pp. 341–351. This publication has been quoted 148 times. It aims to show the basis for the growing research on the interface between service and Industry 4.0 because servicing and Industry 4.0 are considered to be two of the latest trends transforming industrial enterprises.
- Ghobakhloo M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 252, 119869. This publication has been quoted 129 times. This paper aims to add to the sustainability literature by systematically identifying sustainability functions in Industry 4.0.
- (1)
- How have international research trends evolved from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021 (from the areas visualized in Figure 6)?
- (2)
- What are the key conceptual clusters formed on the historiographic map of scientific publications from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2021?
5. Discussion
- How will the innovative business model be structured, especially in the SME sector?
- How can the business model lead to a sustainable society?
- Will servitization be a new direction for business models?
- What will be the social dimension of business models?
- 10th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS).
- 11th International Conference on Business Excellence—Strategy, Complexity and Energy in Changing Times.
- 25th IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/25th ICE/IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ITMC).
- IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS).
- 35th International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA).
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, A Literature Review; Working Paper; Technische Universität: Dortmund, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2017, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkel, H.; Veile, J.W.; Müller, J.M.; Hartmann, E.; Voigt, K.-I. Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Erboz, G. How to Define Industry 4.0: The Main Pillars of Industry 4.0. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326557388_How_To_Define_Industry_40_Main_Pillars_Of_Industry_40 (accessed on 6 July 2021).
- Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; The World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kagermann, H. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. In Proceedings of the VDI-Nachrichten, Berlin, Germany, 1 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Kagermann, H.; Helbig, J.; Hellinger, A.; Wahlster, W. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industry 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry. Final Report of the Industry 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion 2013. Available online: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2021).
- Azmi, A.N.; Kamin, Y.; Noordin, M.K.; Nasir, A.N.M. Towards industrial revolution 4.0: ‘employers’ expectations on fresh engineering graduates. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
- Bauernhansl, T.; Hompel, M.; Vogel-Henser, B. Industrie 4.0 in Produkten. Automatisierung und Logistik; Springer: Fachmedien/Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Berger, R. The Industrie 4.0 Transition Quantified. How the Fourth Industrial Revolution Is Reshuffling the Economic, Social and Industrial Model; Roland Berger: Munich, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Brettel, M.; Friedrichsen, N.; Keller, M.; Rosenberg, M. How virtualization, decentralization and networkbuilding change the manufacturing landscape. An Industry 4.0 Perspective. Periodical 2014, 8, 37. [Google Scholar]
- Nanterme, P.; Daugherty, P. Technology for People: The Era of the Intelligent Enterprise. Available online: https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/accenture/next-gen-4/tech-vision-2017/pdf/accenture-tv17-full.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2021).
- Saniuk, S.; Saniuk, A.; Cagáňová, D. Cyber Industry Networks as an Environment of the Industry 4.0 Implementation. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 1649–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saniuk, S.; Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B. Personalization of products in the Industry 4.0 concept and its impact on achieving a higher level of sustainable consumption. Energies 2020, 13, 5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saniuk, S.; Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B. Social expectations and market changes in the context of developing the industry 4.0 concept. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arnold, C.; Kiel, D.; Voigt, K.I. How industry 4.0 changes business models in different manufacturing industries. In Proceedings of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), Boston, MA, USA, 13–16 March 2016; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Baden-Filler, C.; Haefliger, S. Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Plan 2017, 46, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Burmeister, C.; Luettgens, D.; Piller, F.T. Business Model Innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the Industrial Internet Mandates a New Perspective on Innovation. Die Unternehm. -Swiss J. Bus. Res. Practice 2016, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcante, S.; Kesting, P.; Ulhøi, J. Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing the missing linkages. Manag. Decis. 