Positive Creativity in a Negative World
Abstract
:1. Positive Creativity in a Negative World
2. Positive Creativity in Education
3. The CASE Model of Creativity
3.1. Lack of Capital for Positive Creativity
3.2. Lack of Awareness for Positive Creativity
3.3. Lack of Spark for Positive Creativity
3.4. Lack of Exceptionality for Positive Creativity
4. Looking Forward
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sher, L. COVID-19, anxiety, sleep disturbances and suicide. Sleep Med. 2020, 70, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mann, F.D.; Krueger, R.F.; Vohs, K.D. Personal economic anxiety in response to COVID-19. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2020, 167, 110233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clayton, S. Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. J. Anxiety Disord. 2020, 74, 102263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Usman, L.M. Terrorism and female teacher leadership in girls’ secondary school. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2018, 32, 669–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olusanya, B. Systemic racism in global health: A personal reflection. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e1051–e1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchanan, K.; Aknin, L.B.; Lotun, S.; Sandstrom, G.M. Brief exposure to social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: Doom-scrolling has negative emotional consequences, but kindness- scrolling does not. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baysha, O. Dividing social networks: Facebook unfriending, unfollowing, and blocking in turbulent political times. Russ. J. Commun. 2020, 12, 104–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.K.; Rohla, R. The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science 2018, 360, 1020–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elghossain, T.; Bott, S.; Akik, C.; Obermeyer, C.M. Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in the Arab world: A systematic review. BMC Int. Health Hum. Rights 2019, 19, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nickerson, A.B.; Schildkraut, J. State Anxiety Prior to and after Participating in Lockdown Drills Among Students in a Rural High School. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonton, D.K. Creative Genius as Inherently Relevant and Beneficial: The View from Mount Olympus. Creativity. Theor. Res. Appl. 2018, 5, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Florida, R. The creative city. In Cambridge Handbook of Creativity; Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 623–639. [Google Scholar]
- Beghetto, R.A.; Kaufman, J.C. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2007, 1, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaufman, J.C. Finding Meaning with Creativity in the Past, Present, and Future. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 13, 734–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sternberg, R.J. Transformational Giftedness: Rethinking Our Paradigm for Gifted Education. Roeper Rev. 2020, 42, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R.J. Identification for utilization, not merely possession, of gifts: What matters is not gifts but rather deployment of gifts. Gift. Educ. Int. 2021, 02614294211013345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R.J. Transformational Creativity: The Link between Creativity, Wisdom, and the Solution of Global Problems. Philosophies 2021, 6, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R.J. Positive creativity. In Current Research in Positive Psychology; Kostic, A., Chadee, D., Eds.; Palgrave-Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 33–42. [Google Scholar]
- Sternberg, R.; Chowkase, A. When We Teach for Positive Creativity, What Exactly Do We Teach For? Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forgeard, M.J.C.; Mecklenburg, A.C. The Two Dimensions of Motivation and a Reciprocal Model of the Creative Process. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2013, 17, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Glăveanu, V.P. Making the CASE for shadow creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, D.; Kaufman, J.C. Respecting the invisible: Transactional and transformational approaches to giftedness. In Transformational Giftedness: Identifying and Developing Gifted Children Who Will Make the World a Better Place; Sternberg, R.J., Ambrose, D., Karami, S., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Arrington, K.; Barnett, P.J.; Holinger, M.; Liu, X.; Xie, L. Creativity is our gig: Focusing on the positive and practical. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Barbot, B.; Hass, R.W.; Reiter-Palmon, R. Creativity assessment in psychological research: (Re)setting the standards. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2019, 13, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plucker, J.A.; Makel, M.C.; Qian, M. Assessment of creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 2nd ed.; Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 44–68. [Google Scholar]
- Runco, M.A.; Acar, S. Divergent thinking. In Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 2nd ed.; Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 224–254. [Google Scholar]
- Amabile, T.M. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology Of Creativity; Westview Press: Nashville, TN, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Fiorineschi, L.; Rotini, F. Novelty metrics in engineering design. J. Eng. Des. 2021, 32, 590–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, J.J.; Smith, S.M.; Vargas-Hernandez, N. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des. Stud. 2003, 24, 111–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Baer, J. Beyond New and Appropriate: Who Decides What Is Creative? Creat. Res. J. 2012, 24, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R. Transformational vs. Transactional Deployment of Intelligence. J. Intell. 2021, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, R.J. A Theory of Adaptive Intelligence and Its Relation to General Intelligence. J. Intell. 2019, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- James, K.; Clark, K.; Cropanzano, R. Positive and Negative Creativity in Groups, Institutions, and Organizations: A Model and Theoretical Extension. Creat. Res. J. 1999, 12, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropley, D.H.; Kaufman, J.C.; Cropley, A.J. Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creat. Res. J. 2008, 20, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Saint Laurent, C.; Glaveanu, V.; Chaudet, C. Malevolent Creativity and Social Media: Creating Anti-immigration Communities on Twitter. Creat. Res. J. 2020, 32, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozin, P.; Royzman, E.B. Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 5, 296–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P.K.; Brain, P. Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggress. Behav. 2000, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swearer, S.; Hymel, S. Bullying and Discrimination in Schools: Exploring Variations Across Student Subgroups. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 44, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, B. Teens in Cyberspace: Researchers Race to Keep Up. Pediatr. News 2009, 43, 18–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashel, B.A. Teaching students to hack: Ethical implications in teaching students to hack at the university level. In Proceedings of the 2006 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference, InfoSecCD ’06, Kennesaw, Georgia, 22–23 September 2006; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 197–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kumashiro, K. Reflections on “bad teachers”. Berkeley Rev. Educ. 2012, 3, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karwowski, M. School Does Not Kill Creativity. Eur. Psychol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beghetto, R.A.; Kaufman, J.C. Teaching for creativity with disciplined improvisation. In Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching; Sawyer, R.K., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 94–109. [Google Scholar]
- Lobman, C.L. Improvisation: An analytic tool for examining teacher–child interactions in the early childhood classroom. Early Child. Res. Q. 2006, 21, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berk, R.A.; Trieber, R.H. Whose classroom is it, anyway? Improvisation as a teaching tool. J. Excell. Coll. Teach. 2009, 20, 29–60. [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer, R.K.; John-Steiner, V.; Moran, S.; Sternberg, R.J.; Feldman, D.H.; Nakamura, J.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. Key Issues in Creativity and Development. In Creativity and Development; Sawyer, R.K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R.J., Feldman, D.H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Gardner, H., Nakamura, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 217–242. [Google Scholar]
- Glăveanu, V.P. Children and creativity: A most (un)likely pair? Think. Ski. Creat. 2011, 6, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Simonton, D.K. Cinematic Creativity and Production Budgets: Does Money Make the Movie? J. Creat. Behav. 2005, 39, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sullivan, A. Bourdieu and education: How useful is Bourdieu’s theory for researchers? Neth. J. Soc. Sci. 2002, 38, 144–166. [Google Scholar]
- Eason, R.; Giannangelo, D.M.; Franceschini, L.A. A look at creativity in public and private schools. Think. Ski. Creat. 2009, 4, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stantcheva, S. Inequalities in the Times of a Pandemic. Economic Policy. 2021. Available online: https://www.economic-policy.org/73rd-economic-policy-panel/inequalities-in-the-times-of-a-pandemic (accessed on 10 November 2021).
- Opalka, A.; Gable, A.; Nicola, T.; Ash, J. Rural School Districts Can Be Creative in Solving the Internet Connectivity Gap—But They Need Support. Brown Center Chalkboard. 2020. Available online: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2020/08/10/rural-school-districts-can-be-creative-in-solving-the-internet-connectivity-gap-but-they-need-support (accessed on 9 November 2021).
