Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Sensor Locations for Electrodermal Activity Monitoring Using a Wearable Belt System
Next Article in Special Issue
Robust Distributed Collaborative Beamforming for WSANs in Dual-Hop Scattered Environments with Nominally Rectangular Layouts
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Exploration of Limitations of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithm for Fault Diagnosis Under Fault and Ground Resistances of Multiterminal High-Voltage Direct Current System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Network Diffusion Algorithms and Simulators in IoT and Space IoT: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Key Enabling Technologies for 6G: The Role of UAVs, Terahertz Communication, and Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces in Shaping the Future of Wireless Networks

by
Wagdy M. Othman
1,
Abdelhamied A. Ateya
1,2,*,
Mohamed E. Nasr
3,
Ammar Muthanna
4,5,
Mohammed ElAffendi
2,
Andrey Koucheryavy
4 and
Azhar A. Hamdi
1
1
Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
2
EIAS Data Science Lab, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia
3
Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
4
Department of Telecommunication Networks and Data Transmission, The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, 193232 Saint Petersburg, Russia
5
Department of Applied Probability and Informatics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2025, 14(2), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020030
Submission received: 11 February 2025 / Revised: 7 March 2025 / Accepted: 11 March 2025 / Published: 17 March 2025

Abstract

:
Sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks have the potential to transform global connectivity by supporting ultra-high data rates, ultra-reliable low latency communication (uRLLC), and intelligent, adaptive networking. To realize this vision, 6G must incorporate groundbreaking technologies that enhance network efficiency, spectral utilization, and dynamic adaptability. Among them, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), terahertz (THz) communication, and intelligent reconfigurable surfaces (IRSs) are three major enablers in redefining the architecture and performance of next-generation wireless systems. This survey provides a comprehensive review of these transformative technologies, exploring their potential, design challenges, and integration into future 6G ecosystems. UAV-based communication provides flexible, on-demand communication in remote, harsh areas and is a vital solution for disasters, self-driving, and industrial automation. THz communication taking place in the 0.1–10 THz band reveals ultra-high bandwidth capable of a data rate of multi-gigabits per second and can avoid spectrum bottlenecks in conventional bands. IRS technology based on programmable metasurface allows real-time wavefront control, maximizing signal propagation and spectral/energy efficiency in complex settings. The work provides architectural evolution, active current research trends, and practical issues in applying these technologies, including their potential contribution to the creation of intelligent, ultra-connected 6G networks. In addition, it presents open research questions, possible answers, and future directions and provides information for academia, industry, and policymakers.

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, the global wireless communication network has transitioned from the first-generation (1G) to the fifth-generation (5G). This continuous evolution in cellular wireless networks is driven by the need for higher data rates, increased network capacity, lower latency, and improved connectivity. In late 2017, 3GPP-Release 15 standardized the first phase of 5G cellular networks, offering a flexible network design to accommodate a wide range of applications, including enhanced mobile broadband, basic ultra-reliable low-latency communications (uRLLC), and massive machine-type communications (mMTC) [1]. Currently, the standardization of the 5G mobile communication system has been implemented in many cities worldwide [2]. It promises to enhance network performance and ensure wide-area connectivity. However, the exponential increase in data traffic due to the vast number of connected devices, predicted to be hundreds per cubic meter, poses a significant challenge.
With the rapid advancement of the Internet of Everything (IoE) over the next decade, many new applications and services are emerging. These include augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), facial recognition, and e-health, which are increasingly interconnected and communicating. Such applications demand extremely high data rates while maintaining reliability and low latency. Additionally, transitioning from the current Industry 4.0 to the upcoming Industry 5.0 paradigm will pose significant challenges [3]. The existing 5G technology will struggle to meet these advanced applications’ enormous data rate and ultra-low latency requirements. As a result, academia, industry, and research communities are shifting their attention toward the upcoming generation of mobile communication networks, i.e., the sixth-generation (6G), which is expected to emerge by 2030 to satisfy future requirements and to manage the huge traffic generated by smart devices and applications [4]. In contrast to its predecessors, 6G will be able to effectively unify artificial intelligence (AI), edge computing, and dynamic network reconfiguration, thereby ushering in an era of ubiquitous intelligence, hyper-connectivity, and extreme spectral efficiency [4,5].
By 2025, the number of global mobile users is expected to reach 13.8 billion and 17.1 billion, and the traffic will reach up to five zettabytes by the end of 2030 [6]. The world’s first 6G Wireless Summit was launched in March 2019 to identify the key challenges, and its vision toward 6G can be summarized by the statement “ubiquitous wireless intelligence” [7]. It is expected that 6G will revolutionize the cellular wireless evolution from “connected things” to “connected intelligence” with more stringent key performance indicators (KPIs) [8]. AI will be the foundation of the 6G evolution, allowing self-managing, intelligent, and adaptive wireless networks. AI shall revolutionize the potential of future wireless networks from autonomous network management and intelligent spectrum allocation to quantum-secured communications and brain–machine interfaces. With the 6G evolving, AI-enabled innovations are going to be the basis of a hyper-connected, intelligent digital environment, providing seamless, secure, and ultra-reliable communication across a wide range of applications and sectors [9].
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), terahertz (THz) communication, and intelligent reconfigurable surfaces (IRSs) are among the most promising technologies driving the 6G revolution [5,10]. UAV-enabled networks will extend coverage in both disconnected and mobile settings, providing flexible, on-demand communications for applications related to, e.g., disaster relief, autonomous mobility, and industrial automation [10]. The THz communication is designed to offer multi-gigabit-per-second data rates, which can help us alleviate the spectrum congestion problem highlighted by the existing wireless systems. In the meantime, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) will dynamically control the electromagnetic wave, and the spectral efficiency of signal propagation will be maximized in dense urban and indoor environments [11].
Communication at THz frequencies is expected to become a key of 6G wireless networks, supporting applications that demand extremely high speed, ultralow, and secure communication. Its high bandwidth can accommodate new applications like real-time digital twins, immersive VR, and telemedicine surgery [11]. In addition, combining THz communication with complementary communication systems (e.g., RIS, quantum communication (QC), and AI network optimization) will be the next-generation driving forces toward 6G [12]. The THz band represents a paradigm shift in wireless communication, combining extraordinary capacity, security, and resilience. Although existing challenges (high propagation loss, transceiver design efficiency, and low cost of deployment) need to be addressed, research and standardization activities continue to build the foundation for its inclusion in 6G networks and will drive the evolution of global connectivity in the future [11,13].
This survey presents an exhaustive overview of key enabling technologies of 6G and addresses their architectural improvements, design issues, and implementation into 6G networks. The work considers three main technologies: UAVs, THz, and IRS. Additionally, the proposed work describes recent work in progress, open problems, and future directions in UAV-aided communication, THz spectrum application, and IRS deployment. It discusses how they will contribute to the future of the wireless ecosystem. Table 1 provides all abbreviations used throughout the work to better go through the work.

Survey Methodolgy

The following four processes summarize the methodology used to conduct this survey.
  • Search strategy and databases
  • Selection criteria
  • Review and categorization process
  • Quality assessment and reproducibility
This literature review systematically searched IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Elsevier (ScienceDirect), SpringerLink, and arXiv to identify relevant studies on UAVs, THz communication, and IRS in 6G networks. We considered the following keywords: 6G enabling technologies, 6G UAV communications, UAV cellular connectivity, THz communications for 6G, IRS/RIS for next-generation wireless networks, IRS-assisted 6G networks, and 6G standardization. Additional sources were considered based on 3GPP, ITU, ETSI white papers, technical reports and standards, and references from highly cited survey and review papers.
The following inclusion criteria were considered when selecting the articles.
  • Peer-reviewed articles and conference papers published in the last five years (2019–2024).
  • Studies addressing technical challenges, architecture, and real-world applications of UAVs, THz, and IRS in 6G.
  • Papers that present theoretical foundations, experimental validations, or simulation results relevant to the three key technologies.
However, we excluded studies focusing on 5G without discussing 6G adaptability and articles lacking substantial technical discussion. The selected literature was classified into four primary categories: 6G specifications and enabling technologies, UAV-assisted communications, THz spectrum utilization, and IRS-assisted 6G communications. For each category, we identified key research trends, challenges, and open questions. A comparative analysis was conducted to highlight the synergies between these enablers and their potential integration in 6G networks.

2. Sixth-Generation Use-Cases

Numerous new use cases will be supported by 6G, which will cover a wide range of applications. The 6G use cases can be seen as an evolution to the current 5G. According to the 5G, there are three main use cases, including eMBB, mMTC, and uRLLC. Recently, three novel use cases for 5.5G have been added to the main three use cases, which are RTBC, UCBC, and HCS [14]. These use cases are extended to another three dimensions in 6G to include uMUB, uHSLLC, and uHDD [15]. The advancements in 6G technology are anticipated to bring significant performance improvements to various communication technologies. This section considers the potential use cases of 6G networks. Table 2 summarizes the main use cases and introduces the features and requirements of each case.
  • Augmented and virtual reality
AR is an emerging and promising communication method that is widely recognized as a primary use case for 6G technology. VR technology creates a simulated environment with a first-person view that users can interact with using specialized equipment, such as a headset. This allows the user to fully immerse themselves in a virtual world and experience it as if they were there. VR is used for a range of purposes, such as gaming, tourism, sport, education, and therapy. VR technology has the potential to facilitate communication and collaboration among people who are not in the exact physical location. By using VR, people can make eye contact and interact with virtual objects as if they were in the same room. This can significantly improve the effectiveness of group communication and benefit businesses with remote or international teams or people who cannot travel [16].
Sixth-generation networks are expected to significantly improve the VR/AR experience by providing faster speeds, lower latency, and more capacity than current 5G networks. This can lead to more realistic and immersive experiences that can be used in various fields, such as 3600AR video streaming gaming, entertainment, education, and training, as well as in industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. Additionally, 6G networks can support more users in accessing VR/AR experiences at the same time, particularly in large-scale events [17]. Furthermore, 6G networks are expected to have advanced AI and machine learning (ML) capabilities, which can optimize the VR/AR experience for different users and devices. Overall, the 6G network has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with technology and with each other by providing VR/AR experiences that open new possibilities for various industries [16,18].
XR, with its advanced high-definition imaging and 4K/8K resolution, can be utilized in a variety of innovative applications such as entertainment, education, virtual meetings, and work communication [19]. AR applications are known for their uRLLC, as they demand a delay of 5 ms [20]. An approach that can be taken to attain the necessary delay time for AR applications is to implement MEC at the edge of the RAN. In [20], the authors developed a system that utilizes three main levels of diverse edge servers, and as a result, three levels of offloading are achieved, leading to higher latency efficiency. This can meet the E2E latency within the specified requirements for AR applications.
2.
Holographic telepresence (Teleportation)
Holographic telepresence allows people to feel like they are in the same room as others, even if they are physically far away, by creating a 3D holographic representation of them. The delay with this technology will need to be extremely low, in the range of less than a millisecond. It requires the capability to display thousands of synchronized view angles, as opposed to the limited number required for VR and AR [21]. Furthermore, to achieve a fully immersive remote experience, digitizing and transmitting all five human senses through future networks will be necessary, increasing the amount of data that needs to be transferred. The 3D holographic display technology will require an extremely high data transfer rate, around 4.32 Tbps [21]. This presents significant challenges for the current 5G network in terms of its ability to handle the high data transfer rate needed for technology.
3.
Smart healthcare (Healthcare 5.0)
The healthcare industry has undergone significant changes as a result of the advancements in 5G technology and is expected to continue to evolve with the introduction of 6G. The strain on healthcare systems is caused by an increase in the aging population and the challenges posed by the lack of real-time tactile feedback and high costs [22]. In addition, the healthcare industry is working to develop remote surgeries, and accessing remote healthcare necessitates the implementation of strict QoS standards. These standards include maintaining exceptionally and extremely low latency, providing extensive network coverage, ensuring ultra-high data rates, and delivering ultra-high reliability.
As a result, industry and academia are actively researching communication and networking solutions that facilitate remote healthcare access. The features of 6G architecture are expected to be better than 5G, which will facilitate the implementation of brain–computer interface (BCI) systems, which require ultra-reliable communication with extremely minimal lag, measured in microseconds. Healthcare 5.0 is expected to deploy sensor-based technology that utilizes neurological techniques to transmit human senses in real-time. Such kinds of Healthcare 5.0 applications require euRLLC that is expected to be provided by 6G networks [23].
4.
Industrial automation (Industry 5.0)
The manufacturing industry incorporates new technologies into product design and development, including IoT, AI, big data, digital twins, and blockchain. Sixth-generation will bring the Industry 5.0 revolution to fruition through the digital transformation of manufacturing processes using cyber–physical systems and IIoT services. The removal of the boundaries between the physical factory and the virtual computational space will allow for more cost-effective, flexible, and efficient internet-based diagnostics, maintenance, and machine-to-machine communications [24]. Automation brings its own set of requirements in terms of reliable and synchronized communication, which 6G is well equipped to handle through its cutting-edge technologies. For instance, in industrial control, real-time operations with a guaranteed delay jitter in the microseconds range and peak data rates in the Gbps range will be required for AR/VR applications such as training and inspections [25].
Table 2. Specifications of the main use cases of 6G.
Table 2. Specifications of the main use cases of 6G.
Use CasesApplications/ScenarioKey RequirementsEnabling 6G Technologies
Ubiquitous mobile ultra-broadband (uMUB)
[26,27]
Holographic communicationExtremely high data rates, ultra-low latency, high synchronizationTHz, VLC, supermassive MIMO, AI, edge intelligence, and digital twins
Ultra-realistic XR, 16K streamingExtreme data rates (Tbps), ultra-low latency (<1 ms), high reliability, and global coverageTHz, VLC, supermassive MIMO, AI, edge intelligence, and QC
Enhanced mobile InternetHigh data rates, improved coverage, network resilienceSupermassive MIMO, IRS, edge intelligence, zero-touch network, and AI
High-quality immersive AR/VR gaming and streaming experiencesExtreme data rates (Tbps), very low latency, high reliability, and global coverageTHz, VLC, supermassive MIMO, AI, edge intelligence, and QC
Autonomous vehicular systemsUltra-low latency (<1 ms), high reliability, and high-speed data transferTHz, VLC, edge intelligence, supermassive MIMO, AI, and blockchain
Smart cities and IoT
ecosystems
Massive device connectivity, low power consumption, and high reliabilityIoE, blockchain, IRS, and zero-energy interface
Ultra-high-speed with low-latency communications (uHSLLC)
[28,29]
Industrial automation
(Industry 5.0)
Ultra-low latency (<1 ms), extremely high reliability (99.9999%), and high securityAI, edge intelligence, time-sensitive networking (TSN), zero-touch networks, and digital twins
Autonomous drivingUltra-low latency, high reliability, and high positioning accuracy.THz, VLC, edge intelligence, supermassive MIMO, AI, and blockchain
Remote surgery and healthcareUltra-low latency, extremely high reliability, high bandwidth for video and sensor dataTHz, VLC, edge intelligence, supermassive MIMO, and robot avatar
Immersive gaming and virtual realityLow latency, high data rates, and immersive sensory integrationTHz, VLC, edge intelligence, AI, supermassive MIMO, new coding techniques, and zero-touch network
Tactile InternetExtremely low latency, ultra-reliability, and high securityAI, new coding techniques, and edge intelligence
Drone swarmsUltra-reliable navigation, collision avoidance, real-time reroutingAI, IRS, ISAC, edge intelligence, robot avatar, QC, new multiple access techniques, and zero-touch network
Ultra-high data density (uHDD)
[15,28,30]
Precision agricultureMassive connectivity, long battery life for devices, and reliable data transmissionSupermassive MIMO, NOMA, edge intelligence, zero-energy interface, and blockchain
Environmental monitoringMassive connectivity, remote sensing capabilities, and efficient data collection and analysisSupermassive MIMO, NOMA, edge intelligence, zero-energy interface, blockchain, ISAC, digital twin, and AI
Smart manufacturingHigh reliability, low latency, secure communication, real-time data acquisition and processingDigital twin, blockchain, AI, IEC, and ISAC
Human-centric services (HCSs)
[31,32]
Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and neurotechnologyUltra-low latency, high data precision, security, and biocompatibilityAI, QC, edge intelligence, and ISAC
Haptics interfacesLow latency, precise feedback mechanisms, and real-time adaptation.Edge intelligence, AI, new coding techniques, QC, IEC, and ISAC
Augmented human capabilitiesUltra-low latency, biocompatible devices, and secure data interfacesRobot avatar, AI, zero-energy interface, ISAC, digital twin, and blockchain
Ethical AI governanceSecure data sharing, explainable AI models, and regulatory complianceBlockchain, AI, and QC
Empathic/ affective communicationReal-time data analysis, privacy, and low
latency
AI, edge intelligence, and new coding techniques

3. Specifications and Main Requirements of 6G Networks

Sixth-generation is expected to provide ultimate performance improvements to enable novel services and applications. This section provides the characteristics and major technical requirements that define the future of 6G networks. The main requirements of the 6G networks include the following.
1. 
Massive connectivity
The continuous growth in the number of connected users is a significant driving force behind the advancement of wireless technology. The KPI used to assess the usage scenario of mMTC is connection density. In 5G, the minimum number of devices with a lower QoS per square kilometer is 10 6 ; however, this number is expected to increase tenfold to 10 7 devices per square kilometer in the future [33]. In anticipation of the significant increase in connection density, 6G networks are expected to introduce new technologies, including THz communication, VLC, and blockchain-based spectrum sharing, to meet the demand.
2. 
Latency
The emergence of 6G technology is poised to redefine wireless communication, particularly in relation to latency. Latency, the delay experienced during data transmission, plays a crucial role in the performance of time-sensitive applications. In 6G networks, the aim is to drastically reduce latency to an unprecedented level, reaching mere microseconds.
3. 
Reliability
The upcoming 6G wireless technology is expected to improve network reliability significantly, targeting near-perfect reliability rates of approximately 99.99999%. Sixth-generation networks are anticipated to be designed with advanced security features that will further enhance their overall reliability [1].
4. 
Ubiquitous connectivity
Mobile data usage has been increasing quickly in recent years, and this trend is expected to persist in the future. Based on research findings, it is predicted that the global mobile data traffic will escalate to 282 EB each month by 2027 [34]. The limitations that have been identified with 5G wireless networks include high interference resulting from extensive interconnections, inadequate computing capacity, and a lack of ubiquitous connectivity [35]. As a result of these limitations, there is a growing need for 6G communication, which is expected to offer superior capabilities and features compared to 5G. The upcoming 6G networks are expected to facilitate the connection of various devices, including personal devices, sensors, vehicles, and others [1,35]. It will offer uninterrupted and extensive connectivity across various environments while meeting indoor and outdoor service standards. This will be achieved through a reliable and cost-efficient infrastructure.
5. 
Security
The security of 6G networks is a top priority due to potential challenges. These networks will support diverse applications requiring stricter security measures, including AI and big data technologies. Key security aspects include privacy protection, defense against external and internal threats, and prevention of flooding attacks [1]. Additionally, incorporating localization and sensing, new network architectures, and meeting low latency and high-reliability requirements will necessitate innovative security and privacy approaches.
6. 
Unmanned mobility
Using UAVs as flying BSs has the potential to greatly increase the capacity and coverage of current wireless networks, which is why researchers are interested in exploring this approach for developing 6G networks. Compared to traditional fixed BSs, UAVs have the advantage of being highly agile and mobile, allowing them to be rapidly deployed to support existing cellular networks. This improves network connectivity for distant terminals. Additionally, UAVs have a wide range of other potential applications, such as fire detection, disaster response, and surveillance. As a result of these features, UAVs have garnered significant attention as a defining feature of 6G networks [36].
6G networks are anticipated to exceed the capabilities of 5G and 4G by overcoming their constraints and facilitating transformational applications via improved KPIs. The principal KPIs of 6G encompass ultra-high data speeds (up to 1 Tbps), sub-millisecond latency, exceptional energy efficiency, pervasive coverage, and inherent integration of AI. Moreover, 6G aims to enhance spectrum efficiency, facilitate an unparalleled density of device connections per square kilometer, and accommodate new technologies, including holographic communications, digital twins, and intelligent autonomous systems [1,8]. In contrast to 4G and 5G, 6G networks are designed to revolutionize communication capabilities by achieving a substantially higher throughput and lower latency. Mobile broadband was primarily introduced by 4G, with speeds of up to 1 Gbps and a latency of approximately 50 milliseconds. However, 5G has exceeded these limits, with 10–20 Gbps speeds and latencies of less than 10 milliseconds. Nevertheless, 6G establishes even more ambitious objectives, indicating that it will achieve speeds exceeding 1 Tbps and latencies as low as 100 microseconds [2,4]. These developments will facilitate the development of real-time immersive applications, including Tactile Internet and extended reality.
Additionally, 6G prioritizes sustainable and intelligent networking, which addresses obstacles such as environmental impact and energy consumption. Energy efficiency and AI-driven network management are the fundamental objectives of 6G, in contrast to 4G and 5G, which prioritize quicker connectivity and capacity. Furthermore, 6G sets itself apart from the energy-intensive operations of 5G and 4G by introducing the concept of “zero energy communication” to fuel devices through ambient energy harvesting [37]. This paradigm shift guarantees that 6G is not only more efficient and quicker but also environmentally sustainable. Table 3 provides a comparative analysis of KPIs of 4G, 5G, and 6G systems. Also, Table 4 provides the key requirements and specifications of the new applications provided by 6G networks. Furthermore, Figure 1 presents the key challenges with the evolution of 6G. The KPIs of 6G networks can be summarized as follows [1,8,26,29].
  • Carrier bandwidth: In 6G networks, there is a need to support frequencies up to 100 GHz in the VLC and THz bands, as well as frequencies up to 10 GHz in the mmWave bands.
  • Spectral efficiency: The spectral efficiency of 6G is projected to be five times higher than that of 5G.
  • Peak data rate: The required speed of 6G networks is ≥1 Tbps, which is significantly faster than 5G by 100–1000 times.
  • Mobility: The 6G networks are anticipated to support high-speed trains and UAVs, ensuring a maximum speed of 1000 kph.
  • Energy efficiency: The energy efficiency of 6G should be improved by 10 to 100 times compared to 5G.
  • Latency: The 6G networks have stricter requirements for many applications, including AR, VR, XR, and holographic communications. Sixth-generation networks aim to support E2E latencies of 10–20 µs.

4. Key Enabling Technologies of 6G Networks

This section discusses a few technologies that are expected to drive the development of 6G. Figure 2 presents the key enabling technologies of 6G applications.

4.1. Supermassive MIMO

Massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO) is a technology used in wireless communication systems that involves the use of a large number of antennas at the transmitter and receiver. Massive MIMO can provide a high bandwidth and energy-efficient network, improve network reliability and coverage, and reduce interference, enabling more users to be supported in a given area. It is a key solution for B5G and 6G applications to enable better performance of communication [38]. The basic idea of massive MIMO is that it works by serving multiple user terminals at the same time. It is the most common configuration of centralizing massive MIMO (CL-MIMO). Typically, using terahertz (THz) signals is a problem due to the high losses of transmission and reflection, which, if not handled properly, could make the communication go to the dogs, so to speak [39].
However, some serious problems, e.g., channel characterization, must be considered during the actual implementation of the massive MIMO systems. There are a multitude of antennas at the BS, so it is hard to make a model and estimate the channels. For the last twenty years, traditional below-the-carrier channel models have been made with far-field conditions and plane wavefronts in mind. Cell-free massive MIMO, which has been the evolution of massive MIMO, has emerged as one of the most promising technologies for next-generation communications systems beyond 5G. Instead of the regular CL-MIMO, which strongly centers the antennas, the cell-free massive MIMO or rather distributed MIMO or distributed massive MIMO, which fully uses the entire airport area, has antennas installed almost anywhere. This set of processes helps to advance various aspects such as spectral efficiency, energy efficiency, and uniform service quality over the coverage area [40].
The spatial distribution of cell-free MIMO makes the technology interactive and enables efficient resource management, making it a perfect solution in dense user environments of future networks [40]. Therefore, student researchers and industry actors are now more focused on creating and improving this technology. Thus, their vision connects with the central systems built so far and the potential to build better communication networks. Yet another variation in massive MIMO, DM-MIMO distributed type, is even simpler and more direct as it places the antennas across the cell area rather than in one place. This distribution is a development technique whereby signal acquisition is expanded over the space of the cells, as opposed to localizing them in one location. It successively gives the effect of gain of spatial diversity, attenuation of path loss, and decrease in blockage and fading. Hence, DM-MIMO stands as the most suitable substitute for the problematic situation of massive MIMO systems; it provides broader coverage and more powerful and efficient usage of the available spectrum, all necessary for future wireless networks [41].

4.2. Artificial Intelligence

AI will serve as a core driver of 6G technology, enabling unprecedented innovation in network intelligence, automation, and optimization. Using AI, wireless systems are able to show human-like cognition, including learning, reasoning, perception, and decision-making, and then dynamically respond to dynamic environment changes. Self-sufficient decision-making with autonomous learning capability and efficient resource optimization to cater to the demands of various applications will be embodied in AI-enabled 6G networks. Unlike 4G and 5G, where AI plays a limited role, 6G will feature full AI automation, leading to the transformation from conventional radio systems to intelligent, self-optimizing networks [42].
Among AI’s enabling functionalities in 6G networks, real-time network automation and optimization plays a leading role. AI will continue to improve, i.e., assist network functions (e.g., traffic management, handover, and spectrum allocation) for real-time decision-making. Based on the combination of deep learning and reinforcement learning (RL), the self-healing features of 6G networks can be realized, i.e., detecting and repairing network errors automatically and without human participation [43]. Moreover, AI will allow for energy efficiency, minimizing the power use of wireless infrastructures via predictive and intelligent analysis of energy use and dynamic management of resources. Furthermore, AI will release the maximum use of radio waves by providing sophisticated cognitive radio (CR) features (e.g., their acquisition and usage).
CR, assisted by AI, will enable adaptive spectrum allocation, interference cancelation, and intelligent beamforming [44]. ML models will compute large spectral datasets to determine the best frequency bands on the fly, providing continuous high connectivity for ultra-dense networks. AI-based algorithms will improve channel estimation and propagation prediction, thus facilitating better resource optimization and higher data rates. AI will change wireless communication at the physical layer (PHY) by enhancing core algorithms such as symbol detection, precoding, antenna selection, and beamforming [44]. Conventional PHY-based methods have limitations in terms of performance for large-bandwidth and high-mobility situations. BCI-based PHY techniques will employ deep learning models to improve signal flow, the suppression of impact, and the correction of errors, resulting in increased spectral efficiency and more robust communication in 6G networks. The creation of BCIs will be among the most impactful AI applications on 6G. BCI systems based on AI will allow natural interaction between human and digital worlds, which will be exploitable for applications in healthcare and augmented and immersive VR. AI will decode and analyze neural signals in real-time, facilitating bidirectional communications between the human brain and machine, thus disrupting the paradigm of human–machine interaction in 6G [45].
Edge intelligence, where AI-based edge computing is used to facilitate low-latency processing and on-the-fly analytics, will be one of the key innovations of 6G [46]. AI will be implemented in edge nodes for decentralized data processing and decreasing reliance on central cloud computing. Federated learning (FL) will transform privacy-preserving AI training on a distributed edge device environment by providing a secure means of data transfer while reducing communication bandwidth. AI-as-a-service (AIaaS) models will also extend AI power by providing intelligent applications for end users in a direct mobile network connection [47]. AI will lead the evolution from smart devices to truly intelligent devices in 6G networks. AI-enabled IoT devices can self-optimize, make autonomous decisions, and share experiences with other devices. AI will improve situation-aware real-time device-to-device communication, predictive maintenance, and intelligent resource allocation, bringing smart cities, healthcare systems, and industrial automation to a new generation of technologies.
Security and privacy are important issues in 6G networks because of the massive data exchange and application complexity. It is proposed that AI will be coupled with a quantum computer to create quantum ML (QML) methods, which can lead to improved encryption and cybersecurity. A quantum key distribution (QKD) security key with encryption at very high levels across access channels shall be used to access a channel. It will provide ultra-secure and tamper-proof key encryption for 6G networks. Using AI and quantum cryptography, 6G will guarantee a strong defense against cyberattacks and data theft [48].

