Use of Face-to-Face Assessment Methods in E-Learning—An Example of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Test
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Context
2.2. Organization of the OSCE Tests
2.3. Study Sample and Design
2.4. Study Instrument
2.5. Data Collection
2.6. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Results of the OSCE Tests
3.2. Students’ Feedback on the Provision of OSCE Tests
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bruno, A.; Bates, I.; Brock, T.; Anderson, C. Towards a global competency framework. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2010, 74, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Koster, A.; Schalekamp, T.; Meijerman, I. Implementation of Competency-Based Pharmacy Education (CBPE). Pharmacy 2017, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visacri, M.B.; Figueiredo, I.V.; Lima, T.M. Role of pharmacist during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2021, 17, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pharmaceutical Group of European Union. Pharmacy 2030: A Vision for Community Pharmacy in Europe. Available online: https://www.pgeu.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Pharmacy-2030_-A-Vision-for-Community-Pharmacy-in-Europe.pdf (accessed on 8 July 2021).
- International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). Patient safety. In Pharmacists’ Role in Medication without Harm; International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP): Hague, The Netherlands, 2020; Available online: https://www.fip.org/file/4757 (accessed on 8 July 2021).
- Shirwaikar, A. Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmacy education—A trend. Pharm. Pract. 2015, 13, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kristina, S.A.; Wijoyo, Y. Assessment of pharmacy students’ clinical skills using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): A literature review. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2019, 10, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urteaga, E.M.; Attridge, R.L.; Tovar, J.M.; Witte, A.P. Evaluation of Clinical and Communication Skills of Pharmacy Students and Pharmacists with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2015, 79, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbo, M.; Patel, J.P.; Tawab, R.; Davies, J.G. Evaluating clinical skills of undergraduate pharmacy students using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Pharm. Educ. 2006, 6, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Obaidi, Z.M.J.; Bader, Q.A.; Hussain, Y.A.; Al-Rekabi, M.D.; Abbas, H.K.; Shaheed, D.Q. The Impact of E-Learning on Pharmacy Education: Pharmacy Students’ Perspective during COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur. J. Mol. Clin. Med. 2020, 7, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, A.; Carson, A.; Reid, K.; Smallwood, D.; Judd, T. Fully online OSCEs: A large cohort case study. MedEdPublish 2020, 9, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). FIP Digital Health in Pharmacy Education; International Pharmaceutical Federation: Hague, The Netherlands, 2021; Available online: https://www.fip.org/file/4958 (accessed on 9 July 2021).
- Volmer, D.; Sepp, K.; Raal, A. Students’ Feedback on the Development of a Competency-Based Pharmacy Education (CBPE) at the University of Tartu, Estonia. Pharmacy 2021, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdi, A.M.; Mestrovic, A.; Gelisen, I.; Gultekin, O.; Yavuz, D.O.; Saygı, S.; Al-Baghdadi, H.; Demirdamar, R.; Basgutal, B. Introducing a performance-based objective clinical examination into the pharmacy curriculum for students of Northern Cyprus. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 16, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vihma, P. COVID-19 Is Likely to Change the Future of Learning. In Estonia, This Is Old News. E-Estonia. 2020. Available online: https://e-estonia.com/covid-19-is-likely-to-change-the-future-of-learning-in-estonia-this-is-old-news/ (accessed on 19 July 2021).
- Thomas, D.; Beshir, S.A.; Zachariah, S.; Sundararaj, K.G.; Hamdy, H. Distance assessment of counselling skills using virtual patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharm. Educ. 2020, 20, 196–204. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, D. Confronting the Challenges of Therapy Online: A Pilot Project. 2010. Available online: http://www.therapyonline.ca/files/Confronting_the_challenges.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021).
