2. Schematic of the System and Initial Setup
When comparing the configuration with a generator integrated into the nacelle to the variant employing a hydrostatic transmission, the latter offers a significant advantage: it allows for the use of a compact nacelle. In this setup, the nacelle only needs to house the rotor and the mechanical components required to transmit motion to a hydraulic pump. Additionally, an electric motor can be incorporated into the system to compensate for potential fluctuations in rotational speed. This motor, however, does not necessarily need to be mounted in the nacelle—it can instead be positioned alongside the hydraulic motor at ground level.
This approach enables the development of small-scale wind turbines and provides flexibility in utilizing the generated energy in alternative forms—for example, conversion to heat using hydraulic resistors, or powering mechanical actuators.
The project involves the implementation of a controller for managing the wind energy capture system, with a focus on accurately regulating the oil flow through the hydrostatic transmission. The proposed system will be responsible for monitoring and compensating for variations in both rotational speed and, consequently, flow rate with the purpose of accurately simulating the behavior of the setup in real-life wind conditions. This is achieved via closed-loop control of an electric motor integrated into the described setup.
The controller will systematically collect, record, and process a comprehensive range of data, including, but not limited to, flow rate, fluid pressure, and temperature metrics, as well as the angular velocity of the oil pump shaft and a variety of additional system-specific operational parameters. Through continuous monitoring and real-time analysis of these variables, the system aims to optimize overall energy efficiency, minimize resource wastage, and extend component lifespan. Simultaneously, the controller will enable dynamic adaptation of system performance in response to fluctuating environmental conditions, such as ambient temperature and humidity, as well as variations in consumer demand patterns, operational loads, and system stressors. This adaptive functionality is critical for maintaining optimal system stability, responsiveness, and reliability under a wide range of operational scenarios.
A schematic representation of the proposed system is shown in
Figure 1. As can be observed, while the classic version used a generator (GEN) in the nacelle of the turbine, the version proposed here for simulation uses a hydraulic pump (HP) alongside a hydraulic motor (HM). The oil flow generated by the said pump is transferred to either an electric generator or a heat exchanger at the bottom of the system. This greatly reduces the weight of the nacelle and allows for smaller, more flexible and efficient systems to be used, with the downside of a more complicated electronic control system. The system is controlled by an electronic control system (ECS).
The hydraulic system under investigation, as detailed in this study, is fundamentally centered around a compact hydraulic pump. This pump features a nominal internal displacement volume of 9 cubic centimeters and is mechanically coupled to an alternating current (AC) electric motor with a rated power output of 2.2 kW. This configuration is further augmented by the integration of a frequency converter, which enables fine-grained control over the rotational speed and acceleration profile of the motor shaft. Consequently, this setup facilitates the reproduction of user-defined dynamic load conditions and temporal power profiles. The ability to apply such customized speed and torque inputs to the hydraulic pump eliminates the requirement for a conventional multiplier gearbox, which would typically be necessary when interfacing with actual wind turbine hardware in an operational setting.
This design flexibility is of particular importance for simulating variable wind conditions, as it permits the emulation of transient aerodynamic loads and fluctuating torque profiles consistent with those experienced in real-world wind energy applications. As a result, the experimental apparatus is capable of reproducing realistic boundary conditions and enables a more accurate and representative evaluation of the system’s thermal, mechanical, and fluid dynamic behavior under operationally relevant scenarios.
The system functions by converting mechanical energy from the electric motor into hydraulic energy via the pump, thereby generating pressurized flow. This pressurized hydraulic fluid is then routed through a series of adjustable and actively controlled flow restriction elements. These components are strategically positioned to introduce hydraulic resistance, which results in internal energy losses, primarily in the form of heat, due to viscous friction within the working fluid—typically a mineral oil. The heat generated by these frictional losses is subsequently extracted and transferred to downstream subsystems, where it may be harnessed for secondary applications such as space heating, fluid preheating, or thermal energy storage. In addition, due to the precise speed control allowed by the frequency converter, almost any speed and acceleration profile can be implemented, thus allowing realistic speed profiles to be tested.
To achieve this, a simplified yet functionally representative hydraulic circuit was conceptualized, constructed, and implemented, as illustrated schematically in
Figure 2. The core components of the circuit include the AC motor, designated as M, which delivers mechanical drive to the hydraulic pump labeled P. The pump draws hydraulic fluid from a reservoir or tank, denoted as T. The pressurized fluid is directed either back into the reservoir or toward the system’s load circuit, depending on the operational state of a directional control valve, identified as DH. When DH is de-energized, fluid is bypassed to the tank. When energized, fluid flows into the main hydraulic path.