2011, 49, 1327–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chesbrough, H. Business Model Innovation: It’s Not About Technology Anymore. Strategy Leadersh. 2007, 35, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grabowska, S.; Gajdzik, B.; Saniuk, S. The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 on Business Models. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0; EcoProduction (Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing), Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, S.; Spieth, P. Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 2013, 17, 1340001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirtz, B.W.; Pistoia, A.; Ullrich, S.; Gottel, V. Business model innovation: Development, concept and future research directions. J. Busienss Models 2016, 4, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Zott, C.; Amit, R. The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis. Strateg. Organ. 2013, 11, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grabowska, S. Business model metallurgical company built on the competitive advantage. METAL 2016. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, 25–27 May 2016; pp. 1800–1807. [Google Scholar]
- Miśkiewicz, R.; Wolniak, R. Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilloni, V. How Data Will Transform Industrial Processes: Crowdsensing, Crowdsourcing and Big Data as Pillars of Industry 4.0. Future Internet 2018, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santos, K.; Loures, E.; Piechnicki, F.; Canciglieri, O. Opportunities Assessment of Product Development Process in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1358–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.A. Cyber-physical systems-are computing foundations adequate. In Position Paper for NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap; Citeseer: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H. Research Letters: A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strozzi, F.; Colicchia, C.; Creazza, A.; Noè, C. Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 6572–6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Implementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2016, 12, 3159805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berger, R. Industry 4.0—The New Industrial Revolution—How Europe Will Succeed; Roland Berger Strategy Consultants: Munich, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Morrar, R.; Arman, H. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2017, 7, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 408–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosgrave, K.W. The smart cyber-physical systems of sustainable industry 4.0: Innovation-driven manufacturing technologies, creative cognitive computing, and advanced robotics. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2019, 7, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
- Manavalan, E.; Jayakrishna, K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 925–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, E.; Rüsch, M. Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 2017, 89, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, J.M.; Kiel, D.; Voigt, K.-I. What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jabłoński, A. Twórczy model biznesu w koncepcji gospodarki sieciowej. Studia Pr. Kol. Zarządzania Finans. Zesz. Nauk. 2018, 162, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newth, F. Business Models and Strategic Management. A New Integration; Business Expert Press: Hampton, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Zott, C.; Amit, R.; Massa, L. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1019–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rasmussen, B. Business Model the Theory of the Firm; Working Paper; Victoria University of Technology: Footscray, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Velu, C. Business Model Innovation and Third-Party Alliance on the Survival of New Firms. Technovation 2015, 35, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Suh, T.; Roy, D.; Baucus, M. Emerging Technology and Business Model Innovation: The Case of Artificial Intelligence. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khumalo, M.; Van Der Lingen, E. The open business model in a dynamic business environment: A literature review. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 2017, 28, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandulli, F.; Chesbrough, H. The Two Faces of Open Business Models. Research Paper Series (RPS). Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1325682 (accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Sheets, R.; Crawford, S. Harnessing the Power of Information Technology: Open Business Models in Higher Education. Educ. Rev. 2012, 47, n2. [Google Scholar]
- Chesbrough, H. Managing open innovation. Res. -Technol. Manag. 2004, 47, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bretschneider, U.; Ebel, P.; Leimeister, J. Open business model innovation via the internet: How Wiki technologies can improve the quality of business models. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2021, 18, 2040004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saebi, T.; Foss, N. Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. Eur. Manag. J. 2015, 33, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chesbrough, H. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2007, 48, 22. [Google Scholar]
