Next Article in Journal
Accelerated Growth of Peer-to-Peer Lending and Its Impact on the Consumer Credit Market: Evidence from Lithuania
Next Article in Special Issue
University-Industry Cooperation: A Peer-Reviewed Bibliometric Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Island Development Model Specialisation: A Panel Data Analysis Comparing Evolutionary Tourism Model, Industrial to Community-Based (2010–2019)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Development of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills in Students in the Autonomous Province of Trento
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis

BRU-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Avenida das Forças Armadas, Edificio ISCTE, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal
Economies 2022, 10(9), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090209
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 4 August 2022 / Accepted: 25 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Economics of Education)

Abstract

:
Nowadays, university rankings are used to assess all aspects of universities. Due to the impact of university rankings on assessing the performance of universities, this research aims to explore university rankings in depth. University rankings are considered contributors to assessing university performance. Previous literature showed different types of goals, such as output and support goals, where the literature advised to align between these two types of goals. Universities have different goals, but still, university rankings measure all universities on the same criteria. Subsequently, this research has used the most used university rankings in the literature, QS world ranking dataset. Then unsupervised machine learning was performed to cluster the universities. The results divided universities among four clusters. This study helps in allocating the university in the adequate cluster. This study helps university managers define the goals of their universities. The study recommends universities align their support goals with their output goals. The study recommends universities to develop international goals and strategies, and support the research in the universities by supporting the scholars. This study’s novelty lies in connecting the university rankings and goals using management analytics in education.

1. Introduction

University rankings have shown a significant contribution to the universities’ decision-making (Hosier and Hoolash 2017). Universities’ rankings have become the dominant measure of higher education institutions’ performance (Ordorika and Lloyd 2015). University rankings were developed at the beginning of the 20th century and were published every 5 years (Hazelkorn 2011; Bugaj and Rybkowski 2018). The rankings were first developed to compare the scholarly power of American universities by assessing the research reputation of their academics (Bugaj and Rybkowski 2018). Nowadays, University rankings are used to assess universities internationally (Belov et al. 2018). Moreover, University rankings are used to assess the university as a whole rather than the research reputation solely. The study developed by (Hosier and Hoolash 2017) mentioned that decision-making in higher education institutions that are developed upon the league tables included several decision-makers from different levels in the higher education institutions. Moreover, in the previous literature, it is claimed that league tables are involved in the creation of decisions by several higher education institutions’ stakeholders (Hosier and Hoolash 2017).
Hazelkorn (2007) criticized university rankings as mentioning they are primitive and inappropriate for higher education institutions, whereas the university rankings mainly focus on research and reputation, where universities are pushed to increase their ranking. Tofallis (2012) also criticized the rankings of universities as they used an additive approach, where the various normalization techniques would lead to different results when applied to the same data. Tofallis (2012) advised that it is important not only to point out the weakness but to suggest ways to improve; hence, Tofallis (2012) proposed a multiplicative approach to aggregate the data and overcome the ranking differences. On the other hand, Hubbard et al. (2021) mentioned that even though university rankings are criticized in both their rationale and methodology, still the rankings are considered by university managers. The university ranking goal is to show the top university ranking. The famous university rankings are the QS World University Ranking, The Times higher education world university ranking, the Academic Ranking of World Universities, The US News & World Report Best Global University Rankings, and the National Taiwan University Ranking (Shehatta and Mahmood 2016). The QS-WUR and the other five major university rankings mentioned earlier show moderate-to-high internal correlations among them regardless of their methodological differences (Shehatta and Mahmood 2016; Cortés et al. 2022). The importance of university rankings has even been extended to the decision makers of public funding, such as research grants, laboratories, and researchers, where these decision-makers consider university rankings when funding decisions are made (Cortés et al. 2022). One of the factors that increased the importance of having rankings is the demand of the students and their families to collect more information about the university that they will invest in for the future; enrolling in a university is a long-term expensive investment that students and their families are committed to it (Dill and Soo 2005). The rankings influence the prestige of the university, in case of increasing or decreasing ranking. Accordingly, some universities use their rank as a marketing tool to promote the university to students and staff. Furthermore, the university’s position and international ranking promote universities to receive more international students (Hazelkorn 2007; Hosier and Hoolash 2017).
The position of the university in the rankings is even a core goal for the higher education institutions’ management team (Hazelkorn 2009; Hubbard et al. 2021). Subsequently, university managers are considering university rankings when developing their decisions. Universities such as other types of organizations face changes, whereas university managers have to adapt to the changes that they face (James and Derrick 2020). Therefore, university authorities more and more often decide to use management tools, such as strategic or macroeconomic analyses that might be successfully applied in other organizations (Bugaj and Rybkowski 2018). Part of the strategic analysis is setting the university goals by university managers. Whereas attaining a better University ranking is one of the ongoing goals for universities. Since the rising importance of the university rankings, university managers are committed to securing their relevant universities in the ranking list annually. Other university managers target a better position in the ranking list. Subsequently, each university set its ranking goal based on its current annual ranking and revisits the ranking goal to assess the need for development. In 1969, Gross proposed that there are different goals for organizations and also different intentions for the goals. Gross has developed his study specifically on universities, where he advised that goals are divided into two different kinds and are known as output goals and support goals. Output goals are described as the goals that reflect the output and support goals are described as goals at the ends of those goals who are charged with the responsibility for the maintenance activities. Intentions of the goals on the other side describe the view and perception of the managers in the organization as what they believe the organizational goals to be, and what direction the organization will tackle, whereas activities focus on what the person in the organization is actually doing and how resources are being allocated. Hence, it is important to distinguish between intentions, activities and outputs (Gross 1969).
Daft (2010) argues that organizations have different types of goals. These organizational goals are official goals and operative goals. The official goals mainly focus on the overall goal of the organization. An example of the official goals is the mission, vision and strategic plan, whereas the operative goal is described as the operative goal helping to reach the end goal through the actual operating procedures. It is highlighted those operative goals are the goals that show what the organization is actually trying to do. Operative goals are developed for the short run with measurable outcomes. Examples of the operative goals include resources goals, performance goals, market goals, productivity goals, innovation goals and employee development goals (Daft 2010).
Daft’s definition of the official goals aligns with Gross’s suggestion of output goals, as both concentrates on the ends. Daft and Gross also agree that support goals that are proposed by Gross, and operative goals defined by Daft help in supporting the official and output goals. Accordingly, this research emphasizes the similarity between official and output goals and also between support and operative goals. Whether an organization or a special type of organization such as a university, an official goal should be assigned, and subsequently operative goals should also be identified. In this research, we will refer to the goals as output and support goals.
Universities as a type of organization are known as complex organizations (Damrosch 1995; Bleiklie and Kogan 2007). Pinheiro and Young (2017, p. 120) stated that “Complex systems are nonlinear, dynamic and are characterized by many sub-entities and multiple connections or linkages between them (Morçöl 2012), and thus describe well the university and its environment”. Throughout the years, and with the change that is happening and the competitiveness in the market (Dill and Soo 2005), universities needed to adapt. As teaching and basic research are no longer the only university goals (Adamakou et al. 2021) but internationalization (Soliman et al. 2019; James and Derrick 2020), higher ranking (Tee 2015), better teaching and learning activities (Alzafari and Ursin 2019), and others, are also considered university goals. Hence, the creation of university goals is always challenging. The university managers need to define the output goal and then build the support goals that would include the activities that would finally attain the output goal. University managers also need to consider different faculties with the included departments when creating these goals.
Neo-liberal theory developed higher education institution policymaking in the whole world (Dougherty and Natow 2020). Universities whether public or private are encouraged to have new customers and to look for new streams of revenue (Cantwell and Kauppinen 2014; Teixeira and Dill 2011; Dougherty and Natow 2020). Moreover, strong accountability pressures are imposed on the public university, like intrusive audits, extensive data reporting & funding other bases of performance (Stensaker and Harvey 2011). Performance based funding for higher education institutions in the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe, and other contexts is a clear practice of neoliberal policy making (Broucker and de Wit 2015; Ferlie et al. 2008; Lane and Kivisto 2008; Dougherty and Natow 2020). Neoliberal theory shows a variety of theories like new public administration, new managerialism, principal agent theory and performance management (Bleiklie 1998; Broucker and de Wit 2015; Lane and Kivisto 2008; Dougherty and Natow 2020). The common factors between these theories are the economics of organization, in the form of public-choice theory, and transaction cost theory. Accordingly, neo-liberal theories are described as “the role of self-interested individuals and organizations and the role of material incentives in motivating them” (Dougherty and Natow 2020, p. 458).
In higher education institution, previous scholars showed that there are supporters and opposers to public based funding, the supporters think that it helps universities to improve higher education institution outcomes in efficiency and effectiveness (Dougherty and Natow 2015; Li 2017; Ness et al. 2015; Rabovsky 2014). Furthermore, scholars found in Europe, the supporter of public based funding is mainly because it influences university accountability (Frølich 2011). University accountability includes the university mission and the university goals, whereas scholars added that highlighting favorable performance indicators (ex: League tables and rankings) helps the university to strengthen its case for asking for more funding from the government (Dougherty and Natow 2015; Frølich 2011; Frølich et al. 2010; Rabovsky 2014; Dougherty and Natow 2020).
On the other hand, obstacles that are ignored by public based funding, are lack of organizational resources, unstable funding and a poor fit between public based funding indicators and the organization’s mission (Dougherty and Natow 2020). Subsequently, organizational goals are going to be affected as they are related to the organizational mission. Institution response to public based funding is also affected, whereas performance indicators change frequently, and institutions no longer know how much to expect as funding (Dougherty and Natow 2020). Accordingly, higher education institution performance will look poor according to the government standards but not according to institution standards (ex: Frølich et al. 2010; Guthrie and Neumann 2007).
Since one of the university goals is university ranking, in addition to the neoliberal approach of increasing university ranking, the research will focus on developing a deep understanding of the rankings from a university goal perspective. The ranking structure assesses universities on several criteria, and these criteria are applied to all universities equally. However, since universities have different output and support goals, the university ranking would be inadequate in describing the status of the university as the different university goals are not taken into consideration. The metric system that is used to rank universities fails to capture the full range of university productivity (Van Raan 2005; Pérez-Esparrells and Orduna-Malea 2018). Hence, universities shouldn’t be assessed only on the overall score. Accordingly, universities shouldn’t set university ranking as the main goal, as it is not considered a feasible goal. Therefore, we need to assess universities based on their respective goals. Some questions were raised by the author of this paper from the previous literature, such as “Could we show university ranking from a different perspective other than the overall score?”, “Could the universities be divided into clusters?” and “How many university clusters can be identified?”
Some researchers clustered universities from a theoretical perspective like Belov et al. (2018). Other researchers classified research universities as top and moderate research activity in Indian universities but did not include all types of universities (Jalote et al. 2020). Other scholars applied the cluster analysis using artificial intelligence to 137 technical universities using the Times Higher Education data set in 2018 (Pérez-Esparrells and Orduna-Malea 2018). However, this research will use artificial intelligence to help analyse the university rankings of all universities included in QS university rankings and to connect them with the different university variables. The research will use unsupervised classification known as data clustering. In a study developed by Bugaj and Rybkowski (2018), university strategy with assessment indicators of international university ranking was assessed. However, this study will focus on assessing university goals with the different university clusters generated from the university rankings. We will focus on clustering the universities according to the different criteria of the rankings and explore these developed clusters.
The novelty of this research is highlighting the importance of the relationship between goal setting and university rankings. Furthermore, classifying universities into clusters using unsupervised machine learning classification is considered a novel way to classify universities. Finally, this research contributes to management education and management analytics studies by matching the university goals with the university's performance. As this research will help in better defining the university performance as university rankings in a novel way that mainly focuses on the achievements of the universities.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the data and the methodology used. Section 3 shows the results and the discussion. Section 4 is devoted to the main conclusions and implications.