4.3. Terahertz and Visible Light Band

The THz band employs wavelengths ranging from 0.1 THz to 10 THz, and the visible light band (VLB) comprises a wavelength range of 400 THz to 800 THz. The THz band has some key advantages over the mmWave band because it belongs to a high continuous bandwidth and dramatically higher transmission rate range. Due to their shorter wavelength for THz signals, ultra-massive MIMO (UM-MIMO) antenna arrays can be integrated, greatly enhancing spectral efficiency. In addition, the miniature size of the THz transceivers makes the THz transceivers well suited for small, compact, and efficient hardware designs [11]. However, these characteristics position THz communication as an enabling technology to support ultra-high-through-throughput wireless communication, low-latency applications, and mMTC in 6G networks.
However, despite these advantages, THz communication faces critical challenges. These signals are easily distorted by atmospheric absorption, scattering, and blockage by physical barriers, including buildings and the human body. Additionally, molecular absorption becomes a major issue over long distances, particularly in adverse weather conditions. To overcome these constraints, state-of-the-art signal processing methods, RIS, and hybrid networking schemes that use THz in combination with other bands, such as mm-Wave and sub-THz, are under investigation [13].
VLC offers a promising alternative for high-speed indoor data transmission, which exploits the ubiquitous installation of LED lighting units. Data are transmitted efficiently based on the rapid modulation of light intensity [49]. With this method, an efficient and economical way to traditional RF communication could be achieved without the burden of electromagnetic interference (EMI) and security issues. One of the most significant achievements of VLC standardization has been the IEEE 802.15.7 standard, which defines optical wireless communications protocols. Nevertheless, while VLC has its merits, it has not yet been completely standardized into cellular network standards by organizations like 3GPP. There is a significant challenge to the non-coherent nature of VLC, i.e., the transmitter and receiver do not use channel state information (CSI) [50]. Therefore, VLC has increased path loss scaled to the fourth power of distance and thus is highly susceptible to the ambient environment.
In addition, VLC needs a clear line of sight (LOS) and illumination, which constrains its application in a dark environment. It is also vulnerable to interferences by ambient light sources, e.g., sunlight and fluorescent lamps, which cause shot noise and deteriorate the signal quality [49,50]. To overcome these limitations, cutting-edge modulation schemes, adaptive beamforming, and hybrid RF-VLC systems are being developed to increase performance and guarantee continuous connectivity. The combination of THz and VLC in 6G networks will provide a new avenue for applying ultra-fast and low-latency communication. Some of the key applications include the following [50,51,52]:
-
High-speed indoor wireless networks: VLC offers secure, electromagnetically interference-free communication in dwellings, offices, and smart buildings, which can be combined with conventional Wi-Fi and cellular network technologies.
-
Terahertz-based backhaul for ultra-dense networks: THz bands can be exploited as high-throughput wireless backhaul links that can relieve reliance on fiber-optic cabling.
-
Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication: VLC and THz can be utilized in intelligent transportation systems (ITSs) for high-speed, secure application of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications.
-
Underwater and space communication: VLC is suitable for indoor and underwater wireless optical communications (UWOC), while THz can be utilized for deep-space and inter-satellite communications at high speeds for data transfer.
-
Secure and private communication: The limited coverage of VLC makes it an ideal choice for applications requiring enhanced security, such as financial institutions and military installations.

4.4. Internet of Everything (IoE)

In the era of 6G technology, there will be a shift in data consumption models and the way businesses operate. The IoE will be a vital component, connecting people, processes, data, and things. This interconnectedness will revolutionize industries and create new opportunities for innovative network services. The IoE relies on gathering information from various sources and emphasizes the involvement of people as connected nodes. Effective processes within the IoE facilitate interactions and deliver value by providing precise information at the right time and in the right manner. The IoE will lead to a connected world where everyone is meaningfully interconnected, transforming the way we live and work [53].
The IoE is the future generation of digital connection, connecting the people, the processes, the data, and the things to a smart and connected ecosystem. Unlike the IoT, which primarily focuses on linking physical devices to the Internet, IoE extends beyond device connectivity to enable real-time data-driven decision-making, automation, and intelligent interaction across diverse domains. IoE is at the state of the art, performing computing at scale, distributed intelligence, and uRLLC for fluid interaction between networked systems. With the coming of 6G networks, IoE is likely to become mature enough to deliver the expected ultra-long-range, intelligent, and ubiquitous connectivity [52]. The key capabilities of 6G, such as AI-native networking, THz spectrum utilization, edge computing, digital twins, and intelligent automation, will be the foundation for large-scale IoE deployments [54]. The flexible and mixed design of 6G will allow continuous processing of large volumes of data streams, which in turn could be used to enable highly efficient, precise, and adaptive operation of an autonomous system. The key advancements of IoE in 6G networks include the following [52,53,54,55]:
  • Hyperconnectivity and intelligent networking
    -
    Sixth-generation will allow ultra-high-density device coupling to provide trillions of IoE nodes with millisecond latencies and practically instantaneous data rates.
    -
    AI-enabled network orchestration will provide traffic auto-optimization, improved spectral efficiency, and congestion prediction, thereby supporting seamless device-to-device (D2D) communication.
  • Real-time data processing and decision-making
    -
    Using the combination of AI, FL, and edge intelligence, IoE will be able to process and analyze real-time data with huge volumes at the edge, thus minimizing the requirement of cloud processing. This will allow autonomous, adaptive decision-making in powerful applications such as smart cities, industrial automation, precision healthcare, and autonomous transport.
  • Heterogeneous network integration and multi-access connectivity
    -
    IoE in 6G will be implemented across a wide range of communication systems, such as Terahertz communication, LiFi, satellite connectivity, and blockchain-based securing technologies for IoT. This multi-access architecture will improve network robustness and coverage, enabling continuous service provision in remote, urban, and industrial areas.
  • Enhanced security and trust mechanisms
    -
    The highly distributed nature of IoE requires robust security mechanisms, which 6G will address through quantum-safe encryption, AI-driven anomaly detection, and blockchain-enabled trust models.
    -
    Self-healing networks automatically identify and suppress cyber-attacks, guaranteeing privacy, integrity, and resilience in critical applications.
  • Applications across multiple domains
    -
    Smart cities and infrastructure: Autonomous traffic management, AI-powered utilities, and smart grid optimization.
    -
    Healthcare and remote patient monitoring: Wearable health sensors, AI-based diagnosis, and real-time emergency response systems.
    -
    Industrial IoE (IIoE): This includes predictive maintenance, robotics automation, and real-time process control in manufacturing.
    -
    Autonomous transportation and smart mobility: The 6G-based V2X communication enables the development of self-driving cars and intelligent traffic management systems.
    -
    Sustainable development: IoE-based energy-efficient systems, climate monitoring grids, and sustainable agriculture solutions for food security.

4.5. Blockchain

Blockchain technology is emerging as a foundational pillar of security, transparency, and trust in next-generation networks, including 6G. It offers a decentralized, immutable, and tamper-proof ledger that guarantees safe data transfer and does not require centralized intermediaries. Unlike traditional centralized architectures, vulnerable to single points of failure, cyberattacks, and privacy breaches, blockchain leverages distributed consensus mechanisms to authenticate transactions and maintain network integrity. Blockchain networks can be grouped into public, private, and consortium networks, which have different functions in 6G-based applications [56]. The main categories of blockchain that can assist the evolution of 6G applications include the following [56,57]:
(1)
Public blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum)
  • Open to anyone and operate on decentralized proof-of-work (PoW) or proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms.
  • Well suited to handling ordinary transparent and secure IoT payments, decentralized identity management, and cryptographically mediated micropayments.
(2)
Private blockchains (permissioned networks)
  • Works in an isolated ecosystem, with access limited to logged-in users.
  • It is well suited for enterprise scenarios, such as fully secure MEC, FL-based authentication, and slicing for 6G services.
(3)
Consortium blockchains (hybrid model)
  • Controlled by a band of trustworthy individuals, with a tradeoff between security, privacy, and efficiency.
  • Can be implemented in collaborative 6G ecosystems shared by several stakeholders (e.g., telecom providers, cloud providers, and IoT vendors).
Blockchain can improve the security, efficiency, and decentralization of 6G-based networks via various disruptive applications. Table 5 provides the potential applications of blockchain technology in 6G. Although 6G has huge potential, blockchain has several technological constraints that need to be overcome for a straightforward integration with 6G. Contemporary blockchain architecture offers inadequate support for the inherently low latency, large-scale connectivity of 6G. Solutions include sharding, layer-2 scaling (e.g., lightning network), and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) being investigated. Traditional PoW-based blockchains are computationally intensive. The transition to lightweight consensus mechanisms (PoS, delegated PoS, and proof-of-authority) is inevitable for resource-limited IoT devices [58]. For 6G to operate over a range of heterogeneous infrastructures, cross-chain communication protocols must support reliable blockchain communication between different networks.

4.6. Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces (IRSs)

IRSs are flat surfaces consisting of passive reflecting elements that can independently adjust the phase shift in incoming signals. There are two types of IRS structures: antenna-array-based and metasurface-based. By controlling the phase shifts in the reflecting elements, an IRS can redirect reflected signals in desired directions. The use of metamaterials allows for real-time reconfiguration of the reflection coefficient to adapt to changing wireless propagation environments [60]. An IRS has the potential to transform wireless networks with several benefits. These include enhanced signal strength through strategic signal reflection, improving coverage, and reliability. The IRS also optimizes the capacity of wireless networks by minimizing interference and efficiently utilizing the available spectrum. They contribute to reduced latency and improved reliability by carefully manipulating signal reflections to minimize signal loss. Additionally, IRSs enhance the security of wireless networks by making it challenging for potential attackers to intercept and decipher signals, thereby improving overall network security [61]. Section 7 provides a detailed discussion of the IRS and the key deployment for 6G networks.

4.7. Intelligent Edge Computing

Due to the exponentially growing number of interconnected devices, uRLLC demands, and the emergence of AI-enabled applications of 6G networks, distributed intelligent computing paradigms are needed. Edge computing and edge intelligence (EI) represent fundamental technologies that can facilitate run-time, improved security, and optimized resource use by bringing computation to the edge of users and IoT devices. These technologies decrease dependence on centralized cloud environments and enhance next-generation networks’ latency, bandwidth efficiency, and reliability [46]. Edge computing is a distributed computing model that places computational power at the network’s edge to reduce data latency and the burden on centralized cloud servers. This low-latency computing paradigm is fundamental to applications including self-driving cars, smart cities, IIoT, and real-time deep learning inference in 6G networks. Deploying edge computing and EI for 6G networks achieves the following benefits [62,63].
(1)
Works on edge processing, providing real-time responses for latency-constrained scenarios.
(2)
Decreases the requirement to transmit large data bandwidth to the cloud by performing processing locally.
(3)
Offloads computation to several edge nodes so that there are no single points of failure.
(4)
Edge devices analyze local environmental data to make intelligent, contextualized decisions.
(5)
Sensitive data are processed at the source, minimizing exposure to cybersecurity risks.
The 6G edge computing ecosystem comprises multi-tiered architectures that offload processing tasks to devices, edge nodes, and cloud servers. EI is a next-generation evolution of edge computing that deconstructs AI and ML directly into the network edge [62]. This methodology allows smart decision-making at the edge devices without centralized cloud processing. EI is essential in real-time analytics, dynamic resource assignment, FL, and self-adaptive networks in 6G. Table 6 provides the key features of the EI. Integrating edge computing and edge intelligence in 6G networks will transform a wide range of fields by allowing low-latency intelligence applications for industries through AI. Table 7 provides the key applications of EI in 6G networks. Furthermore, Table 8 provides the challenges and potential solutions for deploying EI for 6G networks.

4.8. Digital Twin

A digital twin (DT) is a high-level concept referring to a virtual model of a real-world object that is updated in real-time using data exchange. Such technology allows dynamic monitoring, simulation, prediction, and optimization of physical assets, processes, and/or systems. As 6G technology promises ultra-low latency, high bandwidth, and omnipresent intelligence, DT will play a significant role in a wide range of applications, from smart cities to industrial automation and healthcare [64]. A digital twin consists of three main elements: a physical entity, virtual twin, and data connectivity. The physical entity is the real-world object or system being monitored; however, the virtual twin is the digital replica that mirrors the physical entity in real time. The data connectivity component is the seamless link that enables bidirectional data exchange for analysis and optimization [65].
DT technology will provide a groundbreaking performance for 6G networks, allowing intelligence in the observation, predictive analytics, and real-time optimization for a wide array of industries. Combining the integration of AI, blockchain, edge computing, and extremely high-speed 6G connectivity, digital twins will move from static representations toward learning-by-doing, self-improving intelligent avatars of the real-world processes their physical counterparts represent. Scalability, interoperability, and security issues will be deciding factors in realizing the full potential of this revolutionary technology during the 6G period [66]. Table 9 provides the potential use cases and applications of DT in 6G networks. However, deploying DT for 6G applications faces many challenges that should be addressed. Table 10 provides the main challenges and potential solutions for deploying DT for 6G applications. Furthermore, the following research areas should be further investigated for the complete utilization of digital twin technologies in 6G networks [64,67]:
  • Creation of AI-based self-evolving digital twins for real-time adaptive modeling.
  • Discussion of the potential of neuromorphic computing for optimizing energy performance.
  • Standardization frameworks to enable seamless DT integration across industries.
  • Quantum cryptography to improve data security in DT applications.

4.9. Robot Avatar

A robot avatar is a physical or virtual representation of a person or entity that can be remotely controlled or programmed to mimic human actions, speech, and gestures. These avatars are based on advances in robotics, AI, haptics, and immersive technologies, e.g., extended reality (XR), to ensure seamless human–machine interaction. In the environment of 6G networks, robot avatars would make real-time telepresence, remote teamwork, and intelligent automation possible across many fields, including medicine, learning, space exploration, industrial work, and entertainment [69]. The key features of robot avatars in 6G networks include the following [69,70].
  • Enables immersive and synchronized communication between human users and robot avatars.
  • Allows avatars to learn, predict, and adapt to user preferences using deep learning models.
  • Enhances user experience by providing real-time force, motion, and touch feedback.
  • Merges physical and virtual worlds for more immersive telepresence.
  • Ensures data privacy and secure transactions in avatar interactions.
  • Reduces latency in avatar response time by processing data closer to the user.
Robot avatars are extensively applied in many industries, and each can take advantage of the high-standard, high-speed, low-delay, intelligent communication capabilities of 6G networks. Table 11 provides the potential use cases and applications of robot avatars in 6G networks. Despite their immense potential, several challenges must be addressed for seamless robot avatar integration in 6G networks. Table 12 provides the main challenges and potential solutions for deploying robot avatars for 6G applications.
AI is the backbone of intelligent robot avatars. AI enables avatars to understand and respond to human voice commands and gestures and learn from past interactions to personalize experiences. Furthermore, avatars enable navigating environments autonomously with real-time decision-making and detecting and adapting to emotions using sentiment analysis. Table 13 provides the AI capabilities that assist robot avatars for 6G networks. Blockchain is another critical technology in enhancing security, trust, and transparency in robot avatar applications. Table 14 summarizes the impact of the main features of blockchain on robot avatars.

4.10. Zero-Touch Network

Network automation in 6G networks is the application of AI, ML, and advanced software for the autonomous management and optimization of network services with limited human interaction [77]. With the growing network complexity due to ultra-dense deployments, massive IoT connectivity, and tight QoS requirements, automation is becoming a must for a reliable, whole-life long, cost-effective, and excellent service operation. Network automation in 6G through the utilization of the zero-touch (ZT) network management (ZTM) and the ZT service management (ZSM) framework can deliver self-regulating, self-healing, and self-configurable networks that are able to work in a dynamic and heterogeneous context [78]. The key benefits of network automation for 6G applications include the following [78,79].
  • Automates resource allocation, minimizing manual intervention and reducing maintenance expenses.
  • Ensures uninterrupted service by dynamically adjusting network parameters in real-time.
  • Uses AI-driven analytics to maximize throughput, minimize latency, and balance network loads.
  • Enables faster deployment of new services and features through automated orchestration.
  • Supports intelligent power management to reduce energy consumption in 6G networks.
  • Automates threat detection and mitigation, reducing vulnerabilities.
ZTM is the core concept of 6G network automation, focusing on fully autonomous networks with minimal human intervention. ZTM integrates AI, ML, and intent-based networking (IBN) to enable the following [77,78,79].
  • Self-planning: AI-driven forecasting for proactive resource allocation.
  • Self-configuration: Automatic deployment and configuration of network functions.
  • Self-optimization: Continuous performance tuning based on real-time traffic patterns.
  • Self-healing: Automatic fault detection and recovery to prevent service disruptions.
The ZSM framework, developed by the ETSI, is designed to automate all stages of network operations in 6G. Table 15 provides the ZSM-based network automation use cases in 6G networks. The main objectives of the ZSM framework include the following [78,79,80].
  • End-to-end network automation, covering RAN, core, transport, and edge computing.
  • AI and data-driven automation, leveraging ML models for predictive decision-making.
  • Cross-domain orchestration, automating multi-domain services in hybrid cloud environments.
  • Energy-efficient network operations, optimizing power consumption across all network layers.
  • Security and compliance, implementing real-time monitoring and threat mitigation.
AI and ML play a critical role in enhancing 6G network automation by enabling real-time data analytics for network performance monitoring and predictive maintenance to prevent failures before they occur. Table 16 summarizes the main applications of common AI and ML techniques in automating 6G operations. Summing up, Table 17 summarizes the recent proposed studies and their contributions toward 6G development based on the previously introduced key technologies.

5. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)

UAVs (e.g., drones), a developing field, are useful for a variety of purposes and can assist several industries. For about 30 years, the military has mostly used UAVs for reconnaissance, surveillance, and border strikes. UAVs are also utilized by civilian entities such as law enforcement agencies, crisis response teams, and traffic management. During natural calamities or emergencies where communication lines are cut off, UAVs can be extremely helpful as they can deliver lifesaving equipment and medications quickly and can survey dangerous zones rapidly. They are great for assessing remote areas while minimizing the risk to human management in crisis situations involving chemical fumes release, forest fires, or wildlife tracking altogether [131].
The goal of upcoming mobile networks (B5G/6G) is to expand coverage areas, support more devices, and increase data transfer rates in order to meet the growing demand for data from users. UAVs provide promising solutions for such challenges and introduce multiple ways of supporting 6G requirements and applications. The difficulties faced by end users who reside near the limits of current cellular infrastructures sparked researchers’ interest in utilizing autonomous UAVs as relocatable cell sites. Since drones exhibit impressive nimbleness and adaptability, integrating them as part of wireless systems could lead to noticeable improvements in service availability and proficiency for individuals dwelling beyond main access points. This concept has gained traction as it presents a promising methodology to complement or replace ground-based nodes whenever necessary. UAVs can not only aid ground BSs in offloading data traffic, but they can also improve the channel conditions of edge users by flying close to them to provide LOS links [10].
According to recent research conducted by the 3GPP, there is a need for new strategies to manage interference caused by the increased line-of-sight interactions between aerial UE and ground BSs. This challenge is due to the elevated position of aerial UE and their closer proximity to ground BSs, which highlights the importance of developing innovative tactics to integrate both aerial and ground UEs smoothly within the same cellular framework. While the 3GPP primarily focuses on connecting UAVs to existing cellular networks, other academic and industrial efforts are advancing toward a more sophisticated research stage to utilize the full potential of UAV communication systems. By exploring the possibilities presented by UAV-carried relay devices and mobile BSs that can be relocated to improve network coverage, capacity, and QoE for end-users, experts aim to transform the way future communication networks operate.

5.1. Features and Specifications of Available Market UAVs

Recent advancements in UAV technology have led to significant improvements across various industries. Research highlights efficient cooperation among learning agents in autonomous systems, optimizing communication resources and enhancing UAV performance. Innovations like color-agnostic disparity estimation methods in multi-camera setups improve visual data capture and processing. Additionally, integrating IoT sensors, drones, Wi-Fi, and cloud technologies revolutionizes agricultural practices, enabling precise soil data extraction and crop recommendations, thereby boosting efficiency and productivity. These developments underscore the rapid evolution and expanding capabilities of UAV technology. In 2023, the worldwide market size for anti-drone technology was estimated to be USD 1872.1 million, and it is anticipated to experience a CAGR of 28.1% from 2023 to 2030. The increasing popularity of UAVs for both commercial and recreational purposes has contributed significantly to this growth [132].
The global UAVs market is segmented by region, with North America holding the largest market share driven by strategic contracts and deals, particularly with the U.S. Department of Defense’s significant investment in drone technology. This includes a recent multi-billion-dollar contract with major aerospace companies to develop next-generation UAVs for enhanced reconnaissance and surveillance and commercial agreements in logistics and agriculture employing drones. While the drone industry itself is dominated by DJI, which commands a substantial 70–80% market share as of 2024 and is known for its extensive range of high-quality, other innovative consumer and professional drones play major roles in UAV applications [132,133].
These major players in the UAV industry focus on both consumer and commercial drones, emphasizing racing drones and industrial applications. Each company brings unique innovations and contributions to the diverse and dynamic drone industry [133,134]. Table 18 summarizes the main features and specifications of the currently available drones.
UAVs are classified based on various attributes such as maximum altitude, weight, payload capacity, range, fuel type, operational complexity, coverage range, and applications. These attributes help categorize UAVs and provide information about their capabilities and potential uses [131]. UAVs can have different numbers of propellers, ranging from three to eight. They are categorized into fixed-wing, fixed-wing hybrid, single-rotor, and multirotor types. Fixed-wing UAVs have wings and a forward-flight motor but lack hovering and rotating abilities. Fixed-wing hybrid UAVs combine automated gliding and manual operation. Single-rotor UAVs are mechanically complex, expensive, and require specialized training. Multirotor UAVs, such as quadcopters, hexacopters, and octocopters, are affordable and widely used [150]. Furthermore, UAVs can be categorized, based on their size, into nano, micro, mini, medium, and large. Table 19 introduces these five categories of UAVs and provides their specifications [150,151]. Furthermore, Table 20 provides detailed specifications on some of the common markets available UAVs of each category.
The payload of a UAV refers to its capacity to carry a load, which encompasses all the equipment carried by the UAV, including cameras, sensors, radars, LIDARs, communication equipment, weaponry, and other relevant devices. These payloads serve various purposes, such as capturing imagery, collecting data, facilitating communication, and enabling specific mission objectives. In drone technology, there is a tradeoff between payload capacity and flight duration [162]. Drones often use lightweight lithium-ion batteries for power, but these batteries lack backup power compared to other types. As the payload increases, the drone’s endurance decreases, potentially leading to incomplete missions due to limited flight time. UAV payload is an important characteristic that plays a critical role in estimating the applications, mainly when deploying UAVs to assist coverage and computing resources in 6G networks. Table 21 provides the common payload models of UAVs and the estimated applications for each model.

5.2. UAVs Applications in the 6G Era

UAVs have seen significant advancements and widespread adoption in diverse industries and sectors, from military applications to commercial use cases, due to their convenient deployment, cost-effectiveness, maneuverability, and hovering capabilities. UAVs have many applications in diverse areas, such as crop monitoring, water quality assessment, tree species identification, disease detection, and mine detection. Additionally, UAVs can be utilized in firefighting scenarios to minimize fire disaster evaluation risks. Firefighter UAVs can act as scouts, carrying cameras with thermal imaging technology to aid rescue operations [131]. This section provides the possible applications of UAVs in the era of 6G networks.
a. 
UAV for cellular coverage
UAVs have been employed as aerial BSs to provide wireless coverage when terrestrial BSs cannot be set up [164]. Especially in emergency situations, such as military operations or disaster rescue, it is very useful. In order to prolong the service life of UAVs, energy-saving methods are practical and particularly important, especially considering their limited onboard energy. Current work aims at minimizing energy consumption and optimizing the trajectory and power of UAVs in order to enhance performance. UAVs can be used as flying BSs, relay stations, or LAs, upgrading conventional wireless communication systems by adding benefits to the end-user experience, spectral efficiency, and coverage. The idea of Cellular-Assisted UAV Communication has attracted attention as a means to ensure reliable wireless access between UAVs and ground cellular stations. Cellular-based UAVs have much wider-ranging coverage and perform better than traditional ground-to-UAV communications [10]. They can also serve as aerial BSs under cell network disruption scenarios and improve ground BS coverage [165]. These UAVs can further interface with communication infrastructure and satellites to offer high data rates.
However, deploying UAVs for cellular coverage faces many challenges, including path loss models, deployment strategies, and interference mitigation techniques. Current research in this direction includes exploring various use cases for these BSs, providing widespread coverage, acting as network gateways, functioning as relay nodes, and collecting data. Current research emphasizes the advantages of cellular-connected UAVs over traditional ground-to-UAV communications, such as improved performance, easy monitoring, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, an important direction is to address the unique communication and spectrum requirements of cellular-connected UAV systems and propose a design for heterogeneous networks using UAVs. Exploiting already available frequency bands and utilizing techniques such as millimeter waves and free space optics have been reported as ways of enlarging UAVs’ data link capabilities [10]. The contribution of control links for safe UAV operations and the requirements for low latency and high reliability of control links are critical challenges that need to be solved.
b. 
Precision agriculture
Precision agriculture is essentially about applying the appropriate inputs at the right time and place in a way that will lead to the best possible product outcomes. Some of the key activities that are included in precision farming are collecting data and mapping the variability of agricultural lands, analyzing the data in order to inform management decisions, and the use of controlled application techniques such as targeted pesticide spraying and fertilizer usage. The main aim is to enhance agricultural practices using data-driven decision-making processes [131]. One of the popular applications of UAVs in precision agriculture is weed mapping. Weeds might be the cause of severe problems in agricultural crops because they compete for resources and reduce crop yields.
Herbicides are frequently used for the weed issue, but their excessive use can result in the appearance of herbicide-resistant weeds, increased environmental pollution, and a higher level of costs. UAVs are crucial in making precise weed cover maps for the exact herbicide application. Other applications of UAVs include monitoring vegetation, yield prediction, and plant and crop disease assessment. They produce important information about biomass, nitrogen educational process, crop parameters, and the detection of diseases, which helps farmers decide on crop management, inputs, and disease control. In addition, UAVs are also employed for precision irrigation as they identify the areas that are in need of water; hence, water usage efficiency is increased, crop productivity is enhanced, and specialized soil morphology maps are created for efficient irrigation planning [166].
c. 
Surveillance
Surveillance involves monitoring and collecting information on people, behaviors, activities, infrastructure, or buildings. Surveillance comprises several techniques aimed at seeing and collecting information in diverse environments. Principal methodologies include the following [131,167].
  • Camera surveillance: Employing video cameras to record real-time visuals for the oversight of public areas, private properties, or essential infrastructure. This technique is frequently employed for security, crime deterrence, and the assurance of public safety.
  • GPS tracking: Utilizing GPS technology to monitor the location and movement of cars, individuals, or assets. This technique is extensively employed in fleet management, personal protection, and logistics.
  • Radio surveillance: Entails the interception and monitoring of radio frequency signals, essential for intelligence acquisition, communication security, and the oversight of unauthorized transmissions.
  • Biometric surveillance: Employing biometric data, including facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, and iris recognition, to identify and monitor persons. This approach improves security by offering dependable identity verification in access control systems and public surveillance.
Surveillance activities encompass diverse sectors and fulfill numerous objectives. Table 22 provides the main sectors that cover surveillance activities. Traditional surveillance methods are labor-intensive and inefficient for large-scale and scattered environments. UAVs offer a cost-effective and efficient solution for surveillance and monitoring tasks.
d. 
UAV-enabled edge computing (aerial edge computing server)
MEC is a distributed computing model that facilitates task computing at the network edge to reduce latency and boost the computing capabilities of UE. Since MEC servers are located close to the UE, tasks can be processed at the edge, resulting in less workload being transferred to the cloud and a decrease in latency [168]. Edge computing and UAV systems have a connection that allows UAVs to provide edge computing services to ground user equipment (UE). This means that UAVs can have edge servers installed on them to perform computing tasks for users on the ground. Alternatively, UAVs can also act as users themselves and delegate tasks to edge servers. In traditional cloud computing, tasks would be sent between UAVs and a centralized server located far away.
However, with edge computing, the computational services are brought closer to the UAVs and users at the network’s edge. This eliminates the need for data to travel long distances to reach remote centralized servers. The computational services can be either on the UAVs themselves or at nearby edge locations [169]. In [170], the authors discussed the role of UAV-enabled MECs network architecture applications based on AI for IoT applications. Another framework is introduced in [171], which uses UAV-enabled MEC for energy-efficient resource management approaches in smart IoT device networks. S. A. Huda et al. [172] provided a comprehensive survey of computation offloading in a UAV-enabled MEC environment.
e. 
UAV-assisted backscatter communication
UAVs have emerged as versatile assets in backscatter communication systems, offering multiple roles to enhance the efficiency and reliability of data transmission. Most importantly, UAVs have been used as carrier transmitters, radiating RF signals that are then backscattered by devices that can be modulated to carry data without the need for active RF generation. This method creates substantial energy savings in a backscatter device, and therefore, it is suited to Internet of Things applications, where energy savings are essential. UAVs can extend network coverage to extremely distant and difficult-to-reach areas. In addition, they would serve as aerial relay stations in situations where traditional infrastructure cannot be used. The altitude and position of the UAVs would also improve the LOS conditions between transmitting backscatter devices and receiving nodes when aerial relay stations are used. This will further reduce path loss and interference and create a more reliable communication link [10,131].
Backscatter communications is an emerging technology that offers low-energy communication systems by utilizing ambient RF signals from sources like TV towers, FM towers, and Wi-Fi access points [173]. Backscatter communication, aided by UAVs, would automatically be energy-efficient due to the reduced active RF transmission. The UAVs would harvest and backscatter the RF signals to ensure that IoT devices in the network operate on low power. Such technologies would be used in many applications concerning 6G networks, including smart agriculture and disaster recovery. Backscatter UAVs will dominate vast agricultural fields, transmitting data from soil sensors to centralized servers. Furthermore, UAVs can quickly set up a disaster-focused network in short order.
In situations where a direct channel between the backscatter device and receiver is not possible, UAVs can be used successfully as data relays. Specifically, by hovering or flying between the backscatter devices and ground (or space-based) receivers, UAVs can collect the weak backscattered signal and relay it to the intended receivers while overcoming the communication gap in complex environments such as urban canyons, rural areas, and disasters [174]. In addition, UAVs can also function as mobile receivers in backscatter wireless sensor networks. In this role, UAVs fly over a designated area, collecting data from dispersed backscatter sensors. This mobility permits UAVs to collect data from a variety of sensors across the flight, providing flexibility and scalability to the network.
To maximize the reliability and effectiveness of these operations, the flight legs and sensor activations of UAVs can be effectively managed. Conjoint optimization of UAV trajectories and backscatter device operations guarantees that UAVs are always at the optimum location for signal quality and data acquisition efficiency with minimal energy consumption. For instance, machine learning algorithms can be deployed to predict optimal flight routes based on sensor locations and environmental factors, dynamically adjusting UAV movements to maintain strong communication links. This cooperative effort enhances the performance of backscatter communication systems and minimizes the network’s lifetime by efficiently utilizing the finite power capacities available in the backscatter devices. With these breakthroughs, UAV-based backscatter communication systems promise powerful and energy-efficient communication solutions for a wide range of applications in 6G networks [131].

5.3. Challenges with UAVs

The deployment of UAV/swarm UAVs in diverse environments presents challenges in decision-making, control, path planning, communication, monitoring, and more. Safety, privacy, security, and power are significant concerns. Safety risks arise from the lack of GPS alerts and privacy issues related to data collection. Security risks include signal vulnerability and data hijacking. Power-related challenges involve longer flight times and the need for standardization. Wireless sensor limitations affect performance, and resource allocation is crucial. Regulatory changes and power constraints need to be addressed. Social perception, privacy, safety, and environmental concerns are additional challenges. UAVs offer notable features but face various open issues. Categorizations include operability, technology, regulations, safety, privacy, and security, but alternative perspectives may exist. Figure 3 presents the main challenges associated with deploying UAVs for different applications.
Existing research on UAVs in complex environments often overlooks important environmental factors, leaving room for further exploration. Factors such as wind patterns and solar angles significantly impact UAV performance. Wind patterns can disrupt a UAV’s orientation, location, and speed, necessitating the integration of wind-based elements and mathematical models to study their influence on trajectory and energy transmission. The study of control modalities in human–drone interaction focuses on the challenging task of effectively controlling drones. This requires users to undergo extensive training and dedication to safely and accurately operate drones [175].

5.4. Dynamic Challenges and Adaptive Control Mechanisms of UAV-Based Networks

The high mobility of UAVs presents challenges for maintaining network stability. Unlike traditional static networks, UAV-based networks undergo rapid changes in topology, necessitating adaptive control mechanisms to ensure smooth operation [169]. UAV networks function differently from ground-based networks due to several key challenges, including the following aspects.
  • UAV networks are high/ultra-high mobility networks since UAVs frequently shift their positions, resulting in a highly dynamic network topology. As UAVs move, the network topology is constantly in flux. This evolution impacts routing, handoff management, and connectivity maintenance [169]. Traditional routing protocols often struggle to keep pace with these changes, resulting in frequent link failures and increased latency. Adaptive control mechanisms are crucial for tackling such challenges. These systems adjust network parameters in real-time based on current conditions. Routing in UAV networks must adapt to swift dynamic changes in topology [176]. Key strategies include deploying position-based routing, AI/reinforcement learning-based routing, and swarm intelligence approaches. Position-based routing approaches utilize GPS for real-time updates to routing paths. Other approaches employ AI to make informed decisions about the best paths using historical data. Furthermore, other methods apply bio-inspired algorithms, such as ant colony optimization, to optimize routes on the fly [131].
  • Air networks have variable link quality. Several factors, including altitude, weather conditions, and interference, can influence wireless communication between UAVs. The quality of communication links between UAVs can vary due to several factors, including Doppler shifts resulting from UAV movement, multipath fading caused by reflections from buildings or terrain, and weather-related interference, such as rain and fog, which can disrupt signal propagation [177]. UAV networks frequently operate in congested frequency bands, necessitating adaptive spectrum allocation to minimize interference. Dynamic spectrum management approaches, such as CR and frequency hopping, can be used to maintain network stability in UAV networks. UAVs detect available spectrum and switch to less crowded channels using CR [178]. However, using frequency hopping, UAVs quickly alternate between frequencies to reduce interference and counter jamming threats. To enhance communication stability, UAVs utilize link adaptation methods, including adaptive modulation and coding, and beamforming. Adaptive modulation and coding methods adjust transmission rates dynamically based on channel conditions, while beamforming directs signals toward specific areas to improve link reliability [179].
  • UAVs are energy constraints, operating on limited battery power. With limited battery capacity, UAVs must prioritize energy-efficient networking. Extended communication and computation tasks can quickly deplete power, reducing operational time. Considering the limited battery life of UAVs, energy-efficient strategies include sleep scheduling, energy-efficient routing, and solar-powered UAVs. Using sleep scheduling, UAVs enter low-power modes when not actively transmitting data, thus reducing energy consumption [164].
  • UAVs often operate autonomously or in semi-autonomous modes, which demands robust coordination. AI-driven adaptive control mechanisms allow UAV networks to effectively predict and respond to changing conditions. Predictive analytics, deep learning-based channel estimation, and autonomous flight path optimization techniques are commonly used for network adaptation. Predictive analytics leverages past mobility patterns to forecast future UAV positions and adjust network parameters. Deep learning-based channel estimation can be used to enhance link quality prediction and refine adaptive modulation techniques. Furthermore, AI approaches can be used to optimize UAV routes, balancing network coverage with energy consumption.
  • UAV networks are frequently employed for critical missions, including search-and-rescue operations, surveillance, and traffic monitoring. These applications demand low-latency communication, which is challenging given the frequent link disruptions and high mobility. UAV networks play a crucial role in providing emergency communication during natural disasters [131]. Adaptive routing ensures stable connectivity, even as UAVs adjust their positions in response to changing ground conditions. Furthermore, UAV networks can be used to monitor traffic, identify anomalies, and support law enforcement efforts. Adaptive control mechanisms enhance coverage and help alleviate network congestion.

6. Terahertz Communications

The high demand for mobile data traffic is growing rapidly, and data rates are predicted to reach multiple tens of Gbit/s. This raises concerns about having enough available spectrum to meet these demands. Achieving spectral efficiencies of tens of bit/s/Hz is challenging under practical constraints, so the only option is to increase the available bandwidth to several tens of GHz. However, it is not feasible to identify such a large amount of spectrum in the regulated frequency bands below 300 GHz [11]. In order to meet the increasing traffic demands for wireless data, millimeter-wave (mmWave) technology, as the subsystem in the 30–100 GHz RF band, has become an indispensable tool for indoor and outdoor wireless communications. MmWave technology exploits the large, unused spectrum in the millimeter-wave bands, resulting in higher bandwidth, which allows for significantly faster data rates and a better capacity of the network in comparison to standard sub-6 GHz frequencies [13].
This promise has spurred the creation of a number of standards as a way to maximize mmWave communications in specific applications, such as IEEE 802.11ad and IEEE 802.11ay for fast wireless local area networking (WLANs), IEEE 802.15.3c for wireless personal area networking (WPANs), and the 5G new radio (NR) access networks specified by 3GPP [45]. The integration of mmWave technology into 5G networks has already demonstrated its ability to deliver ultra-high-speed wireless connectivity, low latency, and massive capacity, making it a cornerstone of modern communication systems. Applications including AR, VR, and real-time 4K/8K video streaming have highly leveraged the high throughput of mmWave. Therefore, mmWave is also essential to support dense urban deployments and the mass of device connectivity in IoT environments.
Nevertheless, while it has its advantages, mmWave technology also has inherent limitations that can restrict its performance in addressing the future requirements of wireless data traffic. As the high-frequency signals in the mmWave band are very sensitive to the propagation impairments of path loss, atmospheric absorption, and blockage from physical objects, like walls, trees, and even human bodies, they are very demanding. These problems lead to insufficient coverage and require the use of highly dense small-cell networks, sophisticated beamforming, and smart resource management in order to maintain stable communication links. Furthermore, as data traffic continues to grow exponentially, driven by emerging technologies such as holographic communication, autonomous vehicles, and industrial automation, even mmWave networks may struggle to provide the required performance levels. This deficiency highlights the demand for ad hoc solutions, such as THz communication, RIS, and new network structures (e.g., cell-free massive MIMO cell-to-cell/cell-free vs. integral satellite-terrestrial loops on cellular scales) [84].
The IEEE has developed a communication standard for the THz frequency range by establishing the IEEE 802.15.x standard. This standard is being developed to provide a framework for high-speed wireless communication using frequencies in the terahertz range [180]. The THz spectrum band is considered one of the most promising options for enabling ultra-high-speed communications beyond 5G. THz communication offers much higher data rates, ranging from tens of Gbps to several Tbps, compared to mmWave band communication. Additionally, THz communication systems are less affected by atmospheric conditions in outdoor wireless communications compared to wireless optical communication. In indoor wireless communications, the THz frequency band is easier to track and maintain beam alignment compared to the optical frequency band, which greatly enhances the mobility of wireless communication systems. Furthermore, THz communication systems have the advantage of utilizing reflection paths to improve link gains in indoor applications. Given these advantages, further research and development of THz communications are crucial for future advancements in this field [11].

6.1. Main Features and Specifications of THz Communications

The THz frequency band, spanning from 0.1 to 10 THz, offers an unprecedented amount of bandwidth, potentially reaching several terahertz. This huge spectral capacity can be used for very high data rates of terabits per second (Tbps), which is much better than that possible with mmWave technologies. With such ultra-high-speed communication, THz technology is considered a crucial facilitator for the evolution of next-generation wireless networks, especially to better satisfy the increasing need for data-intensive applications with holographic communications, real-time AI, and large-scale IoT ecosystems. The THz band has the following features that make it preferable for some communication situations and applications [11,83,117,118].
  • High directionality and security
    The directionality of THz signals is superior to mmWave signals because of the shorter wavelengths resulting in highly focused beams. Not only is spectral efficiency enhanced, but also the eavesdropping risk is decreased, making the whole communication secure.
  • Non-LOS (NLOS) propagation
    In contrast to optical frequencies, THz waves can support NLOS propagation due to scattering and diffraction, suitable for uplink communication or highly populated urban areas.
  • Resilience to weather conditions
    When THz signals work well under adverse weather conditions (fog, dust, and turbulence), then optical signals typically fail. This robustness ensures reliable communication in diverse environments.
  • Low ambient noise and health safety
    The THz band is, in principle, very free from ambient noise interference due to optical sources. Moreover, THz radiation is non-ionizing and thus safer than higher-energy frequency radiation and is not under the restrictive health and safety guidelines imposed on higher-energy frequencies.

6.2. Standardization Efforts in THz Communication

Standardization of THz technology has been a major thrust in order to facilitate global adoption and interoperability. The career started in 2008 with the establishment of the IEEE 802.15 Terahertz Interest Group and ended with the dissemination of IEEE Std 802.15.3d-2017, which introduced the first worldwide standard of wireless communications in the 252–321 GHz band. This milestone provided the basis for ultrawideband wireless links in the THz range and, therefore, addressed the increasing need for communication systems for ultra-broadband applications. Attempts are still underway to extend the range of THz technology. Active efforts are currently underway to increase the frequency range covered by the standard up to 450 GHz. At the same time, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) formed the Industry Specification Group on Terahertz (ISG THz) to provide a platform for coordinating pre-standardization R&D activities. This effort is a prelude to the planned 6G standardization, which will commence in 2025. The ISG THz has planned to integrate international development efforts in THz technology by providing solutions to the related challenges, including transceiver design efficiency, spectrum allocation, and integration with existing networks.
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) has played a key role in the global spectrum coordination and allocation for terahertz communication. The ITU’s actions are directed toward regulating and standardizing THz frequencies across a broad range to facilitate the seamless incorporation of future wireless communication systems. The key milestones toward THz standardization include the following.
(1)
World Radiocommunication Conferences (WRCs)
During the 2019 WRC (WRC-19), the ITU provisioned 160 GHz in the 252–450 GHz band for fixed and mobile services, with additional restrictions and security measures for passive services such as radio astronomy and Earth exploration satellite service providers. These assignments are intended to support high-speed wireless data transmission and industrial services without causing congestion to current services.
(2)
Spectrum Management Framework
The ITU Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) has conducted detailed studies to identify potential bands in the THz range that can be used without interfering with critical passive applications. ITU-R study groups have been intensively investigating the propagation nature of THz frequencies to best use them in different environments.
(3)
Coordination for 6G Integration
ITU is developing environments to embed THz communication into the developing IMT-2030/6G environment. These activities aim to specify use cases, performance requirements, and technical standards to be compatible with the global 6G visions.
The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), the standardization body for cellular technology, is at the advent of basic work for integrating THz frequencies into 5G Advanced and future 6G networks. Their contributions include the following:
(1)
5G advanced and release 20
In the current 3GPP Release 20 (6G forerunner), the standardization organization is exploring the use of frequencies above 100 GHz, such as THz bands. This includes examining their ability to deliver high data rates and ultra-low latency communication needed by high-speed communication and sensing, such as holographic and high-speed sensing.
(2)
Study on high-frequency spectrum
The 3GPP is conducting technical feasibility studies on how to address THz communication issues. This includes the following.
  • Developing strategies to avoid high propagation loss, such as beamforming, beam tracking, and ultra-dense networks.
  • Overcoming hardware limitations by improving the efficiency of transceivers and antennas used at THz frequencies.
  • Interference management and ensuring coexistence with other systems.
(3)
Support for new use cases
The 3GPP is coordinating its work on THz-based communication with the new applications for future 5G and 6G (e.g., immersive AR, VR, autonomous vehicle network, and smart city applications).
(4)
Channel modeling and performance evaluation
As part of the 3GPP study agenda, channel models are being developed for THz frequencies, which include diffraction, scattering, and atmospheric absorption. These models play an important role in designing practical THz communication systems.
The ITU and 3GPP are working with other global organizations, including the ETSI ISG THz, and IEEE, to achieve global consistency of Terahertz communication standards. These efforts aim to promote efficient spectrum usage, develop scalable hardware and software solutions, and contribute to the smooth introduction of THz communication into the 6G world. The planned 6G standardization, starting as early as 2025, will extend these foundational activities and become a sediment in the future of wireless communication, with THz transmission playing a leading role.

6.3. Applications of THz Communications

THz offers various applications and benefits across different domains. It enables Terabit cellular hotspots, providing high-throughput connectivity for densely populated areas and specific locations. Terabit campus/private networks leverage THz frequencies for ultra-high-rate, low-latency connectivity within private networks, supporting Industry 4.0 and Tactile Internet applications. THz communications enable direct Tbps links between devices in close proximity, facilitating device-to-device connections and V2X scenarios. Security in THz communications is enhanced through large-scale antenna arrays and spread spectrum techniques, although unique challenges need to be addressed. THz wireless backhaul reduces installation costs and improves coverage in areas where fiber connections are challenging. Finally, THz nano-communications enable wireless connections among nanoscale devices and have applications in health monitoring, defense, Internet-of-Nano-Things, and on-chip communication [11].
THz communications have the potential to be used in various applications. One of the initial applications could be a fixed wireless link that enhances the capacity of wireless network backbones in outdoor environments. Another application is the use of THz nano cells in a hierarchical cellular network, providing high capacity in specific hotspots. However, these applications require significant technical requirements. THz also has potential for WLAN/WPAN applications. It can also be used for high-capacity wireless links between computer peripherals on a desktop or for kiosk downloading, enabling quick content transfer from a dedicated kiosk to a mobile device. These applications have less demanding propagation conditions [181]. THz radiation, which is non-ionizing and safe for humans, has gained interest in biological and medical applications. It is highly sensitive to water content and has been used for THz spectroscopy and imaging in cancer detection, including skin cancer and various other tumor types. THz imaging offers complementary spectral information and is considered safe for widespread deployment, aiding surgical procedures and decision-making. Table 23 provides preliminary 6G applications that can use THz benefits.

6.4. Challenges with THz

THz communication is going to play a key role in 6G networks, which can provide unprecedented bandwidth and a high data transfer rate that can satisfy the new generation’s applications, such as holographic communications, real-time digital twins, and super large MTC. However, despite their high potential, THz communications are still subjected to several critical issues that need to be addressed before their successful application. Collaborative efforts from the research community are required to tackle these obstacles and successfully implement THz communications. Designing the THz MAC system presents additional challenges due to the unique characteristics of THz communications. These challenges include addressing the “deafness” problem, which refers to the difficulty of receiving signals in THz frequency ranges. Additionally, complex operations such as network discovery and coupling need to be managed, and efficient concurrent transmission scheduling techniques must be developed [11].
Due to the absence of THz transceivers, hardware design for THz communications is a significant challenge. The THz band has been relatively unexplored in the electromagnetic spectrum, but technological advancements are making THz communication a reality. Generating THz signals poses unique challenges as the frequency range is too high for electronics-based devices and too low for photonics-based devices. Currently, THz signals are generated through frequency multiplication or photomixing. Graphene-based technology shows promise for generating THz signals due to the exceptional properties of graphene. THz signals can be pulsed or continuous, with pulsed signals being extensively studied in existing research. However, continuous signals require more complex and larger transmitters/antennas, requiring further research for future THz communications [83]. The key challenges with THz communications for 6G include the following.
  • Path loss and absorption:
    Path loss remains a primary challenge in THz communication. The free-space path loss (FSPL) at THz frequencies is much worse than during the microwave and mmWave ranges due to the raised carrier frequency and the high inverse-square law during propagation [118]. The loss is defined by Friis’ equation as follows:
    F S P L ( d B ) = 20 log 10 4 π d f / C ,
    where d stands for distance, f is the carrier frequency, and C represents the speed of light. The path loss worsens significantly with frequencies moving toward the THz domain (0.1–10 THz). This renders long-range communication virtually impossible unless measures are implemented. Furthermore, Table 24 provides the typical path loss at different frequencies in the THz range. The table shows that there is unequivocal evidence suggesting the growth of device path loss with an increase in frequency and distance, which results in ineffective traditional wireless communication methods for THz implementations.
    Due to their relatively short wavelengths and higher frequencies, THz waves are hindered by severe propagation loss. Atmospheric attenuation caused by molecular absorption, particularly water vapor and oxygen, further exacerbates this issue, limiting the effective communication range. Unlike lower frequency bands, THz waves experience a high degree of attenuation owing to absorption from atmospheric gases, especially water vapor (H2O), oxygen (O2), and carbon dioxide (CO2). The communication range is further narrowed by molecular absorption in lower effectiveness. Different frequencies that have specific absorption peaks also restrict the available spectral windows, resulting in little reliable THz communication [119]. For instance, at approximately 1 THz, the absorption level can reach tens and, at times, hundreds of dB/km, making long-range communication impractical without some form of relay or amplification strategies.
    Absorption changes immensely with frequency, which implies that water vapor is predominant for many of them. Certain frequencies possessing high absorption coefficients must be chosen cautiously, which makes these spectral planning windows for practical THz communication extremely limited. To address this challenge, next-generation applications need ultra-directional antennas, high-gain beamforming, multi-hop relaying, and tunable intelligent surfaces to efficiently direct and steer THz beams.
  • Limited communication range: Due to the high attenuation of THz signals, long-distance communication is difficult. This limits their utility in scenarios requiring extensive coverage, such as rural and remote areas. Hybrid network structures combining THz communication with established mmWave and sub-6 GHz technologies have the potential to provide extended coverage and continue to support high-speed links in saturated-situated areas.
  • Complex hardware requirements: THz signal generation, modulation, and detection are possible with special-purpose tools, such as photonic and electronic transceivers. These devices need to be highly accurate and efficient simultaneously, which adds complexity and expense. Continuous advancements in semiconductor materials (e.g., graphene and indium phosphide) and the development of compact, energy-efficient transceivers are essential to address this limitation.
  • Power consumption and energy efficiency: Due to the high-power demands of THz production and amplification, energy consumption can be quite large. This particularly concerns mobile and battery-powered devices. Developing energy-efficient THz devices and low-power modulation is of the utmost importance to make THz communications feasible.
  • Interference management: Large-scale deployment of THz communication nodes in 6G networks may cause interference, especially in urban scenes. High-performance interference mitigation, such as AI-assisted network control and dynamic spectrum assignment, is required to guarantee effective communication.
  • Integration with 6G ecosystem: The ubiquitous integration of THz communication with other 6G technologies, including AI, QC, and massive IoT, presents technical and standardization issues. International standardization bodies, research establishments, and industry partners must create a common set of frameworks that allow THz to be introduced uniformly.
To address these challenges, some current research and development work has been directed toward innovations in THz devices, adaptive beamforming algorithms, and a framework for cooperation in communication. Furthermore, the integration of THz communication with other means, such as optical wireless communication and satellite systems, can overcome such limitations and make light of its potential. By addressing these obstacles, THz communications can become a critical enabler of the high-speed, ultra-reliable, and low-latency capabilities envisioned for 6G networks.

6.5. Multi-Hop Relaying in THz Networks

Multi-hop relaying has been proposed as a practical solution to mitigate the challenges posed by path loss and absorption. This method sends data from a source to a destination through one or more sequentially connected relay nodes. Each relay unit reduces the level of signal attenuation, processes and forwards the signal, and thus guarantees complete terminal connectivity. This distance reduction helps cover a lower transmission distance, which lowers overall path loss and absorption. THz networks have three common relaying methods: amplify-and-forward (AF), decode-and-forward (DF), and hybrid relaying. In AF, the relay accepts the information signal, amplifies it, and sends it to the next node [182]. Although the operation is simple, AF can also amplify noise, which can lead to a loss in quality. While in DF, the signal is decoded, processed, and then sent out as a clean signal at the second node. This ensures better quality signals, but a processing delay occurs. Hybrid relaying employs a mix of AF and DF that implements the most efficient method dynamically depending on the state of the channels.
  • Multi-hop relaying offers several benefits for THz communications, including the following [182,183].
  • Reducing path loss effects by breaking the communication link into shorter segments; each transmission experiences less attenuation, which enhances overall signal strength.
  • Overcoming molecular absorption peaks since relays can be strategically positioned to help signals bypass high absorption frequencies, thus selecting the best THz windows.
  • Multi-hop relaying can greatly increase the communication range, making THz technology more applicable in real-world scenarios.
  • Shortening the distance between nodes improves signal reception, which lowers bit error rates and boosts overall link robustness.
The placement of relay nodes must be optimized to ensure the effectiveness of multi-hop relaying. Key factors that influence placement include distance between relays, environmental factors, and energy constraints. Shorter distances can reduce path loss but may require more relays, raising deployment costs and complexity. Also, relays should be located in areas with minimal obstructions and lower atmospheric absorption. THz communication demands high power, making it essential to use energy-efficient relays or integrate them with energy-harvesting technologies. Furthermore, advanced routing algorithms and beamforming techniques can further improve the efficiency of multi-hop relaying in THz networks [119]. AI-driven algorithms can adaptively modify relay positions and routes based on real-time network conditions. Furthermore, highly directional antennas can concentrate energy in specific directions, reducing interference and enhancing transmission efficiency. Another effective strategy for making THz communication feasible is to combine it with mmWave systems. A hybrid model that utilizes THz for ultra-high-speed, short-range connections while mmWave manages longer distances can establish a more practical framework for wireless communication.