Downstream of the DH valve, the system is instrumented with a pressure transducer (Tp) and a flow rate sensor (Tq), which continuously monitor the real-time hydraulic parameters. These measurements are crucial for characterizing the performance of the system and validating simulation models. Additionally, a safety relief valve, labeled Ssig, is incorporated into the circuit to provide overpressure protection. This valve is factory-calibrated to open at a pressure slightly above the system’s nominal operating range, thereby mitigating the risk of structural damage or component failure due to hydraulic overloading.
Thermal energy generation within the circuit is achieved through the use of one or more precision throttle valves, consolidated into a single representative component labeled RH in
Figure 2. These valves impose controlled restrictions on the fluid flow, thus generating internal turbulence and viscous dissipation, which are the primary sources of heat generation within the working medium. The heated hydraulic fluid is subsequently delivered to a thermal load or consumer component, designated as C, which absorbs the thermal energy before returning the now-cooled fluid to the system’s reservoir. This closed-loop configuration allows for continuous fluid recirculation and stable thermal operation over extended periods of testing.
Motor control is achieved using a Nidec frequency converter, which operates via Modbus communication and utilizes Rotor Flux Control-Asynchronous (RFC-A) for precise speed regulation. Fluid pressure and flow are measured immediately downstream of the directional control (way) valve. Temperature is monitored at multiple points within the hydraulic circuit, including the tank, the directional valve, the pump, and the throttle valve. Due to the variety of sensor signal types—analog voltage for temperature, pulse counting for flow, and analog current for pressure—multiple microcontrollers are employed to acquire data from the sensors. These microcontrollers transmit the collected data to a central single-board computer (SBC) for processing.
A redundant control mechanism is implemented by routing the enable signal for the frequency converter through an independent Ethernet-based communication channel managed at the SBC level. This allows for an automatic shutdown of the pump if communication via Modbus to the remote user is lost or if critical system parameters (flow, temperature, pressure) exceed predefined thresholds. These were set at 70 °C for the hydraulic oil, 55 bar pressure, as well as 15 L per minute. The general schematic of the system control is presented in
Figure 3. Green arrows represent data signals, while red and blue arrows represent pressure and flow information. Arrow directions show if communication is either unidirectional or bidirectional.
Following the initial system dimensioning and design phase, the physical assembly of the components was carried out. The completed assembly is depicted in
Figure 4, which provides a comprehensive overview of the entire system configuration. The labeled components include the directional control valve and pressure sensor (1), the flow sensor (2), the tank (3), and the throttle valve (4). The motor (11) and the pump (10) are regulated by a frequency controller (5) and the control circuit (8), both of which are powered by an AC-to-DC power supply (7). Additionally, a webcam (9) is integrated into the system to enable remote monitoring. Where needed, fused deposition modeling was used to create supports for the equipment used, using settings as specified in [
33].
The control architecture of the test system was developed using a combination of the Python and C++ programming languages. This dual-language approach was selected to balance ease of development with performance efficiency, particularly in handling real-time data acquisition and control tasks. In addition, a custom-designed graphical user interface (GUI), implemented entirely in Python 3.13.4, was created to provide intuitive interaction with system parameters and real-time monitoring capabilities.
Due to the inherent complexity and concurrency requirements of the test stand—particularly with regard to synchronizing sensor input, motor control, and data logging operations—a multi-threaded programming model was adopted. This approach enabled parallel execution of critical tasks, ensuring responsive system behavior and stable performance under varying operational loads. The overall software structure and thread management strategy are illustrated schematically in
Figure 5.
Special attention was given to ensuring that control of the system is redundant, as it is critical for ensuring operational reliability, safety, and system integrity, particularly in mission-critical applications. By incorporating parallel control pathways and backup components, redundancy mitigates the risk of failure due to single-point malfunctions, hardware degradation, or unexpected environmental disturbances. It enables continuous functionality during component faults, thus preventing catastrophic system collapse.
The system is also equipped with a dedicated dashboard interface, specifically developed to facilitate comprehensive control and real-time monitoring of the test stand. This dashboard serves as the central point of interaction for the operator, offering a range of functional controls and live feedback mechanisms essential for precise system operation.