2. Methodology

The data used for this study is the ranking of universities for the year 2022 with the six ranking indicators. The data are obtained from the official website of the QS university ranking for the relevant year. The data can be downloaded on the respective website (QS World University Ranking 2022). The ranking indicators used in QS university rankings and also used in this study are international student ratio, international faculty ratio, faculty-student ratio, citations per faculty, academic reputation, and employer reputation. The academic reputation score and employer reputation score metrics are assessed using surveys, hence these metrics are based on perceptions of the academics and employers. The other four metrics are based on numerical data. The citation per faculty score may be affected by universities publishing in languages other than English (Locke et al. 2008; Ordorika and Lloyd 2015). The QS world ranking was selected as it is one of the most-discussed rankings in recent literature (Cortés et al. 2022). An explanation of the ranking indicators is found in Table 1.
Clustering helps in classifying the patterns of data, observations or feature vectors into groups or clusters (Jain et al. 1999). The overall goal of clustering is to group objects into clusters based only on their observable vectors, hence each cluster will contain objects with similar properties and different clusters that have distinct features (Bertsimas et al. 2021). In this study, we will use clustering algorithms to group universities into different clusters. Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) belongs to the class of model-based clustering or distribution models. A mixture model describes a dataset by combining a mix of two or more probability distributions. One of the benefits of the mixture model is using soft clustering, where it fits a set of probabilistic models to the data. GMM uses an expected maximization (EM) algorithm to estimate the model components and the appropriate number of clusters. Subsequently, cases are assigned to the cluster of the distribution under which they are most likely (Rhys 2020). In this study GMM clustering is used, GMM helps in identifying ellipsoidal-shaped clusters when the cluster is modelled as a Gaussian distribution. GMM also provides a better quantitative measure of fitness per number of clusters (Patel and Kushwaha 2020).
Regarding this study, cluster analysis is applied to the ranking indicators of the universities that were mentioned above to generate the different university clusters. Then we will analyze the generated clusters to better understand the classifications of the universities rather than just to rely on the rankings of QS world ranking.
Data analysis is performed using Python using Pandas package (McKinney 2010). After data are downloaded, transformations were applied to the data in order to correct the detected quality issues and prepare the modelling of the data. The following actions were applied: removal of observations with missing values. Then the correlation between the ranking indicators was performed. We have found a high correlation between academic reputation score and employer reputation score. Another correlation is found between international faculty score and international student score. Hence, employer reputation score and international faculty score variables were removed. Moreover, data were normalized in this research in the range of (0,1) using the mean max scaler method. Since the dataset is associated with a distribution that is a mixture of two or more clusters and the benefits of GMM which is accompanied by the normalization of the dataset, this study will use GMM in clustering the data.

3. Results

The dataset used for this study is the QS world ranking for universities in 2022. The dataset shows the six different metrics used in university ranking. These metrics are used to assign scores for the universities, and they are considered an output from the universities, these outputs are considered performance indicators and they are eventually considered a reflection of the university goals.
An initial summary of the statistics of the data including the count, mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, 25%, 50%, and 75% are shown in Table 2.
GMM clustering was performed. The elbow method was used to determine the optimum number of clusters when using Akaike’s Information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC) (Chen et al. 2017), hence 4 clusters were identified as depicted in Figure 1.
Four clusters were identified dividing the universities among these clusters. Table 3 shows the means of variables for each cluster.
In this study, we decided to analyze mainly the scores of the university that are provided by the QS World University Ranking. So, we decided to include only the scores and not including the ranking of the university as an input in the development and the analysis of this study. Accordingly, the cluster analysis that has been developed in this paper shows how the scores given to each university have allocated the university to a unique cluster that is represented by a specific and unique criterion.
Furthermore, the results show a new way of classifying universities using secondary data as QS World University Ranking, where the general ranking of universities is no longer the only method of defining the performance of the universities; each cluster represents universities in a different approach rather than its designated ranking in the league table. These results show a more into depth analysis of the scores provided in the QS league table. Where we can’t equally assess universities when the clusters show otherwise. Cluster analysis helped in showing that by using the annual scores provided by QS, universities are no longer related to one cluster. However, they were designated among four unique clusters, which means their activities and development over the year have led them to this cluster. From a neoliberal perspective, this new representation would help in showing universities with different outputs rather that just the overall ranking. Hence the neoliberalism theory focuses on the efficiency and effectiveness of universities being improved by addressing the cluster analysis.
The first cluster is the cluster that has universities that scored high in citation per faculty. It includes 270 universities (Check Table A1). According to this cluster universities that mainly focus on research and its outcomes as published work are the universities that are found in this cluster. Moreover, this cluster highlights the universities whose main goal is to have more citations for each researcher. These universities practically promote research by having supportive learning culture for their research staff to transfer the knowledge to have more publications as research outcomes (Islam 2019). When the researcher of this study compared the cluster in relevance to the rankings of the universities, the results showed that the cluster isn’t related to the rankings of the universities, whereas the cluster included 240 universities that ranged in the ranking from 255 to 1201. These findings advise fund managers from organizations and governments to direct the funding support to universities in this cluster, as this cluster shows high quality research produced by universities that mainly focus on research development and high-quality research outputs. This study also advises students and scholars, whose main focus is to be researchers, to join the universities in this cluster. Scholars would benefit from the publications and subsequently citations as this would help in receiving recognition, promotions and esteem from the academic community. Universities focus on academic publications and citations as it helps in gaining more opportunities as funding and opportunities for future research (Gu and Blackmore 2019; Fox 1983; Sullivan 1996).
The second cluster is the cluster where the group of universities aren’t having a significant collaboration in the tested variables. The number of universities that are found in this cluster is 262 (see Table A1). Moreover, when the cluster is compared to the rankings, these universities lay in the rankings from 445 to 1201. The cluster results show a low contribution of the universities in this cluster to all variables, where this study recommends to these universities align between their goals and their actions.
The third cluster is the cluster with universities that excel in both faculty student scores and international student scores. In total, 297 universities in this cluster focused on both faculty student scores and international student scores (see Table A1). These universities’ main goal is to increase the quality of teaching by having less teaching burden on the teachers and attracting international students. When comparing the rankings to this cluster, the results showed that universities ranged from 250 to 1201. The results show that these universities capitalized mainly on being international universities to attract international students and provide high quality education to support students for the international market. Internationalization is a reflection of the globalization of the labor markets and economies (James and Derrick 2020; Qiang 2003). This study recommends that teaching staff that are more focused on teaching to target working in the universities in this cluster, and students that are interested in enrolling in international universities target universities in this cluster. Internationalization helps in widening the transformation of higher education institutions, as it helps to manage the change in the environment (James and Derrick 2020). Internationalization also has increasing importance in universities as a concept and as a set of activities (Soliman et al. 2019). Hence, Universities in the third cluster are adapting to the change by working on internationalization as shown by this study’s results.
The fourth cluster is the cluster with universities that have shown contribution in all variables like academic reputation score, faculty student score, citation faculty score and international student score. This cluster includes 445 universities (see Table A1). When comparing the rankings to this cluster, the results showed that universities ranged from 1 to 1000. These results reflect the universities acquired outputs over the year that including academic reputation score, faculty student score, citation faculty score and international student score. These results indicate that universities in this cluster perform strongly in the relevant metrics.
If we decided to represent the cluster with the old rankings, we will find that each cluster includes different universities with a wide range of non-sequential and non-continuous rankings. Appendix A shows the universities’ rankings, names and their respective cluster. The clusters mentioned above are also visible in the boxplots (see Figure 2) for variables academic reputation score, faculty student score, citation per faculty score, and international student score. Where clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 are represented in blue, yellow, green and orange respectively.

4. Conclusions

Universities face national and international competition in the market every day; university rankings also increase competition among universities (Hazelkorn 2009). Accordingly, the governments try to support universities to improve their academic quality to be able to survive in the market (Dill and Soo 2005). Higher education institutions’ performance is compared through university rankings as it helps student consumers to choose a suitable university. Moreover, it helps universities and policymakers in identifying the areas that need improvement (Dill and Soo 2005).
Since university ranking is an important performance measure that all universities consider in their goal setting and strategies, this study examines university rankings from a different perspective. We need to look at the universities according to the defined clusters not according to the order of the university in the overall ranking of universities.
This study shows that universities are divided into four clusters. Cluster one showed universities that excel in research through their citations. The second cluster represents universities that don’t have a significant collaboration in all four tested variables. The third cluster shows universities that focus on internationalization where they most excel in both faculty students score and international student scores. Finally, the fourth cluster represents universities that have output shown in all four variables.
The results of this study imply that universities need to align their support goals with their intended output goals as Gross in 1969 proposed in the previous literature. The study also agrees with Bugaj and Rybkowski (2018) that support goals help universities establish the functioning of the whole university, which will influence the activities of the employees.
Higher education institutions have set public criteria for scholars (Gu and Blackmore 2019; Sullivan 1996). Accordingly, this study advises universities that have in their goals to have more citations and grow the research and join the first cluster, to set public criteria for the scholars. Other implications can be providing scholars with research workshops, time to develop the research and more collaboration with researchers from other respective institutions (Van’t Land et al. 2021).
Soliman et al. 2019, advised that universities need to develop international goals and strategies as internationalization is part of the performance measures of universities. Internationalization is now considered a separate set of performance measures in QS World University Ranking (Soliman et al. 2019; Jöns and Hoyler 2013). Hence, this study agrees with the study of Soliman et al. (2019) and advise universities that need to position themselves among universities in the third cluster to develop their international goals by creating international programs, accepting international student and staff and opening new branches in different countries (Van’t Land et al. 2021). Moreover, this study agrees with Bugaj and Rybkowski (2018) that internationalization helps to compete among other universities. The university that needs to increase its ranking in the fourth cluster must work on all four variables simultaneously, by setting its goals on all four variables and their supporting goals.
The author recommends league tables institutions use the cluster analysis developed in this study when developing the ranking, as it will help the classification of the universities efficiently. The author would recommend future work, clustering the universities on an annual basis to see the change in each cluster. This can also help in assessing the university outputs on an annual basis.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of universities with the respective cluster.
Table A1. List of universities with the respective cluster.
Rank_2022Inst_NameCluster
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)4
2University of Oxford4
3=Stanford University4
3=University of Cambridge4
5Harvard University4
6California Institute of Technology (Caltech)4
7Imperial College London4
8=ETH Zurich-Swiss Federal Institute of Technology4
8=UCL4
10University of Chicago4
11National University of Singapore (NUS)4
12Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU)4
13University of Pennsylvania4
14=EPFL4
14=Yale University4
16The University of Edinburgh4
17Tsinghua University4
18Peking University4
19Columbia University4
20Princeton University4
21Cornell University4
22The University of Hong Kong4
23=The University of Tokyo4
23=University of Michigan-Ann Arbor4
25Johns Hopkins University4
26University of Toronto4
27=McGill University4
27=The Australian National University4
27=The University of Manchester4
30Northwestern University4
31Fudan University4
32University of California, Berkeley (UCB)4
33Kyoto University4
34The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology4
35King’s College London4
36Seoul National University4
37The University of Melbourne4
38The University of Sydney4
39The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)4
40University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)4
41KAIST-Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology4
42New York University (NYU)4
43The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)4
44Université PSL4
45Zhejiang University4
46University of British Columbia4
47The University of Queensland4
48University of California, San Diego (UCSD)4
49=Institut Polytechnique de Paris4
49The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)4
50=Shanghai Jiao Tong University4
50=Technical University of Munich4
52Duke University4
53=Carnegie Mellon University4
53=City University of Hong Kong4
55University of Amsterdam4
56Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech)4
57Delft University of Technology4
58Monash University4
60Brown University4
61The University of Warwick4
62University of Bristol4
63Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg4
64Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München4
65Universiti Malaya (UM)4
66The Hong Kong Polytechnic University4
67University of Texas at Austin4
68National Taiwan University (NTU)4
69Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)4
70=KU Leuven4
70=University of Zurich4
72Sorbonne University4
73University of Glasgow4
74Korea University4
75=Osaka University4
75=University of Wisconsin-Madison4
77University of Southampton4
78Lomonosov Moscow State University4
79=University of Copenhagen4
79=Yonsei University4
81Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)4
82=Durham University4
82=Tohoku University4
82=University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign4
85=The University of Auckland4
85=University of Washington4
86=Université Paris-Saclay4
87Lund University4
88Georgia Institute of Technology4
89KTH Royal Institute of Technology4
90University of Birmingham4
91University of St Andrews4
92University of Leeds4
93The University of Western Australia4
94Rice University4
95The University of Sheffield4
96Pennsylvania State University4
97Sungkyunkwan University(SKKU)4
98University of Science and Technology of China4
99Technical University of Denmark4
100University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill4
101Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin4
102University of Oslo4
103University of Nottingham4
104University of Helsinki4
105=Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México(UNAM)4
105=University of Geneva4
107Washington University in St. Louis4
108The University of Adelaide4
108=University of California, Davis4
109King Abdulaziz University (KAU)4
110Utrecht University4
111Université de Montréal4
112=Aalto University4
112=Boston University4
112=Leiden University4
112=University of Southern California4
116Purdue University4
117Queen Mary University of London4
118Nagoya University4
119University of Bern4
120The Ohio State University4
121=Chalmers University of Technology4
121=Universidade de São Paulo4
123Wageningen University & Research4
124Uppsala University4
125Eindhoven University of Technology4
126University of Alberta4
127Freie Universitaet Berlin4
128=Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin4
128=University of Groningen4
130École Normale Supérieure de Lyon4
131Nanjing University4
132Lancaster University4
133University of Technology Sydney4
134Newcastle University4
135Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC)4
136KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology4
137Kyushu University4
138=University of Basel4
140McMaster University4
141Ghent University4
142Politecnico di Milano4
143Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)4
144Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)4
145Hokkaido University4
146University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)4
147Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)4
148Stockholm University4
149=The University of Exeter4
149=University of Waterloo4
151=Cardiff University4
151=University of Vienna4
151=University of York4
154University of Rochester4
155Aarhus University4
156Hanyang University4
157Michigan State University4
158University of Maryland, College Park4
159Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)4
160Emory University4
161=Case Western Reserve University4
161=Tecnológico de Monterrey4
163=King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals4
163=University of Pittsburgh4
165RWTH Aachen University4
166=Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna4
166=University of Bath4
168=Texas A&M University4
168=Universitat de Barcelona4
170Western University4
171Sapienza University of Rome4
172Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg4
173=University College Dublin4
173=University of Florida4
175Al-Farabi Kazakh National University4
176University of Lausanne4
177=Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen4
177=Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)4
179Erasmus University Rotterdam4
180=National Tsing Hua University4
180=Technische Universität Wien4
180=University of Gothenburg4
183=Khalifa University of Science and Technology4
183=Universidad de Chile4
185Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)4
186=Indian Institute of Science4
186=University of Minnesota Twin Cities4
188Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)4
189=University of Liverpool4
189=University of Twente4
191=Dartmouth College4
191=Universiti Teknologi Malaysia4
193University of Wollongong4
194=Curtin University4
194=Technische Universität Dresden4
194=University of Otago4
197The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON)4
198The Hebrew University of Jerusalem4
199University of Bergen4
200Macquarie University4
201Keio University4
202University of Reading4
203Waseda University4
204University of Göttingen4
205University of Aberdeen4
206RMIT University4
207=Universidad Autónoma de Madrid4
207=Universite libre de Bruxelles4
209=Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona4
209=Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam4
211Tongji University4
212Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)4
213Queensland University of Technology (QUT)4
214Universität Hamburg4
215Chulalongkorn University4
216=Arizona State University4
216=Queen’s University Belfast4
218Vanderbilt University4
219Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)4
220Radboud University4
221Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)4
222University of Notre Dame4
223Complutense University of Madrid4
224Qatar University4
225Wuhan University4
226=Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn4
226=University of Cape Town4
226=University of Sussex4
226=University of Virginia4
230University of Ottawa4
231Loughborough University4
232University of California, Irvine4
233=Maastricht University4
233=University of Antwerp4
235University of Calgary4
236=Harbin Institute of Technology4
236=Universidad de los Andes4
236=University of Leicester4
236=Victoria University of Wellington4
240=Queen’s University at Kingston4
240=USI-Università della Svizzera italiana4
242=American University of Beirut (AUB)4
242=Saint Petersburg State University4
242=Università di Padova4
245Ecole des Ponts ParisTech4
246=Novosibirsk State University4
246=University of Massachusetts Amherst4
248=Georgetown University4
248=Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona)4
250Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD)3
251University of Colorado Boulder4
252=National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)4
252=Yeshiva University4
254Gadjah Mada University4
255=Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM)4
255=Mahidol University4
255=Tel Aviv University1
258=National University of Ireland Galway4
258=Universidad Nacional de Colombia4
258University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha4
260Sun Yat-sen University4
261=Sciences Po3
261=Université de Paris4
264=Kyung Hee University4
264=Rutgers University–New Brunswick4
266=Charles University4
266=University of Navarra4
268=National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University4
268=The University of Arizona4
269=Technical University of Darmstadt4
270=Beijing Normal University4
270=Heriot-Watt University4
272=Dalhousie University4
272=Tomsk State University3
272=University of Surrey4
275=Southern University of Science and Technology4
275=Tufts University4
277=Graz University of Technology3
277=Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK)1
277=King Saud University4
280Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP)1
281=Bauman Moscow State Technical University3
281=Universität Innsbruck3
283Deakin University4
284Massey University4
285=University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC)4
285=University of Tsukuba4
287Hong Kong Baptist University4
288=United Arab Emirates University3
290=Griffith University4
290=Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT/Moscow Phystech)3
290=Universitas Indonesia4
290=Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne4
290=Xi’an Jiaotong University1
295=Belarusian State University3
295=University of Porto4
295=University of Turku4
298=Simon Fraser University4
298=University College Cork4
300=North Carolina State University1
300=University of Tartu3
302University of Strathclyde4
303=Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB)4
303=University of Tasmania4
305=Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)1
305=HSE University4
307University of East Anglia (UEA)4
308University of Warsaw4
309=Jagiellonian University4
309=University of Southern Denmark (SDU)4
311=Indiana University Bloomington4
311=University of Cologne4
311=University of Miami4
314=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)4
314=Université Grenoble Alpes4
316University of Milan4
317=IE University3
317=RUDN University3
319=National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)3
319=Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC)4
321Swinburne University of Technology4
322=University of Dundee4
322=Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg4
322=Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina3
322=University of Macau4
326=Aalborg University4
326=University of South Australia4
328L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (ENU)3
329Linköping University4
330=City, University of London4
330=Technion-Israel Institute of Technology1
332=Birkbeck, University of London4
332=Taylor’s University3
334=Huazhong University of Science and Technology1
334=National Taiwan Normal University4
334=Politecnico di Torino4
334=Royal Holloway University of London4
334=Tianjin University1
334=University of Victoria (UVic)4
340=Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main4
340=University of Hawaii at Mānoa4
342Northeastern University4
343Hiroshima University3
344=Universität Jena3
344=Universiti Teknologi Brunei3
346Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University4
347=Kazan (Volga region) Federal University3
347=UCSI University3
347=Universität Stuttgart4
347=University of California, Santa Cruz1
351=Brunel University London4
351=Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)4
351=Ural Federal University-UrFU3
354Johannes Kepler University Linz4
355George Washington University4
356=Tilburg University4
356=University of Lisbon4
358=Nankai University1
358=National University of Sciences And Technology (NUST) Islamabad3
358=University of Jyväskylä3
358=University of Utah4
362=Ewha Womans University3
362=La Trobe University4
362=MGIMO University3
365=ITMO University3
365=Umea University3
365=University Ulm4
368Sultan Qaboos University3
369=Norwegian University of Science And Technology4
369=Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro4
371Universitat Politècnica de València3
372Lincoln University4
373=Beijing Institute of Technology1
373=University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague3
373=University of Connecticut4
373=University of Waikato4
377University of Oulu1
378=Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg1
378=Quaid-i-Azam University1
378=Stony Brook University, State University of New York4
381=Sharif University of Technology1
381=Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU)3
383=American University of Sharjah3
383=Beihang University (former BUAA)1
383=University of Kent4
386Kobe University4
387University of Kansas3
388=University at Buffalo SUNY4
388=University of Pisa4
390Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele4
391=SOAS University of London3
391=Universidad de Palermo (UP)3
393=Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University3
393=Ruhr-Universität Bochum4
395=Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG)1
395=National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University3
395=Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú4
399University of the Philippines4
400=Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)1
400=Universidad Austral3
400=Vilnius University3
403=Czech Technical University in Prague3
403=Shandong University1
403=University of California, Riverside1
407=Flinders University4
407=South China University of Technology1
407=Taipei Medical University (TMU)3
407=Xiamen University1
411Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster4
412=National Sun Yat-sen University4
412=Pontificia Universidad Javeriana4
414=Chung-Ang University (CAU)3
414=Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT1
414=Tampere University1
414=Université Laval4
414=Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)1
414=University of Colorado, Denver3
414=University of Science and Technology Beijing1
421=National Technical University of Athens1
421=Université de Strasbourg4
423Universität Mannheim4
424=James Cook University4
424=University of Naples-Federico II4
424=University of Witwatersrand1
427=Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz4
427=Washington State University1
429=Oxford Brookes University4
429=Wake Forest University3
431=Colorado State University3
431=Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute4
431=Universidade Nova de Lisboa4
434=Universidade Federal de São Paulo3
434=University of Johannesburg3
436=Shanghai University4
436=Tulane University3
436=University of Canberra4
439Essex, University of4
440=Swansea University4
440=University of Cyprus (UCY)4
440=University of Trento1
440=University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway3
444Illinois Institute of Technology4
445=HUFS-Hankuk (Korea) University of Foreign Studies3
445=The American University in Cairo2
447=Umm Al-Qura University3
447=UniversitätLeipzig3
447=Universität des Saarlandes3
450University of Milano-Bicocca1
451=Auckland University of Technology (AUT)3
451=Bond University3
451=Sichuan University1
451=University of Florence4
455=Brandeis University4
455=University of Coimbra4
455=University of Iowa4
458University of Saskatchewan4
459=Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)4
459=University of St.Gallen (HSG)4
461=Colorado School of Mines1
461=Far Eastern Federal University3
461=Goldsmiths, University of London4
461=Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg3
465=Airlangga University2
465=Amirkabir University of Technology1
465=Southeast University1
465=Universidad de Belgrano3
469=National Taipei University of Technology4
469=Universidad de Montevideo (UM)3
471=Ben-Gurion University of The Negev1
471=Hasselt University3
471=Universidad ORT Uruguay3
471=University of Stirling4
475Florida State University1
476University of Missouri, Columbia4
477=Bar-Ilan University1
477=Chiba University3
477=University of Texas Dallas4
480=Chang Gung University4
480=Université de Liège4
482=Auezov South Kazakhstan University (SKU)3
482=Stellenbosch University1
482=The Catholic University of Korea3
485=Aston University4
485=University of Turin4
487=The National University of Science and Technology MISIS3
487=Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH)4
487=Yokohama City University3
490=Dublin City University3
490=Justus-Liebig-University Giessen1
492=UNESP4
492=University of Granada4
494=Western Sydney University4
494=Boston College1
494=Christian-Albrechts-University zu Kiel4
494=Dongguk University3
494=Iowa State University1
494=Sogang University3
494=University of Rome “Tor Vergata”4
494=York University4
501–510Aix-Marseille University4
501–510Jilin University4
501–510Satbayev University3
501–510Universidad de La Habana2
501–510Universität Konstanz1
501–510University of Bordeaux4
501–510University of Delhi4
501–510University of Klagenfurt3
501–510University of Limerick1
501–510Warsaw University of Technology4
511–520Bogor Agricultural University2
511–520Koç University3
511–520Missouri University of Science and Technology1
511–520Singapore Management University4
511–520Universidad de Alcalá3
511–520Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)3
511–520University of Balamand3
511–520V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University3
511–520Wayne State University3
521–530Central South University1
521–530China University of Geosciences4
521–530Concordia University4
521–530Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU) (formerly UNIVERSITY OF DAMMAM)3
521–530National Central University1
521–530Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” de Las Villas3
521–530Université de Montpellier4
521–530University of Bayreuth4
521–530University of Eastern Finland4
521–530University of Tehran1
531–540Ajou University3
531–540East China Normal University4
531–540Hitotsubashi University3
531–540Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA)3
531–540Lehigh University4
531–540Nagasaki University3
531–540National Research Saratov State University3
531–540Oregon State University1
531–540Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)3
531–540Southern Federal University3
531–540Universidad de Zaragoza3
531–540University of Delaware1
541–550Aberystwyth University4
541–550Iran University of Science and Technology1
541–550Kyungpook National University3
541–550Niigata University3
541–550Northwestern Polytechnical University4
541–550Sabanci University3
541–550The University of Georgia1
541–550The University of Tennessee, Knoxville1
541–550University of Ulsan4
551–560Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University3
551–560Aristotle University of Thessaloniki1
551–560Kazakh National Agrarian University KazNAU3
551–560Masaryk University4
551–560Middle East Technical University1
551–560Universidad de Sevilla4
551–560Universidad Panamericana (UP)3
551–560Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore3
551–560Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III3
551–560University of Szeged3
561–570Altai State University3
561–570Hallym University3
561–570Inha University3
561–570Jawaharlal Nehru University4
561–570Technische Universität Braunschweig3
561–570The New School3
561–570Università degli Studi di Pavia1
561–570Université de Fribourg4
571–580Cairo University4
571–580Dalian University of Technology1
571–580East China University of Science and Technology1
571–580Holy Spirit University of Kaslik3
571–580Hunan University1
571–580Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University3
571–580Jeonbuk National University3
571–580Osaka City University3
571–580Universität Bremen1
571–580Universitat de Valencia1
571–580University of Minho3
571–580University of Nebraska-Lincoln1
581–590Lebanese American University3
581–590Lingnan University, Hong Kong3
581–590Murdoch University4
581–590Okayama University3
581–590Samara National Research University (Samara University)3
581–590Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)4
581–590University of Guelph1
581–590University of South Florida1
591–600Applied Science University-Bahrain3
591–600Bilkent University1
591–600Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad1
591–600Kumamoto University3
591–600National Chengchi University3
591–600Savitribai Phule Pune University3
591–600Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”3
591–600Universidad Externado de Colombia2
591–600Universität Regensburg3
591–600Université du Québec4
591–600University of Debrecen3
591–600University of Electronic Science and Technology of China1
591–600University of Ljubljana3
601–650Abo Akademi University1
601–650American University in Dubai3
601–650Ateneo de Manila University2
601–650Bangor University4
601–650Canadian University Dubai3
601–650Carleton University4
601–650Central Queensland University (CQUniversity Australia)3
601–650Chiang Mai University2
601–650China Agricultural University1
601–650Clark University4
601–650Coventry University3
601–650Gifu University3
601–650Kanazawa University3
601–650Kingston University, London3
601–650Konkuk University3
601–650Leibniz University Hannover3
601–650Management and Science University3
601–650Palacký University Olomouc3
601–650Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice3
601–650Pusan National University1
601–650Renmin (People’s) University of China1
601–650S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University3
601–650Sejong University1
601–650Shenzhen University3
601–650Smith College3
601–650Soochow University1
601–650Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv2
601–650Thammasat University2
601–650Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology1
601–650Universidad Anáhuac México2
601–650Universidad de Concepción2
601–650Universidad Pontificia Comillas2
601–650Universitat Ramon Llull3
601–650University of Aveiro1
601–650University of Cincinnati1
601–650University of Genoa1
601–650University of Hohenheim4
601–650University of Jordan4
601–650University of Manitoba3
601–650University of Plymouth4
601–650University of Pretoria1
601–650University of Sharjah3
601–650University of Siena1
601–650University of South Carolina1
601–650University Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas3
601–650Victoria University4
651–700American University3
651–700Chongqing University1
651–700College of William and Mary3
651–700Comenius University in Bratislava3
651–700Drexel University4
651–700Edith Cowan University4
651–700Eötvös Loránd University4
651–700Free University of Bozen-Bolzano4
651–700Howard University3
651–700Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University3
651–700International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)3
651–700Jadavpur University1
651–700Kagoshima University3
651–700Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz3
651–700King Khalid University2
651–700Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS)2
651–700Lobachevsky University3
651–700Macau University of Science and Technology4
651–700Michigan Technological University1
651–700National and Kapodistrian University of Athens1
651–700National Chung Hsing University1
651–700National Technical University”Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”3
651–700Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro4
651–700Sechenov University3
651–700Sunway University3
651–700Syracuse University4
651–700Tokushima University3
651–700Ulster University3
651–700Universidad de Antioquia2
651–700Universidad ICESI3
651–700Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH)2
651–700Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana2
651–700Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais4
651–700Universität Rostock3
651–700Université Claude Bernard Lyon 11
651–700Universiti Teknologi MARA-UiTM2
651–700University of Crete1
651–700University of Hull4
651–700University of Hyderabad1
651–700University of Kentucky1
651–700University of Massachusetts Boston1
651–700University of Mons4
651–700University of New Brunswick3
651–700University of New Mexico1
651–700University of Oklahoma1
651–700University of Oregon1
651–700University of Pecs3
651–700University of Portsmouth3
651–700University of Salamanca4
651–700University of Trieste1
651–700University of Vermont3
651–700Zayed University2
701–750Abu Dhabi University3
701–750Ajman University3
701–750Al Ain University3
701–750Beijing University of Technology3
701–750Boğaziçi University1
701–750Brno University of Technology3
701–750Charles Darwin University4
701–750City University of New York2
701–750Gunma University3
701–750Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar1
701–750Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA)3
701–750Istanbul Technical University1
701–750Jouf University2
701–750Lebanese University3
701–750Middlesex University3
701–750National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”2
701–750New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)4
701–750Northumbria University at Newcastle3
701–750Notre Dame University-Louaize NDU3
701–750O.P. Jindal Global University2
701–750Osaka Prefecture University3
701–750Philipps-Universität Marburg1
701–750Plekhanov Russian University of Economics3
701–750Politecnico di Bari1
701–750Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd university3
701–750Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University ETU-LETI3
701–750Stevens Institute of Technology4
701–750Sumy State University3
701–750Tokyo Metropolitan University1
701–750Ufa State Aviation Technical University3
701–750Universidad de La Sabana2
701–750Universidad de San Andrés-UdeSA2
701–750Universidad Iberoamericana IBERO2
701–750Universidade de Santiago de Compostela1
701–750Universität Potsdam4
701–750Universitat Rovira i Virgili1
701–750Université Côte d\’Azur4
701–750Université de Sousse3
701–750University of Bradford4
701–750University of Haifa3
701–750University of Houston1
701–750University of Huddersfield3
701–750University of Modena and Reggio Emilia1
701–750University of Southern Queensland4
701–750University of the Basque Country3
701–750University of Westminster3
701–750University of Windsor4
701–750Virginia Commonwealth University3
751–800American University of the Middle East3
751–800Belarusian National Technical University (BNTU)3
751–800Bournemouth University4
751–800Chonnam National University3
751–800Chungnam National University3
751–800Clarkson University1
751–800Dankook University2
751–800Georgia State University1
751–800Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS Surabaya)2
751–800Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN)2
751–800Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM)2
751–800Jamia Millia Islamia3
751–800Jinan University (China)4
751–800Karaganda State Technical University3
751–800Keele University4
751–800Lanzhou University1
751–800Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India2
751–800Maynooth University1
751–800Memorial University of Newfoundland4
751–800Northwest University (China)3
751–800Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso2
751–800Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University3
751–800Riga Technical University3
751–800Ritsumeikan University1
751–800Shiraz University1
751–800Southern Cross University4
751–800Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)3
751–800Temple University1
751–800Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez2
751–800Universidad de la República (Udelar)2
751–800Universidad del Rosario2
751–800Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ)2
751–800Universidad Torcuato Di Tella3
751–800Universidade Federal do Rio Grande Do Sul4
751–800Università degli Studi di Perugia1
751–800Université de Sherbrooke1
751–800Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN)3
751–800University at Albany SUNY1
751–800University Duesseldorf3
751–800University of Brescia1
751–800University of Central Florida1
751–800University of Denver3
751–800University of Greenwich3
751–800University of Maryland, Baltimore County1
751–800University of Zagreb2
751–800Vilnius Gediminas Technical University3
751–800Worcester Polytechnic Institute4
801–1000Academician Y.A. Buketov Karaganda University2
801–1000Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań2
801–1000AGH University of Science and Technology3
801–1000Ain Shams University2
801–1000Ankara Üniversitesi2
801–1000Anna University1
801–1000Auburn University1
801–1000Australian Catholic University3
801–1000Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology2
801–1000Beijing Foreign Studies University3
801–1000Beijing Jiaotong University1
801–1000Beijing University of Chinese Medicine3
801–1000Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications1
801–1000Beirut Arab University3
801–1000Bielefeld University1
801–1000Binghamton University SUNY1
801–1000Budapest University of Technology and Economics1
801–1000Ca’ Foscari University of Venice1
801–1000Catania University1
801–1000Charles Sturt University3
801–1000Clemson University1
801–1000Corvinus University of Budapest3
801–1000Cracow University of Technology (Politechnika Krakowska)2
801–1000CY Cergy Paris University3
801–1000Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague3
801–1000De La Salle University2
801–1000De Montfort University3
801–1000Edinburgh Napier University3
801–1000Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation2
801–1000Florida International University1
801–1000Fordham University3
801–1000Gdańsk University of Technology3
801–1000George Mason University1
801–1000German Jordanian University3
801–1000Gulf University for Science and Technology3
801–1000Hacettepe University2
801–1000Harbin Engineering University1
801–1000Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis1
801–1000International Christian University1
801–1000Islamic University of Madinah3
801–1000Istanbul University1
801–1000Jordan University of Science & Technology3
801–1000Kansas State University1
801–1000Kasetsart University2
801–1000Kaunas University of Technology3
801–1000Kazakh Ablai Khan University of International Relations and World Languages2
801–1000Kazakh-British Technical University2
801–1000Kazan National Research Technological University3
801–1000Khon Kaen University2
801–1000King Faisal University2
801–1000King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi2
801–1000Kyoto Institute of Technology1
801–1000Kyushu Institute of Technology1
801–1000Liverpool John Moores University3
801–1000Lodz University of Technology3
801–1000London Metropolitan University3
801–1000London South Bank University3
801–1000Louisiana State University1
801–1000Loyola University Chicago1
801–1000Lviv Polytechnic National University2
801–1000Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU)3
801–1000Mendel University in Brno3
801–1000Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology2
801–1000Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics1
801–1000National Chung Cheng University1
801–1000Nicolaus Copernicus University2
801–1000NJSC KIMEP University3
801–1000Nottingham Trent University3
801–1000Novosibirsk State Technical University3
801–1000Oklahoma State University1
801–1000Paris Lodron University of Salzburg4
801–1000Perm State National Research University2
801–1000Pondicherry University1
801–1000Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2
801–1000Poznań University of Technology2
801–1000Prince of Songkla University2
801–1000Princess Sumaya University for Technology3
801–1000Qassim University2
801–1000Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh3
801–1000Rhodes University4
801–1000Riga Stradins University3
801–1000Robert Gordon University3
801–1000Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration2
801–1000Rutgers University–Newark1
801–1000Ryerson University1
801–1000Seattle University3
801–1000Shinshu University3
801–1000Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)2
801–1000Silesian University of Technology2
801–1000Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava2
801–1000Sophia University3
801–1000South Ural State University (National Research University)3
801–1000Southern Methodist University3
801–1000Széchenyi István University2
801–1000Szent Istvan University3
801–1000Technical University of Kosice3
801–1000Technical University of Liberec3
801–1000Technological University Dublin3
801–1000Tecnológico de Costa Rica -TEC2
801–1000Texas Tech University1
801–1000The University of Alabama1
801–1000Tokyo University of Science1
801–1000TU Dortmund University1
801–1000Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (UAEH)2
801–1000Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex)2
801–1000Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM)2
801–1000Universidad Católica Andres Bello2
801–1000Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UCU)2
801–1000Universidad de Guadalajara (UDG)2
801–1000Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP)3
801–1000Universidad de Los Andes-(ULA) Mérida2
801–1000Universidad de los Andes-Chile2
801–1000Universidad del Valle2
801–1000Universidad Diego Portales (UDP)2
801–1000Universidad EAFIT2
801–1000Universidad Nacional de Córdoba-UNC2
801–1000Universidad Simón Bolívar (USB)2
801–1000Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María (USM)2
801–1000Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá (UTP)2
801–1000Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (UTN)2
801–1000Universidade Católica Portuguesa-UCP2
801–1000Universidade da Coruña3
801–1000Universidade de Brasília2
801–1000Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)2
801–1000Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2
801–1000Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)1
801–1000Universidade Federal do Paraná-UFPR2
801–1000Universita’ degli Studi di Ferrara1
801–1000Università degli Studi di Udine1
801–1000Università degli studi Roma Tre1
801–1000Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche1
801–1000Universitas Padjadjaran2
801–1000Universität Duisburg-Essen3
801–1000Université de Lille1
801–1000Université de Lorraine3
801–1000Université de Nantes1
801–1000Université de Rennes 11
801–1000Université Toulouse 1 Capitole3
801–1000Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL)2
801–1000Universiti Malaysia Pahang1
801–1000Universiti Malaysia Perlis2
801–1000Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR)2
801–1000University of Alicante1
801–1000University of Baghdad2
801–1000University of Bahrain3
801–1000University of Bari1
801–1000University of Brighton3
801–1000University of Calcutta1
801–1000University of Central Lancashire3
801–1000University of Dhaka2
801–1000University of East London3
801–1000University of Engineering & Technology (UET) Lahore2
801–1000UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK2
801–1000University of Hartford3
801–1000University of Hertfordshire3
801–1000University of Hradec Kralove2
801–1000University of Kwazulu-Natal1
801–1000University of Lincoln1
801–1000University of Lodz3
801–1000University of Malta3
801–1000University of Maribor3
801–1000University of Messina (UniME)1
801–1000University of Mississippi3
801–1000University of Missouri, Kansas City1
801–1000University of Murcia2
801–1000University of Naples Parthenope1
801–1000University of New England Australia1
801–1000University of New Hampshire1
801–1000University of Palermo1
801–1000University of Parma1
801–1000University of Patras1
801–1000University of Salerno1
801–1000University of Salford3
801–1000University of Santo Tomas1
801–1000University of Seoul3
801–1000University of Texas at San Antonio1
801–1000University of the Punjab2
801–1000University of the West of England3
801–1000University of Tulsa3
801–1000University of Tyumen3
801–1000University of Wisconsin Milwaukee1
801–1000University of Wroclaw1
801–1000University of Wyoming1
801–1000University of Žilina2
801–1000Verona University1
801–1000Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM)2
801–1000Vietnam National University, Hanoi2
801–1000Vytautas Magnus University3
801–1000West Virginia University1
801–1000Wroclaw University of Science and Technology (WRUST)2
801–1000Wuhan University of Technology1
801–1000Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University1
801–1000Yamaguchi University2
801–1000Yerevan State University2
801–1000Yeungnam University1
801–1000Yokohama National University1
1001–1200Al Quds University The Arab University in Jerusalem2
1001–1200Al-Azhar University1
1001–1200Alexandria University2
1001–1200Aligarh Muslim University3
1001–1200Amity University3
1001–1200Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham2
1001–1200Anadolu University2
1001–1200An-Najah National University1
1001–1200Assiut University2
1001–1200Athens University of Economics and Business1
1001–1200Azerbaijan State University of Economics2
1001–1200Babes-Bolyai University2
1001–1200Baku State University2
1001–1200Banaras Hindu University1
1001–1200Baylor University1
1001–1200Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics2
1001–1200Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla2
1001–1200Bina Nusantara University (BINUS)2
1001–1200Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani1
1001–1200Birmingham City University3
1001–1200BRAC University2
1001–1200Brigham Young University1
1001–1200British University in Egypt2
1001–1200Brock University1
1001–1200Canterbury Christ Church University3
1001–1200Católica de Córdoba2
1001–1200Chang Jung Christian University2
1001–1200China University of Political Science and Law2
1001–1200Chung Yuan Christian University1
1001–1200Chungbuk National University3
1001–1200COMSATS University Islamabad1
1001–1200Diponegoro University2
1001–1200Doshisha University2
1001–1200EGE UNIVERSITY2
1001–1200Escuela Politécnica Nacional2
1001–1200Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL)2
1001–1200Feng Chia University1
1001–1200Florida Atlantic University-Boca Raton1
1001–1200Fu Jen Catholic University1
1001–1200Gazi Üniversitesi2
1001–1200Glasgow Caledonian University3
1001–1200Harper Adams University1
1001–1200Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University-IMSIU1
1001–1200Indian Institute of Information Technology, Allahabad1
1001–1200Irkutsk State University2
1001–1200Istanbul Aydin University3
1001–1200Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi1
1001–1200Ivan Franko National University of Lviv2
1001–1200Izmir Institute of Technology (IZTECH)1
1001–1200Jamia Hamdard1
1001–1200Jeju National University2
1001–1200Kangwon National University1
1001–1200Kent State University1
1001–1200King Mongkut\’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang2
1001–1200Kookmin University3
1001–1200Kuwait University3
1001–1200Leeds Beckett University1
1001–1200Makerere University1
1001–1200Marquette University2
1001–1200Meiji University2
1001–1200Miami University3
1001–1200Mississippi State University1
1001–1200Multimedia University (MMU)1
1001–1200Mustansiriyah University2
1001–1200Mutah University3
1001–1200Nagoya Institute of Technology (NIT)1
1001–1200National Dong Hwa University1
1001–1200National Taiwan Ocean University1
1001–1200National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (NaUKMA)2
1001–1200North South University2
1001–1200Northern Arizona University1
1001–1200North-West University1
1001–1200Ohio University1
1001–1200OSMANIA UNIVERSITY1
1001–1200Panjab University1
1001–1200Paul Valéry University Montpellier3
1001–1200Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE)2
1001–1200Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)1
1001–1200Portland State University1
1001–1200Pukyong National University1
1001–1200Rikkyo University2
1001–1200Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)3
1001–1200Russian State University for the Humanities2
1001–1200Saint-Petersburg Mining University3
1001–1200Saitama University1
1001–1200Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University2
1001–1200San Diego State University1
1001–1200Seoul National University of Science and Technology1
1001–1200Shahid Beheshti University (SBU)1
1001–1200Shanghai International Studies University3
1001–1200Sheffield Hallam University3
1001–1200Siberian Federal University, SibFU1
1001–1200Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra2
1001–1200Sookmyung Women’s University2
1001–1200Suez Canal University2
1001–1200Taibah University2
1001–1200Tallinn University3
1001–1200Technical University of Lublin1
1001–1200Telkom University2
1001–1200Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology1
1001–1200The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia3
1001–1200The National Research University “Belgorod State University”3
1001–1200The University of Lahore2
1001–1200The University of Northampton3
1001–1200The University of Texas at Arlington3
1001–1200Tokai University2
1001–1200Tomas Bata University in Zlin3
1001–1200Ton Duc Thang University2
1001–1200Universidad Andrés Bello2
1001–1200Universidad Austral de Chile2
1001–1200Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León2
1001–1200Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha1
1001–1200Universidad de La Frontera (UFRO)1
1001–1200Universidad de Lima2
1001–1200Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM)2
1001–1200Universidad de Puerto Rico2
1001–1200Universidad de Talca2
1001–1200Universidad de Valparaíso (UV)2
1001–1200Universidad del Desarrollo (UDD)2
1001–1200Universidad del Norte2
1001–1200Universidad del Pacífico2
1001–1200Universidad Industrial de Santander-UIS2
1001–1200Universidad Metropolitana2
1001–1200Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina2
1001–1200Universidad Nacional de Cuyo1
1001–1200Universidad Nacional de la Asunción2
1001–1200Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM)2
1001–1200Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica2
1001–1200Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas2
1001–1200Universidad Rey Juan Carlos1
1001–1200Universidad Tecnológica de la Habana José Antonio Echeverría, Cujae2
1001–1200Universidade de Vigo1
1001–1200Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)2
1001–1200Universidade Federal da Bahia2
1001–1200Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)1
1001–1200Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)2
1001–1200Universidade Federal Fluminense2
1001–1200Universita’ degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti Pescara1
1001–1200Università degli Studi della Tuscia (University of Tuscia)1
1001–1200Universitas Brawijaya2
1001–1200Universitas Hasanuddin2
1001–1200Universität Siegen3
1001–1200Universitatea de Vest din Timisoara/West University of Timisoara2
1001–1200Université de Poitiers3
1001–1200Université de Toulouse II-Le Mirail3
1001–1200Université Jean Moulin Lyon 33
1001–1200Université Lumière Lyon 21
1001–1200Université Paris-Nanterre2
1001–1200Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS)2
1001–1200Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)1
1001–1200Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT)2
1001–1200University of Agriculture, Faisalabad1
1001–1200University of Arkansas Fayetteville1
1001–1200University of Belgrade2
1001–1200University of Bialystok2
1001–1200University of Bucharest2
1001–1200University of Calabria1
1001–1200University of Colombo2
1001–1200University of Derby3
1001–1200University of Ghana2
1001–1200University of International Business and Economics3
1001–1200University of Karachi2
1001–1200University of Kufa2
1001–1200University of Latvia1
1001–1200University of Miskolc2
1001–1200University of Montana Missoula1
1001–1200University of Mumbai1
1001–1200University of Niš2
1001–1200University of North Carolina at Charlotte1
1001–1200University of North Texas1
1001–1200University of Ostrava3
1001–1200University of Pardubice3
1001–1200University of Peradeniya2
1001–1200University of Rhode Island1
1001–1200University of Rijeka2
1001–1200University of San Diego1
1001–1200University of San Francisco3
1001–1200University of Silesia in Katowice1
1001–1200University of South Alabama (USA)2
1001–1200University of Texas El Paso1
1001–1200University of the Pacific3
1001–1200University of the Sunshine Coast4
1001–1200University of the Western Cape1
1001–1200University of Wolverhampton3
1001–1200Utah State University1
1001–1200Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT)1
1001–1200Voronezh State University3
1001–1200VSB-Technical University of Ostrava3
1001–1200Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW (WULS-SGGW)1
1001–1200Western Michigan University1
1001–1200Youngsan University2
1001–1200Yuan Ze University1
1201+Don State Technical University1
1201+Akdeniz Üniversitesi2
1201+Al-Balqa Applied University2
1201+Alexandru Ioan Cuza University1
1201+Aoyama Gakuin University2
1201+Bahauddin Zakariya University1
1201+Birzeit university2
1201+Cukurova University2
1201+Damascus University2
1201+Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi2
1201+German University in Cairo2
1201+Hanoi University of Science and Technology2
1201+Helwan University2
1201+Hongik University1
1201+Indiana State University2
1201+Kindai University (Kinki University)2
1201+Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu2
1201+Mansoura University2
1201+Marmara University2
1201+MIREA-Russian Technological University2
1201+Moscow City University2
1201+Moscow Pedagogical State University3
1201+National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI)3
1201+National Taipei University2
1201+Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná2
1201+Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy2
1201+Sakarya University1
1201+Shanghai University of Finance and Economics2
1201+Shibaura Institute of Technology1
1201+Soochow University (Taiwan)2
1201+Southwest University2
1201+SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY2
1201+Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava3
1201+Sudan University of Science and Technology2
1201+Suranaree University of Technology2
1201+Tamkang University1
1201+Tanta University2
1201+Technical University of Cluj-Napoca2
1201+The “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi1
1201+The Hashemite University1
1201+The University of Notre Dame, Australia2
1201+Toraighyrov University2
1201+Transilvania University of Brasov2
1201+Tunghai University1
1201+Universidad Autónoma de Baja California2
1201+Universidad Autónoma de Chile2
1201+Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro (UAQ)2
1201+Universidad Autónoma de San Luis de Potosí2
1201+Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan2
1201+Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM)2
1201+Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins2
1201+Universidad Católica Boliviana “San Pablo”2
1201+Universidad Católica de Colombia2
1201+Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil2
1201+Universidad Católica del Norte2
1201+Universidad de Guanajuato2
1201+Universidad de La Salle2
1201+Universidad de La Serena1
1201+Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE (Ex-Escuela Politécnica del Ejército)2
1201+Universidad de Medellín2
1201+Universidad de Panamá-UP2
1201+Universidad de Sonora2
1201+Universidad del Bío-Bío2
1201+Universidad del Salvador1
1201+Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (UMSA)2
1201+Universidad Nacional de Quilmes2
1201+Universidad Nacional del Litoral2
1201+Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola2
1201+Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar2
1201+Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira2
1201+Universidade Estadual de Londrina2
1201+Universidade Federal da Paraíba2
1201+Universidade Federal de Goiás2
1201+Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2
1201+Università degli studi di Bergamo1
1201+Universitas Andalas2
1201+Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta2
1201+Universitas Sebelas Maret2
1201+Universitas Sumatera Utara2
1201+Université de Caen Normandie1
1201+Université de Tunis El Manar2
1201+Université Mohammed V de Rabat2
1201+University of Babylon2
1201+University of Khartoum2
1201+University of Kragujevac2
1201+University of Sarajevo2
1201+University of Split2
1201+University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest2
1201+University Politehnica of Timisoara, UPT2
1201+Yarmouk University1
1201+Yildiz Technical University1
1201+Zagazig University2