7. Intelligent Reflection Surface

Current wireless technologies struggle to meet the demands posed by upcoming technological advancements such as AI-powered communication, IoT, VR, autonomous vehicles, connected health, and smart cities. To support data-intensive applications, future wireless systems, including 5G and beyond, must significantly enhance their capacity. The evolution of 5G and its successors necessitates fundamental shifts in communication methodologies to address requirements like high-speed data transfer, increased device density, and the integration of multiple antennas at BSs [60]. The varied necessities of IoT and MTC call for reduced latency, lower power consumption, and the provision of diverse service types. Fifth-generation does not rely on a single technology to sustain all its applications, and the rapid proliferation of mobile IoT devices presents a challenge in efficiently meeting their demands. Hence, efforts focused on optimizing energy and spectral efficiency become critical for improved data rates and enhanced UE quality.
At present, wireless communication functions within sub-6 GHz bands. To fully exploit the capabilities of 5G and beyond, the ITU has sanctioned frequencies in the millimeter wave band (10 GHz to 70 GHz) [61]. This change is expected to increase bandwidth by a hundredfold. Previously, these frequencies were deemed inadequate for mobile communications due to obstacles like path loss, atmospheric disruption, and high expenses. However, progress in semiconductor technology has alleviated these constraints, enabling improved transmission despite obstacles such as object obstruction and human interference. Specific frequencies in this range encounter absorption issues from gases (e.g., oxygen) at 60 GHz [60]. Unforeseeable radio environments impede wireless network optimization, resulting in signal problems like reflection and fading, limiting the efficiency of wireless networks. Implementing large antenna arrays with beamforming techniques, particularly in mmWave bands, helps address these hurdles by directing energy more efficiently. Despite advancements, coverage from outdoors to indoors in mmWave bands remains limited, and signal attenuation intensifies with higher frequencies, especially during rain.
IRS is a cutting-edge technology that shows promise in mitigating wireless channel propagation challenges. Recent advancements in metamaterials have propelled IRS into the spotlight within academia and industry. The terminology related to IRS includes various terms such as RIS, passive intelligent surface (PIS), software-defined metasurface (SDMS), large intelligent metasurface (LIMS), large intelligent surface (LIS), smart reflect arrays, and passive holographic MIMO (HMIMO). These terms essentially refer to the same technology [184]. IRS is a created surface made of electromagnetic material called a metasurface. It is a two-dimensional structure composed of many passive elements that scatter signals. Each scattering element has a unique physical structure. Through software control, these scattering elements can be manipulated to change the electromagnetic properties. By collectively controlling the phase of all the scattering components, the phases and angles of the incoming RF signals can be adjusted to create a beneficial multipath effect. This means that the reflected RF signals can be combined in a way that increases the power of the received signal, or they can be combined in a way that reduces interference.
IRS is a multi-layered structure designed to enhance wireless communication. It consists of three layers: an exterior interaction layer, a signal integrity layer, and a control and phase adjustment layer. The exterior interaction layer is the outermost part of the IRS and can comprise single or multiple layers. It contains reflective elements embedded in a dielectric material, which interact with incoming electromagnetic signals. The signal integrity layer in the middle is made of a copper sheet that acts as a shield to prevent signal or energy leakage. It ensures that the signal remains intact and directed without any loss. At the core of the IRS, the control and phase adjustment layer is a circuit board responsible for precise adjustments of the reflective elements’ phase. An intelligent controller, such as an FPGA, is used to modify the phase of the components based on received signals. This level of control allows the IRS to effectively manipulate the propagation of the signal [185].
Integrating IRS into wireless communication systems offers a wide range of benefits, transforming the landscape of modern networks. One of the primary advantages is the ease of deployment and sustainable operation. IRS devices, due to their small form factor, being passive and modular, can be easily deployed in a variety of environments (urban, suburban, remote) without the need for extensive infrastructure changes. This renders them a potentially useful option for the development of green communication systems to reduce environmental footprint. In addition, IRS technologies offer unprecedented degrees of freedom to restructure the wireless propagation environment by means of passive beamforming. Through freely altering the phase shifts in the received signals, IRS is able to intelligently steer the direction and quality of wireless links, improving the robustness and reconfigurability of the wireless network to varying user needs. This ability increases system-wide efficiency and thus supports the utilization of existing spectrum; thereby, IRS serves as a major building block for energy- and spectral-efficient communications systems.
Along with these main advantages, IRS-based systems dramatically decrease power consumption and improve network performance by effectively utilizing available power, making them an important aspect of the emergence of sustainable and energy-efficient wireless networks. That decrease in power consumption not only reduces operational costs but also fits in with global initiatives to become carbon neutral. Additionally, the IRS’s special characteristics have also drawn some new research avenues in wireless communication. These include the development of state-of-the-art applications (such as wireless power transfer, secure communication, and uRLLC). The IRS is in a leading position to investigate new technologies such as holographic communications, autonomous networks, and intelligent roadways.

7.1. IRS-Assisted 6G Communication System

IRSs have been developed to address the diverse and demanding requirements of upcoming 6G wireless communication scenarios. In immersive communication, these surfaces provide state-of-the-art solutions for long-reality (XR) and ultra-high-definition (UHD) visual streaming. Due to the high-beamforming gain and the introduction of additional propagation paths, IRSs can effectively compensate for path loss and overcome physical constraints, leading to a clutter-free user experience for latency-sensitive and bandwidth-heavy applications. IRSs have proven very relevant for critical applications in hyper-reliable and low-latency communication applications, from industry automation to telemedicine to emergency response services. Developing dominant LOS paths and filtering out unwanted multipath fading improve channel quality and transmission robustness. Reliability and low latency are paramount in highly dynamic environments, such as fully autonomous driving. IRSs can be strategically deployed by the roadside to amplify signal strength for vehicles and passengers or mounted directly on vehicles to counteract rapid channel fading caused by high mobility. This versatility renders IRSs the key component for developing robust vehicular communication [10].
Besides these applications, the IRS plays a critical role in mMTC for smart cities, environmental monitoring systems, and the IoT. Through intelligently designed reflections and the use of state-of-the-art multiple access schemes, such as non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), the IRSs contribute to higher system throughput and fair resource allocation between a large number of densely deployed IoT devices [184]. Refraction-based IRSs also provide signal-extending capabilities, allowing more device connectivity and, thus, ubiquitous connectivity in 6G networks. The IRS technology also presents new horizons in three emerging 6G scenes, which expand beyond their existing applications. Large-aperture IRSs enable high data rates and QoS, which in turn cater to emerging communication and computing applications such as distributed AI, edge computing, and digital twins. IRSs with AI-based optimized approaches, e.g., deep learning algorithms, enhance performance compared to the classic techniques used for beamforming, user association, and channel estimation.
To achieve ubiquity, IRSs can be mounted on mobile platforms, such as UAVs, high-altitude balloons, or satellites, providing coverage to remote and less-served areas. This deployment strategy is useful for maintaining a reliable and uninterrupted communication link in complex environments, e.g., rural areas, maritime areas, or disaster zones. In cell-edge conditions, IRSs suppress intra-cell interference and enhance signal-to-noise ratio in low-network-coverage regions. This is particularly useful in THz and mmWave communication bands, where signal jams and path loss are major problems. With the deployment of the IRSs at the cell edges or BS locations, the networks can decrease path loss and maintain good connectivity across more extensive regions.
IRS deployments are immensely flexible and can be configured according to application/environment requirements. In indoor settings, IRSs can be strategically placed on walls, ceilings, or furniture to enhance signal coverage and network capacity. In the case of multi-platform outdoor scenarios, IRSs can be mounted on high-speed cars, UAVs, satellites, or building surfaces to fully exploit the high spectral efficiency and reliable communication capability. At the BS end, in some cases, IRSs can be combined to maximize the beamforming and reduce the effect of distance-dependent path loss [186]. The deployment strategy of IRSs depends on various important issues, such as channel conditions, network coverage requirements, passive beamforming ability, and signaling overhead. By leveraging these factors, IRS technology can optimize wireless communication networks to meet the stringent requirements of 6G, including ultra-reliability, high data rates, low latency, and massive connectivity. As a result, IRSs are poised to play a transformative role in shaping the future of wireless communication systems.

7.2. Challenges with IRS

One of the main challenges in implementing IRS-assisted 6G networks is the development of adjustable elements. Continuously modifying the reflection coefficients of each element can significantly enhance network performance. However, this approach is often cost-prohibitive due to the intricate design and expensive hardware required for the large, high-precision components. A further difficulty in implementing IRS-assisted 6G networks is the creation of a productive control mechanism for connecting and communicating with the numerous tunable elements, allowing for flexible and coordinated manipulation of their EM properties when required. Despite numerous proposed control mechanisms thus far, the problem still persists [184]. IRS without radio frequency chains cannot perform baseband processing. As a result, traditional training-based methods cannot separately estimate the channels between the transmitter and IRS, as well as the IRS and receiver.
Several studies have proposed alternative methods to estimate these channels more efficiently. However, the sparsity and other properties of IRS-reflected channels in real-world environments remain largely unknown, indicating a need for a comprehensive channel estimation framework. Moreover, the close relationship between transmit power and reflection coefficients complicates the optimization of channel assignment, power allocation, and reflection coefficients in IRS systems, making efficient resource allocation a significant challenge [185]. The current research on how the IRS can provide widespread connectivity is still in the early stages of theory. To prove the practical efficiency of this technology, more prototypes must be created to demonstrate how it works. The development of 6G holographic communication with the help of the IRS also has key issues that need to be resolved, including 3D holographic imaging and the mechanism for reconstructing EM waves. Additionally, installing IRS on buildings in urban areas involves coordinating with various units and property managers, leading to potential conflicts of interest between network operators and equipment providers. These factors present significant challenges for the commercialization of this technology. Summing up, Table 25 summarizes recent studies on IRS and UAV as key enabling technologies of 6G.

7.3. Real-World Implementation Constraints of IRS Phase Control

IRS comprises numerous reconfigurable passive elements, usually built from meta-materials, which can alter the phase and amplitude of incoming electromagnetic waves. The overall phase shift introduced by an IRS element can be expressed as follows.
θ i = e j i ,         i 0,2 π ,
where θi is the complex reflection coefficient of the ith IRS element, and ϕi is the applied phase shift. However, in practical applications, the phase shifts are limited by hardware constraints, resulting in quantized phase shift models. Rather than allowing for continuous phase shifts, practical IRS implementations can only accommodate a limited number of discrete phase levels due to hardware limitations [184]. The number of quantization bits (b) determines the number of phase levels as follows: N = 2b. Thus, increasing the number of quantization bits enhances IRS performance but also raises hardware complexity and power consumption.
Despite its theoretical benefits, IRS technology faces several real-world implementation challenges, including hardware limitations, control latency and power consumption, environmental factors, and channel estimation and optimization complexity.
(a)
Hardware limitations
Several hardware limitations affect the performance of the IRS, including the following [184,185].
  • Most IRS hardware can only manage a small number of discrete phase shift levels (for instance, 2-bit or 3-bit phase control), which can reduce performance.
  • Real-world IRS elements often introduce amplitude attenuation alongside phase modulation, which diminishes overall efficiency.
  • Variations in manufacturing processes can lead to deviations from the ideal phase shifts, impacting the effectiveness of beamforming.
(b)
Control latency and power consumption
Switching between different phase states in diodes or MEMS-based IRS elements creates delays, which can limit adaptability in rapidly changing wireless environments. Although IRS is primarily passive, active components like controllers and tuning circuits require power, particularly in designs with high-bit quantization.
(c)
Environmental factors
The performance of phase-shifting components can fluctuate with temperature changes, resulting in phase drifting over time. Furthermore, IRS systems depend on LoS or near-line-of-sight paths; obstacles such as buildings and moving people can negatively impact performance.
(d)
Complexity in channel estimation and optimization
As the IRS does not have active transmission capabilities, accurately estimating CSI can be quite challenging. Also, the IRS is limited by scalability issues. Optimizing phase shifts for large-scale IRS deployments that involve thousands of elements demands considerable computational resources [185].
Table 26 compares the key technologies for IRS phase control. Several strategies can help address phase control limitations in practical IRS implementations. Deploying a hybrid active–passive IRS can provide a key solution. This can be achieved by adding a few active components to an IRS array, which can enhance flexibility in phase control. Creating new materials with better tunability and lower losses is another solution that can improve IRS performance. Furthermore, innovative algorithms, e.g., compressive sensing, can minimize the burden of channel estimation. Also, AI-driven methods can assist in optimizing discrete phase settings in real-world scenarios.

8. Swarm Drones

Swarm drones, which involve the coordinated operation of multiple UAVs are emerging as a critical technology for 6G networks, playing a pivotal role in enabling ultra-reliable, low-latency communication, and intelligent network management. While a single UAV is effective for small-scale missions, its limitations in sensing capabilities, and potential as a single point of failure highlight the advantages of using UAV swarms. Swarms offer enhanced intelligence, improved coordination, increased flexibility, survivability, and reconfigurability, making them more suitable for large-scale missions. In a swarm, UAVs operate autonomously, communicating and making decisions based on information from neighboring drones. This complex system requires the integration of several subsystems, including optimal trajectory planning, localization, and task coordination, to ensure seamless operation and achieve mission objectives efficiently [200]. As 6G networks evolve, swarm drones are expected to become indispensable, driving the future of wireless communication and network infrastructure through their transformative capabilities.
Two primary strategies are employed in managing UAV swarm formations: centralized and distributed control. Centralized control involves a single authoritative entity, such as a ground station or a powerful UAV. The swarm control component acts as the intelligence or brain of the swarm. It collects information from all agents in the field and determines the direction the system should take and the formation it should adopt [200]. This approach offers optimized performance due to its global perspective but is vulnerable to failure if the central controller is compromised. Within centralized control, the leader–follower method is commonly used, where one UAV leads while others maintain specific distances. This can be static, with a consistent leader, or dynamic, where leadership changes based on the situation. While effective, it risks mission failure if the leader is lost and may suffer from communication overhead. Conversely, distributed control eliminates the need for a central authority. Each UAV optimizes control commands for itself and its nearest neighbor, but it executes its own controls independently at each time step [201]. This strategy enhances resilience and adaptability in dynamic environments but presents challenges in implementation.
Effective communication is vital for the success of swarm drone networks, involving both intra-swarm (i.e., drone-to-drone) and inter-swarm (i.e., drone-to-ground control) interactions. Various communication topologies (e.g., ring, star, mesh, and fully connected) are used, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. For example, ring and star topologies are simpler but prone to single points of failure, while mesh and fully connected topologies provide greater resilience. Routing protocols are critical for efficient data transmission in dynamic environments. Conventional protocols (e.g., static, proactive, reactive, and hybrid) are designed for static networks and often fall short in UAV applications. Modified protocols (e.g., LCAD routing and ML-OLSR) address these limitations by incorporating mobility and load factors. Position-based routing, such as GPSR, relies on geographical data but struggles with environmental obstacles. Intelligence-based routing, leveraging AI, offers adaptive solutions but demands significant computational resources [202].

8.1. Swarm Drones as a Key Technology of 6G

A significant challenge in managing a swarm of drones is ensuring effective guidance—coordinating the movements of multiple drones to achieve a specific objective. Swarm systems often include mechanisms to prevent collisions with other agents and obstacles while navigating toward a target or maintaining a designated group formation [202]. Recently, bio-inspired algorithms have gained prominence as a promising approach for controlling drone swarms. These algorithms draw inspiration from the collective behaviors observed in social animals, such as insects, fish, and bird flocks. Their advantage lies in their ability to adapt rapidly to changing environments and self-organize into complex patterns.
Furthermore, RL integration enables UAV swarms to optimize behavior by using surrounding information to determine appropriate actions. Each UAV learns to recognize the situation required to achieve the swarm’s goal and takes the most optimal action. By leveraging the efficient self-UAV swarm network (ESUSN) and multi-agent RL (MARL), this approach improves mission performance, communication efficiency, and collision avoidance, combining RL and optimized network algorithms to enhance overall swarm operations [200]. Swarm drones can be deployed for 6G networks to achieve the following.
(a)
Enhanced connectivity and coverage
Swarm drones act as mobile base stations, extending network coverage in areas where traditional infrastructure is unavailable or inefficient. This is particularly beneficial in remote, disaster-struck, or densely populated urban regions. Swarm drones offer dynamic coverage control, which involves designing strategies for mobile sensing agents equipped with limited-range sensors to explore a specific area and ensure that every point within the domain achieves a predefined level of coverage. They enable LOS communication in the sub-THz band, which is a cornerstone of 6G for high-speed data transmission.
(b)
Dynamic disaster monitoring
In disaster scenarios, single-UAV systems often encounter challenges like unstable communication links and insufficient coverage of large, complex areas. Swarm drone systems provide a more effective alternative by utilizing collaborative networks to improve redundancy, reliability, and scalability. These systems implement distributed architectures, including multi-star, mesh, and hierarchical mesh topologies, allowing UAVs to communicate, exchange information, and adjust strategies in real-time. Mesh networks stand out due to their self-forming and self-healing properties, ensuring high scalability and adaptability in dynamic disaster conditions. Hierarchical and clustered mesh networks enhance coordination by structuring UAVs into layers or clusters, with specific leaders managing communication within and between clusters. Supported by 6G connectivity, these systems enable efficient disaster response through enhanced monitoring, search and rescue operations, and real-time decision-making, ensuring a robust and flexible approach to emergency management.
(c)
Transformative applications
Swarm drones have transformative potential across various sectors, including civilian and military domains.
  • Civilian applications: Swarm drones are poised to revolutionize industries such as agriculture through precision farming and logistics via efficient package delivery and infrastructure inspection. In public safety, they are invaluable for search and rescue operations, especially in disaster zones where they can provide real-time image and video data. Additionally, drones are increasingly utilized for wireless connectivity and traffic management, further expanding their scope in civilian life.
  • Military applications: In military contexts, swarm drones are instrumental in reducing risks to human pilots, as they can effectively handle surveillance, reconnaissance, and battlefield communication tasks. They also support advanced defense strategies, such as swarm-based systems, that enhance operational effectiveness.
(d)
Energy efficiency
Integrating small UAVs into 6G networks presents significant challenges due to their limited onboard resources, including battery life, storage capacity, and computational capabilities. Given the impracticality of mid-flight battery replacements, effectively managing these resources to meet the demands of resource-intensive applications is crucial. Furthermore, the substantial data collected by these UAVs during monitoring tasks may exceed their processing and storage capacities, highlighting the need for efficient data management strategies. A key focus in UAV network design is energy efficiency, as energy leaks during communication can degrade network throughput. Traditional configurations, where a UAV transmits at a fixed power level to all nearby UAVs, ensure stability but are inefficient, leading to unnecessary energy consumption. To address this, researchers are exploring strategies like dynamic power adjustment and adaptive communication protocols to reduce energy waste while maintaining performance.
UAV networks can be managed through centralized or distributed approaches. In a centralized system, a global controller manages transmission power, reducing routing overhead and power consumption but potentially compromising stability due to limited routing options. In contrast, a distributed topology allows each UAV to independently regulate its power, optimizing energy use and ensuring robustness.

8.2. Integration with 6G Technologies

A.
Terahertz communication
Sixth-generation technology necessitates advanced applications to manage massive data volumes, delivering extremely high throughput per device (ranging from Gbps to Tbps) and exceptional area efficiency (measured in bps/km²). To meet these requirements, THz technology is anticipated to bridge the gap between mmWave and optical communication bands. The IEEE 802.15.3d-2017 standard, established in 2017, marked a milestone as the first wireless communication standard operating at carrier frequencies near 300 GHz. Furthermore, the growing number of mobile and fixed users across private, industrial, and service sectors will drive the demand for communication speeds reaching hundreds of Gbps for both backhaul and fronthaul. Achieving ultra-high data rates (targeting 1 Tbps) over distances of several kilometers will be a critical requirement in such scenarios [11].
Swarm drones can leverage the THz spectrum’s high bandwidth for ultra-fast data transmission, particularly at altitudes above 16 km, where environmental moisture has minimal impact. THz technology is well suited for high-altitude platforms (HAPs) and high-mobility UAV environments, as its high-frequency signals are less affected by the Doppler effect. By optimizing beam patterns, THz communications enable high-speed links. At the same time, THz MIMO-OFDM systems can achieve millimeter-level accuracy in UAV position and orientation estimation at close transmitter-receiver distances. For secure operations, the narrow beams of THz signals reduce eavesdropping risks, and the extensive bandwidth offers resilience against jamming and other attacks. Additionally, THz links can facilitate communication between UAVs and airplanes and support HAPs as relay nodes connecting ground stations to aircraft, ensuring reliable and secure short-range and long-range data exchange.
B.
AI and ML
AI algorithms play a pivotal role in enabling swarm drones to autonomously navigate, communicate, and collaborate, making them integral to intelligent 6G networks. By mimicking human intelligence, AI enhances UAV swarm systems’ ability to operate effectively in dynamic and complex environments, facilitating real-time decision-making and autonomous operations. ML, a key subset of AI, empowers UAVs to learn from their surroundings and adapt over time. Techniques such as RL, neural networks, clustering, and support vector machines are crucial for optimizing UAV trajectories, coordination, and efficiency. These methods enable precise path planning, real-time navigation, and obstacle avoidance, ensuring drones can adapt to unforeseen challenges [203].
AI/ML further enhances collaborative sensing by improving data acquisition and processing, supporting efficient task distribution among drones, and maximizing resource utilization. Recent advancements demonstrate how AI/ML techniques drive innovation in UAV swarm systems, fostering significant improvements across diverse applications, from disaster management to surveillance and beyond.
C.
Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC)
To improve efficiency and lower costs in 6G, ISAC is being merged with drone swarms. Unlike conventional systems that treat sensing and communication separately, ISAC combines these functions, allowing communication signals to also serve sensing needs. This integration is especially important for applications like autonomous vehicle positioning, which is a fundamental component of the advancement of 6G [204].
D.
Blockchain
Integrating blockchain technology with 6G communication in UAV networks significantly enhances cybersecurity and performance. Blockchain’s core features, immutability, decentralization, and transparency provide critical benefits for UAV operations on 5G and 6G networks. Immutability ensures that data remain unaltered through irreversible hash functions, offering a secure and reliable method for storing and exchanging large data volumes. Decentralization eliminates reliance on central authorities by using consensus algorithms (e.g., PoW), enhancing security, reducing single points of failure, and enabling a robust, low-latency database platform. Transparency fosters trust by allowing network participants to view and validate transaction records, improving node cooperation and ensuring data integrity.
These blockchain properties further enhance UAV-6G communication networks by enabling secure spectrum sharing between network operators and UAV service providers, ensuring privacy through distributed information sharing, and mitigating risks posed by malicious nodes. In addition, blockchain-enabled 6G UAV networks can leverage edge computing platforms and core networks to bolster security and adaptability.
E.
Edge computing
Swarm drones are becoming essential components of MEC networks, particularly in enhancing the capabilities of 6G systems. These UAVs can function as backup MEC nodes in scenarios where traditional base stations are damaged or inaccessible, such as during natural disasters. Controlled by ground stations, drones leverage dynamic trajectories to optimize computation offloading and caching services, making them highly effective for critical applications in crowded areas and complex terrains like deserts, oceans, and wilderness. MEC integration with UAVs focuses on two primary strategies: path planning for computation offloading and resource allocation. Path planning strategies optimize UAV trajectories to minimize task latency and energy consumption, ensuring efficient operations in dynamic environments. Resource allocation strategies, on the other hand, focus on minimizing latency by effectively distributing communication and computing resources to connected devices. While resource allocation works well in static environments, it faces challenges in dynamic settings with high user mobility.
By integrating MEC platforms, UAVs bring cloud services closer to end users, reducing latency for compute-intensive tasks such as augmented reality and real-time analytics. This capability is especially critical during emergencies when traditional infrastructure is unavailable. The advancements position UAV-assisted MEC as a transformative solution for disaster response, resource management, and real-time decision-making in next-generation communication systems.

8.3. Handover Management for Swarm Drones

Handover management is essential for maintaining seamless communication and coordination in swarm drone networks, especially as drones transition between coverage areas or communication nodes, such as base stations, satellites, or other drones. The dynamic nature of drone flight and the need for continuous connectivity and scalability in large-scale operations make effective handovers critical to ensuring uninterrupted task execution, minimal latency, and reliable swarm performance. A handover, or handoff, is a core mobility technique in mobile networks, enabling UE to maintain connectivity while switching between BSs. In drone networks, this process faces additional complexity due to the rapid and dynamic movement of aerial vehicles, high altitudes, and differing operational requirements compared to ground-based users. Drones may serve dual roles: providing network access to terrestrial users or acting as UEs themselves, receiving services from BSs or satellites.
The performance of handover management in drone networks is influenced by factors such as drone mobility, limited power, coverage constraints, and network traffic demands. Traditional handover techniques, such as those used in MANETs and VANETs, are insufficient for drone networks and require adaptation. In MANETs, frequent node separation and merging pose challenges, while drone networks require solutions tailored to their high mobility and dynamic radio environments. The handover procedure in 6G is a critical advancement designed to ensure seamless connectivity for the UE as it transitions between cells or communication nodes. Building on 5G principles, 6G introduces advanced mechanisms to address challenges like ultra-high mobility, ultra-dense networks, and the integration of terrestrial and non-terrestrial systems (e.g., satellites, drones, and high-altitude platforms). These innovations are essential to meet the demands of next-generation networks, which require dynamic, low latency, and highly reliable communication. The 6G handover process involves the following key steps [205].
  • Measurement report: The UE continuously monitors network metrics (e.g., signal strength, latency, interference) and sends detailed reports to the serving BS (S-BS). AI models predict handover needs based on UE mobility and environmental changes.
  • Handover decision: The S-BS uses machine learning to evaluate the need for a handover to the target BS (T-BS), considering factors like network load, service quality, and UE trajectory.
  • Handover request: The S-BS sends a request to the T-BS, including UE state, resource requirements, and movement predictions.
  • Acknowledgment: The T-BS assesses its resources using AI-driven allocation and confirms its ability to accommodate the UE, ensuring optimal load distribution.
  • Handover initiation: The T-BS provides the UE with configuration details (e.g., frequency band, timing adjustments) to establish a connection.
  • Uplink allocation: The T-BS allocates uplink resources and sends synchronization information to the UE for uninterrupted communication.
  • Path update: The T-BS updates core network functions (e.g., NG-AMF) and adjusts the data routing path via the user plane function (UPF). AI and edge computing minimize latency during this process.
  • Completion notification: The T-BS notifies the S-BS of the handover’s completion, and the S-BS releases the UE’s resources, ensuring a seamless transition.