Key features of the dashboard include adjustable controls for setting motor speed, as well as interfaces for establishing and managing communication protocols such as TCP/IP and Modbus. In addition to direct control elements, the interface provides both live and calculated data outputs, enabling continuous observation of system performance.
A designated charting area is integrated within the dashboard (
Figure 6), allowing for real-time graphical representation of key parameters over the course of testing. Moreover, a schematic diagram of the control system is embedded in the interface, supplemented by critical operational data such as current temperature readings, system pressure, and oil flow rates. This integrated design ensures that all relevant information is readily accessible, promoting efficient operation and rapid response to any deviations during testing.
Since the system operates within a networked environment, significant attention must be dedicated to addressing cybersecurity concerns, including data integrity, unauthorized access prevention, and system resilience against cyber threats. Nevertheless, under the specific conditions of the present study, which was conducted in a controlled laboratory testing environment, cybersecurity was not prioritized. Consequently, minimal-to-no formal security measures were implemented during this phase of development. However, recognizing the critical importance of secure operation in broader, real-world applications, further steps will be undertaken. Future work will involve the integration of comprehensive cybersecurity protocols to ensure safe, reliable usability within larger, interconnected network infrastructures.
3. Startup Parameters and Testing
After initial functionality tests of the installation, hydraulic oil was added, and a pressure of 10 bar was generated in the system by using the throttle valve. With the aid of a thermal camera, FLIR E54 24° produced by the company Teledyne FLIR LLC in Estonia, city of Tallinn, we could already observe a small temperature increase of approximately 10 °C over a period of 30 min. This result can be observed in
Figure 7 and
Figure 8, as captured using a thermal camera. Belco ISO VG 46 oil was used. The oil was provided by the company branch office, the city of Suceava, Romania. It has a kinematic viscosity of 41.4–50.6 cSt at 40 °C, per ISO 3448. Its viscosity index typically ranges from 95 to 105 for mineral oils and higher (120+) for synthetics, ensuring stable viscosity across temperatures. The flash point is generally above 200 °C, and the pour point ranges from −30 °C to −40 °C. Regarding the sensors used, for pressure, a QDW90A sensor produced by Anhui Qidian Automation Technology Co., Ltd., located in the city of Huaibei, China was used. It is a high-precision stainless steel pressure sensor designed for industrial applications. It offers customizable output signals (4–20 mA, 0–10 V, RS485), measures pressures from −0.1 MPa to 60 MPa, and operates in temperatures from −20 °C to 400 °C. The GTLWGY turbine flow meter produced by Anhui Jujie Automation Technology Co., Ltd., located in the city of Wuhu, China, is a precision instrument used to measure liquid flow rates. It operates by detecting the rotational speed of a turbine within the flow stream. Working parameters include flow ranges from 0.1 to 2000 m
3/h, pressure up to 25 MPa, and temperatures from −20 °C to 120 °C.
Other relevant parameters are 1000 rotations per minute for the pump and a measured flow of approximately 4.7 L/minute for the initial testing of the hydraulic circuit.
Following this stage, a number of tests were performed, at different motor speeds and different pressures set by means of the throttle and safety valve. The attempts performed by the authors are presented in
Table 1, with the results represented graphically in
Figure 9,
Figure 10,
Figure 11,
Figure 12,
Figure 13 and
Figure 14. Since all the values in attempt number 1 were constant, except for RPM, there was no need to plot the information. During this attempt, no temperature difference was visible in the system.
Regarding the other attempts, they are shown in
Figure 9,
Figure 10,
Figure 11,
Figure 12,
Figure 13 and
Figure 14 and are discussed in the following part of the paper. All of the attempts were performed over the same period of time—30 min—allowing for the values to be easily compared.
Firstly, an attempt was made at the pump’s lowest speed of 500 rotations per minute, as prescribed by the manufacturer, at an initial set pressure of 10 bar.
As previously stated, the desired system pressure was achieved by sequentially opening the way valve and manually adjusting the flow restriction using the throttle valve, progressively lowering the cross-sectional area available for fluid passage until the target pressure value was reached. During this procedure, a steady and measured oil flow rate of approximately 4.5 L per minute was obtained under stabilized conditions. This process and its associated outcomes are graphically represented and documented in
Figure 9.
With respect to the data presented in
Figure 9,
Figure 10,
Figure 11,
Figure 12,
Figure 13 and
Figure 14, it is important to note that an initial overshoot in the measured pressure values occurs consistently. This phenomenon is primarily attributed to the manual nature of the pressure setting at system startup, where fluctuations are unavoidable. Additionally, although the raw data signals acquired from the various pressure and flow sensors within the hydraulic circuit undergo real-time digital filtering to reduce high-frequency disturbances, a certain degree of residual noise remains present. This inherent measurement noise can be observed in the graphical charts.
As depicted in the image, a temperature rise of approximately 8 °C was recorded over the 30 min period. In addition, as expected, due to lower viscosity at higher temperatures, an increase in flow and a decrease in pressure could be observed. Following startup, no modifications were made to the surface area of the throttle valve or to the motor speed.
Following the completion of the initial low-speed trial, the motor speed was increased to 1500 rotations per minute in order to examine the system’s behavior under conditions of higher dynamic input. The results are shown in
Figure 10. This adjustment had an immediate and measurable impact on the volumetric flow rate of the hydraulic oil, which increased to approximately 6 L per minute. For this second test, the system pressure was again set to 10 bar, achieved through manual adjustment of the throttle valve to restrict flow and elevate pressure to the desired value.
Over the course of a 30 min operating period, the system exhibited a noticeable thermal response, with the temperature of the working fluid rising by approximately 15 °C. In addition to the thermal effects, a smaller reduction in system pressure was observed relative to earlier tests, accompanied by a modest decrease in the oil flow rate toward the end of the interval. This specific behavior—characterized by elevated temperature, slightly diminished flow, and reduced pressure—was found to occur predominantly under conditions of low pressure (10 bar) in combination with high pump speed (1500 RPM). The observed performance was attributed to intrinsic operational characteristics of the pump, such as internal leakage, efficiency limitations, or temperature-dependent viscosity effects at elevated speeds, which become especially relevant when examining the system’s behavior at different pressure levels with a fixed throttle valve as the only load. At 10 bar, the system operates stably even as oil temperature rises, because the flow demand through the throttle is relatively low and the pump’s internal leakage remains within manageable limits. Although viscosity decreases with rising temperature—slightly increasing the internal slip—the gear pump can still easily maintain the required flow and pressure. This pressure stability is further supported by the fact that flow through a fixed orifice depends on the square root of the pressure drop, allowing the pump to supply sufficient flow to meet demand despite temperature-related changes.
Additional experimental testing procedures were systematically carried out at an intermediate pressure level of 20 bar to further investigate the system’s performance characteristics. Testing was conducted under two distinct operational conditions: first, at the minimum specified pump rotational speed of 500 rotations per minute (RPM), and second, at the maximum operational speed of 1500 RPM. The primary objective of these tests was to thoroughly evaluate and characterize both the thermal response and flow behavior of the hydraulic system while operating at this mid-range pressure setting. Particular attention was given to identifying any nonlinearities, transitional flow phenomena, or thermal instabilities arising under different dynamic load conditions.
The results obtained from both trials (
Figure 11 and
Figure 12) demonstrated qualitatively similar trends in system behavior. In each case, the thermal response over the 30 min testing period showed only marginal variation when compared to prior results at lower or higher pressures. Notably, a slight increase in oil temperature was recorded, suggesting a modest enhancement in heat generation and retention. However, this improvement was relatively minor and did not represent a significant departure from the general pattern observed across other tested conditions.
Finally, a series of tests was carried out at a significantly higher initial pressure setting of 50 bar, under two distinct operating conditions corresponding to pump speeds of 500 and 1500 rotations per minute. The results are shown in
Figure 13 and
Figure 14. Under these conditions, a substantially greater thermal gradient was recorded when compared to previous trials. Specifically, at the lower pump speed of 500 RPM, the working fluid exhibited a temperature increase of approximately 15 °C over the standard test duration of 30 min. In contrast, at the higher speed of 1500 RPM, the temperature rise was markedly more pronounced, reaching approximately 43 °C within the same timeframe.
Despite the difference in rotational speed and the resulting thermal behavior, the volumetric flow rate of the hydraulic oil remained relatively consistent with earlier observations. At 500 RPM, the flow rate was measured at approximately 3 L per minute, while at 1500 RPM, it reached ca. 6 L per minute. These results indicate that while flow rates scale predictably with pump speed, the associated thermal effects become significantly more pronounced at elevated pressures and higher operational intensities.
4. Conclusions and Further Work
This paper outlines the design, implementation, and testing of a mechatronic test stand that converts historical wind power data into thermal energy for small-to-medium-sized consumers. It targets applications in densely populated areas, where installing large wind turbines is impractical due to space constraints. The system employs a 2.2 kW AC motor with rotor flux control (RFC) to simulate a wind turbine driving a 6 cm3 hydraulic pump, enabling a compact and lightweight installation. If needed, however, the system can easily be modified to accommodate larger motors and/or pumps. The paper details the system’s schematic, setup, operation, and initial results obtained with the custom-built hydraulic test stand. Future work will focus on analyzing the impact of varying wind patterns and exploring specific use cases for the system.
The paper details the series of steps undertaken to design, construct, and implement a dedicated test stand, specifically intended to simulate wind energy conditions and determine the key parameters required for the effective generation of thermal energy. In this setup, the behavior of wind energy is replicated through the controlled operation of an electric motor, allowing for a systematic investigation into the conversion of mechanical input into usable thermal output under various simulated environmental conditions. The system does not, however, take into account any real-life deployment conditions beyond implementing specific wind speed profiles. Steps are currently being taken to allow the oil to be cooled or heated below or above room temperature, and longer oil pathways are being discussed, as well as including safety precautions into the system.
In the following works, the issue of regulating and ensuring an optimal temperature for the hydraulic fluid will also be addressed. A series of accumulators might be introduced into the hydraulic circuit to store the excess flow generated by higher wind speeds. The fluid will be released from these accumulators when the wind speed drops below the chosen nominal value of 10 m/s. For this system, a lower nominal wind speed than the standard was selected, in accordance with the geographical location from which the wind speed variation data were collected. Generally, in classic and commercial systems, the nominal wind speed is around 15 m/s.
In addition to using accumulators, the replacement of pressure regulation and control equipment with proportional ones will be considered. These allow dynamic adjustment of the system parameters in order to achieve a minimally acceptable oil temperature, ensuring efficient heat transfer to the second working medium. Specifically, in cases where the wind speed falls below 6 m/s, the accumulator will release part of the stored energy. Simultaneously, this energy will be injected into the circuit, and the proportional equipment will adjust the flow rate based on a predefined rule to determine the minimum acceptable temperature.
A second operating scenario would involve recovering hydraulic energy that is otherwise lost when the system’s imposed conditions are exceeded—that is, when the flow exceeds the maximum allowed to maintain a fluid temperature of 60 °C. This energy will be recovered using a three-way flow regulator that redirects the excess fluid to an auxiliary energy generation system. This system consists of a hydraulic motor, an electric generator, and power electronics.
In this scenario, two particular cases might be considered. The first case involves compensating for the thermal energy by using heating elements along the hydraulic line leading to the heat exchanger. This way, the oil is heated to the required temperature, and the hydraulic circuit is not affected by this artificial temperature increase. The power supply for the heating elements will be provided by the auxiliary system. Practically, the electrical energy stored in batteries will be used to power these elements. Thus, the energy from the batteries will be consumed, allowing them to store energy again from the auxiliary system. The second case considered involves using the electrical energy generated from recovering the excess flow to heat a supplementary system installed in the water hydraulic circuit, to heat the water when heat exchange cannot be efficiently achieved.
Following the initial testing phase of the system, the results confirmed the anticipated outcome: the hydraulic oil effectively facilitated the conversion of mechanical energy, supplied by the electric motor, into thermal energy. This conversion process validated the fundamental thermodynamic principles underpinning the system’s design. Subsequent research efforts will focus on the integration of realistic wind speed profiles and corresponding power outputs, emulating the dynamic behavior of the motor shaft under variable operational conditions. Furthermore, the thermal energy generated will be transferred to secondary systems, such as underfloor heating installations or other non-critical energy consumers, which could benefit from this method of energy repurposing. The objective is to enhance the overall efficiency and utility of the system by capturing otherwise wasted mechanical energy and redirecting it toward sustainable and practical applications. A schematic of a possible setup of such a system is shown in
Figure 15. Further work will also be undertaken to improve or simulate certain scenarios regarding the type of turbine used, relying on work performed by other scientists [
34]. In addition, research is currently being conducted to allow for thermal storage for mid-to-long term use of the energy generated. Furthermore, the system might stand to benefit from using proportional throttle valves, allowing for wind speed compensation for more complex scenarios.