- OECD. Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. In OECD Health Policy Studies; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sepp, K.; Lubi, K.; Rass, H.; Volmer, D. Provision of community pharmacy services during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Estonia—Experiences and future implications. In Proceedings of the 8th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference, Riga, Latvia, 22–26 March 2021. Web of Conferences, Society, Health, Welfare, under review. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Eijk, M.; Faber, M.J.; Aarts, J.W.; Kremer, J.A.; Munneke, M.; Bloem, B.R. Using Online Health Communities to Deliver Patient-Centered Care to People With Chronic Conditions. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013, 15, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sepp, K.; Cavaco, A.M.; Raal, A.; Volmer, D. Profession Driven Improvement of the Quality of Pharmacy Practice—Implementation of Community Pharmacy Services Quality Guidelines in Estonia. Healthcare 2021, 9, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volmer, D.; Sepp, K.; Raal, A.; Atkinson, J. Pharmacy Practice and Education in Estonia. Pharmacy 2019, 7, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nash, R.; Thompson, W.; Stupans, I.; Lau, E.T.L.; Santos, J.M.S.; Brown, N.; Nissen, L.M.; Chalmers, L. CPD Aligned to Competency Standards to Support Quality Practice. Pharmacy 2017, 25, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khamis, S.; Abdi, A.M.; Basgut, B. Preparing lifelong learners for delivering pharmaceutical care in an ever-changing world: A study of pharmacy students. BMC. Med. Educ. 2020, 10, 502. [Google Scholar]
- Muldoon, K.; Biesty, L.; Smith, V. ‘I found the OSCE very stressful’: Student midwives’ attitudes towards an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Nurse Educ. Today 2014, 34, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojarrab, S.; Bazrafkan, L.; Jaberi, A. The effect of a stress and anxiety coping program on objective structured clinical examination performance among nursing students in shiraz, Iran. BMC Med. Educ. 2020, 20, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunne, K.; Moffett, J.; Loughran, S.T.; Duggan, V.; Campion, D.P. Evaluation of a coaching workshop for the management of veterinary nursing students’ OSCE-associated test anxiety. Ir. Vet. J. 2018, 71, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Year | 2018 (4th Year Students) | 2019 (4th Year Students) | 2019 (Assistant Pharmacists) | 2021 (4th Year Students) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of participants (n) | 12 | 15 | 23 | 28 |
Setting | Auditorium | Auditorium | Auditorium | Zoom |
2018 Mean (0–3; 0–2) ± Std | 2019 Mean (0–3; 0–2) ± Std | 2019_AP Mean (0–3; 0–2) ± Std | 2021 Mean (0–3; 0–2) ± Std | Total Mean (0–3; 0–2) ± Std | One-Way ANOVA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creating a contact/ending a contact | 2.50 | 2.93 | 2.04 | 2.50 | 2.45 | F(3, 74) = 7.65, p ≤ 0.001 |
± 0.67 | ± 0.26 | ± 0.71 | ± 0.51 | ± 0.64 | ||
Evaluating symptoms | 2.17 | 2.40 | 2.09 | 2.43 | 2.28 | F(3, 74) = 1.52, p = 0.217 |
± 0.58 | ± 0.63 | ± 0.67 | ± 0.63 | ± 0.64 | ||
Evaluating concomitant illnesses, medicines in use | 2.17 | 2.47 | 2.26 | 1.75 | 2.10 | F(3, 74) = 2.46, p = 0.069 |
± 0.83 | ± 0.64 | ± 0.92 | ± 1.04 | ± 0.93 | ||
Recommending medicines or treatment | 2.25 | 2.33 | 2.65 | 1.82 | 2.23 | F(3, 74) = 8.19, p ≤ 0.001 |
± 0.62 | ± 0.62 | ± 0.49 | ± 0.67 | ± 0.68 | ||
Giving drug information | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.39 | 2.25 | 2.13 | F(3, 74) = 3.47, p = 0.020 |
± 1.17 | ± 1.0 | ± 0.58 | ± 0.70 | ± 0.86 | ||
Using appropriate language to the patient | 2.25 | 2.67 | 2.83 | 2.75 | 2.68 | F(3, 74)= 3.88, p = 0.012 |
± 0.62 | ± 0.49 | ± 0.39 | ± 0.52 | ± 0.52 | ||
Counseling health/ well-being issues | 1.58 | 2.13 | 1.13 | 2.43 | 1.86 | F(3, 74) = 7.37, p ≤ 0.001 |
± 1.24 | ± 0.99 | ± 1.01 | ± 0.96 | ± 1.15 | ||
Patient’s feedback | 1.75 | 1.87 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.69 | F(3, 74) = 0.87, p ≤ 0.461 |
± 0.62 | ± 035 | ± 0.56 | ± 0.69 | ± 0.59 |
2018 Mean (0–2; 0–4) ± Std | 2019 Mean (0–2; 0–4) ± Std | 2019_AP Mean (0–2; 0–4) ± Std | 2021 (Zoom) Mean (0–2; 0–4) ± Std | Total Mean (0–2; 0–4) ± Std | One-Way ANOVA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The OSCE test enabled us to use clinical knowledge and communication skills | 1.83 ± 0.38 | 1.91 ± 0.30 | 1.90 ± 0.30 | 1.80 ± 0.41 | 1.85 ± 0.36 | F(3, 71) = 0.43, p = 0.731 |
The time to solve the OSCE test cases was sufficient | 1.11 ± 0.74 | 1.82 ± 0.41 | 1.25 ± 0.91 | 1.58 ± 0.65 | 1.41 ± 0.76 | F(3, 70) = 3.04, p= 0.034 |
The test was well conducted and ran smoothly | 1.88 ± 0.33 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.86 ± 0.36 | 1.96 ± 0.20 | 1.92 ± 0.28 | F(3, 70) = 0.96, p = 0.418 |
Sufficient information was provided prior to the test | 1.95 ± 0.23 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.99 ± 0.12 | F(3, 71) = 0.98, p = 0.406 |
All assessed knowledge was previously taught | 1.84 ± 0.50 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 1.76 ± 0.44 | 1.87 ± 0.38 | F(3, 73) = 1.60, p = 0.197 |
The OSCE made it possible to learn through real-life situations | 1.89 ± 0.32 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.71 ± 0.56 | 1.76 ± 0.60 | 1.82 ± 0.48 | F(3, 72) = 1.13, p = 0.341 |
The OSCE caused less stress than other exams | 1.20 ± 0.77 | 1.31 ± 0.86 | 0.68 ± 0.78 | 1.00 ± 0.83 | 1.01 ± 0.82 | F(3, 75) = 2.18, p = 0.098 |
The OSCE test highlighted gaps in knowledge and communication skills | 1.72 ± 0.46 | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.65 ± 0.59 | 1.75 ± 0.53 | 1.75 ± 0.49 | F(3, 69) = 1.24, p = 0.301 |
Overall assessment of the OSCE test | 3.19 ± 0.81 | 3.62 ± 0.51 | 3.22 ± 0.60 | 3.16 ± 0.69 | 3.26 ± 0.68 | F(3, 78) = 1.49, p = 0.225 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sepp, K.; Volmer, D. Use of Face-to-Face Assessment Methods in E-Learning—An Example of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Test. Pharmacy 2021, 9, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9030144
Sepp K, Volmer D. Use of Face-to-Face Assessment Methods in E-Learning—An Example of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Test. Pharmacy. 2021; 9(3):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9030144
Chicago/Turabian StyleSepp, Kristiina, and Daisy Volmer. 2021. "Use of Face-to-Face Assessment Methods in E-Learning—An Example of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Test" Pharmacy 9, no. 3: 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9030144
APA StyleSepp, K., & Volmer, D. (2021). Use of Face-to-Face Assessment Methods in E-Learning—An Example of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Test. Pharmacy, 9(3), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9030144