8.4. Challenges with Swarm Drones

Swarm drones in 6G networks face several critical challenges that demand innovative solutions for efficient and reliable performance. High mobility and dynamic environments, such as disaster zones, make maintaining stable, low-latency communication difficult. Scalability further complicates operations, as managing large swarms requires advanced resource allocation and network coordination. Limited energy resources in drones exacerbate these challenges, as continuous communication, computation, and mobility drain battery life rapidly. Reliable real-time decision-making, essential for collective intelligence and instant data sharing, hinges on ultra-low latency and high reliability. Network resilience is another critical factor, particularly in disaster-stricken or remote areas lacking infrastructure, where drones must maintain autonomous operations and connectivity.
Security and privacy also pose significant concerns, requiring robust defenses against cyberattacks, data breaches, and privacy violations, especially in sensitive missions. Integrating swarm drones with non-terrestrial networks, like satellites, adds complexity, necessitating seamless handovers and coordination for uninterrupted operations. Moreover, the computational demands of advanced AI algorithms for swarm coordination, path optimization, and adaptive decision-making must align with the limited onboard resources of drones. Standardization and interoperability are crucial for widespread adoption, demanding unified protocols and compatibility across diverse drone models, communication technologies, and network architectures. Addressing these challenges will rely on advancements in 6G technologies, such as AI-driven network management, edge computing, and adaptive communication protocols, enabling efficient, secure, and scalable swarm drone operations in dynamic and critical environments.

9. Real-World Deployment and Standardization Efforts

Moving from 5G to 6G represents a major evolution in wireless communication, integrating cutting-edge technologies, including IRS, THz communications, and UAVs. These innovations are set to deliver improved network capacity, extremely low latency, and smarter automation. However, the successful implementation in real-world scenarios hinges on comprehensive standardization efforts by global organizations such as 3GPP, ITU, ETSI, and IEEE, which are essential for ensuring smooth integration with current infrastructure and adherence to regulations. International standardization groups and societies play a critical role in shaping the future of 6G. This section highlights standardization roadmaps, commercial opportunities, and regulatory frameworks that will shape the adoption of 6G. Table 27 provides an overview of the standardization priorities of key organizations. The section mainly focuses on the efforts of ITU and ETSI.
The 3GPP’s Release 18, often viewed as the initial phase of 5G-Advanced, lays the groundwork for 6G by introducing AI-native networks, expanded UAV communication capabilities, and IRS-enhanced radio environments. Subsequent releases (19 and beyond) are expected to further refine these technologies. Table 28 provides the 3GPP standardization roadmap for 6G. The ITU is responsible for defining global policies and technical frameworks for wireless networks. The IMT-2030 framework highlights essential technology enablers for 6G, focusing on THz spectrum allocation (100 GHz–10 THz), UAV-assisted connectivity policies, and IRS as a smart radio environment enabler. Moreover, the IEEE is at the forefront of developing THz communications and integrating IRS. The IEEE 802.15.3d standard outlines the use of THz communication in wireless networks, while IRS applications are being investigated under the IEEE 802.11bf standard.

9.1. ITU Efforts

The ITU is essential in shaping global policies for wireless communication. As a specialized agency of the United Nations, the ITU establishes standards and regulatory frameworks that direct spectrum allocation, network interoperability, and the development of new technologies. For 6G networks, the ITU has introduced the IMT-2030 framework, which outlines the technical enablers and spectrum policies necessary for the next generation of wireless systems. This section delves into the ITU’s role, key policies, and the technology enablers of IMT-2030, focusing on THz spectrum allocation, UAV-assisted connectivity policies, and IRS as a smart radio environment (SRE) component.
The ITU regulates the IMT/2030 spectrum through the WRC. The WRC-23 and WRC-27 meetings are anticipated to finalize allocations for 6G, highlighting the THz spectrum for ultra-high-speed communication, LEO and NTN policies, and dynamic spectrum sharing between terrestrial and satellite networks [209]. The ITU works with the FCC, ETSI, and 3GPP to establish global THz spectrum allocation. The ITU identified THz communications as a key enabler for 6G/IMT2030 due to their ultra-wide bandwidth, which enables Tbps-level data rates and ultra-low latency. ITU study groups have identified the 100 GHz–10 THz range for 6G applications. This range will cover a wide range of applications, including holographic communications, high-resolution imaging, and quantum networking. Table 29 provides the ITU-announced key applications for the three main THz bands. Furthermore, common ITU-R recommendations for the THz spectrum are ITU-R M.2412/M.2516 and ITU-R SM.2352. ITU-R M.2412/M.2516 has been introduced to define the technical parameters for THz band deployment; however, ITU-R SM.2352 highlights spectrum sharing between THz and existing wireless technologies [207,209].
A. 
ITU-R M.2412/ M.2516
The ITU-R M.2412/ M.2516 recommendation outlines the technical specifications for utilizing the THz spectrum (100 GHz—10 THz) in future wireless communications, especially within 6G networks. This standard offers guidance on channel models, propagation characteristics, and system performance requirements to promote the effective use of THz frequencies. Implementing THz band communication is vital for achieving extremely high data rates (Tbps), very low latency (<1 ms), and enhanced spectral efficiency, making it a fundamental component for immersive applications, ITS, and smart environments. The ITU-R M.2412/ M.2516 recommendation aims to achieve the following [210,211].
  • Standardize the use of the THz spectrum for 6G and future technologies.
  • Define propagation models that consider the specific atmospheric absorption at THz frequencies.
  • Create channel models suitable for both indoor and outdoor settings.
  • Ensure that THz-based systems can work seamlessly with current wireless networks.
  • Refine link budget calculations to enhance coverage and reliability.
ITU-R M.2412 defines propagation models for the THz spectrum using three main models: the LOS dominant model, NLOS model, and hybrid model for dynamic environments. THz waves suffer from significant attenuation due to molecular absorption, particularly water vapor and oxygen molecules. The report identified the atmospheric absorption peaks for THz bands. To mitigate this, ITU-R M.2412 suggested using frequency windows with minimal absorption, such as 275–320 GHz and 400–700 GHz, for optimal performance. ITU-R M.2412 also outlines deployment guidelines for maximizing THz communication efficiency. For reliable THz communication, link budget calculations must consider the following [210].
P R x = P T x + G T x + G R x F S P L γ a t m γ o t h e r
where PRx is the received power, PTx is the transmitted power, GTx is the gain of the transmitting antenna, GRx is the gain of the receiving antenna, γatm is the atmospheric absorption attenuation, and γother is the other losses, e.g., penetration losses, scattering, and hardware impairments. Given the high path loss, ITU-R M.2412 recommended using the following solutions for THz communications.
  • Ultra-directional antennas (e.g., plasmonic antennas, leaky-wave antennas) for beamforming.
  • Massive MIMO techniques to improve gain and efficiency.
  • IRS to enhance signal propagation through passive beamforming.
ITU-R M.2412/ M.2516 defines four optimal deployment scenarios for THz networks. Table 30 introduces these four deployment scenarios and the main applications associated with each deployment scenario. Despite ITU-R M.2412/ M.2516’s efforts to standardize THz deployment, several challenges remain. This includes the following.
  • The challenges associated with the efficient THz transceiver design. This includes efficient THz power amplifiers, oscillators, and graphene-based antennas are needed.
  • THz circuits suffer from high power consumption and thermal instability.
  • Security challenges associated with THz networks. Novel encryption techniques are required due to short-range eavesdropping risks.
  • THz spectrum allocation and optimization remain challenges. AI/ML can be used to dynamically optimize spectrum usage in real-time.
B. 
ITU-R SM.2352
ITU-R SM.2352 offers important spectrum-sharing guidelines between THz-band and current wireless technologies, aiming for efficient coexistence without interference. As 6G networks incorporate THz communication for ultra-high-speed data transfer, it is vital to tackle potential conflicts with existing spectrum users, such as satellites, radar systems, and mmWave networks. The THz spectrum overlaps with various existing communication technologies, raising potential concerns about interference. Table 31 provides the potential spectrum-sharing challenges in different frequency ranges. This recommendation outlines regulatory frameworks, interference mitigation techniques, and dynamic spectrum access strategies to facilitate the smooth deployment of THz communication alongside current services. The main objectives of the ITU-R SM.2352 recommendation are as follows [212].
  • Establishing mechanisms for spectrum sharing between THz and existing wireless technologies.
  • Developing techniques for managing interference to safeguard essential services like satellite communications, radar systems, and backhaul links.
  • Enhancing spectrum utilization through dynamic spectrum access (DSA) and CR methods.
  • Ensuring regulatory compliance for THz networks operating with 5G, Wi-Fi 7, and satellite networks.
THz signals overlapping with mmWave frequencies (30–100 GHz) may face spillover effects, disrupting satellite and radar operations. Another issue is that high-frequency signals are prone to strong reflections, resulting in interference in indoor settings and densely populated urban areas. Also, THz communication depends on highly directional beams, which can unintentionally interfere with nearby receivers.
To overcome such challenges and enable effective coexistence of THz networks with existing wireless systems, ITU-R SM.2352 outlines several spectrum-sharing mechanisms that include the following.
(1)
DSA and CR
CRN facilitates intelligent spectrum sensing to identify and avoid interference with current wireless services. Spectrum sensing techniques include energy detection, matched filtering, and cyclostationary feature detection approaches. Energy detection is used to detect occupied spectrum bands; however, matched filtering is deployed to ensure precise detection of licensed signals. Furthermore, cyclostationary feature detection can distinguish THz signals from noise and interference. Moreover, opportunistic spectrum sharing can permit THz transmitters to dynamically utilize the underused spectrum, alleviating congestion.
(2)
Interference mitigation techniques
Power control algorithms can dynamically adjust transmission power to minimize interference with neighboring bands. This is mainly considered for minimizing cross-band interference. However, beamforming can enhance signal directionality. Adaptive beamforming employs AI-driven smart antennas to direct THz beams away from sensitive receivers. Furthermore, guard band allocation is another approach that establishes buffer frequency ranges between THz and legacy systems to lessen spectral leakage and thus mitigate adjacent channel interference.
(3)
Spectrum reallocation strategies
ITU-R SM.2352 suggests reallocating parts of the THz band for specific applications while minimizing the impact on existing systems.
ITU-R SM.2352 recommends several regulatory and technical strategies to facilitate effective THz spectrum sharing. Also, it details deployment strategies to balance THz network performance with the coexistence of existing services. While ITU-R SM.2352 has made strides in outlining spectrum-sharing guidelines, additional research is necessary for developing AI-driven spectrum allocation, achieving enhanced secure spectrum access, improving energy-efficient THz communication, and integrating QC with THz networks
ITU identified three main scenarios for UAV-assisted connectivity: an aerial base station (ABS), relays for backhaul connectivity, and LEO-satellite interworking. UAVs can act as flying base stations for emergency and rural connectivity. This scenario can also be used for supporting dense deployment in 6G networks. The second scenario uses UAVs to connect remote IoT devices with terrestrial networks. In the third scenario, UAVs act as intermediaries between ground users and LEO satellite constellations.

9.2. ETSI Efforts

The ETSI is dedicated to advancing network intelligence and edge computing. Its projects aim to facilitate the real-world implementation of 6G technologies, which include IRS and connectivity through UAVs. ETSI launched the following three main working groups for 6G technologies.
  • ETSI ENI ISG: AI-driven network automation.
  • ETSI ZSM: Zero-touch network management.
  • ETSI RRS: Reconfigurable radio systems for IRS-based networks.
(a) 
ENI ISG
The ENI ISG is leading the way in transforming network management by integrating AI. By developing a cognitive network management architecture, it seeks to improve network operations by adapting services in real-time to meet changing user needs, environmental factors, and business objectives. The main aim of ENI ISG is to revolutionize network management through the use of AI-driven, context-aware policies. This strategy allows for automated service provisioning, efficient operations, and strong assurance across various network types. The key objectives of this ESTI group are as follows [213].
  • Using AI to automate service provisioning, operations, and assurance, which reduces the need for manual interventions and lowers operational costs.
  • Applying AI techniques for dynamic slice management and resource orchestration to boost network efficiency.
  • Implementing context-aware policies to modify services based on real-time shifts in user requirements, environmental conditions, and business goals.
ENI ISG is dedicated to enhancing the operator experience by utilizing closed-loop AI mechanisms based on context-aware, metadata-driven policies. This allows the ENI system to identify and integrate new and evolving knowledge, resulting in actionable decisions. The model offers recommendations to decision-making systems, such as network control, and interacts with management systems to adjust services and resources in response to changes in user needs, environmental conditions, and business objectives. The key activities of the group include the following [213].
  • Implementing AI-based control loops that continuously monitor network performance and make real-time adjustments to optimize operations.
  • Developing policies that take into account user context, environmental factors, and business objectives to guide network behavior.
  • Ensuring the ENI system recognizes and incorporates new and updated knowledge, facilitating adaptive and intelligent decision-making.
  • Offering actionable recommendations to network control and management systems to adjust services and resources in response to changing conditions.
The ENI ISG has released the first version of the system architecture with context-aware policy management, covering various aspects such as categorization on networks using AI, intent-aware network architecture, data mechanisms, evaluation of categorization, functional concepts, prominent control loop architectures, and AI mechanisms. Additionally, two versions of the PoC framework and three versions of the use cases, requirements, and terminology in Release 2 have been published. A second version of system architecture was recently released. ENI ISG has initiated PoCs to demonstrate how AI techniques can enhance network operations. These PoCs are designed to validate the practical use of ENI’s frameworks and gather insights for future standardization efforts [213]. The PoC framework, as outlined in ETSI GS ENI 006, specifies the objectives, scope, and evaluation criteria for PoCs. It acts as a guideline for industry stakeholders to create and evaluate AI-driven network management solutions. Several PoCs are currently in progress, each focusing on different aspects of AI integration into network management. The ENI Wiki has more information about ongoing PoCs.
The ENI system architecture features two control loops that utilize AI modeling. Data collected are transmitted through an optional API, normalized, and processed within various AI analysis functional blocks, which can be recursive and interactive through an inner loop. The actionable decisions are then de-normalized and sent back to the network via the same optional API in reverse. This architecture uses control-loop AI/ML mechanisms to enhance operator experiences by relying on context-aware and metadata-driven policies. This approach enables effective network management by adjusting services and resources according to user needs and environmental factors. Data collected from the network are normalized and processed through AI analysis functional blocks. These blocks can function recursively and interactively, creating an inner loop that sharpens decision-making processes. The resulting actionable decisions are then de-normalized and relayed to the network for execution.
(b) 
ZSM
Traditional management methods are becoming less effective in dealing with current and upcoming networks’ complexity, scale, and dynamic nature. In response to this challenge, the ETSI formed the ZSM ISG in December 2017. The main goal of the ZSM ISG is to create comprehensive end-to-end architecture and solutions for automated network and service management, aiming to minimize or completely eliminate the need for human intervention. The ZSM ISG focuses on several key challenges in modern network management that include the following [214].
  • As networks transition to programmable, software-driven, and service-oriented architectures, their complexity grows. ZSM aims to tackle this complexity through automation, ensuring efficient operation and maintenance.
  • Networks must exhibit exceptional operational agility to take advantage of new business opportunities through technological advancements like network slicing. ZSM seeks to enable this by allowing quick adjustments to evolving service requirements.
  • The ultimate aim is to achieve complete end-to-end network and service management automation. This encompasses automated delivery, deployment, configuration, assurance, and optimization processes.
  • ZSM envisions networks that can self-configure, self-monitor, self-heal, and self-optimize, guided by high-level policies and rules, thus reducing the need for human involvement.
The ZSM reference architecture aims to achieve automation and autonomy goals. It consists of several management domains (MDs), each tasked with overseeing a specific infrastructure segment, along with an end-to-end service management domain (E2E SMD) that coordinates the management services offered by individual MDs for comprehensive cross-domain management. Each management domain, including the E2E SMD, provides a range of management services delivered by the management functions within that domain. MDs are responsible for managing particular segments of the network or service infrastructure. Each MD functions independently while collaborating with other MDs to ensure unified management throughout the network. The E2E SMD orchestrates and manages services that extend across multiple MDs, guaranteeing smooth service delivery and performance across the entire network. Both MDs and the E2E SMD offer management services that enable interactions among various management functions. These services are designed for interoperability, promoting flexible and dynamic management processes [214].
The ZSM framework outlines a collection of management services organized according to their functionalities, which promote automation and interoperability throughout the network. Table 32 provides a description of the main service categories.
Security is a vital component of the ZSM framework. The ETSI GS ZSM 014 specification outlines the security reference architecture for ZSM, detailing a range of security capabilities as management services. These capabilities encompass adaptive trust relationships between management domains, dynamic access control, the resilience of AI/ML models, and the automatic enforcement of security policies. To validate and demonstrate the practical use of the ZSM framework, the ISG ZSM promotes the creation of PoCs. These PoCs are designed to illustrate the feasibility of ZSM implementations in real-world situations, offering valuable insights and lessons that can guide ongoing specification efforts.
For example, the ServoCloud project was initiated as the first PoC, concentrating on developing a reference architecture for dynamic services and a novel method for automating operations, beginning with 5G network slicing. The ISG ZSM also works closely with relevant standardization organizations, open-source initiatives, and forums to encourage the adoption and alignment of the ZSM architecture and its solutions. This collaborative strategy is essential for achieving automated end-to-end network and service management across the industry, promoting interoperability and innovation.
(c) 
RRS
RRS represents cutting-edge wireless communication technologies that utilize SDR and CR to adapt to real-time changing conditions. This flexibility improves spectrum efficiency, enhances network performance, and facilitates the easy integration of new services. SDR enables radio devices to change their operating parameters, e.g., frequency range, modulation type, and output power, through software updates, which means no hardware changes are necessary [217]. CR allows radio systems to monitor their environment, learn from it, and adjust their parameters and protocols accordingly. This results in better spectrum utilization and enhanced service quality. RRS can take advantage of underutilized frequency bands by adapting to real-time spectrum availability, helping to tackle the issue of limited spectrum resources. Its adaptable design makes it easy to integrate new services and standards without requiring hardware changes. Furthermore, by enabling multiple functions and standards on a single reconfigurable device, RRS reduces the need for various hardware platforms.
ETSI formed the technical committee on RRS (TC RRS) to create standards for various aspects of RRS, including the architecture of reconfigurable equipment and cognitive radio systems. TC RRS focuses on the following main topics [217,218].
  • Proposing standards that allow radios to detect and adapt to their surroundings for enhanced performance.
  • Developing frameworks that facilitate the shared use of licensed spectrum bands, thereby improving spectrum efficiency.
  • Outlining architectures and interfaces that enable the dynamic reconfiguration of radio equipment.
  • Setting up certification processes and security protocols to guarantee the reliable and secure functioning of reconfigurable radio systems.
ETSI’s TC RRS has created a range of standards to support software reconfiguration for commercial uses. These standards tackle issues such as spectrum sharing, coexistence among various cognitive radio networks, and the management and control of reconfigurable radio systems. An example is the TS 103 681-3 V1.1.1, which defines protocols for the unified radio application interface, facilitating interoperability among reconfigurable radio devices [218].