- Glăveanu, V.P.; Ness, I.; de Saint Laurent, C. Creative Learning in Digital and Virtual Environments: Opportunities and Challenges of Technology-Enabled Learning and Creativity; Routledge: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Beghetto, R.A. In Praise of Clark Kent: Creative Metacognition and the Importance of Teaching Kids When (Not) to Be Creative. Roeper Rev. 2013, 35, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urban, M.; Urban, K. Unskilled but aware of it? Cluster analysis of creative metacognition from preschool age to early adulthood. J. Creat. Behav. 2021, 55, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puente, D.R.; Cavazos, A.J. Creative metacognitive feelings as a source of information for creative self-efficacy, creativity potential, intrapersonal idea selection, and task enjoyment. J. Creat. Behav. 2020, 54, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karwowski, M.; Lebuda, I. The big five, the huge two and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2016, 10, 214–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karwowski, M.; Lebuda, I.; Wisniewska, E. Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Int. J. Creat. Probl. Solving 2018, 28, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Karwowski, M. The Dynamics of Creative Self-Concept: Changes and Reciprocal Relations Between Creative Self-Efficacy and Creative Personal Identity. Creat. Res. J. 2016, 28, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beghetto, R.A. Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. In Creativity under Duress in Education? Mullen, C.A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 27–40. [Google Scholar]
- Gajda, A.; Beghetto, R.A.; Karwowski, M. Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Think. Ski. Creat. 2017, 24, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patston, T.J.; Cropley, D.H.; Marrone, R.L.; Kaufman, J.C. Teacher self-concepts of creativity: Meeting the challenges of the 21st Century classroom. Int. J. Creat. Probl. Solving 2017, 27, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
- Sternberg, R.J. Four alternative futures for education in the United States: It’s our choice. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 33, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glăveanu, V.P.; Kaufman, J.C. Socializing Giftedness: Toward an ACCEL-S Approach. Roeper Rev. 2017, 39, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glăveanu, V.P. Habitual Creativity: Revising Habit, Reconceptualizing Creativity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2012, 16, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niu, W.; Kaufman, J.C. Creativity of Chinese and American Cultures: A Synthetic Analysis. J. Creat. Behav. 2013, 47, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowacki, B. Western model of creativity: Generalizability and hypothetical educational consequences for the “non-Western world”. Int. J. Creat. Probl. Solving 2013, 23, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
- Rudowicz, E. Creativity and Culture: A two way interaction. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 2003, 47, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropley, D.H.; Patston, T.; Marrone, R.L.; Kaufman, J.C. Essential, unexceptional and universal: Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity. Think. Ski. Creat. 2019, 34, 100604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beghetto, R.A.; Kaufman, J.C.; Baer, J. Teaching for Creativity in the Common Core Classroom; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Moynihan, K.E. Local authors in the classroom: Bringing readers and writers together. Engl. J. 2009, 98, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
- Wines, C.; Pfeiffer, L.; Scott, A.; Woolcott, G. Eureka! Engaging classroom students in inquiry-based science lessons using local experts and contexts. Teach. Sci. 2018, 64, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- Cianciolo, A.T.; Sternberg, R.J. Practical intelligence and tacit knowledge: An ecological view of expertise. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance; Ericsson, K.A., Hoffman, R.R., Kozbelt, A., Williams, A.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 770–792. [Google Scholar]
- Kaufman, J.C.; Beghetto, R.A.; Watson, C. Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2016, 51, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karwowski, M.; Czerwonka, M.; Kaufman, J.C. Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2020, 14, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birney, D.P.; Beckmann, J.F.; Seah, Y.Z. More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task, and situation factors in evaluative judgements of creativity. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2016, 51, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klandermans, P.G.; van Stekelenburg, J. Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd ed.; Huddy, L., Sears, D.O., Levy, J.S., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 774–812. [Google Scholar]
- Montuori, A.; Purser, R.E. Deconstructing the Lone Genius Myth: Toward a Contextual View of Creativity. J. Humanist. Psychol. 1995, 35, 69–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plucker, J.A.; Beghetto, R.A.; Dow, G.T. Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educ. Psychol. 2004, 39, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, H. The creators’ patters. In Dimensions of Creativity; Boden, M., Ed.; MIT Press/Badford Books: London, UK, 1994; pp. 143–158. [Google Scholar]
Level of Creativity | Definition | Transactional Classroom Example | Transformational Classroom Example |
---|---|---|---|
mini-c | Creative actions or ideas that are personally meaningful. | A student has an insight that helps them study and achieve a better grade. | A student realizes a new way to explain a concept to a friend who is struggling. |
little-c | Everyday creativity that others can enjoy. | A student wins the school science fair with a novel idea. | A student leads a school fundraiser to help victims of an earthquake. |
Pro-c | Expert-level creativity that impacts a field or domain. | A teacher devises a new curriculum focused on improving test scores. | A teacher devises a new curriculum focused on fostering empathy. |
Big-C | Creative genius that lasts for generations after the creator’s lifetime. | An eminent scholar proposes a new way of assessing student performance. | An eminent scholar proposes a new way to help fight inequality in education. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaufman, J.C.; Glăveanu, V. Positive Creativity in a Negative World. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030193
Kaufman JC, Glăveanu V. Positive Creativity in a Negative World. Education Sciences. 2022; 12(3):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030193
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaufman, James C., and Vlad Glăveanu. 2022. "Positive Creativity in a Negative World" Education Sciences 12, no. 3: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030193
APA StyleKaufman, J. C., & Glăveanu, V. (2022). Positive Creativity in a Negative World. Education Sciences, 12(3), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030193