- Chesbrough, H. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Rojas, E.; Azevedo, A. Pillars and elements to develop an open business model for innovation networks. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 317–326. [Google Scholar]
- Brasseur, T.; Mladenow, A.; Strauss, C. Open business model innovation: Literature review and agenda for future research. Бuзнec-Инфopмamuкa 2017, 4, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Matějíček, M.; Marešová, P. Open Business Model and Open Innovation: Bibliographic Analysis; Hradec Economic Days. Available online: https://digilib.uhk.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.12603/259/Matejicek_Maresova.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 23 November 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berre, A.; de Man, H.; Lew, Y.; Elvesæter, B.; Ursin-Holm, B. Open business model, process and service innovation with VDML and ServiceML. In Enterprise Interoperability: Research and Applications in Service-Oriented Ecosystem, Proceedings of the 5th International IFIP Working Conference IWIE 2013, Enschede, The Netherlands, 27–28 March 2013; Wiley-ISTE: London, UK, 2013; Volume 10, p. 127. [Google Scholar]
- Chiaroni, D.; Chiesa, V.; Frattini, F. The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation 2011, 31, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluszcz, A.; Manowska, A. The Use of Hierarchical Agglomeration Methods in Assessing the Polish Energy Market. Energies 2021, 14, 3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, E.; Jafari, S.M.; Doorbash, Z.M.; Mirzaei, A. Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2021, 26, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Wang, H. How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 124, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pile, T. Developing a Framework for Open Innovation; Pepperdine Graziadio Business School: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bogers, M.; Chesbrough, H.; Heaton, S.; Teece, D.J. Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Calif. Manage. Rev. 2019, 62, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmquist, M.; Fredberg, T.; Ollila, S. Exploring the field of open innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2009, 12, 326–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluszcz, A.; Manowska, A. Differentiation of the Level of Sustainable Development of Energy Markets in the European Union Countries. Energies 2020, 13, 4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozkan, N.N. An Example of Open Innovation: P&G. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 1496–1502. [Google Scholar]
- Bican, P.M.; Guderian, C.C.; Ringbeck, A.; Bican, P.M. Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: An intellectual property perspective. J. Knowl. Manag. 2017, 21, 1384–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-J.; Chen, H.; Rogers, D.S.; Ellram, L.M.; Grawe, S.J. A bibliometric analysis of reverse logistics research (1992–2015) and opportunities for future research. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 666–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaur, R.; Awasthi, A. City logistics: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Bibliometr. Bus. Manag. 2018, 1, 160–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norton, M.J. Introductory Concepts in Information Science; Information Today, Inc.: Medford, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Du, H.; Li, B.; Brown, M.A.; Mao, G.; Rameezdeen, R.; Chen, H. Expanding and shifting trends in carbon market research: A quantitative bibliometric study. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pekarcikova, M.; Trebuna, P.; Kliment, M.; Dic, M. Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler, B. Methods for Bibliometric Analysis of Research: Renewable Energy Case Study; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Grzybowska, K.; Awasthi, A. Literature review on sustainable logistics and sustainable production for Industry 4.0. In Sustainable Logistics and Production in Industry 4.0 New Opportunities and Challenges; Grzybowska, K., Awasthi, A., Sawhney, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A. Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts. Retr. Serv. 2015, 7, 1–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afuah, A. Business Models. A Strategic Management Approach; McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Brzóska, J. Model biznesowy–współczesna forma organizacyjnego zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. [in] Organizacja i Zarządzanie. Kwartalnik Naukowy. Gliwice 2009, 2, 5–23. [Google Scholar]
- Thomson, A.A.; Strickland, A.J. Strategic Management Concepts and Cases; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Nogalski, B.; Niewiadomski, P. Business model—An ephemeral trend or a claim of the future? The orientation of enterprises within the agricultural machinery sector. Management 2019, 23, 7–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- DaSilva, C.M.; Trkman, P. Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Plan. 2004, 47, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magretta, J. Why Business Models Matter? Available online: https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter (accessed on 23 November 2021).
- Prahalad, C.K.; Krishnan, M.S. New Age of Innovation; Mc Graw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Müller, J.M.; Buliga, O.; Voigt, K.I. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 132, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, A.G.; Mendes, G.H.; Ayala, N.F.; Ghezzi, A. Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 141, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moeuf, A.; Pellerin, R.; Lamouri, S.; Tamayo-Giraldo, S.; Barbaray, R. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1118–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Research Area | Search Results (Number of Documents) |
---|---|
Area I—Business Models | 15.031 |
Area II—Industry 4.0 | 10.329 |
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0 | 200 |
TOP 5 | Surname of the Author | Country of Origin of the Author | H-Index | Search Results (Number of Documents) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Area I—Business Models | ||||
I | Lindgren P. | Denmark | 6 | 37 |
II | Ghezzi A. | Italy | 18 | 34 |
III | Zhang J. | China | 0 | 30 |
IV | Bocken NMP. | Netherlands | 34 | 28 |
IV | Evans S | England | 27 | 28 |
V | Bouwman H. | Netherlands | 21 | 26 |
Area II—Industry 4.0 | ||||
I | Romero D. | Mexico | 19 | 36 |
I | Zharinov IO. | Russia | 4 | 36 |
II | Rauch E. | Italy | 17 | 35 |
II | Shukalov AV. | Russia | 13 | 35 |
III | Zakoldaev DA. | Russia | 4 | 34 |
IV | Leitao P. | No data available | - | 31 |
IV | Li D. | China | 10 | 31 |
V | Wuest T. | USA | - | 30 |
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0 | ||||
I | Ganzarain J. | Spain | 4 | 4 |
I | Ibarra D. | Spain | 2 | 4 |
I | Muller JM | Austria | 8 | 4 |
II | Adrodegari F. | Italy | 11 | 3 |
II | Gebauer H. | Switzerland | 32 | 3 |
II | Herceg IV. | Serbia | 1 | 3 |
II | Igartua JI. | Spain | 6 | 3 |
II | Krcmar H. | Germany | 7 | 3 |
II | Saccani N. | Italy | 22 | 3 |
II | Saniuk S. | Poland | 12 | 3 |
II | Schaefer D. | Switzerland | 29 | 3 |
TOP 5 | Name of the Research Center | Search Results (Number of Documents) |
---|---|---|
Area I—Business Models | ||
I | University of California System | 145 |
II | University of London | 143 |
III | Delft University of Technology | 129 |
IV | Polytechnic University of Milan | 122 |
V | University of Cambridge | 117 |
Area II—Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique Cnrs | 120 |
I | RWTH Aachen University | 120 |
II | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft | 115 |
III | Polytechnic University of Milan | 106 |
IV | University of Basque Country | 89 |
V | Universidade Do Minho | 79 |
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Technical University Czestochowa | 5 |
II | Aarhus University | 4 |
II | Centre Nationa De La Recherche Scientifigue | 4 |
II | Linkoping University | 4 |
II | Mondragon Unibertsiatea | 4 |
II | University of Zielona Gora | 4 |
TOP 5 | Category Name | Search Results (Number of Documents) |
---|---|---|
Area I—Business Models | ||
I | Management | 3443 |
II | Business | 3300 |
III | Computer Science Information System | 1799 |
IV | Engineering Electrical Electronic | 1458 |
V | Computer Science Theory Methods | 1217 |
Area II—Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Engineering Electrical Electronic | 1841 |
II | Engineering Manufacturing | 1555 |
III | Engineering Industrial | 1549 |
IV | Computer Science Theory Methods | 1340 |
V | Automation Control Systems | 1288 |
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Management | 42 |
II | Business | 41 |
III | Green Sustainable Science Technology | 31 |
IV | Engineering Industrial | 29 |
V | Enviromental Sciences | 27 |
TOP 5 | Source Titles | Search Results (Number of Documents) |
---|---|---|
Area I—Business Models | ||
I | Sustainability—Journal | 430 |
II | Journal of Cleaner Production—Journal | 285 |
III | Lecture Notes in Computer Science—Journal | 186 |
IV | Procedia CIRP | 148 |
V | Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing—Journal | 113 |
Area II—Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Ifac Papersonline—Journal | 246 |
II | Sustainability—Journal | 245 |
III | Procedia Manufacturing—Journal | 219 |
IV | IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology—Book Series | 208 |
V | IEEE Access | 197 |
Area III—Business Models and Industry 4.0 | ||
I | Sustainability—Journal | 22 |
II | Technological Forecasting and Social Change—Journal | 7 |
III | IFIP Advances in Production Systems (Conference) | 5 |
III | Procedia CIRP | 5 |
IV | Education Excellence and Innovation Management: A 2025 Vision To Sustain Economic Development During Global Challenges (Conference) | 4 |
IV | IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (Ice/Itmc) (Conference) | 4 |
IV | Journal of Cleaner Production—Journal | 4 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2022, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019
Grabowska S, Saniuk S. Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022; 8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrabowska, Sandra, and Sebastian Saniuk. 2022. "Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis" Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019
APA StyleGrabowska, S., & Saniuk, S. (2022). Business Models in the Industry 4.0 Environment—Results of Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010019