10. Conclusions

The emergence of 6G wireless networks offers a once-in-a-generation chance to rethink global connectivity based on intelligent, high-speed, and ultra-reliable communication systems. This review investigated three disruptive technologies: UAV-based communication, THz communication, and IRS technology. These technologies are expected to shape the development of future-generation wireless networks. Each of these enablers contributes unique advantages: UAVs provide flexible and adaptive communication solutions in remote or dynamic environments, THz communication overcomes bandwidth limitations to support ultra-high data rates, and IRS technology enhances spectral and energy efficiency by dynamically reconfiguring signal propagation. Although they hold great promise, there are still some technical issues that need to be addressed, such as energy efficiency, security, seamless integration, and real-time network flexibility. Efforts to overcome these challenges require interdisciplinary collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers to create new solutions that increase the effectiveness and extensibility of 6G networks. This work provided deep insights into the challenges and key solutions of deploying these three technologies for different 6G applications. Open research questions were also introduced. Future research should address (a) the development of intelligent resource allocation algorithms, (b) hardware feasibility, and (c) a standardized framework for the integration of these technologies in the context of the overall 6G ecosystem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; methodology, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; formal analysis, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; investigation, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; resources, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., A.K., and A.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; writing—review and editing, W.M.O., A.A.A., M.E.N., A.M., M.E., A.K., and A.A.H.; supervision, M.E.N.; project administration, A.A.A.; funding acquisition, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Prince Sultan University. Also, the studies at St. Petersburg State University of Telecommunications “M.A. Bonch-Bruevich” were supported by the Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation under grant 075-15-2022-1137.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Prince Sultan University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, C.-X.; You, X.; Gao, X.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Haas, H.; et al. On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Testbeds. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Secondquarter. 2023, 25, 905–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, W.; Montojo, J.; Lee, J.; Shafi, M.; Kim, Y. The Standardization of 5G-Advanced in 3GPP. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2022, 60, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Z.; Du, Y.; Wei, K.; Han, K.; Xu, X.; Wei, G.; Tong, W.; Zhu, P.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Vision, Application Scenarios, and Key Technology Trends for 6G Mobile Communications. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2022, 65, 151301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Lin, X.; Lee, J.; Toskala, A.; Sun, S.; Chiasserini, C.F.; Liu, L. 5G-Advanced toward 6G: Past, Present, and Future. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2023, 41, 1592–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaushik, A.; Singh, R.; Dayarathna, S.; Senanayake, R.; Di Renzo, M.; Dajer, M.; Ji, H.; Kim, Y.; Sciancalepore, V.; Zappone, A.; et al. Toward Integrated Sensing and Communications for 6G: Key Enabling Technologies, Standardization, and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2024, 8, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. IMT Traffic Estimates for the Years 2020 to 2030. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Available online: https://www.itu.int/pub/r-rep-m.2370 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  7. Pennanen, H.; Hänninen, T.; Tervo, O.; Tölli, A.; Latva-Aho, M. 6G: The Intelligent Network of Everything. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 1319–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, X.; Mei, J.; Cui, S.; Wang, C.-X.; Shen, X.S. Realizing 6G: The Operational Goals, Enabling Technologies of Future Networks, and Value-Oriented Intelligent Multi-Dimensional Multiple Access. IEEE Netw. January/Febr. 2023, 37, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brik, B.; Chergui, H.; Zanzi, L.; Devoti, F.; Ksentini, A.; Siddiqui, M.S.; Costa-Pèrez, X.; Verikoukis, C. Explainable AI in 6G O-RAN: A Tutorial and Survey on Architecture, Use Cases, Challenges, and Future Research. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamid, H.; Begh, G.R. IRS Assisted UAV Communications for 6G Networks: A Systematic Literature Review. Wirel. Netw. 2025, 31, 779–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, W.; Zhou, Q.; He, J.; Habibi, M.A.; Melnyk, S.; El-Absi, M.; Han, B.; Renzo, M.D.; Schotten, H.D.; Luo, F.-L.; et al. Terahertz Communications and Sensing for 6G and beyond: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Fourthquarter. 2024, 26, 2326–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Farouk, A.; Abuali, N.A.; Mumtaz, S. Quantum-Computing-Based Channel and Signal Modeling for 6G Wireless Systems. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2024, 62, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sidharth, T.; Virdi, J.S.; Aydin, B.; Ian, P.R. A Survey on Advancements in THz Technology for 6G: Systems, Circuits, Antennas, and Experiments. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.01957. [Google Scholar]
  14. Casetti, C. Mobile Milestones: Speed Breakthroughs and Network Tweaks [Mobile Radio]. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2023, 18, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qadir, Z.; Le, K.N.; Saeed, N.; Munawar, H.S. Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Use Cases, and Open Challenges. ICT Express 2023, 9, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aslam, A.M.; Chaudhary, R.; Bhardwaj, A.; Budhiraja, I.; Kumar, N.; Zeadally, S. Metaverse for 6G and beyond: The next Revolution and Deployment Challenges. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2023, 6, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wallace, J.; Valdivia, A. A High-Performance 5G/6G Infrastructure for Augmented, Virtual, and Extended Reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15–17 December 2021; pp. 1291–1296. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zawish, M.; Dharejo, F.A.; Khowaja, S.A.; Raza, S.; Davy, S.; Dev, K.; Bellavista, P. AI and 6G into the Metaverse: Fundamentals, Challenges and Future Research Trends. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 730–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, H.; Shokrnezhad, M.; Taleb, T.; Li, R.; Song, J. Toward 6G-Based Metaverse: Supporting Highly-Dynamic Deterministic Multi-User Extended Reality Services. IEEE Netw. 2023, 37, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ateya, A.A.; Muthanna, A.; Koucheryavy, A.; Maleh, Y.; El-Latif, A.A.A. Energy Efficient Offloading Scheme for MEC-Based Augmented Reality System. Cluster Comput. 2023, 26, 789–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shvetsov, A.V.; Hamood Alsamhi, S. When Holographic Communication Meets Metaverse: Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 197488–197515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saraswat, D.; Bhattacharya, P.; Verma, A.; Prasad, V.K.; Tanwar, S.; Sharma, G.; Bokoro, P.N.; Sharma, R. Explainable AI for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 84486–84517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahad, A.; Jiangbina, Z.; Tahir, M.; Shayea, I.; Sheikh, M.A.; Rasheed, F. 6G and Intelligent Healthcare: Taxonomy, Technologies, Open Issues and Future Research Directions. Internet Things 2024, 25, 101068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hazra, A.; Munusamy, A.; Adhikari, M.; Awasthi, L.K. Venu 6G-Enabled Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communication for Industry 5.0: Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2024, 8, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tiago, M.F.-C.; Paula, F.-L. Forging the Industrial Metaverse—Where Industry 5.0, Augmented and Mixed Reality, IIoT, Opportunistic Edge Computing and Digital Twins Meet. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.11312. [Google Scholar]
  26. Araniti, G.; Iera, A.; Pizzi, S.; Rinaldi, F. Toward 6G Non-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Netw. January/Febr. 2022, 36, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yaklaf, S.K.A.A.; Tarmissi, K.S.; Shashoa, N.A.A. 6G Mobile Communications Systems: Requirements, Specifications, Challenges, Applications, and Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 1st International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering MI-STA, Tripoli, Libya, 25–27 May 2021; pp. 679–683. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sofiane, L.; Hocine, B.; Abdelmalik, T.-A. Some Applications Envisaged for the New Generation of Communications Networks 6G. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.14117. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aneesh, S.; Shaikh, A.N. A Survey for 6G Network: Requirements, Technologies and Research Areas. In Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA), Namakkal, India, 19–21 July 2023; pp. 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guo, F.; Yu, F.R.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Ji, H.; Leung, V.C.M. Enabling Massive IoT toward 6G: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 11891–11915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Petkova, R.; Bozhilov, I.; Manolova, A.; Tonchev, K.; Poulkov, V. On the Way to Holographic-Type Communications: Perspectives and Enabling Technologies. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 59236–59259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lou, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, R.; Lv, C. A Human-Cyber-Physical System Enabled Sequential Disassembly Planning Approach for a Human-Robot Collaboration Cell in Industry 5.0. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2024, 87, 102706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalor, A.E.; Durisi, G.; Coleri, S.; Parkvall, S.; Yu, W.; Mueller, A.; Popovski, P. Wireless 6G Connectivity for Massive Number of Devices and Critical Services. Proc. IEEE 2024, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast 2027. Available online: https://ipcisco.com/global-mobile-data-traffic-forecast-2027/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  35. Mahboob, S.; Liu, L. Revolutionizing Future Connectivity: A Contemporary Survey on AI-Empowered Satellite-Based Non-Terrestrial Networks in 6G. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Secondquarter. 2024, 26, 1279–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, Y.; Ye, Z.; Wu, M.; Li, H.; Xiao, M.; Alouini, M.-S.; Al-Hourani, A.; Cioni, S. Space-Air-Ground Integrated Wireless Networks for 6G: Basics, Key Technologies, and Future Trends. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2024, 42, 3327–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Onel, L.; Singh, R.K.; Dinh-Thuy, P.-H.; Efstathios, K.; Nafiseh, M.; Riku, J.; Hamza, K.; Osmel, R.; Pavlos, A.; Prasoon, R.; et al. Zero-Energy Devices for 6G: Technical Enablers at a Glance. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.09244. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, Z.; Liang, Q. Massive MIMO Channel Modeling Based on B5G/6G and Consumer IoT. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ullah, M.S.; Ashraf, Z.B.; Sarker, S.C. Performance Analysis of 6G Multiuser Massive MIMO-OFDM THz Wireless Systems with Hybrid Beamforming under Intercarrier Interference. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.12351. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, N.; Fan, P. Centralized versus Distributed Operation in Cell-Free Massive MIMO with Hardware Impairments and Prior Information. IEEE Syst. J. 2024, 18, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duan, Y.; Wu, T.; Chen, Z.; Tao, M. DM-MIMO: Diffusion Models for Robust Semantic Communications over MIMO Channels. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), Hangzhou, China, 7–9 August 2024; pp. 1609–1614. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Z. Big AI Models for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Directions. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, P.; Xing, Y. Always-on Personal AI for 6G Networks. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), Toronto, ON, Canada, 19–21 June 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ye, N.; Miao, S.; Pan, J.; Ouyang, Q.; Li, X.; Hou, X. Artificial Intelligence for Wireless Physical-Layer Technologies (AI4PHY): A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2024, 10, 729–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, R.; Li, A.; Si, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, T.; Xu, T. A Survey on Brain-Computer Interface-Inspired Communications: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 27, 108–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chi, X.; Qin, X.; Xu, X.; Han, S.; Jin, L.; Zhang, P. Age of Model: A Metric for Keeping AI Models up-to-Date in Edge Intelligence-Enabled IoV. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 13047–13059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Das, S.K.; Mudi, R.; Rahman, M.S.; Rabie, K.M.; Li, X. Federated Reinforcement Learning for Wireless Networks: Fundamentals, Challenges and Future Research Trends. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2024, 5, 1400–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Butt, M.O.; Waheed, N.; Duong, T.Q.; Ejaz, W. Quantum-Inspired Resource Optimization for 6G Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ateya, A.A.; Mahmoud, M.; Zaghloul, A.; Soliman, N.F.; Muthanna, A. Empowering the Internet of Things Using Light Communication and Distributed Edge Computing. Electronics 2022, 11, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, X. VLC Standards. In Synthesis Lectures on Communications; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 93–107. ISBN 9783031644740. [Google Scholar]
  51. Aly, B.; Elamassie, M.; Uysal, M. Vehicular VLC System with Selection Combining. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 12350–12355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, P.; Yin, Y.; Tong, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Q.; Chen, M. Channel Characterization and Modeling for VLC-IoE Applications in 6G: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 34872–34895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Farias da Costa, V.C.; Oliveira, L.; de Souza, J. Internet of Everything (IoE) Taxonomies: A Survey and a Novel Knowledge-Based Taxonomy. Sensors 2021, 21, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Ahmad, K.; Al-Fuqaha, A.; Qadir, J. Advancing Education Through Extended Reality and Internet of Everything Enabled Metaverses: Applications, Challenges, and Open Issues. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2024, 17, 1120–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jamil, B.; Ijaz, H.; Shojafar, M.; Munir, K.; Buyya, R. Resource Allocation and Task Scheduling in Fog Computing and Internet of Everything Environments: A Taxonomy, Review, and Future Directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 2022, 54, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zuo, Y.; Guo, J.; Gao, N.; Zhu, Y.; Jin, S.; Li, X. A Survey of Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence for 6G Wireless Communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Fourthquarter. 2023, 25, 2494–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jahid, A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Hall, T.J. The Convergence of Blockchain, IoT and 6G: Potential, Opportunities, Challenges and Research Roadmap. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2023, 217, 103677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ullah, I.; Deng, X.; Pei, X.; Jiang, P.; Mushtaq, H. A Verifiable and Privacy-Preserving Blockchain-Based Federated Learning Approach. Peer Peer Netw. Appl. 2023, 16, 2256–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Al-Matari, N.Y.; Zahary, A.T.; A. Al-Shargabi, A. A Survey on Advancements in Blockchain-Enabled Spectrum Access Security for 6G Cognitive Radio IoT Networks. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 30990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pan, C.; Ren, H.; Wang, K.; Kolb, J.F.; Elkashlan, M.; Chen, M.; Di Renzo, M.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Swindlehurst, A.L.; et al. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G Systems: Principles, Applications, and Research Directions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2021, 59, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sabogu-Sumah, R.; Opare, K.A.-B.; Gadze, J.D.; Fianko, E.Y.; Ashong, T. Reconfigurable Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces Enabled Spectrum Access for beyond 5G Networks. In Proceedings of the 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS), Manama, Bahrain, 28–29 January 2024; pp. 1278–1282. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Chu, X.; Song, S.; Deng, Y.; Nallanathan, A.; Karagiannidis, G.K. Open-Source Edge AI for 6G Wireless Networks. IEEE Netw. 2025, 39, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhong, R.; Mu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jaber, M.; Liu, Y. Mobile Edge Generation: A New Era to 6G. IEEE Netw. 2024, 38, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tao, Z.; Xu, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; You, X. Wireless Network Digital Twin for 6G: Generative AI as a Key Enabler. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sheraz, M.; Chuah, T.C.; Lee, Y.L.; Alam, M.M.; Al-Habashna, A.; Han, Z. A Comprehensive Survey on Revolutionizing Connectivity through Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Digital Twin Network in 6G. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 49184–49215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zheng, J.; Luan, T.H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G.; Su, Z.; Wu, W. Digital Twin in 6G: Embracing Comprehensive Network Intelligence. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, W.; Fu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Wang, H. When Digital Twin Meets 6G: Concepts, Obstacles, and Research Prospects. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2024, 63, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Teng, L.; Sun, W.; Li, C.; Min, X.; Zhang, X.-P.; Zhai, G. Quality-of-Experience Evaluation for Digital Twins in 6G Network Environments. IEEE Trans. On Broadcast. 2024, 70, 995–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Hamid Aghvami, A. Goal-Oriented Semantic Communications for Avatar-Centric Augmented Reality. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2024, 72, 7982–7995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mineeva, V.; Zhitov, A.; Artem, V.; Muthanna, A.; Koucheryavy, A. A Digital Avatar System for Telepresence Services in 6G Toward HolNetVerse. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing Workshops (CCGridW), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 6–9 May 2024; pp. 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  71. Luo, R.; Wang, C.; Schwarm, E.; Keil, C.; Mendoza, E.; Kaveti, P.; Alt, S.; Singh, H.; Padir, T.; Whitney, J.P. Towards Robot Avatars: Systems and Methods for Teleinteraction at Avatar XPRIZE Semi-Finals. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Kyoto, Japan, 23–27 October 2022; pp. 7726–7733. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zambella, G.; Grioli, G.; Cavaliere, A.; Rosato, G.; Petrocelli, C.; Poggiani, M.; Barbarossa, M.; Lentini, G.; Sessa, E.; Tincani, V.; et al. Usability of a Robot Avatar Designed for the Real World: The Alter-Ego X Case Study. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, P.; Xi, S.; Guo, W.; Shen, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Kang, J.; Niyato, D.; Qiao, X.; et al. 6G-Enabled Edge AI for Metaverse: Challenges, Methods, and Future Research Directions. J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 2022, 7, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gokce Narin, N. The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Solution Technologies in Metaverse Design. In Studies in Big Data; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 45–63. ISBN 9789819946402. [Google Scholar]
  75. Maksymyuk, T.; Gazda, J.; Shubyn, B.; Karpin, O.; Kapshii, O.; Urikova, O.; Amhoud, E.-M.; Liyanage, M.; Jo, M.; Dohler, M. Metaverse of Things in 6G Era: An Emerging Fusion of IoT, XR, Edge AI and Blockchain Technologies. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 546–564. ISBN 9783031249624. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rafique, W.; Qadir, J. Internet of Everything Meets the Metaverse: Bridging Physical and Virtual Worlds with Blockchain. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2024, 54, 100678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Coronado, E.; Behravesh, R.; Subramanya, T.; Fernandez-Fernandez, A.; Siddiqui, M.S.; Costa-Perez, X.; Riggio, R. Zero Touch Management: A Survey of Network Automation Solutions for 5G and 6G Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Fourthquarter. 2022, 24, 2535–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. El Rajab, M.; Yang, L.; Shami, A. Zero-Touch Networks: Towards next-Generation Network Automation. Comput. Netw. 2024, 243, 110294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abbas, W.B.; Ahmed, Q.Z.; Khan, F.A.; Mian, N.S.; Lazaridis, P.I.; Sureephong, P. Designing Future Wireless Networks (FWN)s with Net Zero (NZ) and Zero Touch (ZT) Perspective. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 83301–83321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rani, S.; Babbar, H.; Krichen, M.; Yu, K.; Memon, F.H. Network Slicing for Zero-Touch Networks: A Top-Notch Technology. IEEE Netw. 2023, 37, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mahmood, M.R.; Matin, M.A.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Goudos, S.K. A Comprehensive Review on Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Algorithms for Empowering the Future IoT toward 6G Era. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 87535–87562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Muttair, K.S.; Aljawaheri, K.K.; Ali, M.Z.; Shareef, O.A.; Mosleh, M.F. New Ultra-Small Design and High Performance of an 8× 8 Massive MIMO Antenna for Future 6G Wireless Devices. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2022, 28, 587–599. [Google Scholar]
  83. Alhaj, N.A.; Jamlos, M.F.; Manap, S.A.; Abdelsalam, S.; Bakhit, A.A.; Mamat, R.; Jamlos, M.A.; Gismalla, M.S.M.; Hamdan, M. Integration of Hybrid Networks, AI, Ultra Massive-MIMO, THz Frequency, and FBMC Modulation toward 6G Requirements: A Review. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 483–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qamar, F.; Kazmi, S.H.A.; Ariffin, K.A.Z.; Tayyab, M.; Nguyen, Q.N. Multi-Antenna Arrays Based Massive-MIMO for B5G/6G: State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Future Research Directions. Information 2024, 15, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Devnikar, R.; Hendre, V. Comprehensive Literature Survey for Mm-Wave Massive MIMO Using Machine Learning for 6G. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 765–774. ISBN 9789811679841. [Google Scholar]
  86. Lu, H.; Zeng, Y.; You, C.; Han, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Jin, S.; Wang, C.-X.; Jiang, T.; et al. A Tutorial on Near-Field XL-MIMO Communications toward 6G. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. Fourthquarter. 2024, 26, 2213–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pereira de Figueiredo, F.A. An Overview of Massive MIMO for 5G and 6G. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 2022, 20, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. You, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Ma, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhan, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. Toward 6G $\textTK\mu$ Extreme Connectivity: Architecture, Key Technologies and Experiments. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2023, 30, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chataut, R.; Akl, R. Massive MIMO Systems for 5G and beyond Networks-Overview, Recent Trends, Challenges, and Future Research Direction. Sensors 2020, 20, 2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Suyama, S.; Okuyama, T.; Nonaka, N.; Asai, T. Recent Studies on Massive MIMO Technologies for 5G Evolution and 6G. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 16–19 January 2022; pp. 90–93. [Google Scholar]
  91. Huang, C.; Hu, S.; Alexandropoulos, G.C.; Zappone, A.; Yuen, C.; Zhang, R.; Renzo, M.D.; Debbah, M. Holographic MIMO Surfaces for 6G Wireless Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and Trends. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mathew, A. Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Computing for 6G Communications & Networks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 2021, 10, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sharrab, Y.O.; Almutiri, N.T.; Tarawneh, M.; Alzyoud, F.; Al-Ghuwairi, A.R.; Al-Fraihat, D. Toward Smart and Immersive Classroom Based on AI, VR, and 6G. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn 2023, 18, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, C.; Guo, W.; Sun, S.C.; Al-Rubaye, S.; Tsourdos, A. Trustworthy Deep Learning in 6G-Enabled Mass Autonomy: From Concept to Quality-of-Trust Key Performance Indicators. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2020, 15, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Guo, W. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for 6G: Improving Trust between Human and Machine. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, S.; Xiang, C.; Xu, S. 6G: Connecting Everything by 1000 Times Price Reduction. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2020, 1, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bodkhe, U.; Verma, A.; Saraswat, D.; Bhattacharya, P.; Tanwar, S. Adoption of Blockchain for Data Privacy in 6G-Envisioned Augmented Reality: Opportunities and Challenges. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 519–532. ISBN 9789811902833. [Google Scholar]
  98. Bhattacharya, P.; Saraswat, D.; Dave, A.; Acharya, M.; Tanwar, S.; Sharma, G.; Davidson, I.E. Coalition of 6G and Blockchain in AR/VR Space: Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 168455–168484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Katz, M.; Ahmed, I. Opportunities and Challenges for Visible Light Communications in 6G. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd 6G Wireless Summit (6G SUMMIT), Levi, Finland, 17–20 March 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  100. Gupta, A.; Fernando, X. Exploring Secure Visible Light Communication in Next-Generation (6G) Internet-of-Things. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Harbin City, China, 28 June–2 July 2021; pp. 2090–2097. [Google Scholar]
  101. Soderi, S.; Brighente, A.; Turrin, F.; Conti, M. VLC Physical Layer Security through RIS-Aided Jamming Receiver for 6G Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of the 2022 19th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), Stockholm, Sweden, 20–23 September 2022; pp. 370–378. [Google Scholar]
  102. Naser, S.; Bariah, L.; Muhaidat, S.; Sofotasios, P.C.; Al-Qutayri, M.; Damiani, E.; Debbah, M. Toward Federated-Learning-Enabled Visible Light Communication in 6G Systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Calandra, D.; Pratticò, F.G.; Cannavò, A.; Casetti, C.; Lamberti, F. Digital Twin- and Extended Reality-Based Telepresence for Collaborative Robot Programming in the 6G Perspective. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2024, 10, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Meng, Z.; She, C.; Zhao, G.; Imran, M.A.; Dohler, M.; Li, Y.; Vucetic, B. Task-Oriented Metaverse Design in the 6G Era. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Galli, A.; Giardina, P.G.; Guta, M.; Lossi, L.; Mancina, A.; Moscato, V.; Patrone, F.; Roseti, C.; Romano, S.P.; Sperlí, G.; et al. AI for Zero-Touch Management of Satellite Networks in B5G and 6G Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the AI6G’22: First International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in beyond 5G and 6G Wireless Networks, Padua, Italy, 21 July 2022. [Google Scholar]
  106. Liyanage, M.; Pham, Q.-V.; Dev, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Yenduri, G. A Survey on Zero Touch Network and Service Management (ZSM) for 5G and beyond Networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 203, 103362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bhattacharya, P.; Mukherjee, A.; Tanwar, S.; Pricop, E. Zero-Load: A Zero Touch Network Based Router Management Scheme Underlying 6G-IoT Ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Bucharest, Romania, 29–30 June 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  108. Abou El Houda, Z.; Brik, B.; Ksentini, A. Securing IIoT Applications in 6G and beyond Using Adaptive Ensemble Learning and Zero-Touch Multi-Resource Provisioning. Comput. Commun. 2024, 216, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, J.; Ling, X.; Le, Y.; Huang, Y.; You, X. Blockchain-Enabled Wireless Communications: A New Paradigm towards 6G. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8, nwab069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Xu, H.; Klaine, P.V.; Onireti, O.; Cao, B.; Imran, M.; Zhang, L. Blockchain-Enabled Resource Management and Sharing for 6G Communications. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2020, 6, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sharma, T.; Prasad, S.K.; Sharma, V. Research Challenges of Blockchain in 6G Network. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Delhi Section Conference (DELCON), New Delhi, India, 11–13 February 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  112. Kalla, A.; de Alwis, C.; Porambage, P.; Gür, G.; Liyanage, M. A Survey on the Use of Blockchain for Future 6G: Technical Aspects, Use Cases, Challenges and Research Directions. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 30, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pajooh, H.H.; Demidenko, S.; Aslam, S.; Harris, M. Blockchain and 6G-Enabled IoT. Inventions 2022, 7, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, W.; Su, Z.; Li, R.; Zhang, K.; Wang, Y. Blockchain-Based Data Security for Artificial Intelligence Applications in 6G Networks. IEEE Netw. Novemb./Dec. 2020, 34, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aggarwal, S.; Kumar, N.; Tanwar, S. Blockchain-Envisioned UAV Communication Using 6G Networks: Open Issues, Use Cases, and Future Directions. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 5416–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sekaran, R.; Patan, R.; Raveendran, A.; Al-Turjman, F.; Ramachandran, M.; Mostarda, L. Survival Study on Blockchain Based 6G-Enabled Mobile Edge Computation for IoT Automation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 143453–143463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bashir, S.; Alsharif, M.H.; Khan, I.; Albreem, M.A.; Sali, A.; Mohd Ali, B.; Noh, W. MIMO-Terahertz in 6G Nano-Communications: Channel Modeling and Analysis. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2020, 66, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Alsharif, M.H.; Albreem, M.A.; Solyman, A.A.A.; Kim, S. Toward 6G Communication Networks: Terahertz Frequency Challenges and Open Research Issues. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2020, 66, 2831–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tripathi, S.; Sabu, N.V.; Gupta, A.K.; Dhillon, H.S. Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Spectrum for 6G Wireless. In Computer Communications and Networks; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 83–121. ISBN 9783030727765. [Google Scholar]
  120. Khan, L.U.; Saad, W.; Niyato, D.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. Digital-Twin-Enabled 6G: Vision, Architectural Trends, and Future Directions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2022, 60, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Alkhateeb, A.; Jiang, S.; Charan, G. Real-Time Digital Twins: Vision and Research Directions for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lin, X.; Kundu, L.; Dick, C.; Obiodu, E.; Mostak, T.; Flaxman, M. 6G Digital Twin Networks: From Theory to Practice. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhang, H.; Shlezinger, N.; Guidi, F.; Dardari, D.; Imani, M.F.; Eldar, Y.C. Near-Field Wireless Power Transfer for 6G Internet of Everything Mobile Networks: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2022, 60, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Che, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Luo, S.; Wu, K.; Duan, L.; Leung, V.C.M. UAV-Aided Wireless Energy Transfer for Sustaining Internet of Everything in 6G. Drones 2023, 7, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Singh, S.P.; Kumar, N.; Singh, A.; Kant Singh, K.; Askar, S.S.; Abouhawwash, M. Energy Efficient Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Internet of Everything (IoE)-Enabled 6G. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 63839–63852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, Y.; Zhao, J. Mobile Edge Computing, Metaverse, 6G Wireless Communications, Artificial Intelligence, and Blockchain: Survey and Their Convergence. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 8th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Yokohama, Japan, 26 October–11 November 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  127. Ishtiaq, M.; Saeed, N.; Khan, M.A. Edge Computing in IoT: A 6G Perspective. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.08943. [Google Scholar]