References

  1. Adamakou, Maria, Dimitris Kallioras, and George Petrakos. 2021. Detecting Convergence Trends among EU Universities. Economies 9: 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alzafari, Khaled, and Jani Ursin. 2019. Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: Does context matter? Quality in Higher Education 25: 58–75. [Google Scholar]
  3. Belov, Andrey, Galina Chernova, Vladimir Khalin, and Natalia Kuznetsova. 2018. Universities’competitiveness models in academic management: A national-level approach. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development 40: 155–66. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertsimas, Dimitris, Agni Orfanoudaki, and Holly Wiberg. 2021. Interpretable clustering: An optimization approach. Machine Learning 110: 89–138. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bleiklie, Ivar, and Maurice Kogan. 2007. Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy 20: 477–93. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bleiklie, Ivar. 1998. Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education. Journal of Public Affairs Education 4: 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  7. Broucker, Bruno, and Kurt de Wit. 2015. New public management in higher education. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–75. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bugaj, Justyna M., and Radosław Rybkowski. 2018. The use of international rankings in the formulation of a university’s strategic goals—The polish perspective. Journal of Economics and Management 34: 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cantwell, Brendan, and Ilka Kauppinen. 2014. Academic Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Qi, Wen Luo, Gregory J. Palardy, Ryan Glaman, and Amber McEnturff. 2017. The Efficacy of Common Fit Indices for Enumerating Classes in Growth Mixture Models When Nested Data Structure Is Ignored: A Monte Carlo Study. SAGE Open 7: 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cortés, Julián D., Liliana Rivera, and Katerina Bohle Carbonelld. 2022. Mission statements in universities: Readability and performance. European Research on Management and Business Economics 28: 100183. [Google Scholar]
  12. Daft, Richard L. 2010. Organization Theory and Design 10th Edition. Mason: South-Western. [Google Scholar]
  13. Damrosch, David. 1995. We Scholars. Changing the Culture of the University. British Journal of Educational Studies 44: 124–26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dill, David D., and Maarja Soo. 2005. Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education 49: 495–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dougherty, Kevin J., and Rebecca S. Natow. 2015. The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Origins, Discontinuations, and Transformations. Baltimore: JHU Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dougherty, Kevin J, and Rebecca S. Natow. 2020. Performance-based funding for higher education: How well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Higher Education 80: 457–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ferlie, Ewan, Christine Musselin, and Gianluca Andresani. 2008. The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education 56: 325–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fox, Mary Frank. 1983. Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science 13: 285–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frølich, Nicoline, Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt, and Maria J. Rosa. 2010. Funding systems for higher education and their impacts on institutional strategies and academia: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Educational Management 24: 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frølich, Nicoline. 2011. Multi-layered accountability. Performance-based funding of universities. Public Administration 89: 840–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gross, Edward. 1969. The definition of organizational goals. The British Journal of Sociology 20: 277–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, Xin, and Karen L. Blackmore. 2019. Developing a scholar classification scheme from publication patterns in academic science: A cluster analysis approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70: 1262–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guthrie, James, and Ruth Neumann. 2007. Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities: The establishment of a performance-driven system for Australian higher education. Public Management Review 9: 231–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2007. The impact of league tables and ranking systems on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy 19: 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2009. Rankings and the battle for world-class excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choices. Higher Education Management and Policy 21: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2011. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hosier, Maeve, and Bheshaj Kumar Ashley Hoolash. 2017. The effect of methodological variations on university rankings and associated decision-making and policy. Studies in Higher Education 44: 201–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hubbard, Katharine, Michael O’Neill, and Stuart Nattrass. 2021. Levelling the playing field: The effect of including widening participation in university league tables. International Review of Education 67: 273–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Islam, Talat. 2019. Motivation to transfer training in learning organizations. Journal of Management Development 38: 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jain, Anil K., M. Narasimha Murty, and Patrick J. Flynn. 1999. Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 31: 264–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jalote, Pankaj, Bijendra Nath Jain, and Sudhir Sopory. 2020. Classification for research universities in India. Higher Education 79: 225–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. James, Melissa A., and Gemma E. Derrick. 2020. When “culture trumps strategy”: Higher education institutional strategic plans and their influence on international student recruitment practice. Higher Education 79: 569–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jöns, Heike, and Michael Hoyler. 2013. Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum 46: 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lane, Jason E., and Jussi A. Kivisto. 2008. Interests, information, and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent theory and its potential applications to the study of higher education governance. In Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 141–79. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Amy Y. 2017. The point of the point: Washington’s student achievement initiative through the looking glass of a community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 41: 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Locke, William, Line Verbik, John T. E. Richardson, and Roger King. 2008. Counting What is Measured or Measuring What Counts? League Tables and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions in England. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. [Google Scholar]
  37. McKinney, Wes. 2010. Data structures for statistical computing in python. Paper presented at the 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, TX, USA, 28 June–3 July 2010; vol. 445, pp. 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  38. Morçöl, Göktuğ. 2012. A Complexity Theory for Public Policy. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ness, Erik C., Mary M. Deupree, and Denisa Gándara. 2015. Campus Responses to Outcomes-Based Funding in Tennessee: Robust, Aligned, and Contested. Final report to Tennessee Higher Education Commission and Ford Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ordorika, Imanol, and Marion Lloyd. 2015. International rankings and the contest for university hegemony. Journal of Education Policy 30: 385–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Patel, Eva, and D. Singh Kushwaha. 2020. Clustering cloud workloads: K-means vs gaussian mixture model. Procedia Computer Science 171: 158–67. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-Esparrells, Carmen, and Enrique Orduna-Malea. 2018. Do the technical universities exhibit distinct behaviour in global university rankings? A Times Higher Education (THE) case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 48: 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pinheiro, Rómulo, and Mitchell Young. 2017. The university as an adaptive resilient organization: A complex systems perspective. In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research. Bentley: Emerald Publishing Limited, vol. 3, pp. 119–36. [Google Scholar]
  44. Qiang, Zha. 2003. Internationalization of higher education: Towards a conceptual framework. Policy Futures in Education 1: 248–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. QS World University Ranking. 2022. Distributed by QS Quacquarelli Symonds Limited. Available online: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2022 (accessed on 13 January 2022).
  46. Rabovsky, Thomas. 2014. Support for performance-based funding: The role of political ideology, performance, and dysfunctional information environments. Public Administration Review 74: 761–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rhys, Hefin. 2020. Machine Learning with R, the Tidyverse, and Mlr. New York: Simon and Schuster. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shehatta, Ibrahim, and Khalid Mahmood. 2016. Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: Policy implications. Scientometrics 109: 1231–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Soliman, Samar, John Anchor, and David Taylor. 2019. The international strategies of universities: Deliberate or emergent? Studies in Higher Education 44: 1413–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stensaker, Bjørn, and Lee Harvey, eds. 2011. Accountability in Higher Education. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sullivan, Shirley. 1996. Scholarly publishing: Trash or treasure? Australian Academic & Research Libraries 27: 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tee, Kong Fah. 2015. Identifying critical performance indicators and suitable partners using a benchmarking template. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 64: 434–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Teixeira, Pedro N., and David D. Dill, eds. 2011. Public Vices, Private Virtues?: Assessing the Effects of Marketization in Higher Education. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tofallis, Chris. 2012. A different approach to university rankings. Higher Education 63: 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Van Raan, Anthony F. J. 2005. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62: 133–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Van’t Land, Hilligje, Andreas Corcoran, and Diana-Camelia Iancu. 2021. The Promise of Higher Education: Essays in Honour of 70 Years of IAU. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Nature. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. AIC and BIC parameters are used to determine the number of clusters.
Figure 1. AIC and BIC parameters are used to determine the number of clusters.
Economies 10 00209 g001
Figure 2. Boxplots of variables per cluster (academic reputation score, faculty student score, citation per faculty score, international student score).
Figure 2. Boxplots of variables per cluster (academic reputation score, faculty student score, citation per faculty score, international student score).
Economies 10 00209 g002
Table 1. Ranking Indicators and their explanation by (QS World University Ranking 2022).
Table 1. Ranking Indicators and their explanation by (QS World University Ranking 2022).
Ranking IndicatorExplanation
International student ratioThis indicator calculates the ratio of international students to overall students.
International Faculty ratioThis indicator calculates the ratio of international faculty staff to overall staff.
Faculty-student ratioThis indicator is calculated by dividing the number of students validated by QS by the Faculty figure validated by QS.
Citations per facultyThe indicator is calculated by citation count for six years for papers published over five years.
Academic reputationThe results of this indicator are based on the responses to a survey distributed to worldwide academics with a different number of sources.
Employer reputationThe results of this indicators are based on the responses to a survey distributed to worldwide employers with a different number of sources.
Table 2. Dataset summary statistics (Count, Mean, Standard deviation, Minimum, Maximum).
Table 2. Dataset summary statistics (Count, Mean, Standard deviation, Minimum, Maximum).
CountMeanstdmin25%50%75%Max
Academic_reputation_score130021.552523.315616.211.925.925100
Employer_reputation_score130022.19324.535915.111.9529.625100
Faculty_student_score129931.907328.564419.420.647.95100
Citation_per_Faculty_score130026.293328.29913.413.443.4100
International_faculty_score122826.503735.429511.75.444.425100
International_student_score127528.119131.211613.7513.244.45100
Table 3. Means of the variables per cluster.
Table 3. Means of the variables per cluster.
ClusterAcademic_
Reputation_Score (Mean)
Faculty_
Student_Score (Mean)
Citation_Per_
Faculty_Score (Mean)
International_
Student_Score (Mean)
10.1000.1140.3150.075
20.08290.1740.0190.018
30.0900.4530.0650.353
40.4310.4220.4960.492
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elbawab, R. University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis. Economies 2022, 10, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090209

AMA Style

Elbawab R. University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis. Economies. 2022; 10(9):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elbawab, Roba. 2022. "University Rankings and Goals: A Cluster Analysis" Economies 10, no. 9: 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop