Thrown into Deep Water: Feedback on Student Satisfaction—A Case Study in Hungarian and Romanian Universities

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Small visual suggestions: Fig.3 (170,171 pp.) and Fig.4 (172- 174 pp) States colors in both figures would be good in same colors (for example, Finland is in different colors)

According research result, would be desirable to supplement with suggestions and tasks for improving e-learning. For example, main three tasks at university.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your review report, and for your suggestions for improving the article.

Please find in the reviewed and uploaded version of the article all modifications and additions according to your remarks (we used Track Changes, so all modifications and revisions can be easily seen ):

1. The whole article was checked and got an extensive English revision.
2. In Fig. 3 and Fig 4. we coordinated the states colors (in both figures the states have the same colour).
3. You can find in the Conclusions our suggestions and recommandations for improving e-learning in the future (395-399 pp).

Thank you again, we hope that the improvements and modifications will be accepted.

Reviewer 2 Report

The article can be published without significant changes.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your review report.

The whole article was checked and got an extensive English revision.

Thank you again, we hope that the improvements and modifications will be accepted.

Reviewer 3 Report

I would accept with minor revisions. Please see my comments

For instance:

Line 40, “the” countries. Please delete the word “the” before countries.

Please name the studies. One example of many, line 78. According to a study, [4], you need to name who the study was done within the sentence. Please do this for all examples within this paper.

Line 133 what is “de”?

Line 318 and lines 319, I would specify the p level. You say p =0.00 but I would give a number or a less than. For instance p ≤ 0.05

Line 358, why will the result be able to be measured later on?

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your review report, and for your suggestions for improving the article.

Please find in the reviewed and uploaded version of the article all modifications and additions according to your remarks (we used Track Changes, so all modifications and revisions can be easily seen ):

1. The whole article was checked and got an extensive English revision.

2.  We deleted the word “the” before countries in line 40.

3.  

   All studyes were named. Please find all completions within this paper.

4.  

   The “de” in line 133 was deleted and replaced with “the“.

5.  

   The p level was specify to p ≤ 0.05.

6.  

   Regarding line 358, “ why will the result be able to be measured later on? “ we responded in yhe Conclusions 390-394 pp.

Thank you again, we hope that the improvements and modifications will be accepted.