  128. Park, Y.M.; Hassan, S.S.; Tun, Y.K.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. Joint Resources and Phase-Shift Optimization of MEC-Enabled UAV in IRS-Assisted 6G THz Networks. In Proceedings of the NOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, Budapest, Hungary, 25–29 April 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  129. Dursun, Y.; Goktas, M.B.; Ding, Z. Green NOMA Based MU-MIMO Transmission for MEC in 6G Networks. Comput. Netw. 2023, 228, 109749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Li, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Guo, S. IRS-Based MEC for Delay-Constrained QoS over RF-Powered 6G Mobile Wireless Networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 8722–8737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Osama, M.; Ateya, A.A.; Ahmed Elsaid, S.; Muthanna, A. Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Assisted Systems. Information 2022, 13, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Anti-Drone Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component (Hardware, Software), by Type (Ground Based, Handheld), by Range (Less than 5 km), by Technology, by Mitigation, by Defense, by End Use, by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2025–2030. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/anti-drone-market (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  133. Detailed Market Report on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market, Featuring Industry Analysis, Size, and Forecast from 2025 to 2030. Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/uav-market (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  134. UAV (Drone) Market Size, Share, Trends and Growth Analysis. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/unmanned-aerial-vehicles-uav-market-662.html# (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  135. Anafi USA. Available online: https://www.parrot.com/us/drones/anafi-usa (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  136. Anafi AI. Available online: https://www.parrot.com/us/drones/anafi-ai (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  137. EVO Lite+. Available online: https://www.autelrobotics.com/productdetail/evo-lite-series-drones/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  138. EVO II Pro. Available online: https://shop.autelrobotics.com/collections/autel-evo-ii-series (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  139. Skydio 2+. Available online: https://www.skydio.com/skydio-2-plus-enterprise (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  140. Skydio X2D. Available online: https://www.skydio.com/x2d (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  141. Typhoon H Plus. Available online: https://yuneec.online/typhoon-h-plus/info/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  142. Mantis Q. Available online: https://yuneec.pl/eng_m_SHOP_DRONES_Yuneec-Mantis-Q-1092.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  143. Zino Mini Pro. Available online: https://www.hubsanus.com/zino-mini-pro.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  144. Hubsan ACE 2. Available online: https://www.hubsan.com/na/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1410 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  145. HS720G. Available online: https://www.holystone.com/en/Drones/Premium/HS720G.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  146. HS710. Available online: https://www.holystone.com/en/Drones/Premium/HS710.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  147. JJRC. Available online: https://www.jjrc.com/goods/drone.html (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  148. Walkera. Available online: https://en.walkera.com/?lang=en (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  149. Mohsan, S.A.H.; Khan, M.A.; Noor, F.; Ullah, I.; Alsharif, M.H. Towards the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2022, 6, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Masaoka, R.; Tran, G.K.; Nakazato, J.; Sakaguchi, K. The Future of Flying Base Stations: Empirical and Numerical Investigations of mmWave-Enabled UAVs. Future Internet 2023, 16, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ackerman, E. Solar-Powered RoboBee X-Wing Flies Untethered. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/solar-powered-robobee-xwing-flies-untethered (accessed on 7 February 2025).
  152. DelFly. Available online: https://www.delfly.nl/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  153. Wasp®AE RQ-12A. Available online: https://www.avinc.com/images/uploads/product_docs/Wasp_Datasheet_2017_Web_v1.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  154. SIERRA. Available online: https://impact.earthdata.nasa.gov/casei/platform/SIERRA (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  155. Global Hawk High-Altitude Long-Endurance Aircraft. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/aeronautics/global-hawk-uas/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  156. PARROT DISCO. Available online: https://www.parrot.com/en/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  157. Parrot Disco-Pro. Available online: https://www.parrot.com/en/support/documentation/disco-range/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  158. Kogan Drone. Available online: https://www.kogan.com/au/buy/kogan-horizon-4k-drone-kogan-drone/ (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  159. Scout B-330 UAV Helicopter. Available online: https://www.aeroscout.ch/index.php/scout-uav-helicopters/scout-uav-helicopters-2 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  160. MQ-9A “Reaper”. Available online: https://www.ga-asi.com/remotely-piloted-aircraft/mq-9a (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  161. DJI Spreading Wings S900. Available online: https://www.dji.com/spreading-wings-s900 (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  162. Ganesh Kumar, S.S.; Gudipalli, A. A Comprehensive Review on Payloads of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2024, 27, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Estevez, J.; Garate, G.; Lopez-Guede, J.M.; Larrea, M. Review of Aerial Transportation of Suspended-Cable Payloads with Quadrotors. Drones 2024, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Byomakesh, M.; Deepika, G.; Sharma, P.K. UAV-Assisted C-RAN for on-Demand Cellular Coverage: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.15548. [Google Scholar]
  165. Mostafa, A.F.; Abdel-Kader, M.; Gadallah, Y. A UAV-Based Coverage Gap Detection and Resolution in Cellular Networks: A Machine-Learning Approach. Comput. Commun. 2024, 215, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nahiyoon, S.A.; Ren, Z.; Wei, P.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Yan, X.; Yuan, H. Recent Development Trends in Plant Protection UAVs: A Journey from Conventional Practices to Cutting-Edge Technologies—A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2024, 8, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Du, W.; Zheng, D.; Wang, S.; Li, Y. Multi-UAV Collaborative Surveillance Network Recovery via Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 34528–34540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Adnan, M.H.; Zukarnain, Z.A.; Amodu, O.A. Fundamental Design Aspects of UAV-Enabled MEC Systems: A Review on Models, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2024, 51, 100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, Y.; Kuang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Hou, F. Task Offloading and Trajectory Optimization for Secure Communications in Dynamic User Multi-UAV MEC Systems. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024, 23, 14427–14440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Yazid, Y.; Ez-Zazi, I.; Guerrero-González, A.; El Oualkadi, A.; Arioua, M. UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge-Computing for IoT Based on AI: A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2021, 5, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Abrar, M.; Ajmal, U.; Almohaimeed, Z.M.; Gui, X.; Akram, R.; Masroor, R. Energy Efficient UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing for IoT Devices: A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 127779–127798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Huda, S.M.A.; Moh, S. Survey on Computation Offloading in UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 201, 103341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Jia, S.; Wang, R.; Lou, Y.; Wang, N.; Zhang, D.; Singh, K.; Mumtaz, S. Secrecy Performance Analysis of UAV-Assisted Ambient Backscatter Communications with Jamming. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 18111–18125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zhou, Y.; Al-nahari, A.; Jäntti, R.; Ma, Z.; Fan, P. Energy-Efficient Covert Communications for UAV-Assisted Backscatter Systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 9147–9152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Tezza, D.; Andujar, M. The State-of-the-Art of Human–Drone Interaction: A Survey. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 167438–167454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Ateya, A.A.; Muthanna, A.; Gudkova, I.; Gaidamaka, Y.; Algarni, A.D. Latency and Energy-Efficient Multi-Hop Routing Protocol for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2019, 15, 155014771986639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Min, W.; Khakimov, A.; Ateya, A.A.; ElAffendi, M.; Muthanna, A.; Abd El-Latif, A.A.; Muthanna, M.S.A. Dynamic Offloading in Flying Fog Computing: Optimizing IoT Network Performance with Mobile Drones. Drones 2023, 7, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive UAV Networks Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. IEEE J. Miniaturizat. Air Space Syst. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Heo, K.; Lee, W.; Lee, K. UAV-Assisted Wireless-Powered Secure Communications: Integration of Optimization and Deep Learning. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2024, 23, 10530–10545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hedhly, W.; Amin, O.; Shihada, B.; Alouini, M.-S. A Power Saving Scheme for IEEE 802.15.3d THz Wireless Communication Links. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023, 22, 1912–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhu, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Tan, B.; Jin, S. Cell-Free Terahertz Networks: A Spatial-Spectral Approach. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2024, 13, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Singya, P.K.; Makki, B.; D’Errico, A.; Alouini, M.-S. High-Rate Reliable Communication Using Multi-Hop and Mesh THz/FSO Networks. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 3804–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sara, C.; Andrea, P.; Giampaolo, C.; Alessia, T.; Chiara, B.; Roberto, V. Performance Analysis of Multi-Hop Networks at Terahertz Frequencies. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.06330. [Google Scholar]
  184. Sarkar, D.; Yogita; Yadav, S.S.; Pal, V.; Kumar, N.; Patra, S.K. A Comprehensive Survey on IRS-Assisted NOMA-Based 6G Wireless Network: Design Perspectives, Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2024, 21, 2539–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Long, W.; Chen, R.; Moretti, M.; Zhang, W.; Li, J. A Promising Technology for 6G Wireless Networks: Intelligent Reflecting Surface. J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 2021, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ihsan, A.; Chen, W.; Asif, M.; Khan, W.U.; Wu, Q.; Li, J. Energy-Efficient IRS-Aided NOMA Beamforming for 6G Wireless Communications. IEEE Trans. On Green Commun. Netw. 2022, 6, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Khan, M.A.; Kumar, N.; Mohsan, S.A.H.; Khan, W.U.; Nasralla, M.M.; Alsharif, M.H.; Żywiołek, J.; Ullah, I. Swarm of UAVs for Network Management in 6G: A Technical Review. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2023, 20, 741–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Javed, S.; Hassan, A.; Ahmad, R.; Ahmed, W.; Ahmed, R.; Saadat, A.; Guizani, M. State-of-the-Art and Future Research Challenges in UAV Swarms. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 19023–19045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Tariq, Z.U.A.; Baccour, E.; Erbad, A.; Hamdi, M.; Guizani, M. RL-Based Adaptive UAV Swarm Formation and Clustering for Secure 6G Wireless Communications in Dynamic Dense Environments. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 125609–125628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. González-Prelcic, N.; Furkan Keskin, M.; Kaltiokallio, O.; Valkama, M.; Dardari, D.; Shen, X.; Shen, Y.; Bayraktar, M.; Wymeersch, H. The Integrated Sensing and Communication Revolution for 6G: Vision, Techniques, and Applications. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2024, 112, 676–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Warrier, A.; Aljaburi, L.; Whitworth, H.; Al-Rubaye, S.; Tsourdos, A. Future 6G Communications Powering Vertical Handover in Non-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 33016–33034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Park, Y.M.; Hassan, S.S.; Tun, Y.K.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. Joint Trajectory and Resource Optimization of MEC-Assisted UAVs in Sub-THz Networks: A Resources-Based Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization DRL with Attention Mechanism. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 2003–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Asim, M.; ELAffendi, M.; El-Latif, A.A.A. Multi-IRS and Multi-UAV-Assisted MEC System for 5G/6G Networks: Efficient Joint Trajectory Optimization and Passive Beamforming Framework. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 4553–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Li, R.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y. Federated Learning via Over-the-Air Computation in IRS-Assisted UAV Communications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Gao, Y.; Xue, H.; Zhang, L.; Sun, E. UAV Trajectory Design and Power Optimization for Terahertz Band-Integrated Sensing and Communications. Sensors 2023, 23, 3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hassan, S.S.; Min Park, Y.; Tun, Y.K.; Saad, W.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. 3TO: THz-Enabled Throughput and Trajectory Optimization of UAVs in 6G Networks by Proximal Policy Optimization Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the ICC 2022—IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 16–20 May 2022; pp. 5712–5718. [Google Scholar]
  197. Park, Y.M.; Tun, Y.K.; Han, Z.; Hong, C.S. Trajectory Optimization and Phase-Shift Design in IRS-Assisted UAV Network for Smart Railway. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 11317–11321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Du, W.; Long, K.; Nallanathan, A. IRS Empowered UAV Wireless Communication with Resource Allocation, Reflecting Design and Trajectory Optimization. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 21, 7867–7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Pang, X.; Zhao, N.; Tang, J.; Wu, C.; Niyato, D.; Wong, K.-K. IRS-Assisted Secure UAV Transmission via Joint Trajectory and Beamforming Design. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2022, 70, 1140–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Tariq, Z.U.A.; Baccour, E.; Erbad, A.; Hamdi, M. Reinforcement Learning for Resilient Aerial-IRS Assisted Wireless Communications Networks in the Presence of Multiple Jammers. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Saleh, A.M.; Omar, S.S.; Abd El-Haleem, A.M.; Ibrahim, I.I.; Abdelhakam, M.M. Trajectory Optimization of UAV-IRS Assisted 6G THz Network Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 18501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Omar, S.S.; El-Haleem, A.M.A.; Ibrahim, I.I.; Saleh, A.M. Capacity Enhancement of Flying-IRS Assisted 6G THz Network Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 101616–101629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Huang, C.; Chen, G.; Xiao, P.; Mi, D.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, H.; Lu, C.; Tafazolli, R. Federated Learning for RIS-Assisted UAV-Enabled Wireless Networks: Learning-Based Optimization for UAV Trajectory, RIS Phase Shifts and Weighted Aggregation. In Proceedings of the IECON 2023—49th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Singapore, 16–19 October 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  204. Shvetsov, A.V.; Alsamhi, S.H.; Hawbani, A.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, S.; Agarwal, S.; Rajput, N.S.; Alammari, A.A.; Nashwan, F.M.A. Federated Learning Meets Intelligence Reflection Surface in Drones for Enabling 6G Networks: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 130860–130887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Yang, K.; Dong, R.; Gao, W.; Shu, F.; Shi, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Multi-Stream Transmission for Directional Modulation Network via Distributed Multi-UAV-Aided Multi-Active-IRS. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Lin, X. 3GPP Evolution from 5G to 6G: A 10-Year Retrospective. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.21077. [Google Scholar]
  207. Liu, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, R.Y.-N.; Renzo, M.D. The ITU Vision and Framework for 6G: Scenarios, Capabilities, and Enablers. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2025, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Adhatarao, S.S.; Despotovic, Z.; Jorguseski, L.; Brandsma, E.; Corujo, D.; Hecker, A. Standardization Roadmap towards Sustainable 6G. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), Belgrade, Serbia, 25–27 November 2024; pp. 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  209. Marcus, M.J.; Ghosh, M. ITU-R Study Group Issues for 2023–2027 of Likely Interest to Wireless Researchers. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Guidelines for Evaluation of Radio Interface Technologies for IMT-2020; Report ITU-R M.2412. Available online: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2412-2017-PDF-E.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2025).
  211. Future Technology Trends of Terrestrial International Mobile Telecommunications Systems towards 2030 and beyond. Report ITU-R M.2516. Available online: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2516-2022-PDF-E.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2025).
  212. Technology Trends of Active Services in the Frequency Range 275–3000 GHz. Report ITU-R SM.2352. Available online: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-SM.2352-2015-PDF-E.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2025).
  213. Experiential Networked Intelligence (ENI). ETSI. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/technologies/experiential-networked-intelligence (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  214. Zero Touch Network & Service Management (ZSM). ETSI. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/technologies/zero-touch-network-service-management (accessed on 4 March 2025).
  215. Martinez-Julia, P.; Kafle, V.P.; Asaeda, H. Application of Category Theory to Network Service Fault Detection. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 5, 4417–4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Tarrías, A.; Moreno, A.A.; Pareja, F.J.; Baena, E.; Fortes, S.; Barco, R. Toward Zero-Touch Cellular Networks via next-Generation Crowdsourcing. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 167489–167497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS); Dynamic Spectrum Allocation Service (DSAS); System Requirements. ETSI TS 104 011. 2024. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/104000_104099/104011/01.01.01_60/ts_104011v010101p.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2025).
  218. Reconfigurable Radio Systems (RRS); Radio Equipment (RE) Information Models and Protocols for Generalized Software Reconfiguration Architecture; Part 3: Generalized Unified Radio Application Interface (gURAI). ETSI TS 103 681-3 V1.1.1. 2020. Available online: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103600_103699/10368103/01.01.01_60/ts_10368103v010101p.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2025).
Figure 1. Main challenges with 6G applications.
Figure 1. Main challenges with 6G applications.
Jsan 14 00030 g001
Figure 2. Key enabling technologies of 6G applications.
Figure 2. Key enabling technologies of 6G applications.
Jsan 14 00030 g002
Figure 3. Challenges with the UAV deployment.
Figure 3. Challenges with the UAV deployment.
Jsan 14 00030 g003
Table 1. Key notation.
Table 1. Key notation.
NotationDescriptionNotationDescription
1GFirst generationuMUBUbiquitous mobile ultra-broadband
4GFourth generationBCI Brain–computer interface
5GFifth generationuHDDUltra-high data density
6GSixth generationAIArtificial intelligence
UAVUnmanned aerial vehicleIoTInternet of Things
EBExabytesARAugmented reality
3GPPThird Generation Partnership ProjectVRVirtual reality
3DThree-dimensionalMRMixed reality
KPIKey performance indicatorRANRadio Access Network
mMTCMassive machine-type communicationsuHSLLCUltra-high-speed-with-low-latency communications
eMBBenhanced Mobile BroadbandTHzTerahertz
uRLLCUltra-reliable and low-latency communicationsCaeCContextually Agile eMBB communications
RISReconfigurable intelligent surfacesUPFUser plane function
RTBCReal-time broadband communicationDIoEDevice-independent Internet of Everything
UCBCUplink-centric broadband communicationETSIEuropean Telecommunications Standards Institute
HCSHarmonized communication and sensingCOCComputational oriented communication
GbpsGigabits-per-secondZSMZero-touch service management
TbpsTerabit per secondE2EEnd-to-end
VLCVisible light communicationEDuRLLCEvent-defined uRLLC
mmWaveMillimeter-waveQoSQuality of service
LOSLine of sightMECMobile edge computing
IoEInternet of everythingMIMOMulti-input multi-output
RFRadiofrequencyCL-MIMOCo-located MIMO
NLOSNon-line-of-sightDM-MIMODistributed massive MIMO
EIEdge intelligenceQMLQuantum machine learning
LEDLight emitting diodeQKDQuantum key distribution
MACMedium access controlB-RANBlockchain radio access network
IIoTIndustrial Internet of ThingsQoEQuality of experience
BSBase stationFMVFull motion video
CRCognitive radioRRSReconfigurable radio system
VLBVisible light bandXAIExplainable AI
IRSIntelligent reflecting surfacesIECIntelligence edge computing
ENI ISGExperiential Networked Intelligence Industry Specification GroupIEEEInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
DSADynamic spectrum access WPANWireless personal area networking
ISGIndustry specification groupXRExtended reality
FPGAField-programmable gate arrayCAGRCompound annual growth rate
D2DDevice-to-deviceUM-MIMOUltra-massive MIMO
V2XVehicle-to-everythingCSIChannel state information
UWOCUnderwater wireless optical communicationsISTARInformation, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance
NRNew radioWLANWireless local area networking
MLMachine learningRRSReconfigurable radio system
V2VVehicle-to-vehicleITSIntelligent transportation system
FLFederated learningSSWMSite-specific weed management
UEUser equipmentDSMsDigital surface models
LANLocal area networkABSAerial base station
V2IVehicle-to-infrastructure RLReinforcement learning
EMElectromagneticBCBlockchain
QCQuantum communicationTC RRSTechnical Committee on RRS
NTNNon-terrestrial networkSRESmart radio environment
MDManagement domainPoCProof of Concept
ITUInternational Telecommunication UnionWRCWorld Radiocommunications Conference
ITU-T ITU-Telecommunication Standardization SectorE2E SMDEnd-to-end service management domain
LEOLow Earth Orbit ITU-R ITU-Radiocommunication Sector
AF/DFAmplify-and-forward/Decode-and-forwardIMTInternational Mobile Telecommunications
MBRLLCMobile broadband reliable low latency communicationseuRLLCEnhanced ultra-reliable and low-latency communications
KphKilometers per hourTbpsTerabits-per-second
Table 3. Comparative study of 4G, 5G, and 6G KPIs [1,8,26,29].
Table 3. Comparative study of 4G, 5G, and 6G KPIs [1,8,26,29].
Key Parameter4G5G6G
Carrier Bandwidth20 MHz400 MHzup to 100 GHz
Peak Data Rate1 Gbps10–20 Gbps1 Tbps
Latency100 ms5–10 ms10–20 us
Mobility350 km/h500 km/h1000 km/h
Reliability99.99%99.999%99.99999%
Connectivity DensityN/A 10 6 devices/km2 10 7 devices/km2
SecurityMediumMediumVery High
User Experience Rate10 Mbps100 Mbps10 Gbps
Table 4. Key requirements of novel 6G applications [3,14,15,17].
Table 4. Key requirements of novel 6G applications [3,14,15,17].
ApplicationsSupport 4G/5GReliabilityLatencyData Rate
Holographic communicationNot supportedUltra-highExtremely lowExtremely high
Ultra-realistic XR, 16K streamingLimited support in 5GUltra-highExtremely lowExtremely high
Enhanced mobile InternetPartial support in 5GHighLowHigh
Immersive AR/VR gaming and streaming experiencesPartial support in 5GUltra-highExtremely lowExtremely high
Autonomous vehicular systemsPartial support in 5GUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Smart cities and IoT ecosystemsSupport in 4G/5GHighLowHigh
Industrial automation (Industry 5.0)Partial support in 5GUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Autonomous drivingExperimental in 5GUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Remote surgery/TelesurgeryNot supportedUltra-highExtremely lowExtremely high
Tactile InternetNot supportedUltra-HighExtremely lowHigh
Drone swarmsPartial support in 5GHighLowHigh
Precision agricultureSupported in 4G/5GHighLowHigh
Environmental monitoringSupported in 4G/5GHighLowHigh
Smart manufacturingPartial supportUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and neurotechnologyNot supportedUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Haptics interfacesNot supportedUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Augmented human capabilitiesPartial supportUltra-highExtremely lowHigh
Ethical AI governanceEmerging in 5GHighLowHigh
Empathic/effective communicationNot supportedHighExtremely lowHigh
Table 5. Potential applications of blockchain technology in 6G networks [56,57,58,59].
Table 5. Potential applications of blockchain technology in 6G networks [56,57,58,59].
Main ApplicationPotential BenefitsDiscussion
Decentralized security and privacy protectionTrustless authenticationBlockchain obviates the need for authentication service (vendor) with zero-trust architectures, further opening the novelty of security flaws.
Data integrity and privacySmart contracts can ensure end-to-end encryption, identity authentication, and secure key exchanges in 6G IoT environments.
Resistant to cyber threatsIn uRLLC services, blockchain prevents plain-text data corruption, Sybil attacks, and unauthorized access.
FL and secure AI
training
Distributed AI modelsBlockchain improves FL by allowing AI model updates on the device to be trusted in the black box without disclosing raw data.
Reputation managementParticipants in FL can be scored based on the quality of their contributions, guaranteeing fairness in collaborative AI training.
Blockchain-based
radio access networks (B-RANs)
Decentralized resource allocationBlockchain enables spectrum management, network slicing, and access control in 6G wireless networks.
Service-level agreements (SLAs)Smart contracts can dynamically set SLAs between network providers and users, which can increase service reliability.
Enhancing MEC and
IoT security
Trustworthy MEC transactionsBlockchain provides secure and transparent communication among edge nodes in distributed computing systems.
IoT authentication and access controlBlockchain-enabled identity verification against spoofing, illegitimate device accesses, and data leaks are avoided.
Blockchain in
emerging 6G services
Secure autonomous vehicle communicationBlockchain adds to V2X networks by providing communication that is its type of “tamper-proof” as well as safe vehicular navigation.
Decentralized energy tradingBlockchain can benefit smart grids by facilitating peer-to-peer energy trading and promoting sustainable energy.
UAV and drone securitySecure, blockchain-based communication protocols protect against hijacking, GPS spoofing, and unauthorized drone access.
Table 6. Key features of EI for 6G networks [46,62,63].
Table 6. Key features of EI for 6G networks [46,62,63].
FeatureDescription
AI-driven processingDeploys AI/ML algorithms at the edge for real-time data analysis and decision-making.
FLEnables distributed AI model training without transmitting raw data to centralized cloud servers.
Adaptive resource allocationDynamically optimizes computational and networking resources based on demand.
Energy efficiencyReduces energy consumption by avoiding continuous cloud communication.
Self-learning and automationEnables self-optimizing and autonomous networks with minimal human intervention.
Table 7. Key applications of EI in 6G networks [62,63].
Table 7. Key applications of EI in 6G networks [62,63].
ApplicationRole of EI
Autonomous vehiclesEnables real-time processing for object detection, navigation, and collision avoidance.
Smart citiesSupports intelligent traffic management, surveillance, and environmental monitoring.
IIoTFacilitates predictive maintenance, automation, and process optimization in factories.
Healthcare and remote surgeryEnsures low-latency AI-powered diagnostics and robotic-assisted surgeries.
AR and VRIt provides a seamless, low-latency gaming experience and immersive applications.
Smart grid and energy optimizationAI-driven demand forecasting and real-time energy distribution.
Table 8. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying EI for 6G networks.
Table 8. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying EI for 6G networks.
ChallengePotential Solution
Scalability issuesHierarchical edge computing with dynamic resource allocation.
Security and privacyBlockchain-based authentication and FL for secure AI.
Interoperability issuesDevelopment of standardized APIs and protocols for seamless edge–cloud interaction.
Energy consumptionUse lightweight AI models and energy-efficient hardware accelerators (e.g., TinyML).
Data synchronization and consistencyAI-driven edge orchestration for real-time data consistency across nodes.
Table 9. Potential applications and use cases of DT in 6G networks [66,67].
Table 9. Potential applications and use cases of DT in 6G networks [66,67].
Application DomainUse CasesBenefits
Smart manufacturing (Industry 5.0)Predictive maintenance, real-time process optimization, automation of supply chainsReduced downtime, increased efficiency, lower costs
Healthcare and precision medicinePersonalized treatment models, virtual testing of drugs, digital avatars for patientsImproved diagnostics, better patient care, reduced trial costs
Smart citiesTraffic flow optimization, energy management, environmental monitoringImproved urban planning, efficient resource utilization
Autonomous vehicles and intelligent transportationV2X communication, digital twins for roads, simulation-based AI trainingSafer, more efficient transportation systems
Core networksNetwork optimization, spectrum allocation, real-time troubleshootingEnhanced performance, minimal service disruption
Aerospace and defenseFlight simulations, predictive maintenance, performance analysisIncreased operational reliability, cost savings
Energy and utilitiesSmart grid management, renewable energy integration, real-time power distributionEnhanced efficiency, better sustainability
Table 10. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying DT for 6G networks [64,65,66,67,68].
Table 10. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying DT for 6G networks [64,65,66,67,68].
ChallengeDescriptionPotential Solution
ScalabilityManaging billions of IoT devices and their digital twins is computationally demanding.Distributed computing, edge intelligence, and hierarchical DT frameworks.
Security and privacyContinuous data exchange between physical and virtual twins raises privacy concerns.Blockchain-based secure data management, zero-trust architectures.
InteroperabilityDifferent industries and applications require unique DT models, leading to compatibility issues.Development of standardized DT frameworks and open APIs.
AI model reliabilityAI-driven DT models must be highly accurate for predictive simulations.FL and real-time model retraining.
Energy efficiencyDT applications require high computational power, increasing energy consumption.Green AI techniques, optimized resource allocation.
Table 11. Potential applications and use cases of robot avatar in 6G networks [70,71,72].
Table 11. Potential applications and use cases of robot avatar in 6G networks [70,71,72].
DomainUse CaseBenefits
Healthcare and
telemedicine
Remote robotic surgery, patient
monitoring, AI-assisted therapy
Enables precise, real-time surgeries, improves healthcare access
Education and trainingVirtual classrooms, skill-based
learning, AI tutors
Enhances remote learning, facilitates hands-on training
Industrial automationSmart factories, remote equipment handling, predictive maintenanceIncreases efficiency, reduces human exposure to hazardous conditions
Space and deep-sea
exploration
Robotic space missions, deep-sea research, disaster recoveryEnables human-like exploration in extreme environments
Entertainment and
social interaction
AI-driven virtual assistants, gaming, companionship robotsEnhances immersive experiences, provides emotional support
Retail and customer serviceAI-driven shopping assistants,
virtual sales representatives
Improves customer engagement, offers personalized recommendations
Table 12. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying robot avatar for 6G networks [69,70].
Table 12. Challenges and potential solutions of deploying robot avatar for 6G networks [69,70].
ChallengeDescriptionPotential Solution
Human-like realismCreating avatars that realistically mimic human movements and expressions.AI-driven motion prediction and real-time facial tracking.
Latency reductionEnsuring real-time responsiveness in remote control applications.6G-enabled edge computing and uRLLC.
Security and privacyPreventing unauthorized access, data breaches, and identity theft.Blockchain-based authentication and zero-trust architecture.
InteroperabilityEnsuring seamless integration with existing digital ecosystems.Standardization of APIs and communication protocols.
User experienceEnhancing immersion, natural communication, and emotional intelligence.AI-powered speech recognition and sentiment analysis.
Table 13. Capabilities of AI-based robot avatar for 6G networks [73,74].
Table 13. Capabilities of AI-based robot avatar for 6G networks [73,74].
AI CapabilityFunction in Robot AvatarsApplications
Natural language processing (NLP)Enables speech recognition and conversation understanding.AI tutors, virtual assistants.
Computer visionAllows avatars to recognize faces, gestures, and objects.Remote customer service, healthcare assistance.
Reinforcement learningHelps avatars learn from experiences for better decision-making.Industrial automation and robotics research.
Predictive analyticsAnticipates user needs and responses.Personalized AI companions, smart retail.
Table 14. Capabilities of blockchain-based robot avatar for 6G networks [75,76].
Table 14. Capabilities of blockchain-based robot avatar for 6G networks [75,76].
Blockchain FeatureImpact on Robot AvatarsExample Use Case
Decentralized identityPrevents impersonation and identity fraud.Secure login for virtual assistants.
Smart contractsAutomates service agreements.Robot-as-a-Service (RaaS) deployment.
Data integrity and traceabilityEnsures recorded interactions are immutable.Healthcare avatars managing patient history.
Tokenized economySupports microtransactions for digital avatars.AI-powered digital artists, avatar-based e-commerce.
Table 15. Use cases of network automation in 6G networks [77,78,79,80].
Table 15. Use cases of network automation in 6G networks [77,78,79,80].
Use CaseFunctionExpected Impact
Autonomous resource schedulingAI-driven allocation of spectrum and computing resources.Improves efficiency and reduces congestion.
Proactive cachingPredictive content caching in edge servers.It enhances user experience and reduces latency.
Service orchestration and slicingAutomated slicing of resources based on user demands.Enables flexible and dynamic service provisioning.
Energy-aware RAN optimizationAdaptive power management for base stations.Minimizes energy consumption and lowers costs.
End-to-end security managementAI-powered anomaly detection and threat response.Strengthens network security.
Table 16. Applications of common AI and ML techniques in automating 6G operations [77,81].
Table 16. Applications of common AI and ML techniques in automating 6G operations [77,81].
AI/ML TechniqueApplication for 6G AutomationImpact
Deep RL (DRL)Adaptive optimization of network functions.Reduces latency and enhances resource utilization.
FLDistributed AI model training across multiple network nodes.Enhances privacy and reduces data transfer overhead.
Neural networks (NNs)Intelligent fault detection and predictive maintenance.Improves network reliability.
Supervised learningTraffic classification and QoS prediction.Enhances network efficiency.
Unsupervised learningAnomaly detection in network traffic.Strengthens cybersecurity.
Table 17. Summary of recent studies on key enabling technologies of 6G.
Table 17. Summary of recent studies on key enabling technologies of 6G.
RefKey Enabling TechnologyMajor Contributions
[82]Supermassive MIMOThis work introduces a new antenna design with promising features for future 6G devices, with plans to expand its capabilities.
[83]AI, ultra-massive-MIMO, THz frequencyThis study investigates the prospective advancements of 6G wireless and emphasizes the transformative impact 6G may have on communication systems by implementing smart network infrastructures.
[84]Massive MIMOThis work explores the potential of M-MIMO systems in B5G networks.
[85]ML, mmWave, massive MIMOThis work explores the crucial role of ML algorithms in optimizing mmWave massive MIMO systems.
[86]XL-MIMOThis paper dives deep into a key technology for 6G networks—extremely large-scale MIMO (XL-MIMO).
[87]Massive MIMOThis paper provides an overview of Massive MIMO.
[88]THz, MIMOThis article dives into the technical aspects of achieving extreme connectivity in future 6G networks, specifically focusing on the concept of “TKµ”.
[89]MIMOThis paper comprehensively overviews massive MIMO systems and their role as key enabling technologies.
[90]Massive MIMORecent studies on massive MIMO technologies.
[91]Holographic MIMOThis article explores promising new technology for future 6G networks: holographic MIMO surfaces (HMIMOSs).
[92]AIThis paper delves into the potential of AI to revolutionize 6G networks through knowledge engineering.
[93]AI, VRThis study explores the potential of integrating AI, VR, and high-speed 6G networks into classroom environments to enhance the learning experience.
[94]AIThis article takes a pioneering approach to quantifying trust in AI for future wireless communication networks.
[95]AIThis review highlights XAI as a crucial research area for developing trustworthy 6G networks.
[96]AIThis paper presents a vision for 6G that focuses on achieving significant cost reductions to enable near-universal connectivity.
[73]AI, AI-computing, metaverseThis survey explores the potential of integrating 6G edge intelligence into the metaverse, a future immersive virtual world.
[97]AR, BlockchainDiscusses the adoption of blockchain for ensuring data privacy in AR applications within 6G networks.
[98]Blockchain, AR/VRThis article explores the potential of combining BC technology with 6G networks to support secure and reliable AR/VR applications in Industry 4.0.
[99]VLCThis paper explores the potential of VLC as a key technology for future 6G networks.
[100]VLC, IoTSurveys VLC in 6G IoT architecture, focusing on security aspects and implementation.
[101]VLCThis research paper explores a novel approach to improve security in VLC systems for future wireless networks.
[102]VLC, MLThis paper explores the potential of integrating FL into VLC systems.
[103]Robot avatar, XRThis paper proposes a novel approach for programming robots using a combination of collaborative reality (CR) and XR technologies.
[104]MetaverseThis paper explores the network infrastructure needed to support the metaverse in future 6G networks.
[105]AI/ML, zero-touch networkThis paper explores using AI and ML to improve network integration between satellite and terrestrial communication systems.
[106]Zero-touch networkThis paper discusses a new approach to network management called ZSM, which aims to automate network operations in 5G and future 6G networks.
[107]Zero-touch network, IoTProposes a zero-touch network-based router management scheme for 6G IoT ecosystems.
[108]Zero-touch network, IIoTThis paper proposes a new framework (AdaptSDN) to address security challenges in IIoT applications on future 6G networks.
[109]BlockchainThis paper explores the potential of blockchain technology to address trust-related challenges and pave the way for secure and efficient 6G networks.
[110]BlockchainThis article explores the potential of blockchain technology to manage resources and enable new applications in future 6G networks.
[111]BlockchainExplores challenges and opportunities related to blockchain integration in 6G networks.
[112]BlockchainThis paper explores the promising integration of blockchain technology into future 6G wireless networks.
[113]Blockchain, IoTThis paper examines the potential of combining 6G-enabled IoT with blockchain technology.
[114]Blockchain, AIDemonstrates the effectiveness of blockchain for data security in AI applications within 6G networks.
[115]Blockchain, UAVsProposes a blockchain-envisioned security solution for UAV communication in 6G networks.
[116]Blockchain, IoT, MECThis paper explores the challenges and opportunities of integrating blockchain technology with 6G-enabled IoT networks.
[117]THz, MIMOThis paper introduces a new channel model designed specifically for THz communication and MIMO systems.
[118]THzThis paper explores the potential of THz technology as a key enabler for future 6G networks.
[119]THz, mmWaveThis paper explores the role of mmWave and THz frequencies in supporting the growing demands of wireless communication systems.
[120]Digital TwinThis paper proposes using digital twins as a key enabling technology for future 6G networks.
[121]Digital TwinThis article explores using digital twins for future wireless communication and sensing systems.
[122]Digital TwinThis article highlights the potential of DT networks (DTNs) as a revolutionary tool for designing and managing future 6G networks
[123]IoEThis article explores the potential of near-field radiating WPT as a solution for powering devices in future 6G networks, particularly IoE.
[124]IoE, UAVThis article explores the challenges and opportunities of using UAVs for wireless energy transfer (WET) in future 6G networks, particularly in IoE.
[125]IoEThis article proposes a novel hybrid algorithm for optimizing resource allocation in 6G networks designed for the IoE.
[126]MECThis paper explores the role of MEC in enabling metaverse over future 6G communication networks.
[127]MECThis paper focuses on edge computing in the context of future 6G networks and the IoT.
[128]UAV, IRS, MEC, THzOptimizes resource allocation and phase-shift for MEC-enabled UAVs in IRS-assisted 6G THz networks.
[129]MIMO, MECThis paper investigates energy consumption in 6G networks that utilize three key technologies: NOMA, MIMO, and MEC.
[130]MEC, IRSThis paper addresses the challenge of minimizing delays in MEC systems for future 6G networks.
Table 18. Main features of common market available drones.
Table 18. Main features of common market available drones.
ManufacturerVisionModelSpecificationsMain
Applications
Communication
Interface
Communication RangeRecommended UsesRef.
ParrotParrot is known for its versatile and cutting-edge drones serving both consumer and commercial markets. Anafi USA
  • 32x zoom
  • 4K HDR video
  • Thermal imaging
  • Inspection
  • Surveillance
  • Mapping
Wi-FiUp to 4 kmProfessional use in security and inspection[135]
Anafi AI
  • 4K HDR video
  • FPV mode
  • 3-axis stabilization
  • Immersive flight experience
Wi-FiUp to 4 kmEnthusiast-level FPV flying[136]
Autel
Robotics
Autel Robotics is recognized for its advanced EVO series featuring high-end camera capabilities and robust designs.EVO Lite+
  • 1-inch CMOS sensor
  • 6K video
  • 40 min flight time
  • Aerial photography
  • Videography
Autel SkyLinkUp to 12 kmProfessional and enthusiast photography[137]
EVO II Pro
  • 6K video
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 40 min flight time
  • High-end aerial imaging
Autel SkyLinkUp to 9 kmProfessional-grade videography[138]
SkydioSkydio is gaining prominence with its autonomous drone technology, particularly in defense applications.Skydio 2+
  • 4K60 HDR video
  • Autonomous flight
  • 360° obstacle avoidance
  • Autonomous filming
  • Inspection
5 GHz Wi-FiUp to 6 kmAutonomous tracking and filming[139]
Skydio X2D
  • Dual sensor
  • 4K60 HDR video
  • Thermal imaging
  • Defense
  • Inspection
  • Public Safety
5 GHz Wi-FiUp to 6 kmMilitary and industrial applications[140]
YuneecYuneec caters to both consumer and commercial markets with notable models.Typhoon H Plus
  • 1-inch sensor camera
  • 20MP stills
  • 4K video
  • Photography
  • Videography
2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHzUp to 1.6 kmProfessional aerial imaging[141]
Mantis Q
  • 4K video
  • Voice control
  • 33 min flight time
  • Recreational flying
  • Photography
2.4 GHzUp to 1.5 kmHobbyists and casual users[142]
HubsanHubsan offers a wide range of affordable, innovative drones for all user levelsZino Mini Pro
  • 48MP camera
  • 4K video
  • 40 min flight time
  • Consumer photography
  • Videography
Syncleas 3.0Up to 10 kmBeginner to intermediate aerial photography[143]
ACE 2
  • 4K UHD camera
  • Foldable design
  • Beginner-level aerial photography
5.8 GHz Wi-FiUp to 1 kmEntry-level users[144]
Holy StoneHoly Stone is known for its affordable yet high-quality drones that are suitable for beginners and experienced pilots.HS720G
  • 4K EIS camera
  • GPS
  • 26 min flight time
  • Recreational photography
  • Learning
2.4 GHzUp to 1 kmBeginners and hobbyists[145]
HS710
  • 4K UHD camera
  • GPS
  • Foldable design
  • Travel photography
  • Videography
5 GHz Wi-FiUp to 0.8 kmTravelers and casual users[146]
SymaSyma specializes in hobby-grade remote-controlled drones and helicopters.X500
  • 4K UHD camera
  • GPS
  • 26 min flight time
  • Learning
  • Recreational use
2.4 GHzUp to 0.8 kmEntry-level users[147]
X8 Pro
  • 720p HD camera
  • GPS
  • 9 min flight time
  • Recreational flying
  • Learning
2.4 GHzUp to 0.2 kmBeginners[147]
JJRCJJRC produces budget-friendly drones popular among hobbyists.X12
Aurora
  • 4K camera
  • GPS
  • 25 min flight time
  • Hobbyist photography
5 GHz Wi-FiUp to 1.2 kmHobbyists[148]
X17
  • 4K camera
  • GPS
  • 30 min flight time
  • Aerial photography
  • Videography
5 GHz Wi-FiUp to 1 kmHobbyists[148]
WalkeraWalkera offers a range of drones catering to various needs, from entry-level to advanced usersVit Drone
  • 4K camera
  • Modular payloads
  • Professional aerial photography
5.8 GHzUp to 2 kmIndustrial applications[149]
F210 3D
  • FPV racing drone
  • 700TVL camera
  • Racing
  • FPV flying
5.8 GHzUp to 0.8 kmDrone racing
enthusiasts
[149]
Table 19. Main features of UAVs categories [150,151].
Table 19. Main features of UAVs categories [150,151].
CategoryDescriptionSizeSpecificationsTypical
Altitude
ApplicationsExamples
NanoNano UAVs are extremely small, with a wingspan of less than 7.5 cm<15 cm
  • Weight: <250g
  • Battery: 5–10 min
  • Camera: 720p or none
<50 m
  • Indoor flying
  • Beginner training
  • DJI Tello
  • Hubsan Q4 Nano
  • Holy Stone HS190
  • Robobee X-wing
MicroMico UAVs have wingspans ranging from 7.5 cm to 15 cm15–30 cm
  • Weight: 250–500 g
  • Battery: 5–15 min
  • Camera: 720p to 1080p
50–100 m
  • Recreational flying
  • Basic photography
  • Syma X20
  • JJRC H36
  • Cheerson CX-10
  • DelFly Micro
MiniMini-UAVs have dimensions ranging from 15 cm to 30 cm30–60 cm
  • Weight: 500–900 g
  • Battery: 20–30 min
  • Camera: 1080p to 4K
100–500 m
  • Aerial photography
  • Videography
  • Hobbyist flying
  • DJI Mini 3 Pro
  • Autel EVO Nano
  • Hubsan Zino Mini
  • WASP AE
MediumMedium UAVs have wingspans between 30 and 75 cm60–150 cm
  • Weight: 1–5 kg
  • Battery: 20–40 min
  • Camera: 4K, thermal imaging
500–3000 m
  • Professional photography
  • Inspection
  • Mapping
  • DJI Mavic 3
  • Yuneec Typhoon H Plus
  • Parrot Anafi USA
LargeLarge UAVs are designed for long-endurance flights for surveillance and targeted delivery >150 cm
  • Weight: >5 kg
  • Battery: 30–60 min
  • High-end sensors
  • Payloads
>3000 m
  • Industrial
  • Inspection
  • Agricultural
  • Mapping
  • Military applications
  • DJI Matrice 300 RTK
  • Skydio X2D
  • Walkera Vit Drone
  • Global Hawk
Table 20. Specifications of common market available UAVs.
Table 20. Specifications of common market available UAVs.
Ref.UAV ModelFeatures
[152]RoboBee X-Wing (Nano UAVs)
Jsan 14 00030 i001
  • Is 5 cm long and weighs 259 mg.
  • Limited altitude due to low altitudes due to its small size and power constraints.
  • Limited range, primarily for short-distance operations.
  • Flapping wings.
  • Powered by solar cells.
  • Extremely limited coverage.
  • Designed for indoor or very localized outdoor use.
[153]DELFLY (Mico UAVs)
Jsan 14 00030 i002
  • It is about 29 g and has 33 cm wingspan robot.
  • Can fly for over 5 min on a fully charged battery.
  • Has 14 cm wings.
  • Can reach a top speed of 7 m/s (25 km/h).
  • Powered by small rechargeable batteries.
  • Designed for indoor flight or short outdoor distances.
[154]WASP AE (Mini UAVs)
Jsan 14 00030 i003
  • Weight: Approximately 1.3 kg.
  • Endurance: Up to 50 min.
  • Range: Up to 5 km.
  • Length: 0.76 m.
  • Fixed wing with electric motor and pusher propeller.
  • Hand-launched in a confined area with remote launch capability.
  • Powered by a rechargeable battery.
  • Used for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).
[155]NASA SIERRA (Medium UAVS)
Jsan 14 00030 i004
  • Length of approximately 3.7 m.
  • Wingspan of about 6 m.
  • Can fly for 9.0 h (payload and weather dependent)
  • Max altitude: 3962.4 ft.
  • Range: 963 m.
  • Speed: 30.86.
  • Can carry up to 49.89 kg.
  • Used for atmospheric sampling, vegetation studies, geological surveys, and oceanographic research.
[156]Global Hawk (Larag UAVs)
Jsan 14 00030 i005
  • Wingspan: 35.4 m; take-off gross weight (max): 11,611.96 kg.
  • Payload: 680.38.
  • Range: 20,372 km.
  • Duration: 31 h (maximum).
  • True airspeed @ 1.6km altitude: 620 km/h airspeed.
  • DC (engine-driven generator): 28 VDC, hydraulic-powered generator.
  • Engine: Allison AE-3007H turbofan.
  • Applications: military, critical ISR support, disaster relief, and border surveillance.
[157]Parrot Disco
Jsan 14 00030 i006
  • Wingspan: 1.15 m; length: 0.58 m; height: 0.12 m; weight: 750 g.
  • Powered by lithium polymer battery (2700 mAh/25A 3-cell).
  • Maximum speed: 93 km/h.
  • Suitable to carry cellular UEs.
  • Fixed wing with a brushless motor and propeller for propulsion.
  • Up to 2 km range.
  • Used for aerial photography and videography.
[158]Kogan
Jsan 14 00030 i007
  • Its size varies by model, typically ranging from small palm-sized drones to larger models ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 m.
  • Weight: 0.16–1.2 kg.
  • Powered by rechargeable lithium polymer batteries 3.7 V/160 mAh.
  • Flight time: 11–13 min.
  • Used for aerial photography and videography.
[159]Scout B-330 Helicopter
Jsan 14 00030 i008
  • Weight: 85 kg
  • Payload capacity of up to 50 kg.
  • Typical mission scenario: at least three hours.
  • Multirotors (two rotors used).
  • Powered by gasoline.
  • Max. speed: 100 km/h.
  • Applications: surveillance, mapping, and surveying.
[160]MQ-9A “Reaper”
Jsan 14 00030 i009
  • Wingspan: 20m; length: 11m; Weight: 2223 kg.
  • Max payload capacity: internal: 386kg; external: 1361 kg.
  • Max endurance: 27h.
  • Fixed-wing.
  • Maximum altitude:15,240 m.
  • Maximum speed: 482 km/h.
  • Used for armed reconnaissance, airborne surveillance, and target acquisition.
[161]DJI Spreading Wings S900
Jsan 14 00030 i010
  • Diagonal wheelbase: 0.9 m; length: 0.358 m; width: 0.043 m; weight: 3.3 kg.
  • Can carry up to 5 kg, suitable for various camera and gimbal setups.
  • Electric (LiPo batteries).
  • Multirotors Hexacopter (six rotors).
  • Maximum speed: 57.6km/h.
  • Flight time varies based on payload, typically 15–18 min.
  • Suitable to carry cellular BSs or UEs.
Table 21. Common payload models of UAVs [162,163].
Table 21. Common payload models of UAVs [162,163].
Payload TypeFunctionalityApplications
Electro-optical (EO) camerasHigh-resolution visible light imaging
  • Aerial photography
  • Surveillance
  • Inspection
Multispectral camerasCapture images in specific wavelengths beyond human vision
  • Agriculture (monitoring crop health, identifying pests)
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Resource exploration
Thermal imaging
cameras
Capture heat signatures, useful in low-light conditions
  • Search and rescue
  • Infrastructure inspection
  • Wildlife monitoring
  • Nighttime security
Hyperspectral
cameras
Capture images in hundreds of wavelengths, providing very detailed spectral information
  • Precision agriculture
  • Mineral exploration
  • Pollution detection
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR)3D mapping, object detection
  • Precision mapping
  • Surveying
  • Construction planning
  • Stockpile measurement
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR)Creates high-resolution radar images, independent of weather conditions, penetrates clouds/smoke
  • Flood mapping
  • Ice monitoring
  • Disaster response
  • Military reconnaissance
Communication relaysExtend communication range
  • Disaster response
  • Remote area communication
  • Temporary comms networks
GNSS receiversPrecise positioning and timing
  • Surveying
  • Mapping
  • Navigation
Laser designatorsTarget marking
  • Military operations
  • Guided munitions
Radiofrequency (RF) sensorsMonitoring and analyzing radio frequencies
  • Communications
  • Signal intelligence
  • Spectrum management
Infrared sensorsDetecting infrared radiation
  • Heat mapping
  • Energy audits
  • Search and rescue
Atmospheric sensorsCollecting weather data
  • Meteorology
  • Climate research
  • Disaster response
Delivery containers and cargo hooksCarry and deliver goods autonomously
  • Package delivery
  • Construction
  • External load-carrying
Table 22. Main surveillance applications in different fields [131,167].
Table 22. Main surveillance applications in different fields [131,167].
FieldUAV Application
Traffic surveillanceCamera systems and sensors are deployed on roadways to regulate traffic flow, identify accidents, and enforce traffic laws.
Border patrolSurveillance technologies are utilized to oversee and secure national borders, identify unlawful crossings, and thwart smuggling operations.
Power grid inspectionSurveillance techniques, such as drones outfitted with cameras and thermal imaging, are utilized to examine power lines and substations, detect defects, and avert outages.
Construction
management
Surveillance via cameras and drones is employed to monitor construction sites, guaranteeing adherence to safety requirements, project schedules, and quality benchmarks.
Environmental
monitoring
Surveillance technologies are employed to assess environmental conditions, including air and water quality, deforestation, and wildlife movements, facilitating conservation initiatives and disaster response.
Table 23. Preliminary applications of THz in the 6G era [11,83,117,118,181].
Table 23. Preliminary applications of THz in the 6G era [11,83,117,118,181].
ApplicationDescriptionBenefits
Ultra-high-speed wireless data transferEnabling Tbps wireless communication for data-intensive applications.Unprecedented bandwidth for real-time streaming, AR/VR, and holographic communications.
Holographic communicationSupporting immersive 3D content and real-time holographic transmissions.Enhanced user experience for remote collaboration, telepresence, and entertainment.
High-resolution imaging and sensingEnabling THz radar and imaging systems for industrial, security, and healthcare applications.High-resolution imaging for non-invasive diagnostics, security scans, and environmental monitoring.
Wireless backhaulsProviding ultra-fast links for backhaul in dense urban and rural deployments.Cost-effective and high-capacity backhaul for 5G and 6G networks.
Terahertz IoTSupporting high-speed connectivity for IoT devices in smart environments.Seamless integration of massive IoT networks with low latency and high reliability.
Industrial automationEnabling THz connectivity for real-time control in Industry 4.0 settings.Enhanced operational efficiency and precision in automated manufacturing and robotics.
Satellite communicationsUtilizing THz frequencies for inter-satellite and satellite-to-ground links.High-speed and secure communication for space exploration and global connectivity.
Autonomous vehiclesSupporting high-speed V2X communication and advanced navigation systems.Improved safety and efficiency in autonomous driving and traffic management.
Biomedical applicationsNon-invasive diagnostics and imaging using THz frequencies.Accurate disease detection and imaging without harmful radiation.
Secure communicationLeveraging directional and low-interference THz links for secure data exchange.Reduced risk of eavesdropping and enhanced confidentiality in sensitive applications.
WLANsEnabling high-speed local connectivity for office and home networks.Faster data transfer for streaming, gaming, and remote work applications.
Environmental monitoringUsing THz sensing for real-time analysis of gases, pollutants, and aerosols.Improved accuracy in climate studies, pollution control, and disaster response.
Quantum communication supportEnhancing QC networks with THz links.High-speed and low-error transmission for quantum key distribution and computing.
Table 24. Path loss characteristics at different frequencies in the THz range.
Table 24. Path loss characteristics at different frequencies in the THz range.
Frequency (THz)Distance (m)Path Loss (dB)
0.1192.4
0.31101.6
0.51107.9
1.01114.8
1.010134.8
1.0100154.8
Table 25. Summary of recent studies on IRS and UAV as key enabling technologies of 6G.
Table 25. Summary of recent studies on IRS and UAV as key enabling technologies of 6G.
Ref.TopicIRS
Installation
Optimization
Variable
Optimization
Algorithms
Objectives
[187]IRS-assisted MEC-enabled UAV system in THz 6G networksBuildings
  • Phase shift
  • Computation resource allocation
  • THz sub-band allocation
  • Hungarian
  • whale optimization
Minimizing the
overall network
latency.
[188]Multi-IRS and multi-UAV-assisted MEC system for 5G/6G networksBuildings
  • Number of UAVs
  • Phase shift
  • Stop point (SP)
  • Association optimization among UEs
  • TPaPBA
  • Designing POP1, POP2, and POP3
  • DBC
  • Ignore redundant SPs
  • Greedy
Reduce the overall cost, including energy consumption, completion time, and maintenance cost of UAVs.
[176]FL network architecture via AirComp in IRS-assisted UAV communicationsUAVs
  • Transmission power
  • UAV trajectory
  • SCA
  • Iterative
Achieves high-quality and ubiquitous network coverage under data privacy and low latency requirements.
[189]Joint UAV trajectory, frequency association, and
power optimization
N/A
  • UAV trajectory
  • Frequency association
  • Transmission power
  • PPO
  • Alternating optimization
Minimize the sum delay in the terahertz band.
[190]THz-enabled UAVs to facilitate ubiquitous 6G mobile communication networksN/A
  • UAVs location
  • Transmit power
  • UAV trajectory
  • BKMC
  • SCA
  • PPO-DRL
Maximize overall throughput between the UAVs and the GU and minimize the transmitting power of the UAVs.
[191]IRS assisted UAV framework to provide stable communication services for high-speed trainsUAVs
  • UAV trajectory
  • IRS phase shift
Optimal strategy for UAV with IRSMaximize the minimum achievable data rates of HSTs.
[192]IRS phase shift design and UAV trajectory optimization of IRS-empowered UAV communication network.Buildings
  • IRS phase shift
  • Transmit power
  • Initial location and destination of the UAV
  • BCD
  • Prox-linear
  • IRM-based
  • Enhanced RL
Maximize the sum rate of all users and improve system gains.
[193]IRS-assisted secure UAV wireless networksBuildings
  • UAV trajectory
  • Transmit beamforming
  • Phase shift
IterativeTo guarantee secure communication between the UAV and the legitimate user.
[194]Joint optimization of aerial-IRS trajectory and passive beamforming via IRS phase shiftsUAVs
  • UAV trajectory
  • Passive beamforming through phase shift
DDPGMaximize the transmission rate and energy efficiency.
[195]An optimal trajectory for UAVs-IRS algorithm assisted THz wireless networkUAVs
  • UAVs-IRS trajectory
  • DQN
  • Heuristic
Minimize mission completion time for UAVs-IRS, maximize users’ average throughput data rate, and minimize total energy consumption under various practical constraints such as flying time, hovering time, and UAVs-IRS coverage area.
[196]Flying IRS algorithm named a (Fly-IRS) aided-THz wireless networkUAVs
  • IRS phase shift
  • UAV’s location
DDPGOptimize the system data rate and improve the system’s performance.
[197]FL in RIS-assisted UAV-enabled networksBuildings
  • UAV’s trajectory
  • FL aggregation weights
DDPGMaximizing the SNR.
[198]Integrating IRS and FL within dronesUAVs
  • UAVs trajectory
  • Data throughput
  • IRS phase
Processing flowchartOffering a compelling avenue for enhancing 6G communication network performance.
[199]A novel multi-IRS-aided multi-stream DM networkUAVs
  • Power on IRS (WMMSE-PC)
  • PSMs of all IRSs
  • MM
  • WMMSE-PC
Achieve a point-to-point multi-stream.
Table 26. Comparison of IRS phase control technologies.
Table 26. Comparison of IRS phase control technologies.
TechnologyPhase Control MethodAdvantagesChallenges
PIN diodesDiscrete phase tuning
  • Fast switching
  • Low cost
  • High power consumption
  • Limited resolution
Varactor diodesContinuous phase tuning
  • Fine control
  • Low power
  • Nonlinear response
  • Temperature sensitive
MEMS switchesDiscrete phase tuning
  • Low loss
  • Compact size
  • Slow switching speed
  • Complex fabrication
Liquid crystalContinuous phase tuning
  • High resolution
  • Low power
  • Slow response time
  • Temperature sensitive
Graphene-basedContinuous phase tuning
  • High-speed tuning
  • Compact design
  • Emerging technology
  • High fabrication cost
Table 27. Standardization efforts for 6G technologies.
Table 27. Standardization efforts for 6G technologies.
OrganizationKey Standardization Efforts
3GPP [206]
  • 6G architecture (Release 18 and beyond)
  • UAV-based networking
  • THz spectrum standardization
  • IRS deployment guidelines
ITU [207]
  • IMT-2030 framework
  • Spectrum allocation for THz
  • UAV-assisted networks
  • Network automation policies
ETSI [208]
  • Edge intelligence
  • AI-driven network management
  • IRS integration into Open RAN
IEEE
  • THz communication standards (IEEE 802.15.3d)
  • IRS-enabled smart environments
  • UAV connectivity protocols
Table 28. The 3GPP standardization roadmap for 6G [206].
Table 28. The 3GPP standardization roadmap for 6G [206].
ReleaseKey Features
Release 18 (2024–2025)AI-native 5G, UAV connectivity optimization, IRS-assisted wireless networks
Release 19 (2026–2027)THz spectrum utilization, massive MIMO for IRS, real-time UAV-assisted networking
Release 20 (2028–2030)Full 6G standardization, QC integration, holographic communications
Table 29. ITU announced key applications for THz bands.
Table 29. ITU announced key applications for THz bands.
Frequency BandBandwidthKey Applications
100 GHz–300 GHz200 GHzUltra-high-speed data links
300 GHz–1 THz700 GHzWireless backhaul, AI-driven connectivity
1 THz–10 THz9 THzHolographic and immersive communications
Table 30. ITU-R M.2412 deployment scenarios for THz communications.
Table 30. ITU-R M.2412 deployment scenarios for THz communications.
Deployment ScenarioDistanceApplication
Indoor wireless1–10 m
  • Wireless Terabit LANs
  • Holographic communications
Short-range outdoor10–100 m
  • 6G small cells
  • D2D
Backhaul links100–1000 m
  • Ultra-fast fiber replacement
Satellite communications>1 km
  • Space-based THz networking
Table 31. Potential spectrum-sharing challenges in different frequency ranges.
Table 31. Potential spectrum-sharing challenges in different frequency ranges.
Frequency RangeExisting Wireless TechnologiesPotential Interference Issues
100 GHz–275 GHz
  • Satellite links
  • Weather radar
  • Earth exploration satellites (EESS)
High-power radar emissions may cause interference with THz systems.
275 GHz–400 GHz
  • 6G backhaul
  • Fixed services
  • Scientific research
Spectrum congestion due to emerging THz backhaul applications.
400 GHz–1 THz
  • Deep-space communication
  • IoT
Cross-band interference from IoT devices operating in sub-THz bands.
1 THz–10 THz
  • Optical wireless communication
  • Ultrafast photonics
Optical-THz interference affecting ultra-high-speed data links.
Table 32. Service categories in network management [214,215,216].
Table 32. Service categories in network management [214,215,216].
Service CategoryDescriptionService ImplementationExisting SolutionsMain Use Case
Data collectionAggregates data from various network elements and services for analysis and decision-making.Telemetry agents, sensors
  • Prometheus
  • OpenTelemetry
Network monitoring
AnalyticsProcesses collected data to generate insights, detect anomalies, and predict future network behavior.AI/ML models, big data analytics
  • Splunk
  • IBM Watson
Predictive maintenance
Policy managementDefines and manages policies that govern network behavior.Policy engines, intent-based networking
  • ONAP
  • Cisco DNA
Automated network configuration
Decision-makingUtilizes analytics and policies for network decisions.AI inference engines
  • Juniper AI-driven networks
Fault detection
ExecutionImplements network configuration and optimization.SDN controllers
  • Open Daylight
  • ONOS
Dynamic resource allocation
AssuranceMonitors performance and ensures SLAs.SLA monitoring tools
  • ServiceNow
  • Zabbix
Service quality enforcement
Security managementProtects network integrity and data.AI-based threat detection
  • Palo Alto Cortex
  • Fortinet AI
Cybersecurity enforcement
Resource orchestrationManages resource allocation.NFV, cloud orchestrators
  • Kubernetes
  • OpenStack
Dynamic service scaling
Service orchestrationManages end-to-end service deployment.Cross-domain orchestrators
  • ETSI OSM
  • Akraino
5G and 6G service rollout
Catalog managementMaintains service inventories.Service catalog platforms
  • TM Forum APIs
Standardized service provisioning
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Othman, W.M.; Ateya, A.A.; Nasr, M.E.; Muthanna, A.; ElAffendi, M.; Koucheryavy, A.; Hamdi, A.A. Key Enabling Technologies for 6G: The Role of UAVs, Terahertz Communication, and Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces in Shaping the Future of Wireless Networks. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2025, 14, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020030

AMA Style

Othman WM, Ateya AA, Nasr ME, Muthanna A, ElAffendi M, Koucheryavy A, Hamdi AA. Key Enabling Technologies for 6G: The Role of UAVs, Terahertz Communication, and Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces in Shaping the Future of Wireless Networks. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks. 2025; 14(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Othman, Wagdy M., Abdelhamied A. Ateya, Mohamed E. Nasr, Ammar Muthanna, Mohammed ElAffendi, Andrey Koucheryavy, and Azhar A. Hamdi. 2025. "Key Enabling Technologies for 6G: The Role of UAVs, Terahertz Communication, and Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces in Shaping the Future of Wireless Networks" Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 14, no. 2: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020030

APA Style

Othman, W. M., Ateya, A. A., Nasr, M. E., Muthanna, A., ElAffendi, M., Koucheryavy, A., & Hamdi, A. A. (2025). Key Enabling Technologies for 6G: The Role of UAVs, Terahertz Communication, and Intelligent Reconfigurable Surfaces in Shaping the Future of Wireless Networks. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop