Next Article in Journal
Generation Y’s Perception of Servant Leadership and Job Satisfaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Corruption and Tax Burden: What Is the Joint Effect on Total Factor Productivity?
Previous Article in Journal
Testing the Role of Trade on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Portugal
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Do Women Managers Avoid Paying Bribes?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Education and Macroeconomic Variables on Corruption Index in G20 Member Countries

1
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University, Central Java 50275, Indonesia
2
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sebelas Maret University, Central Java 57126, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Economies 2021, 9(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010023
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Revised: 7 February 2021 / Accepted: 7 February 2021 / Published: 16 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Corruption on the Economy)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of several macroeconomic variables consisting of gross domestic products (GDP) per capita, economic openness, government effectiveness index, inflation, and the level of education on the corruption index in G20 member countries. This study focused on the effect of education on the level of corruption in the G20 member countries by treating other macroeconomic variables as control variables that were not analyzed in depth. This research used mixed methods with multiple regression with two stage least square (2SLS) estimation method followed by phenomenological analysis. This study found that primary education enrolment and the lifelong learning index did not significantly influence the level of corruption for all G20 member countries, developed member countries, and developing member countries. Secondary education enrolment showed a negative and significant influence on the level of corruption in all categories of countries (all members, developing, and developed countries). Tertiary education enrolment had a negative and significant influence on the level of corruption in all members and developing countries, but had a positive influence in the developed countries. GDP per capita had a contrasting influence: negative and significant influence in the developed countries, but positive and significant influence in the developing countries. Similar to secondary education, the government effectiveness index had a negative and significant influence in all categories of countries (all members, developing, and developed countries). In contrast, inflation and economic openness had a positive and significant influence on the level of corruption, but only in developing countries. The policy implication of this study is the prioritization of secondary education to tackle corruption problems.
Keywords: G20; macroeconomic; gross domestic products (GDP); corruption; education G20; macroeconomic; gross domestic products (GDP); corruption; education

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maria, N.S.B.; Susilowati, I.; Fathoni, S.; Mafruhah, I. The Effect of Education and Macroeconomic Variables on Corruption Index in G20 Member Countries. Economies 2021, 9, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010023

AMA Style

Maria NSB, Susilowati I, Fathoni S, Mafruhah I. The Effect of Education and Macroeconomic Variables on Corruption Index in G20 Member Countries. Economies. 2021; 9(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maria, Nugroho S. B., Indah Susilowati, Salman Fathoni, and Izza Mafruhah. 2021. "The Effect of Education and Macroeconomic Variables on Corruption Index in G20 Member Countries" Economies 9, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010023

APA Style

Maria, N. S. B., Susilowati, I., Fathoni, S., & Mafruhah, I. (2021). The Effect of Education and Macroeconomic Variables on Corruption Index in G20 Member Countries. Economies, 9(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop